Greater p protein content is is a negative negative or rumin an s

Similar documents
FIELD PEAS IN LIVESTOCK DIETS. Karla Jenkins Cow/calf range management specialist, Panhandle Research and Extension Center

Objective. SROC Calf and Heifer Research Facility. Data for study

Recent Canola Meal Research with Broilers ( )

Successful Storage of By-Products

Opp p o p r o tun u i n t i ie i s t o o I m I p m r p ov o e v S arch h D ig i e g stib i i b l i i l t i y y on o n D air i y F rms

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Feeding Prickly Pear Cactus (PCC) to Ruminants

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

Bærme som proteinfoder til lakterende køer

Price and Information List

Some Hay Considerations

Price and Information List

Faba Bean. Uses of Faba Bean

Forage Systems to Increase Productivity

Crumbs Cycad meal... 31

Management and Feeding of Holstein Steers

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Our Business. Our Values. Transparency : Services : Integrity :

March The newborn calf 3/14/2016. Risks and Benefits of Milk vs. Milk Replacers for. Low milk prices???? Incentive to lower SCC?

Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing

General information on feed

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology

José C. Dubeux; UFRPE Brazil USE OF CACTUS FOR LIVESTOCK FEEDING

Net Energy of Sweet Corn Husk and Cob Silage Calculated from Digestibility in Cows

2016 Corn Silage Field Crop Trials Results

Forage Planting Alternatives Mike Ballweg, Crops & Soils Agent, Sheboygan County

Faba bean whole crop silage for dairy cows

Silage is a forage crop that is preserved in succulent condition by a process of fermentation (i.e. under anaerobic conditions).

ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

The Sugarcane Industry and Rabbit Feed Manufacture

Factors Affecting the Quality Silage After Harvest. Fermentation. Aerobic stability. Aerobic Stability of Silages?

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Three Sisters Cropping System

Finnish feed evaluation system and Feed Tables

21 st Annual IAOM MEA District Conference November 22-25, 2009 Cape Town South Africa. Oats & Its Milling. Dr. Irfan Hashmi

Elk Mound Seed. Company Introduction

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

InternationalJournalofAgricultural

Sunflower Meal. in Beef Cattle Diets

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Raw Materials Usage and Feed Production Returns

Feeding Raw or Heat-treated Whole Soybeans to Dairy Cattle 1

Keys to Producing High Quality Corn Silage in Western Canada

Annual Grasses Preserved as Silage: Fermentation Characteristics, Nutritive Value, and Quality

Managing Forage for Single Digit Shrink Loss in Bunker Silos and Drive-over Piles

COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE

Wood Sugar Molasses. for Dairy Cattle. I. R. Jones. gricu kural Experiment Station. State College Station Circular 181. regon. September 1949.

Silage Forage Quality Using Inoculants and Packing. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Animal Feed and Ingredients. Legumes Group 40. Rape-Pulse Mix. Corn Gluten Feed 60% Barley. Cotton Extract. Maize (Corn) Rape Seed Expeller

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE. Oats for intensively finished bulls TRIAL REPORT B46 (P065104) FOR EBLEX

The role of livestock in a sustainable diet: a land use perspective

Stacey Hamilton, PhD State Dairy Specialist Scott E. Poock, DVM, DABVP Associate Extension Professor

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

Nutritional value of seaweed for ruminants

CC110 Questions and Answers on Silage

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

Cool-Season Annual Forages for Hay in North Dakota

Feeding the preweaned calf. Dr. Peter S. Erickson Professor of Dairy Management and Extension Dairy Specialist

The Potential for Teff as an Alternative Forage Crop for Irrigated Regions

Comparing Qualities of Grain Corn to Silage Corn

FBy JOHN C. WALLER. Feeding programs often include byproducts

Functional Medicine Is the application of alternative holistic measures to show people how to reverse thyroid conditions, endocrine issues, hormone

Hulless Barley Potential Opportunities. Economics and Competitiveness

Sunflower Meal. in Beef Cattle Diets. Greg Lardy Animal Sciences Department Head

The Use of Sunflower Meal in Livestock Diets in Australia

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

SUPPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS FOR THE COW-CALF HERD

Annex I: 123 Items in the FAO Proposal for CPC with Split HS Codes but Important to be Included in the New CPC v. 2.0

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

AT HARVEST EFFECTS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF WINTER CEREALS FOR SILAGE

Making. High Quality SWEETPOTATO SILAGE. An Improved Tube Silage Making Method. transforming into

Hay Judging Scorecard

AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT 1575 Linden Drive University of Wisconsin-Madison Field Crops 26.5 January 1997

2015/02/15. Spineless cactus pear as livestock feed in South Africa. Feed production South Africa /14

DANCE PARTY HONKY-TONK LINE DANCE LESSONS. $3.00 Cover Charge for dance. $5 for lessons & Dance

MILLING TECHNOLOGY FOR CEREALS

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

EXPERIMENTS WITH REDUCED LIGNIN ALFALFA

Effect of chickling vetch (Lathyrus sativus L.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa) hay in gestating ewe diets

Economic and Environmental Impacts Of Corn Silage Maturity Management

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

Bunker Silo and Drive- Over Silage Pile Management

GRAIN TRADE AUSTRALIA. Section 9 MILLING BY-PRODUCTS & FIBRE STANDARDS 2014/2015 SEASON

Nutrient Management With Cover Crops. Darryl Warncke Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Effects of Ground Ear Corn vs. Ear Corn Silage on Rumen Fatty Acid Content

Use of Duckweed as a Protein Supplement for Breeding Ducks

Redacted for Privacy

Triticale Production and Utilization Manual 2005

Corn Silage for Dairy Cows 1

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

The Protein Era Challenges and opportunities for traditional and novel protein sources

Corn Silage as a Companion Forage: Pros and Cons

Barley Research at Aberdeen. Gongshe Hu USDA-ARS Aberdeen, Idaho

How Fine should Grain be Ground for Milk Cows?

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

Transcription:

Myths About Sorghum Grain as a Feed dstuff Chris Reinh hardt, Ph.D Kansas State University

Greater protein content isa negative For F rumin nants

The N has to comefrom somew where!!!

Lower conte ent and availability of nutrients sorghum un nsuitable for use in diets for nonruminants

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NRC, 0-3wk a wk utrient Requirement, % Corn Sorghum rotein 23.0 38 41 rginine 125 1.25 31 29 ly + Ser 1.25 57 58 istidine 0.35 67 65 soleucine 0.80 37 45 eucine 1.20 85 98 ysine 1.10 et + Cys 0.90 he + Tyr 1.34 roline 060 0.60 hreonine 0.80 ryptophan p 0.20 aline 0.90 24 20 41 38 52 62?? 37 37 31 41 46 50 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NR RC, 0-3wk a Nutrient Corn Sorghum Protein 38 41 Arginine 31 29 Gly + Ser 57 58 Histidine 67 65 Isoleucine 37 45 Leucine 85 98 Lysine 24 20 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NR RC, 0-3wk a Nutrient Corn Sorghum Protein 38 41 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NR RC, 0-3wk a Nutrient Corn Sorghum Protein 38 41 Arginine 31 29 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NR RC, 0-3wk a Nutrient Corn Sorghum Protein 38 41 Arginine 31 29 Gly + Ser 57 58 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

Corn vs Sorghum as % of NR RC, 0-3wk a Nutrient Corn Sorghum Protein 38 41 Arginine 31 29 Gly + Ser 57 58 Lysine 24 20 a Adapted from NRC (1994). All values on a 90% DM basis.

ME of Cereals in Broiler kcal/kg 4600 3,593 Chicks 3,829 3,307 3300 2000 Corn ronze vs yellow (P < 0.07) SE 180 Bronze Yellow

Sorghum mhas more of some AAs and vits Less of other AAs and vits

Sorghug um is full of tannins and/or mycotox xins

Tannins & BW Gain in 480 460 g 479 Broilerr Chicks 476 456 440 420 400 Corn org vs Tannin Sorg (P < 0.10) SE 4 Sorghum Tannin Sorghum

U.S. sorghum is notoriously low in tannins and mycotoxins: except bird resistant sorghums Sorghum regions are too dry? Conditions for mold growth? Physical traits of sorghum head? Genetic predispos sition?

Sorghum is too variable feeding f value >100% to < 90 0% vs corn

Test Weight & MEn in Broiler r Chicks kcal/kg 3,600 3535 3,535 3,478 3300 3,300 3,268 3,000 Normal (55 lb/bu) (45 Me edium lb/bu) Light (35 lb/bu)

Light Wt Milo - ADG Growing Rations 3 2.5 2 AD DG 15 1.5 1 05 0.5 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1991; Corn silage & alfalfa hay; 37% grain

Light Wt Milo F:G Growing Rations F: :G 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1991; Corn silage & alfalfa hay; 37% grain

Light Wt Milo - ADG Dry Rolled - Finishing Rations 3 2.5 2 AD DG 15 1.5 1 05 0.5 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1992; 1991 Dry rolled

Light Wt Milo F:G Dry Rolled - Finishing Rations F: :G 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1992; Dry rolled

Light Wt Milo - ADG SF - Finishing Rations 3.5 3 2.5 AD DG 2 1.5 1 05 0.5 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1991 1992

Light Wt Milo F:G SF - Finishing Rations 7 6 5 F: :G 4 3 2 1 0 55 45 35 KSU: 1992

Light Milo ADG Finishing Diets 35 3.5 3 25 2.5 ADG 2 15 1.5 1 05 0.5 0 45 58 KSU - 1971

Light Milo F:G Finishing Diets F:G 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 45 58 KSU - 1971

Light tes t wt Milo For Cattle: 40# = 60# More variable Extensive pro ocessing needed

Even with e xtremes in growing con nditions Only O l a 10% difference in feeding value of sorghum grain

Why the Discount? Cost of Processing Trash Non-uniform size Inconsistent nutrient content

Sorghum is difficult to process

Particle Size of Corn and 37.0 g Sorghum & ADG in Broilers 33.5 30.0 -size quad (P < 0.01) vs S x P-size lin (P < 0.02) 900 700 SE 0.3 Corn Sorghum 500 300

Particle Size of Milo ADG Grower die ets in Cattle 3.7 3.65 36 3.6 ADG 3.55 3.5 3.45 3.4 DRC Coarse Med Fine KSU, 1997 35% Grain

Particle Size of Milo F:G Grower diets in Cattle 8 b ab 7.5 a a F:G 7 6.5 6 DRC Coarse Med Fine KSU, 1997 35% Grain

Particle Size of Milo F:G Grower diets in Cattle 16 14 % Imp proveme ent 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Coarse Med Fine KSU, 1997 35% Grain

What s It Worth? 16% 20 lbs/ /d 2.84/cwt 150 days = $13.63 / head Or = 45 / cwt Sorghum

Wh hy? Starch is surrounded with a tight protei n web Starch Protein Enzyme/ Bacteria

advantage a e in feeding val lue for corn vs so rghum improper (t too coarse) grinding of fthe sorghum grain

An advantage

An advantage Ruminal Digestion = Acid Pro oduction

An advantage Wheat Barley HM Corn Flaked Corn DR Corn Flaked Milo Whole Corn DR Milo Fastest WDG? Slowest

Blending DR Milo with HMC Finishin g Diets 3.25 3.2 ADG 315 3.15 3.1 3.05 3 100 HMC 70-30 50-50 100 DRM UN-L 1987

Blending DR Milo with HMC 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 66 6.6 Finishin ng Diets 6.4 6.2 100 HMC 70-30 50-50 100 DRM F:G UN-L 1987

Steam Flaking Extremely effe ective in sorghum-base ed diets for ruminants Feedlot DairyD i

Effects of Steam Flaking on ADG: Corn vs Sorghum 2.8 2.7 AD DG 2.6 Corn Sorgum 2.5 Dry Rolled Flaked ale, 1980

Effects of Steam Flaking on F:G: Corn vs Sorghum 7.5 7 6.5 6 Corn Sorgum 5.5 5 Dry Rolled Flaked ale, 1980

Effects of Corn vs Sorghum Finishin g cattle 5.5 5 4.5 4 SF Corn SF Milo 3.5 ADG FG F:G SU, 1992

Effects of Corn vs Sorghum Da airy 76 75 FCM 3.5% 74 73 72 71 70 SF Corn SF Milo Z, 1999

If Steam Flaked: No performance difference in Feedlot or Dairy

Poor nut tritional value of coproducts

Nutrient Conten of DDGS from Corn and Sorghums Corn Bronze Yellow Item Grain DDGS Grain DDGS Grain DDGS Dry matter, % 91.9 90.3 91.9 90.4 91.9 88.9 CP, % Crude fat, % Crude fiber, % GE, Mcal/kg 8.0 3.9 3.2 4.00 23.9 8.1 11.0 4.555 9.8 3.0 2.6 4.20 26.6 8.1 8.5 4.53 9.3 3.0 2.4 3.98 25.6 8.0 9.5 4.33 Lysine, % Threonine, % Met + Cys, % 029 0.29 0.28 0.42 059 0.59 0.777 0.95 021 0.21 0.24 0.32 060 0.60 0.87 1.00 025 0.25 0.29 0.35 055 0.55 0.79 0.93

Nutrient Content of DDGS from Corn and Sorghum Item Corn DD DGS Bronze DDGS Dry matter, % 90.3 90.4

Nutrient Content of DDGS from Corn and Sorghum Item Dry matter, % Corn DD DGS 90.3 Bronze DDGS 90.4 CP, % 239 3.9 26.66

Nutrient Content of DDGS from Corn and Sorghum Item Dry matter, % CP, % Crude fat, % Corn DD DGS 90.3 239 3.9 8.1 Bronze DDGS 90.4 26.66 8.1

Nutrient Content of DDGS from Corn and Sorghum Item Dry matter, % CP, % Crude fat, % Corn DD DGS 90.3 239 3.9 8.1 Bronze DDGS 90.4 26.66 8.1 Crude fiber, % 11.0 8.5

Nutrient Content of DDGS from Corn and dsorghum C orn Bronze Item DDGS DDGS Lysine, % 059 0.59 060 0.60 Threonine, % 0.77 0.87 Met + Cys, % 0.95 1.00

MEn of DDGS in Broiler kcal/kg Chicks 2,866 2,677 2,238238 2000 Corn Bronze Yellow orn vs sorghums x grains vs DDGS (P < 0.10) SE 180

Feeding Value of Co-products Sorghum DDGS similar to corn DDGS for MEn in broilers lower lysine availabilit ty No negative effects on growth performance: nursery pigs 20 to 30% DDGS finishing pigs 60% DDGS

Nutritional Value of Corn and Sorghum Silages* Silage type DM % CP % Corn, well eared Corn, droughty Grain sorghum NEg Mcal/lb *Relative Energy Value 33 81 8.1.47 100% 30 9-10.35-.43 75-90% 38 9.5.42 89% * Kuhl et al., KSU 1993.

Nutritional Value of Corn and Sorghum Silages* Silage type DM % CP % Forage Sorghums: NEg Mcal/lb *Relative Energy Value High grain 32 7.8.38 81% Med. Grain 29 7.2.34 72% Low grain 26 62 6.2.28 60% Sorghum Sudan 30 10.0.28 60% * Kuhl et al., KSU 1993.

Nutritional Value of Corn and Sorghum Silage type CP % Corn, well eared Corn, droughty Grain sorghum Silages* *Relative Energy Value 81 8.1 100% 9-1 0 75-90% 95 9.5 89% * Kuhl et al., KSU 1993.

Nutritional Value of Corn and Sorghum Silage type Forage Sorghums: High grain Med. Grain Low grain Silages* CP % *Relative Energy Value 78 7.8 81% 7.2 72% 6.2 60% * Kuhl et al., KSU 1993.

Resources poured into improving corn

NGSPA and State Commodity Commissions Loyalists in industry INTSORMIL programs Public research Sorghum g Impro vement Center at KSU

Summary: Sorghum has equal perf. to corn: Ruminants, Swin ne, and Poultry Extensive Processing needed >40# test weigh t = 60# for feedlot cattle Higher processin ng cost and mgmt By-products have equal value to corn by-products Ruminants, swine,,poultry