Consumer Perception Study Research Report 3/9/16

Similar documents
NO TO ARTIFICIAL, YES TO FLAVOR: A LOOK AT CLEAN BALANCERS

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

The National Pork Board Pork Champion Quantitative Study Spring RAC 2014

Awareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary

2017 Food Attitudes & Behaviors

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

Oregon Wine Board Consumer Study. December 18, 2015

Consumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based Milks Phase II. January 14, 2019

US Chicken Consumption. Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC

Hispanic Retail Pilot Test Summary

Informing Wineries Tourism Decisions: Studies of Tasting Room Visitors and Wine Tourism Collaboration

Report Brochure. Mexico Generations Re p o r t. REPORT PRICE GBP 2,000 AUD 3,800 USD 2,800 EUR 2,600 4 Report Credits

Perceptions of Privatization

Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute College of Human Sciences Texas Tech University CONSUMER ATTITUDES TO TEXAS WINES

WINE OPINIONS PANEL CONSUMER RESEARCH SURVEY RESULTS

SPARKLING WINE IN THE UK MARKET. September 2018 Report

Leverage the Rising Sustainability Wave

Wine On-Premise UK 2016

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Customer Survey Summary of Results March 2015

Colorado Wine Board Quantitative Wine User Research II. Final Report ~ August 21, 2015

Update : Consumer Attitudes

The following summarises the key findings of the Fairtrade and Sustainable Food survey. The findings of the summary can be found in Appendix 1.

MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME. Term-End Examination June, MS-68 : MANAGEMENT OF MARKETING COMMUNICATION AND ADVERTISING (L)

News English.com Ready-to-use ESL / EFL Lessons

BREWERS ASSOCIATION CRAFT BREWER DEFINITION UPDATE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. December 18, 2018

Supply & Demand for Lake County Wine Grapes. Christian Miller Lake County MOMENTUM April 13, 2015

GLOBALIZATION UNIT 1 ACTIVATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

The following slides collate the insights relating to food and drink only.

The Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018

Executive Summary. N.C. Customers Give Their Local ABC Liquor Stores High Marks, Identify Ways to Improve Customer Service.

SPARKLING WINE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET

The University of Georgia

Report Brochure LOWER ALCOHOL WINES MAY 2012 CONSUMER INSIGHTS FROM THE UK MARKET. REPORT PRICE: GBP 500 or 1 Report Credit

STATE OF THE INDUSTRY 2017 wine sales trends & a deep dive into the Oregon Wine Consumer. Christian Miller Proprietor, Full Glass Research

Students, ethical purchasing and Fairtrade

Deliver a comprehensive communications campaign to increase coffee consumption on a pre-competitive basis across the category

Summary Report Survey on Community Perceptions of Wine Businesses

Lake County in the Marketplace. Christian Miller Lake County Winegrape Commission Momentum Seminar January 23, 2014

Bottling Wine and Spirits in a Changing Climate. 17 May 2011

Opportunities. SEARCH INSIGHTS: Spotting Category Trends and. thinkinsights THE RUNDOWN

Final Report. The Lunchtime Occasion in Republic of Ireland and Great Britain

Click to edit Master title style Delivering World-Class Customer Service Through Lean Thinking

MOBILE APP PROPOSAL. by Michael Cowley. October 2015 DGM Trudy Christensen

U.S. Hispanics and their Purchase, Consumption and Brand Preferences with regard to Avocados

Report Brochure P O R T R A I T S U K REPORT PRICE: GBP 2,500 or 5 Report Credits* UK Portraits 2014

The Urban Bourbon Trail Information & Application Packet

Roya Survey Developers Bil Doyle Brad Johns Greg Johnson Robin McNal y Kirsti Wal Graduate Consultant Mohammad Sajib Al Seraj Avinash Subramanian

WINE INDUSTRY The Time is Ripe

OKANAGAN VALLEY WINE CONSUMER RESEARCH STUDY 2008 RESULTS

News English.com Ready-to-use ESL / EFL Lessons

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

FAST FOOD & FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES STUDY. October 2018

Results from the First North Carolina Wine Industry Tracker Survey

Photo by Ricki Van Camp (with permission). Introduction

Chicken Usage Summary

18 May Primary Production Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington

A CASE STUDY: HOW CONSUMER INSIGHTS DROVE THE SUCCESSFUL LAUNCH OF A NEW RED WINE

Food Allergy Community Needs Assessment INDIANAPOLIS, IN

+ + + =? Which Winery should you visit? ABOUT WHICHWINERY THE BACKGROUND FIND. TRACK. SHARE. LEARN.

FBA STRATEGIES: HOW TO START A HIGHLY PROFITABLE FBA BUSINESS WITHOUT BIG INVESTMENTS

Table of Contents. Contact Information

FINE DINING SURVEY Great British Chefs. All rights reserved

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

Portraits. W i n e I n t e l l i ge n c e. C h i n a China Portraits 2017

SOUTH KOREAN WINE MARKET LANDSCAPE REPORT OCTOBER 2017

EVANGELISM AND THE AMAZING SPREAD OF QUALITY REPUTATION OF ONTARIO WINEMAKING

Wine Elite. WineElite.org. Corporate Clients and Special Events. Sommelier-Guided Wine Tasting Experiences. www.

FAIRTRADE UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE AWARD JOANNA MILIS EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS MANAGER, FAIRTRADE FOUNDATION JO KEMP PROGRAMME MANAGER, NUS

Consumer Preferences Trends

Starbucks / Dunkin Donuts research. Presented by Alex Hockley and Molly Fox. Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Napa Valley Vintners Teaching Winery Napa Valley College Marketing and Sales Plan February 14, 2018

Foodservice EUROPE. 10 countries analyzed: AUSTRIA BELGIUM FRANCE GERMANY ITALY NETHERLANDS PORTUGAL SPAIN SWITZERLAND UK

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

The University Wine Course: A Wine Appreciation Text & Self Tutorial PDF

News English.com Ready-to-use ESL/EFL Lessons by Sean Banville

The British Pub What Does the Future Hold?

The Rise of Pop-Up Dining Events and the Experiential Diner

New from Packaged Facts!

The China Wine Barometer (CWB): a look into the future

CENTER TRT EVALUATION PLAN. Kaiser Permanente Worksite Cafeteria Menu Labeling. Evaluation Plan:

Introduction to the Practical Exam Stage 1. Presented by Amy Christine MW, DC Flynt MW, Adam Lapierre MW, Peter Marks MW

Team Harvard Ecureuils Harvard University

Hardly anyone knows Alsatian wine as well as Anne Trimbach. Despite her youth, she is the

Project 4: Restaurants

What s the Best Way to Evaluate Benefits or Claims? Silvena Milenkova SVP of Research & Strategic Direction

CHINA CONSUMER RESEARCH

INDULGENCE 2018 TREND INSIGHT REPORT

100 Days of Real Food Cookbook Review

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

Seriously, CELIAC. talk.

Getting Started Packet

Pecans. The Consumer Speaks A consumer A&U study on Pecans 9/09/11

QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT SERIES EVENT PARTICIPANT INSTRUCTIONS

Colorado Wine Board Quantitative Wine User Research. Final Report ~ May 24, 2017

LEVEL: BEGINNING HIGH

Date: April 15, Holly Henry From: Daniel DeVries Results from New York survey.

COONAWARRA CABERNET SYMPOSIUM

Wine Writers Symposium. Meadowood, February 19, 2014

Feasibility report on best fast food options on University Drive in Denton, Texas.

Transcription:

Consumer Perception Study Research Report 3/9/16

OBJECTIVE Better understand consumer perceptions of Ohio wines and wineries. 2

METHODOLOGY Stakeholders Secondary Qualitative Quantitative 3

Stakeholders 90-minute phone interviews with key stakeholders Retailers: Dana Murray: Beer, Wine, and Liquor Merchandising Specialist Distributors: Casey Forbes, Owner of Vintage Distributing Associations: Donniella Winchell, Executive Director, Ohio Wine Producers Association Wineries: Bill Bakan, Owner of Maize Valley Winery Jim Arbaczewski, Sales Manager at Ferrante Winery & Ristorante Adrian Salvador, Marketing Manager of FirelandsWinery Donna Roberts, Owner of Terra Cotta Vineyards Allison and Blaine Davidson, Owners of Hocking Hills Winery Robin Coolidge, Owner of Wyandotte Winery 4

Secondary 5

Qualitative Six 90-minute focus groups with six respondents per group Columbus and Independence, Ohio December 8 & 9, 2015 A mix of age, race, gender, and wine consumption habits Three types of consumers were recruited into three distinct groups. Group 1: Non-Ohio Wine Drinkers/Ohio Winery Visitors o Have not visited an Ohio winery in the last 18 months Group 2: Moderate Ohio Wine Drinkers/Ohio Winery Visitors o Visited an Ohio winery one to four times over the last 18 months Group 3: Heavy Ohio Wine Drinkers/Ohio Winery Visitors o Visited an Ohio winery five or more times over the last 18 months 6

Quantitative A 24-question survey to 600 consumers in the OGIC database. Focus on wine purchasing behavior, winery experiences, Ohio wines, Ohio wineries, wine tools and demographics. Three cross-tabs were created: High Frequency: Drink wine more than two times per week; visited 5+ Ohio wineries Medium Frequency: Drink wine between twice per month and twice per week, visited one to four Ohio wineries Young People: 21 to 34 years old 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

KEY FINDINGS Not enough consumers realize there are Ohio wineries near where they live and work. This lack of awareness is our number-one challenge to overcome. Overall, respondents rated Ohio wines and Ohio wineries very favorably both on their own and in comparison to other states. o Stakeholders were less complimentary and often focused on Ohio s pink/sweet wines. We did not hear this at all from consumers in qualitative or quantitative research. Our high-and medium-frequency cross-tabs are very similar. It s probably fair to consider them as one marketing cohort. 9

KEY FINDINGS While consumers could use more information to help them make a wine selection at shelf, we should tread lightly. Too much information could be perceived as overbearing and overwhelming. Sweet versus dry is often one of the first decision making criteria our consumers are considering at shelf. Our consumers are motivated to buy local products. There s an opportunity to better define and market Ohio wines as local. The experience is as important as the wine itself at wineries. We received a lot of positive feedback here; it s likely one of the reasons respondents rate their Ohio Winery experiences so well. 10

WINE PURCHASING BEHAVIOR

PURCHASING BEHAVIOR WHEN AND WHERE Q7: How often do you purchase a bottle of wine? Medium Total High Frequency Frequency Young People n=602 n=255 n=71 n=69 Less than once per month 38.42% 29.53% 40.30% 31.88% 1 One to two times per month 40.44% 37.80% 55.22% 53.62% Three to five times per month 14.43% 20.08% 4.48% 10.14% More than five times per month 6.71% 12.60% 0% 4.35% We re not talking to super-heavy users. Our audience is buying a bottle of wine once or twice per month. 1. Nearly 80% of respondents buy fewer than two bottles of wine per month. 12

PURCHASING BEHAVIOR WHEN AND WHERE Q6: When/where do you purchase wine? (Check all that apply.) Total High Frequency Medium Frequency Young People n=602 n=255 n=71 n=69 When I'm at a winery 91.1% 92.13% 86.57% 86.96% 1 When I'm shopping 2 for groceries 71.8% 73.23% 80.60% 94.20% Restaurant 40.6% 43.70% 41.79% 49.28% I usually make a separate trip to purchase wine. 27.9% 31.10% 28.36% 23.19% Other (please specify) 7.2% 12.20% 0.00% 1.45% Monthly subscription service 5.7% 6.30% 5.97% 8.70% Online store 4.2% 3.54% 7.46% 4.35% At winery presents the biggest opportunity for Ohio wine sales, with at big-box retailer as the next biggest purchase occasions for us to target. 1. Far and away, respondents are purchasing wine at wineries and during typical shopping trips. 2. Young people are very likely to weave wine purchasing into their routine, up 30% from an already high total. We asked people about their general wine purchases not their Ohio wine purchases due to their mindsets when shopping. They re rarely thinking about Ohio wine when not at a winery. To change this behavior will require changes in marketing. Recommendation: Focus on winery sales first and retail sales second. This is where the volume is. 13

PURCHASING BEHAVIOR DECISION MAKING CRITERIA Q8: When purchasing wine, please indicate the importance of the following factors. (5-point scale) Total Sweet or dry 4.6 Type (Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Moscato) 4.4 Price 4.1 Color 3.5 Brand 3.5 Origin (France, California, Ohio, etc.) 3.3 Pairing with food 3.2 Where it's sold (grocery store, wine specialty store, winery) 3.1 Sweet versus dry is typically where respondents start when making a wine choice at shelf. In qualitative, we asked respondents to participate in a card-sort exercise to help us understand the key decision making factors that are top-of-mind as they make a wine choice. Quantitative results echoed what we heard in groups. Most popular answers included: Sweet versus dry Type (e.g. Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Moscato) Price Factors like food pairings garnered some negative reactions because respondents felt too dictated to and limited by those results. Recommendation: Keep wine selection tool language soft and approachable. Consumers should feel guided, not forced into a type of wine to drink. 14

PURCHASING BEHAVIOR TOOLS SHOULD BE SIMPLE In qualitative, we showed respondents an array of tools designed to make wine selection simpler. Many tools can be overwhelming and their usefulness can vary based on the current need state. Less information is generally best. I m overwhelmed with all of the words. I m going to eat the food I like and drink the wine I like whether some snob in California says it s right, I don t care. Overall, consumers don t want tools to tell them what to do they re just looking for a little bit of guidance. 15

PURCHASING BEHAVIOR TOOLS SHOULD BE SIMPLE Q9: Please indicate how useful each material would be in the wine aisle when you're choosing a wine. (5-point scale) High Medium Young Total Frequency Frequency People n=602 n=255 n=71 n=69 A tool to help understand what different wines taste like by listing wines in order from sweet 1 to dry 4.23 4.18 4.3 4.3 A tool to help pair wines with food choices 3.56 3.5 3.69 3.77 A tool to help understand what different wines taste like based on wines I've already tried, or might like 4.05 4.03 4.1 4.25 A smartphone app to help choose a wine I'd like and select favorites 3.59 3.45 3.93 4.36 A shelving organization that sets apart/calls attention to local or regional wines 4.09 4.14 4.07 4.3 Stickers or shelf signs that indicate consumer favorites and/or best-selling wines 3.67 3.62 3.7 3.9 2 In theory, quantitative respondents are open to the idea of tools, but still, simplicity is key. 1. Respondents react favorably to the idea of evaluating wines on a sweet versus dry scale. 2. Young people are most interested in a tool that leverages new technology, like a smartphone app. Recommendation: Keep tools simple. Explore signage with retail partners that focuses on easy to understand topics like sweet versus dry or local favorites. Recommendation: Cost of entry probably rules out an app, but it could be worth considering a partnership with an already existing popular wine selection app/site/service. 16

OHIO WINES: QUALITY

OHIO WINES OHIO HAS GOOD QUALITY WINES Q17: Please indicate how you feel about the quality of Ohio wines. (1 = not as good, 5 = about the same, 10 = better) High Medium Young Total Frequency Frequency People n=602 n=255 n=71 n=69 How would you rate the quality of 1 Ohio wines compared to wines from other states? 6.93 6.82 6.64 6.90 Ohio wine is as good as the wine from Pennsylvania and New York. Consumers across each of our segments, seem to appreciate the quality of Ohio wine more than stakeholders do. 1. Each segment has Ohio well above the 5-point about the same as other wines mark. This echoes what we heard in qualitative, with very positive comments across all groups about Ohio wines and winery experiences. This is a stark contrast to our conversations with stakeholders, who repeatedly expressed concern for the quality of wine made in Ohio. When stakeholders did give praise to Ohio wines, it was typically for pink/sweet varietals, and still couched with the perception that Ohio wines do not compare favorably to those made in California and New York. 18

OHIO WINES OHIO HAS GOOD QUALITY WINES Digging deeper, Ohio gets credit for both its sweet and dry wines. Q19: Please rate how much you agree or disagree with each statement. (5-point scale) Total High Frequency Medium Frequency Young People Ohio produces both quality sweet and dry 1 wines. 4.19 4.16 4.14 4.16 Ohio wines are too sweet. 2.51 2.63 2.56 2.56 Sweet wines are for 2 the immature palate. 2.43 2.58 2.33 2.43 1. This is another stark difference versus stakeholders, who told us Ohio does sweet but not dry well due to the grapes that can be grown here. Consumers across segments do not see a difference in the quality of Ohio sweet versus dry wines. 2. There s also not as much of a negative perception wrapped up in sweet wines when we talk to consumers versus stakeholders. Recommendation: Don t be apologetic, be proud of your wines! The myth of California and European wines is overplayed. It depends on what you like! 19

OHIO WINES QUALITY IS SUBJECTIVE Q19: Please rate how much you agree or disagree with each statement. (5-point scale) Total People should drink what they like, not what the experts tell them to drink. 1 4.66 Wine is subjective. It's all about a person's taste preferences. 4.47 It s all about what tastes good to you. Don t tell me what to like! Consumers reacted negatively to wine selection tools that were too heavy handed. 1. Consumers don t see quality as a scientific equation. It s personal and unique to everyone. This is true with on shelf/bottle stickers and awards for the best wines and for wine selection tools, particularly those based on a food-pairing model, which made it easy for consumers to feel out of place and/or judged. Recommendation: Take care to keep wine recommendations from feeling overbearing or overwhelming. Recommendation: Consider how we talk about the Ohio Quality Wine Program. The word quality may be confusing and we may be causing undue harm to the perception of wineries who don t grow their own grapes. 20

OHIO WINES CONSUMERS HAVE A POSITIVE VIEW OF THE OHIO WINE INDUSTRY Ohio has some very good wines and some very good value wines. I ve visited many wineries. I still can t say I ve had a bad Ohio wine experience. Ohio wineries produce some of the best sweet wine in the market. 21

OHIO WINES BRAND FAMILIARITY IS MIDDLING Consumers are only somewhat aware of the Ohio Wines Love At First Sip brand. Q20: Are you aware of the "Ohio Wines Love at First Sip" program. Total High Frequency Medium Frequency Young People Yes 36.8% 43.3% 28.1% 20.3% No 44.3% 1 34.8% 54.7% 66.7% I'm not sure 19.0% 21.9% 17.2% 13.0% Q21: Have you seen/noticed this logo before? Total High Frequency Medium Frequency Young People Yes 2 70.38% 76.11% 76.56% 63.77% No 16.20% 12.55% 14.06% 18.84% I'm not sure 13.41% 11.34% 9.38% 17.39% 1. Just more than one-third of respondents are aware of the Ohio Wines Love at First Sip name, although it does perform better with more than 43% of high frequency respondents aware. 2. The logo performs better with just more than 70% of respondents agreeing reporting they ve seen the logo before. Keep in mind, this survey is made-up of Ohio Wines VIP members, who we would expect to have a relatively high awareness of the brand. Recommendation: Build more awareness of Ohio wineries in addition to corresponding brands and programs. 22

THE LOCAL MOVEMENT

THE LOCAL MOVEMENT WHAT DOES LOCAL MEAN? The grapes have to be grown here for the wine to be local. I guess if the wine is produced in Ohio, then it s local. Local doesn t have one clear, defined meaning, but it could be a purchase driver if leveraged well. When we asked respondents what made a wine local, there was a fair amount of agreement that the grapes needed to be grown here. However, when we leveraged beer as an analogous industry, respondents turned more thoughtful and wondered if the definition of local could be applied more broadly than in their initial reaction. It s local if it creates jobs in Ohio. If it said it was from here, I might be willing to try it! 24

THE LOCAL MOVEMENT WHAT DOES LOCAL MEAN? Q10: When thinking about non-wine purchases, how do you define shopping local? Check all that apply. Total When I buy from a non-chain store owned/operated by someone who lives in a city/town/neighborhood near me 1 65.20% When a product is produced or manufactured in my city/town/neighborhood 65.03% When a product is produced from materials grown in my city/town/neighborhood 53.72% I'm not sure/i haven't given much thought to what makes a product local. 13.34% Other 2.53% Q11: When thinking about general non-wine purchases you make, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. (5-point scale) Total Supporting local businesses and businessperson is important to me. 4.42 I am proud when I'm able to shop local and support local businesses. 4.48 I'm wary of buying local because sometimes local products aren't of the same quality as non-local products. 2.2 When buying local, it's not just about buying the product, it's about supporting the person/company who made/produced the product. 4.33 2 There isn t one agreed upon definition of what makes a product local. Still, our target cares about shopping local and supporting local businesses. 1. Consumers are most likely to attach the idea of local to the store/business they buy from, but there are also high percentages of respondents attributing locality to where a product is manufactured, and even where materials for a product are grown. 2. Respondents strongly agree with feelings like proud and important when probed about shopping local, while not expecting a dropoff in product quality. 25

THE LOCAL MOVEMENT WHAT DOES LOCAL WINE MEAN? Q12: Thinking about wine, please indicate how much you agree with the following statements. (5-point scale) Total To be an Ohio-wine, wine must be produced in Ohio. 4.48 2 To be an Ohio wine, wine must be made from Ohio grapes. 3.71 To be an Ohio wine, wine must be produced in Ohio and made from Ohio grapes. 3.68 I haven't thought about it/i'm not sure how exactly a wine should be defined as an Ohio wine. 2.48 All else equal, I'd be more likely to support local businesses by purchasing a wine from Ohio than purchasing a wine from a 1 faraway state or country. 4.04 All else equal, I'd be more likely to purchase a wine from a Midwestern, neighboring state than from a faraway state or 3 country. 3.48 For wine, local could be a purchase driver. 1. Qualitative research revealed many consumers don t see origin linked to quality of the wine and don t think about local at the wine shelf because it hasn t been a dominant message. 2. Consumers overwhelmingly and strongly agree that if a wine is produced in Ohio, it can be labeled as a local Ohio wine. They are less concerned about the ingredients. 3. Ohio is more powerful than Midwestern. Recommendation: Better define and own the word local and how it relates to Ohio wines. 26

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE CONSUMERS LOVE OHIO WINERIES Q5: Thinking about your typical trips to Ohio wineries, how satisfied are you with the overall experience? (10-point scale) Total High Frequency Medium Frequency Young People How satisfied are you with your typical Ohio winery 1 experience? 8.50 8.54 8.20 8.45 Consumers are very satisfied with their typical Ohio winery experience. 1. Across all segments, respondents rate their satisfaction with Ohio wineries extremely well, well above an eight on a 10-point scale. Recommendation: Consider how to leverage advocates to reach new customers. 28

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE IT S ABOUT MORE THAN WINE I like to see from grape to bottle. Consumers are looking for a full experience when visiting a winery, one that goes beyond the wine they re drinking. This was evident in the quotes we heard from consumers in qualitative. I want to see the production it makes me appreciate the wine more. Some wineries just have beautiful landscapes that s why I go to just take some time out and appreciate nature. They had live music, a concert; I want to go back again. 29

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE IT S ABOUT MORE THAN WINE Consumers are looking for a full experience when visiting a winery, one that goes beyond the wine that they re drinking. The importance of the experience was also evident in the pictures respondents selected (from about 100) to help bring to life how they feel when they drink wine. Repeatedly and across groups, we saw themes like festive, easy, relaxing, and friends and family come to the top. 30

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE IT S ABOUT MORE THAN WINE Q14: How important is each type of education at a winery? Total Learning about the different types of wines 4.31 Learning about the history of the winery 4.13 Learning about the different types of grapes 4.06 Learning about how the wine is made 3.94 Learning about the people who make the wine 3.85 Learning about the history of the Ohio wine industry 3.68 Learning about food pairings 3.59 Consumers are looking for a full experience when visiting a winery, one that goes beyond the wine they re drinking. Via the quantitative results, it s evident that respondents are interested in more education across the board, which we seem to be delivering very well, based on the strong ratings received. 31

THE WINERY EXPERIENCE TOO FEW PEOPLE ARE AWARE We d definitely go more often if there were more wineries near where I work or live. (In response to the location map in the Love At First Sip magazine) Wait, there are this many wineries in Ohio? I had no idea! Respondents were in disbelief when we revealed (at the end of groups) that there are more than 200 wineries in Ohio, and that there were (in most cases) several wineries within a 20 minute drive from respondents homes and work places. Recommendation: Build awareness of the wineries in Ohio. 32

MOVING FORWARD

RECOMMENDATIONS Awareness: The biggest opportunity is that consumers don t know there are 220+ Ohio wineries or that so many are typically located so close to where they live/work. We need to drive awareness that these wineries exist, either in individual markets or via corresponding brands like Ohio Wines Love at First Sip. Leverage Advocates: Qualitative and quantitative results make it clear there is a strong base of advocates. We should identify advocates, intentionally capture reviews and testimonials from them, and leverage their stories with new/lapsed audiences to help build top-of-mind awareness and drive those audiences to wineries. 34

RECOMMENDATIONS Education: Begin to unlock for consumers what the term local means for wine. Test local messaging in marketing and test local messaging and/or shelving setups/sections at retailers (as possible). Focus: At winery is our best opportunity to drive more interest in and consumption of Ohio wines. At retail presents another high volume opportunity, and while consumers are not necessarily reaching retail shelf with Ohio wines top of mind, we could leverage several marketing tactics to more strongly feature Ohio wines at shelf. At winery and at retail are where marketing efforts should focus, as it s where we can drive the most scale and best efficiency. 35

THANK YOU