Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluations of Tri-State Varieties. RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden

Similar documents
Proposed Potato Variety Release

2016 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations

WILLAMETTE (AO )

List of Potatoes 1 st OSU Potato Tasting Day October 26 th, 2006

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Volume XVI, Number 15 4 November Litchi tomato is expected not to be a significant inoculum source for V. dahliae and Colletotrichum coccodes.

2017 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations

Red-Skinned and Chipping Potato Variety Development Kenneth A. Rykbost and Brian A. Charlton 1 A

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

2018 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

Strawberry Variety Trial

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

2015 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Sensory Evaluations of Advanced Specialty Potato Selections

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

1999 Annual Report. RED-SKINNED AND CHIPPING POTATO VARIETY DEVELOPMENT K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton 1

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials

Organic Seed Partnership

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Sweetpotato. Mississippi VARIETY EVALUATIONS, Bulletin 1212 December 2014 GEORGE M. HOPPER, DIRECTOR

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

RESEARCH REPORT - OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION. Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

Klamath Basin Potato Variety Development Summary

Mountain Gem Russet: a Potato Variety with High Early and Full Season Yield Potential and Excellent Fresh Market and Early Processing Characteristics

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO (CONT) 2014 Annual Report

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

/s Springer. Version of Record

POTATOES USA / SNAC-INTERNATIONAL OUT-OF-STORAGE CHIP QUALITY MICHIGAN REGIONAL REPORT

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

Table of Contents Introduction Materials and Methods Results

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

Testing of Early Ripening Strawberry Cultivars Tolerant to Soil-Borne Pathogens as Alternative to Elsanta

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Sprouting in Storage

High Tunnel Crops. Shubin K. Saha D.P.M., Ph.D., Extension Vegetable Specialist Department of Horticulture University of Kentucky

Field Evaluations of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) Resistant Varieties for Commercial Production

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Varieties catalogue 2013

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY


NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Evaluation of Seedless Watermelon Varieties for Production in Southwest Indiana, 2010

1

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Pre- and Postharvest 1-MCP Technology for Apples

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

Yield and Quality of Spring-Planted, Day-Neutral Strawberries in a High Tunnel

A.M.Z. Chamango 1, Gomonda, R.W.J. 1, Mainjeni, C.E.D. 1, Msangosoko K.R. 1 and Kumwenda, R.L.N. 1

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

SEEDLESS WATERMELON VARIETY TRIAL, Shubin K. Saha, Extension Vegetable Specialist University of Kentucky

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Blackberry Growth Cycle and New Varieties from the University of Arkansas. Alejandra A. Salgado and John R. Clark March 13 th, 2015 Virginia

Transcription:

Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluatio of Tri-State Varieties RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden

The Dominant Fresh Variety: Russet Norkotah Product of North Dakota State University Released in 1987 Dominant fresh pack variety

Why Has Russet Norkotah done Eye Appeal Uniform tuber shape Ideal tuber size profile so well? Yields are adequate seaso Bruise resistance relative to other varieties Economic Return Everybody in the chain makes money

Why Look For Alternatives? Norkotah is Susceptible to Potato Virus Y Seed certification is difficult Reduced yields Susceptible to Verticillium Wilt Early Die Flesh color and flavor poor after cold storage Newer varieties have shown promise

A superior variety will have Ideal fresh pack characteristics Eye appeal, ideal size, shape, yield and quality Better disease resistance Adequate yields, superior economic return Excellent culinary attributes Storability Looks/tastes good out of storage Bruise resistance

2 Trials Methods & Materials Early Harvest (14 days after planting) Late Harvest (15 days after planting Design RCBD Plots: 2 ft x 3 rows, 4 replicatio 6 control varieties 8 clones/new varieties

The Controls CO-3 CO-8 TX-278 TX-296 R. Norkotah R. Burbank

The Contenders A3158-2TE AO57-2 Classic R. AO9635-3 A11-1 Teton R. PAN14-2

Methods & Materials (cont.) Data Stand, stem, tuber number vine senescence US graded yields (weight & grade of every potato) Tuber shape, size profile, internal/external quality, bruising Economic value Taste panel testing Out of the field After 6 months of storage at 44 F

Fresh Market Economic Methods Electronic sizer Each potato weighed, US grades Industry size classes See chart to right 4 year average C. Basin prices Early Harvest July to Mid Aug Late Harvest October *Prices minus pack shed fee Package US 1 Size (oz) Price* ($/CWT) Poly bag 4. 7. 4.57 1 count 7. - 8.5 15.44 9 count 8.5-9.5 17.26 8 count 9.5-1.5 21.64 7 count 1.5 12.5 23.56 6 count 12.5 14. 23.59 5 count 14. 18. 23.26 Burlap bag >18 oz 5.69 Burlap bag Process culls US 2s >1oz 5.69 All other.

Taste Panel Scientific taste panel WSU Food Lab 5 panelists Aroma Taste/Flavor Texture Aftertaste Overall Acceptance Smoothness Moistness All parameters were rated on a 1-9 scale

211-13 Early Harvest Size Profile 2 15 1 5 Classic R. $9 $22 $28 $1 2 15 1 5 A3158-2TE 2 15 1 5 Teton R. 2 15 1 5 A11-1 2 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz PAN14-2 2 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz CO3 2 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz R. Norkotah 2 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz TX-278 15 1 5 15 1 5 15 1 5 15 1 5 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz TX-296 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz CO8 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz R. Burbank AO9635-3 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 2 15 1 5 AO57-2 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz

3 25 2 15 1 5 211-13 Late Harvest Size Profile Classic R. $11 $18 $21 $13 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 3 25 2 15 1 5 A3158-2TE 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 3 25 2 15 1 5 Teton R. 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 3 25 2 15 1 5 A11-1 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 3 PAN14-2 3 CO3 3 R. Norkotah 3 TX-278 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 3 TX-296 3 CO8 3 R. Burbank AO9635-3 3 AO57-2 3 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 25 2 15 1 5 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz 4-7 oz 7-1 oz 1-18 oz >18 oz

211-13 Early Harvest Fresh Pack Variety Trial Gross Return Difference from Standard R. Norkotah Gross Return Difference From R. Norkotah ($/A) 15 a 1 5-5 -1 b bc bc bc cd de ef f f f Classic R. A3158-2TE TX-278 Teton R. A11-1 TX-296 R. Norkotah CO-8 R. Burbank AO9635-3 PAN14-2 AO57-2 CO-3 cd

211-13 Late Harvest Fresh Pack Variety Trial Gross Return Difference from Standard R. Norkotah Gross Return Difference From R. Norkotah ($/A) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 a ab A11-1 A3158-2TE bc bcd bcd cde cde de TX-278 Classic R. CO-3 CO-8 R. Burbank Teton R. ef efg efg PAN14-2 TX-296 AO9635-3 gh AO57-2 R. Norkotah

211-13 At Harvest Taste Panel Results Variety Aroma STATS** Taste/Flavor STATS** Texture STATS** Aftertaste STATS** Acceptance STATS** PAN14-2 6.3733 A 6.568 A 6.617 AB 5.8897 AB 6.4276 A AO9635-3 6.1429 AB 6.619 BC 5.8958 CD 5.5957 ABC 5.9286 C A3158-2TE 6.6 AB 6.2929 AB 6.68 A 5.885 AB 6.3333 AB Teton R. 5.9664 BC 5.9933 BC 6.3933 AB 5.7931 AB 6.1611 ABC R. Burbank 5.9467 BC 6.336 BC 6.5533 AB 5.7143 AB 6.27 BC A11-1 5.8859 BC 6.64 BC 6.4228 AB 5.9315 A 6.1837 ABC R. Norkotah 5.8267 BC 5.7933 CD 6.5233 AB 5.6336 ABC 5.9212 C Classic R. 5.651 C 5.7584 CD 6.2617 BC 5.517 BC 5.8658 C AO57-2 5.661 C 5.41 D 5.63 D 5.2872 C 5.264 D ** Numbers followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Fisher's LSD Test. ***No toppings added ***Strai of R. Norkotah were not evaluated due to time and space cotraints

211-12 At Harvest vs. After Storage Taste Panel Results Changes after 6 months in Storage at 44 F Improved Declined Variety Aroma Taste/ Flavor Texture Aftertaste Overall Acceptance Teton R. A11-1 Classic R. R. Norkotah * PAN14-2 R. Burbank * Denotes significance α =.5 A3158-2TE AO57-2 AO9635-3

Potato Appearance & Texture Internal Color Preference 1 A B % of Panelists 8 6 4 2 a A b B 5 Texture Preference 4 % of Panelists 3 2 1 ***Based on respoes from 3 panelists Moist / Dee (1) 2 Creamy/Smooth (3) 4 Light/Fluffy (5) 6 Dry/Crumbly (7)

Take Home Message Despite low yields and high susceptibility to PVY, R. Norkotah is still the number one fresh pack variety in the US New Varieties are showing Better yields More uniform size distribution Better resistance to PVY, diseases, and pests Increased profits for growers Greater coumer satisfaction

Variety Recommendatio A3158-2TE Classic R. Teton R. Early to Late Harvest High percentage of 7-18oz tubers Fresh Market Standout High Gross Return Good skin set Early to Late Harvest High percentage of US #1 s Low incidence of internal defects Susceptible to shatter Bruise Early to mid-harvest Similar yields when compared to R. Norkotah, but with slightly heavier tubers Susceptible to shatter bruise Allow time for good skin set

Acknowledgements Mark Pavek Rick Knowles Bob Thornton Joe Guenthner WA State Potato Commission Washington State University Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Othello Crew Bart Connor Nora Olsen Carolyn Ross & Team (WSU Food Lab) Knowles crew Tom Cummings Jonathan Whitworth

Questio??