CERCOSPORA LEAFSPOT: IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL

Similar documents
Cercospora Leaf Spot Biology &Management. Oliver T. Neher

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 August 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

SMBSC OBSERVATIONS FOR 2019 VARIETIES 2019 FULL APPROVAL VARIETIES

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

EFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST BOTRYTIS ON GRAPES. THE ALTERNATIVE IN GRAPE PROTECTION

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 4 May 2015 Columbia, MO

Grape. Disease Control

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 11 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 17 August 2015 Columbia, MO

Fungal Fungal Disease Citrus Black Black Spot Guignardia Guignardia citricarpa ): Id I entifi f catio ion io, Biology Biology and and Control

Chris Smart. Plant Pathology and Plant- Microbe Biology Cornell University Geneva, NY

Management of cucurbit diseases in the panhandle: Notes for 2016

Pomegranate Diseases: What do we know and where are we heading? Achala KC and Gary Vallad FPA Grower s Meeting Wimauma, FL 03/04/2016

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

AGRABLAST and AGRABURST TREATMENT OF COFFEE FUNGUS AND BLACK SIGATOKA ON BANANAS

What went wrong. Pepper Sunscald. In this issue, find out what might have gone wrong with your vegetable harvest this season.

Scab Fusicladosporium carpophilum. Seasonal Scab Pressure. Items for Discussion. Petal fall, a critical stage of scab development (Dr. E.

Cold Climate Grape IPM

Plant Disease & Pest Management Guide Edition

MANAGEMENT OF SOYBEAN RUST IN ALABAMA

Chris Smart, Holly Lange, Amara Dunn, Lisa Jones and Maryn Carlson. Cornell University Geneva, NY

Harvest Aids in Soybeans - Application Timing and Value. J.L. Griffin, C.A. Jones, L.M. Etheredge, Jr., J. Boudreaux, and D.Y.

Melanie L. Lewis Ivey and Rachel Medina Fruit Pathology Program Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University-Wooster Campus Wooster, OH

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Peanut disease photos

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Recognizing Diseases of Pecan. Jason Brock Dept. of Plant Pathology University of Georgia Tifton, GA

Dry Beans XIII-5 Mexican Bean Beetle

Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU

Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot

California Certified Strawberry Nurseries: pathogens of regulatory significance for the Santa Maria area

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 21 May 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING XANTHOMONAS JUGLANDIS BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

Diagnosing Vegetable Problems

Topics to be covered: What Causes Fruit to Rot? Powdery Mildew. Black Rot. Black Rot (Continued)

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 3 August 2015 Columbia, MO

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

VegNet Vol. 11, No. 5, March 17, 2004

The NEW Benchmark Fungicide for Grape Growers. Grapes A GUIDE FOR GRAPE GROWERS. Superior Multi-Crop Control

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Products. Inspire Fungicide. About this Product. Uses. Technical Information. Tank Mixes. Application Information. Label and MSDS.

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center 1693 S 2700 W Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:

Technical Product Guide

Trends in diagnoses of soybean foliar disease for 2015 Karen Lackermann, DuPont Pioneer

Alternaria Diseases of Crucifers

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois Tree Fruit Schools 2,3 February 2016

Psa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards an observation by Callum Kay, 4 April 2011

Frogeye Leaf Spot SOYBEAN DISEASE MANAGEMENT

.. Acknowledgment _----_---~

Management of Pepper and Tomato Diseases

Waitea Patch: History, Identification and Control

Identifying Soybean Growth Stages

Late-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Ohio Cucurbit Downy Mildew Update by Sally

Problems affecting seeds and seedlings

Bacterial stem canker

New Disease in Oklahoma: Blackleg of Canola

Growing Healthy Christmas Trees

Management of Powdery Mildew in Beans 1

Soybean varieties. Excerpt from the Nutrition & Education International (NEI) Foundation Soybean Manual Soybean Botany

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2012 Research Report. Understanding foliar pest interactions for sustainable vine management

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

Management and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards

The art of powdery mildew control Technical Manual

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Major seed-borne diseases in Indonesia. A.S. Duriat & J.M. van der Wolf

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 September 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Recognizing and Managing Blueberry Diseases

Walnut Blight. Luke K. Milliron UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor Butte, Tehama, and Glenn Counties. November 7, 2018 UC Walnut Short Course

Downy Mildew Confirmed in Ohio Cucumbers

CONTENTS. First Printing 1M, August Auburn University is an equal opportunity educational institution/employer.

Lecture 4. Factors affecting ripening can be physiological, physical, or biotic. Fruit maturity. Temperature.

(80*) Upcoming Meetings/Events Date Meeting/Event Location Time Information. UMass Cold Spring Orchard, Belchertown

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 7 June 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 May 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Cankers. FRST 307 Fall 2017

2 Technical File SESVanderHave Leaf diseases

Field Crops Soybeans. Disease. Seedling Disease (Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora, Pythium, etc.)

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases and Updates on the Spray Guides. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois 3-4 February 2015

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 19 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station. in Sturgeon Bay, WI

Citrus Canker and Citrus Greening. Holly L. Chamberlain Smoak Groves AGRI-DEL, INC. Lake Placid, FL

Botanigard WP best practice application guide

SOYBEAN GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Transcription:

Partnership Of: Sugar Beet Growers Michigan Sugar Company Michigan State University Agribusiness CERCOSPORA LEAFSPOT: IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL Cercospora Leafspot fungus (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) causes one of the most widespread, destructive and economically significant diseases to sugar beets in the world. SPECIAL EDITION NEWSLETTER 2006

Page 2 Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Cercospora Leafspot with black fruiting bodies Early attacks occurring in July to August impact growth in terms of both tons per acre and sugar content. Uncontrolled Cercospora reduced yield by three tons per acre and sugar content by 1.8% NATURE OF THE INJURY The Cercospora leafspot fungus feeds on the sugar beet s sap, infecting portions of outer (older) leaves first. Subsequent loss of the whole leaf (or large leaf portions) interferes with normal root growth and sugar accumulation; decreased photosynthetic capacity lowers yield and sugar content. These are further lowered by energy expended to grow new leaves. The unnatural demand upon the sugar beet for new foliage prevents normal root development and sugar storage. This results in reduced yield, sugar content and juice purity of the root. The degree to which yield, sugar and juice purity are reduced depends on the severity; prolongation of the leafspot attack; and the time in the season when it occurs. Early prolonged attacks are the most damaging. Early attacks occurring in July into August impact growth in terms of both tons per acre and sugar content; late August and September attacks have more impact on sugar storage than on yield. A severe attack will reduce both yield and sugar content significantly. At harvest, the economic threshold occurs when 3% of the leaf surface is covered with spots. PATHOGEN The most common source of infection is the remains of diseased sugar beet leaves left in the field. Prior year s residue harbors over-wintering stromata, which form conidia. These conidia produce spores which enter the leaves through the stomata. Once inside intracellular spaces, spores continue to propogate, release toxin (cercosporin) and cause leaky cells. Infection may also come from other host plants such as common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, curly dock, prickly lettuce and dandelion. Splashing rains and to some extent, wind, are additional means of spreading the disease. CAUSE Increased incidence of Cercospora leafspot is favored by high temperatures and periods of high humidity or free moisture on the leaves (i.e. rain showers, heavy dews, lingering fog or saturated soils). Environmental conditions for Cercospora to develop rapidly are day (air) temperatures of 75 o F to 95 o F accompanied by night (air) temperatures above 60 o F, coupled with greater than 90% relative humidity. Very little infection occurs below 59 o F. Ideal growth conditions are 80 o F to 90 o F air temperature with greater than 96% relative humidity for more than 8.5 hours (10 to 12 hours per day for three to five days). Actual visual symptoms (spots) do not develop until 5 to 21 days later. This fungus does not need sunlight to grow; it can grow in the dark. SYMPTOMS Recent research indicates at 77-82 o it took ten days to see symptoms from the time of infection. First visible

Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Page 3 symptoms of Cercospora are extremely small whitish spots on leaves. These spots rapidly increase in size, becoming brownish or bright purple in color, possibly in 2-3 days. Spots are scattered over the leaf surface, occurring less frequently on the stems. First individual spots are nearly circular in outline, but become united with other spots in increasing numbers. Mature spots are 1/8 inch in diameter with border colors ranging from brown to purple. Spot centers appear ashen gray due to the many spores with small black specs scattered throughout (See Picture on page 6). When spots become numerous, leaves gradually turn yellow and finally turn brown and die. Dead leaves shrivel, but remain firmly attached to the crown making defoliation more difficult at harvest. CONTROL Control measures for Cercospora leafspot include cultural, resistant varieties and chemical. One of the most effective cultural means to decrease leafspot infection is crop rotation. Cercospora leafspot does not attack field crops unrelated to sugar beets. A three or more year rotation coupled with clean plowdown of crop residues effectively reduces inoculum from most fields. When planting this year s crop, do not overlap into last year s beet field. Do not move inoculum from last year s sugar beet field into this year s field with secondary tillage implements. All varieties approved for the 2006 planting season in the Great Lakes growing region have some tolerance to leafspot, thanks to the sugar beet breeders. Variety (regular and specialty) tolerence ratings for Cercospora Leafspot resistance are as follows: C-355 is EXCELLENT. B-5310, HM-7172RZ, HM- 2771RZ, HM-2767 and C-442 are VERY GOOD. C-271, C-963 and HM-2761 are GOOD. B-4381R, B-5833, HM-74RZ, HM-2763RZ and B-5451 are FAIR. B-5411R, HM-73RZ and B-5800R are POOR. ECONOMIC THRESHOLD Do not delay the first fungicide application beyond when you first see leafspot in July or August, especially if the forecast states temperatures will stay in the optimum range coupled with high humidity. Control measures are normally justified until early-mid September, depending on environmental conditions and anticipated harvest date. Both systemic and contact chemical options are available to control Cercospora leafspot in sugar beets. Systemic compounds give longer control with 14 to 21 days before the next application. Contact (protectants) compounds must be applied more often, but are less costly. Coverage is critical with fungicide applications; fungicides need to penetrate to the new growth in the plant s crown. Higher gallonage (20-40 GPA) coupled with 100 to 120 PSI pump Continued on Page 4.. Late Cercospora Infection Causing Reduced Quality. (Unsprayed) Recent research indicates at 77 82 o it took ten days to see symptoms from the time of infection. Excellent Leafspot Control / Healthy Foliage. (Sprayed Two Times)

Page 4 Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Unhealthy Foliage (Browning) can Reduce Yield and Quality Timing of first spray should never be delayed beyond first spot in the field. Cercospora Resistant Variety Compared to a susceptible ECONOMIC THRESHOLD Continued from Page 3 pressures (80 to 100 PSI at the nozzle) are best for fungicide applications, especially protectants. An aerial (airplane) application will provide some good protection (> 5 GPA). Always apply fungicides to dry leaf surfaces, reducing the likelihood of run-off. Do not spray FLAT (dry-wilted) beets. In addition, make sure spray water ph is less than 7.0. Water sensitive paper should be used to check penetration into the sugar beet canopy. Fungicide costs, recommendations, schedules, etc. are listed on the next page. Fungicides are quite effective, if applied correctly. Economical threshold for chemical control is dependent on four conditions: timing of infection, level of infection, weather forecast and variety. Control recommendations can also be made from a weather model called BEETCAST in Michigan. Begin scouting early-planted fields with less tolerant varieties at canopy closure OR July 1st. Full canopy will occur in narrow rows before wide rows. Check places with little or no air movement first (i.e. next to cornfields, woodlots or creek bottoms). If the first Cercospora spot is visible anywhere in the field, it is economically justified to begin the first fungicide application. TIMING OF FIRST SPRAY SHOULD NEVER BE DELAYED BEYOND FIRST SPOT IN THE FIELD. BEETCAST 2006 Beetcast is a Cercospora leafspot disease forecasting model available through Michigan Sugar Company. BeetCast uses temperature and leaf wetness to create a disease severity value (DSV) that models Cercospora beticola growth and development. Disease management recommendations have been modified to reflect the risk of Cercospora leafspot disease severity for the Michigan Sugar Company growing region. This risk is represented by a color coded map (see map on following page). Areas which consistently have high levels of disease are considered high risk and are colored red and orange. Areas with moderate levels of disease are considered moderate risk and are colored yellow. Areas with lower levels of disease are considered low risk and are colored green. Growers in the red and orange areas of the map should apply fungicides at 55 DSV intervals for maximum economic return. In the red area, applying fungicides first at 55 DSV s then at 35 DSV intervals have also produced high levels of economic return from leafspot management in some years. Growers in the yellow region of the map should apply fungicides at 70 DSV intervals or shorter. Applying fungicides at 55 DSV intervals have also resulted in high economic return in these areas. Growers in the green region are advised to follow one of the two scenarios. Make the first fungicide application when first spots appear in the area or 80 DSV s, which ever is first. The

Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Page 5 Typical Cercospora Lesion subsequent applications should be made every 55 DSV s. Inoculum levels appear to be lower in the green zone, resulting in the delay of leafspot development compared to the other regions. Once the disease is in the area, it develops at a rate similar to the other regions. Growers should contact their Michigan Sugar Company Agriculturalist to develop a leafspot management program that works best for their farm. RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT Michigan Growers are fortunate to have several very effective fungicides for control of Cercospora Leafspot. In order to maintain the effectiveness of the products, it is recommended to always rotate fungicides and fungicide classes. The best strategy would be to use each fungicide class only once in your leafspot spray program. Currently, some level of fungicide resistance has been identified with Topsin (Benzimidazole). To reduce the chance of Cercospora developing further fungicide resistance, apply Topsin only ONE time each year; Topsin must be tankmixed with unrelated type compounds such as EBDC, Tin or Copper; NEVER apply the same fungicide(s) or fungicide classes consecutively. If Amistar/Quadris was applied for Rhizoctonia control after the four leaf stage, rotate to non-strobilurin fungicide for the first leaf spot application. BEETCAST Growers, in Michigan, can access BeetCast on the website www.michiganbeets.com and, in Ontario, on the website: http://www.ownweb.ca/lib/beetcast.cfm. The best strategy would be to use each fungicide class only once in your Leafspot spray program. Complete Defoliation from Cercospora

Page 6 Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Michigan Sugar Company Fungicide Ratings and Information Sheet 2006 Fungicide Chemical Class Resistance Type of Cercospora Rhiz Potential Activity Control Control Headline Strobilurin Very High Translaminar Excellent Fair Eminent Triazole High Systemic Excellent NA Gem Strobilurin Very High Translaminar Excellent (-) Fair/Good Topsin+EBDC Benzimidazole Very High Systemic + Contact Good 1 NA Tin Products Triphenyltin Hydroxide Moderate Contact Good (-) NA Amistar Quadris Strobilurin Very High Slightly Systemic Good (-) Excellent EBDC Ethylenebisdithiocarbamate Low Contact Fair Short Residual Copper Copper Hydroxide Low Contact Fair Short Residual NA NA 1 Documented Laboratory Resistance to Topsin Net Return from Cercospora Leafspot Management Average of 8 trials Black fruiting bodies 880 840 $ per Acre 800 760 720 Purple Borders 680 640 55/55 70/70 Scouting Reduced Spray UTC Michigan Sugarbeet Company 2006

Special Edition Cercospora Leafspot Newsletter 2006 Page 7 Cercospora Leafspot Fungicide Costs*** Fungicide Rate Cost ($/A)* Appl Int Cost $/A/day REI PHI (days) (hours) (days) Eminent 13.0 oz/a $ 17.94 14-21 1.28 (.85) 24 14 Headline 9.2 oz/a $ 17.31 14 1.24 12 7 Gem 7.0 oz/a $ 22.86 10-14 2.29 (1.63) 12 21 Gem (w/rebate) 7.0 oz/a $ 15.86 10-14 1.59 (1.13) 12 21 Amistar 3.0 oz/a $ 17.57 10-14 1.76 (1.26) 4 0 Quadris 9.6 oz/a $ 19.87 10-14 1.99 (1.42) 4 0 Supertin 5.0 oz/a $ 11.60 10-14 1.16 (.83) 48 21 Agritin 5.0 oz/a $ 11.60 10-14 1.16 (.83) 48 21 Topsin M + TPTH.5 lbs./a + 4.0 oz/a $ 18.44 14-21** 1.32 (.88) 48 21 BEETCAST Cont. Topsin + EBDC.5 lbs./a + 2.0 lbs./a $ 15.49 14-21 1.11 (.74) 12 21 Penncozeb 75 2 lbs./a $ 5.99 7-10.86 (.60) 24 14 DF (EBDC) Manzate FL 1.6 qts./a $ 5.79 7-10.83 (.58) 24 14 (EBDC) Dithane DF 2 lbs./a $ 5.67 7-10.81 (.57) 24 14 (EBDC) Manex 1.6 qts./a $ 7.45 7-10 1.06 (.75) 24 14 * Cost includes approximate fungicide product only, NOT application costs; and does not reflect any discounts. ** Cost ($/A/day) is calculated by cost per acre divided by the shortest (longest) label reapplication interval for each fungicide. ** Application interval is shortened, if tolerance is suspected. *** Average retail price taken from multiple chemical suppliers. Loss For Non-Control of Leafspot* RWSA TON / ACRE % Suc % CJP Treated 7267 29.0 17.6 93.0 Untreated 6169 26.2 16.8 92.5 * 1999-2001 Eight Sugarbeet Advancement Leafspot Trials Significantly Different Average # of Fungicide Applications was 2.9

Cercospora Leafspot Fungicide Summary 1.) The single most important Cercospora Leafspot fungicide spray is the first one. Research indicates best timing of fungicide for both control and net revenue occurs just prior to the first spot being found. 2.) The first application of fungicide should be applied according to the Beetcast DSV Risk Management map or never any later than first spot found in your area. Begin scouting no later than July 1st. 3.) Follow Beetcast DSV Spray recommendation intervals or label reapplication intervals if not utilizing Beetcast. 4.) Always rotate fungicide classes. Ideally do not use any chemistry more than once in a Leafspot spray program. 5.) Fungicides with contact mode of action (i.e. TPTH, EBDC and Copper) are most effective with thorough coverage and applied prior to the onset of disease symptoms. Apply before NOT after infection has occurred. 6.) Never apply Topsin more than once and always tank mix with control fungicide such as EBDC and TPTH. 7.) To prevent resistance to Strobilurin fungicide, it is advised not to use another Strobilurin for the first Leafspot spray if Quadris/Amistar was used after the four leaf stage for Rhizoctonia. 8.) Fields to be harvest after October 15th continue Cercospora Spray application until approximately September 15-21st for susceptible varieties. 9.) Never apply fungicides closer than labeled pre harvest interval. 10.) Always scout fields in conjunction with Beetcast Spray Model. Michigan State University Extension Saginaw County One Tuscola Street, Suite 100 Saginaw, MI 48607-1287 Sincerely, Steve Poindexter Extension Sugar Beet Educator (989) 758-2500 MSUE Saginaw County PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID ITHACA, MI PERMIT NO. 35 Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status.