Uncertainty of measurement for Trace analysis

Similar documents
Sunflower seeds V2.0-07/12/2007

Some common problems in vineyards

Interested in conducting your own webinar?

DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE EVALUATION OF DISTRIBUTION OF PESTICIDE RESIDUES AFTER PRIMARY PROCESS IN CITRUS FRUIT, POME FRUIT, OILSEEDS AND WINE GRAPES

Pesticide Residue Analysis Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab

Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT OF WINE PRODUCED IN PORTUGAL

UNDERSTANDING FAULTS IN WINE BY JAMIE GOODE

This document displays summary values for each pesticide or other organic residue found in FDA s Total Diet Study, Market Baskets (36

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

An overview of beer flavour and sensory training

Varietal Specific Barrel Profiles

Custom Barrel Profiling

Determination of Pesticides in Coffee with QuEChERS Extraction and Silica Gel SPE Cleanup

MPLs of active substances of pesticides in food products in accordance with GN mg/kg

The Determination of Pesticides in Wine

yeast-derived flavours

BARRELS, BARREL ADJUNCTS, AND ALTERNATIVES

Christian Butzke & Jill Blume enology.butzke.com

purposes. The Minimum Quality Standard will cover ISO 3720 for Black Tea and this standard is mandatory at the point of export of any teas.

ANALYTICAL SERVICES Valid from the 01/02/2016 to the 31/01/17

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code Amendment No. 175

The score of recognition

Please contact Jim Cranney by telephone at (530) or via at if you have questions or need additional information.

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Smoke Taint Update. Thomas Collins, PhD Washington State University

BACKGROUND Background information including a brief explanation of the major changes is given under Agenda Item 8(a) (see CX/PR 11/43/7).

Increasing Toast Character in French Oak Profiles

Introduction to Barrel Profiling

Dr. Christian E. BUTZKE Associate Professor of Enology Department of Food Science. (765) FS Room 1261

The Radial Rays (correctly multiseriate parenchyma rays) their large size is almost unique to oak

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Fermentation-derived aroma compounds and grape-derived monoterpenes

Het NIZO micro dinner:

Development of residue management strategies and action plans for export vegetables.

Little Things That Make A Big Difference: Yeast Selection. Yeast selection tasting

(Unofficial Translation) Notification o f Ministry of Public Health Title: Food Containing Pesticide Residues

Implementation of Modified QuEChERS Techniques for Modern Applications. Derick Lucas, Ph.D. Agilent Technologies

The avoidance of taints and contaminations during

SULPHIDES IN WINE. Treatment and Prevention - a practical approach

An introduction to beer flavour

DR. BRUCE ZOECKLEIN, PROFESSOR EMERITUS, VIRGINIA TECH

Good Brett and other urban Brettanomyces myths

Towards the prediction of wine outcomes from grape compositional measures. Bob Dambergs, Paul Smith WS42 18 July 2012

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

RECOMMENDED USAGE RESTRICTIONS FOR PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS ON SOUTHERN AFRICAN EXPORT CITRUS

MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS FOR PROCESSED OR READY-TO-EAT FOODS OR FEEDS

RECOMMENDED USAGE RESTRICTIONS FOR PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS ON SOUTHERN AFRICAN EXPORT CITRUS

Chemical and Sensory Differences in American Oak Toasting Profiles

(Unofficial Translation)

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME. CODEX COMMITTEE ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES Forty-first Session Beijing, China, April 2009

We will start momentarily at 2pm ET. Download slides & presentation ONE WEEK after the webinar:

Call for AOAC INTERNATIONAL Collaborator

Smoke Taint: Effect of wildfires on fruit and wine composition

Food Chemistry 117 (2009) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Food Chemistry. journal homepage:

Residue Decline Curves for Blueberries and Raspberries or How To Meet MRLs in Export Markets

TOASTING TECHNIQUES: Old World and New World RESEARCH. Joel Aiken and Bob Masyczek, Beaulieu Vineyard Maurizio Angeletti, Antinori Winery

WINE SENSORY DEFECTS

ADVANCED ANALYTICAL SENSORY CORRELATION TOWARDS A BETTER MOLECULAR UNDERSTANDING OF COFFEE FLAVOUR

Research on the Effects of Different Charring, Toasting and Seasoning of Oak Barrels and Whiskey Maturation A 5 Year Study

High resolution mass approaches for wine and oenological products analysis

Managing Wine Faults and Taints

VINOLOK (VINOSEAL) closure evaluation Stage 1: Fundamental performance assessment

Impact of leaf removal on Istrian Malvasia wine quality

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: L40103

Effect on the Aroma Profile of Graciano and Tempranillo Red Wines of the Application of Two Antifungal Treatments onto Vines

The Odor and Aroma of Wine

Mousiness, Brettanomyces, Cork Taints

Fruit Crops Grapes. Diseases of Grapes and Fungicides Labeled for Control. Disease Fungicides a Efficacy b

The impact of smoke exposure on different grape varieties. Renata Ristic and Kerry Wilkinson

Determination of Pesticide Residues in Red Wine

Evaluation of winemaking treatments in Australian Cabernet Sauvignon. Vintage trial 2018

THE BREWING VALUE OF HOPS HOP & BREW SCHOOL A UG 29 S EPT 1, 2017, Y AKIMA

Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards. Food Testing

MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS FOR PERMISSIBLE CHEMICALS

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: L50109

Presenter: Jasha Karasek

Technical note. How much do potential precursor compounds contribute to reductive aromas in wines post-bottling?

The Importance of Dose Rate and Contact Time in the Use of Oak Alternatives

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Natural Aroma Chemicals

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: E10106

Florida Citrus Production Guide: Fresh Fruit Pesticide Residue Limits 1

Natural Aroma Chemicals

Natural Aroma Chemicals

Commercial Crop Production Small Fruit - Grapes

COOPER COMPARISONS Next Phase of Study: Results with Wine

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: LM0100

Wine Faults. When Good Wines Go Bad! Luke Holcombe cell. Classification of Wine Faults:

The Natural Choice for Flavor and Fragrance Ingredients. The Natural Choice for Flavor and Fragrance Ingredients. natural PRODUCT LIST

MASS SPECTROMETRY IN GRAPE AND WINE CHEMISTRY. PART II: THE CONSUMER PROTECTION

Centre for Expertise in Smoke Taint Research. Dr Mark Downey, Director

Application of stir bar sorptive extraction for wine analysis

CHAPTER 8. Sample Laboratory Experiments

Study Progress LateSeason Western Region IR- 4

Understanding the impact hopping rate has on the aroma quality and intensity of beer dry hopped with Cascade

Transcription:

Uncertainty of measurement for Trace analysis Analysis uncertainties are ordered by method number. Generic definitions Limit of quantification (): the lowest level at which a result can be confidently cited in matrix. A result of < indicates that the sample has no detectable residue of the analyte at a concentration equal to or greater than the for the method. Limit of detection (LoD): the lowest value that can be positively identified as present by the instrumentation. A result of < LoD indicates that the sample has no detectable residue of the analyte at a concentration equal to or greater than the LoD for the method. Uncertainty of Measurement (UoM): the uncertainty in the reported result. Notes:. In some instances, levels between the LoD and the are reported as trace to indicate that the compound has been positively identified but the quantitation cannot be confidently cited. LM33/GM9- Determination of agrochemical residues in fruits and vegetables by LC/MS/MS. Grapes All compounds have a of 0.0 mg/l except Emamectin (0.005 mg/l), Indoxacarb (0.02 mg/l), Azinphos methyl, Fenitrothion, Fludioxonil, Iprodione, Parathion methyl, Procymidone, Triadimenol, Fenvalerate, Methamidiphos, THPI (0.05 mg/l) and Captan (0. mg/l). Residues above the are reported to the nearest 0.0 mg/l. The following compounds have a UoM of +0.0 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.05 mg/kg. UoM of + 0.02 mg/kg from 0.05 0.2 mg/kg and + 0% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/kg: Ametoctradin Fenarimol Oxadixyl Atrazine Fenhexamid Parathion-methyl Azinphos methyl Fenitrothion Penconazole Azoxystrobin Fenthion Procymidone Benalaxyl Fenvalerate Propiconazole Boscalid Flusilazole Proquinazid Buprofezin Hexaconazole Pyrimethanil Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page of

Carbaryl Indoxacarb Quinoxyfen Carbendazim Iprodione Simazine Chlorantraniliprole Malathion Spinetoram Chlorpyrifos-methyl Mandipropamid Spinosad Clothianidin Metalaxyl Spiroxamine Cyflufenamid Methamidiphos Tebuconazole Diazinon Methidathion Tetraconazole Dimethoate Methiocarb Tebufenozide Dimethomorph Methomyl THPI Emamectin Methoxyfenozide Triadimefon Etoxazole Metrafenone Triadimenol Fenamiphos Myclobutanil Trifloxystrobin The following compounds will have a UoM of +0.02 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.05 mg/kg. UoM of + 0.03 mg/kg from 0.05 0.2 mg/kg and + 5% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/kg: Chlorpyrifos Cyprodinil Ethion Fludioxonil Pyraclostrobin Quinoxyfen Captan has a UoM of +0.04 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.2 mg/kg and + at levels greater than 0. mg/kg: Note: THPI (tetrahydrophthalamide) is a breakdown metabolite of Captan but is currently not part of any residue definition or regulatory guideline for any export market. Results are provided for informative purposes only. Marc, pomace and fruit and vegetables All compounds have a of 0.05 mg/l except Captan, Fludioxonil, fenvalerate and THPI (0. mg/l). Residues above the are reported to the nearest 0.0 mg/l. The following compounds have a UoM of +0.0 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.05 mg/kg. UoM of + 0.02 mg/kg from 0.05 0.2 mg/kg and + 0% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/kg: Ametoctradin Fenarimol Oxadixyl Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 2 of

Atrazine Fenhexamid Parathion-methyl Azinphos methyl Fenitrothion Penconazole Azoxystrobin Fenthion Procymidone Benalaxyl Fenvalerate Propiconazole Boscalid Flusilazole Proquinazid Buprofezin Hexaconazole Pyrimethanil Carbaryl Indoxacarb Quinoxyfen Carbendazim Iprodione Simazine Chlorantraniliprole Malathion Spinetoram Chlorpyrifos-methyl Mandipropamid Spinosad Clothianidin Metalaxyl Spiroxamine Cyflufenamid Methamidiphos Tebuconazole Diazinon Methidathion Tetraconazole Dimethoate Methiocarb Tebufenozide Dimethomorph Methomyl THPI Emamectin Methoxyfenozide Triadimefon Etoxazole Metrafenone Triadimenol Fenamiphos Myclobutanil Trifloxystrobin The following compounds will have a UoM of +0.02 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.05 mg/kg. UoM of + 0.03 mg/kg from 0.05 0.2 mg/kg and + 5% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/kg: Chlorpyrifos Cyprodinil Ethion Fludioxonil Pyraclostrobin Quinoxyfen Captan has a UoM of +0.04 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.2 mg/kg and + at levels greater than 0. mg/kg: Note: THPI (tetrahydrophthalamide) is a breakdown metabolite of Captan but is currently not part of any residue definition or regulatory guideline for any export market. Results are provided for informative purposes only. Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 3 of

LM34/GM2-Determination of agrochemical residues in wine, juice and liquid samples by LC/MS/MS. All compounds have a of 0.0 mg/l except Captan, Fludioxonil (0.02 mg/l) and THPI (0.2 mg/l). Residues above the are reported to the nearest 0.0 mg/l. The following compounds have an UoM of ±0.0 mg/l at levels at or below 0.05 mg/l. UoM of ±0.02 mg/l from 0.05 0.2 mg/l and 0% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/l. Atrazine Etoxazole Oxadixyl Azinphos methyl Fenarimol Penconazole Azoxystrobin Fenhexamid Procymidone Benalaxyl Fenitrothion Propiconazole Boscalid Fenthion Proquinazid Buprofezin Flusilazole Quinoxyfen Carbaryl Hexaconazole Simazine Carbendazim Iprodione Spiroxamine Chlorantraniliprole Malathion Tebuconazole Chlorpyrifos-methyl Mandipropamid Tetraconazole Clothianidin Metalaxyl Tebufenozide Cyflufenamid Methamidiphos THPI Cyprodinil Methidathion Triadimefon Diazinon Methoxyfenozide Triadimenol Dimethoate Metrafenone Trifloxystrobin Dimethomorph Myclobutanil The following compounds will have a UoM of +0.02 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.05 mg/kg. UoM of + 0.03 mg/kg from 0.05 0.2 mg/kg and + 5% at levels greater than 0.2 mg/kg: Chlorpyrifos Ethion Fludioxonil Parathion methyl Prothiofos Pyraclostrobin Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 4 of

Indoxacarb Pyrimethanil Captan has a UoM of +0.04 mg/kg at levels at or below 0.2 mg/kg and + at levels greater than 0. mg/kg: Note: THPI (tetrahydrophthalamide) is a breakdown metabolite of captan but is currently not part of any residue definition or regulatory guideline for any export market. Results are provided for informative purposes only. GM46- Oak flavour analysis in wines and wood products Wine UoM (<0 µg/l) UoM (µg/l) (± µg/l) guaiacol 0% 4-methylguaiacol 0% cis-oak lactone 0 0% trans-oak lactone 0 0% eugenol 0 0% vanillin 0 5% 4-ethylphenol 0 0% 4-ethylguaiacol 0 0% furfural 0 0% 5-methylfurfural 0 0% Iso-eugenol 0 0% 5-hydroxy-methylfurfural 000 0% Syringaldehyde 500 0% Coniferaldehyde 500 0% Sinapaldehyde 500 0% Wood products The following limits have been adopted based on a 0 g/l extraction in a model wine simulant. (µg/g) UoM (±µg/g) guaiacol 0. 0% 4-methylguaiacol 0. 0% cis-oak lactone 0% trans-oak lactone 0% eugenol 0% vanillin 0% 4-ethylphenol 0% 4-ethylguaiacol 0% furfural 0% 5-methylfurfural 0% Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 5 of

GM63- Determination of Ochratoxin A in wine by HPLC-FLD The result is expressed as Ochratoxin A (µg/l for wine). (µg/l) UoM Ochratoxin A 0.03 0.0 Levels above the reporting limit 0.03 µg/l are reported to the nearest 0.0 µg/l. GM89- Chloroanisoles in wine and cork by SPME Wine LoD (ng/l) (ng/l) UoM (<0 ng/l) UoM (>0 ng/l) 2,6-DCA 0 5 5 2,4-DCA 0 5 5 2,4,6-TCA 2 0% 2,3,4,6-TeCA 2 2 2,4,6-TBA 2 0% PCA 2 2 Oak wood LoD (ng/l)* (ng/l)* UoM (<0 ng/l)* UoM (>0 ng/l)* 2,6-DCA 5 7 2 2,4-DCA 5 7 2 2,4,6-TCA 2 0% 2,3,4,6-TeCA 2 2 2,4,6-TBA 2 0% PCA 2 2 *For cork and oak samples this figure relates to the model wine extract generated from the sample. Oak samples are extracted at approx. 20 g/l in model wine and corks are extracted whole in 00 ml of model wine. Cork LoD (ng/cork)* (ng/cork)* UoM (< ng/cork)* UoM (>0 ng/cork)* 2,6-DCA 0.5 0.7 0.2 2,4-DCA 0.5 0.7 0.2 2,4,6-TCA 0. 0.2 0. 0% 2,3,4,6-TeCA 0. 0.2 0.2 2,4,6-TBA 0. 0.2 0. 0% PCA 0. 0.2 0.2 Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 6 of

Corks are extracted whole in 00 ml of model wine and the extract analysed as per wine. GM90- Determination of ethyl carbamate and potential ethyl carbamate in wine Results are reported in µg/l to the nearest unit. (µg/l) UoM (<30 µg/l) UoM ethyl carbamate 8 3 0% GM9-4EP and 4EG in wine and oak by SPME (µg/l) UoM (< 00 µg/l) UoM (> 00 µg/l) 4-ethylphenol 0 0 0% 4-ethylguaiacol 0 0 0% GM93- Determination of Resveratrol and Piceid in wines and juice Levels above the (0.4 mg/l) are reported to the nearest 0. mg/l. Between levels of 0.4 mg/l and 2.0 mg/l UoM is ±0.4 mg/l, for levels above 2.0 mg/l the UoM is ±. GM95- Determination of a group of methoxypyrazines in wine, juice and grapes. (ng/l) UoM(<20 ng/l) (±ng/l) UoM (>20 ng/l) IPMP 5 4 SBMP 5 4 IBMP 5 4 Levels above the quantitation limit 5 ng/l are reported to the nearest ng/l. GM97- Determination of 2,4-D in leaves, grapes and wine The result is expressed as total 2,4-D in mg/l for wine and is a sum of the free acid and esters, expressed as the free acid. Residues above 0.0 mg/l are reported to the nearest 0.0 mg/l. A result of < 0.0 indicates that the sample has no detectable residue of 2,4-D at a concentration equal to or greater than the limit of quantitation for the method. (mg/l or mg/kg) UoM <0. UoM >0. (±mg/l or mg/kg) (±mg/l or mg/kg) 2,4-D 0.0 0.0 0% Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 7 of

MCPA 0.0 0.0 0% GM02 - Determination of a group of halogenated phenols in wine LoD (ng/l) (ng/l) UoM (<00 ng/l) (±ng/l) UoM (>00 ng/l) 2-chlorophenol 0 20 0 2-bromophenol 6-chloro-o-cresol 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dichlorophenol 3 & 4-bromophenol 2,4-dibromophenol 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 20 2 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,6-dibromophenol 0 20 0 Note for Tartaric acid samples: Tartaric acids were added at to ph adjusted juice at approximately 0 g/l prior to fermentation. The resulting wine was then analysed as per GM02 and results expressed in ng/l. GM8- Determination of natamycin in wine The result is expressed in μg/l of natamycin. (µg/l) UoM (<20 µg/l) UoM (>20 µg/l) Natamycin 5 5 Residues above 5 μg/l are reported to the nearest μg/l GM22- Determination of smoke related compounds in wine, juice and grapes Wine and juice (µg/l) UoM (<0 µg/l) UoM (>0 µg/l) guaiacol 0% 4-methylguaiacol o-cresol p-cresol m-cresol syringol methyl syringol 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Grapes and leaves (µg/kg) UoM (<0 µg/kg) (±µg/kg) UoM (>0 µg/kg) (±µg/kg) Guaiacol 0% 4-methylguaiacol o-cresol p-cresol 0% 0% 0% Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 8 of

m-cresol Syringol Methyl Syringol 2 2 0% 0% 0% GM23- Determination of low molecular weight sulphur compounds in wine Results above the limit of quantitation are reported to the nearest µg/l for all analytes. (µg/l) UoM (<50 µg/l) UoM (>50 µg/l) Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) 0.5 5 0% Methanethiol (methyl mercaptan) 5 0% Ethanethiol (ethyl mercaptan) 5 0% Dimethylsulfide (DMS) 2 5 0% Carbon disulfide (CS2) 0.5 5 0% Diethylsulfide 0.5 5 0% Methylthioacetate 5 5 0% Dimethyldisulfide (DMDS) 0.5 5 0% Ethylthioacetate 5 5 0% Diethyldisulfide 0.5 5 0% A result of < indicates the compound has not been determined at a level at or above the nominated above GM25-Determination of indole in wine and juice (µg/l) UoM Indole 5 0% The result is expressed in μg/l of indole. Residues above 5 μg/l are reported to the nearest μg/l. GM26- Extraction of rhodamine in wine A result of < 0. indicates that the brine marker (rhodamine) was not detected at a concentration at or above the for the method. (µg/l) UoM (< µg/l) UoM (> µg/l) Rhodamine 0. 0.3 30% Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 9 of

GM27- Determination of wine aroma compounds in wine and juice (µg/l) UoM (<40 µg/l) (± µg/l) UoM (>40 µg/l) Rose oxide 0 8 Linalool 0 8 Nerol 0 8 Geraniol 0 8 α-terpineol 0 8 Trimethyl dihydronaphthalene (TDN) 0 8 β-damascenone 0 8 β-ionone 0 8 (µg/l) UoM (<20 µg/l) UoM (>20 µg/l) Napthalene 5 4 (µg/l) UoM (<200 µg/l) UoM (>200 µg/l) Ethyl hexanoate 50 40 Ethyl octanoate 50 40 Ethyl decanoate 50 40 Results above the are reported to the nearest µg/l. GM38- Determination of chlorophenols in wine, juice and ethanol extracts using HS- SPME and GCMS (µg/l) UoM (< 5 µg/l) UoM (> 5 µg/l) 2-chlorophenol 3 4-chlorophenol 3 2,4-chlorophenol 3 2,6-chlorophenol 3 2,4,6-trichlorophenol 2 Tetrachlorophenol 3 Pentachlorophenol 3 30% Results above the limit of detection are reported to the nearest µg/l. GM4- Determination of smoke related glycoside precursors in grapes, wine and juice The for all analytes is.0 µg/l. The UoM for results <20 µg/l is ± 4.0 µg/l and for results >20 µg/l is ± 5%. GM53- Determination of,8-cineole in wine (µg/l) UoM (<20 µg/l) UoM (>20 µg/l) Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page 0 of

,8-cineole 2.0 2 0% Dithiocarbamates The limit of reporting for this method is 0. mg/l in wine. A result of '< ' indicates that the analyte has not been detected at a concentration equal to or greater than the. Total dithiocarbamates includes the summed total of mancozeb, metiram and ziram (and all other pesticides of this chemical class) determined by CS2 analysis from an acid hydrolysis of the sample. Phosphorus Acid in wines and juice Phosphorous acid analysis has been sub-contracted to a third party laboratory for completion. The limit of quantitation () for this analysis is 0. mg/kg. A result of '< ' indicates that the analyte has not been detected at a concentration equal to or greater than the limit of quantitation for the analyte or method. Phosphorus acid in solids This analysis has been sub-contracted to a third party laboratory for completion. The limit of quantitation for this method is 0.03 g/kg in DAP. A result of '< ' indicates that the analyte has not been detected at a concentration equal to or greater than the. Version:.3 Current Doc ID: 28838 Date last modified: 4/2/206 Page of