Strawberry Production and Integrated Pest Management in California

Similar documents
Role of lygus bug in fruit deformity. IPM tools for managing lygus bug


Strawberry Pests and Diseases: IPM Studies and the Pallidosis-related Decline

Western tarnished plant bug (Lygus hesperus),

Biological and Microbial Control Options for Managing Lygus Bug in Strawberries

Update on microbial control of arthropod pests of strawberries

Presented by: Manuel Campos. 2 nd Ag Innovations Conference: Microbial Control

Managing thrips on lettuce, aphids on broccoli, and the new invasive pest Bagrada bug on cole crops

Discipline 2EC AMVAC Active Ingredients: Bifenthrin HRAC/FRAC/IRAC Classification: Group 3A Insecticide EPA#:

Spider Mite Management in Walnuts. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UCCE Kern County Tri-County Walnut Day, 2008

Update on Small Fruit Insecticides for grapes, blueberries, and brambles. Rick Weinzierl University of Illinois

Management of Late-Season Infestations of Cotton Aphids and Sweetpotato Whiteflies (Strain B) in Pima Cotton in the San Joaquin Valley

Vegetable Insecticide Update. Final cancellation order for sulfoxaflor¹. Calypso 4 F (thiacloprid) Final cancellation order for sulfoxaflor

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Control of Vine Mealybug, Planococcus ficus, in Wine Grapes using New Reduced-risk Insecticides in a Pest Management Program

BASECO A MICROBIAL BIOCONTROL FOR GRAPEVINE MEALYBUGS. KETAN K. MEHTA Ecosense Labs. (I) Pvt. Ltd. ABIM, LUCERNE, OCTOBER 22 24, 2012.

Citrus Crop Guide. New registration for citrus gall wasp

Tom Kuhar Associate Professor Dept. of Entomology Virginia Tech

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2012 Research Report. Understanding foliar pest interactions for sustainable vine management

Greg Krawczyk, Larry A. Hull, Travis R. Enyeart and Margaret E. Reid

Mealybug Species. Vine Mealybug. Grape and Obscure Mealybugs. Longtailed Mealybug. Pink Hibiscus Mealybug. Gills Mealybug

Flupyradifurone. Jamin Huang, Ph.D. Bayer CropScience. Global Minor Use Workshop Chicago, September 21, 2015

Arthropod Management in California Blueberries. David Haviland and Stephanie Rill UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co. Blueberry Field Day 20 May 2009

SWD Host List Risk? NE SWD Working Group

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Whitefly Management Part 2

Walnut Husk Fly: Biology, Monitoring and Management. R. A. Van Steenwyk Dept. of E.S.P.M University of California, Berkeley

BIOLOGY, MONITORING, CONTROL & UPDATE ON THE SPOTTED-WING DROSOPHILA (SWD) Blair Sampson USDA-ARS Poplarville, MS

to feeding damage resulting in the characteristic russeting that can reduce fruit yield and

POWERFUL INSECT CONTROL IN CITRUS

Report of Progress 961

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

sites for disease entry, in particular citrus canker. ACP is an even more recent arrival in Florida

Chemical Control Options for SWD in Blueberries, Caneberries, Strawberries, Grapes, and Stone fruits

European Grapevine Moth, Lobesia botrana: The Year in Review

2007 RETAIN RESEARCH RESULTS AND MANAGEMENT OF SCALES INFESTING WALNUTS

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Management of Macrophomina and Fusarium with fumigants and non-fumigant treatments

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

Managing Lygus Bugs in Strawberries

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 26 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) Preliminary Results

Managing potato leafhopper in wine grapes

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Integrated Crop Management for Vineyards

Asian Citrus Psyllid and Huanglongbing (HLB)

Improving the safety and quality of nuts

Spotted Wing Drosophila and Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Updates

Tree Fruit Insecticide Update. Celeste Welty Extension Entomologist January 2017

Special Spotted Wing Drosophila Edition

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature? Brian Crespi Andre Goncalves Janani Kannan Alexey Kudryavtsev Jessica Stern

California Raisin Marketing Board Crop Production Research

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Prepared by Louise Ferguson, Mark Bell, Mark Henderson

Results of 2001 Avocado Thrips Field Pesticide Efficacy Trials

Current research status and strategic challenges on the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus in Uganda

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

A Review of Corn Earworm and Other Insect Problems in 2011

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

Botanigard WP best practice application guide

Insect Pests of Cucurbits in New Hampshire

Area-Wide Program to Eradicate the European Grapevine Moth, Lobesia botrana in California, USA.

Report of Progress 945

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Relative efficacy of some insecticides for the control of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora (Waterhouse) in Bangladesh

Understanding Seasonal Nutritional Requirements

Small Fruit Insect Management. Kelly Hamby Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist University of Maryland

Vine Mealybug Biology & Control Strategies

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Project Sheet

Joseph A. Fiola, Ph.D. Specialist in Viticulture and Small Fruit Western MD Research & Education Center Keedysville Road Keedysville, MD

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

IPM Implementation benefits from the partnership between scientists and growers: a case study in a Tuscan wine-growing area

APPENDIX Thirty Trees Sampling Method for CBB Monitoring

Sustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry

Evaluation of Compost Teas for Disease Management of Wild Blueberries in Nova Scotia

Recalibration for Sunflower

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

What s New in Vegetable Insect Management

Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium Final Report Title: Final Report Grant Code: Research Project Personnel: Objectives: Justification:

WSU Crop and Soil Sciences

CONTROL OF RED PALM WEEVIL, RHYNCHOPHORUS FERRUGINEUS OLIVER USING PROPHYLACTIC SPRAYING OF DATE PALMS AND TRUNK INJECTION

Soybean Production State Extension Conference

2017 PECAN WEEVIL UPDATE

Insect Control Research for Pecan

Managing Navel Orangeworm (NOW) in Walnuts. Kathy Kelley Anderson Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

Grape. Disease Control

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Project Sheet

BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDES AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX OF PIGEONPEA [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] *PATEL, S. A. AND PATEL, R. K.

Outlook for the World Coffee Market

Giant whitefly. Perennial Crops. Biological Control Update on. Citrus Leafminer Olive fruit fly. Giant Whitefly. Release

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Pesticide Applicator Training Program: Vegetable & Fruit Insect Management News

1 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations E-77-W E-77-W. Field Crops SOYBEAN INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

San Jose Scale, Iron Deficiency

New Research on Navel Orangeworm Management

Program Review Extension Activities October 1, 2008 September 30,

Transcription:

Strawberry Production and Integrated Pest Management in California Surendra Dara PhD, DAIT Strawberry and Vegetable Crops Advisor University of California Cooperative Extension Affiliated IPM Advisor University of California Statewide IPM Program San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties Affiliated Entomologist Department of Entomology and Nematology University of California Davis skdara@ucdavis.edu @calstrawberries @calveggies strawberriesvegetables VIII Congreso Nacional Hortifruticola, 31 March, 2016 berriesnveggies.tumblr.com enewsletters: ucanr.edu/strawberries-vegetables and ucanr.edu/pestnews Download the free ios app IPMinfo about strawberry pests and diseases

Strawberries Ranked 5 in California at a crop value of $2.5 billion California is the largest producer of strawberries in the USA and in the world

Production areas and trends

California Strawberries Value $2.5 billion About 87% of strawberries produced in the US come from California Fresh market 75% Processing market 25% Exported to Canada, Mexico, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea, Australia, UK and other countries 2010 statistics: Total acreage 37,608 ac or 15,225 ha Average yield 31.9 tons/ac or 78.8 tons/ha Average production cost: Non-harvest cost $54,000-62,000/ha Harvest cost $2.6/ tray (3.6 kg) or $57,000/ha at 78.8 ton/ha Estimated total cost $110,000-120,000/ha Estimated profit ~$50,000/ha

Strawberry flower and berry Fragaria x ananassa

Strawberry nursery production First generation Mother plants Daughter plants from runners 1-6 Meristem plants 100-1500 First generation daughter plants 200-300 Daughter plants in foundation block 50-150 Daughter plants in low elevation increase block 20-30 Daughter plants in high elevation production block 1 100 20,000 1,000,000 20,000,000

Strawberry nursery production First generation Mother plants -Daughter plants Meristem tips in tissue culture Daughter plants in low elevation increase block First generation daughter plants Daughter plants in high elevation production block First field generation plants in foundation block

Strawberry nursery production Tending to the mother and daughter plants Strawberry plant harvester

Strawberry nursery production Transplant cutting stations

Cultivars Short-day or June-bearing cultivars Require long nights or short days of 14 hours or less Produce during mild California winters Day-neutral or everbearing cultivars Produce throughout the year with favorable temperatures

Field selection Soil Water Nutrition Weed, pest or disease history Cropping history Crop rotation

Fumigation-Chemical Whole field fumigation Bed fumigation Fumigation with chloropicrin or 1, 3 dichloroprepene to control soilborne diseases, weeds and pests.

Bed making

Bed configuration

Bed configuration

Bed making-installing drip tape

Mulching and transplanting

Young and mature plants

Colored mulches

Fertilization-Macro nutrients Pre-plant application Nitrogen 90 lb/ac (100 kg/ha) Phosphorus 40 lb/ac (44 kg/ha) Potassium 65 lb/ac (72 kg/ha) After transplanting as needed Foliar application of micronutrients almost every week Approximate seasonal uptake of elemental NPK for 35 ton/ac average Plant Fruit Nitrogen 130 lb/ac (144 kg/ha) 90 lb/ac (100 kg/ha) Phosphorus 20 lb/ac (22 kg/ha) 20 lb/ac (22 kg/ha) Potassium 90 lb/ac (100 kg/ha) 140 lb/ac (155 kg/ha) Daily uptake for active spring and summer growing conditions (lower rates for winter) Nitrogen 1.2 lb/ac (1.3 kg/ha) Phosphorus 0.2 lb/ac (0.2 kg/ha) Potassium 1.3 lb/ac (1.5 kg/ha) These are based on a study conducted by Hartz et al. Crop needs vary depending on the field and crop.

Fertilization-Micro nutrients Estimates of average plant uptake over the entire season are: Zn 0.25 lb/ac (0.28 kg/ha) Fe 1.2 lb/ac (1.34 kg/ha) Mn 2.4 lb/ac (2.68 kg/ha) B 0.6 lb/ac (0.67 kg/ha) Cu 0.04 lb/ac (0.04 kg/ha)

Irrigation 2 hectare-feet for entire season Sprinklers for 4-6 weeks after planting Growing trend towards reduced or no sprinkler irrigation. Drip at 1-3 times a week

Micro-sprinkler vs. Standard Aluminum

Gallons of water/acre Cumulative irrigation volume 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Grower Standard Micro-sprinkler 120,000 gpa 81,600 gpa

Cultural practices Sanitation Moinitoring Erosion control Dust control Trap crops

Biological pest control Releasing predatory mites

Pruning for second year berries Pruning the plants New leaves from pruned plants Quality of the fruit reduced, but can save on some production costs. Plants serve as the source of infestation for pests and diseases and can increase management costs on the second year crop and for next season as well.

Harvesting Fresh fruit market

Harvesting Frozen fruit market

Safety and sanitation

Storage

High tunnels

Strawberries in Europe

Strawberries in Europe

IPMinfo app for Apple devices C BC A AB a a b ab

IPMinfo app for Apple devices C BC a a b ab

IPMinfo app for Apple devices C BC A AB a a b ab

Integrated Pest Management Integrated pest management (IPM) is an ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on long-term prevention of pests or their damage through a combination of techniques such as biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural practices, and use of resistant varieties. Pesticides are used only after monitoring indicates they are needed according to established guidelines, and treatments are made with the goal of removing only the target organism. Pest control materials are selected and applied in a manner that minimizes risks to human health, beneficial and non-target organisms, and the environment. UC IPM Resistant Varieties Chemical Control Natural Enemies Habitat Manipulation Chemical Control Cultural Practices

IPM strategies Chemical Botanical Cultural Biological PEST MANAGEMENT Host Plant Resistant Microbial Mechanical/ Physical Mating disruption

IPM and its components Within the group Within the community Biological Chemical Staying upto-date COMMUNICA- TION MANAGEMENT/ CONTROL Microbial IPM Actions PLANNING & ORGANIZATION KNOWLEDGE & RESOURCES Pest Managing Info Control options Monitoring Tools & Technology

Decision making for pest management Efficacy Economical Decision Resistance Management Sustainability

Status of biopesticides Projected value of $6 billion globally by 2020 Several major pesticide companies are investing in biopesticides Value of pesticides sold in California in 2012 $602 million and entomopathogenic fungi-based pesticides account for only 0.0005% (http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/mill/pdsd2012.pdf) EPF Other pesticides

Pounds of active ingredient Pesticide use in California strawberries Active Ingredient Pounds Abamectin 1,114 Acetami8prid 4,135 Bifenazate 22,161 Bifenthrin 5,252 Buprofezin 2,082 Chlorpyrifos 12,043 Chlorantraniliprole 2,152 Fenpyroximate 941 Fenpropathrin 5,794 Imidacloprid 5,639 Malathion 101,892 Naled 20,896 Novaluron 4,717 Pyperonyl butoxide 5,205 Spinetoram 3,086 Spinosad 1,155 Spiromesifen 6,700 Thiamethoxam 1,466 Chemical total 206,430 Azadirachtin 266 Bt 48,719 Beauveria bassiana 47 Pyrethrins 1,042 Bio-Botanical total 50,074 Pesticides 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 Chemical Bt Other Bio-Botanical http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur12rep/comrpt12.pdf

No. of Lygus per 20 strawberry plants Danitol Dibrom & Rimon Dibrom Danitol Dibrom & Rimon Brigade & Rimon Malathion & Rimon Malathion Dibrom Seasonal occurrence of lygus bug Conventional strawberry field (second year) 50 Nymphs Adults 40 30 20 10 0 Treatment threshold

Strawberry pests Lygus bug Twospotted spider mite Strawberry spider mite Lewis mite

2015 Strawberry IPM trial Sundance Berry Farms, Santa Maria

Chemicals-Mode of action groups 3A Pyrethrins-Sodium channel modulators 4A 4C 4D Neonicotinoids Sulfoximines Butenolides } Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor competitive modulators 9C Flonicamid Modulators of chordotonal organs 15 Benzoylureas - Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis

Non-chemical alternatives Entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana, Isaria fumosorosea, and Metarhizium brunneum Botanical insect growth regulator, azadirachtin Mechanical removal - vacuuming

Entomopathogenic fungus mode of action

Azadirachtin mode of action http://files.meistermedia.net/cpd/images/structures/largeview/azadirachtin.gif Interferes with protein synthesis Affects molting and metamorphosis Disturbs mating and sexual communication Sterilizes adults Reduces reproductive ability Acts as antifeedant and repellent

Vacuuming

Lygus bug management study 1 st application (Rate/acre) 2 nd application (Rate/acre) 3 rd application (Rate/acre) 1 Untreated Untreated Untreated 2 Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A* Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A 3 Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum 4 Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A Met52 EC(16 fl oz) + Debug Turbo (104 fl oz) 5 Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C Vacuum 6 Pfr-97 (2 lb) + Neemix (9 fl oz) 7 Vacuum Pfr-97 (2 lb) + Neemix (9 fl oz) Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D + Debug Turbo (104 fl oz) Met52 EC (16 fl oz) + AzaGuard (16 fl oz) Vacuum 8 Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Vacuum Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A 9 Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Beleaf 50 SG (2.8 oz) 9C 10 B. bassiana+neem (1qrt) B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A+neem (1qrt) B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt) 11 B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt) B. bassiana+neem (1qrt) Beleaf 50 SG (2.8 oz) 9C 12 B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt) Vacuum *MoA group 3A Pyrethrins-Sodium channel modulators 9C Flonicamid Modulators of chordotonal organs Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A 4A Neonicotinoids } Nicotinic acetylcholine 4C Sulfoximines receptor competitive 4D Butenolides modulators 15 Benzoylureas - Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis

Sampling

Number/20 plants Lygus life stages after three applications 40 30 Young Nymphs Pre-treatment Post-treatment 20 10 0 8 6 4 2 0 Old Nymphs a ab ab b b ab ab ab ab ab ab Tukey s HSD P = 0.012 ab 8 6 Adults 4 2 0

Percent change post-treatment Change in lygus bug populations 100 80 85.71 78.26 70.83 60 46.75 40 32.66 27.27 20 0 11.54 8.02 7.82 0.00-20 -12.10-40 -28.90

Treatment efficacy Rank % Change I Spray II Spray III Spray I -28.9 Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C* Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Beleaf 50 SG (2.8 oz) 9C II -12.1 Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D Vacuum III 0.0 IV 7.8 B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt) Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A Vacuum Met52 EC(16 fl oz) + Debug Turbo (104 fl oz) Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A Met52 EC (16 fl oz) + AzaGuard (16 fl oz) V 8.0 Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A* Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A VI 11.5 Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum VII 27.3 Vacuum VIII 32.7 IX 46.8 Pfr-97 (2 lb) + Neemix (9 fl oz) B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt) Sivanto (14 fl oz) 4D + Debug Turbo (104 fl oz) Pfr-97 (2 lb) + Neemix (9 fl oz) Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A Vacuum B. bassiana+neem (1qrt) Beleaf 50 SG (2.8 oz) 9C X 70.8 Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C Vacuum XI 78.3 Untreated Untreated Untreated XII 85.7 B. bassiana+neem (1qrt) *Mode of action group B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A +neem (1qrt) B. bassiana+pyrethrum 3A (1qrt)

Acknowledgements Grower and Team Dave Murray, Sundance Berry Farms Ted Ponce Industry Partners Agro Logistics Systems, Arysta LifeScience, Bayer CropScience, BioSafe Systems, Certis USA, Dow AgroSciences, Helena Chemicals, Laverlam International Corp., and Monsanto BioAg Technical assistance Sundance Berry Farms field crew Chris Martinez Fritz Light Kristin Nicole Stegeman Tamas Zold

2014 Strawberry IPM trial 1 st application (Rate/acre) 2 nd application (Rate/acre) 3 rd application (Rate/acre) 1 Untreated Untreated Untreated 2 Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A* Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A 3 Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Assail 30SG (6.9 oz) 4A Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Sequoia SC (4.5 fl oz) 4C Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Assail 30SG (6.9 oz) 4A 4 Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Brigade (16 oz) 3A BotaniGard ES (2 qrt) + Molt-X (8 fl oz) BotaniGard ES (2 qrt) + Molt-X (8 fl oz) 5 Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Assail 30SG (6.9 oz) 4A Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Beleaf 50 SG (2.8 oz) 9C Rimon 0.83 EC (12 fl oz) 15 + Assail 30SG (6.9 oz) 4A 6 BotaniGard ES (2 qrt) + Molt-X (8 fl oz) BotaniGard ES (2 qrt) + Low Beleaf 50 SG (1.4 oz) 9C Low BotaniGard ES (1 qrt) + Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C 7 Actara (4 oz) 4A Actara (4 oz) 4A + Agri-Mek SC (3.5 fl oz) 6 BotaniGard ES (2 qrt) + Molt-X (8 fl oz) 8 High Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C High Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C High Sequoia (4.5 oz) 4C 9 Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C 10 High Diafil 610 Slurry (70 lb) Low BotaniGard ES (1 qrt) + Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C 11 Low Diafil 610 Slurry (35 lb) Low Sequoia (3 oz) 4C + Molt-X (8 fl oz) 12 High Diafil 610 Dust (70 lb) Low BotaniGard ES (1 qrt) + Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A *MoA group 4A Neonicotinoids 4C Sulfoximines 6 Chloride channel activators 9C Selective homopteran feeding blockers Met52 EC(16 fl oz) + Assail 70 WP (3 oz) 4A Met52 EC(16 fl oz) Met52 EC (16 fl oz) + Molt-X (8 fl oz) 15 Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis

Change in lygus populations 1200 1083 1000 800 600 400 383 367 307 280 200 0 167 143 81 54 48 17 14

Treatment efficacy Rank %Change I Spray II Spray III Spray Cost/ac I 14 Sequoia High Sequoia High Sequoia High $143.82 II 17 Diafil Dust High BotaniGard Low + Met52 + Assail 70WP Molt-X $385.74 III 48 Rimon + Rimon + Rimon + Assail 30SG Beleaf 50SG Assail 30SG $178.42 IV 54 Rimon + BotaniGard ES + BotaniGard ES + Brigade Molt-X Molt-X $333.39 V 81 Sequoia Low Sequoia Low Sequoia Low $95.88 VI 143 Diafil Slurry High Sequoia Low + Met52 + BotaniGard ES Low Assail 70WP $378.22 VII 167 Rimon + Rimon + Rimon + Assail 30SG Sequoia High Assail 30SG $195.43 VIII 280 Actara Actara + BotaniGard ES + Agri-Mek Molt-X $180.60 IX 307 BotaniGard ES + Molt-X BotaniGard ES + Beleaf 50SG Low BotaniGard ES Low + Sequoia Low $178.42 X 367 Diafil Slurry Low Sequoia Low Met52 + Molt-X $218.12 XI 383 Untreated Untreated Untreated 0 XII 1083 Assail 70WP Assail 70WP Assail 70WP $126.63

Acknowledgements Growers/Collaborators Francisco Bautista Technicians Andrew Reade Anthony Reade Michael McNulty Ryan Sheppard Industry collaborators Bioworks Chemtura Dow AgroSciences Imerys Monsanto BioAg Syngenta

2013 Strawberry Miticide trial Treatments 1. Untreated 2. Acramite 50 WS (bifenazate) 1 lb 3. Agri-Mek SC (abamectin) 4.29 fl oz 4. BotaniGard ES (B. bassiana) 1qrt + Acramite 0.75 lb 5. Eco-Mite 1% (rosemary and cotton seed oils) 6. Fujimite 5 EC (fenpyroximate) 2 pt 7. Fujimite XLO 2 pt 8. Grandevo (C. subtsugae) 2 lb 9. Venerate 2 gal 10. Nealta (cyflumetofen) 13.7 fl oz Spraying Plot size 150 gal/acre at 70 psi with hollow cone nozzle 14 longx44 wide bed replicated 4 times Treated on May 16 and 25, 2013 Sampled 3 and 7 days after each spray application

Post-treatment number/leaflet 2013 Strawberry Miticide trial 80 Eggs Mobile 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Tukey s HSD P > 0.05

Percent change compared to control 2013 Strawberry Miticide trial 0 Eggs Mobile -10-20 -30-40 -50-60

Conclusions Non-chemical alternatives such as microbial and botanical pesticides play a critical role in pest management Integration of all available tools is important for developing sound IPM strategies

Thank you!