Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

Similar documents
Results of New Cultivar Selection Trials for Orange in Arizona

Achieving larger Ettinger fruit by foliar application of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Use of Plant Growth Regulators to Increase Fruit Set, Fruit Size and Yield and to Manipulate Vegetative and Floral Shoot Growth

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Berelex. Introducing 40 SG. Berelex 40 SG Plant Growth Regulator A 21 st century formulation for fruit and vegetable management

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Effects of calcium sprays and AVG on fruit quality at harvest and after storage

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Project Concluding: Summary Report Mandarin Trial for the California Desert

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 111 December 2016

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Soybean Production State Extension Conference

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Report of Progress 961

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Acreage Forecast

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

POWERFUL INSECT CONTROL IN CITRUS

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Padthaway PADTHAWAY VINTAGE OVERVIEW

ProGibb LV Plus Plant Growth Regulator to Increase Fruit Size and Yield of Avocados

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

P E C A N R E P O R T

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Figure 1: Quartely milk production and gross value

Retailing Frozen Foods

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

Report of Progress 945

Report of Progress 961

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

ANALYSIS ON THE STRUCTURE OF HONEY PRODUCTION AND TRADE IN THE WORLD

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Overview of the US Blueberry Industry

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

2007 RETAIN RESEARCH RESULTS AND MANAGEMENT OF SCALES INFESTING WALNUTS

Coffee market ends 2016/17 coffee year in deficit for the third consecutive year

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

A new approach to understand and control bitter pit in apple

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

CHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS?

Spider Mite Management in Walnuts. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UCCE Kern County Tri-County Walnut Day, 2008

Coffee market ends 2017/18 in surplus

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Agriculture and Food Authority

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

European Grapevine Moth, Lobesia botrana: The Year in Review

Onions for All Seasons and Tastes. Domestic Onion Production. Spring/Summer Fresh Onions. Fall/Winter Storage Onions. The Color of Onions

Harvesting Charges for Florida Citrus, 2016/17

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

The Columbian Exchange and Global Trade

Evaluation of FŪSN ( ) on Umatilla Potato Production

An Overview of the U.S. Bell Pepper Industry. Trina Biswas, Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu University of Florida

World of sugar PAGE 54

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Sample. TO: Prof. Hussain FROM: GROUP (Names of group members) DATE: October 09, 2003 RE: Final Project Proposal for Group Project

Ai Arizona Citrus Trends. Scott Halver Appraiser Ganado Group

Climate Limitations and Vineyards in Arizona

Transcription:

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size - 2006 Item Type text; Article Authors Wright, Glenn C. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Citrus Research Report Download date 03/05/2018 08:27:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/223662

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size - 2006 1 Glenn C. Wright Department of Plant Sciences, U. of A., Yuma Mesa Agriculture Center, Yuma, AZ Abstract Lemons were treated with several plant growth regulators for the 2006-07 season, with the hope of improving fruit size. These PGR s included Bluestim, Accel, Maxim and MT1350. Although there were some increases in yield, these were just trends, and were not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no improvement in fruit size with application of the treatments. Introduction The desert lemon industry is facing increasing competition from both foreign and domestic sources. Lemons from Argentina were considered to be quite a threat, until regulatory and disease issues prevent that fruit from being shipped to the US. In recent years, lemons from Chile have captured a large portion of the Japanese market; a market that is quite profitable for the desert lemon grower. Now we are seeing increasing competition from Mexican lemons. Lemons from Spain, South Africa, Australia and the Bahamas sometimes appear in the produce departments of US grocers. From within the US, stored lemons from District 2 compete with desert fruit in the early part of the season. Use of gibberellins has allowed the Coastal California fruit to have a longer storage life when the market is at its highest. Meanwhile, the advent of lemons from District 1 can shrink profits later in the year. What is a desert lemon grower to do? Although increasing market share is always desirable, the lemon producer has no influence on that. Fruit quality and size is the only way to command a higher price. Most growers can achieve good quality with appropriate insect and mite control, and fertilization. But fruit size is can sometimes be a problem. Figure 1 illustrates the fact that large fruit are more valuable in the market between September 1 st and March 1 st, when desert fruit is typical available. In Spain, growers typically apply an auxin known as 3,5,6-TPA (Maxim, Dow Agrosciences) is typically applied to lemons following the June drop to size the fruit. Our lab experimented using this compound several years ago, and found that it can sometimes work, but it is not always consistent. We have also done one year s work on Accel, a PGR formulation of auxin and gibberellin. This work needs to be continued to test its validity. It is apparent that desert lemon growers require a PGR that is registered and consistent. Since 1999, several purported compounds have become available for use on citrus, and many claim to improve fruit size. These include synthetic auxins, compounds containing natural auxins, and other plant growth regulators. Our objective for this study is to test several of these compounds for their consistent efficacy in improving lemon size.. 1 The author wishes to thank Mr. Marco Peña, and Yuma Mesa Fruit Growers Association for their assistance in completing this project. The author would also like to thank the Arizona Citrus Research Council for supporting this research. This is a final report for project 2006-02 Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size - 2005. Citrus Research Report (P-153) October 2007 7

Materials and Methods This experiment was established in 2005 at the Yuma Mesa Agriculture Center, in blocks 8 and 9. Treatments are as follows: Untreated Control Maxim - 17.6 tablets per acre Maxim is the trade name for the auxin 3,5,6 TPA, and is manufactured by Dow Agrosciences. Bluestim - 4 lb. per acre - Bluestim is a glycine betaine product that is meant to help the plant resist stress, and is distributed for Monterey Ag. Resources. Accel 1.80% @ 44 oz/acre Accel is a cytokinin product manufactured by Valent Inc. MT 1350 @ 4 pts/acre in late May and mid-june. MT 1350 is a product derived from plant-based lipids that purports to increase fruit size. MT 1350 @ 4 pts/acre in late June and mid-july MT 1350 @ 4 pts/acre in late July and mid-august. For all treatments, spray volume was 100 GPA, and the materials were applied using an air-blast sprayer. NUFilm surfactant was used in all cases. The spray date for the Maxim was 6/15/06. For the Bluestim the first spray date was 7/20/06, and again on 8/23/06. The Accel was applied on 6-27-06. The MT1350 was applied on 5/30 and 6/14 for the late may and mid-june application, on 6/29 and 7/14 for the late June and mid-july application, and on 7/31 and 8/23 for the late July and mid-august applications. Time of applications was 6:30 AM. Trial Design was Randomized Complete Block, with a plot size of eight trees per plot. There were five replications. Irrigation is border flood, and normal cultural practices are used. Yield data was collected in its entirety on 9-29-06, and 2006-07 was the second harvest year for this trial. Yields for the entire 8-tree plot were harvested by commercial harvesters into bins. For each harvest date, about 90 lbs. of harvested fruit from each plot was passed through an automated electronic eye sorter (Autoline, Inc., Reedley, CA), which provides weight, color, exterior quality and size data for each fruit. Fruit packout data is reported on a percentage basis. There was no significant difference in packout, fruit shape or fruit color due to treatment. All data was analyzed using SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Results and Discussion Yields from the trial are shown in Figure 2. Although MT1350 at late July and mid-august (about 8 and 6 weeks before harvest) had about 17% more yield than the untreated control, variability among the plots precluded statistical significance. This result was similar to our results for the 2 and 4 week prior to harvest application for 2005-06, which led to a 20% increase in yield, but was non-significant. All the other treatments were similar to the untreated control. Similarly, there were no significant differences in packout among the treatments (Figure 2). Hopefully, we will see an improvement in the third season. Citrus Research Report (P-153) October 2007 8

Price per carton ($) 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 6/2/03 6/30/03 7/28/03 8/25/03 9/22/03 10/20/03 11/17/03 12/15/03 1/12/04 2/9/04 3/8/04 4/5/04 5/3/04 5/31/04 Size 75 Size 95 Size 115 Size 140 Size 165 Size 200 Size 235 Date Figure 1. 2003-04 Los Angeles terminal market prices for fancy grade lemons. Citrus Research Report (P-153) October 2007 9

Accel 1.80% @ 44 oz/acre Maxim 17 tablets/acre Bluestim @ 8 oz. per acre MT 1350 Late July and mid-august MT1350 Late June and mid-july MT1350 Late May and mid-june Untreated Control 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Yield (lbs. per tree) Figure 2. Yields of lemons treated with various plant growth regulators for the 2006-07 season. There was no significant difference between the treatments. Citrus Research Report (P-153) October 2007 10

MT 1350 Late July and mid-august MT 1350 Late June and mid-july MT 1350 Late May and mid-june Treatment Accel 1.80% @ 44 oz/acre Bluestim @ 8 oz/acre Maxim 17 tablets/acre Untreated Control 0 20 40 60 80 100 Packout (%) Figure 3. Packout of lemons treated with various plant growth regulators for the 2006-07 season. There was no significant difference between the treatments. Citrus Research Report (P-153) October 2007 11