Evaluation of FŪSN ( ) on Umatilla Potato Production

Similar documents
THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Understanding Seasonal Nutritional Requirements

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

Red Clover Varieties for North-Central Florida

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

1999 Annual Report. RED-SKINNED AND CHIPPING POTATO VARIETY DEVELOPMENT K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton 1

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

2014 Oilseed Meal as a Fertility Amendment in Sweet Corn

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

SOYBEAN INOCULATION TRIAL Bob Henson

1. Planting tips for wheat planted after row crop harvest 1 2. Sunflower preharvest treatments 2 3. Fertilizer management for cool-season pastures 3

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Organic Seed Partnership

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

SWEET POTATO PRODUCTION. Kenneth Y. Takeda Assistant Specialist in Horticulture

Sacramento Valley Prune News

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

~culture Series No. 5~

Nutrient Management With Cover Crops. Darryl Warncke Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Grapevine Mineral Nutrition

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2010

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

Quality of western Canadian peas 2009

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Economic Losses from Pollution Closure of Clam Harvesting Areas in Machias Bay

Crop Load Management of Young Vines

QUARTELY MAIZE MARKET ANALYSIS & OUTLOOK BULLETIN 1 OF 2015

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Beth LaShell Fort Lewis College The Old Fort at Hesperus Amber Beye Program Assistant. Dr. Kevin Lombard and Jason Thomas New Mexico State University

Sprouting in Storage

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Effect of balanced nutrition and nitrogen form on coffee productivity, bean quality and the environment -Experiences with Robusta in Vietnam-

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

GALA SPLITTING WASHINGTON TREE FRUIT POSTHARVEST CONFERENCE. March 13 th & 14 th, 2001, Wenatchee, WA PROCEEDINGS, Gala Splitting page 1 of 6

Selection of good seed is a

2009 National Cool-Season Traffic Trial. Seed Companies and Breeders. Kevin N. Morris, Executive Director. DATE: July 6, 2009

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Recalibration for Sunflower

30 Years of Strawberries. Powell Smith, PhD Extension Associate Lexington, SC USA

COMPARISON OF SEEDING RATES AND COATING ON SEEDLING COUNT, ROOT LENGTH, ROOT WEIGHT AND SHOOT WEIGHT OF CRIMSON CLOVER

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2009

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Michigan State University 2015 Seedless Pickling Cucumber Variety Trial

1

POTATOES USA / SNAC-INTERNATIONAL OUT-OF-STORAGE CHIP QUALITY MICHIGAN REGIONAL REPORT

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Evaluation of Gouda cheese available in the Egyptian market.

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Red-Skinned and Chipping Potato Variety Development Kenneth A. Rykbost and Brian A. Charlton 1 A

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Transcription:

Evaluation of FŪSN (26-0-0-14) on Umatilla Potato Production Galen Mooso, Ph.D., Agronomy Manager, and Terry A. Tindall, Ph.D., Director of Agronomy Wilder, Idaho, 2015

Figure 1. Comparison of tubers from four random potato plants comparing the top-dress applications of FŪSN @ 100 lbs of N/ac (left) to ammonium sulfate @100 lbs N/ac (right). Photo taken September 23, 2015. FŪSN (26-0-0-14) is a new ammonium-sulfate nitrate nitrogen fertilizer that is being manufactured at the Simplot Lathrop California plant. FŪSN is a 3:1 salt of ammonium to nitrate nitrogen form that has some unique characteristics such as decreased ammonia volatility. FŪSN is a safe nitrogen replacement for ammonium nitrate and it has potential for use in commercial potato production systems in Idaho. As such there is a need for evaluation of this new nitrogen (N) fertilizer in potato production and how it may affect not only potato yields but also potato quality factors. Page 1 of 5

Arena Valley Field 1B Mean soil test analysis (34 samples) before planting: ph=7.7 CEC=13.1 O.M.=1.65 STP=81 STK=591 77-acre field was divided into four equal plots Preplant applications included: 25 lb N as AMS/ac 100 lb S/ac 20 lb K 2O/ac as K-Mag 4 lb Mn/ac STK=591 FŪSN GSP w/ams FŪSN Planter Band (10 gal 11-37-0 + 3 gal Thio-Sol, 2 gal Golden Bio, 1 qt EDTA Zn, 1 qt EDTA Mn and 1 qt Bio Max per acre) GSP w/ams Feet 0 125 250 500 Top Dress 100 lbs N/acre applied April 3, 2015 Figure 2. Arena Valley Field 1B is a 75-acre, linear-irrigated field in the Arena Valley. Methods The location for this study was a Simplot commercial potato production field (75 acres) in Arena Valley near Wilder, Idaho (Figure 2). The preplant fertilizer applications were exactly the same across the entire field and the starter fertilizer application was also the same as noted in Figure 2. The field was divided into four quarters; two quarters received FŪSN topdressing at 100 lbs of N/ac and the other two quarters received the grower standard practice (GSP) of 100 lbs of N/ac as ammonium sulfate (AMS=21-0-0-24) in a topdress application. Umatilla potatoes were planted on April 11 and top-dress N applications were made on April 25. The whole field was managed and irrigated as a single field. Petiole samples were taken at approximately two-week intervals starting June 5 and ending August 5 from each treatment area and then treatments were averaged. The field was commercially harvested on October 15. During commercial harvest a crossover potato digger (four rows wide) lifted four rows of potatoes and laid them on top of the ground before a second potato digger dug four rows, collected the original four rows (eight total), and then loaded the potatoes into a field truck. Five hand-harvested samples (four rows 10 feet long = 40 linear feet of row = 100 ft 2 ) were collected from each quarter of the field behind the crossover digger (for 20 total samples). Composite samples from each quarter were submitted to the Simplot Project Idaho plant for federal/state inspection. Information from the inspection report was applied to the Simplot 2015 Ranger Russet potato contract to establish net grower returns of the comparison of FŪSN to AMS. Page 2 of 5

Results In-season potato petiole samples were initially higher for FŪSN top-dressed plants and then were similar later in the season (Figure 3). For the FŪSN-fertilized plants, nitrate concentrations started out at more than 25,000 ppm and decreased to less 15,000 ppm by the last sampling in August, which is ideal for potato production in Idaho. No visible differences due to nitrogen source on top-dress N application were observed during the growing season. 30,000 2015 Petiole Nitrate, ppm 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5000 FŪSN GSP (AMS) 0 6/5 6/15 6/25 7/5 7/15 Sample Date 7/25 8/4 8/14 8/24 Figure 3. Effect of FŪSN on Umatilla potato petiole nitrate concentrations. In cooperation with the Simplot SmartFarm group, Arena Valley 1B was included in a satellite flyover every two weeks during the growing season. Composite photosynthesis analysis of the field for the July 27 satellite flyover is presented in Figure 4. There was not any NDVI difference in the field that could be detected by the satellite photo analysis. The potatoes looked very good throughout the season. Page 3 of 5

Figure 4. Arena Valley 1B composite photosynthesis taken on July 27, 2015, show that there was no observable differences in satellite NDVI readings between the grower standard practice (AMS) and FŪSN. A 147 cwt/ac (7.35 t/ac) increase in total potato yield was observed for the 20 hand samples of Umatilla Russet potatoes top-dressed with FŪSN compared to the potatoes top-dressed with ammonium sulfate (Figure 5). There was a 52 cwt/ac increase in the yield of 6 10 oz and greater Potato Yield Less Dirt, cwt/ac 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 545 340 91 35 79 GSP w/ AMS 2015 692 392 105 40 76 GSP + FŪSN Unusable Process Undersize 4 6 oz 6 oz < Figure 5. Payable potato yield (field weight less dirt) for Umatilla potatoes top dressed with FŪSN compare the ammonium sulfate. Page 4 of 5

than 10 oz tubers for potatoes top-dressed with FŪSN (392 versus 340 cwt). There was a 14 cwt increase in the 4 6 oz size fraction for potatoes top-dressed with FŪSN. This data suggests that the form of nitrogen applied to potatoes in-season has an effect on total yield and tuber size. Composite samples (approximately 1,000 lbs) from each quarter of the field were retained and delivered to the Simplot potato processing plant for evaluation by the Federal/State of Idaho Inspection Service. Grower returns are based on the grade of the potatoes and the Simplot contract. Top-dressing with FŪSN increased the percentage of U.S. No. 1 grade potatoes by 17%. Results in potatoes of greater than 6 oz were similar, as were results in process undersize potatoes. The N top-dress source had no effect on fry color or specific gravity both important potato quality traits. The other important quality parameters were similar. With the increase in payable yield and in U.S. No. 1 potatoes with the FŪSN topdressing, grower payout was increased by $1,084/acre based on the 2015 Simplot processing contract. Evaluation of in-season FŪSN topdress applications for Umatilla potato production will continue in 2016 in cooperation with Simplot Land and Livestock in Arena Valley. Effect of FŪSN (26-0-0-14) on Umatilla Russet Potato Quality Factors 1 Potato Quality Traits GSP GSP + FŪSN US# 1 24% 41% 6 oz. < 73% 73% Process Undersize Unusable Bruise Free 7% 15% n/a 7% 13% n/a Specific Gravity Fry Color 0 Sugar Ends Simplot Ranger Contact Return, $/ac 1.080 1.086 100% 98% 0% 0% $2,776 $3,860 Based on random yield samples taken at harvest and then evaluated by the inspection service 1, FŪSN increased grower returns by $1,084/ac based on 2015 Simplot contract pricing. 1 State of Idaho Federal/State Inspection Service Figure 6. Potato quality traits and net returns for Ranger Russet potatoes as affected by top-dress N applications. Page 5 of 5

Simplot is a registered trademark of J.R. Simplot Company. FŪSN is a trademark of J.R. Simplot Company.