Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

Similar documents
Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage*

G Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage

Corn Growth and Development

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Identifying Soybean Growth Stages

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Cotton Crop Maturity Determination

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Croptime Growth Stage Guide

Cotton Crop Maturity Determination

Purdue University Department of Agronomy

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

SOYBEAN GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT

The University of Georgia

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Some Common Insect Enemies

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

2010 Area Crops Evaluation Exam

Let s Preserve: Tomatoes and Tomato Products

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

THE GROWTH OF THE CHERRY OF ROBUSTA COFFEE

ational Sunflower Survey: An Overview

Harvest Aids in Soybeans - Application Timing and Value. J.L. Griffin, C.A. Jones, L.M. Etheredge, Jr., J. Boudreaux, and D.Y.

FALL TO WINTER CRANBERRY PLANT HARDINESS

PLANTING WHEAT SEED DAMAGED BY FROST BEFORE HARVEST

2016 NCIS Agronomic. Chickpea research in Washington.

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

Soybean. Germination. A Visual Guide to. Growth Stages. cotyledons. radicle. hypocotyl. radicle. growing point. Vegetative Stage Emergence.

Rice Paddy in a Bucket

THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

United States Standards for Grades of Walnuts (Juglans regia) in the Shell

Sorghum Grading Procedures

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

ELECTRONIC OVEN CONTROL GUIDE

Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Pecan Pollination. Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia, Horticulture Department

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Proposed Excess Loss (Pure Premium) Factors

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

The Cranberry. Sample file

Report of Progress 961

FINGER MILLET: Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.

ASEAN STANDARD FOR SWEET CORN (ASEAN Stan 28:2012)

FFA Meat Judging CDE

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

SYLLABUS. Departmental Syllabus. Food Production II CULN0140. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus

UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR WHOLE DRY PEAS¹

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Subpart M -- United States Standards for Wheat

Junior Participant Grain Grading Handbook. This book is for Junior participants only during a 4-H/FFA Crops Evaluation Contest.

Estimating and Adjusting Crop Weight in Finger Lakes Vineyards

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Vineyard Mechanization at French Camp

5 Populations Estimating Animal Populations by Using the Mark-Recapture Method

Let s Preserve. Tomatoes. Bulletin #4085. Recommended Varieties. Quantity. Table 1. Quantities of Fresh Tomatoes Needed for Tomato Products

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

#611-7 Workbook REVIEW OF PERCOLATION TESTING PROCEDURES. After completing this chapter, you will be able to...

PROPOSED DRAFT STANDARD FOR AUBERGINES (At Step 5/8)

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Update on Wheat vs. Gluten-Free Bread Properties

Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing

Module 6. Yield and Fruit Size. Presenter: Stephan Verreynne

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MELAMINE TESTING OF RETAIL MEAT AND POULTY PRODUCTS

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

Crop Identification and BBCH Staging Manual: SMAP-12 Field Campaign

1 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations E-77-W E-77-W. Field Crops SOYBEAN INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Dry Beans XIII-5 Mexican Bean Beetle

Mastering Measurements

Michigan State University 2015 Seedless Pickling Cucumber Variety Trial

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

EFFECTS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND CONTROLLED FRUITING ON COTTON YIELD

United States Standards for Grades of Pistachio Nuts in the Shell

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

Foundation seed: one generation (refer to Sections 2 and 3).

MEMO CODE: SP , CACFP , SFSP Smoothies Offered in Child Nutrition Programs. State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States

NEW! SMART SNACK COMPLIANT SFC # Whole Grain Chicken Egg Roll (2.5oz) Chef s Corner 1787 Sabre Street Hayward, CA CHEF

A.P. Environmental Science. Partners. Mark and Recapture Lab addi. Estimating Population Size

For your review, this is the first five pages of Chapter 7 of The Original Encyclopizza.

Improving Capacity for Crime Repor3ng: Data Quality and Imputa3on Methods Using State Incident- Based Repor3ng System Data

EFFECTS OF KAOLIN CLAY PARTICLE FILM ON LEAF TEMPERATURE, NUT TEMPERATURE AND SUNBURN SUSCEPTIBILITY IN WALNUT

Economic and Social Council

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

18 PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND CARBOHYDRATE PARTITIONING IN CRANBERRY

Transcription:

1 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM G86-812-A Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage* This NebGuide discusses the methods used by the hail insurance industry to assess yield loss due to hail damage in grain sorghum. C.A. Shapiro, Extension Soils Specialist T.A. Peterson, Research Technologist [Previous Category] [Catalog] [Order Info] Determining Sorghum Growth Stages Determining Losses Calculating Actual Loss Due to Hail A hailstorm can cause yield losses in sorghum ranging from slight to total. Research has been conducted to accurately predict the effects of hail damage on sorghum yields. Results from these studies are used by hail insurance companies to assess yield losses and determine adjustments paid to clients. Information in this NebGuide will acquaint producers with procedures used to assess sorghum hail damage. These procedures may also be useful in estimating crop yields wherever stand loss or defoliation occurs. Yield loss predictions are based on two factors: a) stage of growth at the time of damage, and b) the degree of plant damage. Plant damage is classified as either direct damage or defoliation. Direct damage is divided into three categories: stand reduction, stalk damage and head damage. Defoliation is the loss of leaf area which may lead to later yield losses. Each step of the adjustment process will be discussed. A worksheet (Figure 4) is provided to illustrate these adjustment procedures. Determining Sorghum Growth Stages Accurate determination of growth stage is necessary to determine yield loss due to hail. Table I lists and describes sorghum growth stages and indicates the number of days until the next growth stage for a typical 120-day grain sorghum hybrid. Vegetative growth stages are called leaf stages and are identified by the number of exposed leaves. Table I. Description of sorghum growth stages.*

2 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM Stage Vegetative Stages Emergence to 11-Leaf Stage 11-Leaf Stage 12-Leaf Stage 13-Leaf to 20-Leaf Stage Description Time intervals is 32 days. One-half of the 11th actual leaf is exposed. The collar of the ninth and the tip of the 13th leaf are visible. Time interval is four days. One-half of the 12th leaf exposed, 10th leaf collars, tip of the 14th leaf visible, (four days). Add one leaf to 12-leaf stage for leaf exposed, leaf collar and leaf visible. Interval between each stage is three days from 13-leaf stage to the 17-leaf stage and for the 20-leaf stage. 18- and 19-leaf stage interval is two days. Reproductive Stages Early Boot Boot has started to swell, head is extended to just below the flag leaf (three days). Boot Head almost full size and starting to emerge from the sheath of the flag leaf (two days). Just Headed More than 50 percent of the heads have emerged from the boot--no blossoms showing (two days). Bloom All heads have emerged from the boot and more than 50 percent of the heads show yellow pollen tubes over more than 50 percent of each head (five days). Blister Grain is in a watery form and only partially formed--no color to liquid (four days). Early Milk Grain is fully formed. Substance is a clear to slightly white, milky liquid. Removal of fluid from grain would leave only the hull (six days). Milk Substance is thick milky liquid, no solids (seven days). Late Milk Grain has reached a semi-solid form (seven days). Soft Dough When grain is crushed, a white substance emerges in a semi-solid form (six days). Dough When grain is crushed, a white substance emerges in an almost solid form (six days). Hard Dough Grain is firm and nothing emerges when crushed (six days). Mature Physiological maturity has been reached. Less than 40 percent moisture content. A thin black layer has developed on bottom tip of grain. *All stages are based on 50 percent of the plants at or beyond a given stage of development. Prior to the boot stage, a stage indicator leaf is used to determine the growth stage. This leaf is found on the top of the plant, and is the leaf which is about one-half exposed. After the first few leaves have been sloughed off, the node identification system is used to determine leaf stage. Figure 1 shows a longitudinal view of a split stalk. The seventh leaf is attached to the top of the first elongated internode. After determining the seventh leaf, count upward until the indicator leaf is identified.

3 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM Figure 1. Enlarged view of lower stalk. To use the accompanying tables and loss procedures properly, the total number of leaves produced by the plant must be determined. This can be accomplished by unrolling the unemerged leaves from the whorl. If this cannot be done, wait until later in the season to determine ultimate leaf number. Typical ultimate leaf numbers for Nebraska range from 15 in the high plains of western Nebraska to 19 in the southeast. 1. Determining Losses Stand Reduction is a measure of the number of plants killed by the storm. In order to determine the yield loss due to stand reduction, the pre-storm plant population is compared to the remaining stand 7-10 days after the storm. Pre-storm population is determined by counting the original number of plants in 100 feet of row. (We suggest four rows 25 feet long.) Count the number of destroyed plants (growing point killed) by hail in the 100 feet of row. Do this in several representative locations in each field. Divide the average number of destroyed plants by the average number of original plants. The result is the gross percent stand reduction. Avg no. plants destroyed (in 100 ft of row) = gross percent Avg no. original plants (in 100 ft of row) Use the stand reduction curve (Figure 2) to determine stand loss from the tenth leaf stage until the flag leaf (ultimate leaf formed) is fully exposed. Due to the nature of the sorghum plant, hail rarely reduces stand before the tenth leaf stage. To determine percent yield loss, find the gross percent stand reduction damage along the bottom axis then read percent yield loss on the vertical axis. For reproductive growth stages (after the flag leaf is exposed), yield loss is directly proportional to stand loss. For example, a 30 percent stand loss at the boot stage equals a 30 percent yield loss.

4 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM Figure 2. Percent yield loss of sorghum due to stand reduction. Use between 10-leaf stage and reproductive stages. 2. Stalk damage is difficult to accurately assess immediately following a hailstorm. Bruising is minor if it does not penetrate into the stalk, as evidenced by discoloration in the stalk interior. If the bruises do penetrate into the stalk or there is potential lodging, it is recommended that final adjustment be deferred until later in the season. Heavy defoliation between bloom and soft dough stages may induce lodging. When evaluated later in the season, damaged plants which do not produce harvestable heads will be considered "totally destroyed" and contribute to stand reduction losses. 3. Figure 3. Sorghum head structure. Head loss is a measure of destruction of kernels in the head by hail. In order to determine the gross percent head damage, the number of kernels destroyed by hail is divided by the total number of kernels per head. Count the number of spikelets on an average sorghum head (Figure 3). Take three spikelets from a typical head--one from the top, middle, and bottom--and count the number of kernels on each spikelet. Average the three spikelet counts to get an average number of kernels per spikelet. Determine the number of kernels per head: No. of spikelets No. of kernels kernels = per head per spikelet per head

5 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM 4. The number of kernels destroyed can be estimated by the number of missing and partially destroyed spikelets. Determine the number of kernels destroyed in 10 heads at several representative locations and calculate the average kernels lost per head. Gross percent head damage is determined by dividing the kernels destroyed by kernels per head: Avg no. of kernels lost per head = Gross percent head loss No. of kernels per head Defoliation is measured as a percent of exposed leaf area destroyed during the storm. Percent defoliation is more accurate if evaluation is done 7-10 days after the storm. Leaf tissue that is green and still attached to the plant will continue to produce photosynthate, and is not considered leaf area destroyed. To determine the amount of leaf area destroyed, examine each exposed leaf and estimate leaf area present before the storm. Then for each leaf, estimate percent defoliation. (There is a tendency to overestimate defoliation percentage. Each leaf should be examined individually.) Evaluate a number of plants from several representative places in each field. Follow these steps: 1. 2. 3. Determine growth stage and ultimate leaf number if still in a vegetative stage. Determine percent defoliation by summing percent defoliation for each leaf and dividing by number of leaves on the plant. Use Table II to determine gross percent yield loss due to defoliation. Table II. Grain sorghum defoliation loss charts. Vegetative Stages For 15 Ultimate Leaves: Percent Defoliation Leaf Stage 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 9 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 10 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 1 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 12 1 3 6 10 12 17 21 27 31 37 13 1 3 8 14 17 23 30 36 43 50 14 2 4 10 16 20 26 34 41 49 57 15 2 7 13 18 22 30 38 47 56 65 For 17 Ultimate Leaves: Percent Defoliation Leaf Stage 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 11 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 12 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

6 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM 13 0 1 3 5 6 9 11 14 17 20 14 1 3 6 10 12 17 21 27 31 37 15 1 3 8 14 17 23 30 36 43 50 16 2 4 10 16 20 26 34 41 49 57 17 2 7 13 18 22 30 38 47 56 65 For 19 Ultimate Leaves: Percent Defoliation Leaf Stage 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 11 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 12 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 13 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 0 1 3 5 6 9 11 14 17 20 15 0 2 5 9 11 15 19 28 28 33 16 1 3 7 11 14 19 24 30 35 41 17 1 3 8 14 17 23 30 36 43 50 18 2 4 10 16 20 26 34 41 49 57 19 2 7 13 18 22 30 38 47 56 65 Reproductive Stages Percent Defoliation Stages 102030405060708090100 Early boot 3 8 15 21 26 36 45 55 66 77 Boot 4 1018253142536578 90 Just headed 4 1220273445587185 98 Bloom 4 1 19 26 33 44 57 69 83 96 Blister 3 9 17233040516274 86 Early milk 3 8 15 21 26 36 45 55 66 77 Milk 2 7 13 17 22 30 38 46 55 64 Late Milk 2 5 10 14 17 23 30 36 43 50 Soft dough 1 3 7 10 12 16 21 25 30 35 Dough 1 2 5 6 8 11 14 17 20 23 Hard dough 0 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 12 Phy. mature 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: For ultimate leaf numbers 16 and 18 estimate figures between the charts shown. Calculating Actual Loss Due to Hail

7 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM Figure 4 is a worksheet for estimating percent yield loss due to hail damage. Two examples are shown; the first is for a hailstorm occurring at a vegetative stage and the second for a hailstorm occurring at a reproductive stage. The procedure first determines the amount of direct damage to the crop (stand reduction and head loss). Secondly, yield loss due to defoliation is determined based on the percent crop remaining (100% - direct damage). The actual yield loss due to hail is the sum of the direct and defoliation yield loss. These instructions are intended as a general guideline for assessing sorghum yield loss due to hail damage. Occasionally, it is difficult to determine actual loss on the first inspection. Therefore, insurance companies may defer final yield loss determination until later in the season. Although early season defoliation appears quite devastating, research and experience has shown that sorghum plants can recover under favorable growing conditions. Since regrowth is typical in sorghum plants, use these charts with caution when deciding whether to replant. Precise yield loss estimates should be left to trained hail adjusters. Figure 4. Sorghum Yield Loss Worksheet Examples Your A. Background Information: #1 #2 Figures C. a. Date of Loss (storm) 7/15 8/28 C. b. Inspection Date 7/21 9/7 B. Growth Stage (GS) C. a. Stage at Inspection Late 15 Milk C. b. Stage at Loss 13 Milk C. c. Ultimate # of Leaves 17 -- C. Determining Losses C. 1. Stands Reduction (SR) C. 6. a. Destroyed plants in 100 ft of row 100 30 C. 6. b. Original Plants in 100 ft of row 150 120 C. 6. c. Percent SR (1a/1b) 67% 25% C. 6. d. SR Yield Loss C. 6. d. i. If GS less than 10, no loss -- -- C. 6. d. ii. If GS between 11 and full leaf development, C. 6. d. ii. use Percent Gross Damage (1c) and Figure 2. 45% -- C. 6. d. iii. If GS is reproductive use Percent Gross Damage (1c) -- 25% C. 2. Stalk Damage C. 6. b. Usually deferred; if totally damaged add like stand reduction 0 0 C. 3. Head Loss C. 6. a. Avg # of spikelets per head -- 45 C. 6. b. Avg # of kernels per spikelet -- 30 C. 6. c. Avg # kernels per head (3a 3b) -- 1350 C. 6. d. Avg kernels destroyed per head -- 351 C. 6. e. Avg gross Percent Head Loss (3d/3c) -- 26%

8 of 8 6/11/2009 9:27 AM C. 4. Defoliation C. 6. a. Percent defoliation 50% 25% C. 6. b. Use Table II to determine percent yield loss 6% 10% C. 5. Calculating Actual Yield Loss Due to Hail C. 6. a. Reduced stand (1d + 2) 45% 25% C. 6. b. Percent remaining crop (100% - 5a) 55% 75% C. 6. c. Head damage yield loss (5b/100 3e) 0 19.5% C. 6. d. Total direct loss (5a + 5c) 45% 44.5% C. 6. e. Percent remaining (100-5d) 55% 55.5% C. 6. f. Defoliation Yield Loss (4b/100 5e) 3.3% 5.6% C. 6. Actual Loss (5d + 5f) 48.3% 50.1% *This NebGuide is based on the system developed by the National Crop Insurance Association (NCIA) (Publication No. 6851, Grain Sorghum Loss Instructions, Rev. 1980). Tables and illustrations reprinted with permission from NCIA. File G812 under: FIELD CROPS E-3, Sorghum Issued July 1986; 12,000 printed. Electronic version issued April 1997 pubs@unl.edu Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.