The effect of Saccharomyces strain and fermentation conditions on quality prameters of non-alcoholic beer

Similar documents
The Effect of Saccharomyces Strains and Fermentation Condition on the ph, Foam Property and CO2 Concentration of Non-alcoholic Beer (Ma-al-shaeer)

Decolorisation of Cashew Leaves Extract by Activated Carbon in Tea Bag System for Using in Cosmetics

Strategies for reducing alcohol concentration in wine

Determination of some nutritional value and organoleptic properties in fruity teas

RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL

Unit code: A/601/1687 QCF level: 5 Credit value: 15

Co-inoculation and wine

POLLUTION MINIMIZATION BY USING GAIN BASED FERMENTATION PROCESS

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

Process standardization of low-calories and low-sugar kalam

GUIDELINES TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF FUNGICIDAL AGRICULTURAL REMEDIES ON FERMENTATION PROCESSES AND WINE QUALITY

Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop Barley Samples of CDC PolarStar and AC Metcalfe

Timing of Treatment O 2 Dosage Typical Duration During Fermentation mg/l Total Daily. Between AF - MLF 1 3 mg/l/day 4 10 Days

Yeast and Flavour Production. Tobias Fischborn Lallemand Brewing

distinct category of "wines with controlled origin denomination" (DOC) was maintained and, in regard to the maturation degree of the grapes at

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Performance Broiler Chicks

Dr.Nibras Nazar. Microbial Biomass Production: Bakers yeast

Living Factories. Biotechnology SG Biology

Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop CDC Meredith Barley

2014 Crop Merit 57 Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Canadian Malting Barley Variety Norman

Making Ethanol 1 of 22 Boardworks Ltd 2012

The Purpose of Certificates of Analysis

Chair J. De Clerck IV. Post Fermentation technologies in Special Beer productions Bottle conditioning: some side implications

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

Submitted: September 16, 2009; Returned to authors for corrections: June 23, 2010; Approved: January 13, ABSTRACT

CONCENTRATION OF AROMA AND VITAMIN RICH FRUIT JUICES BY COMPLEX MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY

Preparation of a malt beverage from different rice varieties

August Instrument Assessment Report. Bactest - Speedy Breedy. Campden BRI

Bioethanol Production from Pineapple Peel Juice using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae


Evaluation of Quality Characteristics and Microbial Contamination of Saffron Samples Dried by Microwave

As described in the test schedule the wines were stored in the following container types:

30 YEARS OF FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION IN BRAZIL: identification and selection of dominant industrial yeast strains.

2013 Crop AAC Synergy Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

2. Materials and methods. 1. Introduction. Abstract

Parametric Studies on Batch Alcohol Fermentation Using Saccharomyces Yeast Extracted from Toddy

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

Fed-batch Alcoholic Fermentation of Palm Juice (Arenga pinnata Merr) : Influence of the Feeding Rate on Yeast, Yield and Productivity

DRAFT TANZANIA STANDARD

EFFECT OF SOME TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS ON THE CONTENT OF ACETALDEHYDE IN BEER

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

2012 Crop CDC Kindersley Malting & Brewing Trials

Audrey Page. Brooke Sacksteder. Kelsi Buckley. Title: The Effects of Black Beans as a Flour Replacer in Brownies. Abstract:

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Varietal Specific Barrel Profiles

Development and characterization of wheat breads with chestnut flour. Marta Gonzaga. Raquel Guiné Miguel Baptista Luísa Beirão-da-Costa Paula Correia

Influence of climate and variety on the effectiveness of cold maceration. Richard Fennessy Research officer

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS ON FRUIT YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAWBERRIES CULTIVATED UNDER VAN ECOLOGICAL CONDITION ABSTRACT

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Blood Serum Biochemical Parameters Broiler Chicks at 29 and 49 days of age

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO MONOGRAPH ON GLUTATHIONE

QUALITY OF FRUIT JUICES

membrane technology forum Frederick Liberatore & Jamie Vinsant Minneapolis, Minnesota 3-5 June, 2015

2012 Crop CDC Meredith Malting and Brewing Trials

P. Rajendran 1 *, R. Bharathidasan 2

Oregon Wine Advisory Board Research Progress Report

The fermentation of glucose can be described by the following equation: C6H12O6 2 CH3CH2OH + 2 CO2 + energy glucose ethanol carbon dioxide.

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Alcohol management in the winery

OBTAINING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF BEERS WITH CHERRIES

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

Professional Analytical Services Catalogue

Using high pitching rate for improvement of yeast fermentation performance in high gravity brewing

Increasing Toast Character in French Oak Profiles

Harvest Series 2017: Wine Analysis. Jasha Karasek. Winemaking Specialist Enartis USA

Processing Conditions on Performance of Manually Operated Tomato Slicer

Determination of Caffeine in Coffee Products According to DIN 20481

Petite Mutations and their Impact of Beer Flavours. Maria Josey and Alex Speers ICBD, Heriot Watt University IBD Asia Pacific Meeting March 2016

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SPEED OF FERMENTATION AND LEVELS OF FLAVOUR COMPOUNDS POST- FERMENTATION

CHEMISTRY INVESTIGATORY PROJECT

The Effect of Green Tea on the Texture, Taste and Moisture of Gharidelli Double Chocolate Brownies

An Investigation of Methylsufonylmethane as a Fermentation Aid. Eryn Bottens, Jeb Z Hollabaugh, and Thomas H. Shellhammer.

FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY (DFC) NOVEMBER EXAMINATION

Institute of Brewing and Distilling

YEASTS AND NATURAL PRODUCTION OF SULPHITES

Effect of Yeast Propagation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance the new Canadian Two Row Variety Cerveza

The Effects of the Rate of Nitrogen Consumption on the Duration of Alcohol Fermentation Remain Unknown

MLF co-inoculation how it might help with white wine

BLUEBERRY MUFFIN APPLICATION RESEARCH COMPARING THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EGGS TO EGG REPLACERS IN BLUEBERRY MUFFIN FORMULATIONS RESEARCH SUMMARY

Use of Lecithin in Sweet Goods: Cookies

Acta Chimica and Pharmaceutica Indica

The sugar determination in the winemaking process

Regression Models for Saffron Yields in Iran

Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, Bulevardi Zogu I nn, 1000 Tirana, Albania

Primary Learning Outcomes: Students will be able to define the term intent to purchase evaluation and explain its use.

Physical, chemical and microbiological changes in alcoholic fermentation of sugar syrup from cassava flour

S. Kavish 1, W. S. Botheju 2, C. S. De Silva 1* 1 Department of Agricultural and Plantation Engineering, The Open. Abstract

Determination of the concentration of caffeine, theobromine, and gallic acid in commercial tea samples

Correlation of the free amino nitrogen and nitrogen by O-phthaldialdehyde methods in the assay of beer

How yeast strain selection can influence wine characteristics and flavors in Marquette, Frontenac, Frontenac gris, and La Crescent

Somchai Rice 1, Jacek A. Koziel 1, Anne Fennell 2 1

Case Study I Soy Sauce. Scenario:

5. Supporting documents to be provided by the applicant IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

MAKING WINE WITH HIGH AND LOW PH JUICE. Ethan Brown New Mexico State University 11/11/2017

CMBTC 2015 MALTING BARLEY CROP QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF SOME VOLATILE CONGENERS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF STRONG ALCOHOLIC FRUIT SPIRITS

Transcription:

The effect of Saccharomyces strain and fermentation conditions on quality prameters of non-alcoholic beer Amir Mohammad Mortazavian 1, Seyed Hadi Razavi 2,*, Seyed Mohammad Mousavi 2, Shirin Malganji 3, Sara Sohrabvandi 4,* 1 Department of Food Science and Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Food Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran. 2 Department of Food Science, Engineering & Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Iran. 3 Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Khorasgan (Isfahan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. 4 Department of Food Technnology research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Food Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. *Corresponding Author: email address: sohrabv@sbmu.ac.ir (S. Sohrabvandi) ABSTRACT In this study, the effect of several species of fermenting yeast and fermentation conditions (periodic aeration and temperature) on quality parameters of non-alcoholic beer is assessed. Yeast starters with different inoculation percent were added separately into wort with determined gravity. Wort was fermented for 48 h in different temperatures under aerobic condition or periodic aeration (every 12 h). Growth rate, wort gravity and ethanol content were analyzed for 48 hours (12-h interval). Also, 6 trained panelists were asked for sensory evaluation of final product. The highest growth rate and the highest ethanol content were found in treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation fermented at 24 C under periodic aeration and in those fermented under anaerobic conditions, respectively. The highest gravity was observed for treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration and fermentation at 4 C. The lowest growth rate and ethanol content were observed in treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml, fermented at 4 C under anaerobic condition and those fermented under periodic aeration, respectively. In treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, anaerobic condition and fermentation at 4 C, the lowest gravity was observed. In addition, among yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces rouxii showed the highest and the lowest growth rate, ethanol content and wort gravity, respectively. Additionally, treatments containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in non-alcoholic beer with more satisfactory flavor attributes. Key words: Ethanol; Non-alcoholic beer; Saccharomyces INTRODUCTION Conventional beer is a kind of malt-based beverage containing at least 3-5.5% ethanol, carbone dioxide, inorganic salts and about 800 organic compounds [1, 2]. Beer, corresponding its alcohol content, can be categorized as nonalcoholic, low-alcoholic, classical or normal, and strong. Beer is one of the most popular drinks in the world. Popularity of beer comes from its health benefits as well as its unique sensory properties. However, excessive consumption of alcoholic beer comprises some adverse effects, for instance, on pregnancy, cardiovascular patients, and athletes. Accordingly, the desire for production and consumption of non-alcoholic beer with good sensory properties is increasing [3-6]. There are several methods for production of non-alcoholic beer comprising elimination of fermentation, dilution method, restricted fermentation, and dealcoholization including vacuum distillation and dialysis. Among these methods, restricted fermentation can be conducted in both suspended batch system and immobilized system. On the other hand, applied methods in suspended batch system include reducing the ratio of fermentable extract to non-fermentable extract, glucose reduction in wort, pressurization during fermentation, use of a particular species and strains of yeasts, wort heating, cold contact/cold fermentation, high temperature mashing, maintenance of malt mash in 172 F for 30 109

minutes, and periodic aeration. Moreover, one of the methods used in restricted fermentation is applying a particular species and strains of yeasts. Some genetically modified mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lack in alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme; and therefore, they are unable to produce ethanol. However, other mutant strains of Saccharomyces are capable of producing large amounts of glycerol and sugar alcohols but they produce a minute amount of ethanol [7]. Despite the ability of Saccharomyces ludwigii in fermentation of glucose, sucrose and fructose, this yeast is not able to ferment maltose which causes beer to be sweet. Applying this yeast leads to a few amount of ethanol in beer [8, 9]. The aim of this research is to study the effect of Saccharomyces and fermentation conditions on the production of non-alcoholic Non-alcoholic beer with good sensory properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preparation of samples Yeast starters (Saccharomyces cerevisiae 70424, Saccharomyces ludwigii 3447, Saccharomyces rouxii 70535 and Saccharomyces rouxii 70531) were provided by the DSMZ Company (Braunscheig, Germany). Yeast starters with different inoculation percent (10 7 cfu/ml and 4 10 7 cfu/ml) were added separately into wort with known gravity. Wort is fermented for 48 h in different temperatures (4 C, 12 C and 24 C) under aerobic condition or periodic aeration, every 12 h. Microbiological and chemical analysis Yeast growth in wort was assessed by a spectrophotometer (Hatch, USA) during fermentation using optical density [10, 11]. ph of the samples was measured using a ph meter (Mettler, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). After cooling and degassing of samples using ultrasound probes, ethanol content and wort gravity were analyzed by a digital beer analyzer (Anton Par, Graz, Austria). Statistical analysis Experiments were performed in triplicate and the significant differences among means were analyzed using ANOVA test from Minitab software. The design was a completely randomized one. Graphs were plotted using Excel software. RESULTS Optical density Figure 1 shows the optical density representative of yeast growth rate. The highest and the lowest growth rate during fermentation were for treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration and fermentation at 24 C (FP-24), and 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, anaerobic condition and fermentation at 4 C (SN-4), respectively. Moreover, by increasing fermentation temperature, the growth rate of all treatments containing four strains of yeasts increased. The highest growth rate in yeasts was observed in h 24-48 of fermentation. Accordingly, this period showed the logarithmic phase of yeast growth. Among yeasts, S. cerevisiae showed the highest growth rate and the lowest one was for S. rouxii 70531. The maximum optical density of Saccharomyces rouxii 70531 was about one-third of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 70424. Moreover, S. rouxii 70531 has a significantly lower growth rate than strains of the same species. According to the results related to this research, treatments with periodic aeration showed a higher growth rate with a significant difference than the treatments with anaerobic condition. In anaerobic conditions, glucose resources is used to produce biomass, different organic acids and energy which is higher than alcoholic fermentation [12-14]. Moreover, the existence of aerobic condition through periodic aeration in non-alcoholic beer production significantly led to increase in yeast growth. It should be noted that, an increase in temperature resulted in further growth of yeast cells and causes unfavorable flavor [15]. The most significant effect of fermentation temperature during wort fermentation is on the yeast cell metabolism. The optimum temperature for yeast growth should not be more than 30 C and increasing the temperature has adverse effects on the growth rate. In addition, by increasing the temperature, the oxygen concentration in wort decreases, and thus, the alcoholic fermentation increases. It is worth noting that the low concentration of wort or wort index causes the high solubility of oxygen in it, and therefore, the growth rate would increase. 110

a) Saccharomyces cerevisiae 70424 b) Saccharomyces ludwigii 3447 c) Saccharomuces rouxii 70535 d) Saccharomyces rouxii 70531 Figure 1- The growth index in different situations during fermentation (variables F, S, P, N and numbers show 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration, anearobic condition and fermentation temperature, respectively) a) Saccharomyces cerevisiae 70424 b) Saccharomyces ludwigii 3447 c) Saccharomyces rouxii 70535 d) Saccharomyces rouxii 70531 Figure 2- The ethanol content in different situations during fermentation (variables F, S, P, N and numbers show 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration, anearobic condition and fermentation temperature, respectively) 111

a) Saccharomyces cerevisiae 70424 b) Saccharomyces ludwigii 3447 c) Saccharomyces rouxii 70535 d) Saccharomyces rouxii 70531 Figure 3- The wort gravity in different situations during fermentation (variables F, S, P, N and numbers show 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration, anaerobic condition and fermentation temperature, respectively) Ethanol content Figure 2 indicates the procedure of producing ethanol by yeasts. The highest ethanol content was observed for treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate in anaerobic condition and the lowest one was related to treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate in periodic aeration. S. cerevisiae 70424 showed the highest ethanol content of 1.96% V/V among treatments. The lowest ethanol content (0.04% V/V) was observed in treatments containing S. rouxii 70531 with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate, periodic aeration and fermentation at 4 C. Treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate showed higher ethanol content when compared with those with 10 7 cfu/ml, in all conditions including atmospheric condition and fermentation temperature, throughout the fermentation period. The highest ethanol content was observed in h 24 to 48 of fermentation during logarithmic phase in all treatments. Moreover, ethanol content in treatments containing S. rouxii 70531 in maximum amount was half of S. rouxii 70535 and one-tenth of S. cerevisiae 70424 and ethanol content in maximum and minimum amount was almost half in treatments with S. ludwigii when compared to those containing S. cerevisiae 70424. According to the results, in association with various yeasts, comparison of treatments in both anaerobic and periodic aeration conditions showed that type of atmospheric condition had no significant impact on ethanol content in treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate at the same fermentation temperature (ρ>0.05). Ethanol content in all treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation rate in all fermentation temperatures was significantly different. Accordingly, the significant difference in ethanol content in low temperatures was higher. According to S. cerevisiae 70424 with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, ethanol content in treatments with periodic aeration and anaerobic condition at 4 C was 0.27 and 1.52 (1.25 difference) and at 24 C was 1.09 and 1.96 (0.87 difference), respectively. This shows the importance of inoculation percent. At higher fermentation temperatures, especially in 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation and anaerobic condition, the rate of ethanol production was increased. Compared to anaerobic condition, in treatments fermented at periodic aeration, the increase in fermentation temperature had a significant 112

effect on the production of ethanol. As an example, in h 48 of fermentation, in treatments with periodic aeration (all the yeasts and 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation) the ethanol content at 12 C and 24 C was 0.53 and 1.03 (0.50 difference), respectively; and in treatments with anaerobic condition was 1.75 and 1.96 (0.21 difference), respectively. This is due to the fact that in anaerobic condition, compared to periodic aeration, the exposure time of yeast cells in anaerobic condition is short; therefore, in periodic aeration, higher fermentation temperature can lead to production of high amounts of ethanol. It should be noted that, high fermentation temperature (e.g., 12 C compared to 24 C) leads to significant decrease in solubility of oxygen in wort [15]. This causes increase of alcoholic fermentation in these temperatures. All the treatments containing S. rouxii had ethanol content below 0.5% (V/V) and, therefore, they were suitable for production of non-alcoholic beer. For S. cerevisiae 70424 and S. ludwigii 3447, except those with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation in anaerobic condition (in all fermentation temperatures) and treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml, periodic aeration and fermentation at 24 C, the ethanol content in other treatments was below 0.5% (V/V). Wort gravity Figure 3 shows the wort gravity of four strains of yeasts in treatments. The lowest wort gravity was related to the treatment with 4 10 7 cfu/ml, anaerobic condition and fermentation at 24 C (FN-24). The highest was observed in treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation and produced under periodic aeration. Furthermore, treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation and anaerobic condition showed lower wort gravity than treatments produced under periodic aeration. Treatments with S. cerevisiae 70424 and S. rouxii 70531 showed the highest and lowest wort gravity, respectively. Results indicated that wort gravity had a direct correlation with fermentable sugars and on the contrary, a reverse effect on ethanol content [16]. Thus, the treatments produced in anaerobic condition, especially with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, had higher amounts of ethanol compared to those produced in periodic aeration and they showed lower wort gravity. Wort gravity in similar treatments (all variables except fermentation temperature) fermented at 24 C was lower than the two other fermentation temperatures. This implies more consumption of sugars in anaerobic and aerobic condition and more production of ethanol in anaerobic condition. Sensory evaluation Two treatments containing S. cerevisiae with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration and fermentation at 12 C (FP-12), and 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, anaerobic condition and fermentation at 24 C (SN-24) showed more satisfactory flavor attributes and overall acceptability. As a result, alcoholic fermentation is more complete in these treatments than the others. Although the ethanol content in both treatments did not exceed 0.5% (V/V). Higher fermentation temperature and oxygen existence caused an inappropriate flavor profile. In addition, all the treatments containing S. cerevisiae showed mild worty off-flavor [15]. S. rouxii compared with other two yeasts, showed less overall acceptability due to low growth rate and fermentation properties. All the treatments containing S. ludwigii showed less maturity in flavor and overall acceptability when compared with those containing S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, S. ludwigii-containing treatments in higher fermentation temperature (24 C) exhibited lactic sour attributes due to production of lactic acid [17] and in lower fermentation temperatures (4 C and 12 C) showed inappropriate sweet and immature flavor. This can be attributed to the inability of this yeast in fermentation of maltose in wort [18]. CONCLUSION This study was undertaken to investigate the suitability of the limited fermentation procedure for producing non-alcoholic beer. Wort with defined gravity was fermented by four strains of yeasts for 48 h in different temperatures under aerobic condition and periodic aeration. Growth rate, wort gravity and ethanol content were analyzed during 48 h of fermentation. Treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, fermented at 24 C under periodic aeration and those under anaerobic condition showed highest growth rate and ethanol content, respectively. The highest gravity was observed for treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration and fermentation at 4 C. Accordingly, treatments with 10 7 cfu/ml, fermented at 4 C under anaerobic condition and those at periodic aeration showed the lowest 113

growth rate and ethanol content, respectively. Moreover, the lowest wort gravity was for treatments with 4 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, fermented at 4 C and under anaerobic condition. Since the non-alcoholic beer produced by limited fermentation (with S. cerevisiae) showed superior taste characteristics, the use of this yeast with REFERNCES 1.Fillaudeau L, Boissier B, Moreau A, Blanpainavet P, Ermolaev S, Jitariouk N, Gourdon A. Investigation of rotating and vibrating filtration for clarification of rough beer. J FOOD ENG 2007; 80(1): 206-217. 2.Moll MM. Water. In: Hardwick WA, editor. Handbook of Brewing. New York: Marcel Dekker 1995; pp. 133-156. 3.Gorinstein S Caspi A, Zemser M, Tarkthenberg S. Comprative content of some phenolics in beer, red and white wines. NUTR RES 2000; 20(1): 131-139. 4.Nardini M, Ghiselli A. Determination of free and bound phenolic acids in beer. FOOD CHEM 2004; 84: 137-143. 5.Ghiselli A, Natella F, Guidi A, Montanari L, Fantozzi P, Scaccini C. Beer increases plasma antioxidant capacity in humans. J NUTR BIOCHEM 2000; 11(2): 76-80. 6.Lapcik O, Hill M, Hampl R, Wahala K, Adlercreutz H. Identification of isoflavonoids in beer. STEROIDS 1998; 63(1): 14-20. 7.Huige, N.J, Sanchez G.W, Leidig A.R. Process for preparing a nonalcoholic (less the 0.5 volume percent alcohol) malt beverage. US PATENT No. 4,970,082. 1990. 8.Vanbeneden N, Delvaux F, Delvaux F.R. Determination of hydroxycinnamic acids and volatile phenols in wort and beer by isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography using electrochemical detection. J of Chromatographia 2006; 1136(2): 237-242. 9.Buzrul S. A suitable model of microbial survival curves for beer pasteurization. LWTfOOD SCI TECHNOL 2007; 40(8): 1330-1336. fermentation condition of 10 7 cfu/ml inoculation, periodic aeration and 4 C (amount of ethanol is less than 0.05%) is recommended. It is worth mentioning that combination of different fragrances can be used for covering the wort-like off flavor caused by S. rouxii and S. ludwigii for the production of non-alcoholic beer with good sensory properties. 10.Van-Iersel M.F.M, Van Dieren B, Rombouts F.M, Abee T. Flavor formation and cell physiology during the production of alcohol-free beer with immobilized Saccharomycess cerevisiae. ENZYM MICROBIOL TECH 1999; 24(7): 407-411. 11. Institute of standards and Industrial Research of Iran, Sensory analysis methodology evalution of food products by netods using scales. ISIRI no 3443. 12.Hardwick WA. An overview of beer making. In: Hardwick WA, editor. Handbook of brewing. New York: Marcel Dekker 1995; pp. 87-96. 13.Yuan C, Blok K. Conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid. J of Biol and Chem 1961; 236(5): 1277. 14.Bloomfield D.K, Bloch K. The formation of 9 -unsaturated fatty acids. J BIOL CHEM 1960; 235: 337-341. 15.Briggs D.E, Boulton C.A, Brookes P.A, Stevens R. Metabolism of wort by yeast. BREW SCI PRACTICE 2004; 87-92. 16.Ogbonna A.C, Obasi C.N. A qualitative assessment of some Nigerian larger beer brands. NIGERIAN FOOD J 1995; 13: 49-53 17.Dziondziak K. Method for the production of low-alcohol or alcohol-free beer. US PATENT No. 4,814,188. 1989. 18.Huige N.J, Sanchez G.W, Leidig A.R. Process for preparing a nonalcoholic (less the 0.5 volume percent alcohol) malt beverage. US PATENT No. 4,970,082. 1990. 114