Title: Chemical and physical properties of Pinyon Pine and Juniper from Lincoln County, NV Date: June 2016 Company: Lincoln County Regional

Similar documents
Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

2015 Hard Red Wheat / Hard White Wheat. Crop Quality Report

Gray Flycatcher Empidonax wrightii

Development of Value Added Products From Home-Grown Lychee

Encapsulated Flavours New Horizons for the Delivery of Aroma and Taste Flander s Food Technology Day, Brussels, September 29-30, 2010

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

2016 Hard Red Wheat / Hard White Wheat. Crop Quality Report

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

NEW PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF HIGH PURITY ADN - DEVELOPMENT AND SCALE-UP. Henrik SKIFS, Helen STENMARK Eurenco Bofors AB Peter THORMÄHLEN ECAPS AB

Arizona / California Combined Crop Analysis Desert Durum Crop Quality Report

SNAP-ON AND STRAP-ON PIPE MARKERS

Certificate of Analysis

Use of a Master Lexicon for Evaluation of Spirit Categories

Certificate of Analysis

Stand structure and aridity alter tree mortality risk in Nevada s PJ woodlands

Tree Rings and Water Resource Management in the Southwest

2017 Hard Red Wheat / Hard White Wheat. Crop Quality Report

Acetic Acid. Table of Contents

STANDARD FOR BLACK, WHITE AND GREEN PEPPERS CXS Adopted in 2017.

FINISHED FOOD SPECIFICATION SHEET

FINISHED FOOD SPECIFICATION SHEET

Smoke Taint Update. Thomas Collins, PhD Washington State University

Certificate of Analysis

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Hard Red Wheat 2010 Hard White Wheat 2010

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 236 CHEMICALS FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCES (March 2001)

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

2018 Hard Red Wheat / Hard White Wheat. Crop Quality Report

Smoke Taint: Effect of wildfires on fruit and wine composition

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION

Evaluation of Soxtec System Operating Conditions for Surface Lipid Extraction from Rice

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Enology

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

Acetic Acid. Table of Contents

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Elemental Analysis of Yixing Tea Pots by Laser Excited Atomic. Fluorescence of Desorbed Plumes (PLEAF) Bruno Y. Cai * and N.H. Cheung Dec.

Test sheet preparation of pulps and filtrates from deinking processes

Definition of Honey and Honey Products

Beth LaShell Fort Lewis College The Old Fort at Hesperus Amber Beye Program Assistant. Dr. Kevin Lombard and Jason Thomas New Mexico State University

*Level IV report narratives are more detailed than other levels.

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

P.R. Fresquez.

GROUND CUMIN STD SPECIFICATION.

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

James A. Harter Senior Consultant for LexTech, Inc. Effect of Grain Orientation on Round Robin Life Predictions

FINISHED FOOD SPECIFICATION SHEET

2017 U.S. Pulse Quality Survey

Name Date. Materials 1. Calculator 2. Colored pencils (optional) 3. Graph paper (optional) 4. Microsoft Excel (optional)

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that the following products, listed under their respective brand names, prepared by

2014 Organic Silage Corn Variety Trial for Coastal Humboldt County

Project Title: Testing biomarker-based tools for scald risk assessment during storage. PI: David Rudell Co-PI (2): James Mattheis

Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Page

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IN WINES BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Analytical Method for Coumaphos (Targeted to agricultural, animal and fishery products)

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR WHOLE DRY PEAS¹

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

Quality of western Canadian lentils 2012

GLOSSARY Last Updated: 10/17/ KL. Terms and Definitions

AST Live November 2016 Roasting Module. Presenter: John Thompson Coffee Nexus Ltd, Scotland

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

SPICE UP THE FIRE! Wood-Fired Cooking

The Science of Mashing. Jamie Ramshaw M Brew IBD 25/10/17

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

TEST SUMMARY HIGH SPEED DOCKING CONNECTOR. Table of Contents

Recent Developments in Rheological Instruments

Evaluation of quality characteristics of soy based millet biscuits

Pinyon-Juniper. Conservation Profile 3,695,000 ha [9,130,000 acres] 13% of state. Key Bird-Habitat Attributes. Hab-16-1

Research Proposal: Viticultural Terroir in Ashtabula County, Ohio

Briquetting Conditions for Australian Hematite-Goethite Iron Ore Fines

Product Code: CP50OR RUBBED AND DRIED OREGANO SPECIFICATION.

Custom Barrel Profiling

FP2107 CROP PROCESS ENGINEERING

Road Construction on Sabkha Soils

Draft Indian Standard SPICES AND CONDIMENTS - CORIANDER, WHOLE AND GROUND - SPECIFICATION (Third Revision)

Mills Rim Restoration and Fuelwood Proposed Action

Professional Analytical Services Catalogue

Survey Overview. SRW States and Areas Surveyed. U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas. East Coast States. Gulf Port States

WHEAT FLOUR OCEANIA IMPEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. Oceania Impex Australia Pty Ltd

AAFCO Meeting August, Moisture Best Practices By Dr. Jane Caldwell Assistant Technical Director Midwest Laboratories

Comparison of Two Commercial Modified Atmosphere Box-liners for Sweet Cherries.

18 PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND CARBOHYDRATE PARTITIONING IN CRANBERRY

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch

Animal Science Department, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Louisiana Crawfish Action Plan

A New Approach for Smoothing Soil Grain Size Curve Determined by Hydrometer

Panel 1 Off-Flavor Identification

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

SUNFLOWER OIL & MEAL. WORLDWIDE SOFT COMMERCIAL OFFER. Montreux, Switzerland,

Transcription:

Title: Chemical and physical properties of Pinyon Pine and Juniper from Lincoln County, NV Date: Company: Lincoln County Regional Development Authority Contact: Mike Baughman, Executive Director Funding: Idaho National Laboratory Technical Assistance Program #530136YQ7, Rural Business Development Grant from USDA to the Lincoln County Regional Development Authority Report Prepared by: Amber Hoover, amber.hoover@inl.gov, 208-526-5992 1. Project Summary There has been extensive expansion of pinyon pine and juniper into the sagebrush ecosystem in the Great Basin over the last century (DOI-BLM, 2013). This encroachment is a source of concern because of loss of the amount and quality of habitat for wildlife, risk for large and high intensity wildfires, and alterations to hydrologic and riparian functions (DOI-BLM, 2013). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing to thin more than 700,000 acres of pinyon pine and juniper woodlands in Lincoln County, Nevada over the next 20 years. Lincoln County Regional Development Authority (LCRDA) is actively working to attract industries that might use these woody resources as a biomass feedstock; however, quality information currently does not exist for pinyon pine or juniper growing in Lincoln County. It is of interest to understand the quality attributes of trees harvested from different stages of pinyon-juniper encroachment, so that the biomass can be mapped to appropriate conversion or other end use processes. There are three stages of pinyon-juniper encroachment; in Phase I trees are present, in Phase II trees are co-dominant, and in Phase III trees are dominant (DOI-BLM, 2013). The scope of this project focused on pinyon pine and juniper growing in Phase II and III stands in Lincoln County, Nevada. The specific objective was to analyze the chemical and physical characteristics of pinyon pine and juniper from Phase II and a Phase III sites and determine the variability between the different woody materials. The Biomass Feedstock National User Facility at Idaho National Laboratory completed chemical composition, elemental speciation of ash, fuel properties, and particle characterization on pinyon pine and juniper samples from a Phase II and a Phase III site that were provided by LCRDA. Results were presented by the Lincoln County Regional Development Authority at the International Biomass Conference and Expo on April 11-14, 2016, and are available to the public in the Bioenergy Feedstock Library (bioenergylibrary.inl.gov). Ultimately the analytical results will be used by the LCRDA to market these woody resources to potential bioenergy and biopower feedstock users. 2. Biomass Characterization Methods 2.1. Biomass Pinyon pine and juniper samples were harvested using a chainsaw from BLM land on the west side of Panaca Summit off of Nevada State Route 319 in January of 2016. The samples were chipped using a 30.00 Commercial DR Rapid-Feed Chipper. The samples were further milled to pass through a ¼-inch sieve using a Schutte Buffalo Hammermill. The samples were then dried at 40 C for 48 hours to reduce the moisture for storage, and then analyzed for particle characteristics. Samples were milled to pass through a

Page 2 2-mm sieve using a Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill for composition and elemental ash. The samples were ground to 0.2mm using a Retsch ZM200 for fuel properties. 2.2. Fuel Properties Samples were analyzed for moisture, volatiles, fixed carbon and ash using a LECO Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA) 701 (St. Joseph, MI, USA) following ASTM D 5142-09. Ultimate analysis (C,H,N) was performed with a LECO TruSpec CHN Analyzer following a modified ASTM D 5373-10 method (Flour and Plant Tissue Method) that uses a slightly different burn profile. Elemental sulfur content was determined using ASTM D4239-10. Oxygen content was determined by subtracting percent carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and sulfur from 100 percent. Calorimetry (high heating and low heating value) was done with a calorimeter using ASTM D5865-10. 2.3. Chemical Composition Chemical composition was completed using NREL laboratory analytical procedures (Sluiter et al., 2010). 2.4. Elemental Ash The elemental composition of ash was determined as described in ASTM standards D3174, D3682 and D6349. 2.5. Particle Characteristics A digital image processing system (CAMSIZER, Horiba Instruments Inc.) equipped with two digital cameras was used to determine particle morphology for triplicate samples ground to ¼ inch. Particle size distributions, particle diameter for the 16 th, 50 th, and 84 th percentiles (d16, d50, d84), and the 16%, 50%, and 84% theoretical cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (t16, t50, and t84; Westover et al., 2013) were calculated for xc min (width; particle diameter that is the shortest chord of a set of measured maximum chords of a particle projection) and xfe max (length; particle diameter that is the longest Feret diameter for a set of measured Feret diameters of a particle). The cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (e.g., t16) were calculated by interpolation and represent theoretical sieve sizes that would retain 16, 50 or 84% of the particles by mass. 3. Results 3.1. Fuel Properties Table 1. Proximate, ultimate, and calorific values for phase II pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 08a5c880-4853-48e8-bea6-26f37b55e1ba; reported on a dry basis) %Volatile Proximate Ultimate Calorimetry %Ash %Fixed Carbon %Hydrogen %Carbon %Nitrogen %Oxygen %Sulfur HHV LHV 79.26 1.90 18.84 6.28 52.49 0.58 38.70 0.04 9268 7819

Page 3 Table 2. Proximate, ultimate, and calorific values for phase III pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 55341a91-8891-43dd-bf8b-729e2b92ec6d; reported on a dry basis) %Volatile Proximate Ultimate Calorimetry %Ash %Fixed Carbon %Hydrogen %Carbon %Nitrogen %Oxygen %Sulfur HHV LHV 79.64 1.85 18.52 6.27 52.70 0.52 38.63 0.04 9355 7901 Table 3. Proximate, ultimate, and calorific values for phase II juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 031c749d-b618-43c3-bd9a-2fb52d2aac89; reported on a dry basis) %Volatile Proximate Ultimate Calorimetry %Ash %Fixed Carbon %Hydrogen %Carbon %Nitrogen %Oxygen %Sulfur HHV LHV 79.70 2.89 17.41 6.30 53.12 0.60 37.04 0.05 9517 8068 Table 4. Proximate, ultimate, and calorific values for phase III juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 00af89ac-084c-4f74-8d40-1202f6c0d352; reported on a dry basis) %Volatile Proximate Ultimate Calorimetry %Ash %Fixed Carbon %Hydrogen %Carbon %Nitrogen %Oxygen %Sulfur HHV LHV 78.04 2.85 19.11 6.07 52.05 0.51 38.47 0.05 9129 7720

Page 4 3.2. Chemical Composition Table 5. Chemical composition of phase II pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 2FD580CA- A85B-BB41-AF49-2AF1F4F92E03) %Structural Ash Inorganics %Structural %Water Extractives Others 1.48 0.95 1.94 0.34 11.02 %EtOH Extractives %Lignin %Glucan %Xylan %Galactan 9.60 31.66 22.57 5.38 3.62 %Arabinan + Mannan %Acetate %Total 9.12 0.61 98.28 Table 6. Chemical composition of phase III pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 5092A3E1- F73B-F24B-B6D8-FE84B35A25FB) %Structural Ash Inorganics %Structural %Water Extractives Others 1.40 1.00 1.86 0.52 11.72 %EtOH Extractives %Lignin %Glucan %Xylan %Galactan 10.53 29.95 22.03 5.22 3.59 %Arabinan + Mannan %Acetate %Total 10.13 0.79 98.73

Page 5 Table 7. Chemical composition of phase II juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 2D4191C1-2483- 7543-826A-7171833AE6F6) %Structural Ash Inorganics %Structural %Water Extractives Others 3.11 0.81 2.28 0.37 11.72 %EtOH Extractives %Lignin %Glucan %Xylan %Galactan 11.53 30.98 20.11 5.37 3.47 %Arabinan + Mannan %Acetate %Total 6.55 0.85 97.14 Table 8. Chemical composition of phase III juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: E04E08C7-3B7A-5C47-AD20-0C9A6EF8328C) %Structural Ash Inorganics %Structural %Water Extractives Others 3.37 1.16 1.86 0.37 9.30 %EtOH Extractives %Lignin %Glucan %Xylan %Galactan 6.63 35.13 22.94 5.65 3.72 %Arabinan + Mannan %Acetate %Total 6.84 0.98 97.93 3.3. Elemental Ash Table 9. Elemental ash composition a of phase II pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 2fd580ca-a85b-bb41-af49-2af1f4f92e03) %Al as Al2O3 %Ca as CaO %Fe as Fe2O3 %K as K2O %Mg as MgO %Mn as MnO %Na as Na2O %P as P2O5 %Si as SiO2 %Ti as TiO2 %S as SO3 1.61 46.05 1.09 19.64 9.59 0.21 0.22 7.75 6.28 0.08 4.21 a Total ash was 2.00% (held at 750 C for 8 hours).

Page 6 Table 10. Elemental ash composition a of phase III pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 5092a3e1-f73b-f24b-b6d8-fe84b35a25fb) %Al as Al2O3 %Ca as CaO %Fe as Fe2O3 %K as K2O %Mg as MgO %Mn as MnO %Na as Na2O %P as P2O5 %Si as SiO2 %Ti as TiO2 %S as SO3 1.49 44.63 1.20 20.12 8.06 0.17 0.30 7.20 5.74 0.08 4.48 a Total ash was 1.89% (held at 750 C for 8 hours). Table 11. Elemental ash composition a of phase II juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 2d4191c1-2483-7543-826a-7171833ae6f6) %Al as Al2O3 %Ca as CaO %Fe as Fe2O3 %K as K2O %Mg as MgO %Mn as MnO %Na as Na2O %P as P2O5 %Si as SiO2 %Ti as TiO2 %S as SO3 1.46 58.55 0.63 11.00 5.85 0.07 0.27 4.93 7.11 0.08 3.96 a Total ash was 3.06% (held at 750 C for 8 hours). Table 12. Elemental ash composition a of phase III juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: e04e08c7-3b7a-5c47-ad20-0c9a6ef8328c) %Al as Al2O3 %Ca as CaO %Fe as Fe2O3 %K as K2O %Mg as MgO %Mn as MnO %Na as Na2O %P as P2O5 %Si as SiO2 %Ti as TiO2 %S as SO3 1.33 63.50 0.63 10.77 4.33 0.10 0.24 4.28 6.21 0.07 3.79 a Total ash was 3.18% (held at 750 C for 8 hours). 3.4. Particle Characteristics Table 13. A digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ) was used to determine particle morphology for 1/4-inch phase II pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: ed191925-0666-dc4d-b736-638350560be3). Particle diameter for the 16 th, 50 th, and 84 th percentiles (d16, d50, d84) and the 16%, 50%, and 84% theoretical cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (t16, t50, and t84) were calculated for xc min (width) and xfe max (length). Width Length d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 0.39 1.04 2.28 0.33 0.91 2.02 0.72 2.37 5.69 0.63 2.08 5.34

Page 7 Table 14. A digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ) was used to determine particle morphology for 1/4-inch phase III pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: fab4d633-2dc3-da4f-89a9-958e3e7ce597). Particle diameter for the 16 th, 50 th, and 84 th percentiles (d16, d50, d84) and the 16%, 50%, and 84% theoretical cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (t16, t50, and t84) were calculated for xc min (width) and xfe max (length). Width Length d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 0.41 1.05 2.18 0.34 0.87 1.86 0.77 2.33 5.00 0.66 2.00 4.26 Table 15. A digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ) was used to determine particle morphology for 1/4-inch phase II juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 13953d73-b1e0- ac4f-8b56-0ec8b541f0ce). Particle diameter for the 16 th, 50 th, and 84 th percentiles (d16, d50, d84) and the 16%, 50%, and 84% theoretical cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (t16, t50, and t84) were calculated for xc min (width) and xfe max (length). Width Length d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 0.41 0.98 1.82 0.35 0.83 1.54 0.40 0.81 1.43 0.33 0.68 1.21 Table 16. A digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ) was used to determine particle morphology for 1/4-inch phase III juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 07bf40b6-72b9- b441-aa55-2b2933201f91). Particle diameter for the 16 th, 50 th, and 84 th percentiles (d16, d50, d84) and the 16%, 50%, and 84% theoretical cumulative passing percentile sieve sizes (t16, t50, and t84) were calculated for xc min (width) and xfe max (length). Width Length d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 d16 d50 d84 t16 t50 t84 0.38 0.92 1.71 0.32 0.78 1.41 0.70 1.82 4.22 0.59 1.52 3.56

Page 8 Figure 1. Cumulative passing percent of 1/4-inch phase II pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: ed191925-0666-dc4d-b736-638350560be3) determined using a digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ). Figure 2. Cumulative passing percent of 1/4-inch phase III pinyon pine (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: fab4d633-2dc3-da4f-89a9-958e3e7ce597) determined using a digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ).

Page 9 Figure 3. Cumulative passing percent of 1/4-inch phase II juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 13953d73-b1e0-ac4f-8b56-0ec8b541f0ce) determined using a digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ). Figure 4. Cumulative passing percent of 1/4-inch phase III juniper (Bioenergy Feedstock Library GUID: 07bf40b6-72b9-b441-aa55-2b2933201f91) determined using a digital image processing system (CAMSIZER ).

Page 10 References Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Environmental Assessment, DOI-BLM-NV- B010-2013-0020-EA, Toiyabe West Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project, November, 2013. Sluiter JB, Ruiz RO, Scarlata CJ, Sluiter AD, Templeton DW. Compositional Analysis of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. 1. Review and Description of Methods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010;58:9043. Westover TL, Phanphanich M, Clark ML, Rowe SR, Egan SE, Zacher AH, et al. Impact of thermal pretreatment on the fast pyrolysis conversion of southern pine. Biofuels 2013;4:45.