THE POTENTIAL FOR TEFF AS AN ALTERNATIVE FORAGE CROP FOR IRRIGATED REGIONS. Jay Davisonˡ, Mike Laca², Earl Creech³ ABSTRACT

Similar documents
The Potential for Teff as an Alternative Forage Crop for Irrigated Regions

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

Legume and Cool-Season Grass Mixtures: A Demonstration Planting in Perkins County, South Dakota

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Pasture Development Spring Pasture Development

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Forage Systems to Increase Productivity

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Forage Planting Alternatives Mike Ballweg, Crops & Soils Agent, Sheboygan County

Cool-Season Annual Forages for Hay in North Dakota

MICRONUTRIENT MAPPING IN IDAHO, WASHINGTON AND OREGONll

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Vintage 2006: Umpqua Valley Reference Vineyard Report

2011 Summer Annual Grass Report

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

2012 Estimated Acres Producers Estimated Production Units Estimated Farm Value Farm Crawfish 182,167 1,251 90,973,725 Lbs.

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

EXPERIMENTS WITH REDUCED LIGNIN ALFALFA

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

1. Planting tips for wheat planted after row crop harvest 1 2. Sunflower preharvest treatments 2 3. Fertilizer management for cool-season pastures 3

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Growing Quinoa in the Willamette Valley. Heather Stoven OSU Extension Horticulture

SUPPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS FOR THE COW-CALF HERD

Considerations in Selecting a Summer Annual Variety

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Refer to the nutrition label for peanut butter below and answer the following questions.

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Forage For Stockmen Buffalo Brand Seed Co. - Where Yield & Palatability Meet

Warm-Season Annual Grasses for Summer Forage

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

Determining the Optimum Time to Pick Gwen

GLOSSARY Last Updated: 10/17/ KL. Terms and Definitions

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

EXTENSION BULLETIN 134. /'vl!v ). FOR MINNESOTA M. L. ARMOUR J. W. LAMBERT

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

Varieties and Rootstocks in Texas

Response of Camelina Varieties to NaCl Salinity

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Cultivation Pattern:

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDISATION OF FORMULATED BAKED PRODUCTS USING MILLETS

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Dairy Market. November 2017

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

1

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Faba Bean. Uses of Faba Bean

Kevin Long Craig County OSU Extension Educator AG/4-H Youth Development

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Dairy Outlook. December By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Seeding and Reseeding of Cool-Season Forages in North Florida. G. M. Prine 1. Introduction

Klamath Experiment Station

Forage Field Guide Second Edition

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

2013 Vintage Weather Summary for Two Blondes Vineyard

The Three Sisters. Curriculum Unit Presented by Virginia AITC

Overseeding Rhizoma Perennial Peanut Pasture and Hay Fields during the Cool Season 1

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

(EXAMPLE OF PROCEEDING PAPER) COOL-SEASON MANAGEMENT AFFECTS SUBSEQUENT PERFORMANCE OF TIFTON 85 BERMUDAGRASS

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

The University of Georgia

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Nutrient uptake, N fixation and release from soybean pea and lentil in Saskatchewan soils. Jing Xie, Jeff Schoenau, Tom Warkentin

Harvest Aids in Soybeans - Application Timing and Value. J.L. Griffin, C.A. Jones, L.M. Etheredge, Jr., J. Boudreaux, and D.Y.

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Warm-Season Forages for Ohio

Transcription:

THE POTENTIAL FOR TEFF AS AN ALTERNATIVE FORAGE CROP FOR IRRIGATED REGIONS Jay Davisonˡ, Mike Laca², Earl Creech³ ABSTRACT Teff is a warm season, annual grass that originated in Ethiopia and was imported to the United States more than 25 years ago. It is not cold tolerant and must be planted after the last frost of the year. Teff hay is reported to be a highly palatable, nutritious forage and is especially popular with horse owners. Interest in growing teff as an alternative forage has increased dramatically as more hay producers are introduced to it in seed company brochures, Extension fact sheets, and popular agricultural publications. As demand for teff hay has increased, prices have grown accordingly. Teff has been formally evaluated by forage researchers in several Western states. The results of these experiments reveal that teff yields are highly variable and affected by irrigation levels, fertilizer applications and variety tested. However, most of the results indicate that teff grown under an adequate irrigation and fertility program can produce in excess of five tons per acre. Teff is currently grown on a commercial scale on limited acreage throughout the West. The experience of commercial growers correlates to that found by researchers with teff production levels of approximately five tons per acre when grown under adequate levels of irrigation, fertility and utilizing proper harvest management techniques. Yield and quality of teff are highest under multi-cut systems. Teff requires approximately 50 days between harvests and regrowth is severely reduced when teff is cut to a stubble height of less than three inches. Total nitrogen applications in excess of 100 pounds per acre seldom increase economical yields of teff hay. Fertilizer applied prior to and between harvests normally results in superior yields. A combination of research results and practical experience leads to the conclusion that teff is a viable alternative forage crop when produced under irrigated conditions in the warmer parts of the West. Key Words: Teff hay, alternative forages, production practices Introduction Teff Eragrostis tef is a warm season, annual grass, originally imported from Ethiopia. It is an annual lovegrass species and other names for it include; tef, annual love grass, teff grass and summer annual grass. It is reported to be drought tolerant and grow on a wide variety of soils which is not surprising considering that there are nearly 4000 varieties identified worldwide. Teff is frost sensitive and will die if exposed to temperatures below 28 F. However, teff grows rapidly when days are hot and nights are warm. ˡJ. Davison (davisonj@unce.unr.edu), UNCE Crop Specialist, 111 Sheckler Rd. Fallon, NV 89406 ;² M.Laca (mikelaca@live.com) Graduate Student Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan UT 84322; ³E Creech (earl.creech@usu.edu) Extension Agronomist, Utah State University.4820 Old Main Hill, Logan UT 84322. In: Proceedings, 2011 Western Alfalfa & Forage Conference, Las Vegas, NV 11-13 December, 2011. UC Cooperative Extension, Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. (See http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu for this and other symposium proceedings.)

Teff produces nutritious, fine stemmed, palatable hay in a relatively short time period (40-60 days) during the summer months. It can be cut multiple times when the season is long enough and adequate water is available for regrowth. When managed properly, the nutrient content and digestibility can equal or exceed other cool season grass hays commonly used as grass Teff hay is rapidly gaining favor with horse owners because of its high palatability and in part, due to its perceived low levels of nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC). The high level of interest and inquires has resulted in the establishment of several experiments throughout the western United States with the purpose of evaluating teff as a forage ( Davison, 2006, 2009, Noreberg, et al. 2009). Numerous varieties of teff have been tested for yields, nutrient levels, response to, fertilizer, and irrigation levels and damage from herbicide applications (Davison, et al. 2010, Roseberg et al. 2006. In addition, agronomic information necessary for the successful production of teff has also been developed (Miller, 2010). All of this information is critical when a producer is trying to decide if teff hay is a viable choice for an alternative forage crop in the western United States. Why Teff? Although teff has been produced as hay commercially for over 20 years, interest in teff has grown dramatically during the past five. Teff hay production is now a regular feature story in the popular press and demand for teff hay continues to increase, especially among horse owners. A Google search for teff hay for horses indicates the level of interest in teff with pages of articles related to teff and even more questions being posed on chat rooms, blogs etc. In Nevada, the interest has resulted in an increasing demand and increasing prices since 2005 (Figure 1). Numerous studies have evaluated teff hay yields in several states over a nearly 20 year period. (Table 1). In Nevada, a study comparing 15 different teff varieties not selected specifically for forage production found large differences in yields (Table 2) while work in Oregon found little difference between named forage varieties. This illustrates the importance of selecting varieties developed specifically for forage production. The results of experimental work and commercial production indicates that a reliable long term average production is somewhere between 5 and 6 tons/acre per season. Teff hay quality has also been evaluated by researchers and found to be comparable to cool season grass hay (Miller 2010, Staniar et al. 2010) (Table 3). Alfalfa, Medicago sativa, is the dominant forage crop of the western United States. Fields producing alfalfa must be rotated periodically to other crops such as cool season annual grains which are harvested for hay. Historically the profit potential in small grain hay harvested as a rotation crop is small and many producers are searching for alternatives that can be produced using their normal haying equipment. In the right locations teff may fulfill this need as a higher value rotation crop to alfalfa. Teff has also been used as a double crop following winter annual cereal hay production. The winter annual grain is planted in September, harvested in early June followed by teff which is planted in mid to late June. While teff is reported to be drought tolerant recent studies indicate that adequate irrigation is necessary for optimum production (Roseberg et al. 2006). The primary water savings possible with teff production is related to the relatively short growing season as compared to alfalfa and

fewer irrigations. A single cutting of teff is possible in as little as 40 days. Because it is a warm season, annual grass, teff is not planted until after the last frost and irrigation normally ceases well before the first frost. Research in Oregon indicates that irrigation requirements for teff range from 4-10 per cutting. Additional research results in Nevada and California recommend a minimum of 24 per season. Is Teff Right For My Operation? While teff can be an excellent alternative forage crop for many producers it must be planted where it can thrive. The primary consideration is climate. Teff is a warm season crop and will produce poorly when summer temperatures are too cool or where late frosts are common. In Nevada, teff grows very well in portions of the state that experience at least 3000 growing degree days (50 F base) per year and is marginal when the growing degree days drop below 2300 per year. Higher elevations that experience cool nights will also slow the growth of teff. As stated previously, teff requires adequate irrigation and fertility for optimal production. Teff grows slowly for the first 2-3 weeks and recommended irrigations are light and frequent at this time. Once the roots are established teff is irrigated as any other grass crop. Teff nitrogen requirements are relatively small but applications up to approximately 120 pounds per acre per season of actual nitrogen are recommended. Teff is harvested similarly to other grass hays and normal haying equipment is adequate to harvest teff. It can normally be cut two to three times per season depending on the length of the frost free period. Because teff is still unknown to many consumers it often requires additional marketing efforts as compared to known forages. While palatability is high many horse owners report that their animals must learn to eat teff with acceptance very high after the horses become accustomed to eating it. Recommended Teff Production Practices If a producer decides to plant teff as an alternative forage source, several agronomic practices have proven beneficial across a wide spectrum of situations. As with any crop, success depends on matching the growth requirements of teff with the agronomic practices applied. While teff will grow in many soil types including poor soils, it produces best in high quality soils that exhibit little problems such as high salts, or alkalinity. Teff seed is extremely small with approximately 1.25 million per pound. As such, it must be planted in a firm, fine, seed bed to avoid placing the seed too deep. Seed should not be placed deeper than ¼ of an inch and should be rolled after planting. A typical grain drill is inadequate for seeding teff properly. Brillion or air type seeders are preferred planters for teff. Rolling the field with a cultipacker has also been shown to be beneficial following the seeding operation. Raw seed should be planted at five to six pounds per acre. Coated seeds are normally planted at a rate double that of raw seed. Some producers report that coated seed is easier to plant due to the larger size and rates used. Currently

no herbicides are registered for use on teff. Therefore planting into a clean seedbed is strongly recommended. It is expected that two common broadleaved herbicides will be available for use in the near future. Teff should not be planted until after the last frost date of the season. Soil temperatures of at least 60 F at seeding increase the germination and initial plant growth rates. Irrigation is normally required frequently following seeding and until the roots are established at two to three weeks. Once established, teff is typically irrigated in the same way as other grass crops. Assuming that levels of other soil nutrients are not lacking, teff responds well to 50-60 pounds of actual nitrogen applied at seeding and after each cut. Nitrogen levels in excess of this amount have not proven to be economical and can cause lodging. Teff is normally harvested when it is in the early boot stage. Cutting at this time has proven to balance nutrients and yields while avoiding excess lodging. Teff should be cut no shorter than three to four inches. Cutting teff plants shorter than three inches will reduce the rate of regrowth and may kill many of the teff plants. Practices that speeds drying after harvest are also beneficial as teff plants growing under the windrow are normally much slower to regrow than those growing in the open. A second cutting of teff can be expected approximately 50 days following the first. Total yields on two cuttings should be approximately five to six tons. Conclusions Teff forage production under irrigated conditions has been shown to be a feasible and often desirable alternative to conventional cool season grass and alfalfa hay production operations in the West. It is rapidly gaining acceptance as a premium feed source, especially for horse owners who desire low NSC forages for horses that are overweight or suffer from forage related metabolic disorders. This rising demand has resulted in higher prices for teff hay than other cool season crops typically rotated with alfalfa. Teff hay also fills a niche for producers needing a summer annual crop that can be produced in short water years and in a relatively short time frame. It can be produced using standard haying equipment and when proper agronomic practices are applied will produce yields equal to or greater than other cool season grass hays. Literature Cited Davison, J. 2007. Observations of commercial tef production in Nevada during 2006. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension fact sheet 07-29. http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/ag/2007/fs0729.pdf Davison, J. Creech, E., and Laca, M. 2010. Response of teff biomass yields to several broadleaf herbicides applied at three different growth stages during 2009. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension fact sheet 10-35. http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/ag/2010/fs1035.pdf

Davison, J., and M. Laca. 2010. Biomass production of 15 teff varieties grown in Churchill County, Nevada during 2009. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet 10-34. http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/ag/2010/fs1034.pdf Miller, D. R. 2010. Teff Grass Crop Overview and Forage Production Guide (Second Edition). Cal/West Seed Company. Woodland, CA. 95695 http://www.calwestseeds.com/products/teff/ Norberg, S., Roseberg, R. J. Charlton, B. and C. Shock. 2009. Teff A New Warm Season Grass for Oregon. Oregon State University Extension Service EM 8970-E. http://library.state.or.us/repository/2008/200811050908063/index.pdf Roseberg, R. J., Norberg, S. Smith, J., Charlton, B., Rykbost, K., and C. Shock. 2006. Yield and quality of teff forage as a function of varying rates of applied irrigation and nitrogen. In: Research in the Klamath Basib 2005 Annual Report, OSU-AES Special Report 1069; 119-136. http://oregonstate.edu/dept/kbrec/sites/default/files/documents/hort/teff.pdf Staniar, W. B., Hall, M.H. and A.L. Burk. 2010. Voluntary intake and digestibility of three cuttings of teff hay fed to horses. J. Anim. Sci. downloaded 11-14-2011. http://jas.fass.org/content/early2010/06/25jas.2009-2668. Figure 1. Average Alfalfa and Teff Hay Prices in Fallon Nevada 2005-2011 300 Alfalfa and Teff Prices 2005 2011 250 200 $ per Ton 150 100 Ave Alfalfa Hay Prices $/ton Ave Teff Hay prices $/ton 50 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Table 1. Selected Average Irrigated Teff Forage Yields in the Western United States 1993-2010 Year Location Average Irrigated Yields (tons/acre) Primary Author 1993 Montana 4.0-6.0 Eckhoff 2005 Oregon 3.3 Norberg & Roseberg 2006 Oregon 5.5 Norberg & Roseberg 2007 Oregon 5.0 Norberg & Roseberg 2003-2006 Nevada 1.6-5.0 Davison 2007-2009 California 5.3-8.9 Miller 2009 Nevada 4.5-9.4 Davison 2010 Nevada 2.6-5.4 Laca 2010 Utah 3.0-3.9 Laca Table 2. Teff biomass yields Nevada 2009 Plant Accession Number/Name Plant status (when harvested) Ave. Biomass Production (tons/acre 100% dry matter) 193508 Lodged 9.4 a* 494465 Immature 8.3 ab 347632 Lodged 8.0 abc 494432 Lodged 7.8 abc 193514 Lodged 7.4 abcd 273889 Lodged 7.2 abcd 494479 Upright 7.0 abcd Uk. Brown Upright 6.6 cde 329680 Upright 6.5 cde Dessie Lodged 5.6 cdef 195932 Upright 5.5 cdef 494366 Upright 4.9 def 557457 Lodged 4.8 def Uk. White Upright 4.7 ef 494433 Immature 4.5 f *Numbers followed by the same number are not significantly different from other varieties at the P<0.05 level

Table 3. Feed Quality for a Three Location Variety Trial (Ontario and Klamath Falls Oregon and Othello Washington Harvest Number Crude Protein Acid Detergent Fiber Neutral Detergent Fiber Relative Feed Value 1 st Cutting Minimum 11.0 36.2 58.0 82 89 Maximum 15.0 42.8 62.8 97 108 Average 13.1 39.8 60.1 90 98 2nd Cutting Minimum 8.1 37.0 58.5 80 78 Maximum 13.0 42.0 66.1 96 104 Average 11.1 39.9 62.0 87 91 Relative Feed Quality Figure 2. Normal irrigation Schedules for Alfalfa and Teff in Western Nevada Inches of Water Applied at Each Irrigation (48" total/season Alfalfa (30" total/season Teff) Inches 4 3 2 1 0 15 Apr 25 Apr 5 May 15 May 25 May 4 Jun 14 Jun 24 Jun 4 Jul 14 Jul 24 Jul 3 Aug 13 Aug 23 Aug 2 Sep 12 Sep 22 Sep 2 Oct 12 Oct Application date Inches of Water Alfalfa Inches of Water Teff