Veganuary Month Survey Results

Similar documents
RESTAURANT OUTLOOK SURVEY

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Chicken Usage Summary

Nationwide Reaction of Chinese KFC Consumers to Shanghai Husi Food Scandal

2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA

World of Wine: From Grape to Glass

Food Allergies on the Rise in American Children

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Presentation from the USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum 2017

Summary Report Survey on Community Perceptions of Wine Businesses

Food Allergy Community Needs Assessment INDIANAPOLIS, IN

Customer Survey Summary of Results March 2015

Cut the cost of coffee in an instant

Coffee market settles lower amidst strong global exports

Hispanic Retail Pilot Test Summary

Consumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based Milks Phase II. January 14, 2019

Traditional Coffee Purchase Drivers

Non-GMO Project Trademark Use Guide

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

FPMS GRAPE PROGRAM NEWSLETTER

CENTER TRT EVALUATION PLAN. Kaiser Permanente Worksite Cafeteria Menu Labeling. Evaluation Plan:

Sample. TO: Prof. Hussain FROM: GROUP (Names of group members) DATE: October 09, 2003 RE: Final Project Proposal for Group Project

The Wild Bean Population: Estimating Population Size Using the Mark and Recapture Method

Seriously, CELIAC. talk.

RIZE ONE 3D PRINTER SPEEDS PART TURNAROUND 20%, SAVES MILLIONS FOR CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS MANUFACTURER

THE WINE AND SPIRIT TRADE ASSOCIATION MARKET REPORT Q To reserve a place please go to

January 2015 WORLD GRAPE MARKET SUPPLY, DEMAND AND FORECAST

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

2. The proposal has been sent to the Virtual Screening Committee (VSC) for evaluation and will be examined by the Executive Board in September 2008.

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

Sonoma County Restaurant Week Report 2012 S O N O M A C O U N T Y

Fleurieu zone (other)

GREAT WINE CAPITALS GLOBAL NETWORK MARKET SURVEY FINANCIAL STABILITY AND VIABILITY OF WINE TOURISM BUSINESS IN THE GWC

Wine On-Premise UK 2016

Statistics: Final Project Report Chipotle Water Cup: Water or Soda?

Date: April 15, Holly Henry From: Daniel DeVries Results from New York survey.

Report Brochure P O R T R A I T S U K REPORT PRICE: GBP 2,500 or 5 Report Credits* UK Portraits 2014

VisitScotland Food & Drink QA Scheme. Taste Our Best. Criteria/Guidance Notes. Visitor Attractions

18 May Primary Production Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington

Supply & Demand for Lake County Wine Grapes. Christian Miller Lake County MOMENTUM April 13, 2015

The Rise of Pop-Up Dining Events and the Experiential Diner

Coffee weather report November 10, 2017.

Taiwan Fishery Trade: Import Demand Market for Shrimps. Bith-Hong Ling

BC WINE INDUSTRY BENCHMARKING

The Market for Northeastern Grown Hops 1

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

U.S. Hispanics and their Purchase, Consumption and Brand Preferences with regard to Avocados

Innovation in a Time of Change

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERALL, WE FOUND THAT:

Nescafé AZERA Influencer Marketing

Clinical Support Services Dining Services Satisfaction Survey Fall 2013

SONOMA COUNTY RESTAURANT WEEK REPORT INDUSTRY REPORT

The Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018

WINTERLICIOUS / SUMMERLICIOUS

Lesson 4. Choose Your Plate. In this lesson, students will:

Trends. in retail. Issue 8 Winter The Evolution of on-demand Food and Beverage Delivery Options. Content

Unilever and tea sustainability. The World of Tea

Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

The University of Georgia

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

Small Winemaker Production and Sales Survey Report November 2017

IFPTI Fellowship Cohort V: Research Presentation Matthew Coleman, R.S., CP-FS

Final Report. The Lunchtime Occasion in Republic of Ireland and Great Britain

How to Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community

Update : Consumer Attitudes

23 rd Clean Up the World in Hong Kong

February Restaurant Business Conditions Report

Shopping behaviours of different food and drinks consumption groups 35% 27% 16%

Rural Vermont s Raw Milk Report to the Legislature

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

OF THE VARIOUS DECIDUOUS and

The following slides collate the insights relating to food and drink only.

Certified Coffees, current market and a vision into the future.

Downward correction in coffee market as supply prospects improve

NSW Food & Wine Festival February 7- March 1, 2015

Eco-Schools USA Sustainable Food Audit

Coonawarra Wine Region. Regional summary report WINEGRAPE UTILISATION AND PRICING SURVEY 2007

1. Quinoa is Incredibly Nutritious

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA.

Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry in and for Reduced Production

Export Essentials Pulse Trade Data

Simplified Summer Feeding Program

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

Click to edit Master title style Delivering World-Class Customer Service Through Lean Thinking

Step 3: Prepare Marketing Packet and Bid Documents - School Food Service Questionnaire14

Sara Lee and SFI Partnering in Sustainability

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community

FAIRTRADE UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE AWARD JOANNA MILIS EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS MANAGER, FAIRTRADE FOUNDATION JO KEMP PROGRAMME MANAGER, NUS

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Franchise Opportunity

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

LEVEL: BEGINNING HIGH

The National Pork Board Pork Champion Quantitative Study Spring RAC 2014

GLOBAL DAIRY UPDATE KEY DATES MARCH 2017

MyPlate. National FCS Standard: Apply various dietary guidelines in planning to meet nutrition and wellness needs.

Transcription:

Veganuary 2016 6-Month Survey Results Project Background Veganuary is a global campaign that encourages people to try eating a vegan diet for the month of January. Following Veganuary 2016, Faunalytics worked with the Veganuary team to conduct an evaluation of the campaign s impact the results can be found here. This report summarizes the results of a separate six-month follow-up survey conducted in August 2016 among all Veganuary participants. In summary, 22,951 people were officially registered for Veganuary 2016, which includes those who signed up on the website and some individuals who were added directly by the Veganuary team. Approximately 5,200 people responded to the survey in February 2016, the results of which are provided in the above-mentioned report and are not repeated here. For the August 2016 survey, 3,369 people responded in full. The surveys were completed between August 8 and August 26, 2016. The survey was sent to all participants from all years, with multiple reminders for nonrespondents. Of the 3,369 people who responded to the August survey, we have registration data for most respondents (3,096) and February 2016 survey data for just under half (1,598). Please note: this report does not contain the complete project background, the full limitations, or our original suggestions, which can be found in the February 2016 report. It is worth reiterating, however, that the results here are particularly subject to nonresponse bias given that fewer than 15% of all Veganuary participants responded to the August 2016 survey. The results are also subject to social desirability bias, issues with selfreported data, and a host of other caveats.

Summary: 6-Month Survey Findings IMPACT: Faunalytics estimates that the potential lifetime impact of Veganuary has been to spare more than 2.2 million animals. This estimates comes with many caveats and assumes that survey respondents are representative of all 2016 Veganuary participants. While this impact is about 41% lower than the estimate provided in February, it suggests that many people (about 38%) may be continuing to consume a reduced level of animal products compared to before Veganuary. SELF-DESCRIBED DIET: In the August 2016 survey, the majority of respondents (63%) reported that their current diet is vegan. Any additional 23% said they are currently vegetarian, 8% reported being pescetarian, and only 6% reported being omnivores. ACTUAL DIET: All participants were provided with a food frequency questionnaire to identify how often they consumed each animal product during the first week of August. We coded the responses and found that 54% of participants actually ate a vegan diet during the week, 26% were vegetarian, 16% were omnivores, and there were just two pescetarians. VEGAN MEALS: Participants were also asked to estimate what proportion of meals they had eaten during the past month were vegan. About half of the survey respondents (49%) reported that all of their meals were vegan, while nearly a fourth (23%) said that 75-99% of their meals were vegan. One in five respondents said that 25-74% of their meals were vegan, while 8% estimated that less than a quarter of their meals in the past 30 days were vegan. INTENDED DIET: Encouragingly, a large majority of survey respondents (79%) say they intend to eat a vegan diet in the future. This includes continuing vegans, but also an additional 16% who currently eat at least some animal products. Another 10% of survey respondents intend to eat a vegetarian diet in the future, while 3% intend to be pescetarian, 2% intend to be omnivores, and 6% are unsure. BENEFITS: Three-fourths of respondents (75%) said they have experienced generally better health since their participation in Veganuary, while only 2% experienced generally worse health. More than half of respondents (54%) say they had more energy, while 5% had less energy. Finally, well over a third of respondents (43%) said they lost weight, while 12% said they gained weight since Veganuary. One in five respondents also wrote in other changes they experienced. ACTIVISM: The vast majority of these Veganuary participants (86%) are involved in some form of animal or vegan advocacy. Since taking part in Veganuary, 20% of respondents report becoming active for the first time. Another 27% say they have become more active since participating in Veganuary. At the same time, a plurality of 40% say they are similarly or less involved in advocacy since taking part in Veganuary. The other 14% report not being involved in any advocacy. INSPIRATION: Underscoring the potential ripple effects of a campaign like Veganuary, nearly twothirds of respondents (63%) say they have inspired others to take steps toward a vegan diet. Another 27% say they are unsure and 9% say they have not inspired anyone. Page 2 of 6

Dietary Changes As a medium-term indicator of how many people intend to continue with their diets after Veganuary, we timed the second follow-up survey to ask about participants diets during the first week of August. This is seven months following the start of Veganuary 2016 and six months after our first follow-up survey in February 2016. The August timeframe should give us a reasonable sense of how many people are actually sticking with the dietary changes they made (or intended to make) during Veganuary 2016. To determine the extent of diet change among participants, we focus on three time periods: diet before Veganuary; diet during the first week of February; and diet during the first week of August. For the participant s diet prior to Veganuary, we are using registration data, but we are missing that information for some respondents. For all other time periods we are using coded FFQ data. It should be noted that fewer than half of August 2016 survey respondents provided data for all three time periods. With those caveats in mind, here is a summary of participants self-reported diets by phase: Prior to Veganuary (N=20,597) During January (N=5,195) First Week of February (N=4,049) First Week of August (N=3,369) Omnivore 34% 16% 15% 20% Pescetarian 12% 9% 9% 0% Vegetarian 34% 24% 29% 26% Vegan 19% 51% 46% 54% As we would expect, the behavior change varies by type of diet. About a third of those who were omnivores (32%) or pescetarians (33%) prior to Veganuary reported eating a vegan diet during the first week in August. Just over half (52%) of those who were previously vegetarian ate a vegan diet in the first week of August. And encouragingly, the vast majority (82%) of those who were vegan prior to Veganuary said they were still vegan during the first week of August (although up to 18% of vegans did appear to lapse during the seven months). These differences are detailed in the table below. Diet During First Week Of August Omnivore Pescetarian Vegetarian Vegan Omnivore 50% 0% 19% 32% Diet Before Veganuary Pescetarian 45% 0% 22% 33% Vegetarian 8% 0% 41% 52% Vegan 5% 0% 12% 82% Page 3 of 6

We are able to get a more accurate picture of behavior change when we review differences at the individual instead of the group level. The table below summarizes how many people shifted between the various diets from prior to Veganuary to the first week of August. During this time, more than a third (38%) of these respondents made a positive change (reduced animal products). By contrast, 13% of respondents reported increasing their consumption of animal products. About half of respondents (48%) indicated that their diet did not change from prior to Veganuary to the first week of August. Diet Pre-Veganuary Vs. Diet During First Week of August "Positive" Changes 38% Omnivore > Pescetarian 0% Omnivore > Vegetarian 4% Omnivore > Vegan 6% Pescetarian > Vegetarian 3% Pescetarian > Vegan 4% Vegetarian > Vegan 22% "Negative" Changes 13% Vegan > Omnivore 1% Vegan > Pescetarian 0% Vegan > Vegetarian 3% Vegetarian > Omnivore 3% Vegetarian > Pescetarian 0% Pescetarian > Omnivore 5% No Changes 48% Omnivore > Omnivore 10% Pescetarian > Pescetarian 0% Vegetarian > Vegetarian 17% Vegan > Vegan 21% If we assume the diets that participants reported for the first week of August are both accurate and sustained (these are big assumptions), then nearly a third of Veganuary participants have become vegan. An additional 7% became vegetarian. If we assume further that these follow-up survey respondents are representative of all Veganuary 2016 participants who were not already vegan, then this year s campaign will have produced 5,316 new vegans and 1,051 new vegetarians (and a handful of new pescetarians). Page 4 of 6

Estimate of Lives Spared We estimate the number of animal lives spared over the course of a participant s lifetime using the same approach as in our February 2016 report. Again, this estimate is based on a number of assumptions and is therefore subject to a range of important caveats. We assume that participants maintain the level of dietary change they exhibited from pre-veganuary to the first week of August. The result is an estimate of more than 2.2 million lives spared over participants lifetimes, as summarized below. LIFETIME % Who Made Transition Participants Transitioning Lives Spared During Lifetime Omnivore > Pescetarian 0% 7 7,158 Omnivore > Vegetarian 4% 867 5,744,529 Omnivore > Vegan 6% 1,475 9,770,608 Pescetarian > Vegetarian 3% 586 3,313,331 Pescetarian > Vegan 4% 875 4,949,026 Vegetarian > Vegan 22% 4,996 0 Vegan > Omnivore 1% 319-2,111,237 Vegan > Pescetarian 0% 0 0 Vegan > Vegetarian 3% 734 0 Vegetarian > Omnivore 3% 756-5,008,051 Vegetarian > Pescetarian 0% 7-41,941 Pescetarian > Omnivore 5% 1,208-1,166,695 Omnivore > Omnivore 10% 2,313 0 Pescetarian > Pescetarian 0% 0 0 Vegetarian > Vegetarian 17% 3,929 0 Vegan > Vegan 21% 4,878 0 TOTAL 100% 22,951 15,456,729 Elasticity Adjusted (50%) 7,728,364 16% maintain changes for "lifetime" 1,236,538 84% maintain changes for 7 years 1,032,791 TOTAL 2,269,329 Page 5 of 6

Additional Conclusions Please see the original report for Faunalytics full conclusions and recommendations from the February 2016 survey. Those conclusions still apply after reviewing the latest round of results. Following are a few additional conclusions based solely on the August survey results. DECLINING IMPACT: As we would expect, the dietary changes that persisted in the first week of February had partly eroded by August 2016. Specifically, the proportion of participants making positive changes dropped from 50% to 38%. The number of new vegans declined from 38% to 32%. The overall estimated impact in terms of lives saved declined from 3.8 million to 2.2 million animals. This suggests that most of the impact we saw in February is persisting in August, but we would expect the impact to decline further as more people lapse from the changes they made. ACTIVISM: There is strong (self-reported) evidence that Veganuary is influential in creating new animal advocates. Nearly half (46%) of participants say they became newly active or became more active since participating in Veganuary. If this were true of all Veganuary participants (though it almost certainly is not), then Veganuary would have created about 4,000 new animal advocates and encouraged many others to become more active than they were before Veganuary. RIPPLE EFFECTS. There are many reasons to think that the estimate of 2.2 million lives spared may be an overstatement. One reason this number may actually be understated, however, is that Veganuary participants are also influencing others. An incredible 63% of Veganuary participants say they have inspired people to take steps toward veganism since Veganuary. Many of these people were likely already animal advocates, but the Veganuary campaign appears to be providing both inspiration and resources to help people influence others to make a change. Page 6 of 6