Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage*

Similar documents
G Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

Identifying Soybean Growth Stages

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

Soybean Production FIELD GUIDE. for North Dakota and Northwestern Minnesota A Fargo, North Dakota

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Soybean. Germination. A Visual Guide to. Growth Stages. cotyledons. radicle. hypocotyl. radicle. growing point. Vegetative Stage Emergence.

Harvest Aids in Soybeans - Application Timing and Value. J.L. Griffin, C.A. Jones, L.M. Etheredge, Jr., J. Boudreaux, and D.Y.

SOYBEAN GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT

Cotton Crop Maturity Determination

Cotton Crop Maturity Determination

Stages Df Soybean üevelcprnent

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Croptime Growth Stage Guide

2016 NCIS Agronomic. Chickpea research in Washington.

Soybean. oybean. Soybean. Growth, development and yield of soybeans are a result of a variety s. Growth and Management QUICK GUIDE

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Dealer Programs To Move Soybean Yields Higher. Missy Bauer B&M Crop Consulting, Inc.

SYLLABUS. Departmental Syllabus. Food Production II CULN0140. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus

Planning for harvest success

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

ational Sunflower Survey: An Overview

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures. Policy Number: Effective Date: 2/9/2018 Page Number: 1 of 5

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Proposed Excess Loss (Pure Premium) Factors

SOY NUGGETS Prepared by the UGA Soybean Team

THE GROWTH OF THE CHERRY OF ROBUSTA COFFEE

2010 Area Crops Evaluation Exam

ACCORDING to the USDA Agricultural

Estimating and Adjusting Crop Weight in Finger Lakes Vineyards

.. Acknowledgment _----_---~

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

2012 National Sunflower Association Survey. Project Leader: Hans Kandel Extension Agronomist NDSU Crop Science Department

5 Populations Estimating Animal Populations by Using the Mark-Recapture Method

Irrigation of Sunflowers in Northwestern Kansas

Corn & Soybean News In this issue:

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Report of Progress 961

1 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations E-77-W E-77-W. Field Crops SOYBEAN INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

The Cranberry. Sample file

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

PLANTING WHEAT SEED DAMAGED BY FROST BEFORE HARVEST

Handbook for Wine Supply Balance Sheet. Wines

Economic and Social Council

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Legume ipmpipe Diagnostic Pocket Series Anthracnose Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (on beans and lentil), C. gloeosporioides (on pea)

Appendices. Section. Food Buying Guide for Child Nu tri tion Pro grams A P P E N D I C E S

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MELAMINE TESTING OF RETAIL MEAT AND POULTY PRODUCTS

Timothy E. Martinson Area Extension Educator Finger Lakes Grape Program Cornell Cooperative Extension

NEW! SMART SNACK COMPLIANT SFC # Whole Grain Chicken Egg Roll (2.5oz) Chef s Corner 1787 Sabre Street Hayward, CA CHEF

Corn Growth and Development

ESTIMATING ANIMAL POPULATIONS ACTIVITY

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Units. More than Sweet. Purpose. Supplies/Equipment Needed. Time Needed. Get Fit 4 Life

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics, 2016

Some Common Insect Enemies

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 EXCERPT: ANNEX I, PART B, PART 9 MARKETING STANDARD FOR TABLE GRAPES

Performance of Small Grain Varieties for Forage in Alabama,

Weekly tax table with no and half Medicare levy

(No. 238) (Approved September 3, 2003) AN ACT

FOUNDATIONS OF RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT & CULINARY ARTS MISE EN PLACE REPORT: ESSENTIAL SKILLS STEPS ESSENTIAL SKILLS STEPS SECOND EDITION

The Wild Bean Population: Estimating Population Size Using the Mark and Recapture Method

Subpart M -- United States Standards for Wheat

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

Compare Measures and Bake Cookies

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

4.5 CSA Crop Planning

Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014

Let s Preserve: Tomatoes and Tomato Products

EFFECTS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND CONTROLLED FRUITING ON COTTON YIELD

SYLLABUS. Departmental Syllabus. Food Production I CULN0130. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

New Mexico Onion Varieties

UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR WHOLE DRY PEAS¹

Using Standardized Recipes in Child Care

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

2009 Conventional and Special Purpose Soybean Varieties

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

CRITERIA AND PROCEDURE

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Potassium Uptake and Partitioning in Determinate and Indeterminate Soybean Genotypes Differing in Maturity Group

Dry Beans XIII-5 Mexican Bean Beetle

FOOD SERVICE APPLICATION EAST LANSING ART FESTIVAL

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

Copyright JnF Specialties, LLC. All rights reserved worldwide.

#611-7 Workbook REVIEW OF PERCOLATION TESTING PROCEDURES. After completing this chapter, you will be able to...

User s Manual. User s Manual Version 1.0. Chulalongkorn University. Raks Thai Foundation. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. January 29 th, 2013

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Step 1: Prepare To Use the System

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

Transcription:

1 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM G85-762-A Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage* This NebGuide discusses the methods used by the hail insurance industry to assess yield loss due to hail damage in soybeans. C. A. Shapiro, Extension Soils Specialist T.A. Peterson, Research Technologist, Dept. of Agronomy A. D. Flowerday, Foyer Professor of Agronomy [Previous Category] [Catalog] [Order Info] Determining Soybean Stages Determining Losses Calculating Actual Loss Due to Hail A hailstorm can cause yield losses in soybeans ranging from slight to total destruction of the crop. Extensive research has been conducted to accurately predict the effects of hail damage on soybean yields. Results from these studies are used by hail insurance companies to assess yield losses and consequent adjustment made to clients. The information in this NebGuide should be valuable to producers facing replant decisions, and may also be useful in cases of insect damage. Yield loss predictions are based on two factors: a) stage of growth at the time of damage, and b) the degree of plant damage. Plant damage is classified as leaf defoliation, stand reduction, stem damage, and pod damage. Determining Soybean Stages Accurate determination of stage of growth is necessary to determine yield loss due to hail. W. R. Fehr and C. E. Caviness developed one of the most widely accepted systems for describing soybean growth stages (Table I). Vegetative growth stages (or V-stages) are identified by the number of nodes above the cotyledons. A node is counted when the attached leaf is completely unfurled. Reproductive stages (R-stages) occur after the plant begins to flower and are defined by the development of the flowers, pods, and seeds. Determinate soybeans cease vegetative growth when flowering begins; indeterminate varieties continue to grow during reproductive stages. Most soybean varieties grown in Nebraska are indeterminate. Table I. Description of soybean growth stages. Stage Description¹

VE VC Emergence (10 days to V1).² Cotyledons (seed leaves) exposed, but no true leaves exposed. V1 Two nodes on the main stem with fully developed leaves, beginning with the unifoliate leaf node (5 days). V2 V3 V8 R1 R2 R3 R4 Three nodes on main stem with fully developed leaves (5 days). Four nodes on main stem with fully developed leaves (5 days)...(pattern continues: 5 days for V4-V5; 3 days for each following V5). Nine nodes on the main stem with fully developed leaves, beginning with the unifoliate leaf node. One flower appearing at any node (10 days to R3). Open flower at one of the two uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed node (full bloom stage). Pod 0.5 cm (1/4 inch) long at one of four uppermost nodes with a fully developed leaf (9 days). Pod 2 cm (3/4 inch) long at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf (full pod, 9 days). R5 Beans beginning to develop at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf. A bean is beginning to develop when it can be felt if the pod is squeezed (beginning seed stage). ¹These descriptions were taken from Fehr, W.R. and C.E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Coop. Ext. Serv., Iowa State Univ., Spec. Rep. No. 53 (revised). ²Typical number of days to the next growth stage under Nebraska conditions. 1. Determining Losses Stand reduction is a measure of the number of plants killed by the storm. The pre-storm plant population is compared to the remaining stand 7 to 10 days after the storm to determine the yield loss due to stand reduction. To determine the pre-storm population, count the original number of plants in 10 feet of row. Repeat this step several times throughout the field to get a representative sample. Now convert the average stand per 10 feet of row to plants per acre, using the following formula: (ave. # plants in 10' row) 52,250 = # plants per acre (row spacing in inches) Using the same procedure, determine the remaining live plant population. Original and final plant populations are used to estimate yield loss due to stand reduction (Table II). Table II is valid through all vegetative growth stages (i.e., before flowering begins). Stand loss during reproductive stages reduces yield proportionately, or 1 percent yield loss for each 1 percent stand loss. Table II. Percent field loss of soybean as affected by the amount of stand reduction (all stand figures in 1,000 plants/acre). Original Stand Remaining Stand 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 2 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM

3 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM 2. ---------------------------------- Percent ---------------------------------- 125 1 3 6 10 14 18 24 30 36 44 54 65 120 0 1 5 9 13 17 23 29 35 43 53 64 110 -- 0 3 7 11 15 21 27 33 41 51 62 100 -- -- 0 3 7 11 17 23 29 37 45 59 90 -- -- -- 0 3 7 13 19 25 33 43 55 80 -- -- -- -- 0 4 10 16 22 30 40 52 70 -- -- -- -- -- 0 6 12 18 25 35 48 60 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 7 13 20 30 45 50 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 8 16 25 41 40 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 11 23 39 Defoliation is measured as a percentage of the leaf area destroyed by the storm. Leaf tissue that is green and still attached to the plant will continue to produce photosynthate, and is not considered leaf area destroyed. Research has shown that leaf loss during vegetative stages has little effect on yield. Defoliation loss is measured only in the reproductive stages for indeterminate varieties. To determine the amount of leaf area destroyed, examine each exposed leaf and estimate the leaf area that was present before the storm. (There is a tendency to overestimate defoliation percentage. Each leaf should be examined individually.) Evaluate 20 plants for growth stage and determine the percent leaf area destroyed. Average values are compared to Table III (for indeterminate varieties) or Table IV (for determinates) to find the estimated percent yield reduction due to defoliation. Table III. Percent yield loss of indeterminant soybean varieties as affected by degree of defoliation. Defoliation (% leaf area destroyed) Stage 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 R1-2 0 2 3 5 6 7 9 12 16 23 R3 2 3 4 6 8 11 14 18 24 33 R4 3 5 7 9 12 16 22 30 39 56 R5 4 7 10 13 17 23 31 43 58 75 R6 1 6 9 11 14 18 23 31 41 53 Table IV. Percent yield loss of determinant soybean varieties as affected by degree of defoliation. Defoliation (% leaf area destroyed) Stage 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 V9-V12 0 0 0 0 4 5 7 8 9 10 V13-V n 0 0 0 3 8 9 11 14 19 25 R1-R2 0 0 0 6 11 13 15 20 32 40

4 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM 3. R3 0 0 5 7 12 14 17 25 40 50 R4 0 5 7 9 12 16 19 30 43 76 R5 3 5 8 11 15 18 23 35 50 84 R6 2 4 6 8 11 13 17 25 36 62 Stem damage is further divided into stem cutoff (stems completely cut off and removed from the plant) and stems bent or broken over. To determine the amount of stem damage, count the number of nodes above the cotyledonary node present at the date of loss. Estimate the number of nodes that have been cut off from the plant. Count the number of nodes above the break or broken over part of the stems. Keep separate the number of nodes cut off from those on a broken over portion of the stem. Plants that are bruised but still standing are not counted. Sample 20 plants, then compare the averages with Table V (for nodes cut off) and Table VI (for nodes broken over). These tables provide an estimate of percent yield loss due to stem damage. Percent yield losses due to stem cutoff, broken over stems, and defoliation are added together to determine the percent plant damage. Table V. Percent yield reduction in soybeans as affected by nodes cut off (number of nodes cut off expressed as percent of total number of nodes). Stage -----------------Percent Nodes Cut Off----------------- 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 V1-V n 0 1 3 5 7 11 18 R1-R2 1 4 9 12 16 23 R2.5 2 6 10 14 18 24 32 R3 3 9 14 19 25 32 41 R3.5 4 12 19 27 35 43 53 Table VI. Percent yield reduction of soybeans as affected by nodes broken over (number of nodes broken over expressed as percent of total number of nodes). Stage -----------------Percent Nodes Cut Off----------------- 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 V1-V n 0 0 1 2 3 5 8 R1-R2 0 1 2 4 6 10 14 R2.5 1 3 6 9 11 16 20 R3 2 6 10 14 17 21 25 R3.5 2 8 13 18 23 28 33 Calculating Actual Loss Due to Hail Direct damage is the sum of the yield losses from stand reduction and pod damage (when appropriate). The plant damage--the sum of losses due to stem cutoff, broken over, and defoliation--is multiplied by the remaining percent stand to find the plant damage loss. Actual hail loss is the sum of direct damage and plant

5 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM damage loss. Figure 1 is a worksheet for estimating percent yield loss showing an example calculation. This example assumes a soybean field in the R1 stage was hail damaged. The stand was reduced from 57 plants to 40 plants per 10' of row. Defoliation and stem damage figures are shown. There was no pod damage. Figure 1. Soybean yield loss worksheet DATE OF STORM: EXAMPLE YOUR FIGURES 1. Stage (Table I) R1 2. Stand Reduction: 6.a) original plants in 10' of row 57 6.b) row spacing in inches 30 6.c) original stand (in plants/acre) --(57/30) 52,250 100,000 6.d) final # plants in 10' row 40 6.e) final stand (in plants/acre) --(40/30) 52,250 70,000 6.f) percent stand remaining --(70,000/100,000) = 0.70 70% 6.g) Yield loss (from Table II) 11% 6.h) Yield loss due to pod damage 0% 6.i) Total direct damage (2g. + 2h.) 11% 3. Defoliation (R-stages only): 6.a) Ave. % leaf area destroyed 60% 6.b) Yield loss (Table III or Table IV) --(for an indeterminant variety) 7% 4. Stem damage: 6.a) Total nodes above cotyledons --before the storm on 20 plants 100 6.b) Number of nodes cut off completely --from 20 plants 25 6.c) Percent nodes cut off (25/100) 100% 25% 6.d) Yield loss from Table V. 7% 6.f) Number of nodes on broken over or bent --portion of stem on 20 plants 55 6.g) Percent nodes broken over --(55/100) 100% 55% 6.h) Yield loss from Table VI. 10% 5. Plant damage loss c) --[(3b. + 4d. + 4h.) 2f/100.] or 16.8%

6 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM c) --[(7% + 7% + 10%) 0.70 6. Actual Yield Loss c) --[direct damage (line 2i) + plant damage loss (line 5)] c) --(or 11% + 16.8%) 27.8% These instructions are intended as a general guideline for assessing soybean yield loss due to hail damage. Individual hail insurance companies may defer final yield loss determination until later in the season. Although early season defoliation appears quite devastating, research has shown that soybean plants can recover under favorable growing conditions. These instructions are continually being revised as further research becomes available. Specific predictions should be left to trained hail adjusters. *This NebGuide is based on the system developed by the National Crop Insurance Association (Publication No. 6302, SOYBEAN LOSS INSTRUCTION Rev. 1985). File G762 under: FIELD CROPS A-8, Soybeans Issued November 1985; 12,000 printed. Electronic version issued May 1997 pubs@unl.edu Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.