Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Similar documents
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Table of Contents Introduction Materials and Methods Results

Report of Progress 961

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

RESEARCH REPORT - OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION. Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials 2014

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

SEEDLESS WATERMELON VARIETY TRIAL, Shubin K. Saha, Extension Vegetable Specialist University of Kentucky

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

VARIETY TRIALS Shubin K. Saha and Dan Egel, SWPAC

Winter Barley Cultivar Trial Report: Caroline Wise, Masoud Hashemi and Talia Aronson

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 1998

2006 New Mexico Farmer Silage Trials

Strawberry Variety Trial

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Southwest Indiana Triploid Watermelon Variety Trial 2012

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

PROCESSING TOMATO CULTIVAR TRIALS RESEARCH REPORT

Materials and Methods

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

2014 Organic Silage Corn Variety Trial for Coastal Humboldt County

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2009 Vermont Food Grade Soybean Performance Trial Results

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

Perfom-twnce Of Ryearass Vaieties in A17afa ma

Relationships Between Descriptive Beef Flavor Attributes and Consumer Liking

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Report of Progress 945

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

STUDIES ON THE HORTICULTURAL AND BREEDING VALUE OF SOME STRAWBERRY, RASPBERRY AND BLACKBERRY GENOTYPES

Vegetable. Variety Trials Fall Regional Bulletin 32. Auburn University

2011 BARLEY VARIETY TRIALS MATERIALS AND METHODS

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Tomato Variety Trials, 2007

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Organic Seed Partnership

Diversified Crops Report 13 Previously called Other Crops Report

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Observations on Sunflower Rust in Nebraska and Management Efforts with Fungicide Application Timings

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO (CONT) 2014 Annual Report

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Daikon Variety Trials at the UH Poamoho Experiment Station Oahu, Hawaii, November 2008

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Sowing Date Effect on Spring Safflower Cultivars

Evaluation of Twelve Greenhouse Mini Cucumber (Beit Alpha) Cultivars and Two Growing Systems During the Winter Season in Florida

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Weed Control Efficacy and Crop Damage by. Carfentrazone-ethyl (Aim ) Herbicide on Sweet Corn

Yield and Quality of Spring-Planted, Day-Neutral Strawberries in a High Tunnel

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

Transcription:

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive, and fruit size was very large for most of the large fruited cultivars. Autumn King, Gold Rush, Mother Lode, Magic Lantern, Gold Fever, HMX 6689', and HMX 9698' produced a high tonnage of large fruit. The small fruited cultivars performed well, although size and appearance varied with cultivar. Introduction Pumpkins are grown in large commercial acreage for the Halloween market in Tennessee. An estimated 3500 acres of pumpkins are produced in Tennessee, with over half on the Cumberland Plateau. Pumpkins have been a profitable crop in recent years, and acreage production seems to increase each year. Several tobacco and row crop producers have considered or actually produced pumpkins as an alternative crop. Pumpkin production has many problems that need to be addressed for successful production of pumpkins. Weed control can be a problem in pumpkins as labeled herbicides fail to control all species of weeds adequately. Insecticides and fungicides need to be applied on a 7 to 10 day frequency. Bees are needed for pollination. Pumpkins require a fairly high degree of management for successful results. An experiment was conducted at the Plateau Experiment Station at Crossville, TN in 2000 to evaluate performance of 21 pumpkin cultivars. Materials and Methods The site was prepared for planting by conventional tillage methods. Fertilizer was broadcast at 400 lb/a of 15-15-15 and incorporated with a disk on May 22. Bensulide (Prefar) was applied at 6.0 lb ai/a on May 31 and soil incorprated with the final disking. Plots were direct seeded with the selected cultivars on June 1. Plot size was one row, with a spacing of 12 by 20 ft. Each row contained 5 hills with 3 seeds/hill. After germination, hills were thinned to 2 plants/hill. Experimental plot design was a randomized complete block with four replications. A preemergence application of clomazone (Command) at 0.375 lb ai/a was made on June 3. Insect control was by esfenvalerate (Asana) at 0.05 lb ai/a alternated with carbaryl (Sevin) at 1.0 lb ai/a on a 7 to 10 day frequency. Fungicides were azoxystrobin (Quadris) at 0.25 lb ai/a alternated with a combination of chlorothalonil (Bravo) at 2.0 lb ai/a and myclobutanil (Nova) at 0.125 lb ai/a applied with each insecticide treatment. Pumpkins were harvested on Sept 27 and 28. Harvested pumpkins were sorted according to sizes of over 20 lb, 15 to 20 lb, 10 to 15 lb, and less than 10 lb. Number and weight of

pumpkins in each weight range were recorded. Quality ratings were made at harvest. All ratings were on a 1 to 10 scale with 10 the most desirable. All data were analyzed by analysis of variance methods, and means were separated by Duncan s multiple range tests at the 0.05 level. Results and Discussion HMX 6689' produced more total tons of pumpkins than all cultivars except Autumn King, Magic Lantern and Mother Lode (Table 1). Baby Pam and Wee-B-Little produced less tonnage than all cultivars except Peek-A-Boo and RWS 6260'. The six small fruited cultivars did not produce any pumpkins that weighed over 10 lb. Hybrid Pam produced a higher tonnage in the less than 10 lb class than any other cultivar. Gold Rush produced a larger tonnage that weighed over 20 lb per pumpkin than all cultivars except Gold Strike, Howden, HMX 6689', HMX 9698' and Mother Lode'. Appalachian produced a higher tonnage that weighed between 15 and 20 lb per pumpkin than all cultivars except Gold Fever and HMX 6689'. of HMX 9698', HMX 6689', Autumn King and Gold Strike averaged over 20 lb per pumpkin. Gold Rush, Howden, and Mother Lode fruit averaged almost 20 lb per pumpkin. Touch of Autumn and Wee-B-Little produced more pumpkins per acre and more pumpkins that weighed less than 10 lb per pumpkin than any other cultivar (Table 2). Yields in number of fruit per acre generally were very high and Howden, the check cultivar, produced 2450 pumpkins per acre. This is a high yield since the row spacing was 12 ft in order to help separate the cultivars at harvest. Autumn King produced more fruit that weighed over 20 lb per pumpkin than all cultivars except Appalachian, Gold Rush, and Mother Lode. Magic Lantern and HMX 6689' produced more pumpkins per acre in the 15 to 20 lb class than all cultivars except Appalachian and Gold Fever. Most cultivars were rated high for quality characteristics (Table 3). HMX 4694', HMX 9698', Magic Lantern and Merlin were among cultivars rated high for fruit color. Ratings for appearance were not significantly different due to cultivar. of Gold Rush and Howdy Doody had very large and nice stems. Cultivars varied in uniformity, as size and shape of pumpkins was not uniform within a cultivar. Wee-B-Little was rated as one of the most uniform cultivars in fruit type. of Autumn King was among the largest in diameter and fruit of Wee-B-Little was among the lowest in diameter. Gold Rush was among cultivars with the most length while Wee-B-Little was among cultivars with the least fruit length. Table 1. Yield in tons per acre of different size classes of pumpkin cultivars at The University of Tennessee Plateau Experiment Station at Crossville, 2000. Total Pumpkins< Pumpkins10- Pumpkins Pumpkins Pum

yield - 10 lb 15 lb 15-20 lb >20 lb average Cultivar wt - lb Appalachian 25.1 bcd z 1.5 gh 3.8 cde 7.8 ab 17.2 bc 14.8 ef Autumn King 28.8 ab 0.4 h 2.0 ef 2.0 def 23.6 a 23.6 a Gold Fever 22.9 b-e 6.0 de 8.2 b 7.7 ab 1.0 h 11.0 g Gold Rush 22.3 b-e 0.2 h 0.9 ef 2.4 ef 18.8 abc 23.2 a Gold Standard 23.5 b-e 4.9 def 11.8 a 5.9 a-e 0.9 h 11.9 fg Gold Strike 21.8 b-e 0.4 h 3.0 def 4.6 b-e 13.8 cde 20.7 abc Howden (Ck) 23.0 b-e 1.0 gh 3.1 def 4.8 bcde 14.0 cde 18.8 abc Howdy Doody 17.7 c-f 3.0 fg 8.0 b 7.2 abc 4.1 hg 11.9 fg HMX 4694 23.9 b-e 1.7 gh 5.7 bcd 9.5 a 6.0 fgh 15.1 ef HMX 6689 23.6 a 0 h 1.7 ef 6.3 a-d 22.9 ab 23.6 a HMX 9698 20.9 c-f 1.1 gh 2.1 ef 3.5 c-f 10.9 bef 20.5 abc Magic Lantern 26.2 abc 1.7 gh 6.2 bc 9.2 a 9.0 efg 16.3 de Merlin 15.8 efgh 4.1 ef 6.2 bc 3.3 def 2.1 h 11.1 g Mother Lode 25.6 a-d 0.8 h 2.7 def 5.3 b-e 17.7 bcd 19.9 a-d Old Zebs 20.0 c-f 1.0 gh 3.2 def 5.2 b-e 10.2 ef 17.5 cde Small fruited Baby Pam 6.5 j 6.5 d 0 f 0 f 0 h 2.5 hi Hybrid Pam 14.1 f-h 14.1 a 0 f 0 f 0 h 5.6 h Peek-A-Boo 9.8 hj 9.8 c 0 f 0 f 0 h 3.8 hi

RWS 6260 9.9 hj 9.9 c 0 f 0 f 0 h 2.3 hi Touch of Autumn 11.9 ghi 11.9 b 0 f 0 f 0 h 2.2 hi Wee-B-Little 3.7 j 3.7 f 0 f 0 f 0 h 0.7 i z Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level of probability, Duncan s multiple range tests. Table 2. Yield in number per acre of different size classes of pumpkin cultivars at The University of Tennessee Plateau Experiment Station at Crossville, 2000. Cultivar total yield - no. Pumpkins< 10 lb Pumpkins10-15 lb Pumpkins15-20 lb Pumpkins>20 lb See sou Appalachian 3766 c-f z 454 de 590 cdef 908 ab 1407 abc Pet Autumn King Gold Fever Gold Rush Gold Standard Gold Strike Howden (Ck) Howdy Doody 2450 4125 cd 1906 g 3948 c-e 2178 fg 2450 2813 91 e 318 fg 318 cde 1724 a Rup 1770 d 1361 b 908 ab 91 gh Rup 45 e 1360 fg 272 de 1452 ab Rup 1270 de 1906 a 726 abc 91 gh Rup 91 e 2454 efg 544 bcd 1089 bcd Rup 272 de 499 def 544 bcd 1134 bcd Ha 862 de 1316 b 862 ab 499 efg Rup HMX 4694 2995 454 de 862 cde 1134 a 544 ef Ha

HMX 6689 HMX 9698 Magic Lantern Merlin Mother Lode Old Zebs Small type Baby Pam Hybrid Pam Peek-A-Boo RWS 6260 Touch of Autumn Wee-B-Little 2768 2133 fg 3222 2904 2586 2269 eg 5354 c 5037 c 5173 c 8621 b 10890 a 10209 a 0 e 272 fg 726 abc 1679 a Harris 309 de 318 fg 408 cde 998 cd Harris 454 de 953 bcd 1044 a 771 de Harris 1406 de 998 bc 363 cde 182 fgh Harris 227 e 408 efg 590 bcd 1407 abc Rupp 318 de 499 def 590 bcd 817 de Rupp 5354 c 0 g 0 e 0 h Seedway 5037 c 0 g 0 e 0 h Seedway 5173 c 0 g 0 e 0 h Novartis 8621 b 0 g 0 e 0 h Novartis 10890 a 0 g 0 e 0 h Novartis 10209 a 0 g 0 e 0 h Novartis z Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level of probability, Duncan s multiple range tests. Table 3. Quality ratings of pumpkin cultivars at The University of Tennessee Plateau Experiment Station at Crossville, 2000.

Cultivar color app. Stem quality uniformity length diameter Appalachian 9.00 abcd z 9.25 a 8.75 abc 8.00 bcd 11.30 b-f 10.22 b-e Autumn King 9.25 abcd 8.75 a 8.50 bc 8.25 bcd 13.50 a 10.95 a-d Gold Fever 9.00 abcd 8.75 a 9.00 abc 7.25 de 8.25 i 8.05 fg Gold Rush 8.75 bcd 7.75 a 10.00 a 7.50 cde 10.60 d-g 12.35 a Gold Standard 8.75 bcd 8.50 a 9.00 abc 8.50 abcd 9.17 fgh 9.45 def Gold Strike 8.50 cd 8.25 a 9.25 ab 8.00 bcd 12.12 a-d 9.82 b-e Howden (Ck) 9.75 ab 8.25 a 8.75 abc 8.50 abcd 11.50 a-f 10.90 a-d Howdy Doody 8.25 b 8.25 a 10.00 a 7.50 cde 8.72 hi 9.55 c-f HMX 4694 10.00 a 10.00 a 9.00 abc 8.50 abcd 11.25 c-f 10.42 bcd HMX 6689 10.00 a 9.00 a 8.25 bc 6.25 e 12.32 a-c 11.40 abc HMX 9698 9.25 abcd 8.75 a 9.00 abc 8.00 bcd 11.97 a-e 9.87 b-e Magic Lantern 10.00 a 9.75 a 8.50 bc 8.50 abcd 10.42 efg 10.32 bcd Merlin 10.00 a 8.50 a 9.25 ab 6.25 e 9.12 ghi 8.47 efg Mother Lode 8.25 d 7.75 a 7.25 c 7.25 de 12.25 ab 10.12 b-e Old Zebs 9.25 ab 9.00 a 8.75 abc 7.50 cde 10.17 fgh 11.67 ab Small type Baby Pam 9.25 abcd 7.75 a 9.00 abc 9.00 ab 5.22 j 5.12 ij Hybrid Pam 10.0 a 9.75 a 9.50 ab 8.75 abc 5.90 j 6.95 gh Peek-A-Boo 8.75 bcd 8.25 a 8.25 bc 8.25 bcd 5.60 j 6.05 hi

RWS 6260 8.25 d 8.00 a 8.25 bc 9.00 ab 4.50 j 4.55 ij Touch of Autumn 8.50 cd 8.00 a 8.25 bc 8.50 abcd 5.00 j 4.57 ij Wee-B-Little 9.75 ab 7.75 a 8.50 bc 9.75 a 2.57 k 3.42 j z Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level of probability, Duncan s multiple range tests. Copyright 1999 by The University of Tennessee. All rights reserved. This research represents one season's data and does not constitute recommendations. After sufficient data is collected over the appropriate number of seasons, final recommendations will be made through research and extension publications.