Pathogenicity of Phytophthora nicotianae isolates to tobacco and tomato cultivars

Similar documents
Geographical Distribution and Causal Agents of Chile Pepper Wilt in New Mexico

Screening the susceptibility of some sweet cherry cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolates by immature fruitlet test

Janice Y. Uchida Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences University of Hawaii at Manoa

Chris Smart, Holly Lange, Amara Dunn, Lisa Jones and Maryn Carlson. Cornell University Geneva, NY

Pathogenicity of 11 Phytophthora species on CAB-6P cherry rootstock

Chris Smart. Plant Pathology and Plant- Microbe Biology Cornell University Geneva, NY

California Certified Strawberry Nurseries: pathogens of regulatory significance for the Santa Maria area

Differences in virulence of Phytophthora capsici isolates from a worldwide collection on tomato fruits

Ceratocystis fimbriata a new fungal pathogen of kiwifruit in Brazil

RUST RESISTANCE IN WILD HELIANTHUS ANNUUS AND VARIATION BY GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTORATE OF RAPESEED-MUSTARD RESEARCH, BHARATPUR, INDIA

Chemical Control of Avocado Root Rot and Stem Canker

(Definition modified from APSnet)

New Certification Scheme for Raspberries. Alison Dolan

Management of cucurbit diseases in the panhandle: Notes for 2016

Twig Die-Back of Tea Caused by. Macrophoma theicola in Taiwan*

Volume XVI, Number 15 4 November Litchi tomato is expected not to be a significant inoculum source for V. dahliae and Colletotrichum coccodes.

Occurrence of Phytophthora root and collar rot disease of kiwifruit orchards in the west part of the Mazandaran Province

Vegetable Diseases Caused by Phytophthora capsici in Arizona

Santa Barbara County Agricultural Commissioner

Project Justification: Objectives: Accomplishments:

Vegetable Diseases Caused by Phytophthora capsici in Florida 1

Recognizing and Managing Blueberry Diseases

Fruit rot of tomato caused by Gilbertella persicaria.

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

GROWTH RATES OF RIPE ROT FUNGI AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES

Diagnosis of Wood Canker Causing Pathogens in Dried Plum

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

Major seed-borne diseases in Indonesia. A.S. Duriat & J.M. van der Wolf

Bacterial stem canker

25.1 Bacterial canker; wilted plants; see also 18.1a-c Bacterial stem rot; petiole and leaf symptoms.

GUIDE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF IMPORTANT DISEASES IN STRAWBERRY IN CALIFORNIA

Fomitiporia mediterranea infecting citrus trees in Greece

IMPACT OF RAINFALL PRIOR TO HARVEST ON RIPE FRUIT QUALITY OF HASS AVOCADOS IN NEW ZEALAND

Watermelon production IDEA-NEW

Plant Disease & Pest Management Guide Edition

Bacterial canker of sweet cherry in Oregon Disease symptoms, cycle, and management

Diagnosis and detection of fungi occurring on grapevines in Australia 8th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2003

Dark Tobacco. Seeds. grow. that. your business. Pelleted with Incotec Technology

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Cedar-quince rust on juniper- Gymnosporangium clavipes

Dynamics of Hybrid Sunflower Disease Resistance

Legume ipmpipe Diagnostic Pocket Series Anthracnose Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (on beans and lentil), C. gloeosporioides (on pea)

Forest Pathology in New Zealand No. 22 (Second Edition 2010) Lupin blight. Monique Williams

Fungal Fungal Disease Citrus Black Black Spot Guignardia Guignardia citricarpa ): Id I entifi f catio ion io, Biology Biology and and Control

Vegetable Diseases Caused by Phytophthora capsici in Florida 1

Field Crops Soybeans. Disease. Seedling Disease (Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora, Pythium, etc.)

MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO (CONT) 2014 Annual Report

Phytophthora citricola Advances in our Understanding of the Disease

NEW ZEALAND AVOCADO FRUIT QUALITY: THE IMPACT OF STORAGE TEMPERATURE AND MATURITY

A new approach to understand and control bitter pit in apple

Screening for Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in Hybrid Seedlings of American Chestnut 1

Plants in the Apiaceae (parsley family)

Susceptibility of sunflower breeding material to Alternaria sp.

Evaluation of Commercial Bell Pepper Cultivars for Resistance to Phytophthora Blight (Phytophthora capsici)

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

What Lurks in Your Canola Field: Disease Surveys of Debra McLaren & Anastasia Kubinec AAFC-Brandon and MAFRI-Carman

Leonard P. Gianessi Cressida S. Silvers Sujatha Sankula Janet E. Carpenter

A.M.Z. Chamango 1, Gomonda, R.W.J. 1, Mainjeni, C.E.D. 1, Msangosoko K.R. 1 and Kumwenda, R.L.N. 1

First Occurence and Susceptibility of Prunus Species to Erwinia amylovora in Hungary

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Updates on Powdery Mildew and other Diseases of Cucurbits

Bacterial wilt of geranium and portulaca caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in Japan

Problems affecting seeds and seedlings

Two of the most important invasive Phytophthora pathways into California wildlands

Canker Diseases of Almond. December 10, 2015

Phytophthora root rot of sweet pepper

Influence of Seed Health on the Germination Quality of Seeds

CONTENTS. First Printing 1M, August Auburn University is an equal opportunity educational institution/employer.

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Two New Verticillium Threats to Sunflower in North America

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Downy Mildew Confirmed in Ohio Cucumbers

STUDIES ON THE COMMON SMUT DISEASE OF CORN

November 2016 PEST Report - THE NETHERLANDS CLOSING NOTE

soils. Proper disease identification is crucial to developing management strategies.

EVALUATION OF WILD JUGLANS SPECIES FOR CROWN GALL RESISTANCE

Tospoviruses of Tomato and Management. Shouan Zhang Associate Professor Tropical Research and Education Center University of Florida, IFAS

STEM-END ROTS : INFECTION OF RIPENING FRUIT

Nectria flute canker

Reevaluation of Phomopsis species affecting sunflowers in the United States

Efficacy of Pre-harvest Fungicide Applications and Cold Storage for Postharvest Control of Botrytis Fruit Rot (Gray Mold) on Red Raspberry

The Power of Native Yeasts

Current status of virus diseases in Washington State vineyards

Evaluation of Phosphonate Treatments for Control of Phytophthora Crown Rot of Walnut

William J. Stambaugh and Bruce L. Nash

Peppers SEASONAL AVAILABILITY

Peanut disease photos

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois Tree Fruit Schools 2,3 February 2016

Biofumigant effect of defatted seed meals against the southern root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita

International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Current research status and strategic challenges on the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus in Uganda

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 3 August 2015 Columbia, MO

Museum Victoria CRC National Plant Biosecurity

TORELANCE LEVEL OF DIFFERENT CABBAGE VARIETIES TO BLACK ROT BY: MUNENE DAVID M. A22/0081/2009 SUPERVISOR: PROF. DANIEL MUKUNYA

Cankers. FRST 307 Fall 2017

American. SugarcaneJ>eague, New Orleans, La. and Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, La.

New Developments in Tomato and Lettuce Pest Management in California

Transcription:

Phytopathol. Mediterr. (2000) 39, 245-250 RESEARCH PAPERS Pathogenicity of Phytophthora nicotianae isolates to tobacco and tomato cultivars KALOMIRA ELENA Benaki Phytopathological Institute, St. Delta 8, GR-145 61 Kifissia, Athens, Greece Summary. Sixty-one isolates of Phytophthora nicotianae were tested for pathogenicity to tobacco and tomato. All the isolates but one from tobacco were pathogenic to tobacco but none of the isolates from tobacco were pathogenic to tomato. Of the 53 isolates from non tobacco hosts, 19 proved pathogenic to tomato. Seven isolates from different non tobacco hosts colonized the tobacco stem and produced necrosis but not black shank. Five isolates colonized the tomato stem without causing disease symptoms. Tobacco cultivars BX 2a and KP 14/a were susceptible to isolate BPIC 1921. Tomato cv. Early Pak was susceptible to isolate BPIC 1932 and the Tondino cv. was susceptible to isolate BPIC 1933. No isolate was virulent on both tobacco and tomato. Our results showed that the black-shank isolates of P. nicotianae are a separate group with a specific pathogenicity to tobacco plants only and that prolonged growth in colture may or may not produce loss of virulence - pathogenicity. Key words: black shank, Phytophthora nicotianae, tobacco, tomato. Introduction Phytophthora nicotianae Breda de Haan (syn. Phytophthora parasitica Dastur) is a destructive pathogen on a wide range of herbaceous and woody plants, which causes black shank on all types of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). This is the most destructive disease of tobacco and has spread to most tobacco growing countries in the world (Sarejianni and Stamatini, 1935; Colas et al., 1998). P. To correspond with the author: Fax: + 30 1 8077506 E-mail: bpibact@otenet.gr nicotianae infects roots, basal parts of the stem (black shank) and leaves of tobacco. Young tobacco seedlings are very susceptible to infection and they damp off (Lucas, 1965), while the older plants are attacked on foot or higher (30 cm or more). The first symptom of the disease is the wilting or dropping of all leaves and severity is generally related to the extent of the local lesion. This wilting is more rapid and severe than that occurring in Fusarium wilt of tobacco. Tobacco leaves turn brown, shrivel and they are not marketable. In resistant cultivars, the roots may become infected and rot, but the upper leaves remain green without obvious symptom development (Shew, 1991). The fungus is spread by water, and by infested soil (Lucas,1965) 245

K. Elena which facilitates secondary infections (Shew, 1987). The severity of black shank is increased by concomitant infections with root-knot nematodes. Tobacco cultivars vary significantly in their level of resistance to black shank. Cultivars resistant to black shank lose much of their resistance if infected by root-knot nematodes (Shew, 1991). Black shank is controlled by means of cultural practices, nematode control, fungicides and host resistance. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) has also been reported to be attacked by P. nicotianae (buckeye and stem rot). The fungus causes seedling damping off, stem canker near the soil and fruit rot. The affected seedlings often fail to become established and may wilt, especially under unfavourable conditions. In older plants the fungus produces a dark-brown to black canker at soil level, which often extends below ground but may reach 60-120 cm above ground in wet greenhouses. Buckeye rot of fruits is a common disease transmitted mainly when contaminated soil is splashed onto plants. A characteristic symptom of buckeye rot is the formation of brown, concentric rings on a grey-brown lesion with a grey centre (Sherf and Macnab, 1986; Fletcher, 1989; Stevenson, 1991). Isolates of P. nicotianae from tobacco are a separate group, specialized in causing only black shank and only on tobacco (Ho and Jong, 1989; Ricci et al., 1992). Besides pathogenicity, P. nicotianae isolates from tobacco can be differentiated because they do not produce parasiticein, a protein elicitor (Ricci et al., 1992). The purpose of the present study was to determine the pathogenicity of 61 isolates of Phytophthora nicotianae from various hosts, including tobacco and tomato, on tobacco and tomato plants, and to evaluate the susceptibility of five tobacco and two tomato cultivars to this pathogen. Materials and methods Sixty-one cultures of P. nicotianae strains, isolated from a diversity of plant hosts and geographic locations in Greece were used. Four isolates were received from J.L. Apple (USA) and one from the CBS collection (The Netherlands). All strains were included in the Benaki Phytopathological Institute Culture Collection (BPIC) and they were kept on corn meal agar (CMA) slants at 22 C (Table I). Isolates were subcultured on CMA in 9-cm Petri dishes at 22 C for 7 days. Inoculum for infecting the soil was prepared by blending the contents of 14 inoculated dishes in a litre of deionized water (Carlston et al., 1977). Plant material Young plants of tobacco (cv. BX 2a Oriental aromatic) and tomato (cv. Early Pak No. 7) were used. Tobacco seeds were sown in pots with compost and grown at 25 C and a 15-h photoperiod. Plants were watered with tap water. When seedlings were 40 days old (two-leaf stage), they were transplanted to 9-cm diameter plastic pots (one seedling per pot) filled with the same compost. Tomato seedlings were grown under the same conditions as tobacco and they were transplanted at 10 days from germination. For inoculation, plants in pots were watered to saturation and two holes were made in the soil around the stem of each plant. Then 10 ml of inoculum was poured into each hole (20 ml per pot). Control plants received the same amount of blended CMA medium. Seven plants of tobacco and an equal number of tomato were inoculated with each Phytophthora strain 5 days after transplantation and seven uninoculated plants served as controls. The number of diseased plants was recorded every 3 days from day 3 to day 15 after inoculation. Five tobacco cultivars, BX 2a (Oriental aromatic), B 21E (Burley), S 53 (Oriental flavour), VE 9 (Greek Virginia) and KP 14/a (Oriental neutral), obtained from the Tobacco Institute, were assessed for their susceptibility to two pathogenic isolates of P. nicotianae, BPIC 1142 and BPIC 1921. These cultivars are the most commonly grown in Greece. Similarly, two tomato commercial cultivars, Early Pak and Tondino, were assessed for their susceptibility to P. nicotianae isolates BPIC 1932 and BPIC 1933. Tobacco and tomato cultivars were grown and inoculated as described above for the pathogenicity tests. Disease reactions were scored on a 0-5 scale, where 0 indicated no symptoms on the aerial parts and roots, and 5 indicated a plant killed by the pathogen 15 days after inoculation (Carlson et al, 1997). Seven plants per cultivar were inoculated and placed in a randomized block design. Data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance. Treatment means were compared with Duncan s multiple range test. Experiments were repeated two times for the 246 Phytopathologia Mediterranea

Pathogenicity of Phytophthora nicotianae pathogenicity tests, and once to determine the susceptibility of tobacco and tomato cultivars. Results and discussion The symptoms on inoculated tobacco and tomato plants consisted of necrosis of stem tissue starting 3 to 6 days after inoculation. P. nicotianae isolates from tobacco infected the collar region and stems of tobacco plants giving rise to characteristic rot which spread up to the leaves. The lower stem tissues were always colonized by the pathogen. The roots showed a high level of infection but plants that did not exhibit root necrosis did not exhibit aboveground symptoms either. Seven isolates from different non-tobacco hosts colonized the tobacco stem producing some necrosis but not black shank, and the plants survived the infection. On tomato, pathogenic isolates from tomato caused stem shrivelling, the leaves wilted and plants died. Data in Table 1 Table 1. Response of tobacco and tomato to inoculation with Phytophthora nicotianae isolates collected from 1929 to 1997. Strain Host Year of isolation Response to inoculation Tobacco Tomato cv. BX 2a cv. Early Pak BPIC 1142 a Nicotiana tabacum before 1970 + c - BPIC 1143 Pistacia vera 1979 - d + BPIC 1144 Citrus deliciosa 1982 - - BPIC 1206 a Nicotiana tabacum before 1970 + - BPIC 1207 a Nicotiana tabacum before 1970 - - BPIC 1208 a Nicotiana tabacum before 1970 + - BPIC 1209 b Nicotiana tabacum 1929 + - BPIC 1210 Dianthus caryophyllus 1972 - - BPIC 1211 Lycopersicon esculentum 1964 - - BPIC 1212 Lycopersicon esculentum 1964 - - BPIC 1238 Dianthus caryophyllus 1975 - - BPIC 1239 Dianthus caryophyllus 1974 - - BPIC 1241 Dianthus caryophyllus 1976 - + BPIC 1242 Lycopersicon esculentum before 1980 - - BPIC 1243 Lycopersicon esculentum 1966 - - BPIC 1244 Lycopersicon esculentum 1966 - + BPIC 1245 Lycopersicon esculentum 1966 - - BPIC 1246 Lycopersicon esculentum 1976 - + BPIC 1247 Lycopersicon esculentum before 1980 - - BPIC 1248 Lycopersicon esculentum 1976 - + BPIC 1249 Lycopersicon esculentum 1974 - + BPIC 1250 Lycopersicon esculentum 1975 - + BPIC 1251 Lycopersicon esculentum 1974 - - BPIC 1252 Lycopersicon esculentum 1978 - + BPIC 1253 Lycopersicon esculentum 1978 - + BPIC 1254 Cyclamen sp. 1962 - - BPIC 1255 Cyclamen sp. 1974 ± e - BPIC 1256 Cyclamen sp. before 1980 - - BPIC 1258 Pistacia vera 1975 - - BPIC 1259 Pistacia vera 1973 - - BPIC 1261 Citrus limon 1979 - - BPIC 1262 Citrus sinensis 1971 - - BPIC 1263 Citrus limon before 1980 - - BPIC 1264 Citrus sinensis 1976 - - BPIC 1265 Rosmarinus officinalis 1973 - - BPIC 1266 Rosmarinus officinalis 1974 - - (continued) Vol. 39, No. 2, August 2000 247

K. Elena Table 1. (Continued) Strain Host Year of isolation Response to inoculation Tobacco Tomato cv. BX 2a cv. Early Pak BPIC 1267 Primula sp. before 1980 - + BPIC 1268 Cactaceae 1973 - - BPIC 1269 Suculent plant 1975 ± + BPIC 1270 Gerbera sp. 1976 - - BPIC 1271 Lavandula sp. 1973 - - BPIC 1272 Lavandula sp. 1974 - + BPIC 1273 Hedera helix before 1980 - + BPIC 1274 Gloxinia sp. 1974 ± - BPIC 1275 Aralia elegantissima 1974 ± + BPIC 1276 Saintpaulia ionata 1977 ± - BPIC 1277 Saintpaulia ionata 1976 - - BPIC 1278 Solanum melongena n.a. - + BPIC 1279 Cyclamen sp. 1977 - - BPIC 1280 Salvia sp. 1978 - ± BPIC 1281 Anthurium sp. 1980 - ± BPIC 1282 Musa carendishii 1977 - - BPIC 1919 Dianthus caryophyllus 1996 - - BPIC 1920 Lycopersicon esculentum 1996 - + BPIC 1921 Nicotiana tabacum 1996 + - BPIC 1922 Lycopersicon esculentum 1996 - + BPIC 1932 Lycopersicon esculentum 1997 ± + BPIC 1933 Lycopersicon esculentum 1997 - + BPIC 1926 Nicotiana tabacum 1996 + ± BPIC 1937 Nicotiana tabacum 1997 + ± BPIC 1938 Saintpaulia ionata 1997 ± ± Control - - a From J.L. Apple, USA. b From Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands (CBS 303.29) isolated by L.H. Leonian. c Pathogenic. d Non pathogenic. e The fungus colonizes the plants without disease symptoms. n.a., not available indicate that all isolates of P. nicotianae from tobacco except one were pathogenic to tobacco, but none of these was also pathogenic to tomato. Nineteen out of the 61 P. nicotianae isolates proved highly virulent to tomato. These tomato-virulent isolates were mainly from tomato. Five other isolates not from tomato colonized the tomato stem but without causing disease symptoms. No isolate was pathogenic to both tobacco and tomato alike (Table 1). Mortality in tobacco plants occurred somewhat later than in infected tomato plants, and some isolates caused disease symptoms more quickly than others. No disease symptoms were noted in the control plants. The incidence of wilting plants was recorded and isolations were made from selected diseased plants. The five tobacco cultivars tested varied in their reaction to P. nicotianae isolate BPIC 1921, but they were equally susceptible to BPIC 1142 (Table 2). Tobacco cultivars BX 2a and KP 14/a were more susceptible than cultivars S 53, VE 9 and B 21E to isolate BPIC 1921. The cultivar BX 2a is also susceptible in field conditions in Greece. Results of inoculation of tomato cultivars indicated a change in ranking of susceptibility depending upon the isolates inoculated. The cv. Early Pak was more susceptible than cv. Tondino to isolate BPIC 1932, but less susceptible than 248 Phytopathologia Mediterranea

Pathogenicity of Phytophthora nicotianae Table 2. Disease severity recorded on five tobacco cultivars inoculated with Phytophthora nicotianae isolates. Cultivar Disease severity a BPIC 1142 BPIC 1921 BX 2a 2.4 a b 4.3 a KP 14/a 1.7 a 2.7 a S 53 1.6 a 0.8 b VE 9 1.4 a 0.7 b B 21E 3.3 a 0.4 b a b Disease severity was assessed on a 0-5 scale where 0=healthy plant and 5=plant killed. Average of seven plants. Means were compare according to Duncan s multiple range test. Numbers followed by different letters differ significantly at P<0.05. Table 3. Disease severity recorded on two tomato cultivars inoculated with Phytophthora nicotianae isolates. Cultivar Disease severity a BPIC 1932 BPIC 1933 Early Pak 4.71 a b 2.14 b Tondino 2.57 b 5 a Footnotes see Table 2. this cv. to opposite occurred with isolate BPIC 1933 (Table 3). Our results showed that isolates of P. nicotianae from tobacco caused typical black-shank disease symptoms only on tobacco. This agrees with the concept generally held that the black-shank isolates of P. nicotianae are a separate group with specific pathogenicity to tobacco plants only. Only one isolate from tobacco failed to cause disease on tobacco in the pathogenicity tests. In our study, only 19 of 61 isolates from tomato and non-tobacco hosts were pathogenic to tomato. Isolates from tobacco did not cause infection on tomato but two of them colonized the tomato stem. Five isolates from tomato failed to cause disease on tomato hosts. According to Hall (1993) the loss of pathogenic properties is probably due to repeated subculture for storage, but our results indicated that the strain BPIC 1244 was pathogenic to tomato after 32 years, and strain BPIC 1209, isolated by Leonian (CBS 303.29) was pathogenic to tobacco after 70 years, as reported by Hall (1993). Literature cited Carlson S.R., M.F. Wolff, H.D. Shew and E. Wernsman, 1997. Inheritance of resistance to race 0 of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae from the flue-cured tobacco cultivar Coker 371-Gold. Plant Disease, 81, 1269-1274. Colas V., I. Lacourt, P. Ricci, F. Vanlerberghe-Masutti, P. Venard, A. Poupet and F. Panabieres, 1998. Diversity of virulence in Phytophthora parasitica on tobacco, as reflected by nuclear RFLPs. Phytopathology, 88, 205-212. Fletcher J.T., 1989. Diseases of greenhouse plants. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, NY, USA, 351 pp. Hall G., 1993. An integrated approach to the analysis of variation in Phytophthora nicotianae and a redescription of the species. Mycological Research, 97, 559-574. Ho H.H. and S.C. Jong, 1989. Phytophthora nicotianae (P. parasitica). Mycotaxon, 35(2), 243-276. Lucas G.B., 1965. Diseases of tobacco. Second edition. The Scarecrow Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 778 pp. Ricci P., F. Trentin, P. Bonnet, P. Venard, F. Mouton-Perronnet and M. Bruneteau, 1992. Differential production of parasiticein, an elicitor of necrosis and resistance in tobacco, by isolates of Phytophthora parasitica. Plant Pathology, 41, 298-307. Vol. 39, No. 2, August 2000 249

K. Elena Sarejanni J.A. et N. Stamatini, 1935. Le Phytophthora du tabac en Grèce. Annales Institut Phytopathologique Benaki, Année 1(2), 51-56. Sherf A.F. and A.A. Macnab, 1986. Vegetable diseases and their control. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 728 pp. Shew H.D., 1987. Effect of host resistance on spread of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae and subsequent development of tobacco black shank under field conditions. Phytopathology, 77, 1090-1093. Shew H.D., 1991. Black shank. In: Compendium of Tobacco Diseases (H.D. Shew, G.B. Lucas, eds), APS, St. Paul, MN, USA, 17-20. Stevenson W.R., 1991. Buckeye rot and Phytophthora root rot. In: Compendium of Tomato Diseases (Jones et al., eds), APS, St. Paul, MN, USA, 11-12. Accepted for publication: January 24, 2000 250 Phytopathologia Mediterranea