Trial was funded by Sow True Seeds and Twin Oaks Seed Farm, with help from Organic Seed Alliance.

Similar documents
Organic Seed Partnership

Important Terminology Open-pollinated seeds Heirloom seeds Hybrid seeds Variety trial Breeding trial Selection trial Traditional plant breeding

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Pickling Cucumbers. EVO PDF Tools Demo. Page 1 of 10 L CTRONIC CATALOG. CU1 20 Addis Cucumbers. CU82 20 A & C Pickling Cucumbers

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

2018 Small Fruit Plant Sale Variety Information

1

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Quality of western Canadian peas 2009

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Growing cucumbers in high tunnels

Today s Plan. Successful Squash! Wonderful Watermelons! Cool Cucurbits!

Working With Your Environment. Phenotype = Genotype x Environment

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

RUST RESISTANCE IN WILD HELIANTHUS ANNUUS AND VARIATION BY GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

High Yield, Long Storage.The Golden Combination!

Cucumbers SEASONAL AVAILABILITY

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2009

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Estimating and Adjusting Crop Weight in Finger Lakes Vineyards

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Small Fruit. Less successful. Successful in Montana. Refers not just to the size of the fruit, but rather the size of the plant.

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

western Canadian pulse crops 2005

Table of Contents BLUEBERRIES... 1 EARLY-SEASON... 4 MID-SEASON... 3 LATE-SEASON... 4 BLACKBERRIES... 4

TIFTON PECAN TRIAL UPDATE. Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia Tifton Campus

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Blackberry Growth Cycle and New Varieties from the University of Arkansas. Alejandra A. Salgado and John R. Clark March 13 th, 2015 Virginia

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2011

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Haskap: The shape of things to come? by Dr. Bob Bors

a rare and precious vintage in Bourgogne

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Challenges facing coffee production

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

Title: Plum / Roma Tomato Variety Trial 2014 (year 2 of 2) Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing Research Program

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

GRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE

THOUSAND CANKERS DISEASE AND WALNUT TWIG BEETLE IN A THREE YEAR OLD ORCHARD, SOLANO COUNTY

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

FRUIT TREES/SHRUBS 2014

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Determining the Optimum Time to Pick Gwen

Pollinating almonds: how many bees do you need?

Growing Strawberries in a Community Garden. Peter Nitzsche County Agent Cooperative Extension of Morris County

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Crop Reports by Hal Kneen and Brad Bergefurd

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Low Tunnel Spinach Variety Trial photos to accompany research report

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

Malting barley prices Basis FOB Swedish /Danish Port Oct 14/15/16/17/18

Transcription:

Twin Oaks Seed Farm, Louisa, VA Twinoaks.org/seeds Edmund@twinoaks.org 2013 Downy Mildew Cucumber Trial Report By Edmund Frost Trial was funded by Sow True Seeds and Twin Oaks Seed Farm, with help from Organic Seed Alliance. Introduction: Downy Mildew pressure was extremely high in Central Virginia in 2013. We had already observed it on other cucurbit crops at our farm by June 20 th more than two weeks before planting the cucumber trial on July 5 th. A combination of very wet weather and a predominance of south wind probably contributed to early arrival of the disease (which overwinters in Florida and blows north on the wind each year), as well as to its proliferation. We planted the trial late in order to maximize exposure to Downy Mildew. It has been our experience that late planted cucumber crops are often unproductive due to Downy Mildew, and this was especially true this year for most of the varieties we trialed. We planted 36 cucumber varieties, from a variety of sources: Southern Exposure Seed Exchange, Sow True Seeds, High Mowing, Johnny s, Cornell University, USDA Plant Introductions program, Territorial Seeds, Fedco, Heavenly Seeds, Adaptive Seeds, and Twin Oaks Seed Farm. Of these, only four produced well: Suyo Long (Twin Oaks), Shantung Shuyo F1 (Fedco), Ivory Queen F1 (Cornell) and Green DMR (Cornell). 10 varieties did not produce at all, and one produced very poorly. Five varieties had insufficient stands (see below about Green DMR and Ivory Queen). 16 varieties produced poorly to moderately. We also observed and rated Downy Mildew pressure on the leaves 6 times during the trial. The average of these ratings for each variety generally correlates with yields. We rated flavor on one occasion, and attempted to identify maximum harvestable size for best eating quality. It was difficult to discern differences in flavor. This may have to do with the abundance of rainfall. The only seedstock with bitterness present was Plant Introduction 197088, which is not a variety but a breeding source. The criteria for flavor ratings were sweetness, lack of bitterness and lack of sourness. Several varieties tended to have cucumber beetle damage on the fruit: Tendergreen Burpless, Diva, Mideast Peace and Muncher. See Additional Notes section for more information about flavor, shape and other qualities. Problems: There were two major problems with the trial. 1)Plant emergence of some varieties was not good due to heavy rainfall after planting, resulting in poor stands of those varieties. The intention was to have 10 plants of each variety. 7 varieties had 6 or fewer plants, complicating yield comparisons between these varieties and others. It could be wise to disregard the yield data from these varieties. However, in the cases of Ivory Queen and Green DMR, which (even 1

with fewer plants) yielded 3 and 5 times the average production in the trial and which far out-produced everything except Suyo Long and Shantung Shuyo F1, valid conclusions can be drawn about comparative productivity. I have removed the other 5 varieties (with poor stands) from the data analysis and spreadsheet. Stand density is a common problem with cucumber trials. See Stand Correction Methods for Cucumber Fruit Yield http://cuke.hort.ncsu.edu/cgc/cgc21/cgc21-7.html 2)Harvest size was not set ahead of time. The trial evaluated several different types of cucumbers that have a wide variation of optimal and intended harvest sizes. This was further complicated by the fact that many varieties, under conditons of stress from DM pressure, began ripening or fattening fruits at smaller than normal size. Harvest size was guided by a qualitative evaluation of good eating size for each variety. The results of the trial must be considered with these problems in mind. They make yield comparisons between the varieties difficult. However, there are valuable conclusions to be drawn from the trial. It could be several years before another year of such high Downy Mildew pressure, so it is important not to pass up the opportunity to do so. There are three ways that significance can be found in the results in the face of these problems: 1)Downy Mildew ratings often corresponded to yields. 2)Number of fruits produced can be used along with yield to rank variety productivity, addressing the problem of different harvest sizes when comparing productivity. 3)It is possible to isolate the best performers and the failures in the trial. Differences between varieties in the middle are harder to ascertain, but may also be possible to some extent. Conclusions: -The eleven worst performers by yield are also the worst performers by observed Downy Mildew Resistance and number of fruits. Of these, 3 were listed as DM resistant, and should be de-listed. This includes Spacemaker 80 and two seedstocks of Arkansas Little Leaf H-19. -The top four performers by yield and by fruits per plant (Suyo Long, Shantung Shuyo F1, Ivory Queen F1 and Green DMR) are also in the top 5 for DM resistance evaluation (along with PI29088). Green DMR, Suyo Long and Shantung Shuyo are the top 3 for number of fruit. Ivory Queen, which only had three plants, is seventh for number of fruits, but had the second highest number of fruits per plant (15.3), which is 50% higher than the third highest (Suyo Long at 10 fruits per plant). These varieties yielded 70%-289% higher than the next highest yielder (Ashley). The fruit of these varieties was of good quality (unaffected by Downy Mildew stress). They were clearly the most productive and DM resistant, and yielded well. -More research is needed to assess the DM resistance of the 16 varieties that were not clear failures or clear successes. It is clear that none of these varieties are good producers in cases of extremely high DM pressure. It may be possible to make some distinctions within this group based on yields and number of 2

fruit. The top six producers in the group based on both yield and number of fruit (Ashley, Mideast Peace, Muncher, Platinum, Salt and Pepper and PI 197088) have at least double the yield and number of fruit compared to the lowest 5 producers in the group (Calypso F1, Marketmore 97, Diva, Sumter and MM80BW). These 5 lower producing varieties are all listed as DM resistant. This trial calls the DM listings into question. There is also an issue of marketability of fruit. Many of the slicers in the group had a tendency to produce deformed fruit, with pointy ends, bottlenecks, or fruit that fattened at a small size. This includes Green Finger, General Lee, MM80BW, Sumter, Marketmore 97, Marketmore 76, Muncher, Diva and Mideast Peace. Platinum, Homemade Pickles, Salt and Pepper, Poinsett 76 and Ashley produced better quality fruit. -More research is also needed to assess the varieties with insufficient stands (besides Green DMR and Ivory Queen), although Metze White and Boston performed so poorly that they could be grouped with the 11 failing varieties. -The worst performing 19 varieties by yield are also the worst performers by number of fruits. Of these, 11 were listed as DM resistant. Methods: 36 varieties of cucumbers were planted on July 5 th, 2013. We mainly selected varieties that are listed as Downy Mildew resistant, plus some that are regionally popular. Four varieties were hybrids and 32 were open pollinated. Seeds were planted 10 inches apart in stations 10 stations per seedstock; 25 inches between varieties. We planted 3 seeds per station, except where seed supply was limited, in which case we planted 2 per station. Seed emergence evaluation was not one of the goals of the trial. Due to several days of heavy rain just after planting, emergence of some varieties was poor. Plants were thinned on 7/22 to 1 per station. Two plants were left in stations next to gaps. See Spreadsheet Notes section for more details. There were two rows planted 6 feet apart. 5-10 feet at the ends of each row were planted with Ashley cucumber (these plantings not rated in the trial) to avoid edge effect. The trial took place in LB1 field at Twin Oaks Seed Farm, which is certified organic. Soil type is Alta Vista Sandy Loam. Fertility was based on a soil test from A and L Eastern Labs. Amendments used were tofu okara (for nitrogen), at a rate of one ton per acre side dressed on August 8 th. An over-wintered Crimson Clover cover crop was the main source of nitrogen. Potassium was supplied with an application of Potassium Sulfate at a rate of 400 pounds per acre. Phosphorus levels in the soil are very high, and ph is 6.4. Plants were covered with row cover until 7/22 to prevent plant mortality from cucumber beetles. Weed control was accomplished by hoeing in-row, hand weeding (once around plants), and tractor cultivation. 3

Downy Mildew pressure on leaves was observed and rated six times during the trial (from 7/28-9/24), using a 1-9 rating system (9 being the highest DM presence, and 1 indicating no DM presence). Harvest took place on 12 dates between 8/20 and 10/06. Spreadsheet Notes: AvgDMRrating = Average Downy Mildew resistance rating. 1 is most resistant. DMR List: This column indicates whether varieties/seedstocks were listed as Downy Mildew resistant. Per acre yield: Each variety had approximately 57.5 square feet. Yield per acre is calculated as follows: (43560/57.5)*yield. Taste Ratings are from 9/3 harvest. See Summary and Additional Notes sections for more information about taste and other qualitative fruit characteristics. MaxGoodSize: Maximum size for good eating. Not determined for all varieties. Based on 9/3 and 9/14 harvests. Number of plants: There were emergence problems due to prolonged wet weather after planting. The goal was to have 10 plants per variety; the figure in this column is the actual number of plants as of July 28 th. Five varieties have been left out of the data analysis due to poor stands. These are listed separately at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Overall Ratings: A=Top rated for yield, DM evaluation and number of fruits. Green DMR, Suyo Long, Shantung Shuyo F1, Ivory Queen F1. B=Middle Rating (16 varieties). B1 group, likely better than B3 group. Number of fruits and yield are at least double B3 group. Ashley, Muncher, Mideast Peace, Platinum, Salt and Pepper, PI 197088. B2 group: a clear distinction may not be made compared to B1 or B3 groups. General Lee, Homemade Pickles, Poinsett 76, Marketmore 76 and Green Finger. B3 group, likely worse than B1 group. Number of fruits and yield are less than half of B1 group. Diva, Calypso F1, Marketmore 97, Sumter, MM80BW. F=Failed plantings, worst performance based on all criteria (10 of these produced no fruit). Richmond Green Apple, Ellen s Famiy White, Edmondson, Straight 8s, Spacemaster, Armenian, Spacemaker 80, Arkansas Little Leaf H-19 (SESE and Sow True seedstocks), Bush Pickle, White Wonder. 4

Additional Notes: The following notes were taken on 9/3: Ivory Queen: Seeds small in bigger cukes. Good flavor, hint of sweetness. Suyo Long: Good flavor, some sweetness, berry-like flavor. Necks make good pickles. Lighter color than Shantung Shuyo Ashley: Decent flavor, thick skin Shantung Shuyo: Decent/good flavor. Necks make good pickles. DMR PI 197088: Bitter. Green Finger: Good flavor, some sweetness. Salt and Pepper: Good/decent flavor, some sweetness. Platinum: Good/decent flavor, some sweetness. General Lee: Thicker skin, mild taste. Green DMR: OK taste, mild, some sourness detected. Tendency to have hollow or triangulated middle. Tendergreen Burpless: Decent/good flavor, not real sweet. Scabbing from cucumber beetles. Sumter: Off flavor? Mideast Peace: Crisp for a slicer, decent/good flavor. Scabbing from cucumber beetles. Marketmore 97: Decent/good flavor. Boston: Mild, decent/good flavor. Muncher: Flavor OK, mild. Thicker skin. Scabbing from cucumber beetles. Bulb end fattening early. Homemade Pickles: Decent flavor, mild, slightly thick skin for a pickler. Marketmore 76: Flavor decent/good. Thin skin for a slicer. Poinsett 76: Flavor decent, not so sweet. Diva (9/14): Sweeter than Muncher. Cucumber beetle scabbing damage. Green Finger (9/14): Pointy ends. Green Finger (9/6): Lots of bottlenecks. DMR PI 197088: Two plants dead as of 8/12 from what appears to be bacterial wilt. Sent in disease sample and it came back as insufficient sample. One more died a little later. Plants that had lower vigor (observed on 8/12 and 8/28) apart from an appearance of Downy Mildew pressure: Marketmore 80 (SESE), Poinsett 76, Tendergreen Burpless, Diva, Wautoma. The presence of Downy Mildew was confirmed on 8/2 by Virginia Tech Plant Disease Clinic, on a sample of Edmondson cucumber plant. 5

Variety, Source, and Lot# (if applicable) Avg. DMR Rating Total Yield Yield Percentile # of fruits Fruits Per Plant avg. fruit DMR list? Lbs. per Acre Taste Rating Max Good Size # of Plants Rating Ivory Queen (Cornell) 3.0 27.08 0.59 46 15.3 0.59 yes 20516 3 >.4 3 A Suyo Long (Twin Oaks) 2011 Stock 2.8 46.06 1.00 70 10.0 0.66 no 34895 3 1 7 A Ashley (Twin Oaks) 2011 Stock 4.7 15.94 0.35 42 4.7 0.38 yes 12076 5 0.6 9 B1 Shantung Shuyo F1 (Fedco) 341 3.5 42.32 0.92 71 8.9 0.60 yes 32062 4 1 8 A DMR PI 197088 (Cornell) NY11-5202-2 3.0 11.08 0.24 36 5.1 0.31 yes 8394 9 7 B1 Richmond Grn Apple (SESE) AA043 7.1 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F Green Finger (Cornell) NY10-603B 5.3 8.32 0.18 33 3.7 0.25 yes 6303 3 0.2 9 B2 Ellen's Family White (SESE) 5622 8.2 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F Salt and Pepper (Cornell) NY09-176 5.8 8.54 0.19 52 6.5 0.16 yes 6470 4 0.2 8 B2 Edmondson (SESE) 8399 7.3 0.50 0.01 3 0.4 0.17 no 379 8 F Platinum (Cornell) NY10-604 5.2 9.16 0.20 49 4.9 0.19 yes 6940 3.5 0.2 10 B1 General Lee F1 (Fedco) 351 5.0 9.21 0.20 33 3.7 0.28 yes 6977 4.5 9 B2 MM80 BW (Cornell) NY11-193 5.7 2.42 0.05 13 1.4 0.19 yes 1833 4 9 B3 Straight 8s (SESE) AA564 7.7 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F Spacemaster (SESE) AA562 8.2 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F Green DMR (Cornell) NY12-264 1.3 39.99 0.87 96 19.2 0.42 yes 30296 5 >.4 5 A Armenian (Sow True) 12-2 8.0 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F Spacemaker 80 (Heavenly) 8.0 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 yes 0 9 F Sumter (Heavenly) 6.8 3.06 0.07 17 1.7 0.18 yes 2318 6 10 B3 Mideast Peace (Adaptive) 4.7 11.52 0.25 47 5.9 0.25 no 8728 4 >.2 8 B1 Marketmore 97 (Territorial) CU292/L 5.5 3.02 0.07 16 1.8 0.19 yes 2288 4 >.26 9 B3 Diva (Johnnys) 38238 5.0 3.12 0.07 11 1.4 0.28 yes 2364 0.4 8 B3 Muncher (Sow True) 12-4 4.3 9.14 0.20 35 3.9 0.26 no 6924 5 0.35 9 B1 Calypso F1 (High Mowing) TER17-25 6.5 2.43 0.05 19 2.4 0.13 yes 1841 8 B2 Bush Pickle (Sow True) 6-3 8.3 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 10 F AR Little Leaf H19 (SESE) AA124 7.7 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 yes 0 10 F AR Little Leaf H19 (Sow True) 20-1 7.7 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 yes 0 10 F White Wonder (SESE) AA616 8.7 0.00 0.00 0 0.0 no 0 9 F Homemade Pickles (SESE) AA944 5.6 5.58 0.12 30 3.0 0.19 yes 4227 4.5 0.2 10 B2 Marketmore 76 (SESE) AA348 4.6 4.46 0.10 17 1.7 0.26 yes 3379 4 10 B3 Poinsett 76 (SESE) AA262 4.8 7.75 0.17 26 3.7 0.30 yes 5871 5 0.3 7 B2 AVERAGE 5.8 8.73 6616 INSUFFICIENT STANDS: Metze White (R. Winn) 7.6 0.15 0.00 2 0.5 0.08 no 4 Tendergreen Burpless (Heavenly) 4.1 7.39 0.16 29 4.8 0.25 yes 4 6 Wautoma (Territorial) CU299/L 5.6 1.53 0.03 5 2.5 0.31 yes 2 Boston (Sow True) 13-3 7.2 0.58 0.01 4 0.7 0.15 no 4 6 Marketmore 80 (SESE) 5.7 1.82 0.04 7 1.8 0.26 yes 4 6