Etiology, Epidemiology, and Management of Lower Limb Dieback and Band Canker of Almonds

Similar documents
WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Canker Diseases of Almond. December 10, 2015

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Diagnosis of Wood Canker Causing Pathogens in Dried Plum

Canker Diseases in California Lodi Grape Day 2017 W. D. GUBLER DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, CA 95616

Botryosphaeria, Phomopsis and Anthracnose Management in Walnuts

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING XANTHOMONAS JUGLANDIS BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Aflatoxin and its Control in Pistachios

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

Common Issues in the Orchard. Bob Curtis, Moderator

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Topics to be covered: What Causes Fruit to Rot? Powdery Mildew. Black Rot. Black Rot (Continued)

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

Understanding and Managing Walnut Botryosphaeria/Phomopsis Canker and Blights (Influence of El Niño on the Sleeping Giant)

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Sacramento Valley Walnut News

Diseases, pests, and emerging issues affecting the health of Pacific madrone. Marianne Elliott Plant Pathologist WSU Puyallup

Pruning and Training Young Walnuts Bruce Lampinen UC Davis Plant Sciences

Themis J. Michailides received his M.S. degree in irrigations from the University of Athens, Greece, and his M.S. and Ph. D.

EVALUATION OF WILD JUGLANS SPECIES FOR CROWN GALL RESISTANCE

GROWTH RATES OF RIPE ROT FUNGI AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

THOUSAND CANKERS DISEASE AND WALNUT TWIG BEETLE IN A THREE YEAR OLD ORCHARD, SOLANO COUNTY

THOUSAND CANKERS DISEASE of WALNUT: STATUS in CALIFORNIA

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 August 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station

Disease updates on Botryosphaeria (Bot)/Phomopsis, Anthracnose & Walnut Blight

Pomegranate Diseases: What do we know and where are we heading? Achala KC and Gary Vallad FPA Grower s Meeting Wimauma, FL 03/04/2016

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR NUTRIENT SAMPLING IN STONE FRUIT TREES

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Project Justification: Objectives: Accomplishments:

MANAGING BOTRYOSPHAERIA/PHOMOPSIS CANKERS AND ANTHRACNOSE BLIGHT OF WALNUT IN CALIFORNIA

Management of Hull Rot in Almond

Plane Tree Anthracnose (Gnomonia Veneta)

Rhonda Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County

Botryosphaeriaceae and Phomopsis/Diaporthe (P/D) spp. are fungal

Sacramento Valley Almond News

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

University of California Center, 550 E. Shaw Ave., Suite 210, Fresno, 93710, CA

Cankers. FRST 307 Fall 2017

Almond & Walnut Harvest Evaluation: Identifying Sources of Damage

Identification of Grapevine Trunk Diseases in Virginia and Implementation of Control Strategies.

Arthropod Management in California Blueberries. David Haviland and Stephanie Rill UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co. Blueberry Field Day 20 May 2009

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES

Chemical Control of Avocado Root Rot and Stem Canker

FALL TO WINTER CRANBERRY PLANT HARDINESS

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Prepared by Louise Ferguson, Mark Bell, Mark Henderson

Plants in the Apiaceae (parsley family)

Fungal Fungal Disease Citrus Black Black Spot Guignardia Guignardia citricarpa ): Id I entifi f catio ion io, Biology Biology and and Control

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Aftermath of the 2007 Easter Freeze: Muscadine Damage Report. Connie Fisk, Muscadine Extension Associate Department of Horticultural Science, NCSU

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF CANKER DISEASES IN ALMONDS

Diagnosis and detection of fungi occurring on grapevines in Australia 8th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2003

2012 BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA & ESSEX AREA VINEYARDS

Peach and Nectarine Cork Spot: A Review of the 1998 Season

viti-notes [pests and diseases] Eutypa dieback

Psa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards an observation by Callum Kay, 4 April 2011

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Peanut disease photos

Trials, Tribulations, And Thoughts On Nebraska s Hazelnut Cultivar Trial ~ An Update On The Hazelnut Consortium

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

William J. Stambaugh and Bruce L. Nash

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 3 August 2015 Columbia, MO

Pecan Production 101: Sunlight, Crop Load Management, Pollination. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Thyronectria Canker Caused by: Hosts: Symptoms: Prognosis: Management: Prevention: Other information:

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois Tree Fruit Schools 2,3 February 2016

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

2013 Bacterial Spot on Almond Field Day. Sponsored by the University of California Cooperative Extension. -- 9:00-11:00 a.m.

Thousand Cankers Disease vs. Shallow Bark Canker Seasonal Activity of Walnut Twig Beetle in the southern San Joaquin Valley

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Project Concluding: Summary Report Mandarin Trial for the California Desert

Visit to Chile to assess impacts of Psa-V, and to better coordinate research efforts

Sacramento Valley Walnut News

2015 BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA AREA VINEYARDS

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 11 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Further investigations into the rind lesion problems experienced with the Pinkerton cultivar

Growing Healthy Christmas Trees

Reevaluation of Phomopsis species affecting sunflowers in the United States

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Walnut Blight. Luke K. Milliron UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor Butte, Tehama, and Glenn Counties. November 7, 2018 UC Walnut Short Course

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Orchard Topics. In This Issue: Cooperative Extension, Colusa County. Walnut Husk Fly Field Meeting Monitoring, New Control Methods, Impact on Quality

Disease management update for muscadines in the Southeast

Managing Trunk Diseases of Grapevine

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

GRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

PREDICTING AVOCADO FRUIT ROTS BY QUANTIFYING INOCU- LUM POTENTIAL IN THE ORCHARD BEFORE HARVEST

Transcription:

Etiology, Epidemiology, and Management of Lower Limb Dieback and Band Canker of Almonds Project No.: Project Leader: 8-PATH5-Michailides Themis J. Michailides UC Kearney Agricultural Center 924 South Riverbend Ave. Parlier, CA 93648 (559) 646-6546 fax: (559) 646-6593 e-mail: themis@uckac.edu Project Cooperators and Personnel: D. Morgan, P. Interbitzin, B. Lampinen, H. Reyes, R. Puckett, J. Windh, J. Connell, R. Duncan, B. Holtz, J. Adaskaveg, J. Edstrom, B. Krueger, M. Viveros, P. Verdegaal, G. Browne, D. McCoy, B. Puget, and J. Post Objectives: Lower Limb Dieback (LLDB) 1. Select four orchards with a history of LLDB and make isolations periodically starting in March until October/November to determine the succession of colonization by fungi. 2. Repeat an inoculation study using more isolates of Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis spp. and compare symptoms with those of naturally occurring LLDB symptoms in the field. 3. Initiate herbicide experiment to determine if glyphosate application in almond orchards contributes to LLDB symptom development. Band Canker 4. Determine when infection by B. dothidea of almond occurs (second year experiment using the spore dispersal wooden construction). Lower Limb Dieback (LLDB) and Band Canker 5. Identify and determine species compositions of Botryosphaeria found in association with band canker, LLDB, cankers in the canopy, and fruit blights of almond. 6. Determine any differences of the Phomopsis and Botryosphaeria species in regards to virulence towards almond trees. Almond Board of California - 1-28 - 29 Final Research Report

Interpretive Summary: Isolations from limbs of trees with symptoms of LLDB and without symptoms again revealed both Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis species. The frequency of these fungi increased later in the season and in general it was higher in limbs with LLDB symptoms than in limbs without symptoms. B. dothidea and Phomopsis spp. were also recovered to some extend from symptomless limbs, suggesting that these fungi can live in the almond bark, waiting to initiate disease with the right conditions. An experiment to study the effect of glyphosate drift as a cause of LLDB is being initiated but no results are available yet. At least five species were identified hidden within the Botryosphaeria dothidea complex from almond. These are B. dothidea, Neofusicoccum mediterraneum, B. parva, as well as B. cf parva and B. cf arbuti. All species isolated from canopy cankers are also present in band cankers, suggesting that canopy cankers can be caused from band canker inoculum. In addition, the species recovered from band canker of almond are present on other hosts that can serve as additional inoculum sources for the almond band canker disease. The experiment to determine when infections by Botryosphaeria dothidea occur is still in progress. No band canker disease has developed yet in potted trees exposed periodically under B. dothidea spore inoculum probably because of the very unfavorable long drought conditions. Inoculation studies of Carmel almond trees to compare the virulence of the five species of Botryosphaeria encountered on almond showed that B. parva was the most virulent species followed by N. mediterraneum and B. cf parva in causing cankers. Materials and Methods: Lower Limb Dieback 1. Select orchards with a history of LLDB and make isolations periodically to determine the succession of colonization by fungi (Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis). Six orchards with LLDB were selected; 3 each in Stanislaus and Butte counties and trees with early symptoms of LLDB were selected. Five of these were orchards where Dr. Lampinen was doing measurements of the water/moisture content in the soil. We collected samples for isolations from these trees and will continue isolating from the same trees from limbs with LLDB until October/November. Collected samples were brought to the laboratory and isolations were made within 1 to 2 days on agar media. The goal of these isolations was to determine if there was a succession and/or an increase of colonization of the LLDB limbs with Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis. It has been documented in published research that stressed plants are predisposed to infection by Botryosphaeria spp. Figure 1 shows the isolation results from symptomatic and symptomless limbs for these orchards. Almond Board of California - 2-28 - 29 Final Research Report

2. Determine whether B. dothidea and Phomopsis spp. can cause LLDB symptoms in the field. Inoculations were repeated in a Nonpareil almond orchard at the Nickels Soil Lab Estates orchard in 28. Three limbs in each of 1 trees were selected and inoculated with three Botryosphaeria and three Phomopsis isolates on 2 July 28 (Table 1). We inoculated various ages of wood; thus the inoculations were done using mycelial plugs in one year-old wood and wood formed in past years as well. Inoculated wounds were wrapped with Parafilm to prevent desiccation of the inoculum and disease symptoms were monitored throughout the season. At the end of the season infected shoots were collected, cankers measured, and compared morphologically with symptoms of cankers characteristic of LLDB. 3. Determine if herbicide drift contributes to LLDB symptoms. This experiment was performed at the Kearney Ag Center (KAC) in an almond block planted on January 26. We used trees of Butte, Nonpareil, and Padre Cultivars. Leaves were removed from about 18 inches of the lower scaffolds on July 16, 28. Glyphosate was sprayed on the limbs on July 23, 28. We had three treatments such as Roundup at 1% [commercial rate],.1%, and.1%, and an unsprayed control. There were three trees of each cultivar in each row and each tree had all four treatments. Thus there were six replicate branches of each treatment per cultivar. In order to determine if drift of herbicide reaches the lower limbs, two almond and two pistachio orchards were selected. Trials were conducted in two pistachio orchards at the Kearney Ag Center and in one almond orchard at the Kearney Ag Center and second one in a Stanislaus County that Bruce Lampinen is working in (Stanislaus County #1). Young, 2-week-old squash plants were placed on the berm or on poles in the tree rows 3, 5, and 7 feet high at five replicate sites per orchard. Squash plants placed on the orchard floors distant from the spray served as unsprayed controls. After the herbicide spray had dried, the squash plants were collected and brought to the Kearney Agricultural Center, placed in a greenhouse, and observed for herbicide symptom development over a 3- week period. Killing of the plants, stunting, or other typical symptoms of glyphosate damage as described in the literature would indicate that they received drift of this herbicide. The effects of the herbicide on the squash plants kept at different heights would indicate if drift has reached the squash plants and at what height. By running the spray equipment at the Kearney Ag Center trials using parameters somewhat outside of what most applicators use, we attempted to intentionally cause drift. We grew Jackpot F1 hybrid summer squash. Plants used in the field trials had two fully expanded true leaves and two additional small new leaves. Glyphosate (Roundup Weather Max) was sprayed at 4 pints/acre at 25 GPA for the KAC trials. For the KAC trials, the pressure was increased from 35 to Almond Board of California - 3-28 - 29 Final Research Report

55 psi and the nozzle size was decreased from 84 to 82. Two tips per boom were used for the berm sprays: OC-2 and T-Jet. The wind speed for January 27, 29 at 1 am was 2.4 mph from the south and the temperature was 42 F. Two pistachio blocks with rows running east to west were used. Because the wind was from the south, the berm on the row with the squash and the adjacent berm to the south were sprayed. On January 29, 29, the same experiment was repeated in a KAC almond orchard with rows running east to west. The temperature was 45 F at 1 am and the wind speed was 3.9 mph from the south. In this test, the two berms to the south of the berm with the squash plants were also sprayed. On February 25, 29, we conducted the same experiment at the Stanislaus County #1 almond orchard that Bruce Lampinen is working in Ceres, CA. The temperature was 58 F at the 1 am spray time and the wind was reported to be calm at Modesto Airport, but there appeared to be about a 2 mph wind from the north in the orchard in Ceres. The herbicide sprayer parameters were 3 GPA, with 28 lbs pressure and air injected nozzles were used to reduce drift. Three herbicides were tank mixed. Prowl H 2 O (EPA Reg 241-418 at 1 Gal/Ac, Orchard Star at 3 pints/ac (2, 4, D) (4275-19), and Glyphosate X-tra (4787-23) at 3 pints/ac. First Choice herbicide activator (CA 11656-524-2C) was sprayed at 12 oz/ac. In addition, to this experiment that would measure possible drift of herbicide onto the lower portions of limbs, we examined lower limbs by scraping the bark and observed the tissues around the lenticels. This is done because in LLDB limbs there are brown necrotic tissues around the lenticels, an indication that perhaps something toxic enters through the lenticels killing the tissues. We would like to follow up on this line of thinking that perhaps the glyphosate is slightly injuring the buds or leaf scars in the late fall or dormant season, and perhaps providing an infection site for Botryosphaeria or Phomopsis. 4. Band Canker - Determine when infections by Botryosphaeria dothidea occur. Answering the question when infections of almond by the band canker pathogen(s) occur is of major importance to be able to develop effective control measures against the disease. Once effective fungicides have been determined, we would know when to apply these fungicides to prevent infection of trunks. We have determined, based on two years of monthly inoculations that early spring seems to be the period when canker development is most rapid. It can be argued that, although this is when cankers appear to develop faster, this may or may not be the time when most of the infections occur in almond trees. Groups of trees were exposed periodically under trunks bearing pycnidia of B. dothidea and they are now under continuous observation to determine which group of trees will show most infections. After growing these trees for an additional year, we did not observe any gumming when evaluated nor did we see signs of canker development by mid October 28, perhaps due to long drought. We will continue monitoring these trees Almond Board of California - 4-28 - 29 Final Research Report

for symptom development, in case the infections are latent due to unfavorable severe drought conditions in the last two years. 5. Identify and determine species compositions of Botryosphaeria found in association with band canker, lower limb dieback, cankers in the canopy, and fruit blight of almond. We found earlier that the fungus so far identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea on almond represents at least five different species. These are Botryosphaeria dothidea, Neofusicoccum mediterraneum, Botryosphaeria parva, as well as Botryosphaeria cf parva and Botryosphaeria cf arbuti. Here we report results from our efforts to find names for all Botryosphaeria species isolated from California almond, as well as virulence assays to gain insight into the pathogenicity of these species. For two of the above species, temporarily referred to as B. cf parva and B. cf arbuti, no names could be determined based on DNA analyses, thus requiring morphological investigations done by measuring pycnidia and spore sizes of these isolates and comparing them with characteristics of isolates received from herbaria in the USA and internationally. 6. Virulence Assays. Virulence assays were performed on approx. 2 ½ year-old potted almond trees (cv. Carmel) at the Kearney Ag Center. Tree stems were wounded and inoculated on 11 July 28 with a potato dextrose agar plug with fungal mycelium or without (control), and sealed with Parafilm to prevent desiccation. Cankers were measured after 75 days. Treatments were randomized, and consisted of 14 fungal strains representing 6 species, and one agar control, five replicates each, thus requiring a total of 75 trees. This experiment was repeated on ust 19, 28. Results and Discussion: 1. Select orchards with a history of LLDB and make isolations periodically to determine the succession of colonization by fungi (Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis). The frequency of isolation of B. dothidea and Phomopsis sp. from limbs with symptoms was higher than that from isolations from the symptomless limbs (Figure 1). However, both fungi were found in symptomless branches and limbs of almonds, suggesting that propagules of these fungi can live in the bark of these trees. The higher frequency of isolation from limbs with symptoms indicate that these fungi have grown more, but does not prove that they are really responsible for causing lower limb dieback. Interestingly, the frequency of Aspergillus niger was higher in limbs with LLDB symptoms than those without symptoms. In general, isolations made later in the season had higher levels of B. dothidea, Phomopsis sp., and A. niger. Almond Board of California - 5-28 - 29 Final Research Report

2. Determine whether B. dothidea and Phomopsis spp. can cause LLDB symptoms in the field. Results from inoculations of almond with Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis isolates on 2 July 28 are shown in Table 1. With the exception of isolate of Botryosphaeria 661, the two isolates of Botryosphaeria resulted in larger cankers than the cankers produced by Phomopsis. Only Phomopsis 3774 caused a small canker while the other two isolates were not pathogenic (Table 1). In general, the two Botryosphaeria isolates produced larger cankers in the thrifty trees than those in the unthrifty trees. 3. Determine if herbicide drift contributes to LLDB symptoms. In the first four tests, we did not observe any herbicide damage symptoms on squash plants placed at 3, 5, and 7 feet above the berm, but those placed on the berm which received direct contact with the herbicide spray were killed. The lack of symptoms on the squash plants may be attributed to the fact that the wind speed was very low on the dates when these experiments took place and thus there was not much drift. Later in season, we will go back in these orchards to examine the lower limbs by scraping the bark and observe the tissues around the lenticels. This will be done because in LLDB there are brown tissues around the lenticels, an indication that perhaps something toxic enters through the lenticels killing the tissues. Thus we will look for this characteristic symptom, which is very typical of LLDB. Very preliminary observations showed that there may be some damage in the scars where the leaves were removed. No other symptoms were observed, but we will continue monitoring these limbs, just in case, that the damage takes longer time to reveal symptoms. In addition, all the sites in the commercial orchards where we exposed the squash will again visited and any symptoms of LLDB will be recorded. Band Canker: 4. Determine when infection by B. dothidea of almond occurs (second year experiment using the spore dispersal wooden construction). We have determined, based on two years of monthly inoculations that early spring seems to be the period when canker development is most rapid. From serial inoculations of potted trees, we found that the infections that occur during March to developed the most and apparently those will be the ones causing the most severe damage to the trees. When groups of trees were exposed periodically under trunks bearing pycnidia of B. dothidea (inoculum of the pathogen) no symptoms of infection develop. After growing these trees for two more seasons, we did not observe any gumming when evaluated nor did we see signs of infection or cankers development. The lack of infection of these trees may be attributed to the fact, that Almond Board of California - 6-28 - 29 Final Research Report

the young trees are resistant to infection, and perhaps they need to develop rough bark until the fungus is established in them. We will check this hypothesis in a future experiment with older trees. In previous research we showed that Botryosphaeria species colonize the bark of trees first and then we see symptoms of band canker, after the development of growth cracks, pruning wounds, or other type of wounds (tissue splitting due to wind shaking, branch breaking, etc.). We will continue monitoring these trees and have installed overhead sprinkler irrigation in order to provide enough moisture to trigger any possible infections that might have occurred and remained latent due to unfavorable severe drought conditions in the last two years. Lower Limb Dieback and Band Canker: 5. Identify and determine species compositions of Botryosphaeria found in association with band canker, LLDB, cankers in the canopy, and fruit blights of almond. The results from determining species of Botryosphaeria fungi from almond are shown in Figure 2. Based on similarities in conidium size and shape, we then identified candidate names for F. cf arbuti and B. cf parva. We chose conidium characters as a criterion for selection because these characters were mentioned in most species descriptions. To find names for F. cf arbuti and B. cf parva, we expanded our database with morphological information of the 191 known Fusicoccum species. We found that F. cf arbuti conidia from almond were on average 24 µm long and 7 µm wide (and average length-to-width ratio of 3.3). In our dataset, there were 25 species with similar conidia lengths and shapes. Similarly, F. cf parva conidia from almond were 19 6.2 µm (average length-to-width ration = 3.1). After completing all the possible comparisons, between F. cf arbuti and B. cf parva, six candidate species were shared, requiring us to order the type material of 26 species for morphological examination from herbaria in the US, Europe, and South Africa. One herbarium specimen of Fusicoccum persicae has so far been received from the US Department of Agriculture Herbarium in Beltsville, MD. Morphological investigations showed that the F. persicae type material, comprised clusters of pycnidia breaking through the bark of small peach branches. However, the size and shape of the pycnidiospores and the abundance of the stromatic tissues (black tissues surrounding the pycnidia) differed from those of the B. cf parva, and for this reason, B. cf parva differs from F. persicae morphologically, and can thus not be called F. persicae. Our results showed that all species isolated from canopy cankers of almond are also present in band cankers. That makes a recent introduction of the canopy canker fungi into California unlikely but shows that canopy cankers can be caused from band canker inoculum. Also, the almond band canker fungi are present on other hosts that can serve as additional inoculum sources. Further studies should focus on the relative importance of each of these species to band canker, canopy canker, and fruit blight. Almond Board of California - 7-28 - 29 Final Research Report

6. Virulence assays. We found that the cankers on the almond sapling stems did not differ between species, except in Botryosphaeria parva and Neofusicoccum mediterraneum where the cankers were significantly longer than in B. dothidea, B. cf parva, and N. arbuti, respectively (Figure 3). Differences in canker lengths were relatively small, since almost 9% of the cankers were 4 cm in length or shorter. The longest cankers, up to 1 cm in length, were observed in B. parva. No cankers were observed in the controls. These data are intriguing, as they suggest that B. parva might be more virulent than both B. dothidea and B. cf parva. However, these results have to be confirmed by the second replicate (second inoculation) to be harvested and evaluated in mid November 29. 7. Other studies. a) Chemical control of band canker. We have just initiated this study to manage band canker by painting the tree trunks with fungicides mixed with latex paint. This orchard is located in Glenn County and showed uniform distribution of the disease in the section where the experiment was set (Figure 4). In addition, the disease was at the early stages of development and showed various degrees of band canker severity. The reason for initiating this experiment was based on the premise that it may be possible to manage band canker at an earlier stage of development. Details of this experiment are given in Table 2. It is too early to provide results since thi experiment was initiated on 14, 29. b) Band canker distribution. On July 1, 29 we mapped six rows for band canker symptoms on four year old Nonpareil cultivar almonds running north south. The cankers were rated for severity on a scale of to 3: with meaning symptomless trees; 1 with cankers < 25% around the trunk; 2 with cankers < 5% around the trunk; and 3 with cankers > 5% around the trunk. Canopy symptoms were categorized as either light or severe thinning of the canopy. For the purposes of the graph, all six rows and groups of 1 trees per row (incidence per 6 trees) were averaged to determine the percentage of trees with band canker symptoms per section of the orchard. In Figure 4, trees with any symptom (Categories 1, 2, and 3) of band canker were included while in Figure 5, only trees with severe band canker symptoms were included (Category 3). Figure 5 shows that disease was more severe in the north side of the orchard which is located close to a row of old eucalyptus trees. Eucalyptus trees have been reported to harbor Botryosphaeria species. Examination of samples from those Eucalyptus trees revealed both the pycnidia and pseudothecia of Botryosphaeria species, which suggests that infections in this orchard started first in the north side and it is spreading to the south (Figures 4 & 5). Almond Board of California - 8-28 - 29 Final Research Report

Conclusions: 1. Isolations from limbs of trees with symptoms of LLDB and without symptoms revealed both Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis species. In general, the frequency of these fungi increased with time during the growing season. 2. Isolation of Botryosphaeria species from symptomless limbs suggests that these fungi can live in the almond bark waiting for the right conditions to initiate disease. 3. At least five species were identified hidden within Botryosphaeria dothidea from almond. These are B. dothidea, Neofusicoccum mediterraneum, B. parva, as well as B. cf parva and B. cf arbuti. 4. All species isolated from canopy cankers are also present in band cankers, suggesting that canopy canker can be caused from band canker inoculum. In addition, the species recovered from band canker of almond are present on other hosts that can serve as additional inoculum sources for almond infection. 5. Virulence studies showed that B. parva was the most virulent species followed by N. mediterraneum and B. cf parva in causing cankers after inoculation of potted Carmel almond trees. 6. In inoculations studies, the Botryosphaeria isolates were more aggressive and caused larger cankers than the Phomopsis isolates, after artificial inoculation of Nonpareil almonds in an experimental fields. 7. In general, the involvement of five different species of Botryosphaeria as causes of band canker makes the management of this disease challenging and very difficult. Table 1. Inoculation with Phomopsis and Botryosphaeria isolates and canker formation from the July 2, 28 inoculation. Inoculation rating score 1 Isolate Thrifty trees (good growth) Unthrifty trees (poor growth) Phomopsis 719.8 b.6 b Phomopsis 722.6 b. b Phomopsis 3774 1.2 b. b Botryosphaeria 661.6 b.4 b Botryosphaeria 89 3. a 1.6 a Botryosphaeria 3449 2. ab 1.5 a 1 Limbs were inoculated at four sites per limb, measuring from the terminal to the basal sections, corresponding to.5, 1, 2, and 3-5 cm diameter sites on the limb. Rating scale: a rating of 1 means that only the terminal inoculation caused a canker (mildly virulent isolate), while a rating of 4 means that all four inoculation sites down the shoot caused a canker (virulent isolate). Almond Board of California - 9-28 - 29 Final Research Report

Table 2. Effect of fungicides applied in white latex paint on the control of Almond band canker in David Lohse Nonpareil almonds in Glenn County ( 14, 29). Treatment Color Rate per acre Rate per gallon Abound BW 15.4 fl oz 91 ml Pristine Blue 14.5 oz 82 g Captan 4L B-dot 1.125 gallon 851 ml Plant Shield Y 2.5 lb 227 g Control with paint only Or-dot Unpainted control Pink Extra Pristine Treatment Painted on severe RBL 14.5 oz 82 g band cankers(see below) Unpainted control of severe band cankers RBL Methods: We applied about 1 gallons per acre. We used Glidden Interior flat latex paint (part number HM 1211 Base 1) and the paint was diluted 1 part paint interior latex paint and 1 part water. (White = no canker; Red = middle size canker (canker was < 25% around the trunk); RBL = large canker (canker extended around the trunk the same color was used for trees either painted with Pristine). A Botryosphaeria sp. (%) 4 3 2 1 Stan. - 1 Stan. - 2 Stan. - 3 A Botryosphaeria sp. (%) 5 4 3 2 1 Butte - 1 Butte - 2 Butte - 3 A Butte % % % % % % Padre Butte Padre Butte Padre % % % % Butte Nonpareil Butte Aldrich Carmel Aldrich B 4 Stanislaus - 1, 2, 3 Butte - 1 5 Butte - 2 Butte - 3 Botryosphaeria sp. (%) 3 2 1 Botryosphaeria sp. (%) 4 3 2 1 % % % % % Jun Oct Jun Oct Butte Padre Butte Aldrich 1% % 1% 1% Jun Oct Jun Oct Jun Oct Jun Oct Nonpareil Carmel Butte Aldrich C D Figure 1. Incidence of isolations of Botryosphaeria species isolated from A and B cankers in limbs killed by lower limb dieback (LLDB) in three orchards each in Stanislaus and Butte Counties and from those C and D without any symptoms of LLDB collected from the same orchards (28). Almond Board of California - 1-28 - 29 Final Research Report

cm PD48 N. mediterraneum Almond Merced B. ribis Currant New York PD57 Almond trunk Butte PD59 Almond canopy Colusa Unnamed species B. cf parva PD16 B. parva almond LLDB Butte PD148 B. parva almond trunk Butte PD244 F. arbuti Pacific Madrone WA PD252 F. andinum Eucalyptus Venezuela 5 changes PD86 Almond bark Colusa PD9 Almond bark Butte Unnamed species B. cf arbuti Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of the Botryosphaeria spp. isolated from almond and the two new species of Botryosphaeria and a few of other related species from other tree hosts. 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B. dothidea N. mediterraneum B. parva B. cf parva N. arbuti B. cf arbuti Figure 3. Mean stem canker lengths and standard errors for six different species in the Botryosphaeria group of fungi on almond potted trees. Note that cankers in N. mediterraneum and B. parva were significantly longer than in B. cf parva and N. arbuti. (N. arbuti is a fungus from Pacific madrone not known to occur on almond.). Almond Board of California - 11-28 - 29 Final Research Report

18 Band canker incidence (%) 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Trees south of north end Figure 4. Distribution of almond band canker in a Glenn County orchard (average of six rows). All three categories of cankers included a scale of 1, 2, and 3 severity categories, corresponding to cankers with <25, <5, and >5% of trunk circumference. 12 Band canker incidence (%) 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Trees south of north end Figure 5. Distribution of almond band canker in a Glenn County orchard (average of six rows). Only cankers in category 3 (severe cankers) included which corresponds to cankers with >5% of trunk circumference. Almond Board of California - 12-28 - 29 Final Research Report