PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Similar documents
0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

~culture Series No. 5~

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Department of Horticulture ~ The Ohio State University

Department of Horticulture The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research &Development Center Wooster, OH 44691

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2006 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

EVALUATION OF TOMATO VARIETIES FOR MECHANICAL HARVEST. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. Northwest Branch, Custar, Ohio

Evaluation of Summer Cabbage for Tolerance to Onion Thrips. Christy Hoepting & Katie Klotzbach Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program

osu 1986 VEGETABLE CULTIVAR EVALUATIONS * GREEN WRAP TOMATOES * FRESH MARKET STAKED TOMATOES * SUPER SWEET CORN * NORMAL SWEET CORN

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2004

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

1

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

OHIO. SfA1E SWEET CORN CULTIV AR EVALUATIONS Richard L. Hassell Horticulture & Crop Science OARDC/OSU Wooster, OH '

S.z. Berry W.A. Gould G.D. Dyer C.C. Willer N.J. Flickinger

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

Blackberry trials in Denmark

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

A Field Evaluation of Select Wine Grape Varieties for the Aurora and Medford Areas of Oregon- A Progress Report

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

2002 NEW JERSEY MEDIUM ROUND HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1. Rutgers Cooperative Extension INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2006

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

U-Pick and Small Market Blueberry Cultivars for Mississippi S.J. Stringer and D.A. Marshall-Shaw USDA-ARS TCSHL, Poplarville, MS

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Sweet Corn Variety Performance

EFFECTS OF SIMULATED HAIL ON PICKLING CUCUMBERS

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Additional comments su type

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

GREENHOUSE TOMATO BREEDING SUMMER CROP 1988 FIELD EVALUATION TRIALS, WOOSTER W. A. Erb, N. J. Flickinger and J. Y. Elliott

Michigan State University 2015 Seedless Pickling Cucumber Variety Trial

Transcription:

Horticulture Series 594 November 988 l'-\. ': j'd r ~ A'. 988 PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS Dale w. Kretchman, Casey Hoy, Mark Jameson and Charles Willer /I Department of Horticulture The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, OH 4469 r' ( r (

This page intentionally blank.

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIAL FOR NORTHWESTERN OHIO Dale Kretchman, casey Hoy, Mark Jameson and Charles Willer The cabbage cultivar trial was conducted at the Vegetable Crops Branch of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, near Fremont, Ohio. The soil is a sandy loam. The plots received 700 lbs. per acre of 0-0-0 plus lb. per acre of boron pre-plant broadcast. In addition, 50 lbs. per acre of 6-4- was drilled to the side of each row at planting. The study was field seeded on April 6 in rows spaced 0 ft. long on 0-in. centers. The rows were hand-thinned after emergence to 8 in. between plants. Each cultivar was replicated 4 times in a complete randomized block design. Commercial practices for weed, insect and disease control were followed and no serious problems developed during the season. The season was abnormally hot and dry and thus, plots were irrigated when needed to maintain satisfactory growth. When the majority of the heads in a plot reached maturity as indicated by size and firmness, the cultivars were evaluated for plant size, plant uprightness (for mechanical harvesting), uniformity and apparent head shape. After harvest weight and numbers of heads were recorded, heads from each plot were cut and core length and equatorial and polar diameters recorded, internal color, leaf mid-rib thickness and tip burn were evaluated. Five heads were examined for susceptibility to thrips and evaluated for thrip injury. Monthly rainfall totals were: Irrigated April 6 to 0.7 in. May 6.00 in. May.9 in. May.00 in. June.6 in. July.5 in. July.84 in. August 5.68 in. September.8 in. To October 4.8 in. Seed companies who provided seed for the trials include Bejo Zaden (BZ), Ferry Morse Seed Co. (FM), Harris-Moran Seed Co. (HM), Northrup King Co. (NK), Petoseed Co. (PS), Reed's Seeds (R), Stokes Seeds, Inc. (ST), and Sun Seeds, Inc. (SS). All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, sex, or religious affiliation. /88-S444-00

TABLE. Yield and quality characteristics of cabbage cultivars for processing. Replicated Trial-988. HSl~est Data H~asurements (in. l Date Tons; Lbs/ % Core Polar Equat. Cultivars Source harv. acre head Cut length diam. diam. Atria R 9/4 4.8 7.9 95.9.00 7.58 8.5 Applause HM 8/9 8. 7.4 88.5.08 7.4 9.08 HMX-55 HM 9/4 7.6 7. 84.4.54 6.9 8.54 Quisto NK 9/4 6.9 6.8 90..04 7.9 7.8 HMX-445 HM 9/ 6.4 7.8 9. 4.08 8.54 8.6 Superdane R 9/ 5. 6.5 94.8.75 7. 7.79 survivor ST 9/ 4.8 7. 88..00 7. 7.9 Olympic NK 8/9 4.7 7.7 8.7.8 7. 8.87 Safekeeper ST 9/ 4. 7. 8. 4. 7.58 7.95 Bravo HM 9/.9 7. 9..0 7.4 8.45 Struckton ST 0/4.5 6.9 97.5.4 7.4 7.45 Ocala ss 9/4.8 6. 88..6 7.08 8.5 Rio Verde NK 9/4.7 7. 84.0.58 6.9 8.70 Stonar ST 0/4.6 6.6 89.0.5 7. 7.7 Titanic 90 FM 8/9. 6.9 8.0.58 7.50 8. Multikeeper ST 0/4 0.8 6. 98..00 6.9 7.5 Pennant NK 8/9 0. 6.8 76.8.66 7.66 7.75 Super kraut R 9/4 9.6 7. 66.7.45 7.66 8.7 Genesis ss 9/ 9. 6. 8..75 7.75 8.00 King Cole FM 8/9 5.4 5. 8..79 6.66 7.08 Grenadier* NK Ull 0.4 L... 74.0 LSD 5% 6. 0.8. 0.45 0.49 0.46 *Very early fresh market type - was mature to harvest prior to 8/.

Cultivar TABLE. Quality characteristic ratings of cabbage cultivars for processing. Replicated Trial-988*. Plant Characteristics* Plant Plant Uniformity Size Uprightness Atria Applause HMX-55 Quisto HMX-445 Superdane Survivor Olympic Safekeeper Bravo Struckton Ocala Rio Verde Stonar Titanic 90 Multikeeper Pennant super kraut Genesis King Cole Grenadier * Uniformity: = good; = fair; = poor Plant Size: = small; = medium; = large Uprightness: = upright; = slightly tipped; = very tipped

TABLE. Yield and quality characteristics of cabbage cultivars for processing. Observational Trial-988. Harvest Date Measurements Date Tons/ Lbs/ Core Polar Cultivars Source harv. acre head length diam. Marvell en R 8/9 40. 7.68.00 8.00 PSR-6880(R) PS 8/9. 6..00 7.80 Carlton BZ 9/4 4.7 7.46.0 8.0 (in. l Equat. diam. 8.00 7.80 7.60 TABLE 4. Quality characteristics of cabbage cultivars for processing. Observational Trial-988. Plant Characteristics* Plant Plant Cultivar Uniformity Size Uprightness Marvell en PSR-6880 (R) Carlton *Uniformity: = good; = fair; = poor Plant Size: small; = medium; = large Uprightness: = upright; = slightly tipped; = very tipped 4

TABLE 5. Onion thrips damage to processing cabbage cultivars-988* Cull Wt. Head Wt. Damag~ Trim Time Cultivar (gm) (gm) rating (sec) Ocala 0.0 697 0.00 6.9 Bravo 0.0 48 0.00 6.9 Safekeeper 0.4 07 0.05 7. Superkraut. 98 0.0 7.4 Titanic 90 7. 960 0.5 8.0 Genesis.0 474 0.5 8.4 Applause 0.7 047 0.60 0.6 Pennant. 954 0.50.9 Rio Verde.0 006 0.5.0 King Cole 44.6 0 0.70 Olympic 66. 90 0.60.9 HMX-445 4.7 49 0.95 7.5 HMX-55. 80.5. Atria 8.0.5 4. Multikeeper 56. 5.00.4 Superdane 05.5 95.5 6.0 Struckton 4. 67.0 8.4 Stonar 47. 40.5 9.7 Quisto 708.0 95.60 6.8 survivor 78.9 468.40 55.6 Fisher's PLSD 48. 406 0.68 9.6 *Cull weight refers to the average amount of cabbage that had to be trimmed from the head to remove all thrips injury. Head weight is the average weight of the cabbage head after thrips injury has been removed. Damage ratings were on a scale of 0 (no injury) to 4 (severe bronzing extending several layers into the head). Trim time is the average time required to trim all thrips off the cabbage heads. 5

TABLE 6. Quality observations on cultivars and lines including internal quality - 988. Cultivar super kraut Titanic 90 Genesis Survivor struckton Stonar Multikeeper Safekeeper Olympic Quisto Pennant Grenadier Comments Large frame, good uniformity, very tipped, thick mid-ribs, white inside, no outside basal buds, few internal buds, mild flavor. Large frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, moderate to heavy mid-ribs, white inside, no outside basal buds, no internal buds, mild flavor, large crooked core. Large frame, fair uniformity, very tipped, medium to heavy mid-ribs, white inside, very large outside basal buds, very small internal buds, mild flavor. Large frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, medium mid-ribs, yellowish green inside, no outside basal buds, very small internal buds, mild flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, upright, thick mid-ribs, light yellow inside, no outside or internal buds, strong flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, long stem, very late, narrow cupped leaves, medium mid-ribs, light yellow inside, crooked core, mild flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, very tipped, large outside basal buds, medium large ribs, white inside, gray color at top of core, undesirable off-flavor. Large frame, poor uniformity, slightly tipped, large mid-ribs, white inside, few outside basal buds, cracked core, sweet to slightly strong flavor. Large frame, good uniformity, upright, medium mid-ribs, light yellowish green inside, strong flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, thick mid-ribs, white inside, sweet mild flavor. Medium frame, fair uniformity, upright, medium, mid-ribs, light yellowish green inside, mild flavor. No observations made, an early fresh-market type. 6

Cultivar Rio Verde HMX-445 HMX-55 Applause Ocala Bravo Atria superdane Marvell en PSR-6880(R) Carlton Comments Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, thick mid-ribs, white inside, some outside basal buds, strong flavor. Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, plants are blue-green in color, medium mid-ribs, yellowish white inside. Medium frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, medium mid-ribs, light green inside, few external and internal basal buds, mild flavor. Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, thick mid-ribs, white inside, strong flavor, has highly promising characteristics. Medium frame, fair uniformity, very tipped, medium mid-ribs, light green inside, few small basal buds, strong flavor. Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, medium mid-ribs, yellowish white inside, very large outside basal buds, small inside basal buds, mild flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, medium mid-ribs, yellowish green inside, crooked core, strong flavor. Large frame, good uniformity, upright, thick, mid-ribs, yellowish-green inside, few internal basal buds, brown tip at core, bland flavor. Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, thick mid-ribs, white inside, sweet flavor. Medium frame, good uniformity, slightly tipped, medium mid-ribs, white inside, strong flavor. Large frame, fair uniformity, slightly tipped, large mid-ribs, leaves very upright, yellow inside, mild flavor. 7

This page intentionally blank.

This page intentionally blank.

This page intentionally blank.