Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Similar documents
Managing potato leafhopper in wine grapes

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2012 Research Report. Understanding foliar pest interactions for sustainable vine management

Wine Grape: Cold Climate Viticulture

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Managing Insect Pests of Ripening Grapes

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 September 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Leaf removal: a tool to improve crop control and fruit quality in vinifera grapes

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium Final Report Title: Final Report Grant Code: Research Project Personnel: Objectives: Justification:

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide.

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2014 Research Report. Biology and management of invasive insect pests in Michigan vineyards 2014

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Report of Progress 961

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases

Mechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris. Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2015 Research Report. Biology and management of invasive insect pests in Michigan vineyards 2015

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

ALTERNATIVE CONTROL METHODS FOR GRAPE LEAFHOPPER: PART 2 FINAL REPORT 1/22/01

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 May 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Monitoring and Controlling Grape Berry Moth in Texas Vineyards

Demonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 14 May 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

ASSESSMENT OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE WEST INDIAN CANEFLY AND SUGARCANE APHID, 2017

Global Perspectives Grant Program

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 26 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Corn Earworm: Is It Resistant to Pyrethroids?

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Report of Progress 961

2008 Research Report to the Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council

Risk Assessment of Grape Berry Moth and Guidelines for Management of the Eastern Grape Leafhopper

Spider Mite Management in Walnuts. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UCCE Kern County Tri-County Walnut Day, 2008

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

Soil application of neonicotinoid insecticides for control of insect pests in wine grape vineyards

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Mealybug Species. Vine Mealybug. Grape and Obscure Mealybugs. Longtailed Mealybug. Pink Hibiscus Mealybug. Gills Mealybug

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Management of Croploadon Honeycrispto optimize fruit quality and return bloom

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Training system considerations

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

Report of Progress 945

Update on Small Fruit Insecticides for grapes, blueberries, and brambles. Rick Weinzierl University of Illinois

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Willsboro Grape Variety Trial Willsboro Research Farm Willsboro, NY

Citrus Crop Guide. New registration for citrus gall wasp

Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU

Biology and phenology of scale insects in a cool temperate region of Australia

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

2005 Research: Monitoring, Sanitation, and Insect Pest Management in Figs

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Crops - Commercial. Soybean

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Watermelon production IDEA-NEW

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Sustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry

Causes and Prevention of Thompson Seedless Berry Collapse

SWD in Cherry. Larry Gut and Nikki Rothwell

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

Overview. Cold Climate Grape Growing: Starting and Sustaining a Vineyard

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Chemical Control Options for SWD in Blueberries, Caneberries, Strawberries, Grapes, and Stone fruits

Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control In Non-Overseeded Bermudagrass Turf Report

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

SWD Management Recommendations for Michigan Blueberry

Grape Weed Control. Harlene Hatterman-Valenti North Dakota State University

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Insect Pests of Cucurbits in New Hampshire

Vegetable Insecticide Update. Final cancellation order for sulfoxaflor¹. Calypso 4 F (thiacloprid) Final cancellation order for sulfoxaflor

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 15 September 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station

Effects of Plastic Covers on Canopy Microenvironment and Fruit Quality. Matthew Fidelibus Viticulture & Enology UC Davis

Transcription:

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report Determination of action thresholds for potato leafhopper in winegrapes, and comparison of foliar insecticides for its control Rufus Isaacs 1, Steven Van Timmeren 1, and Paolo Sabbatini 2 1. Dept. of Entomology and 2. Dept. of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 INTRODUCTION Grapevines grown in Michigan are at risk of infestation by a wide range of insect pests, but one of the most damaging to wine vineyards is the potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (PLH). This insect flies into Michigan on weather fronts during the springtime when rapid shoot elongation is underway, and infestation of vines can quickly lead to feeding damage and a hypersensitive response in susceptible cultivars. Within a few days, yellowing and cupping of leaves is seen followed by stunting of shoot growth. This rapid vine response often means that vineyard managers realize this pest has infested their vines too late, when symptoms are already visible and increasing. There is a strong desire among Michigan vineyard managers for clear guidance on thresholds that can be used to decide when too many PLH are present, and a need for information on the relative effectiveness of the various new insecticides that have promise for PLH control. This new research project is a collaboration between the MSU viticulture and entomology programs and involves a two-pronged approach to providing growers with the information they need for effective control of PLH: 1) determine how much PLH infestation vines of low, medium, and high susceptibility can withstand before there is measurable reduction in vine productivity and 2) compare currently-registered and promising insecticides to determine their efficacy and residual control of PLH. The objectives of this study are as follows: Objective 1. Determine action thresholds for PLH in grapevines with varying levels of pest susceptibility, crop load, and maturity. Hypothesis 1.1: Vine susceptibility will affect the degree of injury caused by PLH. Hypothesis 1.2: Reduced crop load will increase vine capacity to tolerate PLH infestation. Hypothesis 1.3: Tolerance to PLH will be greater in mature vines than in young vines. Objective 2. Compare foliar insecticides for their ability to control PLH. Hypothesis 2.1: PLH are more effectively controlled by neonicotinoids than by pyrethroids or botanical insecticides. Hypothesis 2.2: Residual control against PLH will be greater using neonicotinoids compared to pyrethroids or botanical insecticides. 1

Hypothesis 1.1 - Vine susceptibility will affect the degree of injury caused by PLH. In spring 2008 vines were planted in pots based on their susceptibility to PLH, including Pinot Gris (susceptible), Chardonnay (intermediate), and Vignoles (resistant). These vines were allowed to grow through the 2008 growing and were maintained with a standard program of fungicides and insecticides, as well as regular watering via a drip irrigation system and fertilizing three times during the summer. In 2009 these vines will be used in the experiments outlined in the original grant proposal. A colony of PLH (Fig. 1) has been established at the Trevor Nichols Research Complex (TNRC) in Fennville, Michigan in order to have Figure 1. Colony of potato leafhoppers on fava beans. nymphs available to utilize in experiments taking place in 2009. Leafhoppers for this colony were collected in August 2008 from alfalfa fields in Lawton and Fennville, Michigan and were placed in Plexiglas cages containing fava beans, Vicia fava. Fava bean plants are replaced weekly to ensure fresh foliage for the leafhoppers to feed on. Hypothesis 1.2: Reduced crop load will increase vine capacity to tolerate PLH infestation. A new Pinot Gris vineyard was planted at TNRC in spring 2008 in anticipation of crop load experiments for this project that will be conducted in 2009. The vines were weighed before planting and the vineyard was laid out with blocking for vine weight. Vines were maintained with a standard pesticide program as well as weekly watering, and fertilizing three times during the summer to build vine size. In late fall 2008 the vines were buried in soil to protect them from damage over the winter. Posts and trellis wires for these vines will be installed in spring 2009 with the assistance of Fenn Valley vineyards, and the shoots will be trained to the trellis in 2009. We consider this new planting a long-term investment for winegrape research at TNRC. Figure 2. New Pinot Gris vineyard planted in May 2008 at the Trevor Nichols Research Complex. 2

Hypothesis 1.3: Tolerance to PLH will be greater in mature vines than in young vines. Methods A mature Pinot Noir vineyard at Fenn Valley vineyards, in Fennville, Michigan was used to determine how crop load affects tolerance to PLH. This vineyard was chosen for high levels of PLH in previous years (based on grower experience) as well as uniformity of vine age, size and health. Vines used in the experiment were adjusted to either a high crop load (3.3 tons per acre) or a low one (1.1 tons per acre) on 13 August 2008. Within each of these crop loads, vines were either treated with foliar insecticides to prevent infestation by PLH or were left untreated to allow for PLH infestation, using a randomized complete block design. The four treatments (low crop low PLH; low crop high PLH; high crop low PLH; high crop high PLH) were applied to six-vine plots and were replicated four times. Insecticides were applied to low PLH treatments on 24 June 2008 (Venom 70SG at 3 oz/acre) and on 1 July 2008 (Sevin XLR at 2 qt/acre) using a CO 2 backpack sprayer set at 50 psi, outfitted with a single head boom and a TeeJet 8003VS nozzle, delivering spray solution equivalent to 50 gallons per acre. The effect of PLH on vines was measured by counting the total number of leaves with yellowing around the edges on the vines on 18 July 2008. Once leaf yellowing assessments were conducted all treatments received the same insecticide program through harvest to prevent potential variability due to Japanese beetle leaf feeding and grape berry moth cluster infestation. On 29 September 2008 cluster samples were taken from the vines and were analyzed for Brix, titratable acidity (g per 100 ml), and ph to determine if PLH and crop load had an effect on fruit quality. Four clusters were sampled from the east side of each of the middle four vines in each replicate, with two clusters taken from close to the truck and two taken from farther down the cordon. Botrytis on clusters was removed to eliminate the effects it could potentially have on the cluster analyses. All data were analyzed using an Analysis of Variance followed by Fisher s Least Significant Difference Test for post hoc comparison of means (Statview v 5.0.1, Cary, NC). The number of leaves showing yellowing was significantly higher on vines that did not receive insecticide treatments for PLH than those that did receive treatments (Fig. 3) (F=7.14, df=3,12, P<0.01). Crop load did not significantly affect leaf yellowing. Average Number of Yellow Leaves 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 b Low Crop, Low PLH a Low Crop, High PLH High Crop, Low PLH High Crop, High PLH Treatment Figure 3. Average (±SE) number of Pinot Noir leaves with potato leafhopper feeding-induced yellowing on six-vine plots under differing crop loads and leafhopper pressure. Values with the same letter are not significantly different at α=0.05. b a 3

Analysis of cluster samples taken just before harvest showed no significant differences among the different treatments for Brix, titratable acidity, or ph (Table 1) (F<2.93, df=3,12, P>0.077). The lack of significant differences was not unexpected due to the low amount of PLH pressure in this vineyard in 2008 (as seen by the relatively low amount of leaf yellowing). In 2009 PLH populations in the high PLH treatments of the vineyard will be augmented with leafhoppers from the colony that has been established to ensure vines sustain damage. Table 1. Average (±SE) Brix, titratable acidity, and ph of Pinot Noir clusters at harvest under different crop loads and potato leafhopper pressure. Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at α=0.05. PLH level Crop level Brix ph TA (g/l) Low Low 20.14 ± 0.3 3.92 ± 0.04 5.84 ± 0.3 Low High 19.79 ± 0.3 3.79 ± 0.02 5.64 ± 0.3 High Low 19.88 ± 0.3 3.86 ± 0.03 5.93 ± 0.3 High High 20.59 ± 0.2 3.88 ± 0.03 6.39 ± 0.6 F 3,12 1.43 2.93 0.69 P 0.28 0.077 0.57 H 2.1: PLH are more effectively killed by neonicotinoids than by pyrethroids or botanical insecticides. H 2.2: Residual control against PLH will be greater using neonicotinoids compared to pyrethroids or botanical insecticides. Potato leafhopper spray trials took place in an Aurore vineyard at TNRC in Fennville, MI. Five insecticides were tested including Actara 25WDG (3.5oz/acre), Baythroid XL (3.2 oz/acre), Clutch 50WDG (2 oz/acre), Pyganic EC (32 oz/acre), and Sevin XLR (2 qt/acre) as well as an untreated control. Treatments were applied to three-vine plots and were replicated four times. Insecticide application took place on 18 June 2008 using a CO 2 backpack sprayer set at 50 psi, outfitted with a single head boom and a TeeJet 8003VS nozzle, delivering spray solution equivalent to 50 gallons per acre. Treatments were assessed by counting the total number of potato leafhopper adults and nymphs on 10 leaves per vine for the three vines in the replicate. Leafhoppers were assessed the day before insecticides were applied and six days after application Due to low PLH populations, there were no significant differences among any of the treatments six days after treatment (F=2.0, df=5,18, P=0.13). In addition, the lack of PLH in large enough numbers made clip cage experiments difficult to carry out. Experiments in 2009 will utilize PLH from the colony that has been established and was described previously in this report. Conclusions Experiments on crop load and PLH pressure showed significantly higher amounts of leaf yellowing in the high PLH treatments, but this stress did not result in any significant differences in Brix, titratable acidity, or ph in clusters at harvest. This was possibly due to low PLH pressure this year; the experiment will continue in 2009 with PLH population augmentation from the colony if it proves necessary. Preparations were made in 2008 for experiments related to varietal susceptibility and crop load and their relationship to PLH feeding. Grape vines were planted in pots as well as in a new vineyard at TNRC in Fennville, Michigan in anticipation of these experiments. In addition, a PLH colony has 4

been established to provide a reliable source of leafhoppers for experiments to take place in 2009. Spray trials in 2008 suffered from low numbers of PLH and will be run again in 2009 using PLH from the colony that has been established. Acknowledgements We thank the staff at TNRC as well as Adam Young, Robert Young, Ryan Renkema, and Jon Wyma for technical help this study. We also thank Doug Welsch for the use of his vineyard and Tim Seppala for use of his alfalfa fields for collection of potato leafhoppers, as well as the Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council and GREEEN for financial support of this study. 5