Insect Screening Results

Similar documents
GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Georgia 2012 Corn Performance Tests

Anton E. Coy, John D. Gassett, and J. LaDon Day Editors

New Insect Traits in Corn. Glenn Studebaker Extension Entomologist

2012 Guide to Bt Corn for Georgia

Corn Information for North Carolina Corn Growers

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Douglas County Corn Soybean Grower Assn. Plot Results

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

2011 Kentucky Hybrid Corn Performance Test William L. Pearce, Ron W. Curd, and Chad Lee, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Report of Progress 961

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

The proliferation of double-and

2012 Agronomic Research

CORN SILAGE TESTS IN TENNESSEE 2017

GEORGIA Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, and Summer Annual Forages Performance Tests

2011 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

2016 Corn Silage Field Crop Trials Results

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

2013 Corn Silage Harvest Report for Wisconsin Central [ WICE ] Charlie Knigge, Winnebago County, WI [ OMRO ]

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Bt Corn Technology in Texas: A Practical View

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

GEORGIA Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, and Summer Annual Forages Performance Tests. John D. Gassett, J. LaDon Day and Anton E.

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

CORN SILAGE YIELD AND DIGESTIBILITY TRIAL

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

GEORGIA Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, and Summer Annual Forages Performance Tests

Resistance to Phomopsis Stem Canker in Cultivated Sunflower 2011 Field Trials

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

Corn Growth and Development

IPM Updates for Scott Stewart Entomology and Plant Pathology UT Extension.

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Crops - Commercial. Soybean

HARD RED SPRING WHEAT

2010 U.P. Corn, Small Grain and Forage Performance Trials Introduction Methods Discussion

2016 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Indiana Central [ INCE ] TIPTON Lively Farms, Inc, Monty Lively, Tipton County, IN 46031

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

Winter Oilseed Rape. Irish Recommended List for 2016 Sowing. CROPS EVALUATION and CERTIFICATION DIVISION

2005 Research: Monitoring, Sanitation, and Insect Pest Management in Figs

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

2010 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains

datcp PEST SURVEY rogra 2014 INSECT SURVEYS AND OUTLOOK FOR 2015 KRISTA HAMILTON, DATCP ENTOMOLOGIST

2018 Grain Corn Trial Summaries Genetic Trials

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

VERMONT SAFFRON B.L. Parker - M. Skinner - A. Ghalehgolabbehbahani

Sclerotinia head rot: Improving the methods used to screen sunflowers for resistance and prospects for using fungicides for management

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Determination of Fruit Sampling Location for Quality Measurements in Melon (Cucumis melo L.)

Development of Host-Plant Resistance as a Strategy to Reduce Damage from the Major Sunflower Insect Pests

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE-RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL WALNUT VARIETIES IN THE CENTRAL COAST

2014 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] HARTLEY Clint Van Beek, O'Brien County, IA 51346

Maui Vegetable Notes July 13, 1989

2010 Sunflower Variety Trial Report

2015 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Indiana South [ INSO ] CARLISLE Jeff Mann, Sullivan County, IN 47861

Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids

Contents: Table 1: Precipitation in Chatham, Table 2: Oat Variety Trial. Table 3: Spring Wheat Variety Trial. Table 4: Barley Variety Trial

Insect Control Research for Pecan

2016 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley South [ RRSO ] HAWLEY Mark Kasin, Clay County, MN 56549

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 19 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station. in Sturgeon Bay, WI

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

CHESAPEAKE FARMLINE August 2, 2011

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Statewide Summary: Sorghum Silage Performance, Georgia, 2018 Company or Hybrid or

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley South [ RRSO ] WHEATON Chester Raguse, Traverse County, MN 56583

1 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations E-77-W E-77-W. Field Crops SOYBEAN INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Diagnosing Vegetable Problems

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley South [ RRSO ] ELBOW LAKE Chad Biss, Grant County, MN 56531

Sweet Corn PROCESSOR MARKET CROP GUIDE

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Additional comments su type

2007 Alabama Performance Comparison of Peanut Varieties

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

Some Common Insect Enemies

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Integrated Pest Management for Nova Scotia Grapes- Baseline Survey

Transcription:

Insect Screening Results Multiple Insect Resistance in 79 Commercial Corn Hybrids - 2012 Xinzhi Ni, Michael D. Toews, and G. David Buntin Commercial corn hybrids were screened for ear- and kernel-feeding resistance to insect damage in the field at Tifton, GA. Nine of the top performing 23 hybrids (rated as VG in 2012) were developed utilizing YieldGard VecTran Triple technology (abbreviated as VT3 or VT3P). The hybrids with VT3 contain two Bt genes, while the hybrids with VT3PRO contain a stack of three Bt genes. Insect damage was moderate in the 2012 trial; the six groups of ear- and/or kernelfeeding insects in the order of infestation severity are: corn earworm, fall armyworm, stink bugs, sap beetles, pink scavenger caterpillar, and maize weevil. Multiple species of sap beetles were recorded in 2012. Corn earworm and fall armyworm feeding penetration in corn ears was between 0 and 2.7, which was higher than in 2011 (0-1.7 ), and lower than in 2010 (0.1-3.2 ). Corn earworm and fall armyworm damage was combined because the damage was difficult to separate. Stink bug damage in 2012 was relatively high, ranging from 0 to 5.4% of the kernels per ear. The highest percentage of stink bug-discolored kernels in the previous five ranged between 0.8 and 5.6%. Sap beetle damage was 0-0.3%, and pink scavenger caterpillar damage was 0-0.5% of the kernels in 2012. Losses to pink scavenger caterpillar and sap beetles were based on damage by possibly multiple generations of these insects as the crop matured in the field. Maize weevil infestation at harvest with 18% kernel moisture was low at 0-3 weevils per ear. The moderate insect damage might be related to relatively normal weather conditions in 2012 in comparison with the previous. Because husk tightness and husk extension are considered important traits for earand kernel-feeding insect resistance, the husk features of the sampled ears were also examined in 2012. tightness was assigned using a scale of 1 to 5, in which 1 = very loose and 5 = very tight. Because average rating for husk tightness was between 2.9 and 4.2, only medium (M = 2.9-3.9), and tight (T > 4) ratings are given in the table. extension was between 0.5 and 5.7. Corn earworm damage was negatively correlated to both husk tightness and husk extension in the 2012 data. The combined insect resistance ratings shown in the following table reflected cob damage by both corn earworm and fall armyworm. Multiple insect resistance was categorized in four groups according to the insect damage ratings on corn cobs and kernels; they are very good (VG), good (G), fair (F), and poor (P). VG represents the lowest amount of insect damage, while P represents the greatest amount of insect damage in 2012. The rankings of the 79 hybrids for multiple insect resistance in the table were based on the results of the principal components analysis using corn husk extension and tightness, and damage caused by corn earworm and fall armyworm, stink bugs, sap beetles, pink scavenger caterpillar, and maize weevil. The lettered ratings in the table refer only to relative resistance to insects and are not indicative of yield. Please refer to other reports for yield data. 35

Hybrids resistant to multiple insects are highly recommended for planting and are the most economical means, especially in late plantings, for reducing insect related yield loss, as well as quality loss related to aflatoxin contamination. Consult with your county agent and/or entomologists for additional control recommendations for a specific pest in your area. The trial was planted on the University of Georgia Gibbs Research Farm near Tifton, GA on April 6, 2012, and harvested between August 27 and 30, 2012. Kernel moisture was approximately 18% at harvest. The experimental plots were thinned to 20,000 plants per acre and maintained using local recommended agronomic practices by Penny Tapp and Trevor Perla (USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA). The data were collected by Penny Tapp, Jonathan Roberts, and Joshua Gamblin (USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA). 36

Terral-REV 28HR20 60 1 M VG VG- Croplan Genetics 7131 VT3 58 5 M VG VG Southern States SS 788 GENVT3PRO 56 3 T VG VG Terral-REV 28R10 60 1 M VG VG- Dyna-Gro D55Q80 58 2 T VG VG- Syngenta NK N77P 3111 59 4 M VG VG Croplan Genetics 8410 VT3 PRO 57 2 M VG VG T. A. Seeds TA717-20 57 3 M VG VG T. A. Seeds TA780-13V 58 3 M VG VG Terral-REV 22BHR43 57 5 M VG T. A. Seeds X18692 57 2 M VG. Augusta Seed A6867GTCBLLC 58 1 M VG. T. A. Seeds X18471 58 6 T VG. T. A. Seeds X18496 57 1 T VG. T. A. Seeds X18696 56 2 T VG. T. A. Seeds X18698 57 3 M VG. Dyna-Gro D55VP77 56 2 M VG. AgraTech 654 VT3P 57 2 M VG. AgraTech 843 VT3P 59 2 M VG. AgraTech 925 VT3P 57 3 T VG. Croplan Genetics 8621 VT3 Pro 57 1 M VG. Croplan Genetics 6640 VT3 Pro 56 1 T VG. Southern States SS 67-32 GENVT3P 58 6 M VG. Syngenta NK N82V3000GT 57 1 M G G Terral-REV 26HR50 59 1 M G F Dyna-Gro 57N73 60 3 M G G Pioneer P2023HR 60 2 M G G+ Pioneer P1456HR 58 2 M G G Terral-REV 28HR29 60 1 M G G Croplan Genetics 8505 VT3 PRO 58 7 M G G Dyna-Gro D56VP69 57 1 M G VG- Dyna-Gro D58VP30 58 4 M G VG- Pioneer P2088YHR 59 2 M G G+ Syngenta NK N78S 3111 58 2 M G VG- T. A. Seeds TA765-00 59 2 M G G 37

(Continued) Pioneer P1303HR 59 1 M G. Pioneer P1498HR 57 3 M G. Pioneer P1636YHR 58 2 M G. Pioneer P1690HR 58 0 M G. Terral-REV 21HR33 59 2 M G. Terral-REV 25BHR63 58 1 M G. Terral-REV 26HR23 61 3 M G. Terral-REV 27HR83 59 1 M G. Terral-REV 24BHR93 59 1 M G. DeKalb DKC66-86(GENVT3P) 58 1 M G. DeKalb DKC62-09(GENVT3P) 55 1 M G. T. A. Seeds TA790-20 59 2 M G. T. A. Seeds TA720-20 56 2 M G. T. A. Seeds TA780-00 59 2 M G. T. A. Seeds X17871 57 2 M G. T. A. Seeds X18691 56 1 M G. T. A. Seeds X18693 58 1 T G. T. A. Seeds X18443 57 2 T G. T. A. Seeds X18447 57 1 M G. T. A. Seeds X18694 57 1 M G. T. A. Seeds X18695 58 2 M G. Syngenta NK N82V-3111 58 0 M G. Dyna-Gro D57VP51 56 0 M G. Dyna-Gro CX12 117 57 1 M G. Dyna-Gro D54VP81 56 0 M G. AgraTech 777 GT 59 2 M G. AgraTech 808 GTCBLL 62 3 M G. AgraTech 828 BL 57 1 M G. AgraTech X726 VT3P 56 1 M G. Croplan Genetics 6926 VT3 Pro 56 1 T G. Augusta Seed A0720GTCBLLC 56 1 M G. Augusta Seed A0606GTCBLLC 59 4 M G. Syngenta NK N78N-3111 57 1 M G. Terral-REV 27HR52 59 0 M F G Terral-REV 29HR13 61 1 M F. 38

(Continued) T. A. Seeds TA790-00 58 1 M F. T. A. Seeds X17868 59 3 M F. T. A. Seeds X18697 59 0 M F. AgraTech 817 VT3P 57 1 M F. Southern States SS 63-32 GENVT3P 56 1 M F. Dyna-Gro D56VP24 59 1 M P F- Terral-REV 23RE73 59 0 M P. Syngenta NK N68B-3111 58 1 M P. Greenwood GW 3500 RR 60 0 M P. 1. anthesis is the number of days to flowering at Tifton, GA in 2012 after the hybrids were planted on April 6, 2012. 2. L = loose husk, M = medium-tight husk, T = tight husk. 3. Categorization of insect resistance to key ear-feeding insects (i.e., the corn earworm, the fall armyworm, the stink bugs, the sap beetles, the pink scavenger caterpillar, and the maize weevil) was based on principal components analysis. The data were collected from 20 ears per hybrid (5 ears x 4 replications), where VG = very good, G = good, F = fair, and P = poor. The + and - signs for the average rating represent the inconsistency in the last four (2009-2012). 39