Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Similar documents
Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Report of Progress 961

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Sweet Corn Variety Performance

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Insect Screening Results

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Organic Seed Partnership

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

2012 Guide to Bt Corn for Georgia

Evaluation of Heritage Beans in West Virginia

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Additional comments su type

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2008

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

New Insect Traits in Corn. Glenn Studebaker Extension Entomologist

Southern Illinois Ornamental Corn Variety Trial,

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

European corn borer. Cutworm management. Sweet corn insect pests. Sweet Corn Insect Management. Corn flea beetle management. Western corn rootworms

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana 2013

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

1

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Jade II Bean. Inspiration Bean. Wyatt Bean. Emerald Jewel Broccoli. BC-63 Cabbage 3/21/2012. Must Have Vegetables

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

CHESAPEAKE FARMLINE August 2, 2011

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Maui Vegetable Notes July 13, 1989

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Corn Growth and Development

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

1999 Annual Report. RED-SKINNED AND CHIPPING POTATO VARIETY DEVELOPMENT K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton 1

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2005

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Transcription:

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014 Lewis W. Jett, David Workman, and Brian Sparks West Virginia University According to the 2012 USDA Census, West Virginia produces approximately 750 acres of sweet corn each year (USDA, 2012). Sweet corn acreage can be increased in West Virginia since it has a very long planting window (early May-mid July) combined with a strong demand. Input costs for commercial sweet corn range from $1,500-$2,000/acre, which is relatively low compared with other vegetable and fruit crops (University of Kentucky, 2013). Late-harvested sweet corn (September-October) has a premium market, but the late planting date makes the crop more susceptible to insect infestation. Supersweet (sh 2 ) sweet corn varieties offer the potential of higher quality and longer shelf life compared with traditional sugar-enhanced varieties. One of the limiting factors for expanded retail and regional wholesale marketing of sweet corn is insect management. Buyers demand a high-quality ear with no insect damage. Both corn earworm (CEW) and European corn borer (ECB) are chronic pests of sweet corn. Growers who wish to have high quality, insect-free corn have two options for CEW and ECB management: 1). spraying the plants and silks regularly (typically 3 times/season) with insecticides and, 2). using insect-protected cultivars. The objective of this evaluation was to examine the performance of Attribute Insect-protected sh 2 hybrids (Syngenta) and noninsect-protected sh 2 cultivars in two locations of West Virginia. Materials and Methods Plots were established in late June (22) through early July (2 and 11) with two cooperating growers in Fayette County, WV (silt loam; 38 N lat.) and at the West Virginia University Reymann Memorial Farm in Hardy County, West Virginia (sandy loam; 39 N lat.). Approximately 120 lbs. of N/acre was applied at or before seeding as 46-0-0 or 19-19-19. Fourteen sh 2 cultivars were seeded using a 2-row, plate corn planter or hand-planted in 50-foot long plots. Twelve cultivars were bicolor sh 2 and two were yellow sh 2. Insect-protected (six cultivars) and noninsect-protected (eight cultivars) were interspersed within each field. Each cultivar was replicated a minimum of three times in a randomized complete block design. Final stands averaged 60 plants per 50 feet of row. Rows were approximately 38 inches apart resulting in 16,750 plants per acre. Weeds were controlled using Dual II Magnum at the Hardy County site and cultivation at the other two sites. No insecticides were used for caterpillar control. Five ears were harvested from each plot beginning in early September. The unhusked ears were weighed (including the shank) and later husked to measure quality attributes as well as insect infestation.

Noninsect-protected cv. (30 DAP) Insect-protected cv. (30 DAP) Figure 1. Early season sweet corn had no symptoms of larvae feeding on insect-protected cvs. while noninsect-protected cvs. exhibited leaf and whorl damage. Results and Discussion As expected, nearly all of the noninsect-protected cultivars had infested ears at harvest (Table 1). Late planting typically increases the CEW density. The 2573 Xtra Tender cultivar had significantly less insect damage relative to the other nonprotected lines in two of the three sites. Awesome and Anthem had the highest overall ear weights and quality. The Syngenta Attribute Bt sweet corn hybrids express a single CrylAb toxin that is effective against European corn borer but does not provide complete control of CEW, fall armyworm, or cutworm (Dively, 2012). BC0805, BC0822, BSS0982, and GH0851 have the single gene protection. With no supplemental insecticides, 3-22% infestation was observed at the three sites (Table 1). Previous research has shown that a 50% reduction in the number of standard insecticidal sprays is enough to get nearly full control of corn earworm with these cultivars. BC0805 was an excellent variety at all three sites with large ear weight and quality. The Attribute II sweet corn hybrids have the Vip3AxCrylAb traits, which provide nearly complete control of worms in sweet corn combined with herbicide tolerance. In this trial, BSS30761 and Protector had this level of protection. Protector is a yellow sh 2 variety that yielded well but had only fair eating quality. GH0851 had equal yields but superior eating quality. BSS30761 is an excellent bicolor supersweet variety that consistently had high yields and complete insect resistance at all sites (Figure 2).

Awesome 2573 Xtra Tender BSS30761 Minimal insect infestation observed on unsprayed Attribute cultivars Figure 2. Characteristics of sh 2 varieties evaluated.

Table 1. Marketable yield and quality of insect and noninsect-protected sh 2 sweet corn cultivars. Cultivar Seed Source Ear Weight z (g) Ear Length Ear Diameter Tip Fill y CEW Infestation (%) Noninsect-Protected Location: Fayette County, WV Anthem SW n/a (236) x (17.1) n/a n/a (100) Awesome SW 377 (256) 16.3 5.0 5.0 100 (100) Fantastic SW 320 (n/a) 17.5 5.0 4.8 95 (n/a) Illini - 318 (234) 19.0 4.5 4.0 100 (67) Pickett SW 333 (318) 17.5 4.5 5.0 93 (100) Stellar SW 354 (330) 17.0 5.0 4.9 81 (100) 7143 SW 324 (309) 16.8 5.0 4.7 87 (100) 2573 SW 356 (226) 18.3 5.0 5.0 70 (100) Mean 340 17.5 4.9 4.8 89.4 Insect-Protected BC0805 SY 346 (223) 18.3 4.3 5.0 13.3 (20) BC0822 SY 297 (331) 18.8 4.3 4.0 10.0 (20) BSS0982 SY 365 (381) 18.0 4.5 4.7 22.0 (20) BSS30761 SY 390 (372) 18.3 5.0 4.9 0.0 (0) GH0851 (yellow) SY 300 (348) 18.5 4.5 5.0 0.0 (0) Protector (yellow) SY 318 (261) 18.8 5.0 4.4 0.0 (0) Mean 336 18.5 4.6 4.7 7.6 Standard Error 10.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 7.1 Noninsect-Protected Location: Hardy County, WV Awesome SW 388 17.8 4.8 4.9 86 Anthem SW 380 18.5 4.8 5.0 93 Illini - 370 19.0 4.3 4.5 45 Stellar SW 364 17.5 4.3 4.7 90 2573 SW 369 18.3 4.5 4.7 77 Mean 374 18.2 4.5 4.8 78.2 Insect-Protected BC0805 SY 377 19.8 4.0 4.7 0.0 BC0822 SY 333 18.3 4.5 4.4 0.0 BSS0982 SY 359 18.8 4.5 4.6 3.3 BSS30761 SY 383 18.5 4.3 4.5 0.0 Continued on next page

Table 1 (continued) Cultivar Seed Source Ear Weight z (g) Ear Length Ear Diameter Tip Fill y CEW Infestation (%) Insect-Protected (continued) GH0851 (yellow) SY 374 20.3 4.0 4.9 0.0 Protector (yellow) SY 352 18.5 4.3 4.5 0.0 Mean 363 19.0 4.3 4.6 0.6 Standard Error 4.6 0.1 0.6 0.1 7.6 z Unhusked ear (includes shank). One pound=454 grams (g). y Tip Fill: 5=kernels filled to the tip of the cobb; 4=less than 0.5 inches unfilled; 3=0.5-1 inch unfilled; 2=more than one inch unfilled; 1=more than two inches unfilled. x Site 2 data are in parentheses. Literature Cited Dively, Galen. 2012. Sweet corn insect pest control-what s new and what works. Proc. Mid- Atlantic Fruit and Vegetable Conference, Hershey, PA. University of Kentucky. 2013. Vegetable Enterprise Budgets USDA NASS. 2012. 2012 Ag. Census, West Virginia State and County Data. Acknowledgements We thank the Fox and Haynes family of Fayette County, West Virginia for providing space and labor for this trial. Thanks to SeedWay and Syngenta for providing seed for evaluation. Thanks to the WVU Reymann Memorial Farm crew with help with crop establishment, production, and protection.