Pixel watering of wine grapes in California: Proof-of-concept testing of a modular variable rate irrigation prototype

Similar documents
Variable rate irrigation to manage vineyard variability in California. Brent Sams, Luis Sanchez, Maegan Salinas, Nick Dokoozlian

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

Mechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris. Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural

Joseph G. Alfieri 1, William P. Kustas 1, John H. Prueger 2, Lynn G. McKee 1, Feng Gao 1 Lawrence E. Hipps 3, Sebastian Los 3

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Current and Future Technologies for Wine Grape Crop Estimation

Environmental Monitoring for Optimized Production in Wineries

High Cordon Machine Pruned Trellis Comparison to Three Standard Systems in Lodi

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

Crop Load Management of Young Vines

water & energy exchange

OUTLINE Plan of the talk. Introduction Vineyards are variable in space The efficient vineyard project. The field site in Sonoma Results

Monterey County Ranch Johnson Canyon Road Gonzales, CA Acres

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Geographic Information Systemystem

March 2017 DATA-DRIVEN INSIGHTS FOR VINEYARDS

Airborne Remote Sensing for Precision Viticulture in Niagara. Ralph Brown School of Engineering University of Guelph

ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar

CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE ANNUAL REPORT 2017

The Implications of Climate Change for the Ontario Wine Industry

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

Increasing the efficiency of forecasting winegrape yield by using information on spatial variability to select sample sites

Varieties and Rootstocks in Texas

Vineyards in New Zealand

Deficit Irrigation Scheduling for Quality Winegrapes

South Australia other Regional summary report 2009

Using Less Water and Liking It

IMPOSING WATER DEFICITS TO IMPROVE WINE QUALITY AND REDUCE COSTS

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Healthy Soils for a Sustainable Viticulture John Reganold

Tremain Hatch Vineyard training & design

Chile. Tree Nuts Annual. Almonds and Walnuts Annual Report

Oregon Wine Industry Sustainable Showcase. Gregory V. Jones

Vineyard Water Management

Applied Geomatics--connecting the dots between grapevine physiology,

Overview of vineyard irrigation management and the use of soil monitoring techniques to understand soil moisture dynamics

Rust Stains in Thompson Seedless Grapes Association to cracking induced by pesticides

START OF VINEYARD EVALUATION SHEETS SUMMARY EVALUATION SHEETS VINEYARD 3. VITICULTURE V/W Pg # N/A

Understanding Seasonal Nutritional Requirements

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Inherent Characteristics Affecting Balance of Common Footill Grape Varieties

Your headline here in Calibri.

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

Late season leaf health CORRELATION OF VINEYARD IMAGERY WITH PINOT NOIR YIELD AND VIGOUR AND FRUIT AND WINE COMPOSITION. 6/22/2010

Vineyard & Winery Management Mar/Apr

Coffee weather report November 10, 2017.

Kelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute

Pepper Bridge Winery AMAVI CELLARS

INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE RELATIONSHIPS OF STRESS AND LEAF HEALTH OF THE GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA L.) ON GRAPE AND WINE QUALITIES

FOR SALE VINEYARD AND OPEN LAND ACRES WALLACE ROAD KERN COUNTY CA

MONTES DRY FARMING PROJECT. October, 2014

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

BACKGROUNDER: GRAPE GROWING IN THE ARIZONA DESERT

Armour Ridge Vineyard

RED LAKE VINEYARD ESTATE

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Practical Aspects of Crop Load and Canopy Management

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

Irrigation of Sunflowers in Northwestern Kansas

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Interaction of applied water amounts and leaf removal in the fruiting zone on grapevine water relations and productivity of Merlot

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Chapter 3 Microcatchment water harvesting systems for fruit trees and shrubs

Vineyard Site Evaluation For: Beringer

Irrigation management and Vineyard Sustainability. Maximizing yields and grape quality with limited water

Elderberry Ripeness and Determination of When to Harvest. Patrick Byers, Regional Horticulture Specialist,

Irrigation Management of Winegrapes with a Limited Water Supply

Kevin Sass Moderator Winemaker Halter Ranch Vineyards

CANOPY MANAGEMENT AND VINE BALANCE

Vineyard Site Selection and Layout. Dean Volenberg UW-Extension Door County

2018 Vineyard Economics Survey

RIDGE VINEYARDS Harvest Report from Monte Bello

Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Management of Macrophomina and Fusarium with fumigants and non-fumigant treatments

Sustainable oenology and viticulture: new strategies and trends in wine production

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Quality of western Canadian lentils 2011

Coonawarra Wine Region. Regional summary report WINEGRAPE UTILISATION AND PRICING SURVEY 2007

Nord Ridge Vineyards 1540 Howell Mountain Road Napa, CA. Presented By: Mark Stevens, Broker

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Growing Cabernet Sauvignon at Wynns Coonawarra Estate

Studying the grapevine water stress in the digital era: from sensor-based irrigation scheduling to in-vivo visualization techniques

cabernet sauvignon pairing recommendation Grilled steak. Apellation Alcohol Curicó Valley 13% by Vol. 4.7 ± 0.3 g/lt < 4 g/lt

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

Quality of western Canadian lentils 2012

Effects of Plastic Covers on Canopy Microenvironment and Fruit Quality. Matthew Fidelibus Viticulture & Enology UC Davis

IRRIGATION OF GRAPEVINES IN CALIFORNIA

New York s revitalized grapevine certification program and New York nurseries. Marc Fuchs Associate Professor Cornell University

Optimization of Water Use in Vineyards in the Okanagan Using Precision Irrigation FINAL REPORT

Impacts of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes and Wine

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Resistant Varieties: New Perspectives for a More Sustainable Viticulture

Neighborhood Vineyards Proposal for Alemany Farm April 16, 2013

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Deep Percolation from Surface Irrigated Water Intensive Crop Fields

Transcription:

Pixel watering of wine grapes in California: Proof-of-concept testing of a modular variable rate irrigation prototype Luis Sanchez, InfoAg July 28, 2015

Variable vineyards Plant Available Water Colony 13 Petite Sirah

How can we manage vineyard variability? Through Precision Viticulture: Management to optimize vineyard performance Responding to field variability Maximizing grape yield and quality Minimizing environmental footprint

Precision Viticulture Variable rate irrigation Sensor-driven systems in potted plants (and vines?) Center pivot systems in grain crops Management zones in wine grapes Australia (McClymont et al. 2012; Proffitt and Pearce 2004) Spain (Bellvert et al. 2012; Martínez-Casasnovas et al. 2009) California

Zonal Irrigation Soil 1 Soil 2

Zonal Irrigation Irrigation management zone 1 Irrigation management zone 1 VF PUMP

Zonal Irrigation Irrigation management zone 1 Irrigation management zone 1 Soil 3 VF PUMP

Modular Irrigation Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3

Modular Irrigation Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

Modular Irrigation Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

Modular Irrigation Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

Modular Irrigation Wine Program A Wine Program B VF PUMP

Variable Rate Irrigation Study Objective: Develop and operate a proof-of-concept VRI system prototype and validate it by: Decreasing vineyard variability Optimizing fruit yield and quality Increasing water use efficiency

Experiment location Colony Ranch, Wilton CA

2012 yield map Colony 2A Cabernet Sauvignon Wilton, California 31.5 acres 5 x 11 feet 17-year old Teleki 5C Hand-pruned Drip-irrigated San Joaquin silt loam (~ 75%) San Joaquin-Galt complex (~ 25%) 500 mm (20 ) annual rainfall Highly variable 2012 Yield tons per acre 12 Block area: 31.5 acres VRI & CI: 10.0 acres Field average: 9.17 tons/acre 9 6 3

Field layout Landsat data 2012 Yield tons per acre 12 Block area: 31.5 acres VRI & CI: 10.0 acres Field average: 9.17 tons/acre 9 6 3 30 meter Variable Rate Irrigation VRI Conventional Irrigation CI 140 Irrigation Zones

General layout 5 DL 4 DL 5 DL 4 DL 5 DL 4 DL Node-Solenoid, Check Valve, Tee Flow meter Flushing solenoid valve 5 DL 4 DL 5 DL Sub-main Valves 4 DL 5 DL 4 DL 5 DL 4 DL Variable Flow Pump

System design solenoid valve check valve emitters Tubing, 0.69 ID 4 emitters Check valve 2 Power loc tee 2 Solenoid valve Power loc adapter emitters

System design

Control board 480 VAC Power distribution box Control box UPS box Cell Antenna 115 VAC Lightning arrestor 12 VDC to 14 subnets Communications to South and North

Irrigation scheduling METRIC (Mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution and internalized calibration) ET residual of surface energy balance Rn + LE + G + H = 0 Inputs Landsat (visible & infrared) CIMIS weather data Outputs ETc Kc (f/ndvi) Watering of each zone: ETc = ETref * Kc * Km Rn H G LE

2013 irrigation management 2012 yield tons/acre (average = 8.9) # of irrigation zones Irrigation management factor May 4 weeks June 4 weeks July - Oct 16 weeks < 8.9 76 1.2 0.5 0.7 > 8.9 64 no irrigation 0.5 0.7

2014 irrigation management # of irrigation zones Irrigation management factor May 4 weeks June 4 weeks July - Oct 16 weeks 140 0.0-0.7 0.5 0.8 0.6 1.0

VRI Yield - Normalized 2012 Yield: Mean = 8.9 t/ac 6.1 12.4 t/ac Range = 6.3 2013 Yield: Mean = 7.7 t/ac 6.3 8.9 t/ac Range = 2.6 2014 Yield: Mean = 10.2 t/ac 6.2 14.0 t/ac Range = 7.8

CI Yield - Normalized 2012 Yield: Mean = 8.9 t/ac 6.4 10.9 t/ac Range = 4.5 2013 Yield: Mean = 7.41 t/ac 5.8 10.7 t/ac Range = 4.9 2014 Yield: Mean = 8.7 t/ac 6.1 14.3 t/ac Range = 8.2

20 9 50 7 59 41 69 80 52 16 26 11 1 5 53 83 55 54 23 4 3 124 39 38 47 100 71 81 78 88 73 131 75 111 84 122 85 108 129 118 103 113 104 133 117 115 135 Conv Scheduled Water (hours/year) 2013 applied water 700 600 Variable rate average Conventional average Scheduled 2013 Variable Rate and Conventional Irrigation Areas 500 400 300 200 100 Water Use Efficiency Variable Rate = 17.2 kg/mm Conventional = 15.1 kg/mm 0 Irrigation Zone

37 36 17 7 35 49 55 41 59 51 19 43 53 22 20 14 91 92 13 2 47 38 28 140 77 64 78 61 71 87 30 84 96 95 99 132 101 102 123 110 108 125 105 115 130 117 129 CI Scheduled Water (hours/year) 2014 applied water 700 600 Variable rate average Conventional average Scheduled 2014 Variable Rate and Conventional Irrigation Areas 500 400 300 200 100 Water Use Efficiency Variable Rate = 22.7 kg/mm Conventional = 21.9 kg/mm 0 Irrigation Zone

Non-spatial statistics Irrigation Variable rate Conventional Yield class Leaf Area Index clusters per vine cluster weight (g) berry weight (g) high 6.0 a 147.7 a 76.0 a 0.9 ab medium 5.3 a 127.7 a 84.7 a 0.8 b low 5.2 a 127.7 a 71.6 a 0.7 c high 6.1 a 151.6 a 81.9 a 1.0 a medium 6.1 a 155.6 a 75.7 a 0.8 b low 6.1 a 130.2 a 66.1 a 0.7 bc Different letters are significantly different at p<0.05

Conclusions Successful modular variable rate irrigation system prototype implementation Precise manipulation of vineyard variability Maintaining high water use efficiency

Next steps Continue testing prototype until year 5 Second generation system underway Multiple vineyards Other permanent crops Commercial level system Cost effectiveness

Next steps B6 B5 A6 B4 A5 Controllers B1-B6 valves and water meter A1-A6 valves and water meter B1 B2 A1 B3 A2 A3 A4 Solar panel charged battery

Acknowledgments E&J Gallo Winery Viticulture Lab: Brent Sams, Maegan Salinas, Erin Troxell, Shijian Zhuang, Nona Ebisuda Chemistry: Hui Chong, Bruce Pan, Natalia Loscos Research Winery: David Santino, Bianca Wiens, Steven Kukesh GIS-CE: Martin Mendez, Andrew Morgan Nick Dokoozlian IBM (TJ Watson Lab & Data Center Services) TJ Watson Lab, NY: Levente Klein, Nigel Hinds, Hendrik Hamann Data Services, CA: Alan Claassen, David Lew James Taylor, New Castle University, UK Ernie and Jeff Dosio, Pacific Agrilands Scott Britten and Associates, Bennett & Bennett

Thank you!

GQI Yield (tons/hectare) Fruit Yield and Quality 25 20 VRI CI 15 10 5 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 a a a b a b a 2012 2013 2014 VRI CI a a a a 2012 2013 2014 b

GQI 2014 Leafing study LV / NL = Low vigor, No Leafing 75 Colony 2A Cabernet Sauvignon 70 65 60 55 50 LV / NL HV / NL HV / L LAI HV / L = High vigor, Leafing HV / NL = High vigor, No Leafing

Non-spatial statistics VRI CI CV Spread CV Spread 2012 0.14 0.71 0.12 0.50 2013 0.07 0.33 0.12 0.68 2014 0.17 0.76 0.15 0.93 CV = STDEV/MEAN SPREAD = RANGE/MEDIAN

Spatial statistics 1. MCD, Mean Correlation Distance 2. Cambardella Index Measures of spatial dependence and structure Variable Rate Irrigation: Decreased spatial structure in 2013 Increased spatial structure in 2014

Hectares Mapped 2012 320 Yield Monitor Yield 2013 Mapping 1,600 2014 4,800