Sweet Corn Variety Performance

Similar documents
2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Tomato Variety Performance in High Tunnels

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana 2013

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2006

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2008

Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Additional comments su type

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2005

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2004

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Jade II Bean. Inspiration Bean. Wyatt Bean. Emerald Jewel Broccoli. BC-63 Cabbage 3/21/2012. Must Have Vegetables

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

osu 1986 VEGETABLE CULTIVAR EVALUATIONS * GREEN WRAP TOMATOES * FRESH MARKET STAKED TOMATOES * SUPER SWEET CORN * NORMAL SWEET CORN

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

N. Y. S PROCESSING SWEET CORN VARIETY REPLICATED AND OBSERVATION (su and supersweet type) TRIAL SUMMARY

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

2014 Oilseed Meal as a Fertility Amendment in Sweet Corn

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

OHIO. SfA1E SWEET CORN CULTIV AR EVALUATIONS Richard L. Hassell Horticulture & Crop Science OARDC/OSU Wooster, OH '

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

1

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Evaluation of Summer Cabbage for Tolerance to Onion Thrips. Christy Hoepting & Katie Klotzbach Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

FOR GRADING FLORIDA SWEET CORN

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

2009 Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group Heirloom Tomato Project Summary Indiana

Nutrient Management With Cover Crops. Darryl Warncke Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Report of Progress 961

Pecan Production 101: Sunlight, Crop Load Management, Pollination. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

N.Y.S Processing Sweet Corn Variety Replicated and Observation (su and supersweet Types) Trial Summary

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Lettuce Cultivar Observation Trial 2013

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials 2014

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Transcription:

Sweet Corn Variety Performance Liz Maynard and Erin Bluhm Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Jan. 4, 2018 Illiana Vegetable Growers Symposium Schererville, Indiana

Where : Pinney Purdue Agriculture Center in Wanatah, IN Supersweets (sh2) planted May 16, first harvest July 31 Sugar-enhanced/synergistic (se) planted May 30, first harvest Aug 4 Tracy Sandy Loam soil Fertilizer : 40 lbs./a preplant from urea on April 12 60 lbs./a N sidedress from UAN on June 7 (no P or K based on Fall 2016 soil testing) Population 20,328 plants per acre (intended) Single-row plots 30 ft. long, 30 in. apart, 3 replications, randomized block design

PPAC Weather Summary 2017 May 15 August 6 Average temp: 69.5 F 0.2 F above normal Total Precipitation: 11.53 inches 0.27 inches above normal Growing Degree Days: 1666 53 above normal Source : USDA NASS 2017 Indiana Crop Progress and Condition report

sh2 supersweet Harris Moran Syngenta Crookham Stokes Rosie BSS 0761 Yellowstone (y) Anthem Elle (y) BSS 1075 Everglades American Dream Raquel BSS 8021 Eden (w) Hero XR Kate WSS 8072 (w) Nirvana Cumberland CAPBF 12-525 CSHBP 13-672 AP 426

Grading and Weighing Number and weight of all marketable and fancy ears Husk cover Husk tightness Tip fill Flag length Overall attractiveness Ear diameter Ear length Shank length Ear flavor and (sh2 only) pericarp toughness

Tip Fill : length of cob not filled 5 = 0 4 = 0 to ½ 3 = ½ to 1 2 = < 1 1 = > 2

Husk Cover : length of Husk beyond Ear 5 = > 2 4 = 1 ¼ to 2 3 = ¾ to 1 ¼ 2 = < ¾ 1 = Ear exposed

Early Vigor Rating: 1 (low) to 9 (high) Scale 7 2 6 8 Good early vigor (>6.7): Anthem, Hero XR, Rosie, Raquel, Yellowstone Low early vigor (<4.3): BSS 0761, Eden, AP 426, Nirvana

Hero XR Days to Harvest predicted 71 actual 76 Marketable Ears 1,404 doz./a 7.8 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.92 lb. length 7.22 in. diam. 1.90 in.

HC 5.0 TF 4.9 91.3% Fancy EVigor 8.3 Hero XR JRTICULh.JRE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Raquel Days to Harvest predicted 72 actual 76 Marketable Ears 1,145 doz./a 7.5 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.10 lb. length 8.58 in. diam. 2.14 in.

HC 3.4 TF 4.7 62.3% Fancy EVigor 6.7 Raquel JRTICULh.JRE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Nirvana Days to Harvest predicted 74 actual 76-78 Marketable Ears 1,533 doz./a 7.1 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.77 lb. length 7.75 in. diam. 1.96 in.

HC 2.9 TF 4.3 39.9% Fancy EVigor 4.3 Nirvana HORTICULTURE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

American Dream Days to Harvest predicted 77 actual 78-80 Marketable Ears 1,258 doz./a 5.4 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.74 lb. length 6.75 in. diam. 1.89 in.

HC 3.8 TF 4.4 64.6% Fancy EVigor 5.3 JRTICULT RE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Anthem Days to Harvest predicted 73 actual 78-80 Marketable Ears 1,242 doz./a 6.6 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.91 lb. length 7.61 in. diam. 2.06 in.

I HC 4.0 TF 4.8 72.1% Fancy EVigor 8.3 Anthem J RTIC U LPTEI!: ~th ITECT URE L NDSCA

Rosie Days to Harvest predicted 74 actual 78-80 Marketable Ears 1,194 doz./a 8.0 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.11 lb. length 8.06 in. diam. 2.21 in.

HC 3.6 TF 3.8 68.5% Fancy EVigor 6.7 JRTICULh.JRE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Cumberland Days to Harvest predicted 77 actual 78-80 Marketable Ears 1,210 doz./a 7.3 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.01 lb. length 7.94 in. diam. 2.04 in.

f HC 3.6 TF 5.0 75.3% Fancy EVigor 6.3 Cumberland JRTICULT RE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CAPBF 12-525 Days to Harvest predicted 72 actual 78-80 Marketable Ears 1,323 doz./a 7.1 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.90 lb. length 7.71 in. diam. 2.00 in.

HC 3.7 TF 4.1 56.8% Fancy EVigor 4.7 JRTICULT RE & RE L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTU

Everglades Days to Harvest predicted 76 actual 80-83 Marketable Ears 1,629 doz./a 8.3 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.85 lb. length 7.89 in. diam. 1.94 in.

HC 3.6 TF 4.0 54.4% Fancy EVigor 8.0 Everglades 14 JRTICULT RE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Kate Days to Harvest predicted 77 actual 80-85 Marketable Ears 1,339 doz./a 8.4 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.05 lb. length 7.79 in. diam. 2.10 in.

- HC 4.1 TF 3.9 68.8% Fancy EVigor 6.3 Kate ~11. 601. '/18. sos ULTURE &.APE ARCHITECTURE

BSS 8021 Days to Harvest predicted 78 actual 80-85 Marketable Ears 1,162 doz./a 6.4 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.92 lb. length 7.44 in. diam. 1.88 in.

HC 4.7 TF 5.0 76% Fancy EVigor 4.7 BSS 8021 515, 618, 713. 808 [ I l s 8-q- 11 0\l ~mili:"":"'.:11---- ~--IJS!lllllm!IPt E x T E N s 1 ON PURDUE I HORTICULTURE & l AN 0 SCAPE ARCHITECTURE

AP 426 Days to Harvest predicted 78 actual 80-85 Marketable Ears 1,533 doz./a 8.7 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.95 lb. length 7.64 in. diam. 1.94 in.

HC 5.0 TF 4.2 80.8% Fancy EVigor 4.3 AP426 J RTIC U LTEI!: ~th ITECT URE L NDSCAP

CSHBP 13-672 Days to Harvest predicted 80 actual 80-87 Marketable Ears 1,210 doz./a 10.3 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.42 lb. length 9.21 in. diam. 2.10 in.

HC 3.9 TF 3.9 84.7% Fancy EVigor 6.3 CSH BP 13-672 PURDUE I HORTICULTURE & EXTENSION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

BSS 0761 Days to Harvest predicted 80 actual 85-87 Marketable Ears 1,242 doz./a 7.7 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.03 lb. length 7.75 in. diam. 2.03 in.

HC 3.7 TF 4.2 67.6% Fancy EVigor 2.7 BSS 0761 509 61'/ 708, 80b '---~ PURDUE I HORTICULTURE & EXTENSION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

BSS 1075 Days to Harvest predicted 77 actual 85-87 Marketable Ears 1,468 doz./a 9.0 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.03 lb. length 7.82 in. diam. 2.00 in.

HC 3.8 TF 4.7 52.6% Fancy EVigor 4.7 501. 620. 707, 807 t lrticulture & AijOSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Yellowstone Days to Harvest predicted 76 actual 80-83 Marketable Ears 1,500 doz./a 7.9 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.88 lb. length 7.54 in. diam. 1.86 in.

HC 4.3 TF 4.3 65.8% Fancy EVigor 6.7 JRTICULT RE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Elle Days to Harvest predicted 78 actual 83-87 Marketable Ears 1,307 doz./a 8.3 ton/a Average Ear weight 1.06 lb. length 8.13 in. diam. 2.03 in.

HC 3.8 TF 4.0 64.8% Fancy EVigor 4.7 Elle s1e. 611. 706. eoi

Eden Days to Harvest predicted 75 actual 76-80 Marketable Ears 1,629 doz./a 7.1 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.72 lb. length 7.56 in. diam. 1.97 in.

HC 3.1 TF 3.9 28.2% Fancy EVigor 4.3 Eden 513. 607. 71 }, 815 J RTIC U LPTEI! ~ ~th ITECT URE L NDSCA "

WSS 8072 Days to Harvest predicted 78 actual 83 Marketable Ears 1,210 doz./a 6.6 ton/a Average Ear weight 0.91 lb. length 7.63 in. diam. 1.97 in.

HC 4.0 TF 4.9 65.8% Fancy EVigor 6.3 wss 8072 SW. 604, 701. $09 WSS 8072 JRTICULT RE & L NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Acknowledgments Seed Companies Crookham High Mowing Seeds HM Clause Stokes Syngenta Pinney Purdue Ag Center Staff and Vegetable Crew Full report available online at the Purdue Education Store, edustore.purdue.edu/item.asp?item_number=16-18-17-w or tinyurl.com/mwvtr