Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Similar documents
West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Choosing and caring for your Harris Moran pumpkins

Evaluation of Heritage Beans in West Virginia

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2006

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

2017 North Carolina and Tennessee Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations Hort. Series # 219

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Organic Seed Partnership

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Southern California Strawberry Cultivar Updates Kirk Larson Pomologist/Strawberry Specialist UC Davis/UC South Coast REC

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Strawberry Variety Trial

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Jade II Bean. Inspiration Bean. Wyatt Bean. Emerald Jewel Broccoli. BC-63 Cabbage 3/21/2012. Must Have Vegetables

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Maui Vegetable Notes July 13, 1989

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008

1

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Blueberries: Wonderful fruit & Great Ornamentals

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Growing cucumbers in high tunnels

What is Saffron? Saffron is the dry stigma of Crocus sativus L. flowers. Flowering: autumn. In cultivation for over 3,500 yr

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Demonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Summary of Grape Variety and Rootstock Performance Data Oklahoma Fruit and Pecan Research Station Perkins, OK

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide.

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Making Better Decisions

LOWER HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Southern California Strawberry Research Update. Kirk Larson Pomologist/Strawberry Specialist UC Davis/UC South Coast REC

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Department of Horticulture ~ The Ohio State University

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Transcription:

2016-17 Pumpkin Evaluations in West Virginia Lewis W. Jett1 West Virginia University G215 Agriculture Science Building; Morgantown, WV 26506 Lewis.Jett@mail.WVU.edu Pumpkins (Cucurbita sp. L.) are a very popular fall ornamental crop in West Virginia. Each year, new commercial cultivars are released and growers must choose the appropriate cultivars for their respective markets. Materials and Methods Twenty-eight pumpkin cultivars were evaluated at the WVU Kearneysville Research Farm in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia (Figure 1). The soil had a base ph of 7.2. Prior to planting, 80 lbs. of N, P2O5 and K2O were applied to the test plot area ( 0.7 acres). The pumpkin cultivars were seeded into 50-cell transplant trays and grown as transplants for 3 weeks before being hand-planted on June 28, 2016. Pumpkins were direct seeded on June 20, 2017. We used biodegradable black plastic mulch for weed control. In addition, one cultivation was performed between beds to control weeds before vine closure. Each plot was 20-25 feet long with 6-7 feet between rows and 3 feet between plants resulting in 2000 plants/acre. This was a relatively compact spacing, but given the soil quality, it was determined that this would be an average spacing for all cultivars. Standard pest management practices were employed including powdery mildew prevention. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with 4 replications per cultivar. Marketable fruit were harvested on October 4-14, 2016 and 2017 and sorted into marketable and nonmarketable before weighing and measuring quality variables such as color and ribbing. Results and Discussion Figure 1. Thirty-two pumpkin cultivars were evaluated at the West Virginia University Kearneysville Farm in 2016 and 2017. 1 State Extension Horticulture Specialist, West Virginia University;

Table 1. Total marketable yield and fruit per acre for selected pumpkin cultivars in West Virginia- 2016. Mkt (%) Marketable pumpkins/acre Avg. Wt. (lbs.) Wt./acre (tons) (No.) Ares 87.5 2963 17.9 4.3 Bayhorse Gold 92.4 2889 14.8 3.6 Bellatrix 96.0 3778 16.3 4.0 Camaro 85.8 3629 17.8 4.3 Capt. Jack 86.7 844 21.6 5.2 Cargo 100.0 3778 12.2 3.0 Challenger 100.0 2222 18.1 4.4 Champion 97.3 2667 20.0 4.8 Cronus 95.0 1259 18.8 4.5 Eagle City Gold 97.7 3185 12.3 3.0 Earlipack 55.0 815 15.4 2.8 Early King 96.8 2296 20.7 5.0 El Capitan 96.7 2222 13.7 3.3 El Toro 93.1 2148 17.4 4.2 Gladiator 86.5 2740 13.3 3.2 Gold Challenger 100.0 2741 15.7 3.8 Hannibal 98.2 4074 15.9 3.9 Honky Tonk 100.0 4578 12.4 3.0 Hulk 97.9 3481 22.0 5.3 Kratos 100.0 2296 16.7 4.1 Magic Lantern 98.1 3926 14.0 3.4 Magic Wand 100.0 3654 13.1 3.2 Mrs. Wrinkles 98.0 3556 14.6 3.5 Orange Rave 98.1 3778 12.2 3.0 Rhea 100.0 2222 15.2 3.7 Solid Gold 92.0 1852 16.6 4.1 Spartan 97.3 2741 17.2 4.2 Zeus 96.8 2296 13.0 3.2 Significance (0.05) : 137.6 0.3 0.2

Table 2. Total marketable yield and fruit per acre for selected pumpkin cultivars in West Virginia- 2017. Mkt (%) Marketable pumpkins/acre Avg. Wt. (lbs.) Wt./acre (tons) (No.) Ares 95 1817 25.5 21.2 Bayhorse Gold 95 3025 21.8 33.9 Big Loretta 97 1815 35.1 23.1 Camaro 65 3126 20.7 33.2 Cargo 83 2016 20.3 21.5 Challenger 75 2218 27.9 28.7 Champion 95 2823 31.0 43.1 Eagle City Gold 80 1916 22.2 26.1 Earlipack 89 1412 19.2 13.7 Early King 100 2420 23.9 28.8 Eros 95 2823 16.9 20.2 Gladiator 75 1714 20.1 17.2 Gold Challenger 68 1916 17.6 17.5 Hannibal 89 1882 21.3 15.9 Honky Tonk 100 2420 16.9 21.4 Hulk 82 1311 26.8 17.4 Kratos 98 2823 25.8 36.5 Magic Lantern 90 2118 20.2 20.4 Magic Wand 56 940 21.7 10.4 Mrs. Wrinkles 96 3025 19.2 28.9 Orange Rave 88 3055 19.9 29.8 Orange Sunrise 98 4437 18.6 40.9 Rhea 95 2151 19.1 20.6 Secretariat 83 2521 12.3 16.5 Solid Gold 92 2622 19.3 24.9 Spartan 85 2622 14.6 19.6 Thor 95 2218 20.9 22.4 Zeus 100 1748 18.9 16.8 Significance (0.05) : 106 0.5 1.2

Average weight ranged from 12-22 lbs. (Table 1; 2). The spacing used in this study probably reduced average fruit weight, however all of the varieties were equally spaced and relative differences in weight should be consistent across all of the varieties evaluated. Within the range of 12-15 lbs., cultivars such as Honky Tonk, Mrs. Wrinkles, and Secretariat had significantly greater yields/acre. These cultivars had a dark orange color with excellent ribbing on the fruit which made the pumpkins particularly attractive to customers based on informal test marketing at the WVU Student Farm. For fruit weight greater than15 lbs., Ares Bellatrix, Camaro, Eros, Hulk, Hannibal, Bayhorse Gold, Orange Rave, Orange Sunrise, and Spartan were excellent varieties with dark orange color and excellent fruit quality Orange Sunrise was the highest yielding cultivar in 2017. Ares and Hulk were excellent tall pumpkins with good color and stem quality. Champion was a large pumpkin with high yields but had poor handle quality. Bayhorse Gold had very high yields in both 2016 and 2017 with excellent quality. Orange Sunrise was a very high quality pumpkin with early harvest and excellent yields (Table 3). Eros is a mid-size pumpkin with excellent color and yield.

Table 3. Color and quality ratings of pumpkin cultivars evaluated in West Virginia, Days to harvest z Color y Ribbing x Comments Big Loretta 105 DO 3.5 Large pumpkin with good handle quality Cargo 100 DO 4.7 Intermediate resistance to PM w Capt. Jack 105 MO 3.9 22-30 lbs. avg.; large handle Early King 90 MO 3.2 21-26 lbs.; tall pumpkin with dark orange color Eagle City Gold 100 MO 3.5 Medium-high yields Gold Challenger 105 MO 4.0 Medium orange; good ribbing Solid Gold 100 DO 3.6 17-22 lbs. Hulk 100 DO 4.3 Large; tall pumpkin; 20-25 lbs. Camaro 110 LO 2.3 Light orange with excellent PM w tolerance Magic Lantern 100 DO 4.5 Excellent uniformity with PM tolerance Mrs. Wrinkles 100 DO 5.0 Dark orange with deep ribbing Challenger 110 MO 4.3 18-20 lbs.; good color and PM tolerance Champion 90 DO 4.4 20 lbs.; poor handle quality Gladiator 115 DO 4.4 Excellent PM tolerance with good color Ares 115 DO 3.9 Excellent tall pumpkin with good color Eros 100 DO 3.2 Medium-size pumpkin with uniform weight Earlipack 100 MO 3.3 Poor yields Hannibal 105 DO 4.5 16-20 lbs.; very uniform; good ribbing Honky Tonk 100 DO 4.6 Very good yields 10-12 lb. fruit; dark orange Bellatrix 95 DO 4.2 Excellent yields 16-18 lbs. Cronus 100 DO 4.9 Large pumpkin with good ribbing and dark color El Toro 110 MO 3.7 17-25 lbs. pumpkin; medium orange Bayhorse Gold 100 DO 4.2 15-16 lbs. pumpkin weight; good yields Orange Rave 100 DO 3.7 Excellent color, yield and uniformity Orange Sunrise 85 DO 4.0 Early-season pumpkin with excellent quality and yield. Kratos 100 DO 4.1 Medium orange; thick handles Rhea 100 DO 4.2 Dark orange pumpkin with good ribbing Secretariat 105 MO 4.1 Medium orange with good ribbing Spartan 100 DO 4.7 17-20 lb. fruit; dark orange Thor 105 MO 4.0 Medium orange with medium ribbing Magic Wand 115 DO 4.5 12-15 lb. pumpkins; dark orange with good ribbing El Capitan 100 MO 3.6 15-20 lb. fruit; medium orange Zeus 110 DO 3.5 15-20 lb. fruit; dark orange Significance (0.05) 0.1 z Days from seeding y DO=Dark Orange; MO=Medium Orange; LO=Light Orange x Ribbing: 1-5; 1=poor/no ribbing; 5=excellent ribbing w PM=Powdery mildew Acknowledgements: The Author would like to than Dr. Elsa Sanchez, The Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Horticulture for providing seed for this evaluation. In addition, I thank Farm Staff at the WVU Kearneysville Farm for assistance in planting and plot maintenance.