TRTP and TRTA in BDS Application per CDISC ADaM Standards Maggie Ci Jiang, Teva Pharmaceuticals, West Chester, PA

Similar documents
Carole Bingley Customer Focused, Science Driven, Results Led

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Activity 10. Coffee Break. Introduction. Equipment Required. Collecting the Data

Streamlining Food Safety: Preventive Controls Brings Industry Closer to SQF Certification. One world. One standard.

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

The aim of the thesis is to determine the economic efficiency of production factors utilization in S.C. AGROINDUSTRIALA BUCIUM S.A.

UNIT TITLE: TAKE FOOD ORDERS AND PROVIDE TABLE SERVICE NOMINAL HOURS: 80

BarkeepOnline Managing Recipes

MW Exam Review Day. Paper Two. Prepared by Neil Tully MW. 3rd November 2009

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

Pasta Market in Italy to Market Size, Development, and Forecasts

Bishop Druitt College Food Technology Year 10 Semester 2, 2018

Barista at a Glance BASIS International Ltd.

Overview. PPL3PC19 - SQA Unit Code HK Prepare, process and finish marzipan, pastillage and sugar products

United States Electric Skillets Industry 2016 Market Research Report

Step 1: Prepare To Use the System

August 18, BY U.S. Mail and to scott,petersonsstgb,org

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

European Vitamin B9 (Folic Acid) Industry 2016 Market Research Report

City and County of San Francisco DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Esri Demographic Data Release Notes: Israel

Administration Table of Contents

HACCP. Hazard Analysis Critical. For The Food Service Worker

Release Letter. Trufa

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

Sponsored by: Center For Clinical Investigation and Cleveland CTSC

Introduction to the Practical Exam Stage 1. Presented by Amy Christine MW, DC Flynt MW, Adam Lapierre MW, Peter Marks MW

Missing Data Treatments

Prepare and serve wines. unit 614

Global Champagne Industry 2015 Market Research Report

Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation

Predicting Fruitset Model Philip Schwallier, Amy Irish- Brown, Michigan State University

Improving allergy outcomes. IgE and IgG 4 food serology in a Gastroenterology Practice. Jay Weiss, Ph.D and Gary Kitos, Ph.D., H.C.L.D.

Youth Explore Trades Skills

Unit title: Fermented Patisserie Products (SCQF level 7)

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

NOMINAL HOURS: UNIT NUMBER: UNIT DESCRIPTOR:

FOR PERSONAL USE. Capacity BROWARD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCIENCE BENCHMARK PLAN ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT OPPORTUNITIES. Grade 3 Quarter 1 Activity 2

Semantic Web. Ontology Engineering. Gerd Gröner, Matthias Thimm. Institute for Web Science and Technologies (WeST) University of Koblenz-Landau

WACS culinary certification scheme

Washington Vineyard Acreage Report: 2011

Overview. PPL2PC23 - SQA Unit Code HK Prepare, cook and finish basic bread and dough products

UNIT TITLE: PREPARE HOT, COLD AND FROZEN DESSERT NOMINAL HOURS: 55

Fairfield Public Schools Family Consumer Sciences Curriculum Food Service 30

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Roaster/Production Operative. Coffee for The People by The Coffee People. Our Values: The Role:

Culinary Arts Level 1 Prep Cook

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

Introduction to the Practical Exam Stage 1

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Compare Measures and Bake Cookies

Improving Enquiry Point and Notification Authority Operations

China Sanitary Napkins Industry 2016 Market Research Report

Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology

Board of Management Staff Students and Equalities Committee

UNIT TITLE: PLAN, PREPARE AND DISPLAY A BUFFET SERVICE NOMINAL HOURS: 45

Shaping the Future: Production and Market Challenges

The Roles of Social Media and Expert Reviews in the Market for High-End Goods: An Example Using Bordeaux and California Wines

GENERAL FOODS GUIDELINES FOR ALL MEMBERS

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

Introduction: Form E. Page 1 of 21

Notes on the Philadelphia Fed s Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists (RTDSM) Capacity Utilization. Last Updated: December 21, 2016

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA To be competent you must achieve the following:

Route List Configuration

AWARD: Pulse Hospitality Operations Agreement 2016

Revised April Unit/Standard Number. High School Graduation Years 2017, 2018 and 2019

Cafeteria Ordering System, Release 1.0

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

Increasing Toast Character in French Oak Profiles

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM BINA NUSANTARA UNIVERSITY. Major Marketing Sarjana Ekonomi Thesis Odd semester year 2007

Overview. PPL2PC19 - SQA Unit Code HK Prepare, cook and finish basic pasta dishes

Wideband HF Channel Availability Measurement Techniques and Results W.N. Furman, J.W. Nieto, W.M. Batts

Virginia Western Community College HRI 225 Menu Planning & Dining Room Service

Biocides IT training Helsinki - 27 September 2017 IUCLID 6

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

ACEF, June 2016

110 Review Safety Data Sheets (SDS), explain their requirements in handling hazardous materials, and describe personal protective equipment.

Culinary Arts Level 2 Cook

Table 1.1 Number of ConAgra products by country in Euromonitor International categories

FCS Lesson Plans: TEACHER GUIDE Pork Chops

Candidate Agreement. The American Wine School (AWS) WSET Level 4 Diploma in Wines & Spirits Program PURPOSE

5 Populations Estimating Animal Populations by Using the Mark-Recapture Method

Food Act 1984 (Vic) Application to register food vending machines

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. on the traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts

Memorandum of understanding

Overview. PPL2PC29 - SQA Unit Code HK8T 04. Prepare, cook and finish dim sum

Click to edit Master title style Delivering World-Class Customer Service Through Lean Thinking

Overview. PPL2PC16 - SQA Unit Code HK Prepare, cook and finish basic hot sauces

Square Divisor Cordial, Cube Divisor Cordial and Vertex Odd Divisor Cordial Labeling of Graphs

Saved analysis metric definition sheet

Produce basic hot and cold desserts

UNIT TITLE: PROVIDE GUERIDON SERVICE NOMINAL HOURS: 25

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture

Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014

Directions for Menu Worksheet ***Updated 9/2/2014 for SY *** General Information:

Communications Protocol for the Wine Industry

Crisis Communications Protocol for the Wine Industry

Transcription:

PharmaSUG 2016 - Paper DS14 TRTP and TRTA in BDS Application per CDISC ADaM Standards Maggie Ci Jiang, Teva Pharmaceuticals, West Chester, PA ABSTRACT CDSIC ADaM Implementation Guide v1.1 (IG) [1]. has defined the standards on how to use the TRTP and TRTA terminology when developing ADaM DBS datasets, and provided users some examples to illustrate how to utilize the standards. However, the definitions and examples from ADaM IG are limited to the applications that data is expected to be in good standing. There will be some sort of challenges for crossover studies when it comes to the situation that repeated visit record, unscheduled visit record or the record out of treatment visit window occur. This paper will present a review of experiences implementing TRTP and TRTA in ADaM BDS datasets, and discuss the comprehensive utilization of TRTP and TRTA terminology step by step with some practical examples. INTRODUCTION Per CDISC ADaM IG, TRTP is a record-level identifier that represents the planned treatment attributed to a record for analysis purposes. TRTP indicates how treatment varies by record within a subject and enables analysis of crossover and other designs. TRTxxP (copied from ADSL) may also be needed for some analysis purposes, and may be useful for traceability and to provide context. [2] However, in real world practice, the pre-defined copied from ADSL is not always working ideally to get what we want to achieve. In terms of the data with the duplicates, unscheduled or out of visit window records, the way to handle them could be depending on how we understand the BDS data structure, and how we understand the analysis requirement. This paper focuses on implementation side of the comprehensive utilization of TRTP step by step. It assumes basic knowledge of CDISC ADaM data structure, SAS programming, ADaM Implementation Guide v1.1 (IG) and FDA Study Data Technical Conformance Guide v2.1. Below are two cases of data which will be used throughout the discussion in this paper. One of which illustrates a clinical trial with a single treatment, the other is a cross-over study with three treatments. A group of examples will be presented in details to support such discussions. Table 1: ADSL in a single treatment study SUBJID TRT01P TRT01PN TR01SDT TR01EDT 201 A 1 01Jul15 01Sep15 202 B 2 01Jul15 01Sep15 203 B 2 01Jul15 01Sep15 204 A 1 01Jul15 01Sep15 Table 1 Treatment data values in ADSL Table 1.1: ADPC in a single treatment study SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA SCREEN 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours Table 1.1 Source data SDTM.PC of a single treatment study 1

Table 2: ADSL in a cross-over study SUBJID TRT01P TRT01PN TRT02P TRT02PN TRT03P TRT03PN TR01SDT TR01EDT TR02SDT TR02EDT TR03SDT TR03EDT 201 A 1 C 3 B 2 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 202 B 2 A 1 C 3 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 203 B 2 C 3 A 1 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 204 C 3 A 1 B 2 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 Table 2 Cross-over study treatment data values in ADSL Table 2.1: Case 1 Study: Perfect source data with SDTM.PC in a cross-over study SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:10 107 107 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:20 1540 1540 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:10 111 111 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:20 806 806 ng/l 0.5 Hours Table 2.1 Source data SDTM.PC with no discrepancy Table 2.2: Case 2 Study: Duplicates occurred in source SDTM.PC in a cross-over study SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8851 8851 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:10 107 107 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:20 1540 1540 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:10 111 111 ng/l 0.33 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:20 806 806 ng/l 0.5 Hours Table 2.2 Source data SDTM.PC with duplicate values for one visit 2

Table 2.3: Case 3 Study: Out-of-Visit-Window occurred in source SDTM.AE in a cross-over study USUBJID AEBODSYS AEDECOD AESTDTC AEENDTC 201 201 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Acne 2014-08-01T13:52 2015-08-01T12:00 Acne 2014-08-13T13:50 2015-08-18T11:00 201 Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea 2014-09-06T19:15 2015-09-08T05:46 201 Gastrointestinal disorders Vomiting 2014-09-07T10:35 2015-09-07T10:36 Table 2.3 Source data SDTM.AE with event dates out-of-visit-window Table 2.4: Case 4 Study: Unscheduled visit occurred in source SDTM.VS in a cross-over study USUBJID VSTESTCD VSSTRESC VSSTRESN VSSTRESU VISIT VSDTC VSTPTNUM VSTPT 201 PULSE 64 64 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:08-0.5-0.5 HOUR PRE DOSE 201 PULSE 50 50 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T07:58 2 2 HOURS POST DOSE 201 PULSE 56 56 BEATS/MIN UNSCHEDULED VISIT 2014-08-10T08:01 - - 201 PULSE 55 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T09:58 4 4 HOURS POST DOSE 201 PULSE 61 61 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:08-0.5-0.5 HOUR PRE DOSE 201 PULSE 59 59 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T07:58 2 2 HOURS POST DOSE 201 PULSE 60 60 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T09:58 4 4 HOURS POST DOSE 201 PULSE 71 71 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:08-0.5-0.5 HOUR PRE DOSE 201 PULSE 55 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T07:58 2 2 HOURS POST DOSE 201 PULSE 55 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T09:58 4 4 HOURS POST DOSE Table 2.4 Source data SDTM.VS with unscheduled event dates. TRTP and TRTA IN SINGLE TREATMENT STUDY In CDISC standards per ADaM IG 1.1, At least one treatment variable is required in a BDS dataset. This requirement is satisfied by any of the subject-level or record-level treatment variables (e.g. TRTxxP or TRTP). One is allowed to use any treatment variable in analysis of BDS. Any subject-level treatment variable may be copied into the BDS dataset from ADSL. [3]. When a clinical trial is defined as a single treatment study, it s relatively easier to practice the ADaM standards by directly following the ADaM IG. Let s look at the Table 1 and Table 1.1 case. Table 1: ADSL in a single treatment study SUBJID TRT01P TRT01PN TR01SDT TR01EDT 201 A 1 1--Jul-15 1--Sep-15 202 B 2 1--Jul-15 1--Sep-15 203 B 2 1--Jun-15 1--Aug-15 204 A 1 1--Jun-15 1--Aug-15 Table 1 Treatment data values in ADSL 3

For the single treatment study, we can get TRTP for ADPC by merging the ADSL and PC though Subject ID, and create the TRTP value in ADPC by copying the TRT01P from ADSL. Table 1.1: ADaM.ADPC in a single treatment study with TRTP added SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT TRTP 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA SCREEN 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) B 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours B 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours B 203 BUPRENOR PLASMA VISIT 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours B Table 1.1 ADaM.ADPC of a single treatment study This COPY method is applicable to all single treatment studies, we don t need to do any pre-work of data manipulation when add TRTP to ADaM BDS datasets. The illustrations above can be applied to the practice of TRTA variable in BDS dataset. TRTP and TRTA IN CROSS-OVER TREATMENT STUDY The beauty part of TRTP is that TRTP as a record-level identifier can represent the planned treatment attributed to a record for analysis purposes, and most importantly can indicate how treatment varies by record within a subject and enables the analysis of a crossover study design. When a study is designed as a cross-over multi-period treatment, how we should best utilize the ADaM IG regarding TRTP standards? Though there is no requirement that TRTP will correspond to the TRTxxP as defined by the record s value of APERIOD, if populated, TRTP must match at least one value of the character planned treatment variables in ADSL (e.g., TRTxxP, TRTSEQP, TRxxPGy). As noted by IG, at least one treatment variable is required even in non-randomized trials. This requirement is satisfied by any subject-level or record-level treatment variables (e.g., TRTxxP, TRTP, TRTA). Even if not used for analysis, any ADSL treatment variable may be included in the BDS dataset. The best practice of TRTP per ADaM IG is that users should assign the correct value to TRTP for all the analyzed records. To achieve this, some other comprehensive techniques need be taken into consideration. For example, variables in ADaM BDS datasets such ANLxxFL, AVISIT, APERIOD etc. may also contribute to the decision on how to define the TRTP value. Table 2 is an illustration of ADSL data of a cross-over study. By examining the data, it is a study with three treatment period. Each subject has three treatments along with three treatment start and stop dates. Table 2: ADSL in a cross-over three-treatment study SUBJID TRT01P TRT01PN TRT02P TRT02PN TRT03P TRT03PN TR01SDT TR01EDT TR02SDT TR02EDT TR03SDT TR03EDT 201 A 1 C 3 B 2 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 202 B 2 A 1 C 3 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 203 B 2 C 3 A 1 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 204 C 3 A 1 B 2 10Aug14 10Aug14 24Aug14 24Aug14 07Sep14 07Sep14 Table 2 Cross-over study treatment values in ADSL Below Table 2.1 is the first case, source SDTM.PC data shows that Subject 201 has the three-period data available and no discrepancy with the data collection. Such case allows us to identify the subject for his each record in SDTM.PC clearly in the ADSL data. 4

Table 2.1: Case 1 Study: ADPC in a cross-over study SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT TRTP 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) A 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours A 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours A 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours A 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours C 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:10 107 107 ng/l 0.33 Hours C 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:20 1540 1540 ng/l 0.5 Hours C 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours B 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:10 111 111 ng/l 0.33 Hours B 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:20 806 806 ng/l 0.5 Hours B Table 2.1 ADPC with the source PC data having no discrepancy However, when the BDS data is not in perfect collection format, some special attention then needs be given to it. Table 2.2 is a case that duplicate records are identified in the source SDTM.PC. In order to determine the value of TRTP correctly, ANL01FL has been taken into consideration. TRTP has been assigned the value A for the record with ANL01Fl= Y which tells that this record will be required for analysis. The other duplicate record has been left empty with TRTP. Table 2.2: Case 2 Study: ADPC in a cross-over study SUBJID PCTESTCD PCSPEC VISIT PCDTC PCSTRESC PCSTRESN PCSTRESU PCTPT TRTP ANL01FL 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0 (Pre-dose) A Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:10 54.3 54.3 ng/l 0.167 Hours A Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:20 1610 1610 ng/l 0.33 Hours A Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8840 8840 ng/l 0.5 Hours 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T06:30 8851 8851 ng/l 0.5 Hours A Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours C Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:10 107 107 ng/l 0.33 Hours C Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T06:20 1540 1540 ng/l 0.5 Hours C Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:10 <20.0. ng/l 0.167 Hours B Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:10 111 111 ng/l 0.33 Hours B Y 201 BUPRENOR PLASMA PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T06:20 806 806 ng/l 0.5 Hours B Y Table 2.2 ADPC with source PC having duplicate values for one visit 5

The more challenge comes when the BDS data is not clearly collected per time-period for a cross-over study. Table 2.3 illustrates an example of ADAE. The criteria with CRF Adverse Event collection often does not have the requirement to include study visit or study period, giving the fact that AEs should be collected anytime it takes place. For the analysis purpose, the frequency of AEs in each treatment period is demanded, and this can be achieved by adding TRTP. However, we can not this time simply copy the TRT01P from ADSL [Table 1.1] or merge by TRTxxP from ADSL [Table 2.1] or by VISIT period from SDTM.AE [Table 2.1 and Table 2.2]. Instead, some pre-calculation need be processed to obtain the visit period in SDTM.AE before assigning the TRTP values. Importantly the pre-process of visit period should follow the definition defined by Statistical Analysis Plan. In this Case 3 study, to derive the AVISIT per SAP rule IF Period 1 Start Date <= AE Start Date < Period 2 Start Date THEN AVISIT = Period 1 ELSE IF Period 2 Start Date <= AE Start Date < Period 3 Start Date THEN AVISIT = Period 2 ELSE IF AE Start Date >= Period 3 Start Date THEN AVISIT = Period 3 After the AVIST values have been appropriately retrieved, the TRTP can be obtained by merging into ADSL. Table 2.3: Case 3 Study: ADAE in a cross-over study USUBJID AEBODSYS AEDECOD AESTDTC AEENDTC AVISIT TRTP 201 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Acne 2014-08-01T13:52 2015-08-01T12:00 PERIOD 1 A 201 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Acne 2014-08-13T13:50 2015-08-18T11:00 PERIOD 1 A 201 Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea 2014-09-06T19:15 2015-09-08T05:46 PERIOD 2 C 201 Gastrointestinal disorders Vomiting 2014-09-07T10:35 2015-09-07T10:36 PERIOD 3 B Table 2.3 Source data SDTM.AE with event dates out-of-visit-window SAS code for the above AVISIT derivation in Table 2.3 can be done like this IF TR01SDT<= AESTDT< TR02SDT THEN AVISIT = Period 1 ELSE IF TR02SDT <= AESTDT < TR03SDT THEN AVISIT = Period 2 ELSE IF AESTDT >= TR03SDT THEN AVISIT = Period 3 You can also apply this rule to derive APERIOD to achieve the same goal as APERIOD can replace the AVISIT to be used to identify the BDS record IF TR01SDT<= AESTDT< TR02SDT THEN APERIOD = 1 ELSE IF TR02SDT <= AESTDT < TR03SDT THEN APERIOD = 2 ELSE IF AESTDT >= TR03SDT THEN APERIOD = 3 Note that the TR01SDT, TR02SDT and TR03SDT in ADSL have been used to identify the time period in AE data. The derivation rule is simply an example for your reference. You may also want to use TR01EDT, TR02EDT and TR03EDT for the derivation. The point is to follow the SAP to make the derivation correct for analysis purpose. Another challenge with BDS data is that unscheduled visits exist in the data almost everywhere. Let s bypass the data discrepancy checks at this point, assume we use the data as is. When it comes to deal with an unscheduled visit, first we need to identify how SAP defines the usage of the unscheduled. If an unscheduled visit has been defined not to be included in the analysis, simply leave TRTP empty. If an unscheduled visit has been defined to be included in the analysis, it s critical to figure out which AVISIT this unscheduled visit belongs to. In order to identify which TRTP this unscheduled record should go to, AVISIT or APERIOD value need be created first for the unscheduled record per SAP. For the Case 4 study, the unscheduled visit has been processed to AVISIT = PERIOD 1, AVISITNUM=2 and per SAP it should be included into analysis because it s the last available analysis value for PERIOD 1 TIMEPOINT 2. 6

Table 2.4a: Case 4 Study: ADVS in a cross-over study SUBJID VSTESTCD VSSTRESN VSSTRESU VISIT VSDTC VSTPTNUM AVISTNUM AVIST TRTP ANL01FL 201 PULSE 64 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:08-0.5-0.5 PERIOD 1 A Y 201 PULSE 50 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T07:58 2 2 PERIOD 1 201 PULSE 56 BEATS/MIN UNSCHEDULED VISIT 2014-08-10T08:01-2 PERIOD 1 A Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T09:58 4 4 PERIOD 1 A Y 201 PULSE 61 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:08-0.5-0.5 PERIOD 2 C Y 201 PULSE 59 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T07:58 2 2 PERIOD 2 C Y 201 PULSE 60 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T09:58 4 4 PERIOD 2 C Y 201 PULSE 71 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:08-0.5-0.5 PERIOD 3 B Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T07:58 2 2 PERIOD 3 B Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T09:58 4 4 PERIOD 3 B Y Table 2.4a Source data SDTM.VS with unscheduled event dates. You can also replace the AVISIT by APERIOD to achieve the same goal as APERIOD can also be used to identify the BDS record, see Table 2.4b. However, when it s merged to ADSL to get TRTP value, the ADSL.TRTxxPN should be used instead of TRTxxP. Table 2.4b: Case 4 Study: ADVS in a cross-over study SUBJID VSTESTCD VSSTRESN VSSTRESU VISIT VSDTC VSTPTNUM AVISTNUM APERIOD TRTP ANL01FL 201 PULSE 64 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T05:08-0.5-0.5 1 A Y 201 PULSE 50 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T07:58 2 2 1 201 PULSE 56 BEATS/MIN UNSCHEDULED VISIT 2014-08-10T08:01-2 1 A Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 1 2014-08-10T09:58 4 4 1 A Y 201 PULSE 61 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T05:08-0.5-0.5 2 C Y 201 PULSE 59 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T07:58 2 2 2 C Y 201 PULSE 60 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 2 2014-08-24T09:58 4 4 2 C Y 201 PULSE 71 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T05:08-0.5-0.5 3 B Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T07:58 2 2 3 B Y 201 PULSE 55 BEATS/MIN PERIOD 3 2014-09-07T09:58 4 4 3 B Y Table 2.4b Source data SDTM.VS with unscheduled event dates. All the illustrations above can be also applied to the practice of TRTA variable in BDS dataset. CONCLUSION This paper has presented a review of experiences implementing TRTP and TRTA in ADaM BDS datasets, discussed comprehensive utilization of CDISC ADaM supporting variables such as AVISIT, APERIOD and ANLxxFL etc. when developing TRTP, TRTA. The examples and discussions have demonstrated the step-by-step approach of how to appropriately derive the ADaM TRTP in BDS datasets per CDISC ADaM IG v1.1. Suggestions on how to handle the BDS data with discrepancies have also been covered. The purpose of this paper is focused on the discussion of the TRTP and TRTA terminology per CDISC ADaM IG. The details regarding the concept of what is CDISC ADaM are not covered in this paper. 7

REFERENCES [1] Analysis Data Model (ADaM) Implementation Guide Version 1.1 < CDISC Analysis Data Model Team >, 2016-02-12. [2] Analysis Data Model (ADaM) Implementation Guide Version 1.1 < CDISC Analysis Data Model Team >, page 32. [3] Analysis Data Model (ADaM) Implementation Guide Version 1.1 < CDISC Analysis Data Model Team >, page 32. CONTACT INFORMATION Your comments and questions are valued and encouraged. Contact the author at: Name: Maggie Ci Jiang Enterprise: Teva Pharmaceuticals Address: 905 Airport Rd City, State, ZIP: West Chester, PA 19380 Work Phone: 610-883-5790 E-mail: Maggie.jiang@tevapharm.com SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc. in the USA and other countries. indicates USA registration. Other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective companies. 8