Soft and Semi-soft Cheese made from Unpasteurized/Raw Milk in Canada Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada

Similar documents
Improving Enquiry Point and Notification Authority Operations

Industry update on the Food Premises Regulation 493/17, under the Health Protection and Promotion Act. Health Improvement Policy and Programs Branch

Developments in the legislation on food hygiene related with VTEC Kris De Smet European Commission GD SANCO, Unit G4 Food, alert system and training

Healthy Menu Choices Act, 2015 Application of the Act in Restaurants. What is a standard food item? Where must calories be displayed?

Streamlining Food Safety: Preventive Controls Brings Industry Closer to SQF Certification. One world. One standard.

Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation

The Bureau of Chemical Safety Food Directorate Health Canada

Medical Conditions Policy

NEW ZEALAND WINE FOOD BILL ORAL SUBMISSION OF NEW ZEALAND WINEGROWERS 23 SEPTEMBER Introduction

Allergy Awareness and Management Policy

U.S. WTO TBT and SPS Enquiry Points and Notification Authorities

COMMITTEE ON COMMODITY PROBLEMS

Thought Starter. European Conference on MRL-Setting for Biocides

MacKillop Catholic College Allergy Awareness and Management Policy

Amendment of the 85% rule in section 21(a) of the Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits) Registration Act 2006 (the GI Act).

M I D D L E S E X- LON DON HEALTH UNIT

Policy on Managing Health Risk Associated with the Consumption of Sprouted Seeds and Beans

Food Safety Action Plan

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Zoning Text Amendment DPA , Provide for the Production of Mead, Cider and Similar Beverages on A-1 Agriculture Properties (County Wide)

HELLENIC MULTI ANNUAL CONTROL PROGRAMME FOR PESTICIDE RESIDUES

PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE

Healthy Menu Choices Act, 2015 Application of the Act to Advertisements and Promotional Flyers

Fonterra: GLOBAL DAIRY UPDATE AUGUST 2013 ISSUE TWELVE

Re: LCBO Lightweight Glass Wine Standard Implementation Date

Overview of the International Framework of Organizations and Agreements

3. Permit hotels/resorts with a liquor primary to provide a free alcoholic drink to guests in the lobby/reception area at check-in

Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers. Regulatory Updates What s New?

Chair and members of the Board of Health. Jessica Morris, Manager, Environmental Health. Christopher Beveridge, Director, Health Protection

EDICT ± OF GOVERNMENT

REFIT Platform Opinion

Is a cottage food production operation a food service establishment? No. A cottage food production operation is not a food service establishment.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. on the traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts

Labelling for Food Allergen and Gluten Sources and Added Sulphites. Food Allergen Labelling / Domestic Canada Brand Sessions February 16-17, 2012

Lithgow Produce Markets

Fedima Position Paper on Labelling of Allergens

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Consultation on framework criteria: summary of responses

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

2014 Street Vending Recommendations for By-law & Guideline Updates. Engineering Department, Street Use Division February 19, 2014

Chapter Ten. Alcoholic Beverages. 1. Article 402 (Right of Entry and Exit) does not apply to this Chapter.

Review of Single-Serve Coffee Pods in the City of Toronto's Waste Diversion Programs

Louisiana Crawfish Action Plan

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain

MEMO CODE: SP , CACFP , SFSP Smoothies Offered in Child Nutrition Programs. State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States

Winery Retail Store Information Guide

Attachments: Memo from Lisa Applebee, ACHD Project Manager PowerPoint Slides for October 27, 2009 Work Session

Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement (CETA)

Tips. Some news d information..

Winery Retail Store Information Guide

TERMS OF REFERENCE APPOINTMENT OF A PANEL OF SERVICE PROVIDERS TO PROVIDE GAUTENG PROVINCIAL LEGISLATURE WITH C ATERING SERVICES

Proposed Maximum Residue Limit. Azoxystrobin

Bringing Faith and Learning to Life

Treated Articles and their regulation under the European Biocidal Products Regulation

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Waterways Suitability Assessment Process. LCDR Dan McQuate Office of Facility and Port Compliance, Facilities and Cargo Division (CG-FAC-2)

Gluten regulations frequently asked questions

KAWERAU DISTRICT COUNCIL General Bylaw Part 4: Food Safety (2009)

Customer Focused, Science Driven, Results Led

Wine in Moderation. ImplementatIon GuIde for WInerIes

Fairtrade Policy. Version 2.0

Liquor License Amendment - Change of Hours

INDUSTRY FACT SHEET. Vintage Wine and Application of Enhanced Allergen Regulations July 2012

Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004

Updating Training Package Products Cookery Qualifications. Consultation Briefing Paper

Precautionary Allergen Labelling. Lynne Regent Anaphylaxis Campaign

Grapevine Nursery Stock Regulatory Requirements and How They Relate to Red Blotch

Towards EU MRLs for biocides current status. Karin Mahieu

Shaping the Future: Production and Market Challenges

Relevant Biocidal Product Types in Food Contact Applications

Experience with CEPs, API manufacturer s perspective

Quantitative assessment of the risk of human salmonellosis associated with the consumption of tree nuts

A Practical Guide to Biocidal Products and Articles

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2293

The Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar. Ministry of Commerce. Union Minister s Office. Notification No. 18/2015.

The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011

UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH SUSTAINABLE FOOD PLAN

DRAFT REFERENCE MANUAL ON WINE AND VINE LEGISLATION IN GEORGIA

St. Therese School Allergy Awareness and Management Policy

Christian BUTZKE Professor of Enology Purdue Wine Grape Team

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD

Senate Bill (SB) 1067 Amendments/Revisions to Cal Code Effective January 1, 2017

FDA Report Conference for Food Protection Boise, Idaho April 16, 2016

2. What are the dates for the Afterschool Supper and Snack Program? The Supper and Snack Program will run from August 21, 2017 through June 6, 2018

SANCO/1069/2008 Rev. 1 (POOL/E4/2008/1069/1069R1-EN.doc)

Supports Item No. 2 CS&B Committee Agenda January 20, 2011

RAISE THE BAR Progress Report

WTO principles and beer Alberto Volpato Counsellor for Agriculture & Health EU Delegation to the Russian Federation

Change of classification and review of Food Production Baking unit standards. Competenz has completed the review of the unit standards listed above.

FOOD SAFETY & QUALITY DIVISION MINISTRY OF HEALTH MALAYSIA

Fair Trade Campus Application Form

Response to Reports from the Acadian and Francophone Communities. October 2016

Specify the requirements to be met by agricultural Europe Soya soya bean collectors and Europe Soya primary collectors.

GLUTEN LABELLING BEST PRACTICE:

Carole Bingley Customer Focused, Science Driven, Results Led

Welcome to the Play it Safe campaign pack

Nut Recalls and Food Borne Illness Outbreaks in North America

Division of Food Safety and Lodging June 14, 2010

Agriculture and Geographical Indications (GIs) in TTIP A guide to the EU's proposal. 21 March 2016

2. What are the dates for the Afterschool Meal Program? The Afterschool Meal Program will run from August 20, 2018 through June 4, 2019.

Transcription:

Your health and safety our priority. Votre santé et votre sécurité notre priorité. Soft and Semi-soft Cheese made from Unpasteurized/Raw Milk in Canada Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada Presented to the American Cheese Society Annual Conference August 6, 2011 - Montreal, QC

Summary Background Current Regulations Drivers for Change International Context Current Situation Moving Forward Stakeholder Involvment 2

Pasteurization In Canada, pasteurization is mandatory for all dairy products except cheese (F&D Regs B.08.002.2) Exceptions Cheese can be made from pasteurized milk, heat treated milk (thermized) or raw milk Cheese must be stored (60 days) at 2 C and above if heat treated or raw milk is used If the milk or cheese is used in products that would achieve pasteurization (F&D Regulations B08.002.2, B.08.030, B.08.044) 3

Background Current Regulations The Food and Drug Regulations (FDR) allow for the production of cheese made from unpasteurized milk if they are stored for 60 days before sale at a temperature of 2ºC or more. Most cheeses available were hard or firm cheese Pathogens of concern M. tuberculosis and B. abortus were killed during storage due to a decrease in ph and Aw In addition, the FDR set microbiological criteria for cheese. No person shall sell cheese made from an unpasteurized source if the cheese contains more than 500 Escherichia coli /gram of cheese or more than 1000 Staphylococus aureus /gram of cheese (B.08.048 (2) of the FDR) 4

Drivers for Change A recent FD risk assessment indicates that the 60-day storage requirement mandated by the FDR for soft and semi-soft cheese made from unpasteurized milk may allow for the growth of foodborne pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes. The FDR s current microbiological criteria for cheese made from unpasteurized milk are outdated and do not reflect the risk posed by pathogens such as L. monocytogenes or E.coli O157:H7. Since 2001, the CFIA has permitted imports from France of soft and semi-soft cheese made from unpasteurized milk to be sold in Canada without a 60-day storage period. This compliance policy is based on evidence that soft and semi-soft cheese made from raw/unpasteurized milk according to the French industry s application of EU requirements do not present a health and safety concern. The EU would like this policy to be expanded to include other countries. 5

International Context Internationally, there is a range of approaches to the management of unpasteurized soft and semi-soft cheese The EU permits the sale of unpasteurized cheese provided it is produced and labelled according to specified criteria. New Zealand introduced new legislation in 2010 that allows certain unpasteurized milk products (those that can be produced to an acceptable level of safety) to be produced, sold, exported and imported. Like NZ, Australia is proposing to categorize unpasteurized milk products according to the risk that they pose to consumers, with differing requirements depending on risk. In the U.S. if soft and semi-soft cheese is made from raw milk, it must be held for 60 days at 35 F (2 C) or greater. 6

Current Situation Quebec amended its regulations in 2008 to permit the sale and production of soft and semi-soft cheese made from unpasteurized milk without a 60-day storage period of 2 o C or more, provided the cheese is produced in compliance with specified standards. The FD has reviewed the Quebec requirements for manufacture of soft and semisoft cheese made from unpasteurized milk and has no health and safety concerns. The regulations emphasize the mitigation of potential microbiological contamination of cheese during production. In 2009, using a Temporary Marketing Authorization Letter (TMAL), HC authorized a QC producer to sell a soft cheese made from unpasteurized milk that has not been stored for 60 days throughout Canada (except Newfoundland). There is inequity in market access. Producers from France are not required to store unpasteurized cheese for 60 days, while domestic producers and other foreign producers must comply with the storage requirement. 7

Moving Forward Health Canada has identified several elements that could be incorporated into an updated policy for soft and semi-soft cheeses made from unpasteurized milk. Possible elements, some of which would require regulatory amendments, include: no longer require a 60 day storage period for all soft and semi-soft cheese made from unpasteurized milk, establish microbiological criteria for milk used in the production of unpasteurized soft and semi-soft cheese, update the existing microbiological criteria for cheese, require record keeping to support enforcement, develop an education campaign for consumers, mandatory labelling requirements. 8

CHEESES Categories of cheeses Canadian Dairy Information Centre www.dairyinfo.gc.ca % moisture based on fat free content SOFT CHEESE >67 and <80 SEMI-SOFT CHEESE >62 and <67 FIRM CHEESE >50 and <62 HARD CHESSE <50 9

Proposed Microbiological Criteria RAW MILK FOR USE IN CHEESE MAKING Analyses n c M M S. aureus 5 0 2000/ml 0 E. coli O157:H7 5 0 0/25 ml 0 L. monocytogenes 5 0 0/25 ml 0 Salmonella spp. 5 0 0/25 ml 0 Proposed wording for the Regulation or the Guideline No person shall sell cheese made from an unpasteurized source if the raw milk used in the production of raw milk and unpasteurized milk cheese contains more than 2,000 cfu/ml of S. aureus; and No person shall sell cheese made from an unpasteurized source if the raw milk used in the production of raw milk and unpasteurized milk cheese contains any of the following foodborne pathogens in the analytical unit analyzed: E.coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes or Salmonella spp. 10

Proposed Microbiological Criteria Raw and Unpasteurized Milk Cheese Analyses n c M M S. aureus / g 5 2 1000/g 10000 E.coli / g 5 2 100/g (500?) 1000 E. coli O157:H7 5 0 0/25 g 0 L. monocytogenes 5 0 0 0 Salmonella spp. 5 0 0 0 Proposed wording for the Regulation or the Guideline No person shall sell cheese made from an unpasteurized source if the raw milk cheese contains more than 100 cfu/g of generic E. coli or more than 1,000 cfu/ml of S. aureus; and No person shall sell cheese made from an unpasteurized source if the raw milk cheese contains any of the following foodborne pathogens in the analytical unit analyzed: E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes or Salmonella spp. 11

Stakeholder Involvement A 3-phase consultation strategy is underway: First phase: Initial discussions with provincial Health and/or Agriculture ministries on the general and scientific considerations Second phase: Consultation with a broader range of stakeholders Third phase: Posting of the policy intent document on the Health Canada website as a consultation document 12

First phase: Discussions with provincial and territorial partners Initial discussions with provincial Health and/or Agriculture ministries FPTFSC Meeting in November 2010 Presented Risk assessment and current status of policy development Confirmed provinces interested in follow-up in-depth discussions Followed-up with bilateral/semi-bilateral meetings with provincial partners - in January/ February 2011. Provincial partners were asked to respond to specific questions in writing by March 1, 2011. 13

First phase: Discussions with provincial and territorial partners (cont.) The objectives of the bilateral and multilateral meetings were: To discuss the findings of Health Canada s health risk assessment of the impact of the 60-day storage period on the public health risks associated with the consumption of soft and semi-soft cheese made from raw or unpasteurized milk. To discuss ways the science can be used to update HC s policy To gather and share information on the different provincial contexts and challenges To present and seek input on proposed elements of a revised policy 14

First phase: Questions asked to provincial partners Provincial partners were asked to answer the following questions in writing by March 1st 2011. What is the regulatory situation in your jurisdiction? Are there any manufacturers in your jurisdiction who make soft or semisoft cheese from raw and unpasteurized milk and store it for less than 60 days? Store it for 60 days or more? Are there any regional concerns with the policy objectives? Are there any suggestions to improve the scope of the proposed policy elements? Are there additional policy elements which should be considered? Who are the stakeholder groups in your jurisdiction that should be invited to participate in the broader consultation? 15

What we ve heard so far Common themes were raised during the discussion meetings. These included: Questions regarding the implementation enforcement of revisions to HC s policy and regulations on soft and semi-soft raw milk cheese, particularly with respect to non-federally registered plants; Concerns over the sale across Canada of soft cheese made of unpasteurized milk by a Quebec producer following the issuance of a TMAL by Health Canada; The need to carefully communicate information to the public distinguishing the safety of raw milk cheese as compared to raw milk; Questions about how these products should be labelled; and, Questions regarding the design of any public education campaign. 16

Next phases Phases # 2 and 3 Feedback received will help to refine potential options for next phase of consultation. HC is currently planning phase 2 of the consultation strategy: Anticipated to start in the Fall and last for three months Consultation will be done mostly online via a consultation document Gather information from a broad segment of stakeholders (e.g. industry, consumer groups) It is anticipated that the publication of the policy intent document on HC s web site for consultation will occur in Spring 2012 17

Canadian Stakeholders come forward! Should you want to be notified of the date the consultation will start, please let us know by contacting the Bureau of Microbial Hazards using the contact link below: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/contact/fn-an/hpfb-dgpsa/bmh-bdm-eng.php 18

Thank You! 19