Costa Rica: In Depth Coffee Report: COFFEE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE

Similar documents
HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

China Coffee Market Overview The Guidance For Selling Coffee In China Published November Pages PDF Format 420

Western Uganda s Arabica Opportunity. Kampala 20 th March, 2018

KOREA MARKET REPORT: FRUIT AND VEGETABLES

Making Direct Trade Viable For Small Coffee Producers Round Table Discussion:

FAIR TRADE = DIRECT TRADE Understanding supply chains and how they affect pricing.

For personal use only

July 19, 2018 I Industry Research Sugarcane FRP increased to Increase in sugarcane FRP for season Rs.275 per quintal for

Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry in and for Reduced Production

Highlights Sector Policy for Tea

Public policies and the financing of coffee production in Brazil

Specialty Coffee Market Research 2013

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Tanzania. Coffee Annual. Tanzania Coffee Annual Report

World of sugar PAGE 54

Regula'ng the Market: the Costa Rican Case. IGC NAEB Coffee Conference. Pepita Miquel- Florensa Toulouse School of Economics. February 9 th, 2015

UTZ Coffee Statistics Report 2017

Public good contributions among coffee farmers in Costa Rica: co-operativists and private dealers

Seeka Limited. Retail Investors March 2019

Post harvest management practice in disposal of cashewnut

UTZ Cocoa Statistics Report 2017

SPRING WHEAT FUTURES AND OPTIONS

On the margins: Third Party Certification among Papua New Guinea smallholder coffee producers

QUARTELY MAIZE MARKET ANALYSIS & OUTLOOK BULLETIN 1 OF 2015

Poland. Poland leads EU in processed strawberries

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

Profile No.: 43 NIC Code: FRUIT BAR

Mexico Milk Cow Numbers and Milk Production per Cow,

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

REGULATION 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Tea Statistics Report 2015

fredag 19. oktober 12

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND VINEYARDS IN NAPA COUNTY

THE AFRICAN COFFEE MARKET THE CASE OF MALAWI COFFEE INDUSTRY)

Rural Vermont s Raw Milk Report to the Legislature

QUESO CHONTALEÑO. Filippo Arfini Maria Cecilia Mancini Sabrina Cernicchiaro (UNIPR)

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WINE AND GRAPE INDUSTRY IN CANADA 2015

Fleurieu zone (other)

April 16th, By Jack Scoville

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

CONSUMER TRENDS Pulses In India

Fairtrade Finland Jatta Makkula 1

CHAPTER 7.3 FOCUS ON FAIRTRADE PRODUCTS COCOA

UKRAINE Climate conditions and soil in Ukraine are suitable for growing nut trees.

NZ Dairy Industry Report 2015

Preliminary unaudited financial results for the full year ended 30 June Amount for this reporting period

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

Vegetable Spotlight Broccoli

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

ETHIOPIA. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

How LWIN helped to transform operations at LCB Vinothèque

SMALLHOLDER TEA FARMING AND VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA

Ethiopian Coffee, Intellectual Property Rights And Geographical Indication Protection Perspectives

Ethiopian Millers Association Flour Milling, Pasta & Biscuits July, 2015

January 15th, By Jack Scoville

Maximizing Efficiency In The Production Of Coffee

Trade and Future Markets

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

Uruguay Cow Milk Market Production and Fluid Milk Consumption by Volume,

Chapter 3: Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

VINPRO PRODUCTION PLAN SURVEY 2015 (PART 2) Financial. Financial. indicatiors. indicators. of top performing wine grape producers

BESAN PLANT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PRODUCTS AND ITS APPLICATION: 3. DESIRED QUALIFICATION FOR PROMOTER: NIC Code:. Profile No.: 24

UTZ Tea Statistics Report 2017

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

Brazil Milk Cow Numbers and Milk Production per Cow,

THE DANISH WINE MARKET 2017/2018. Market Data Xxx, Date, Wines of Germany, Xxx

Estudio de las Cadenas de Valor de Maíz Blanco y Frijol en Centroamérica, IICA, RED SICTA, Cooperación Suiza en America Central, 2013.

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

M03/330/S(2) ECONOMICS STANDARD LEVEL PAPER 2. Wednesday 7 May 2003 (morning) 2 hours INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

EU sugar and its evolving role on the world stagehow are the value chain adapting? A buyers perspective. Marc Painsmaye

POLICIES & CONTROLS IN SUGAR SECTOR IN INDIA

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Preview. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Colombia Cow Milk Market Production and Fluid Milk Consumption by Volume,

1

Raw cashew price trends Short term: Increase Middle term: Slight increase

WP Council 264/ February 2016 Original: English. Guidelines for the preparation of country coffee profiles

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON a2s^6 5

Costa Rica Coffee Regions

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

Kidney Beans Value Chain and Export Capacity in the Kyrgyz Republic

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Your Professional Partner in Instant Coffee. A Company of Neumann Kaffee Gruppe

Since the cross price elasticity is positive, the two goods are substitutes.

Record Exports for Coffee Year 2016/17

1/17/manufacturing-jobs-used-to-pay-really-well-notanymore-e/

Agriculture and Food Authority

Nescafe China. From Seed to Cup. President of Nestle Beverage Division Vevey, Switzerland June 19, 2013 HASKAYNE C CONSULTING

Recent U.S. Trade Patterns (2000-9) PP542. World Trade 1929 versus U.S. Top Trading Partners (Nov 2009) Why Do Countries Trade?

Cocoa Prepared by Foresight October 3, 2018

in California Jim Lapsley (with thanks to Julian Alston and Dan Sumner)

Olympia Coffee. Oliver Stormshak, Co-Owner and Green Coffee Buyer

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

Not Just About the Coffee

2004 Grape Juice Concentrate Summary Report and Future Projections

Exportadora de Café California. Exportadora de Café California. Finance resilience in Coffee.

PRESENTATION TO CACP ON PRICING POLICY FOR SUGARCANE FOR SS INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION

Import Volume of coffee into Japan (metric tons) Total Green Beans equivalent. Soluble Coffee

Transcription:

Costa Rica: In Depth Coffee Report: COFFEE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE

COSTA RICA COFFEE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE 1 The Costa Rican Coffee Supply Chain Unlike most countries, in Costa Rica farmers don t process their coffee. Instead most of them deliver their cherry for processing to a coffee mill, which will process it all the way to green, export grade coffee. Processors in turn sell their coffee to exporters, who sort and consolidate parcels from different millers to provide the quantities and qualities required by the international buyer. At the same time roasters acquire coffee from processors, local intermediaries and recently, importers to supply the local consumption. Unique also to Costa Rica is how coffee is purchased. The price is not determined between farmer and processor at time of delivery. Instead the miller pays to the farmer an advance against delivery, this is not a credit, but instead becomes the minimum price. The final price is calculated at crop end and is the equivalent of total sales income, less milling expenses, coffee fund taxes and a 9% gross profit allowance to the miller. This places the bulk of the market risk on the millers hand since he doesn t hedge his coffee receipts as they come, instead it is with his physical sales, when the price is fixed that he begins to gradually cover his purchase. If the price goes up, the bulk of the benefit will go to the farmer, if the price goes down the miller faces the risk of his average sales price not providing a high enough level to cover the advance that he gave to the farmer, which can mean huge losses. All this calculation is performed by ICAFE (Costa Rica Coffee Institute), a non-government organization which by law supervises the coffee activity in Costa Rica. FARMGATE PRICE FOB Price to Exporter ICAFE Export Tax 1.5% Export Expenses Allowance Assigned by ICAFE Exporter Margin Rieles Internal Price (FOT Dry Mill) Milling Allowance Paid by Exporter to Miller Determined by ICAFE Coffee Fund $2.75 9% Gross Margin Net Price to Farmer Transport to Purchasing Point Covered by Farmer Farmgate Price 1 Source for CR Coffee Data ICAFE

Farmers According to ICAFE registers roughly 50,000 people delivered cherry to the coffee mills in the 2010/11 crop year. This number must be seen as an approximation to reality since the production of a single farm may be delivered on the name of several people, usually members of the same family; a practice that is common in small farmers. In the meantime in the upper end of the range, large producers who own more than one farm usually place each farm under a different legal name. What is a fact is that the current number represents a contraction of almost 1/3 during the past 10 years. Costa Rica Farmer Distribution Share of Total Farmers and Share of Total Production (2010-2011) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 92.3% 41% 35% 24% 6.1% 1.6% Below 100 Up to 300 Above 300 Farmers Production Only 1.6%, or 819 farmers produce more than 300 fanegas, roughly 200 69 bags of green coffee. This group however accounts for 35% of the total production. On the other hand 46,000 farmers, 92% will produce 41% of the total production with an average of just 18.5 fanegas, 12 bags of coffee. Costa Rica planted area was last estimated at 90,000 Hectares 5 years ago, which gave an approximate average productivity of 26.5 fanegas (18 69 kg bags) per hectare. Ten Years ago the average productivity was 31 fanegas per hectare. While there is no current estimate of planted area (a new survey is taking place and will be available in 2012), current productivity is estimated as an average of 22.8 fanegas per hectare.

Millers Since the XIX century Costa Rica opted for central milling. This in turn has allowed Costa Rica to offer a widely stable quality, since coffee is processed uniformly in a more professional way in large scale factories, the coffee mill, or beneficio. The number of coffee mills has fluctuated widely with time. 300 250 280 Number of Coffee Mills 200 172 150 100 113 95 127 50 0 1880 1963 1995 2005 2010 The growth in the quantity of operating mills is due to the growing phenomenon of the micro-mill. As was previously explained the traditional supply chain in Costa Rica is based upon a central processing plant, with receiving stations on the countryside to which farmers deliver their ripe cherries on a daily basis. Some large estates kept their mills through time, but the volume that was required mostly limited this to a few mills. A combination of several variables has allowed for the growth of this segment: a- Demand: There are sectors within the Specialty Industry that assign great value to the identity and uniqueness that some of this micro-mills can achieve b- Machinery: The import of the eco-mill machinery from Colombia decreased the required investment for a startup mill, since these modules are actually designed to operate with low volumes. Furthermore as the production crashed, a big surplus of used machinery at very low prices became available, reducing again the entry barrier. If we consider mills that process 5,000 fanegas (roughly 3300 bags) or less as micro-mills, 124 mills (out of the total of 172) are micro-mills, and process a total of almost 100,000 bags of coffee. The geographical distribution of these mills is shown on the following chart

1% 5% 9% 13% 17% 21% 25% 29% 34% 38% 42% 46% 50% 54% 58% 62% 66% 71% 75% 79% 83% 87% 91% 95% 99% % of Total Crop Micro-Mills Per Region Guanacaste, 12 Tarrazu, 38 PZ, 21 West Valley, 23 Turrialba- Orosi, 8 Central Valley, 22 The following chart shows the milling concentration. With such a large number of micro-mills handling such a small percentage of the crop the concentration of the crop in few hands should come as no surprise. 80% of milling companies handle just 10% of the crop, anthe top 10% of the milling companies will process 70% of the crop. 100% 90% 80% Costa Rica Milling Concentration 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

The following chart shows how the crop is shared for milling between multinationals, Coops and Independent millers. Costa Rica Milling Share Independent 36% Multinationals 28% Coops 36% Volcafe (183k bags), Ecom (113k), Segafredo (45k) and Neumann (20k) are the four active multinational companies. Volcafe and ECOM rank as #1 and 2 in processed volume as millers, and are the only multi mill operations left in the country.

2% 7% 12% 17% 22% 27% 32% 37% 42% 47% 52% 57% 62% 67% 72% 77% 82% 87% 92% 97% Cumulative % of Exports Exporters Unlike other origin countries, exporters in Costa Rica do not need to be processors. Vertical integration has happened both ways, with multinationals owning milling operations and millers, mainly coops, exporting directly their coffee. Still a significant percentage of the volume is traded by mills to exporters, who act very much like any trading company in the world. Coffee is sold locally already in green format. Exporters then take delivery of the coffee in dry mills, where they can sort and blend to match the demands of the foreign volume in both quality and quantity. AS with milling, the export industry shows a significant degree of consolidation, with 13% of the exporter firms accounting for 80% of exports and the top 3% handling 40% of the coffee. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010-11 Export Concentration Cumulative % of Exporter Firms

Exports per Type of Exporter Multinationals Coop Direct Coop Export Mill Direct Independent 5% 3% 14% 20% 58%