Relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle on different cucurbit vegetables

Similar documents
Life Science Journal 2014;11(7) Vegetables. Malaysia

LOWER HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Feeding Behavior and Food Preference of Red Pumpkin Beetle, Aulacophora Foveicollis

Effect on Quality of Cucumber (Pant Shankar Khira-1) Hybrid Seed Production under Protected Conditions

Cucurbit Crops. Cucumber

Eco-Friendly Management of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) in Allahabad, India

BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDES AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX OF PIGEONPEA [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] *PATEL, S. A. AND PATEL, R. K.

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center 1693 S 2700 W Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:

Watermelon production IDEA-NEW

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 26 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Olericulture Hort 320 Lesson 20, Cucurbits (abbreviated)

Biological Control of the Mexican Bean Beetle Epilachna varivestis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Using the Parasitic Wasp Pediobius foveolatus

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Insect Pests of Cucurbits in New Hampshire

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Development of Host-Plant Resistance as a Strategy to Reduce Damage from the Major Sunflower Insect Pests

Progress Report Submitted Feb 10, 2013 Second Quarterly Report

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Biology and phenology of scale insects in a cool temperate region of Australia

Report of Progress 961

Spotted wing drosophila in southeastern berry crops

Integrated Pest Management for Nova Scotia Grapes- Baseline Survey

Pests of Cucurbitaceous Vegetables and Their Management

Happy Halloween! Here is a list of top pumpkin pests: Squash Bug

ROSHNA GAZMER, NRIPENDRA LASKAR and GOBINDA ROY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHOD:

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

Perennial- Any plant that lives for more than 2 growing seasons. All trees and shrubs are perennials.

ALTERNATIVE CONTROL METHODS FOR GRAPE LEAFHOPPER: PART 2 FINAL REPORT 1/22/01

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTORATE OF RAPESEED-MUSTARD RESEARCH, BHARATPUR, INDIA

Carrot Rust Fly Study

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Coffee Season 2013/14 Finishes in Balance but Deficit Expected Next Year

Blackberry trials in Denmark

The Courtship of Honeybees, Buckwheat and Watermelon Blossoms

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Giant whitefly. Perennial Crops. Biological Control Update on. Citrus Leafminer Olive fruit fly. Giant Whitefly. Release

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

Pollination of Vegetable Crops

Melon. Cucurbitaceae Family

Corresponding author: Ornella K Sangma

Some Common Insect Enemies

Managing Insect Pests of Ripening Grapes

Cucumbers SEASONAL AVAILABILITY

Spider Mite Management in Walnuts. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UCCE Kern County Tri-County Walnut Day, 2008

Coffee market remains volatile but lacks direction

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Potential of Three Tropical Legumes for Rotation of Corn-Based Cropping System in Thailand

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Relative efficacy of some insecticides for the control of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora (Waterhouse) in Bangladesh

MANAGING INSECT PESTS IN BERRIES AND FRUITS. Small Farm School 8 September 2012 Bruce Nelson, CCC Horticulture Department

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

D Lemmer and FJ Kruger

Response of Camelina Varieties to NaCl Salinity

SILENCER E P A Reg. No

Forage Pests Identification and Control. By Mir M Seyedbagheri University of Idaho, Elmore Extension

Get serious about your approach to Botrytis management

Invasive Ambrosia Beetle Conference The Situation in California August 12 14, 2012

Holly Insects. (2a*ttnoC 9$ K. G. Swenson W. C. Adlerz. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College Corvallis

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

Vegetable Garden Insects

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Effect of Sowing Time on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn Cultivars

Managing Navel Orangeworm (NOW) in Walnuts. Kathy Kelley Anderson Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

TITLE: SEASONAL PHENOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF SPOTTED WING DROSOPHILA IN RASPBERRY CROPS IN NY DEC-2012 PROGRESS REPORT

Materials and Methods

EFFECT OF VERTICAL TRAILING ON VEGETATIVE, REPRODUCTIVE AND YIELD OF LUFFA AS INTERCROP IN COCONUT FIELD

Cultivation Pattern:

Coffee market ends 2015/16 in deficit for the second consecutive year

Study of Forage Productivity and Chemical Composition of Winter Vetch (Vicia villosa R.) under Optimization of the Factors of Sowing Time and Rate

6/18/18. Garden Insects of Eastern North America. Good Bugs, Bad Bugs: Friends and Foes in the Garden. Tips for Organic Gardening

Diagnosing Vegetable Problems

Entomopathogenic fungi on field collected cadavers DISCUSSION Quality of low and high altitude hibernators

SELECTION STUDIES ON FIG IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY

World of sugar PAGE 54

Managing potato leafhopper in wine grapes

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 15 September 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station

Figure 1: Quartely milk production and gross value

datcp PEST SURVEY rogra 2014 INSECT SURVEYS AND OUTLOOK FOR 2015 KRISTA HAMILTON, DATCP ENTOMOLOGIST

MARKET ANALYSIS REPORT NO 1 OF 2015: TABLE GRAPES

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 14 May 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Santa Barbara County Agricultural Commissioner

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

ECONOMICS OF COCONUT PRODUCTS AN ANALYTICAL STUDY. Coconut is an important tree crop with diverse end-uses, grown in many states of India.

Seasonal Incidence of Rice Yellow Stem Borer ( Scirpophaga Incertulas

TITLE 85: DEPARTMENT OF LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Current research status and strategic challenges on the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus in Uganda

Vegetable pest observations 8/2/07 by C. Welty

Transcription:

EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH Vol. III, Issue 4/ July 2015 ISSN 2286-4822 www.euacademic.org Impact Factor: 3.4546 (UIF) DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+) Relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle on SHAHMSHAD AHMED KHAN 1 University College of Agriculture University of Sargodha Pakistan Abstract: Cucurbits are mostly grown in tropical and sub tropical conditions but some of the vegetables are grown in temperate zone under artificial conditions like cucumber. A number of insect pests vines like striped and spotted cucumber beetle, spider mite, melon aphid, fruit fly, leaf minor and red pumpkin beetle. Red pumpkin beetle is the most important and destructive pest of cucurbit vegetables present throughout the world mainly in tropical and sub tropical zones. This study was conducted to check the relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle on Cucurbit vegetables. Results of this study showed red pumpkin beetle shows very minute attraction towards the Bitter gourd while it is highly attracted towards the musk melon. This study will provide helpful information to cucurbit breeders to develop resistance in musk melon in future. Key words: Relative infestation, Cucurbit varieties, Red pumpkin beetle. Introduction Cucurbitaceous vegetables i.e. cucumber (Cucumis sativus), bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), Water melon (Citrullus lanatus), Muskmelon (Cucumis melo), Round gourd and Bitter 1 Corresponding author: shamshadahmeduca@gmail.com 4424

gourd (Momordica Charentia) belongs to same family cucurbitaceae and it is very important and biggest group of vegetable. Cucurbits are mostly grown in tropical and sub tropical conditions but some of the vegetables are grown in temperate zone under artificial conditions like cucumber (Dhaliwal, 2008). The family cucurbitaceae have 118 genera and 825 spp, most of them derived from the old world (Rai M, (2008).). Most of the cucurbits are annual and grown through the seeds by direct sowing in the field but some cucurbits are perennial. Cucurbit vegetables are grown in warm weather and these vegetables can t grow under the cold conditions. Area under cultivation of cucumber, bottle gourd, melons and bitter gourd is 715, 449, 19711 and 681 hectares. Cucurbitaceous vegetables are tender annual wine vegetables and are grown only for their fruits. All these vegetables belong to family cucurbitaceae and have same cultural requirements, most of diseases and insect pests. These vegetables flourish under temperature of about 18 to 30 o C (68-85 F) (Saljoqi and Khan, 2007). All these vegetables are harvested at immature stage and used as raw or after cooking. A number of insect pests vines like striped and spotted cucumber beetle, spider mite, melon aphid, fruit fly, leaf minor and red pumpkin beetle. Red pumpkin beetle among these pests is the most destructive pest of the cucurbitaceous vegetables. This pest is distributed over Asia Australia Europe and Africa (Atwal and Dhaliwal, 1997). Red pumpkin beetle were active at 27 to 32oC but they become inactive at temperature above the 35oC (J, 1943. ). Large number of insect pests infesting cucurbit vegetables right after the germination to the maturity but few of them have serious concern i.e. hadda beetle, red pumpkin beetle and fruit flies (AK, 1992). Originally red pumpkin beetle is a pest of pumpkin, bottle gourd, and Musk melon, but it feed all cucurbitaceous vegetables (Raman, 1985.). Red pumpkin beetle is polyphagous insect distributed all over the India (Butani DK and Jatwani MG 1984). Red pumpkin beetle is 4425

distributed all over the world i.e. Greece, cyperus, Sri Lank, Nepal, and Burma, Aden, Iraq, south Europe (AS, 1983). It causes damage to cucurbits at both larval and adult stages. Damage caused by red pumpkin beetle may range 35 to 75 % (Saljoqi and Khan, 2007). Vines are damaged by feeding on cotyledon or leaves from seedling stage to maturity. Beetles start attack right after the germination and slower down the growth of plants due to serious attack. Both adult and larvae stage attack on the vegetables and larvae lives underground are destructive for the roots. Roots start rottening due to attack of saprophytic fungi. Beetle starts activity from March and remains in the field till October. Peak activity period of red pumpkin beetle is from April to June and its population decreases from September (Butani DK and Jatwani MG 1984) and (ML, 1978.). This study was carried out from 1 st week of April to 1 st week of May for one month. Attacks of red pumpkin beetle although, started in month of March and remained till end of April in high population and it decreased by degrees during first week of May. Materials and Methods These experiments were conducted to study relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle on. Six crops namely Cucumber, Bottle gourd, water melon, musk melon, round gourd, and bitter gourd with two verities of each crop were selected for these trails. These field trials were sown on 15 th march 2013 at Barani agricultural research institute Chakwal. There were twelve treatments and each treatment was replicated thrice in Randomized complete block design each block is 6x4m in dimension. With crops in main plots and varieties in sub plots repeated thrice. A plot size of 6m*4m was kept for experimental unit. The design used for the experiment was factorial RCBD with crops in main plots and varieties in 4426

sub plots repeated thrice. A plot size of 6m*3m was kept for experimental unit. Pest infestation statistics were initiated to record from the 1 st April for six weeks. Red pumpkin beetle were counted from 3 plants selected from each plot per replication. Vine was divided into 3 parts basel, middle, and the end part for beetle infestation data recording. Pesticides were sprayed when pest infestation reached economic injury level and this happened two times during these studies. Results Results are given in the table attack of red pumpkin beetle was started from 1 st week of study. Vegetables were sown from 11 th to 15 th March 2013. When the study was begin number of red pumpkin beetle was high. All the host varieties were infested by the red pumpkin beetle except Bitter gourd it was the least infested crop of cucurbits. But the infestation of red pumpkin beetle was not same on all the crops. During the whole study infestation of red pumpkin beetle was higher on cucumber. Red pumpkin beetle was high on the cucumber (Liza) during 1 st, and 5 th week of study. Cucumber (Sulaman) shows the higher infestation of red pumpkin beetle during 1 st and 2 nd week of study. Beetles were calculated higher during 1 st week on bottle gourd (Arya). Bottle gourd (BSS-687) supported higher red pumpkin beetle during 1 st, 4th, 5 th and 6 th week of study. Water melon (Asia black star) shows higher infestation during 5 th and 6 th week of study. Water melon (sugar body) hosted higher number of red pumpkin beetle during 1 st, 3 rd and 5 th week of study. Musk melon shows relatively lower infestation. Infestation of red pumpkin beetle was observed higher round gourd (Asian) during 6 th week of study. Round gourd (Jade ball F1) supported higher infestation during 5 th and 6 th week of study. Both 4427

varieties of bitter gourd (PALEE F1 and Nirali) show nearly equal to zero infestation of red pumpkin beetle. Population of red pumpkin beetles were calculated higher on Cucumber and water melon. Bottle gourd, musk melon and round gourd show the lower infestation of red pumpkin beetle. Infestation of red pumpkin beetles were calculated nearly equal to zero shown in the pooled mean of crops. Infestation of red pumpkin beetle with respect to weeks Mean pooled data of the weeks shows that the relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle was highest during the 9 th to 14th week of study. But population of red pumpkin beetle is lower during at the 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 17 th and 18 th week of study. Population of red pumpkin beetle was moderate during the 4 th, to 8 th week and during the 16 th week of data collection (table 1). Table 1: Mean values of attracted red pumpkin beetles on weekly basis Weeks 2 3 4 Mean Total ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 * * * 1 9.944 358.000 2 * * * 2 12.833 462.000 3 * * * 3 18.083 651.000 4 * * * 4 23.250 837.000 5 * * * 5 26.722 962.000 6 * * * 6 38.361 1381.000 7 * * * 7 49.111 1768.000 8 * * * 8 66.083 2379.000 9 * * * 9 73.389 2642.000 10 * * * 10 82.556 2972.000 11 * * * 11 84.889 3056.000 12 * * * 12 86.861 3127.000 13 * * * 13 91.750 3303.000 14 * * * 14 81.861 2947.000 15 * * * 15 41.778 1504.000 16 * * * 16 30.889 1112.000 17 * * * 17 21.333 768.000 4428

18 * * * 18 10.083 363.000 ------------------------------------------------------------- Infestation of red pumpkin beetle with respect to Crops Mean pooled data shows that Bitter gourd shows the resistance against red pumpkin beetle while the Musk melon is highly susceptible against the red pumpkin beetle. Tinda gourd, water melon and Bottle gourd show the intermediate susceptibility (table 2). Table 2: Mean values of attracted red pumpkin beetles toward cucurbit vegetables Vegetable Mean Total ----------------------------------------------------------------- Cucumber * * * 52.019 5618.000 Bottle gourd * * * 45.315 4894.000 Water melon * * * 58.120 6277.000 Musk melon * * * 64.130 6926.000 Bitter gourd * * * 0.019 2.000 Tinda gourd * * * 63.657 6875.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Infestation of red pumpkin beetle with respect to verities Constable variety of cucumber shows the more susceptibility against the red pumpkin beetle than the Beitalpha variety of cucumber. While in case of Bottle gourd varieties BSS- 687 F1 shows the lower effect of red pumpkin beetle attack then the Arya. Water melon were the 3 rd most attractive vegetables to red pumpkin beetle, Andaman shows less attraction towards of red pumpkin beetle then the sweet Delight variety. Musk melon shows the higher attack of red pumpkin beetle so on during study on both varieties honey ball and on sweet honey. While the variety which was highly susceptible to red pumpkin beetle during the whole study was Moon star and other variety Tinda 4429

321 was not so susceptible. Very lower attack of red pumpkin beetle was done on bitter gourd nearly equal to zero (graph). Discussion In this study 12 varieties of cucurbit vegetables are studied for the relative abundance of red pumpkin beetle. Varieties under study were Liza, Sulaman (cucumber), Arya, BSS- 687 (bottle gourd), Asia black star, sugar body (water melon), Asian, Jade ball F1 (round gourd), PALEE F1, Nirali (bitter gourd). Different studies are conducted to check the preference and non preference of red pumpkin beetle against different cucurbit vegetables. (Mehta, 1989) conducted experiment on ten and found that Bitter gourd was strongly resistance against the red pumpkin beetle but the Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) and Sponge gourd (Luffa scutannils) were less resistant. Water melon (Citrullus lanatus), Musk melon (Cucumis melo) and Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) were moderately susceptible to red pumpkin beetle. (Roy, 1990.) conducted study to investigate the relative susceptibility of different cucurbit vegetable to red pumpkin beetles. Studies shows that Bitter gourd were highly resistant to red pumpkin beetle while Sponge gourd and Bottle gourd were shows the moderately resistance. Vegetables showing high susceptibility were Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and Musk 4430

melon (Cucumis melo). Banana Squash (Cucurbita maxima), Bottle gourd and musk melon shows the relatively high susceptibility against red pumpkin beetle. While Water melon, Bitter gourd, Snake gourd and Sponge gourd and attains the second position in this study for the preference of red pumpkin beetle (Roy, 1991). In present study both varieties of Bitter gourd (Jaunpuri, Nirali) were highly resistant to red pumpkin beetle attack and shows very minute amount of attack. So this result shows the similarity the similarity to previous results for the Bitter gourd. In present case of study both varieties of Water melon shows the intermediate attraction (Andaman, Sweet Delight) towards the red pumpkin beetle hence these results are in line with the previous collected result. In this study conducted for the determination of relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle both varieties of Cucumber and Bottle gourd shows the relatively moderate susceptibility to red pumpkin beetle. So these results are similar to previous collected results. REFERENCES: AK GDaV 1992. Population fluctuations of the maggots of fruit flies, bactrocera cucurbitae (coquillett) and b. Tau (walker) infesting cucurbitaceous crops. Advances in Plant Sciences 5 (2), 518-523. AS MGaS 1983. Nomenclature status of genus aulacophora duponchel & chevrolat and aulacophora foveicollis (lucas). Entomon 8 (1):, 105-106. Atwal AS, Dhaliwal GS 1997. Agricultural pests of south asia and their management. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, New Delhi, India., pp, 487. 4431

Butani DK and Jatwani MG 1984. Insects in vegetables. Periodical Expert Book Agency, Delhi, p 84. Dhaliwal MS 2008. Handbook of vegetable crop. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, New Delhi, India. J P 1943.. The biology and control of aulacophora foveicollis lucas in greece. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 30(1), 72-78. Mehta PKaGSS 1989. Studies on host preference and rate of feeding by red pumpkin beetle (aulacophora foveicollis) on different cucurbits. Veg. Sci. 16 (1), 66-74. ML SCaP 1978. Population study of red pumpkin beetle, aulacophora foveicollis lucas a serious insect pest of cucurbits. Science and Culture 44 (7), 335. Rai M P, S. and Kumar, S. (2008). Cucurbit research in india: A retrospect cucurbitaceae 2008, in: Pitrat, m. (ed.), cucurbitaceae 2008. Proceedings of the ix eucarpia meeting on genetics and breeding of cucurbitaceae, inra, avignon, france. Raman KaSA 1985. Host selection entomology, 52(2): 274-278. And food utilization of red pumpkin beelte, 25. Mehta, p.k. And g.s. Sandhu, 1990. Monitoring of red raphidopalpa foveicollis (lucas) (chrysomeliade: Pumpkin beetle (aulacophora foveicollis) by coleoptera). Production Indian Academy of Science cucurbitacins as kairomones through poison baits. (Animal Science), 94(5), 547-556. Roy DCaYD 1990.. Host preference and feeding rate of red pumpkin beetle (aulacophora foveicollis) in tripura.. Pande. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 62 (2):, 408-410. Roy DCaYDP 1991. Biological studies on the red pumpkin beetle, raphidopalpa foveicollis (lucas)(coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in tripura. J. Advancd Zool. 12 (1):, 1-6. Saljoqi AUR, Khan S 2007. Relative abundance of the red pumpkin beetle, aulacophora foveicophora lucas, on 4432

different cucurbitaceous vegetables. Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 23, No. 1. 4433