Tomato Variety Performance in High Tunnels

Similar documents
Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

Sweet Corn Variety Performance

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2006

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

2009 Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group Heirloom Tomato Project Summary Indiana

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Mini Sweet Pepper and Heirloom Pepper Performance in High Tunnels, 2015

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Growing strawberries in tunnels

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Saffron: A Good Fit for New England. Margaret Skinner, Bruce L. Parker & Arash Ghalehgolabbehbahani

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

High Tunnel Crops. Shubin K. Saha D.P.M., Ph.D., Extension Vegetable Specialist Department of Horticulture University of Kentucky

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Recalibration for Sunflower

~culture Series No. 5~

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

2002 NEW JERSEY MEDIUM ROUND HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1. Rutgers Cooperative Extension INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Title: Development of New Strawberry Varieties Adapted to the NC Plasticulture System. Name, Mailing and Address of Principal Investigator(s):

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Blackberry trials in Denmark

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Kevin Long Craig County OSU Extension Educator AG/4-H Youth Development

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO THE FINNISH GROWING CONDITIONS

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

Grower Summary TF 170. Plums: To determine the performance of 6 new plum varieties. Annual 2012

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Cocoa Prepared by Foresight December 5, 2017

Evaluation of Summer Cabbage for Tolerance to Onion Thrips. Christy Hoepting & Katie Klotzbach Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program

Performance of New Vegetable Pepper and Tomato Cultivars Grown in Northwest Ohio 2009

1

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

Updates from the RBC Raspberry Breeding Programme. SSCR Soft Fruit winter meeting, 16 th February 2017

Insect Control Research for Pecan

Lettuce Cultivar Observation Trial 2013

Crop Reports by Hal Kneen and Brad Bergefurd

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

EVALUATION OF NEW HASS -LIKE AVOCADO CULTIVARS IN SOUTH AFRICA

Succession Planting is planting two or more different vegetables in the same garden space within one growing season.

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

GALA SPLITTING WASHINGTON TREE FRUIT POSTHARVEST CONFERENCE. March 13 th & 14 th, 2001, Wenatchee, WA PROCEEDINGS, Gala Splitting page 1 of 6

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Sustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Physiology, Orchard Establishment, Cultivars, Training/Pruning. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Michigan State University 2015 Seedless Pickling Cucumber Variety Trial

EFFECTS OF KAOLIN CLAY PARTICLE FILM ON LEAF TEMPERATURE, NUT TEMPERATURE AND SUNBURN SUSCEPTIBILITY IN WALNUT

Seasonal trends in hectares planted, sales volumes on markets and market prices. Pieter van Zyl, Potatoes South Africa

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Jonathan R. Schultheis Brad Thompson Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Hort. Series No. 187

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Determining the Optimum Time to Pick Gwen

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Growing cucumbers in high tunnels

Transcription:

Tomato Variety Performance in High Tunnels Liz Maynard and Erin A. Bluhm Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture February 15, 2018 Indiana Horticulture Congress Indianapolis, Indiana

Where: Pinney Purdue Agriculture Center, Wanatah, IN When: March 28(seed), April 28 (transplant) August 30 2 tunnels HT1 Organic HT2 Conventional 7 varieties 144 plants 7 harvests July 18 Aug 28

Tunnels: 6 beds per tunnel, 3 x 42 3 beds for trial, 6 plots per bed 4 plants per plot, 21 spacing Plants: seeded March 28 transplanted April 28

HT-1, Organic preplant: 90 lbs./a N from 13-0-0 (Nature Safe pelleted nitrogen blending base) (1286 lbs./a) HT-2, Conventional preplant: 30 lbs./a N from 46-0-0 (Shaw s Turf Food urea) HT-2, Conventional, additional nitrogen: 6 lbs./a/wk N from UAN (2.01 gal/a/wk) fertigation for six weeks 8 lbs./a/wk N from UAN (2.68 gal/a/wk) fertigation for five weeks April 2017 soil tests

Variety Trial Cultivars Big Beef (JSS) Red Deuce (HM) XTM 1134 (SAK) BHN 589 (JSS) Summerpick (SYN) Cherokee Purple (JSS) HT 1 only Grand Marshall (SAK) HT 2 only

Grading and Weighing USDA No. 1 Max Large (> 3 ½ ) Extra Large (2 ¾ 3 ½ ) Large (2 ½ 2 ¾ ) Medium and Small (2 1/8 2 ½ ) USDA No. 2 All sizes Farmer s Market (USDA No. 3) All sizes Record number and weight of fruit in each category Record number, weight, and reason for culls

Wind damage to HT2 May 18 Maximum wind gust all over 25 mph from 10:00 to 22:00 Sustained winds averaged more than 15 mph, mostly over 17 mph

Possible herbicide drift Adjacent field sprayed May 19, bleaching first observed on May 26. Tunnels closed for any spraying in nearby fields after initial incident.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (white mold, timber rot) confirmed May 26 May 16 June 11 July 19

Organic BHN 589 Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 26.0 13.1 0.50 Max Large % No. % Wt. 19.9 25.8 Yield similar to others, fruit size in the middle. Among the earlier varieties.

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Organic BHN 589

Conventional BHN 589 Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 18.8 10.5 0.55 Max Large % No. % Wt. 14.6 20.71

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional BHN 589

Organic Big Beef Red Fruit Per Plant No. USDA No. 1 Wt. Lb./ Fruit 24.7 12.4 0.50 Max Large % No. % Wt. 13.5 19.8 Lower No. 1 yield but among highest for total red and green yield. One of the earlier varieties. In HT 1 tended to have more cracking than others except Cherokee Purple

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 22

Organic Big Beef

Conventional Big Beef Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 17.7 10.0 0.56 Max Large % No. % Wt. 12.1 17.5

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional Big Beef

Conventional Grand Marshall Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 22.1 11.5 0.52 Max Large % No. % Wt. 10.2 16.2 In the middle for No. 1 yield, fruit size, and total yield.

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional Grand Marshall

Organic Red Deuce Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 20.2 12.8 0.64 Max Large % No. % Wt. 27.5 38.9 Largest No. 1 fruit, No. 1 yield higher or similar to others, total yield in the middle. One of the earlier ones.

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Organic Red Deuce

Conventional Red Deuce Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 21.8 13.9 0.63 Max Large % No. % Wt. 26.0 35.6

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional Red Deuce

Organic Summerpick Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 28.5 12.5 0.45 Max Large % No. % Wt. 10.6 17.9 Smaller fruit, later.

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Organic Summerpick

Conventional Summerpick Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 22.8 11.5 0.50 Max Large % No. % Wt. 9.6 14.5

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional Summerpick

Second largest No. 1 fruit, No. 1 yield similar to others, total yield among the lowest. One of the later hybrids. Organic XTM 1134 Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 22.3 12.4 0.56 Max Large % No. % Wt. 19.2 29.4

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Organic XTM 1134

Conventional XTM 1134 Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 20.2 11.5 0.57 Max Large % No. % Wt. 13.7 20.6

July 25 Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 25

Conventional XTM 1134

Organic Cherokee Purple Red Fruit Per Plant USDA No. 1 No. Wt. Lb./ Fruit 12.5 6.0 0.50 Max Large % No. % Wt. 5.0 6.89 Total yield in middle of range. High percentage of culls.

Aug 1 Aug 8 Aug 18 Aug 25

Organic Cherokee Purple

August 1 Harvest

High Tunnel 1 High Tunnel 2 Red Fruit per Plant (marketable and cull) BHN 589 Big Beef Cherokee Purple Red Deuce Summerpick XTM 1134 Red Fruit per Plant (marketable and cull) BHN 589 Big Beef Grand Marshall Red Deuce Summerpick XTM 1134 PPAC 2017

Thank you. Questions? Acknowledgments J. Leuck and Pinney-Purdue Ag Center staff managed field operations. S. Musgrave assisted with crop production and harvest. Seed companies HM Clause, Sakata and Syngenta provided financial support and/or seed. This project was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service through grant (SCBG-15-002). The contents of this report are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA. Collaborators: James Farmer, Project PI, and Analena Bruce, Project Post Doc, Indiana University Bloomington