The Michigan Blueberry Industry Mark Longstroth and Eric Hanson Michigan State University

Similar documents
2/13/2012. Blueberries: Spartan. Earliblue. Blueberries: Wonderful fruit & Great Ornamentals. Master Gardener Handbook

SITUATION AND OUTLOOK FOR COMMODITIES GREAT LAKES REGION, 2017 CROP YEAR GENERAL:

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

6600 SW Philomath Blvd., Corvallis, OR ~ (541)

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

Blueberries: Wonderful fruit & Great Ornamentals

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Watermelon production IDEA-NEW

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center P.O. Box 870 Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:


What went wrong. Pepper Sunscald. In this issue, find out what might have gone wrong with your vegetable harvest this season.

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Small Fruit. Less successful. Successful in Montana. Refers not just to the size of the fruit, but rather the size of the plant.

Integrated Crop Management for Vineyards

Machine harvesting blueberries for fresh markets: Experiences and lessons learned in NC

Blueberry Diseases in Michigan

Apricot. Pruning. Fruit Fly

Joseph A. Fiola, Ph.D. Specialist in Viticulture and Small Fruit Western MD Research & Education Center Keedysville Road Keedysville, MD

Overview. Cold Climate Grape Growing: Starting and Sustaining a Vineyard

The Implications of Climate Change for the Ontario Wine Industry

Physiology, Orchard Establishment, Cultivars, Training/Pruning. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Ai Arizona Citrus Trends. Scott Halver Appraiser Ganado Group

FRUIT TREES/SHRUBS 2014

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Results of Testing Highbush Blueberry Cultivars in The Netherlands

Aftermath of the 2007 Easter Freeze: Muscadine Damage Report. Connie Fisk, Muscadine Extension Associate Department of Horticultural Science, NCSU

New York s revitalized grapevine certification program and New York nurseries. Marc Fuchs Associate Professor Cornell University

California Certified Strawberry Nurseries: pathogens of regulatory significance for the Santa Maria area

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Hybrid Seeds Production

BEANS FOR THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

Cold Climate Wine Grape Cultivars: A New Crop in the Northeast and Upper Midwest Regions of the USA

Problems affecting seeds and seedlings

Diagnosing Vegetable Problems

Integrated Pest Management for Nova Scotia Grapes- Baseline Survey

Hop Farming in Ontario

MANAGING INSECT PESTS IN BERRIES AND FRUITS. Small Farm School 8 September 2012 Bruce Nelson, CCC Horticulture Department

LAKE ONTARIO BEAMSVILLE BENCH VINEMOUNT RIDGE STATISTICS

Refers not just to the size of the fruit, but rather the size of the plant. Most small fruits are selffruitful

Quality of western Canadian peas 2009

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

U-Pick and Small Market Blueberry Cultivars for Mississippi S.J. Stringer and D.A. Marshall-Shaw USDA-ARS TCSHL, Poplarville, MS

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Water Street Solutions Aerial Crop Tour /30/15

Recognizing and Managing Blueberry Diseases

AVOCADO FARMING. Introduction

WE VE GOT YOU COVERED BETTER DISEASE CONTROL STARTS WITH A BETTER COPPER FORMULATION NOW REGISTERED FOR THE CONTROL OF PSA IN KIWIFRUIT

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Avocado Farming. Common varieties grown in Kenya

Ison s Nursery & Vineyard Planting Instructions Pakistan Mulberry Trees

Elderberry Ripeness and Determination of When to Harvest. Patrick Byers, Regional Horticulture Specialist,

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Corn Growth and Development

Apples. References: New York Apple Association, Rutgers University, University of Georgia, Washington Apple Commission.

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 14 May 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

Harvest & Post Harvest Handing of Blueberries for Fresh & IQF Markets. Charles F. Forney Kentville Research and Development Centre

1

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Disease management update for muscadines in the Southeast

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2009

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Lesson 2 The Vineyard. From Soil to Harvest

Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center 1693 S 2700 W Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:

Evaluation of Compost Teas for Disease Management of Wild Blueberries in Nova Scotia

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Santa Barbara County Agricultural Commissioner

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

OLEA EUROPAEA (OLIVE) OLIVE

Malting barley prices Basis FOB Swedish /Danish Port Basis Oct 14/15/16/17/18/19 EUR/mt 230

Blueberry Conference 2018 Varieties development Horst 07 March Andrea Pergher, Fall Creek. Fall Creek

Updates to the Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide. New Publication Title. Grape Bud Break to Prebloom. Grape Pre-bloom through Bloom

ational Sunflower Survey: An Overview

Green Onions SEASONAL AVAILABILITY

Effect of Phosphorus and Plant Density on Floral Yield and Corm Production of Crocus sativus

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Napa County Agricultural Commissioner s Office 2016 Agricultural Crop Report

Washington State Wine 101

Arthropod Management in California Blueberries. David Haviland and Stephanie Rill UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co. Blueberry Field Day 20 May 2009

Prepared by: Shawn Banks and Amie Newsome Johnston County Extension Agents Agriculture - Horticulture

SAFFRON. It s beautiful, tasty and expensive

Unit F: Harvesting Fruits and Nuts. Lesson 1: Harvest Tree Fruits, Small Fruits, And Nuts

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

The important points to note are: Firmometer value. Days after treatment

Labor Requirements and Costs for Harvesting Tomatoes. Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu, and Steven Sargent University of Florida

Choosing Blueberry Cultivars Experiences in NC and thoughts on cultivars for Missouri

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 May 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Department of Horticulture The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research &Development Center Wooster, OH 44691

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Chris Smart. Plant Pathology and Plant- Microbe Biology Cornell University Geneva, NY

Canadian Dry Bean Growing Regions

Transcription:

The Michigan Blueberry Industry Mark Longstroth and Eric Hanson Michigan State University Blueberries are native to Michigan. Lowbush blueberries are common in the Upper Peninsula and the northern forests of the Lower Peninsula. Highbush blueberries are more common in the lower half of the Lower Peninsula. Blueberries were gathered by native populations long before European settlers arrived. The development of the modern blueberry industry began in the early 1900s. In Michigan, Dr. Stanley Johnston led the development of the Michigan industry. He established test plantings in the 1920 s at Michigan State University s South Haven Agricultural Research Farm. Commercial planting soon followed. Blueberry acreage reached 2,200 acres by 1950 and 9,700 acres by 1976. Today Michigan has almost 21,000 acres of blueberries on about 600 farms. About 600 more acres are located in northern Indiana, just south of the state border. Soils: Michigan s blueberry industry is concentrated in southwest Michigan where there are abundant, naturally acidic blueberry soils. Typical sites are in low topographic positions, with a shallow water table. Soils are mostly acidic sandy loams and loamy sands. These mineral soils form on sandy outwash plains or ancient lake bottoms. Some blueberries are on acidic muck soils formed when shallow lakes filled with organic matter. Many of these soils are poorly drained. These low, cold sites with wet, acidic soils are poorly suited for crops other than blueberries or cranberries. The Lake Effect: Another reason blueberries thrive in southwest Michigan is the moderating effect of Lake Michigan. This large body of open water has important effects throughout the year. In winter, open water moderates winter air temperatures. Areas near the lake shore experience -13 o F (-25 o C) once in 10 years, whereas this temperature is reached 3-5 years out of 10 just 80 miles inland. These warmer winter low temperatures reduce the likelihood of winter cold injury and this is why most Michigan blueberries are grown within a few miles of the Lake Michigan shore. The lake also produces abundant snow (as much as 90 inches, 250 cm) along the lakeshore, providing additional protection against winter cold injury. In the spring, the colder lake water delays plant growth, reducing the risk of spring frost injury. Summer temperatures along the lakeshore are cooler than inland sites. The lake waters warm by late summer, prolonging the growing season and delaying the first frosts of autumn. Since Lake Michigan warms and cools more slowly than the Michigan shore, the Michigan growing season is shifted about a month later in time. This allows late season cultivars to be grown in one of the northern most blueberry growing regions in the world. Distribution of Michigan blueberries in 2011. (2011 Michigan Fruit Rotational Survey. 2012)

Production: The Michigan blueberry industry has a long history and many mature plantings. About half the acreage is over 40 years old, and some plantings are over 60. Michigan blueberry yields average about 5,000 pounds per acre. There is a wide disparity between older, minimally managed fields (2-3,000 pounds) and newer, irrigated, well-managed fields (10,000 pounds or more). There are also differences in varietal yields. Earlier harvesting varieties generally yield less than late season varieties where the fruit remains on the bush longer. Current production is between 75 and 110 million pounds a year from almost 20,000 bearing acres. Several environmental factors influence blueberry yields every year. The growing conditions in the late summer and early fall determines flower or fruit bud set. This determines the crop potential the next year. Spring freezes, poor pollination due to cool rainy weather during bloom, and summer drought significantly influence the blueberry crop each year on different farms or production regions in the state. Varieties: Many different varieties of blueberries are grown in Michigan. Blueberries are long lived and planting can be productive for many years. The most numerous varieties and 2011 acreages in order of ripening are; Duke (725 A), Bluejay (445 A), Bluecrop (5,500 A), Rubel (1,500 A), Jersey (6,600 A), Liberty (440 A) and Elliot (3,450 A). Rubel was one of the earliest varieties planted in Michigan and remains popular for processing. Jersey, an old adaptable variety, is the backbone of the Michigan industry (32% of acreage). The mid-season variety Bluecrop is the second most common variety (26%). Most new plantings are of early and late season varieties. Duke and Draper are the most planted early varieties. With the increase in US blueberry production, the price advantage of early Michigan berries has declined and growers are more interested in planting late season varieties. The late-ripening, highly productive variety Elliott has been very important for years. Liberty and Aurora are two new late-season varieties being planted. Other new Michigan Blueberry Planting 2007-2011 Jersey 4% Aurora 6% Draper 9% Bluecrop 14% Liberty 19% Elliott 33% varieties developed by both public and private breeding programs are also being planted to test their suitability to Michigan conditions. Many growers will plant small plots to determine a variety s strengths and weaknesses before planting thousands of plants on many acres. Duke 8% Other 7%

Michigan blueberry acres by year of planting (Mich. Ag. Stat. Serv.) Year planted Variety Pre-1981 1982-91 1992-2001 2002-11 Totals Aurora 0 0 0 180 180 Bluecrop 2,530 1,645 715 610 5,500 Blueray 280 114 39 12 445 Bluejay 49 176 37 28 290 Bluetta 93 41 9 12 155 Brigitta 3 8 58 1 70 Burlington 105 30 25 7 165 Draper 3 2 5 200 210 Duke 5 109 280 320 725 Elliott 250 955 890 1,305 3,450 Jersey 5,370 830 265 135 6,600 Liberty 0 0 20 420 440 Nelson 0 1 79 60 165 Northland 30 53 28 39 150 Rancocas 120 4 11 0 135 Rubel 1,160 178 82 80 1,500 Michigan acreage 10,440 4,250 2,610 3,600 20,900 Planting: Blueberries require acid soils with a ph of 4.5 to 5.5 with an optimum ph of about 4.8. Preparing the site for planting may take several years. Most growers plant two-year old plants. These are purchased from established wholesale nurseries. Some growers propagate their own plants from cuttings. Planting occurs in the spring or fall. Fall planting is preferred because spring planting is often delayed by wet field conditions. In Michigan, it takes 8 to 12 years for blueberries to reach full size and maximum yields. It is recommended that flowers and fruit be removed for the first 2 to 3 years to promote bush growth and preventing fruit production from stunting plant growth. Replanting blueberries is rare due to the cost and the long establishment period. Irrigation/nutrition: Irrigation is needed for maximum yields. About 79% of Michigan acreage is irrigated. Solid set overhead sprinklers are very common (53%) because they can also be used for spring frost protection during bloom. Drip irrigation is used on less than 15% of acres, usually on farms with limited water supplies. Traveling guns (8%) and sub-irrigation (3%) are also used. Most new plantings are irrigated with overhead sprinklers or drip irrigation. Some new plantings utilize dual systems, with both overhead sprinklers and drip irrigation systems. Plant nutrition is monitored by soil testing to determine the soil ph and soil potash levels, and tissue analysis to determine the plant nutrient levels and to diagnose problems. Most growers apply 50-80 lbs. per acre of actual nitrogen as ammonium sulfate if the soil ph is above 5 or urea if the soil ph is below 5. Micronutrient foliar sprays are common. Insect and Disease Pests: Since blueberries are native to Michigan, a variety of native pests and diseases are common. Fields may be sprayed 2 to 12 times with pesticides depending on pest pressure and the grower s management intensity. Serious insect pests include direct pests of the fruit such as blueberry maggot, cranberry and cherry fruitworms and indirect pests such as leafrollers, tussock moth, Japanese beetle, blueberry gall wasp and blueberry aphids. As in other blueberry production regions, the invasive insect pest, the spotted winged drosophila has become a major problem in recent years. Mummyberry, anthracnose and alternaria fruit rots, and phomopsis canker and twig blight are the most serious fungal diseases. Typically spray programs include prebloom and bloom fungicides for mummyberry, postbloom sprays for cherry and cranberry fruitworm and

anthracnose fruit rot, midseason fungicides to reduce fruit rots, and pre-harvest and harvest treatments for fruit rots, blueberry maggot and spotted winged drosophila. Late treatments near harvest may be applied with aircraft because tractors and sprayers in the field knock ripening fruit off the bush. Virus diseases have a significant impact on the Michigan blueberry industry. Many older blueberry fields are infected with viruses and yields can be reduced to about half that of uninfected plantings. Shoestring is the most common virus disease in Michigan. Shoestring is spread by the blueberry aphid. Mechanical harvesters increase the disease by carrying infected aphids down the row and throughout the field. Necrotic ringspot (tobacco ringspot) is a nematode vectored virus. This virus common in many weeds and is found in patches in infected fields. Other virus diseases include blueberry leaf mottle and blueberry mosaic. A serious source of infection is the unintentional use of virus infected cuttings by growers propagating their own plants. Michigan has a quarantine restricting the importation of blueberry plants to prevent the importation of new viruses such as blueberry scorch and blueberry shock. Harvesting: Blueberry harvest in Michigan usually runs from early July to late-september. Harvest begins in the southwest and moves northward. The northern production areas lag several weeks behind the south in harvest timing. Peak volumes are harvested from mid-july to late-august. Many Michigan blueberries (and nearly all processed berries) are harvested with machines. Mechanical harvesters straddle the row shaking the bushes to remove ripe berries. Berries are caught and conveyed into plastic field lugs that carry about 20 lbs. of fruit. Lugs are transported by truck to processing facilities. Fields are machine harvested 2 or more times. Fruit that is to be marketed fresh is generally harvested by hand. Hand harvesting is done almost entirely by skilled migrant labor. Hand harvest allows pickers to select ripe fruit with little bruising. Picking crews may move from farm to farm harvesting the fruit. A blueberry packer may employ a large picking crew and purchase fruit on the bush from small growers when it is harvested. Fruit for the fresh market are harvested more frequently to avoid soft overripe fruit. Some fresh market fruit is also machine picked, and technology to do this is improving. The ability to machine harvest fruit for the fresh market depends on the fruit firmness of the variety, the weather conditions before and during harvest, and the design of the harvester and the skill of the operator. Often the first picking is by hand for fresh market fruit and later the field is harvested by machine for either the fresh or process market depending on the fruit condition and the current fresh market price. About half the Michigan blueberry crop is marketed in the fresh market and half is frozen. Many growers focus entirely on producing fruit for the frozen process market. Grading and Packaging. Berries are graded at the receiving station. Containers of berries are dumped onto conveyors that carry the berries to blowers that remove leaves, sticks, and underweight berries. Berries for the fresh market are air cleaned and sorted. Berries for the processing market are surface sterilized in a water dump. Most Michigan fresh and process lines use electronic sorting machines to grade fruit for color and firmness, which remove over and under ripe fruit. Berries for the fresh market are packed in several sizes of plastic clamshells and 2.5, 5 and 10 pound boxes. Process berries are frozen in 30 pound boxes. Some berries are individually quick frozen (IQF) before being boxed. Marketing: Currently less than half of Michigan blueberry growers belong to MBG Marketing The Blueberry People, which originated as the Michigan Blueberry Growers Association. MBG provides off-farm marketing for their grower members. Some MBG growers have on-farm retail sales as well. Large independent growers market their berries with large berry marketers, brokers or in produce trade publications for large volume sales. Smaller Michigan blueberry growers sell their berries directly to packers or processors. The berries may be sold on the bush to the harvesting grower or delivered directly to a packer or processor. Many growers offer on farm sales as U-pick or picked fruit at farm stands. Some growers also do wholesale sales to produce stands and other farm markets. Small growers participate in farmers markets. Packers of fresh fruit distribute their berries either

through MBG s marketing chain, alliances with other berry marketing firms, independent brokers or by direct sales to grocery stores and chains. Distribution of berries is almost entirely by refrigerated trucks. Fresh berries are often in mixed loads with other summer produce, so the temperature is warmer than the optimum storage temperature for blueberries. Late season berries may be stored for several weeks in modified atmosphere to capture the higher prices at the end of the season in October. Michigan Blueberry Production 1992 to 2014, acres, yields and prices Year Harvested Yield Total Value Price Fresh Process Percent Acres Lb./A (M#) ($1,000) (lb.) Million (lb.) Price Million (lb.) Price Fresh 2014 19,000 4,840 92 $114,320 $1.24 44 $1.70 48 $0.64 48% 2013 19,000 6,000 114 $121,200 $1.06 48 $1.90 66 $0.60 42% 2012 19,700 4,420 87 $122,700 $1.41 33 $2.00 45 $1.05 38% 2011 18,700 3,870 72 $118,700 $1.65 34 $2.15 38 $1.20 47% 2010 18,600 5,860 109 $134,300 $1.23 49 $1.70 60 $1.23 45% 2009 18,500 5,350 99 $101,850 $1.03 50 $1.65 49 $0.42 51% 2008 18,600 5,910 110 $124,000 $1.13 40 $1.70 70 $0.80 36% 2007 18,500 5,030 93 $164,456 $1.78 30 $2.05 63 $1.65 32% 2006 18,100 4,970 90 $149,655 $1.66 29 $2.15 61 $1.43 32% 2005 16,800 3,930 66 $83,500 $1.27 25 $1.70 41 $1.00 38% 2004 17,400 4,600 80 $97,210 $1.22 36 $1.60 44 $0.90 45% 2003 15,900 3,900 62 $63,120 $1.02 24 $1.30 38 $0.84 39% 2002 16,900 3,790 64 $52,240 $0.82 22 $1.21 42 $0.61 34% 2001 16,800 4,170 70 $54,660 $0.78 21 $1.09 55 $0.55 30% 2000 16,700 3,710 62 $55,160 $0.89 19 $1.25 43 $0.73 31% 1999 16,600 4,220 70 $54,660 $0.78 18 $1.13 52 $0.66 26% 1998 16,400 2,990 49 $30,260 $0.62 16 $0.86 33 $0.50 33% 1997 16,500 4,360 72 $50,042 $0.70 19 $0.99 53 $0.59 26% 1996 16,500 2,550 42 $36,330 $0.87 15 $1.00 27 $0.79 36% 1995 16,300 4,110 67 $33,450 $0.50 19 $0.75 48 $0.40 28% 1994 15,500 3,030 47 $25,180 $0.54 15 $0.74 32 $0.44 32% 1993 15,500 5,610 87 $34,650 $0.40 19 $0.75 68 $0.30 22% 1992 13,000 2,620 34 $27,100 $0.80 10 $1.15 24 $0.65 29% Ave 4,341 76 $80,380 $1.02 28 $1.41 48 $0.78 36% References: Hull, J. and E. Hanson, 2009. The Fruit Industry. In: Michigan Geology and Geography. Schaetzl, R., J. Darden and D. Brandt (eds.). Custom Publishing. New York, NY, pp. 584-600. Longstroth, M.A. 2005. Blueberries in Michigan, USA. In: N.F. Childers and P.M Lyrene (eds.). Blueberries for Growers, Gardeners, and Promoters. Dr. Norman F. Childers Publications, Gainesville FL. pp. 198-205. Michigan Crop Reporting Service. 1976. Michigan Blueberry Survey 1975. Michigan Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012. Michigan Fruit Inventory, 2010-2011. Michigan Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012. Michigan Fruit Production, 2011.