Effect of Yeast Propagation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency

Similar documents
Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

Beauty and the Yeast - part II

For Beer with Character

POLLUTION MINIMIZATION BY USING GAIN BASED FERMENTATION PROCESS

Chair J. De Clerck IV. Post Fermentation technologies in Special Beer productions Bottle conditioning: some side implications

Advanced Yeast Handling. BFD education Kai Troester

Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

When quality comes first. Solutions for craft brewers

DDGS Sulfur Content. Sources And Possible Ways To Maintain Lower Levels Distillers Grain Technology Council Symposium

Microbiologist. QA Lab at Boulevard Brewing Co. Production QA Member of A.S.B.C. Sensory Specialist, Beer Judge

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

An Investigation of Methylsufonylmethane as a Fermentation Aid. Eryn Bottens, Jeb Z Hollabaugh, and Thomas H. Shellhammer.

YEAST STARTERS. Brewers make wort, YEAST MAKE BEER. A few keys to turning GOOD homebrew into GREAT homebrew

RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL

YEAST. ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE October 2009

ALE/LAGER PITCHING RATES

Incorporation of sweet sorghum Juice in the current dry-grind ethanol process for improved ethanol yields, energy saving, and water efficiency

MIC305 Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

Brewing Process all grain

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CO-INOCULATION

Virginie SOUBEYRAND**, Anne JULIEN**, and Jean-Marie SABLAYROLLES*

Optimal Feed Rate for Maximum Ethanol Production. Conor Keith Loyola Marymount University March 2, 2016

Yeast- Gimme Some Sugar

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

Innovations for a better world. Ingredient Handling For bakeries and other food processing facilities

30 YEARS OF FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION IN BRAZIL: identification and selection of dominant industrial yeast strains.

Liquids Handling in Bakeries.

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

Institute of Brewing and Distilling

Timing of Treatment O 2 Dosage Typical Duration During Fermentation mg/l Total Daily. Between AF - MLF 1 3 mg/l/day 4 10 Days

GEA Plug & Win. Triple win centrifuge skids for craft brewers

15/03/ :58. Yeast Selection for Beer Diversity

Dissolved Oxygen. Management. WineEng Experiences in Brewing and Beer. Experiences in Brewing and Beer by David Medlyn, Coopers Brewery

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BREWING PROCESS. Jared Long Head Brewer Altitude Chophouse and Brewery

Sequential Separation of Lysozyme, Ovomucin, Ovotransferrin and Ovalbumin from Egg White

Fermentation of Pretreated Corn Stover Hydrolysate

Prod t Diff erenti ti a on

Making Ethanol 1 of 22 Boardworks Ltd 2012

Good fermentations gone bad. Why? Sigrid Gertsen-Briand Ohio, February 12 th, 2008

Brewhouse technology

Co-inoculation and wine

PRESERVATION METHOD OF YEAST AND PERFORMANCE IN BEER FERMENTATION

The delicate art of wine making. Alfa Laval Foodec decanter centrifuges in the wine industry

Viniflora PRELUDE Product Information

LAGERING WITH THE CONICAL FERMENTER & GLYCOL CHILLER. What is a lager fermentation profile?

SIGMA The results count

/8" lallemandbrewing.com

Novozymes & Gusmer Enterprises WINE ENZYMES SOLUTIONS

HOW TO ACHIEVE A SUCCESSFUL PRISE DE MOUSSE

05/09/ :56. Yeast Selection for Beer Diversity

SOLUTIONS IN BRIX MEASUREMENT

MAKING WINE WITH HIGH AND LOW PH JUICE. Ethan Brown New Mexico State University 11/11/2017

Determination of Alcohol Content of Wine by Distillation followed by Density Determination by Hydrometry

When Good Bugs Go Bad Detection of Beer Spoiling Microorganisms in a Mixed Fermentation Environment

Kilned Versus Roasted: Do You Really Know Your Specialty Malt? DAVID RICHTER June 12, 2015 Briess Malting Company Chilton, Wisconsin

When life throws you lemons, how new innovations and good bacteria selection can help tame the acidity in cool climate wines

CHAPTER 8. Sample Laboratory Experiments

WINE PRODUCTION. Microbial. Wine yeast development. wine. spoilage. Molecular response to. Molecular response to Icewine fermentation

SAFE MILK PRODUCTION IN INDIA AS A STRATEGY FOR BETTER PRODUCER PRICE. A Journey from Quality to Safety KULDEEP SHARMA JUNE

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures

LACTIC ACID FERMENTATION OF BREWERS SPENT GRAIN HYDROLYSATE BY LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM AND LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS

Brewing Tutorial Stove-top partial-boil with specialty grains

The malting process Kilned vs. roasted Specialty grains and steeping Malt extract production

FERMENTATION. By Jeff Louella

INFLUENCE OF THIN JUICE ph MANAGEMENT ON THICK JUICE COLOR IN A FACTORY UTILIZING WEAK CATION THIN JUICE SOFTENING

Pilot technology and equipment to produce baking yeast in shorter multiplication cycle

YEAST Wrangling The Many Flavors of Brewing Yeast CURT WITTENBERG FOR SOCIETY OF BARLEY ENGINEERS OCTOBER 4, 2017

Setting up your fermentation

EXPERIMENT NO. 3 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ASTM D-422

WineEng - NZ Winery Resources Future Challenges. The National Conference & Exhibition of the WEA

Metabolic Engineering of a Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Capable of Utilizing Xylose for Growth and Ethanol Production

Application & Method. doughlab. Torque. 10 min. Time. Dough Rheometer with Variable Temperature & Mixing Energy. Standard Method: AACCI

Mastering Measurements

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. on the traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts

Fermentation: Recent Advances

depend,: upon the temperature, the strain of

Mashing! How? Why? To what extent?!

Dr.Nibras Nazar. Microbial Biomass Production: Bakers yeast

Coconut Sweetening Process. Elizabeth Casey Justin Dillingham Mohd Hussain Brady Stewart

Commercial Ovens. trimarkusa.com

An Economic And Simple Purification Procedure For The Large-Scale Production Of Ovotransferrin From Egg White

fermentation for re-use in a subsequent fermentation. In between fermentations, the cropped

Quality characteristics of set yoghurt blended with Tender Coconut Water Milk - Carrageenan

Effects of ginger on the growth of Escherichia coli

TAPPI KRAFT RECOVERY SHORT COURSE RECAUSTICIZING CHAPTER PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE BY DALE SANCHEZ VECTOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC.

INDEPENDENT, TRADITIONAL, AND INNOVATIVE Flottweg Separators for Craft Breweries

Rapid Analysis of Soft Drinks Using the ACQUITY UPLC H-Class System with the Waters Beverage Analysis Kit

Shades from Shapes. Materials Required. Task 1: Movement of Particles

Optimization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilization in bacterial cellulose by adsorption- incubation method

Getting To Know Your Lacto. Josh Armagost and Dan Ramos The Brewing Science Institute 2016 Rocky Mountain Micro-Brewers Symposium

INITIAL INVESTIGATION ON ACETIC ACID PRODUCTION AS COMMODITY CHEMICAL

BLAST CHILLING METHOD FOR MEAT DISHES COOKING

Supply & Demand for Lake County Wine Grapes. Christian Miller Lake County MOMENTUM April 13, 2015

THOMA AND NEUBAUER IMPROVED CHAMBER COUNTING YEASTS (TIRAGE)

Fermentation Essentials

Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White

The Brabender GlutoPeak A new type of dough rheology

WHITE PAPER. New processing methods for recombined white milk

Tartrate Stability. Mavrik North America Bob Kreisher, Ph.D

Transcription:

Effect of Yeast Propagation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency Chris Richards Ethanol Technology 4 th European Bioethanol Technology Meeting Detmold, Germany April 16, 2008

Objective of Propagation To supply yeast at correct time into the fermentor with the following properties! Adequate numbers/ ml! High viability! High vitality! Low contamination! Log growth phase

Growth phases of yeast in propagator Generic Yeast Growth 500 Lag Log Stationary 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 10 0 50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hours Yeast count

In-plant yeast propagation is NEVER completely successful!! Typical Goals:! Increase yeast cell numbers in-house! Reduce lag times! Increase fermentation rates! Decrease overall fermentation times True Propagation Requires Pure Yeast Culture, Low Carbohydrate, High Oxygen! Pure yeast culture not available in commercial quantities (cost prohibitive)! Requires specialized equipment and expertise Best left to yeast production plant What is propagation Objective is lower yeast costs Is this actually achieved?

Special case Only two options Continuous Fermentation 1. Prefermentor with or without refreshing of yeast 2. Yeast recycle some minor options within process Prefermentor commonly used in continuous processes where fermenters contain high levels of solids (e.g. grain solids) Yeast recycle commonly used in continuous processes where fermenters have low levels of solids (e.g. sugar / molasses utilization) Both these processes have very similar pros & cons

Continuous Propagation Saccharification Equal flow out of propagator Continuous flow 1/4 th of mash flow Propagator Fermentor Fermentor Air injection

Continuous Fermentation Yeast Recycle Saccharification Fermentor Fermentor Fermentor Beerwell Yeast slurry Centrifuge Beer feed Distillation

Pros & Cons Prefermentor / Yeast recycle Pros Minimal cleaning High cell count Minimal yeast usage Easily automated Cons Steady state of yeast to mash feed Yeast forced into stationary phase (low budding) Depletion of sterols & unsaturated fatty acids High potential for yeast mutation High risk of bacterial infection High risk of selection of fast growing bacteria or wild yeasts Difficult to clean Very high stress on yeast in fermenter train due to steady state Lower alcohol limit on system

Types of propagation options for batch fermentation Types of in-plant Yeast handling Continuous propagation Semi-continuous propagation Multiple batch propagation Single batch propagation Rehydration only direct pitch Direct pitch

Continuous Process Flows Liquefaction / Cook Continuous flow Equal flow out of propagator 1/10 th of mash flow Fermentor Propagator Air injection

Continuous Propagation Propagator maintains level & yeast count Flow in matches flow out Feed to fermentor throughout fill time 100% yeast in fermentor at 100% fill Fermentor Fill Propagator Level Yeast Count Time Time Time

Semi-Continuous Process Flows Liquefaction / Cook Continuous flow Variable flow out of propagator 1/10 th of mash flow Propagator Fermentor Air injection

Semi Continuous Propagation Propagator maintains yeast count Slug dose at start of fill (4%) Feed to fermentor throughout fill time once propagator regains level 100% yeast in ferm at 100% fill Fermentor Fill Propagator Level Yeast Count Time Time Time

Multiple Batch Process Flows Liquefaction / Cook Continuous flow Variable flow out of propagator 1/10 th of mash flow Propagator Fermentor Air injection

Multiple Batch Propagation Yeast count increases following dilution Slug dose at start of fill (4%) & possibly 40-50% Feed to propagator is fast fill & stop 100% yeast in fermentor at 50% fill Fermentor Fill Propagator Level 10 20% inoculation Yeast Count Time Time Time

Single Batch Process Flows Liquefaction / Cook Variable flow fast fill of propagator Propagator Variable flow out of propagator Fermentor Air injection

Single Batch Propagation Yeast count increases following dilution Propagator emptied at start of fill (4%) Feed to propagator is fast fill & stop 100% yeast in fermentor at 5% fill Ability to optimize propagator time Fermentor Fill Propagator Level Yeast Count Time Time Time

Propagation Optimization Lag Log Stationary Yeast Count Budding Time

Direct Pitch Liquefaction / Cook Calculated yeast dose Fermentor Yeast Tote Flow Rinse / CIP

Direct Pitch 100% yeast in at start of fermentor fill Fermentor Fill Requires higher yeast dose Time Ability to optimize dose & time of addition easily Yeast Tote Level Time

Pros & cons (Batch fermentation systems) Continuous Cell Numbers at start " Sterol reserve " Time yeast in " Log phase " Infection risk " Mutation wild yeast " Viability Vitality " Hygiene " Optimization " Automation Reduced Lag phase Yeast value " Handling

Is Stationary phase forced? Dilution Effect Total feed = 90 litres / min Yeast doubling time = 2.5 hours Yeast volume at start Cell count 410 million Volume 64,260 litre 26,346,000,000,000,000 cells Yeast volume after 2.5 hours Cell count 410 million Volume 77,800 litre 31,925,880,000,000,000 cells Assuming the original cells double, & the final volume increased by 13,400 L the theoretical cell count should be 676 million

Pros & cons (Batch fermentation systems) Continuous Semicontin Multiple Batch Single Batch Cell Numbers at start " $ $ Sterol reserve " " " Time yeast in " " $ Log phase " " $ Infection risk " " " Mutation wild yeast " " " Viability Vitality " " " $ Hygiene " " " Optimization " " " Automation $ $ $ Reduced Lag phase $ Yeast value " " " Handling "

Offset of full yeast cost? Value of alcohol in fermenter?! 2,000,000 x 17%(v/v) = 340,000 litre! 340,000 @ 0.49 = 166,600 500.00 equivalent = 500/0.49 = 1020 litres Alcohol required to achieve break-even! (340,000+1020)/2,000,000! 340,836/2,000,000 = 0.1704 = 17.05%

Single Batch - Cons Increased yeast cost?! Equates to 0.0015 per litre Increased cleaning! Simple - Gives improved hygiene performance

Single Batch - Cons Increased handling! Does require increase in operator handling! Amount depends on previous system Lag/rehydration phase at beginning! Design good SOPs to allow a hydration step & to reduce lag effect! Or use fresh yeast (Thermosacc / Liquid Yeast) which has no rehydration required & has short lag! Or increase yeast food to get faster growth and metabolism resulting in increased numbers

Pros & cons (Batch fermentation systems) Single Batch Direct Pitch Cell Numbers at start $ Sterol reserve Time yeast in Log phase Infection risk Mutation wild yeast Viability Vitality $ Hygiene Optimization Automation $ Reduced Lag phase $ $ Yeast value $ Handling "

Actual Plant Data - No lag phase in growth observed 800 Traditional Continuous Propagator with 30% heal 0 - Yeast growth slower and stages down over time (2.6 to 5.5 to 7.8hr -1 ) - Higher yeast counts obtained cell count (10^6 cells 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Cell Growth Stops Here plant data cell kinetics doubling time (hr) Poly. (plant data) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 cell number doubling tim - Stationary phase reached (this test) 0 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 hours Kurt Kohler, 2004

Actual Plant Data Single Propagator Example 1 -Dry yeast used in propagator - Lag phase in growth observed - Yeast growth very rapid (<1.2hr -1 ) cell coun 300 250 200 150 100 50 cell kinetics model plant data hours to yeast doubling 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 hours to yeast doub 0 3.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 hour Kurt Kohler, 2004

Actual Plant Data Mash Density vs ethanol at drop 8.9 Mash Dens 8.85 8.8 8.75 8.7 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 % Alcohol w/v at drop Continuous Single Single Kurt Kohler, 2004

Value to a ethanol plant On a daily basis a 190 million litre plant will realize increased alcohol production of approximately 17,000 litres Which at a price of 0.49/litre would net an extra revenue of 8,330 or 2.85 million per annum Some US plants achieving 20% v/v using very high gravity (VHG) fermentations Converted from Kurt Kohler, 2004

Objective of Propagation To supply yeast at correct time into the fermentor with the following properties! Adequate numbers/ ml! High viability! High vitality! Low contamination! Log growth phase

Comparison of systems Adequate numbers High Viability High Vitality Log phase Low Contamination Optimal timing Continuous " " " " Semi - continuous " " " $ Multiple Batch $ " $ Single Batch $ Direct Pitch $

Conclusions Consider your production needs when selecting your system (Continuous / Batch / Direct) Consider your choice of yeast forms (Fresh vs. ADY) Select the system and the yeast that will allow you to achieve your original objectives Remember it is the yeast that makes your yield Effective yeast management will enhance your profits