Sweet Corn. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

Similar documents
Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Corn Growth and Development

Corn Earworm: Is It Resistant to Pyrethroids?

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

What s New in Vegetable Insect Management

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

A Review of Corn Earworm and Other Insect Problems in 2011

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Report of Progress 961

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

European corn borer. Cutworm management. Sweet corn insect pests. Sweet Corn Insect Management. Corn flea beetle management. Western corn rootworms

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Managing Navel Orangeworm (NOW) in Walnuts. Kathy Kelley Anderson Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

Water Street Solutions Aerial Crop Tour /30/15

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Southern Illinois Ornamental Corn Variety Trial,

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2005

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

What went wrong. Pepper Sunscald. In this issue, find out what might have gone wrong with your vegetable harvest this season.

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2004

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

MANAGING INSECT PESTS IN BERRIES AND FRUITS. Small Farm School 8 September 2012 Bruce Nelson, CCC Horticulture Department

Crops - Commercial. Grain Sorghum

CHESAPEAKE FARMLINE August 2, 2011

Corn VEGETABLE CROPS PRODUCTION GUIDE FOR THE ATLANTIC PROVINCES. Prepared by the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON VEGETABLE CROPS

2012 Guide to Bt Corn for Georgia

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2008

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

1

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Some Common Insect Enemies

., - ' :::.11 C' ' MBRAR'i I/~ SWEET CORN. Yukio Nakagawa FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY. Extension Circular 377 University of Hawaii April 1, 1957

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Sweet Corn PROCESSOR MARKET CROP GUIDE

Additional comments su type

Vegetable pest observations 8/2/07 by C. Welty

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Crops - Commercial. Grain Sorghum

1. What is the proper seeding depth for Alfalfa? a. 2 inches b. 1 ½ inches c. 1 inch d. ½ inch

Crops - Commercial. Soybean

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Elk Mound Seed. Company Introduction

The Courtship of Honeybees, Buckwheat and Watermelon Blossoms

Peach and Nectarine Cork Spot: A Review of the 1998 Season

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

1. What is the proper seeding depth for Alfalfa? a. ½ inch b. 1 ½ inches c. 1 inch d. 2 inches

Dry Beans XIII-5 Mexican Bean Beetle

Annual Grass Control in Sweet Corn by Doug

Sunflower Moth Control Using Chlorantraniliprole (Dupont or Besiege) vs. Common Insecticides Final Report

2010 Area Crops Evaluation Exam

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Sweet Corn Variety Performance

Physiology, Orchard Establishment, Cultivars, Training/Pruning. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

INSECTS IN COMMERCIALLY GROWN SWEET CORN

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

New Insect Traits in Corn. Glenn Studebaker Extension Entomologist

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

ational Sunflower Survey: An Overview

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Monitoring and Controlling Grape Berry Moth in Texas Vineyards

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Transcription:

Sweet Corn Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm Where: Grand Gallery (main level) Room E & F MI Recertification credits: 2 (1B, COMM CORE, PRIV CORE) OH Recertification credits: 1 (presentations as marked) CCA Credits: PM(1.0) CM(1.0) Moderator: Ben Phillips, Vegetable Extension Educator, MSU Extension, Saginaw, MI 2:00 pm Sweet Corn Insect Control Update (OH: 2B, 0.5 hr) Rick Foster, Entomology Dept., Purdue Univ. 2:30 pm Sweet Corn Weed Control Update (OH: 2C or 3p, 0.5 hr) Mark VanGessel, Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Delaware 3:00 pm Steps to Maximizing Yield Ron Goldy, Senior Vegetable Educator, MSU Extension, Benton Harbor, MI 3:30 pm Sweet Corn Genetics and Looking Ahead to the Future Derrill Kregel, Rispens Seeds, Inc., Beecher, IL 4:00 pm Session Ends

Sweet Corn Insect Management Update Rick Foster, Department of Entomology, Purdue University The corn earworm is by far the most important insect pest of sweet corn in the Midwest. Few if any earworms overwinter in northern Indiana or Michigan, so most of the damage comes from moths that migrate from the southern US. This migration impacts management of earworms in several ways. First, early planted sweet corn is unlikely to suffer severe earworm damage. However, there will occasionally be an early migration, so growers should have pheromone traps in place when their first sweet corn plantings begin to tassel. Second, tropical storms in the Gulf of Mexico or other storm fronts moving northward from the South can suddenly bring large numbers of earworm moths to our fields, with the potential for severe levels of damage. Again, pheromone traps are essential for being alerted to these flights. Finally, the susceptibility of earworms to pyrethroid insecticides depends on where the migrants originated. If their origin was an area where pyrethroid insecticides were widely used to control insect on corn, soybean, cotton, sorghum and other crops, there is a good likelihood that they will be highly resistant to pyrethroids when we use them on our sweet corn. Female moths tend to lay eggs on fresh green silks. Once the eggs hatch, the young larvae move down the silks into the tip of the ear, where they are protected from insecticides. The window of opportunity for control is the brief period of time between egg hatch and entrance into the ear tip. Growers must have a lethal dose of insecticide present on the silk when the larva crawls across it to achieve control. There are three primary requirements for achieving acceptable levels of insecticidal control of most insects, including corn earworms: 1. Proper choice of insecticide 2. Proper placement of insecticide 3. Proper timing of application 1. Proper choice of insecticide. For many years, the pyrethroid insecticides provided excellent control of earworms and most other pests of sweet corn. These products are still very effective (and relatively inexpensive) for control of corn borers, fall armyworms, and other pests, but in recent years have failed to provide acceptable levels of control of corn earworm due to resistance issues. Our research trials over the past several years have shown that we achieve the most consistent levels of control with Coragen (DuPont) and Radiant (Dow). There are restrictions on how much of each product can be used, so growers will sometimes need to use more than one product on a single crop. For organic growers, Entrust gives reasonably good control, often comparable to the pyrethroid insecticides. Insecticide Rate Per Acre % Clean Ears Damaged Kernels/Ear Untreated ----- 5.5 b 19.5 a Coragen 5 fl. oz. 88.0 a 1.2 c Radiant 6 fl. oz. 85.3 a 1.6 c Warrior 1.92 fl. oz. 84.0 a 2.2 c Mustang Maxx 4 fl. oz. 68.0 a 3.2 bc Entrust 2 oz. 63.0 a 3.9 bc Table 1. Sweet corn insecticide trial, Lafayette, IN. 2013.

The data listed in Table 1 show the results of a trial conducted in 2013, when the pyrethroid insecticides Warrior and Radiant provided control that was statistically similar to Coragen and Radiant. In Table 2 below, the severity of the problem with corn earworm resistance to the pyrethroids is demonstrated by the poor control achieved with those products. Insecticide Rate Per Acre % Clean Ears Damaged Kernels/Ear Untreated ----- 16.2 c 22.6 a Coragen 5 fl. oz. 89.0 a 1.4 c Warrior 1.92 fl. oz. 52.0 b 6.1 b Mustang Maxx 4 fl. oz. 66.0 b 4.8 bc Entrust 2 oz. 66.0 b 4.7 bc Table 2. Sweet corn insecticide trial, Lafayette, IN. 2016 2. Proper Placement of insecticide. Last year I spoke about the importance of coverage, having insecticide present on the silks between the egg and the tip of the ear so that when the young larvae emerges from the egg it encounters a lethal dose of insecticide before it reaches the security of the ear tip. I also showed how my boom sprayer with drop nozzles provided excellent coverage, as demonstrated by this photograph of water sensitive cards placed on the silks before spraying. Unfortunately, my attempt to compare the coverage from my sprayer to other sprayer types, boom without drops, airblast, and helicopter was unsuccessful due to >100 mph straight line winds that blew down my plot a few days before silking. 3. Proper Timing of Application Proper timing of applications has several aspects: a. What levels of moth catches in pheromone traps will result in sufficient damage to justify spraying insecticides? b. When should I put on my first spray? c. What interval should I use between sprays? d. When should I stop spraying? Research that we have been conducting for a number of years has shown that the spray threshold, as defined by pheromone trap catch, is dependent on the stage of the neighboring dent corn. Early in the

season when your sweet corn is silking prior to neighboring dent corn reaching the reproductive stage, you should treat your sweet corn if you catch any moths in your trap. This is because your field will be the most attractive place for female moths to lay their eggs. When dent corn reaches the silk stage, you can raise the spray threshold to 10 moths per night, because your sweet corn is now competing with all the neighboring dent corn for the attention of moths for egg laying. After the dent corn silks have turned brown, your silking sweet corn is again the most attractive site for earworm moths, and you should again use the 1 moth per night threshold. At this time, moth catches will often be far above that level. For a number of years, I have recommended putting on the first spray when your field is at 70% silk. In the past few years, I have begun to question whether this was too late. This year I designed a study to try to determine if sprays initiated earlier. I planted on four dates, April 18, May 13, June 7, and July 1. As plants approached silking, I inspected 400 plants daily to determine the first silks and then to estimate the percentage silking in the plot daily until four days after first silk. I then began spraying treatments based on the relationship to first silk. First Spray Spray Dates April 18 May 12 June 7 Untreated ----- 91.5 a 98.5 95.5 First Silk (Day 0) 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 99.0 b 100 98.5 Day 1 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 99.5 b 100 99.0 Day 2 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 99.5 b 100 98.0 Day 3 3, 6, 9, 12 99.0 b 98.5 99.5 Day 4 4, 6, 9, 12 99.0 b 100 99.5 P>F 0.005 NS NS Table 3. Percentage clean ears sweet corn trial where treatment was initiated on different days relative to the beginning of silking, Lafayette, IN, 2016. Earworm populations were quite low during all three of these planting so the various treatments were not subject to a good test (Table 3). However, we can determine that under low pressure, the date of initiation of treatment did not affect the level of control achieved. Unfortunately, the July 1 planting, when moth counts in the pheromone trap were much higher, was knocked over by severe winds and so no data were collected. One additional piece of information gathered in this study was that the April 18 and May 12 plantings had reached 47.5 and 46.8% silking, respectively, by Day 3, while the June 7 planting had reached 75.5% silking on Day 3. This emphasizes the importance of estimating the percentage of silking plants rather than just waiting a certain number of days after first silk. As for the interval between sprays, there are several factors that determine the proper number of days. Generally, I don t recommend spraying more frequently than every two days because it takes a minimum of 2-3 days for eggs to hatch. Assuming you have good coverage, there should always be insecticide residue between the egg and ear tip if you spray with that interval. If populations are extremely low, as evidenced by pheromone trap catch, that interval can be expanded to 4-5 days. However, this leaves a window for a few earworms to reach the ear tips, but the assumption is that the numbers are not going to be enough to justify the time and expense of spraying. When populations are extremely high, I recommend spraying every two days, with the high rate of your best insecticide. Tank mixing more than one mode of action, for example a pyrethroid with Coragen, may be beneficial under extreme circumstances. Finally, the decision about when to cease spraying is again dependent on plant phenology and insect behavior. Earworm moths do not prefer to lay eggs on brown silks, so when 80-90% of the silks have turned, your field is no longer very attractive for egg laying and you can stop spraying. As a note of

caution, earworms will occasionally lay eggs on brown silks when there is nothing in the area that is attractive for egg laying, but this if fairly uncommon. In summary, managing earworms effectively require that growers put on the right insecticide at the right time and at the right place. Understanding the egg-laying behavior of the earworm, monitoring its flight activity, knowing the window of susceptibility of the sweet corn crop, and applying insecticides at the correct time and place will help growers to achieve the earworm control they desire.

Steps to Maximizing Sweet Corn Yield Dr. Ron Goldy, Senior Extension Educator Michigan State University Extension Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center 1791 Hillandale Road, Benton Harbor, MI 49022 goldy@anr.msu.edu Maximizing yield is a goal for producers of all crops since maximum yield generally means maximum return. To obtain maximum yields is a step-wise process and has to be viewed as a package and to leave out one step influences the effectiveness of the others. In this presentation I will outline those steps I have found to be important to maximize yields. Some areas are clearly more important than others while the importance of others can change with season and location. Genetics: Starting with varieties capable of obtaining high yields is the first step. This will not be the case for early varieties (those less than 70 days to maturity). Early varieties have been developed first for earliness. Plants of early varieties grow and develop ears quickly. Plants are smaller than main season varieties and therefore produce smaller ears. High yielding varieties have maturity dates starting around 75 days. Varieties 75 days and above will have longer and larger diameter ears and more rows of kernels. Early varieties should be used only for the early season market to capture and keep customers into the main season. Most growers have a variety they like and stick with it through the main season. Seed companies are constantly developing new varieties that growers should be evaluating at least on a small scale to see how they will perform. Nutrition: Sweet corn is a large, fast growing plant requiring adequate nutrient levels for maximum yields. As always, start with a soil test and follow the directions for ph, calcium, magnesium, phosphorous and potassium. If you are on a sandy site, I would also have a sulfur and boron test done. These two are not part of the standard test and will cost extra but would be worth it to find out if they are limiting. Boron plays an important role in pollination and a lot of pollination goes on in a corn field. The soil test will tell you how much of each nutrient to add for optimum yield. Nitrogen initiates the largest response with high yields requiring 150 pounds or more per acre. Actual amount will vary somewhat with soil type, previous crop, plant population and irrigation. All nutrients except nitrogen can be applied as a broadcast prior to planting. Nitrogen should be split into at least two if not three applications. One application can go on with the pre-plant broadcast. The other two should be put on when plants are 16 and 24 tall. The post plant side dress applications can be solid, liquid or anhydrous depending on existing equipment. Irrigation: Probably the biggest piece of the puzzle most growers are missing is irrigation. Without adequate moisture plants cannot reach their genetic potential, they cannot utilize nutrients effectively and plant populations cannot be maximized. If at all possible find a way to irrigate! If you don t irrigate you will have to drop plant population. Irrigation also has to be used wisely. If you have irrigation don t irrigate too long at one time otherwise it is a waste of water and nutrients can be rinsed or leached away. If you make a commitment to irrigation, keep it up, don t back off mid-season. Once plants get used to having water and establish growth patterns it will hurt their performance if you don t continue. Plant Population: Typical sweet corn plantings are 8 10 inches in the row and 30-inches between rows. That provides plant populations of roughly 21,000-26,000 plants/acre. With the right genetics combined with adequate fertilizer and water, plant populations can easily be raised to six inches in the row and 30-

inches between rows for a plant population of almost 35,000 plants per acre. I caution you to not raise it this high if you aren t going to supply the needed fertilizer and water. At this level you won t get many second ears, but that s okay since second ears don t have the quality desired anyway. Insect Control: The insects of most concern are European corn borer and corn earworm. These are best controlled with timely insecticide applications. Be careful when spraying during bloom since corn is a pollen source collected by bees. Genetically modified corn varieties that control these insects are available but presently do not have the necessary public acceptance for large scale plantings. Other insects that need monitoring and possible control are aphids, rootworm, wireworm, cutworms, flea beetles and others. Some are controlled through seed treatment while others need monitoring during the season. Contact your local Extension Educator for the latest control recommendations. Vertebrate Control: Birds and raccoons present the largest vertebrate threat. Deer browse on silks and other plant parts but do not cause the level of damage presented by birds and raccoons. The birds of most concern are crows and starlings and keeping them away can be difficult. Crows are a concern because of their individual size and numbers in a family group. Starlings are a concern because of their large numbers. Electronic distress calls, propane cannons and other noise makers have been employed with some effectiveness. Growers have also used owl decoys placed on poles. Something that works for crows it to shoot one and hang it up in the planting. From personal experience this works for a distance of about 200 feet either side of the dead crow. After this distance another crow needs to be shot and hung up. Shooting crows can be difficult as they are quite smart and wary of people. Corn ears having a husk that completely covers the tips may also deter bird damage since it hides the kernels. I am convinced that some birds are actually after the corn ear worms in the tip and eating the corn is a secondary benefit. It only takes a few bird pecks to make an ear unmarketable. Raccoon damage can be distinguished from birds by the amount of stalk damage raccoons cause. Raccoons reach up and pull the ear down tearing it off the plant or in some cases breaking the plant completely. Raccoons are a problem because not only do they eat a lot individually but they also have a lot of friends they invite to the party. Damage will be heaviest near a woods. So planting further away from a woods is the first step. Raccoons are best controlled by a two or three strand electric fence surrounding the planting. Aluminum foil with some peanut butter on it attached to the fence can increase effectiveness. Some growers will use live traps and go into a relocation program but that has limited effectiveness if the population is high. Weed Control: Good weed control is usually a matter of doing the right thing at the right time. Most weed control products for corn are pre-emergent herbicides applied shortly after planting. These providesix to eight weeks of control. After this time the corn itself is large enough that it can shade out some weeds or is large enough that weeds do not have that much of an impact. To get good control from a pre-emergent the right rate has to be combined with the soil type. If weeds are not properly controlled, then all the other steps can be jeopardized. Weeds will add competition for space, nutrients and water and time and money spent on those steps will have been wasted. Contact your local Extension Educator for the latest control recommendations. Disease Control: Corn is susceptible to several diseases but few are debilitating. Diseases of biggest concern are smut, Stewart s wilt, rust, some virus diseases and more recently Goss s Wilt. Most corn diseases are controlled through genetic tolerance. Stewart s Wilt is transmitted through flea beetles and incidence is higher after mild winters due to higher flea beetle survival. Smut is worse in cool, wet, windy springs that cause more damage to young plants, producing openings for the fungus to enter. I have found rust to be a problem about the time I need to harvest and as long as it hasn t affected the husk leaves no control is needed. Goss s Wilt is fairly new in this area and generally comes in late in the season but it is a disease to pay attention to. Contact your local Extension Educator for the latest control recommendations.

To maximize corn yields it is important to juggle several production aspects. I have outlined eight areas I feel need attention for maximum yield. Below is what I think is their order of importance but to neglect one area to concentrate on others is just not going to work. It does little good to concentrate on 1 to 5 but neglect 6, 7 and 8. It is best to embrace the entire package. 1. Genetics 2. Nutrition 3. Irrigation 4. Plant Spacing 5. Insect Control 6. Vertebrate Control 7. Weed Control 8. Disease Control

11/23/2016 Rispens Seeds 2016 Sweet Corn Research Trial 183 Hybrids Evaluated, Lowell Indiana Derrill Kregel Sweet Corn Product Development/Sales Rispens Seed Beecher Illinois 888 874 0241 y We do detailed notes on the plant, the plant stand and vigor, husk and ear characteristics. Totaling 30 characteristics in all. y This year we added a digital protractor to measure ear angle. 1 = unacceptable Latté(10B055) 67 Day Synergistic Bicolor, Seneca Hybrids 5 = average 9 = excellent Cafe y 67 day Se Yellow y Good ear size y Good quality y Cold soil vigor 1

11/23/2016 Sweetness 68 Day Synergistic Bicolor SE, Crookham Remedy 80 Day Synergistic BiColor, Syngenta Attribute II dmepsps (5 enolpyruvylshikimate 3 phosphate (EPSP) synthase) (herbicide tolerance glyphosate) Vip3A (Insect resistance lepidopteran) In extreme stress, Remedy showed tassel tip and anthers in the ear. Remedy does provide superior insect protection. Aspire Attribute II Uses Bt11, plus Mir 162 Liberty Link and glyphosate tolerant 82 day triple sweet yellow Milky Way Attribute II Uses Bt11, plus Mir 162 Liberty Link and glyphosate tolerant 82 day triple sweet white Kickoff XR (2570 XR) 70 day super sweet bi color High quality, large ear Good cold soil vigor. 2

11/23/2016 Hero XR (2070 XR) Cumberland 74 Day High Quality Sh2 BiColor, Harris Moran 70 day super sweet bi color Good eating quality. Shipper style ear Good cold soil vigor Super Surprise 76 Day High Quality Sh2 BiColor, IFSI Sweet Surprise Super Surprise SS2742 (SSW) 77 day super sweet, bi color Good quality Good cold soil vigor SSW technology uses University of Florida I gene Improved ear length and tip. Rust and MDMV resistance. Abbott & Cobb, Inc. Announces Licensing Agreement with Syngenta, LLC Trevose, PA August 30, 2016 Abbott & Cobb, Inc., a leading developer and marketer of vegetable varieties in the USA and worldwide, announced today that it has completed a long term agreement to license A&C s recently patented technology, SuperSeedWare (SSW ) to Syngenta Seeds, LLC for worldwide use in sweet corn varieties. SuperSeedWare (SSW ) represents the first privately owned, 100% natural, gene type in sweet corn breeding. Syngenta will begin to introgress SSW technology into its proprietary sweet corn genetics. The goals are to deliver enhanced seed quality, germination, and vigor, while maintaining the desirable benefits of conventional supersweet sh2 gene types, in particular, shelf life. The SSW technology can also be used to transform existing sh2 hybrids that are already preferred by growers, into superior performers that generally mature earlier, can germinate in colder or warmer soils and, due to the added vigor, can grow more reliably under various climatic challenges. We are pleased to come to agreement with Syngenta to incorporate our SSW technology into many of its existing sweet corn hybrids while creating newer and more advanced hybrids in the future, said Abbott & Cobb, Inc. President, Art Abbott. With Syngenta s tremendous history and capability in sweet corn development, we expect the SSW technology to become a very significant part of sweet corn breeding. For more information please use this link to learn more about the 100% natural SSW technology. Nirvana(CAPBF10 411) 76 Day High Quality Sh2 BiColor, Crookham 76 day super sweet, bi color Exceptional eating quality Large seed Good cold soil vigor Uses University of Florida I gene 3

11/23/2016 XDH20173 76 Day High Quality Sh2 BiColor, IFSI American Dream Aces 79 Day High Quality Sh2 BiColor, Abbot & Cobb 77 day super sweet bi color Excellent eating quality Attractive husk Good yield potential Northern Corn Leaf Blight In both 2015 and 2016 Northern Corn Leaf Blight was severe. Northern Corn Leaf Blight reduces ear size, yield and husk appearance. Obsession and EX 7143 showed good tolerance to the disease. Aces, Anthem, 274A are very susceptible. BSS 0761 Attribute 1 BSS 0982 +MIR162 Does NOT have glyphosate tolerance Superior insect protection 82 Day super sweet bicolor 4

11/23/2016 Untreated BSS 0761 vs Anthem 2 September 8, 2016 Anthem 2 Anthem 2 Untreated, September 8, 2016 There were numerous complaints regarding insect damage With all of those complaints, growers were using pyrethroids for insect protection There was not one complaint from growers using Coragen or Belt BSS 0761 Anthem 2 SV9012SD 83 Day High Quality Sh2 Yellow, Seminis Performance Series SV1580SC 79 Day High Quality Sh2 White, Seminis SV9813SC 79 Day High Quality Sh2 White, Seminis Performance Series Derrill Kregel Rispens Seeds PO Box 310 Beecher, IL 60401 888 874 0241 5