Colorado Wine Industry Development Board Update, with hints of mountains, sunshine and blue sky

Similar documents
Colorado Wine Board Quantitative Wine User Research II. Final Report ~ August 21, 2015

Colorado Wine Board Quantitative Wine User Research. Final Report ~ May 24, 2017

Oregon Wine Board Consumer Study. December 18, 2015

The Economic Contribution of the Colorado Wine Industry

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Grape Growers of Ontario Developing key measures to critically look at the grape and wine industry

Results from the First North Carolina Wine Industry Tracker Survey

Awareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary

DISTILLERY REPORT. Prepared for Colorado Distillers Guild

Sample. TO: Prof. Hussain FROM: GROUP (Names of group members) DATE: October 09, 2003 RE: Final Project Proposal for Group Project

2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA

MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME. Term-End Examination June, MS-68 : MANAGEMENT OF MARKETING COMMUNICATION AND ADVERTISING (L)

Supply & Demand for Lake County Wine Grapes. Christian Miller Lake County MOMENTUM April 13, 2015

Work Sample (Minimum) for 10-K Integration Assignment MAN and for suppliers of raw materials and services that the Company relies on.

Marketing Program Update. Mike Rowan & Duff Bevill Marketing Committee Co-Chairs January 20, 2011

Lake County in the Marketplace. Christian Miller Lake County Winegrape Commission Momentum Seminar January 23, 2014

Washington Wine Commission: Wine industry grows its research commitment

Table of Contents. Contact Information

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

STATE OF THE INDUSTRY 2017 wine sales trends & a deep dive into the Oregon Wine Consumer. Christian Miller Proprietor, Full Glass Research

Running Head: MESSAGE ON A BOTTLE: THE WINE LABEL S INFLUENCE p. 1. Message on a bottle: the wine label s influence. Stephanie Marchant

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

Informing Wineries Tourism Decisions: Studies of Tasting Room Visitors and Wine Tourism Collaboration

Bag In Box Consumer Preferences in the UK. Presented during the Performance BIB meetings in Bristol, England 24 & 25 October 2012

U.S. Hispanics and their Purchase, Consumption and Brand Preferences with regard to Avocados

Wine Writers Symposium. Meadowood, February 19, 2014

PRE- SUBMISSION DEADLINE RESPONSE TO AGENTS. March 29, 2013

WINE OPINIONS PANEL CONSUMER RESEARCH SURVEY RESULTS

BREWERS ASSOCIATION CRAFT BREWER DEFINITION UPDATE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. December 18, 2018

NO TO ARTIFICIAL, YES TO FLAVOR: A LOOK AT CLEAN BALANCERS

Re: LCBO Lightweight Glass Wine Standard Implementation Date

OUR MARKET RESEARCH SOLUTIONS HELP TO:

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Executive Summary. N.C. Customers Give Their Local ABC Liquor Stores High Marks, Identify Ways to Improve Customer Service.

2017 Food Attitudes & Behaviors

MANGO PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK REPORT

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

The China Wine Barometer (CWB): a look into the future

UK Berry Market. Dr Drew Reynolds Total Produce

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

A Profile of the Generation X Wine Consumer in California

Moving Forward Together. Kathy Cannon Director, Vintages

The University of Georgia

Napa Valley Vintners Teaching Winery Napa Valley College Marketing and Sales Plan February 14, 2018

YAKIMA VALLEY TOURISM ANNUAL REPORT

Colorado Governor s Cup


A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

Yellow Tail Media Plan. Jacob Como and Greg Schillinger. Jour 495. April, 26, 2016

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Perceptions of Privatization

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Conjunctive Labeling: What and Why? Mendocino County Conjunctive Labeling Educational Forum November 29, 2018

ALCOHOL & CONSUMER DRINKING TRENDS MARCH 2017

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Padthaway Grape Growers Association

Smart Meal Seal NCSL Shana Patterson, RD Nutrition Coordinator Colorado Physical Activity and Nutrition (COPAN) program

The changing face of the U.S. consumer: How shifting demographics are re-shaping the U.S. consumer market for wine

A CASE STUDY: HOW CONSUMER INSIGHTS DROVE THE SUCCESSFUL LAUNCH OF A NEW RED WINE

Wine Australia Wine.com Data Report. July 21, 2017

Bottling Wine and Spirits in a Changing Climate. 17 May 2011

Global Perspectives Grant Program

18 May Primary Production Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington

Virginia Wine Board Marketing Presentation. Omni Hotel Charlottesville, VA November 7, 2016

VINITRAC GLOBAL REPORTING EXAMPLES 2015

McDonald s Marketing Mix

Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement (CETA)

Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute College of Human Sciences Texas Tech University CONSUMER ATTITUDES TO TEXAS WINES

Clare McDermott, Business Development Director

Driving ROI from Events. Workshop Session January 23, :00 12:00

Update : Consumer Attitudes

CONJOINT RESEARCH FOR CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF WINE CLOSURE OPTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON PURCHASE INTEREST IN THE UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

Discover the World. February 7, To: All Trade Councils

Private Equity Investments

Starbucks / Dunkin Donuts research. Presented by Alex Hockley and Molly Fox. Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Comparison of FY15 and FY16 Foodservice Program Budgets

Réseau Vinicole Européen R&D d'excellence

Team Harvard Ecureuils Harvard University

HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

74% of consumers say they prefer to eat their breakfast in the lodging foodservice facility, as opposed to taking it to go

Certified Coffees, current market and a vision into the future.

SPIRITS PRODUCT NEEDS

Louisiana Crawfish Action Plan

Customer Survey Summary of Results March 2015

The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011

west australian wine industry sustainable funding model

KENWOOD. October 2015

Introduction to Workshop (Eric Stafne, Assistant Professor and Fruit Crops Specialist)

An Annual Report by ShipCompliant and Wines & Vines. Direct to consumer. Wine Shipping Report

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Drinks Sector Guide. The global alcoholic drinks market grew by 3.3% in 2014 to reach a value of $1,152,011.1 million.

MyPlate The New Generation Food Icon

COMMITTEE ON COMMODITY PROBLEMS INTERGOVERNMENTAL GROUP ON TEA NINETEENTH SESSION. New Delhi, India, May 2010

Fish and Chips in Commercial Foodservice 2016 JULIA BROOKS, JANUARY 2017

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

The cost of entry is $40 per entry for PWA dues paying members and $50 for nonmembers. If you

Starbucks BRAZIL. Presentation Outline

Pecans. The Consumer Speaks A consumer A&U study on Pecans 9/09/11

Transcription:

Colorado Wine Industry Development Board Update, with hints of mountains, sunshine and blue sky CWIDB Update, VinCO, 20 January 2016 Doug Caskey, executive director CO Wine Industry Development Board

Dr. Gerald Ivancie, Colorado Wine Pioneer Started Ivancie Wines, Colorado s 1 st modern winery, in his Denver basement in 1968 Hired Warren Winiarski as winemaker Passed away on January 1, 2016 surrounded by his family

CWIDB s Strategic Goals A work in progress: based on 1 st planning session, Nov. 8-9 in Broomfield with JT Trierweiler from MI Economic and Business Development Increase sales of all Colorado wines Attract outside investment Quality Increase perceived value and balance of quality to value ratio Reboot Quality Initiative Marketing Increase market share by $ to 10% using existing measures Research Provide tools to enable growers/wineries to prosper in a high desert environment Effectively communicate the result and applications of research to every winery and grower

CWIDB Consumer Survey: August 2015 analysis from Barbara Gasper, Focus Research & Strategy Comparison to 2014 survey but with significant variation in sample make-up 2015: 46% males 2014: 22% males 2015: 80% of respondents consume wine weekly or more 2014: 43% No baseline established as yet 2015 - Frequency of Wine Consumption (Total sample - n=513) 2014 - Frequency of Wine Consumption (Total sample; n=1315) 16% 2% 2% 15% Daily More than once a week but not every day Once a week 26% 8% 22% Daily More than once a week Once a week 21% 44% 2-3 times per month Once a month 11% 14% 2-3 times per month Once a month Special occasions or holidays only 19% Special occasions, holidays only

CWIDB Consumer Survey: Increase in willingness to spend per 750ml represents different consumer segment, not a trend $15 or more: 37% in 2015; 21% in 2014 $9-15: 51% in 2015; 67% in 2014 2015 - % People spending $ on bottle of wine (n=513) 2014 - % People spending $ on bottle of wine (n=1315) 4% 1% 2% 9% 12% Less than $9.00 per bottle $9.00 to $11.99 per bottle 5% 0% 12% > $9/bottle 23% 22% $12 to $14.99 per bottle $15 to $19.99 per bottle 14% $9-$11.99 $12-$14.99 $20 to $24.99 per bottle $25 to $39.99 per bottle 33% $15-$19.99 $20-$24.99 29% More than $40 per bottle 34% $25-$39.99 $40+/bottle (0%)

Awareness of CO wine production high: 86% of wine drinkers know wine is produced in Colorado; slightly up from 2014 84%. Same familiarity rate as for CO Proud in 2015 95+% know wine is produced in California, Italy and France On an open ended basis, Napa/California, Spain, Colorado, Australia come to mind. Where heard of wine produced (aided) (Total Sample) Areas come to mind open end Word Cloud most mentioned in larger text 2015 2014 California Italy France Colorado Spain Argentina 61% 98% 98% 96% 94% 95% 94% 86% 84% 86% 78% 74% Washington 54% 65% Oregon 62% 53% Q. 9 What geographic areas come to mind when thinking about where wine is produced? Write in. Q. 10 From which of the following geographic areas have you ever heard of wine being produced? Other (23%) open ends

CWIDB Consumer Survey: 25% have never consumed CO wine 26% in 2014 3% have never consumed CA wine 17% have never purchased (vs. consumed) CO wines Wine Consumed by Region (N=513) 2015 2014 California Italy France Colorado Spain Argentina Washington Oregon 73% 72% 75% 74% 67% 53% 59% 42% 45% 40% 42% 37% 97% 93% 85% 83%

CWIDB Consumer Survey: Future purchase interest for CO wine vs. CA remains low. There is a gap to fill. CO: 52% (top 2 answers: definitely or probably will buy) CA: 87% Among 21-35 year old consumers Consumption and awareness of CO wines lower in this group They are more interested in wine tasting events and visiting local wineries 36% say they would definitely buy CO wine

Impressions of quality by region: Impressions among 2015 wine drinkers of European and California wines is high above 4.00 mean. Similar to 2014. Colorado quality impression is average 3.37 mean. European wines 2015 - Quality of Wine Impression (Mean score - 5 pt. scale) 4.35 2014 4.28 California wines 4.16 4.15 Colorado wines 3.37 3.52 In 2015, most believe wine quality is staying about the same.. Colorado wine is viewed by more people as somewhat improving in quality. Very few believe any wines are declining in quality. Changes in quality Among total wine drinkers (n=513) Quality significantly declining Quality somewhat declining Quality staying about the same Quality somewhat improving Quality significantly improving N/A European wine - 2015 Californian wine - 2015 Colorado wine - 2015 0% 4% 71% 19% 6% 0% 4% 54% 30% 12% 0% 1% 41% 46% 12% - - - Colorado wine - 2014 0% 1% 19% 27% 14% 39% Q. 18 Select the statement that best describes your opinion and impression regarding the quality of wines from each of the following geographic areas. Check one in each row. If you have never tried wine from a particular region or have no opinion, please select N/A. Q. 19 Select the statement that best describes your opinion and impression of the change in quality of wines over time from each of the following geographic areas. Check one in each row. If you have never tried wine from a particular region or have no opinion, please select N/A.

Value & price expectation by region: 57% of 2015 wine drinkers believe European wine is somewhat or significantly over priced. Also high in 2014 48%. 64% believe Colorado wine is fairly priced in 2015 vs. 45% in 2014 among less frequent wine drinkers. Total wine drinkers (n=513) Value Extremely underpriced Somewhat underpriced Fairly priced Somewhat overpriced Extremely overpriced N/A European wine Californian wine 0% 1% 42% 45% 12% 0% 1% 68% 26% 5% - - Colorado wine 2015 0% 2% 64% 29% 4% - Colorado wine 2014 1% 2% 45% 17% 3% 33% Pricing of Colorado wine in 2015 is $15 - $19.99 among a higher percent of frequent wine drinkers 30% vs. less frequent wine drinkers in 2014 20%. As in 2014, European wines are expected to cost more; $15-$25 per bottle, by most people in 2015. Total wine drinkers (n=513) Expect to Pay Less than $9 per bottle $9 - $11.99 per bottle $12 - $14.99 per bottle $15 - $19.99 per bottle $20 - $24.99 per bottle $25 - $39.99 per bottle $40 or more per bottle European wine 1% 11% 21% 33% 21% 9% 4% California wine 6% 24% 29% 24% 11% 6% 1% Colorado wine 2015 5% 20% 31% 30% 13% 2% 0% Colorado wine 2014 5% 17% 25% 20% 6% 1% 0% Q. 20 Select the statement that best describes your opinion and impression regarding the pricing for the quality of wines from each of the following geographic areas. Check one in each row. Q. 21 What do you expect to spend at a wine shop or liquor store for a typical bottle (750 ml) of wine from each of the following geographic areas? Think about the average price for each region. Check one in each row.

Opinions of Colorado wines: Supporting local growers is something 2015 wine drinkers want to do. They are also interested in visiting local wineries & wine tasting events, but 36% have never visited a winery. 2015 drinkers also believe that locally grown restaurants should feature Colorado grown wine. In terms of percent of total wine purchases, Colorado wine is less than 10% of their total for 57% of 2015 wine drinkers. Among total wine drinkers (n=513) Mean (5 pt scale) I like to buy Colorado and support local growers 4.00 I am interested in visiting Colorado wineries 3.97 Restaurants that feature locally grown food should also 3.96 I am interested in Colorado wine tasting events 3.81 Craftsmanship is apparent in Colorado wines 3.35 Grapes in Colorado are exposed to cooler nights and hotter days which leads to better wines 3.31 It s hard to find Colorado wines in liquor stores 3.12 Colorado wines are fresher than other wines 2.98 I don t think about Colorado wines as local. 2.24 Percent of total Wine purchases More than 50% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 2% 25% to 49% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 6% 10% to 24% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 7% 10% to 19% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 9% 1% to 9% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 28% Less than 1% of my wine purchases are Colorado wine 29% I do not purchase Colorado wine 19% Visted Co. Winery Yes, many times, all across the state 11% Yes, but only on the Western Slope (Palisade, Grand Junction, Paonia, Cortez, etc.) 25% Yes, but only on the Front Range (Denver, Boulder, Loveland, Colorado Springs, etc.) 22% Yes, but only in the mountains (Woodland Park, Glenwood Springs, Salida, Cañon City, etc.) 12% No. I have never visited a Colorado Winery or tasting room. 36% Q. 26 What are your opinions and impressions of Colorado wines?

Recommendations from Focus R&S 12 Fill the gap between aware of Co wine and future PI of Colorado wine. Give them reasons to try CO wine what are it s benefits vs. California and European wine? Improve quality perceptions of Co wine - more in line with California and European wines: Impressions of CO wine quality are lower vs. California & Europe. With most believing quality is staying the same Messaging around quality may gain some traction in the future. Wine awards, honors, taste reviews in magazines may help. Give them reasons to pay more for Colorado wines. Colorado wines are currently seen as somewhat overpriced by 29% - this, combined with lower quality perceptions are likely strong barriers to purchase vs. other options from California. Improve quality cues for Colorado wines vs. California wines Locally grown and Colorado sourced are good messages, but perhaps wine drinkers are not getting quality benefits from these local messages. Target younger 21-35 wine drinkers Granted, they tend to drink less wine (likely due to ciders, mixed spirits, beer and other options) but they are most interested in the locally grown story and visiting wineries and tasting local wines. Their future purchase interest is strong.

Recommendations from Focus R&S 13 Continue local advertising messages and add in quality communication points. Ads in this test made over 1/3 of respondents interested in buying CO wine. Help consumers bridge the quality gap: why does locally grown lead to higher quality?

CWIDB Consumer Survey: Any questions or comments?

A Bit of Colorado Wine History. Want More? Warren Winiarski, the UC Davis grad who served as the winemaker for Denver s Ivancie Winery in the 1960s, shown in 1970 planting Stag's Leap Vineyard in Napa Valley Photo courtesy Stag's Leap Wine Cellars Joseph Phelps planted grapes in Greeley and made wine in his basement Ray Duncan s family (Silver Oak) had a wine blending sales room in the Larimer Square area

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project: A New Approach to Blending CO Wines and Consumer Response $29,000 USDA SCBG funds and $24,000 match CAVE in-kind: $700 CWIDB in-kind (staff time): $10,400 CSU in-kind (waived indirect costs): $2,300 CWIDB cash (coupons, etc.): $10,600 Two work segments Consumer survey of flavor preferences and willingness to pay for familiar vs. unfamiliar grape varieties, CO vs. CA Marketing consultation on new products made with cold-tolerant varieties or blends

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Consumer survey results Overall Taste rating is the strongest determinant of respondent willingness to pay The overall taste of the wine must be appealing to consumers in for them to be willing to pay more All wines must be made with quality and care Willingness to pay varies significantly by location Respondents willing to pay the most overall for Colorado wine at Winefest, where they have an obvious preference for CO wines This suggests that wine festivals, or similar venues, may be the most appropriate place to introduce or test new or unfamiliar varieties, as consumers are more inclined to pay more Nevertheless, the vast majority of wine is sold in liquor stores where the ability to capture consumer interest is the most important and impactful overall

Overall taste rating (1=low, 5=high) Note: Only includes red wine drinkers 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 In store and Winefest setting, overall taste rating by known/unknown varietal 3.46 3.47 Overall 3.45 taste rating is 3.34 the single biggest 3.24 predictor of willingness 3.14 to pay! Colorado wine 3 Colorado known varietal 2.9 Store (mean) Winefest (mean) Colorado unknown varietal

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Consumer survey results, cont d In liquor store settings: Data seems to indicate respondents felt California was more proficient at producing familiar vinifera varieties And respondents were more comfortable with the familiar flavors of known grapes from a familiar location, CA over CO However, some segment of respondents were generally willing to pay more made from Colorado wines with unknown varietals

$15.00 WTP-high $14.00 $13.00 Willingness to pay here and now by region and known/unknown varietal WTP-low $12.92 $14.26 $12.83 $12.99 245 consumers surveyed in store $12.00 $11.00 $10.00 $9.00 $8.00 $8.35 $9.29 $8.51 CO wine CA wine CO known varietal $8.24 CO unknown or hybrid varietal No stigma associated with hybrid or unknown grape varietals! Note: Only includes red wine drinkers, customers who came to the store to purchase wine, and those with a low willingness to pay >0

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Consumer survey results, cont d Respondents who did not know whether they were tasting a familiar or unfamiliar variety of grape from Colorado were willing to pay more for the unknown variety Respondents who did know the variety of grape they were tasting from Colorado were willing to pay the same for the unfamiliar grape variety as they were for the known grape variety. Meaning: At the very least, no penalty or stigma for unfamiliar grapes Perhaps consumers are more open to trying something out of the ordinary from a less familiar location, i.e. Colorado.

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Consumer survey results, cont d This is a unique opportunity for the CO wine industry as it diversifies the varieties of grapes grown in the state: Consumers do not bring the same prejudice against unfamiliar grape varieties to wines from an unfamiliar region as they do to unfamiliar grapes from a familiar region: If I am buying a CA wine, I don t want something unfamiliar. But if the consumer is unfamiliar with Marquette or Frontenac, they may well be more likely to try a new grape or style of wine from Colorado than they would the same kind of wine from California: As long as I don t know what to expect from CO, I might as well try something unusual.

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project What if we have been marketing CO wines the wrong way around for the past 25 years? At the very least, the consumer seems to bring fewer pre-conceptions and expectations to an unfamiliar region. That may translate to a greater openness if not an outright inclination to try a less familiar variety of wine from an unfamiliar region (Colorado) than a familiar variety from that same region Colorado Cabernets will always be judged against the consumer s expectations for California Cabernets, just as California was judged against Bordeaux

CWIDB Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Marketing Consultations It may actually be advantageous to identify unfamiliar varieties Consumers will approach an unfamiliar wine variety from an unfamiliar region with fewer expectations as they will a familiar variety Put educational information about the unfamiliar variety on the label: ancestry, flavor profile, etc. Embrace don t shy away from the unknown Introducing products made from or with unfamiliar grape varieties create an opportunity to employ new marketing and branding strategies Packaging, such as box wines, wine in a bag, etc. Style, such as sparkling or rosé Branding, such as premium or economy proprietary blends

Other CWIDB Projects Quality Program(s) Renewal of Quality recognition program incorporating a quality management training system Begin exploration of implementing a CO Quality Assurance voluntary certification program based on the Seal of Quality statute, CRS 35-29 Possible Sensory Quality Evaluation panel costshared and in collaboration with NE and NM wine industries Anyone interested in serving on the CWIDB Quality Committee, please contact Doug Caskey or Billie Witham, Two Rivers Winery

Other CWIDB Projects Marketing projects with Cultivator Ad & Design and VOCA PR Redesign of coloradowine.com launched in June 2015 Corresponding with billboards in June-August 2015 3 in Denver area, 1 in GJ, 1 on CO Springs On-line digital ads targeted to Colorado wine consumers Billboards repeated in Denver and CO Springs Thanksgiving to mid-december Coupled with DIA train station domination in Concourse B & C All to be repeated in 2016 Additional 2016 projects: Redesign and reprint of CO Wine map/brochure Media FAM trip Governor s Cup Case promo event Judging July 15-17, 2016 See the slideshow in the hallway for more information

Other CWIDB Projects Is your winery listing up to date on www.coloradowine.com? Post winery events, too. If you need log on help, call: Doug, 303.869.9177 Kyle, 303.869.9178 Claire, 303.444.4134

Other CWIDB Projects Give us your input for FY 2017 CO Wine Research Projects. www.surveymonkey.com/r/ 2015_COWine_Research CWIDB Quality Committee Chairs: Jay Christianson, Canyon Wine Cellars, 970.464.0888 Michelle Cleveland, Creekside Cellars, 303.674.5460 Or call Doug Caskey, 303.869.9177

Other CWIDB Projects CO Alcohol Beverage Symposium, Aug. 2-3 (9-10) Business, compliance and regulatory tracks Denver metro area, all tiers and sectors

Other CWIDB Projects Legislative Committee CAVE and CWIDB/CDA collaborating on legislation to allow limited wineries to personally deliver to consumers without using a common carrier, as currently required in CRS 12-47-403 Any objections to allowing appointed CWIDB members to serve multiple terms? November 2016 ballot initiative to allow for sales of wine and full strength beer in grocery and convenience stores CAVE is a member of keepcolocal.com CWIDB statement: The Colorado Wine Industry Development Board hopes any potential legislative changes to Colorado s liquor law will foster the continued growth and long-term success of licensed Colorado wineries, breweries, and distilleries. Colorado's alcohol beverage producers provide agricultural diversity, economic benefits, and of course merriment to the state and embracing the importance of these local producers is necessary for the continued success of the industry as a whole.

Thank you Doug Caskey, exec. director CO Wine Industry Development Board c/o CO Dept. of Ag 305 Interlocken Pkwy Broomfield, CO 80021 303.869.9177 doug.caskey@state.co.us www.coloradowine.com