EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

Similar documents
EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Aug (Dry Bean 2012 PRE) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 9 USDA - ARS. Broad Axe Trial on Pinto Bean General Trial Information

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide.

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

1

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Stone Fruit Protection Solutions

Strawberry Variety Trial

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Report of Progress 961

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

Walnut Blight Control Investigations 2004 (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis)

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Early Post Emergence Efficacy

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Materials and Methods

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

2013 Sunflower Variety Trial

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases

ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH

Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

Berry Group Protection Solutions

Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators

2014 Sunflower Variety Trial

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Report of Progress 945

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

Soybean Production State Extension Conference

Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluations of Tri-State Varieties. RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018

Sharpen up your pulses harvest result. Increase harvest efficiency and the value of the crop

K. S. Lawrence, J. Luangkhot, C.J Land, K. M. Glass, C.H. Burmester

Recalibration for Sunflower

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials

Transcription:

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

Table of Contents Acknowledgements. 3 Chemtura and Norac Fusarium Seed Treatment 4 Chemtura and Norac Rhizoctonia Seed Treatment 5 Head-to-Head Anthracnose Seed Treatment.. 6 Syngenta Foliar Anthracnose (cv. Kippen) 7 Syngenta Foliar Anthracnose (cv. OAC Rex) 8 Syngenta Seed Treatment Anthracnose (cv. Kippen). 9 Syngenta Seed Treatment Anthracnose (cv. OAC Rex). 10 Chemtura/Norac Seed Trt Anthracnose., 11 Anthracnose Mechanical Dispersal 12 Bacterial Blight Seed Treatment (1 st Planting) 13 Bacterial Blight Seed Treatment (2 nd Planting). 14 Head-to-Head White Mold Foliar Fungicide (1 st Planting) 15 Head-to-Head White Mold Foliar Fungicide ((2 nd Planting). 16 Desiccation Glyphosate Tank Mix 17 Nitrogen Response in White Beans.. 18 Nitrogen Response in Cranberry Beans... 19 Nitrogen Response in Kidney Beans.... 20 Kippen Dry Bean Variety Summaries Major Coloured Bean Registration and Performance 21 Cran and Kidney Preliminary Yield.. 22 White Bean Registration and Performance... 23 White Bean Preliminary Yield.. 24 Black and Misc. Preliminary Yield... 25 Pinto Preliminary Yield 26 Blyth Dry Bean Variety Summaries White Bean Registration and Performance... 27 White Bean Preliminary Yield.. 28 Black and Misc. Preliminary Yield... 29 Thorndale Dry Bean Variety Summaries Major Coloured Bean Registration and Performance... 30 Cran and Kidney Preliminary Yield. 31 Strip Trial Dry Bean Variety Summaries Donnelly Sand vs Loam 32 Martin Cranberry.. 34 Willis White. 35 Dry Bean Variety Visual Quality Summaries Black Bean 36 Cranberry Bean. 37 White Bean 38 Dark Red Kidney Bean. 39 Light Red Kidney Bean 40 Top Picks in Dry Bean Varieties.. 41 Quadris/Headline for Plant Health 42 Marsh Spot Summary for Registration/Performance Trials. 47 Marsh Spot Summary for Preliminary Yield Trials. 52

Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results for Dry Edible Beans 2009 This report is a compilation of agronomy and pest management research results in dry edible beans at Ridgetown College and the Huron Research Station for 2008. It has been produced as a reference for growers and industry personnel. A number of the pesticides that are included in this report are not currently registered for use in dry edible beans in Ontario. Always follow label directions when applying pesticides. Acknowledgments Funding for this research was received from: Agricultural Adaptation Council Ontario Coloured Bean Growers Assoc. BASF Canada Bayer Crop Protection Norac Concepts UAP Canada NuFarm Canada Syngenta Crop Protection Ontario White Bean Producers Dupont Canada Chemtura OMAFRA The Bean Team Steve Willis Chris Gillard Don Depuydt Student Assistance by: Laura McKenzie Justine Vanesbroeck Brent Schuster Malora Mackey Elise Stacey Broad Copyright by University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus Ridgetown Ontario Canada N0P 2C0 Telephone: (519) 674-1632 Facimile (519)674-1600 Email:cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca 3

Chemtura&Norac Fusarium Seed Treatment Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Primary Root Primary Root Average Basal Plant Dry Yield 100 Seed Pick Seed Quality $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) External Internal & Tap Root Weight lbs/ac. Weight % 1-5 (1=best) per acre Rating Date 6/15/2009 6/22/2009 6/29/2009 6/29/2009 8/01/2009 1-5 (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 7/20/2009 Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 V8-R2 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 g./plant Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Unin.Check 80 a 95 98 a 2.5 1.8 c 1.0 1.5 2.4 c 37.0 2550 23.8 0.33 1.3 632.4 2 Apron Maxx RTA 67 bc 96 99 a 2.5 2.1 bc 1.2 1.9 2.8 bc 33.7 2413 24.9 0.77 1.1 594.3 3 Rancona Summit 74 ab 101 102 a 2.3 2.6 ab 1.6 2.2 3.6 ab 29.1 2529 24.2 0.27 1.1 628.9 4 Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 72 b 97 104 a 2.8 3.0 a 1.9 2.1 3.9 a 28.9 2368 24.6 0.49 1.1 586.8 5 Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 74 ab 105 104 a 2.0 1.8 c 1.4 1.8 2.5 c 36.3 2475 24.1 1.24 1.4 603.7 6 Untreated Inoc.Check 62 c 93 91 b 2.8 2.3 abc 2.1 2.6 3.6 ab 32.4 2709 24.7 0.65 1.5 668.3 LSD (P=.05) 8 n/a 7 n/a 0.8 n/a n/a 0.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a CV 7.0 6.1 4.8 14.1 24.5 29.3 37.3 18.7 18.3 7.1 3.5 102.2 15.6 7.6 Grand Mean 71 98 100 2.5 2.3 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.04 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) 2.0 1.5 0.16 0.12 Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 20 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sept 19 3.1 0.01 32.9 2507 24.4 0.6 0.31 0.18 0.48 0.34 1.3 0.07 619.07 0.21 4

Chemtura&Norac Rhizoctonia Seed Treatment Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Primary Root Primary Root Plant Dry Yield 100 Seed Pick Seed Quality $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) External Internal Weight lbs/ac. Weight % 1-5 (1=best) Rating Date 6/15/2009 6/22/2009 6/29/2009 6/29/2009 8/01/2009 1-5 (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 7/20/2009 Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 V8-R2 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 g./plant Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Unin.Check 83 a 96 a 98 a 2.8 bc 1.3 c 1.2 c 1.1 b 14.9 2097 23.4 5.4 2.4 a 461.63 2 Apron Maxx RTA 57 c 90 ab 95 ab 3 bc 2.6 b 1.4 c 1.3 b 15.5 2181 24.7 4.3 1.0 b 498.16 3 Rancona Summit 68 b 95 a 101 a 2.3 c 1.6 c 1.5 c 1.4 b 13.5 2283 24.6 3.5 1.0 b 530.54 4 Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 42 d 81 b 87 b 2.8 bc 2.5 b 2.2 b 2.2 a 11.8 2137 25.5 5.0 1.8 ab 481.72 5 Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 46 d 85 b 87 b 3.3 b 2.8 b 1.4 c 1.4 b 12.0 2146 23.9 3.5 1.9 a 497.82 6 Untreated Inoc.Check 11 e 57 c 68 c 4.3 a 3.6 a 2.9 a 2.5 a 11.3 2062 25.6 8.5 2.1 a 427.45 LSD (P=.05) 11 10 10 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.86 n/a CV 14.4 7.6 7.7 20.7 21.9 25.0 22.2 16.4 13.0 5.1 72.2 33.8 12.5 Grand Mean 51 84 89 3.0 2.4 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) 1.7 1.6 0.00 0.00 13.1 2151 24.6 5.0 0.07 0.91 0.16 0.42 Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 20 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: m 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sept 19 1.7 0.02 482.89 0.29 5

Head to Head Anthracnose Seed Treatment Trial Lesions Observations 0-100 Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 3 WAP 3 WAP 10.5 WAP 10.5 WAP 13 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAFE Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 94 a 3.0 5.5 0.3 8.1 a 1477 cd 22.8 2.6 ab 1.2 6.3 318.12 bc 2 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 105 a 2.0 1.0 0.5 3.8 abc 1648 abc 22.5 1.6 c 1.2 4.7 369.62 ab 51.50 DCT (Standard) 197.6 G A/100 KG 3 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 92 a 3.0 0.8 0.3 1.9 bc 1760 ab 22.2 1.5 c 1.1 2.7 411.24 a 93.12 ApronMaxx ST 6.25 G A/100 KG Dynasty ST (Standard) 1 G A/100 KG 4 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 105 a 3.0 4.2 0.7 2.4 bc 1600 bc 21.9 1.9 bc 1.2 5.2 356.56 ab 38.44 ApronMaxx ST 6.25 G A/100 KG Dynasty ST (High) 2 G A/100 KG 5 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 101 a 3.0 8.1 1.3 6.7 ab 1330 d 22.2 2.9 a 1.3 7.2 282.09 c -36.03 Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 6 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 107 a 3.0 0.5 0.1 0.9 c 1789 a 22.5 1.3 c 1.1 3.3 412.96 a 94.84 Rancona Summit G A/100 KG NCF (TPM) (Half) 3.08 G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.9 183 n/a 1.0 n/a n/a 71.17 CV 13.8 20.3 113.7 121.4 82.1 7.6 4.4 32.2 16.6 58.7 13.2 Grand Mean 101.0 2.8 3.3 0.5 4.0 1601 22.3 2.0 1.2 4.9 358.43 Treatment Prob(F) 0.53 0.20 0.06 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.85 0.01 0.74 0.29 0.01 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) 0-100 Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (g) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 6

Observations 0-100 0-100 Syngenta Foliar Kippen Anthracnose Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality Veins Infected Pods Infected Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 11 WAP 11 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAAE Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Untreated Check 7.6 a 6.0 ab 67.0 a 20.8 a 35.2 a 575 d 19.9 b 4.1 ab 27.1 3.9 55.25 d 2 Quadris 125 G A/HA 2.0 b 1.0 c 4.8 c 6.0 c 9.5 c 1139 b 21.8 a 3.4 bc 19.1 4.6 116.70 bcd 61.45 3 A7402 (Inspire)(Low) 39 G A/HA 5.8 a 7.3 a 26.4 b 17.8 a 23.3 b 850 c 20.3 b 4.0 ab 17.6 4.5 82.29 cd 27.04 4 A7402 (Inspire)(High) 78 G A/HA 3.0 b 4.0 abc 18.2 b 13.6 b 18.9 b 854 c 20.3 b 4.3 a 22.2 4.3 78.10 cd 22.85 5 Quadris Top 203 G A/HA 1.5 b 1.0 c 3.3 c 2.7 cd 9.7 c 1281 b 21.9 a 3.4 bc 16.6 4.3 134.56 bc 79.31 6 Quadris 125 G A/HA 1.3 b 1.9 bc 0.3 c 1.0 d 5.4 cd 1249 b 22.1 a 3.8 ab 12.0 3.9 155.47 b 100.22 Turbocharge (High) 7 Quadris 125 G A/HA 0.6 b 0.5 c 0.6 c 1.1 d 2.0 cd 1202 b 22.3 a 2.9 cd 11.4 3.3 174.22 ab 118.97 Turbocharge (Very High) 8 Headline 100 G A/HA 0.6 b 0.5 c 0.5 c 1.1 d 1.5 d 1518 a 22.4 a 2.4 d 16.2 2.5 234.32 a 179.07 LSD (P=.05) 2.6 4.2 11.4 4.2 7.9 194 1.3 0.9 n/a n/a 67.21 CV 64.1 102.5 51.4 35.4 40.5 12.2 4.2 16.8 37.6 31.3 35.5 Grand Mean 2.8 2.8 15.1 8.0 13.2 1083 21.4 3.5 17.8 3.9 128.86 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.28 0.00 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) 0-100 Additional Value ($ per acre) Footnotes Trial Summary (d) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi (e) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post (f) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Treatments were applied twice due to the heavy anthracnose pressure (Aug 6, Aug 21) All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (2g.ai) applied to them to reduce better reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. 7

Observations 0-100 0-100 Syngenta Foliar OAC REX Anthracnose Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality Veins Infected Pods Infected Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 11 WAP 11 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Untreated Check 4.0 1.0 31.3 a 10.6 a 23.1 a 1383 d 22.4 bc 2.9 a 5.5 ab 11.4 a 251.67 d 2 Quadris 125 G A/HA 0.2 0.1 1.5 bc 0.8 bc 2.7 bc 2230 ab 23.7 ab 1.3 c 3.8 a-d 3.0 cd 504.65 a 252.98 3 A7402 (Inspire)(Low) 39 G A/HA 4.1 1.7 18.0 ab 5.5 b 7.8 b 1778 c 22.2 c 2.6 ab 5.3 abc 6.5 bcd 371.22 bc 119.55 4 A7402 (Inspire)(High) 78 G A/HA 3.7 1.7 16.9 abc 4.4 bc 17.9 a 1632 cd 22.0 c 2.5 ab 5.9 a 8.4 ab 321.44 cd 69.77 5 Quadris Top 203 G A/HA 0.6 0.1 0.6 bc 0.6 c 0.8 c 2138 ab 23.9 a 1.9 bc 3.8 a-d 7.6 abc 436.20 ab 184.53 6 Quadris 125 G A/HA 0.4 0.0 0.3 bc 0.3 c 0.4 c 2232 a 24.5 a 1.4 c 1.8 d 3.1 cd 512.30 a 260.63 Turbocharge (High) 7 Quadris 125 G A/HA 2.1 0.1 0.6 bc 0.6 c 1.8 bc 1916 bc 24.0 a 1.6 c 2.7 cd 4.1 bcd 427.18 ab 175.51 Turbocharge (Very High) 8 Headline 100 G A/HA 0.2 0.0 0.3 c 0.2 c 0.4 c 2218 ab 24.3 a 1.1 c 3.0 bcd 2.8 d 509.52 a 257.85 LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a 17.8 4.8 6.3 315 1.4 0.8 2.7 4.6 93.06 CV 128.2 186.7 139.3 114.3 62.8 11.0 4.0 28.6 46.1 53.9 15.2 Grand Mean 1.9 0.6 8.7 2.9 6.9 1941 23.4 1.9 4.0 5.9 416.77 Treatment Prob(F) 0.09 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.00 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Trial ID: 09DPABE Dockage (f) Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 0-100 $ per acre Additional Value ($ per acre) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Treatments were applied twice due to the heavy anthracnose pressure (Aug 6, Aug 21) All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (2g.ai) applied to them to reduce better reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. 8

Syngenta Seed Treatment Kippen Anthracnose ONLY 3 REPS Observations 0-100 Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPACE Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check 83 3.5 0.5 bc 0.1 b 3.0 1611 22.3 1.7 bc 1.7 6.5 345.31 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 2 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 98 2.8 0.8 bc 0.5 b 3.0 1779 22.9 1.7 bc 1.4 6.9 378.28 32.97 3 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 94 3.0 1.4 bc 0.5 b 2.0 1707 22.6 1.2 cd 1.3 4.4 383.53 38.22 Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 4 Mertect 7.5 G A/100 KG 89 3.0 0.8 bc 0.1 b 1.0 1798 22.6 1.5 bcd 1.2 5.2 398.98 53.67 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 5 Mertect 15 G A/100 KG 89 3.3 0.9 bc 0.4 b 1.0 1759 23.4 1.5 bcd 0.9 6.0 384.96 39.65 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 6 Mertect 30 G A/100 KG 89 3.3 0.5 bc 0.4 b 1.0 1765 23.2 1.7 bc 1.2 6.5 379.57 34.26 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 7 A15120C 19.5 G A/100 KG 92 3.0 0.1 c 0.4 b 0.0 1804 21.6 1.3 cd 1.4 5.3 397.81 52.50 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 8 A15120C 39 G A/100 KG 91 2.5 0.0 c 0.1 b 0.0 1815 23.2 1.0 d 1.1 3.0 420.65 75.34 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 9 Gaucho 62.5 G A/100 KG 94 2.8 3.2 a 0.5 b 5.0 1555 22.1 2.3 a 1.5 9.6 309.85-35.46 Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 10 BASF Product 4 G A/100 KG 97 3.0 1.5 bc 1.3 a 4.0 1697 23.1 2.0 ab 1.0 10.0 337.98-7.33 Cruiser 5FS 1.82 G A/100 KG 50 G A/100 KG 11 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 103 2.5 1.8 ab 0.6 b 4.0 1653 22.6 1.7 bc 1.3 6.1 357.97 12.66 Agress G A/100 KG 12 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 97 3.0 0.7 bc 0.3 b 2.0 1645 22.8 1.7 bc 1.2 4.5 369.49 24.18 Agress G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) 13 0.9 1.6 0.6 4.1 251 1.6 0.6 0.4 4.8 71.53 CV 9.3 20.2 108.6 102.0 131.3 8.6 4.1 21.4 21.0 45.8 11.4 Grand Mean 93 3.0 1.0 0.4 2.2 1716 22.7 1.6 1.3 6.2 372.03 Treatment Prob(F) 0.17 0.47 0.02 0.04 0.34 0.49 0.52 0.01 0.13 0.20 0.19 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) 0-100 Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 9

Syngenta Seed Treatment OAC REX Anthracnose Observations 0-100 Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPADE Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check 92 3.3 6.3 ab 3.8 a 9.0 ab 1537 d 24.3 bc 2.0 a 1.9 8.5 abc 313.89 d Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 2 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 104 2.8 5.2 abc 3.0 ab 1.0 cd 1736 bcd 24.2 bc 1.6 ab 1.5 4.9 bcd 384.77 bcd 70.87 3 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 94 2.9 1.3 cd 0.1 d 0.0 d 1926 a-d 24.9 ab 1.0 c 1.6 3.2 d 444.21 abc 130.31 Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 4 Mertect 7.5 G A/100 KG 92 2.8 3.0 bcd 0.8 cd 4.0 bcd 2029 abc 24.2 bc 1.8 ab 1.6 6.5 a-d 433.81 bc 119.91 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 5 Mertect 15 G A/100 KG 91 3.4 2.0 bcd 0.7 cd 5.0 bcd 2064 abc 24.6 ab 1.5 abc 1.3 6.6 a-d 440.48 abc 126.58 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 6 Mertect 30 G A/100 KG 94 2.8 0.7 d 0.3 d 1.0 cd 2332 a 25.2 ab 1.0 c 1.0 3.2 d 542.07 a 228.17 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 7 A15120C 19.5 G A/100 KG 101 2.6 0.4 d 0.2 d 2.0 cd 2234 a 25.7 a 1.5 abc 1.0 5.9 a-d 486.47 ab 172.57 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 8 A15120C 39 G A/100 KG 85 2.9 3.5 bcd 1.3 bcd 4.0 cd 2138 ab 25.0 ab 1.6 ab 1.1 4.3 cd 481.72 ab 167.82 Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 9 Gaucho 62.5 G A/100 KG 93 3.0 9.4 a 2.6 abc 11.0 a 1713 cd 23.3 c 1.9 a 1.6 8.9 ab 348.60 cd 34.70 Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 10 BASF Product 4 G A/100 KG 93 3.1 4.5 bcd 2.1 a-d 6.0 bc 2043 abc 24.8 ab 1.9 a 1.3 9.4 a 413.76 bcd 99.86 Cruiser 5FS 1.82 G A/100 KG 50 G A/100 KG 11 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 100 2.5 2.5 bcd 1.0 bcd 4.0 cd 1963 abc 24.0 bc 1.5 abc 1.5 4.8 bcd 440.53 abc 126.63 Agress G A/100 KG 12 CruiserMaxx Bean 56.25 G A/100 KG 102 2.9 0.5 d 0.2 d 1.0 cd 1988 abc 24.8 ab 1.3 bc 1.7 3.6 d 454.20 abc 140.30 Agress G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) 13 0.7 4.5 2.1 4.9 408 1.2 0.6 0.8 4.3 106.13 CV 9.4 15.9 94.7 107.0 86.4 14.3 3.4 24.7 39.5 51.5 17.0 Grand Mean 95 2.9 3.3 1.3 4.0 1975 24.6 1.5 1.4 5.8 432.04 Treatment Prob(F) 0.18 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.43 0.04 0.01 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) 0-100 Additional Value ($ per acre) Footnotes Trial Summary (c) Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour (d) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: OAC REX This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post (e) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (f) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 14,25) 10

Chemtura & Norac Anthracnose Seed Treatment Trial Lesions Observations 0-100 Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 4 WAP 5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 13 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAEE Pick (g) Value (h) 0-100 $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check 87 3.3 2.7 0.7 7 a 1582 d 21.1 2.1 a 8.9 6.7 315.66 d 2 Apron Maxx RTA 6.25 G A/100 KG 94 3.0 1.2 0.4 0 b 2049 bc 21.1 1.5 bc 6.7 3.9 440.74 abc 125.08 3 Rancona Summit 100 2.8 1.1 0.9 1 b 1866 c 21.2 1.5 bc 8.9 5.9 374.19 cd 58.53 4 Apron Maxx RTA 6.25 G A/100 KG 95 3.0 0.2 0.2 0 b 2038 bc 20.8 1.1 cd 7.6 2.6 446.54 abc 130.88 Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 5 NCF (TPM)(Third) 2.1 G A/100 KG 104 2.5 0.0 0.0 1 b 2318 a 21.0 1.3 cd 8.1 3.9 492.00 a 176.34 6 NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.08 G A/100 KG 91 3.0 0.3 0.0 0 b 1977 bc 21.0 1.1 cd 5.6 4.6 425.81 abc 110.15 7 NCF (TPM)(Standard) 6.15 G A/100 KG 106 2.5 0.1 0.0 0 b 2074 abc 21.0 1.0 d 6.6 1.3 472.43 ab 156.77 8 NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.07 G A/100 KG 108 2.8 1.1 0.6 1 b 1973 bc 21.5 1.8 ab 5.6 5.9 411.73 bc 96.07 UBI 4337 9 Rancona Summit 88 3.3 0.3 0.3 0 b 2118 abc 21.8 1.3 cd 6.6 3.0 464.98 ab 149.32 NCF (TPM)(Third) 2.1 G A/100 KG 10 Rancona Summit 100 2.8 0.9 0.4 1 b 2201 ab 21.7 1.5 bc 6.2 3.0 485.75 ab 170.09 NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.07 G A/100 KG 11 Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 36.5 G A/100 KG 97 3.0 0.1 0.0 0 b 2015 bc 21.1 1.5 bc 8.1 3.3 432.68 abc 117.02 12 Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 73 G A/100 KG 87 3.8 1.7 0.3 1 b 2017 bc 21.4 1.8 ab 8.1 4.4 424.13 abc 108.47 13 Caption CT (TPM)(Half) 36.4 G A/100 KG 101 2.5 0.4 0.3 1 b 2132 abc 20.7 1.8 ab 8.1 5.1 440.54 abc 124.88 14 Caption CT(TPM)(Standard) 72.8 G A/100 KG 97 3.0 0.0 0.2 1 b 2084 abc 21.1 1.5 bc 6.7 3.9 448.89 abc 133.23 LSD (P=.05) 14 n/a n/a n/a 2.64 268 n/a 0.4 4.0 3.2 77.10 CV 10.3 18.8 161.1 133.3 179.5 9.2 2.9 21.1 38.5 54.4 12.4 Grand Mean 97 2.9 0.72 0.31 1.03 2032 21.8 1.5 7.3 4.1 434.01 Treatment Prob(F) 0.06 0.13 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.80 0.10 0.01 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) 0-100 Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-20-20 lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 30-0-0 lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 11

Mechanical Dispersal T9905 Anthracnose 0-100 1-10 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. beforedockage 11.5 WAP 11.5 WAP 13.5 WAP 15.5 WAP adj. for moist Trt No. Treatment Name 1 Denim Dry 5.6 3.3 c 14.5 8.0 c 2451 a 23.6 3.1 2.3 14.4 419 a 2 Denim Wet 13.0 5.8 a 18.9 13.0 bc 2164 bc 23.9 4.4 2.3 14.0 370 abc 3 Leather Dry 6.3 4.3 abc 17.2 12.0 bc 2182 bc 24.9 3.8 2.8 20.7 308 bcd 4 Leather Wet 8.5 5.3 ab 13.2 15.0 ab 2211 abc 24.1 4.6 2.8 16.9 347 a-d 5 Rubber Dry 5.0 3.3 c 11.6 11.0 bc 2333 ab 24.0 5.3 2.5 14.1 398 ab 6 Rubber Wet 9.9 3.8 bc 14.6 11.0 bc 2214 abc 23.4 4.4 2.8 19.6 322 a-d 7 Painted Metal Dry 7.7 2.6 c 15.0 14.0 bc 2037 c 24.0 4.8 3.0 22.9 267 d 8 Painted Metal Wet 8.4 5.3 ab 18.0 21.0 a 2038 c 24.9 4.1 3.0 22.4 278 cd LSD (P=.05) 5.5 1.9 8.8 6.7 252.0 1.5 2.2 0.7 7.8 101 CV 46.8 31.4 39.0 35.0 7.8 4.3 34.1 17.2 29.2 20.2 Grand Mean 8.03 4.17 15.35 12.97 2204 24.12 4.3 2.7 18.1 339 Treatment Prob(F) 0.12 0.02 0.67 0.02 0.04 0.41 0.57 0.17 0.10 0.04 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (c) Rating measuring the spread within the middle 3 rows 1-10 ( 1=none, 10=total) (d) (e) (f) (g) (g) Observations Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. Veins Infected Pods Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams Trial Summary Seed Quality (e) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: May 23 Variety: T9905 given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 15 inch (38 cms) Fertilizer: Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Multiple insecticides and fungicides were applied to Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. minimize distortions in the data determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 5 m. Harvest Date: Sept. 12 Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (1g.ai) applied to them to reduce better *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it (f) Dockage 0-100 1-5 Pick (g) 0-100 Value (h) $ per acre 12

Bacterial Blight Trial Early Planted Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Vigour Leaf Infection Leaf Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best1-100% 1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac. Rating Date 6/19/2006 6/22/2009 6/26/2009 6/22/2009 6/26/2009 7/6/2009 8/11/2009 8/19/2009 g. Crop Stage VC VC VC/V1 VC VC/V1 V3 Crop Stage Scale 2 WAP 3 WAP 4 WAP 3 WAP 4 WAP 5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Infected Seed Check 75 ab 73 80 abc 4.3 b 2.8 b 2.3 bcd 1.5 1.4 20.9 9.1 1.6 2177 ab 449 abc 2 Apron Maxx RTA 80 ab 79 84 ab 4.5 b 3.3 b 2.8 b 1.6 1.3 21.6 8.7 1.1 1908 c 395 cd Dynasty 3 Agress 77 ab 77 78 bc 4.3 b 2.8 b 2.5 bc 1.7 1.7 20.9 11 1.9 1949 bc 384 d 4 Apron Maxx RTA 74 b 73 74 c 4.0 b 2.6 b 1.8 d 0.5 0.5 21.2 6.9 1.3 2220 a 481 a Dynasty Agress 5 Cruiser 84 a 83 88 a 3.3 b 2.6 b 2.0 cd 0.9 0.8 21.2 7.8 1.5 2073 abc 437 a-d Apron Maxx RTA Dynasty Agress 6 Apron Maxx RTA 77 ab 77 78 bc 4.3 b 2.8 b 1.9 d 1.0 1.6 21.3 8.8 1.6 2234 a 460 ab Ag-Streptomycin 7 Apron Maxx RTA 63 c 71 73 c 6.0 a 4.0 a 3.6 a 1.4 1.6 21.0 9.9 1.9 2059 abc 413 bcd Kocide 2000 LSD (P=.05) 9.8 10.7 8.7 1.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.6 1.1 2.8 0.6 229 60 CV 9 9 7 22 15 15 85 87 3.4 21.6 23.7 7.4 9.4 Grand Mean 75.9 76.3 79.2 4.4 3.0 2.4 1.2 1.3 21.15 8.85 1.55 2089 431.23 Treatment Prob(F) 0.01 0.25 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.66 0.85 0.17 0.07 0.04 0.03 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 22 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolourationrow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20- 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Oct.6 13

Bacterial Blight Trial Late Planted Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Leaf Infection Leaf Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-100% 1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac. Rating Date 6/26/2009 6/30/2009 7/07/2009 7/06/2009 7/23/2009 8/11/2009 8/19/2009 g. Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2 WAP 3 WAP 3 WAP 5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Infected Seed Check 61 b 70 b 76 2.5 3.5 a 0.9 0.9 20.1 0.2 1.6 2279 567.82 2 Apron Maxx RTA 68 b 78 b 78 2.8 2.4 bcd 1.4 0.6 19.8 0.2 1.3 2287 569.66 Dynasty 3 Agress 63 b 75 b 77 2.8 2.6 bcd 0.7 0.3 19.9 0.2 1.6 2204 549.22 4 Apron Maxx RTA 70 b 76 b 78 2.6 2.3 cd 0.6 0.8 20.3 0.2 1.3 2416 601.97 Dynasty Agress 5 Cruiser 83 a 88 a 87 2.3 1.9 d 0.4 0.3 20.5 0.2 1.6 2402 597.80 Apron Maxx RTA Dynasty Agress 6 Apron Maxx RTA 65 b 75 b 76 2.4 2.8 abc 0.4 0.7 19.3 0.2 1.8 1996 497.39 Ag-Streptomycin 7 Apron Maxx RTA 62 b 73 b 76 3.0 3.1 ab 0.4 0.4 20.4 0.1 1.5 2428 605.55 Kocide 2000 LSD (P=.05) 9 9 9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.5 295 73.60 CV 9.0 7.7 7.6 19.7 19.4 93.6 113.2 2.7 44.0 20.8 8.7 8.7 Grand Mean 67 76 78 2.6 2.6 0.7 0.6 20.1 16.9 1.5 2287 569.92 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 0.01 0.13 0.46 0.01 0.28 0.71 0.06 0.48 0.22 0.07 0.07 ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 22 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolourow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 16 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Oct.1 14

White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head Study - 1 st Planting 2009 Seed 100 Seed Phyto Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Quality Weight Pick Yield Yield - Pick No. Treatment Nane Rate Units (1-10) 11 DAA 14 DAA 21 DAA 39 DAA 11 DAA 14 DAA 21 DAA 39 DAA (1-5) (g) (%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha) 1 Untreated 0 19 a 26 abc 57 a 85 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 1.0 1.8 bc 29.2 bc 3.0 1410 bcd 1366 bcd 2 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 0 7 bc 12 cd 40 b 58 cd 0.7 bc 1.0 ab 1.0 1.0 1.8 bc 30.6 ab 3.4 1909 abc 1841 abc 3 Lance (70% DF) 1 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 5 c 11 d 37 bc 50 de 0.8 ab 1.0 ab 1.0 1.0 1.9 abc 30.7 ab 4.2 1955 abc 1874 abc 4 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 7 bc 15 bcd 40 b 48 de 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 1.0 2.1 ab 29.1 bc 4.1 1870 abc 1795 abc 5 Allegro 500F 2 Appl 500 G A/HA 0 3 c 6 d 31 bc 47 de 0.7 bc 1.0 ab 1.0 1.0 1.5 c 31.0 ab 2.5 2220 a 2167 a 6 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 16 ab 26 ab 53 a 70 bc 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 1.0 2.1 ab 26.4 cd 5.1 1371 cd 1288 cd 7 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 3 c 9 d 33 bc 38 e 0.8 ab 0.9 ab 1.0 1.0 2.1 ab 31.2 ab 2.9 2405 a 2335 a Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 8 Bayer Exp 1 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 2 c 4 d 25 c 37 e 0.5 c 0.7 c 1.0 1.0 1.9 abc 28.8 bc 5.5 2255 a 2141 a 9 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 150 G A/HA 0 3 c 6 d 32 bc 46 de 0.7 bc 1.0 a 1.0 1.0 1.9 abc 31.1 ab 4.1 2025 ab 1943 ab 10 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 4 c 5 d 30 bc 46 de 0.7 bc 0.8 bc 1.0 1.0 2.3 a 32.8 a 4.5 2305 a 2207 a 11 Calcium Chloride 2 Appl 874 G A/HA 0 25 a 40 a 63 a 81 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 1.0 1.8 bc 24.6 d 3.4 868 d 839 d 12 Senator 2 Appl 1210 G A/HA 0 7 bc 12 cd 37 bc 55 d 0.8 ab 1.0 ab 1.0 1.0 1.8 bc 32.5 a 2.3 2106 a 2057 a LSD (0.05) 0.0 10.8 14.1 12.7 14.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.1 2.3 628.8 611.1 CV 0.0 89.1 68.3 22.2 17.6 25.1 11.9 0.0 0.0 15.9 7.1 42.1 23.0 23.2 Mean 0.0 8.4 14.3 39.8 55.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 1.0 1.9 29.8 3.7 1891.6 1821.1 Pr>F 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 Trial Summary Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Beryl Row Width: 15 inch (38 cm) Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (June 4) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 31) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 4 rows Sclerotia applied Feb 17, Ascospores applied Aug 5 Plot Length: 6m. Irrigation water applied Aug. 5, 10, 13, 17, 23 Harvest Length: 4m. Fungicide Application A: Aug. 6 (30% bloom), B: Aug. 19 (full bloom) Seeding Rate: 15 seeds / m CO 2 sprayer, 11003 Air Bubblejet flat fan, 300 l/ha, 310 Kpa 15

White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head Study - 2 nd Planting 2009 100 Seed Phyto Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Weight Pick Yield Yield - Pick No. Treatment Nane Rate Units (1-10) 12 DAA 24 DAA 42 DAA 12 DAA 24 DAA 42 DAA (g) (%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha) 1 Untreated 0 41 ab 79 a 87 a 1.0 1.0 1.0 24 19 344 e 292 d 2 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 0 32 abc 68 abc 73 a-d 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 19 487 cde 394 cd 3 Lance (70% DF) 1 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 30 a-d 67 abc 73 bcd 1.0 1.0 1.0 21 19 581 b-e 470 bcd 4 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 21 cd 60 bcd 67 cde 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 18 829 a-d 676 a-d 5 Allegro 500F 2 Appl 500 G A/HA 0 17 cd 54 cd 65 cde 1.0 1.0 1.0 24 16 965 abc 810 ab 6 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 29 a-d 70 abc 77 abc 1.0 1.0 1.0 22 17 617 b-e 515 a-d 7 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 29 a-d 63 a-d 72 bcd 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 17 636 b-e 529 a-d Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 8 Bayer Exp 1 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 20 cd 56 cd 67 cde 0.9 1.0 1.0 25 15 878 abc 754 abc 9 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 150 G A/HA 0 17 cd 49 d 56 e 0.9 1.0 1.0 24 22 1126 a 891 a 10 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 14 d 49 d 61 de 0.8 1.0 1.0 22 20 1037 ab 838 ab 11 Calcium Chloride 2 Appl 874 G A/HA 0 42 a 76 ab 85 ab 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 13 364 de 320 d 12 Senator 2 Appl 1210 G A/HA 0 24 bcd 58 cd 62 de 0.9 1.0 1.0 23 22 814 a-e 636 a-d LSD (0.05) 0.0 17.5 17.0 14.3 na na na na na 479.2 405.6 CV 0.0 46.0 18.9 14.1 12.7 0.0 0.0 11.8 23.7 45.9 47.3 Mean 0.0 26.3 62.3 70.4 0.9 1.0 1.0 22.9 18.0 723.0 593.6 Pr>F 1.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.12 0.03 0.04 Trial Summary Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 29 Variety: Beryl Row Width: 15 inch (38 cm) Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (June 4) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 31) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 4 rows Sclerotia applied Feb 17, Ascospores applied Aug 17 Plot Length: 6m. Irrigation water applied Aug. 5, 10, 13, 17, 23 Harvest Length: 4m. Fungicide Application A: Aug. 19 (30% bloom), B: Aug. 31 (full bloom) Seeding Rate: 15 seeds / m CO 2 sprayer, 11003 Air Bubblejet flat fan, 300 l/ha, 310 Kpa 16

Desiccation in Kidney Beans (Red Hawk) with Glyphosate Tankmixes Description Plant Response to Desiccant Residue Analysis Part Rated leaf leaf pod pod stem stem YIELD Adjusted Seed Quality glyphosate AMPA glofos Diquat Carfen flumiox Rating Date 5 DAA 10 DAA 5 DAA 10 DAA 5 DAA 10 DAA KG/HA 100 seed 1-5 inate trazone azin Rating Data Type % leaf drop % leaf drop % pod % pod % stem % stem wt 1=excellent ammon ethyl Rating Unit or brown or brown yellow yellow brown brown 5=poor Trt Treatment Rate No. Name Rate Unit 1 Untreated check 80 f 94 c 84 de 100 8 f 41 f 1645 49.4 1.3 2 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 88 e 100 a 93 bc 100 15 ef 75 bcd 1925 51.9 1.5 0.404 ab 0.020 3 diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA 98 abc 99 ab 98 ab 100 28 cde 80 a-d 2090 51.2 1.4 0.010 AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 4 diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 45 ab 95 a 1854 50.9 1.1 0.010 AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 5 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 98 abc 100 a 93 bc 100 19 def 91 ab 2028 50.8 1.5 0.208 6 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 98 abc 100 a 94 abc 100 31 bcd 90 ab 1796 51.1 1.6 0.430 7 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA 84 ef 98 b 83 e 100 8 f 44 f 2031 52.8 1.6 0.002 AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 8 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA 86 e 100 a 90 cd 100 15 ef 50 ef 1859 50.1 1.5 0.002 AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 9 flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA 96 a-d 100 a 98 ab 100 31 bcd 68 de 2053 51.2 2.0 0.002 Merge 0.5 % V/V 10 flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 96 abc 100 28 cde 69 cde 1959 51.0 1.8 0.002 Merge 0.5 % V/V 11 saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 98 ab 100 38 abc 79 a-d 1937 51.4 1.8 Merge 0.5 % V/V 12 saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 100 a 100 48 a 98 a 1769 50.1 2.1 Merge 0.5 % V/V 13 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 95 bcd 100 a 94 abc 100 26 cde 85 a-d 1822 51.4 1.8 0.085 d 0.020 0.010 diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 14 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 30 b-e 89 ab 1876 51.0 1.1 0.047 d 0.020 0.010 diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 15 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 96 a-d 100 a 95 abc 100 23 c-f 95 a 1911 51.7 1.8 0.206 bcd 0.020 0.250 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 16 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 98 ab 100 25 cde 95 a 1848 50.6 1.9 0.078 d 0.020 0.218 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 17 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 94 cd 100 a 93 bc 100 30 b-e 83 a-d 2070 51.8 1.5 0.143 cd 0.020 0.002 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 18 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 93 d 100 a 93 bc 100 24 cde 85 a-d 1942 52.5 1.9 0.365 ab 0.020 0.002 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 19 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 96 abc 100 29 cde 89 ab 1945 51.5 1.8 0.028 d 0.020 0.002 flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 20 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 95 abc 100 34 a-d 94 ab 2052 52.0 1.8 0.315 abc 0.020 0.002 flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 21 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 98 ab 100 19 def 88 abc 2062 51.8 2.0 0.443 a 0.020 saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 22 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 100 a 100 33 a-d 95 a 1945 51.4 2.1 0.329 abc 0.020 saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V LSD (P=.05) 5 1 7 n/a 16 19 n/a n/a n/a 0.219 NA NA NA NA NA CV 3.4 1.0 5.0 0.0 42.8 16.6 11.6 3.6 26.4 68.370 1.500 41.630 NA NA NA Grand Mean 95 100 95 100 26 81 1928 51.3 1.7 0.220 0.020 0.280 0.002 0.002 0.002 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.79 0.05 0.00 0.45 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 All desiccant applications were made on Sept. 8 when all the plots on average had 80% of the pods yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if 95% of the pods is yellow) MRL Glyposate Glufosinate Diquat Carfentrazone Flumioxazin Trial Summary Ignite Reglone Aim Valtera Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 100,000 seeds / acre EU 2.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 16 Japan 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.npk lbs actual US 5.0 0.2 n/a 0.1 0.1 No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual Canada 4.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 Plot Length: 6m. liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 16) Harvest Length: 3.5 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha Harvest Date: Oct.4&5 17

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) 2009 - Narrow Row Whites (T9905) Trial ID: 09DPFNAH Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (e Days to Yield Observations %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams 1-5 Maturity Kg/Ha Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. 12 DAP 21 DAP 12 DAP 21 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 75 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist (Factor A) (Factor B) 1 0 77 88 7.0 7.5 6.3 c 7.4 c 6.6 0.193 39.0 20.6 1.6 104 1867 2 35 77 89 7.0 7.5 7.0 abc 7.8 abc 7.4 0.168 40.8 20.7 1.6 104 2019 3 70 82 88 7.4 7.4 7.4 ab 8.0 ab 7.1 0.191 40.2 20.7 1.5 103 1863 4 105 79 85 7.3 7.3 7.8 a 8.3 ab 7.5 0.197 42.9 21.6 1.5 104 2099 5 140 76 82 7.1 7.5 7.6 ab 8.5 a 8.0 0.202 43.8 21.3 1.6 105 2189 6 175 73 87 6.4 7.6 7.1 ab 7.4 c 7.8 0.185 43.4 21.8 1.6 104 2042 1 Untreated 75 b 85 6.9 7.4 7.0 7.8 7.3 0.184 41.3 21.0 1.5 104 1957 2 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 79 a 87 7.1 7.5 7.4 8.0 7.5 0.194 42.0 21.2 1.6 104 2070 1/1 0 Untreated 75 84 b-e 6.8 7.0 6.0 7.3 6.8 0.195 38.5 20.4 1.6 ab 105 1848 2/1 35 Untreated 78 89 abc 7.3 7.8 7.0 8.0 7.3 0.148 41.1 20.5 1.3 a 104 1924 3/1 70 Untreated 77 82 c 7.0 7.3 7.0 8.0 7.5 0.173 40.1 20.8 1.6 ab 103 2012 4/1 105 Untreated 77 85 b 7.0 7.3 7.5 8.0 7.5 0.211 42.5 21.4 1.5 ab 104 2055 5/1 140 Untreated 77 85 b 7.5 7.8 7.8 8.5 7.8 0.195 43.3 21.3 1.5 ab 105 2078 6/1 175 Untreated 69 87 a-d 6.0 7.5 6.8 7.0 7.3 0.184 42.4 21.4 1.6 ab 103 1823 1/2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 79 91 ab 7.3 8.0 6.5 7.5 6.5 0.190 39.5 20.7 1.5 ab 103 1887 2/2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 77 88 a-d 6.8 7.3 7.0 7.5 7.5 0.187 4.1 20.8 1.9 b 105 2115 3/2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 86 93 a 7.8 7.5 7.8 8.0 6.8 0.209 40.2 20.6 1.4 ab 103 1714 4/2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 81 85 b 7.5 7.3 8.0 8.5 7.5 0.184 43.3 21.8 1.5 ab 105 2142 5/2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 76 79 e 6.8 7.3 7.5 8.5 8.3 0.208 44.4 21.2 1.6 ab 106 2301 6/2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 78 86 a-e 6.8 7.8 7.5 7.8 8.3 0.186 44.4 22.1 1.5 ab 105 2261 Mean 77 86 7.0 7.5 7.2 7.9 7.4 0.189 41.7 21.1 1.6 104 2014 PR>F (A) PR>F (B) 0.20 0.04 0.23 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.88 0.65 0.04 0.17 0.04 0.48 0.19 0.69 0.61 0.40 0.19 0.57 0.02 0.27 0.99 0.59 0.27 0.23 0.58 0.35 PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) 0.45 N/A 0.05 N/A 0.16 N/A 0.18 N/A 0.85 0.9 0.71 0.8 0.68 N/A 0.55 N/A 0.99 N/A 0.87 0.8 0.03 N/A 0.52 N/A 0.63 N/A LSD(0.05) (B) 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.4 N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety T9905 This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 15 inch (38 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rows Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 19 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. - 15 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 23 by Tractor mounted Probe 18

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) 2009 - Light Kidneys (Pink Panther) Trial ID: 09DPFNBH Observations Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. (Factor A) (Factor B) Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Days to Yield %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams Maturity Kg/Ha 13 DAP 22 DAP 13 DAP 22 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist 1 0 74 84 7.0 7.0 7.9 7.1 0.287 bc 39.3 61.4 99 1237 2 35 74 82 7.1 6.9 7.6 7.3 0.291 abc 39.3 61.2 99 1236 3 70 74 79 7.1 7.0 8.0 8.1 0.322 ab 42.0 62.3 100 1386 4 105 74 84 7.3 7.3 8.3 8.1 0.330 ab 41.1 62.6 100 1380 5 140 71 79 6.9 7.3 8.0 8.1 0.337 a 41.5 62.2 100 1373 6 175 70 79 6.5 7.0 7.9 7.5 0.261 c 46.4 62.4 100 1269 1 Untreated 71 81 6.9 7.0 7.9 7.7 0.298 40.0 62.3 100 1320 2 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 74 82 7.0 7.1 8.0 7.8 0.311 43.1 61.8 99 1307 1/1 0 Untreated 71 82 6.8 6.8 7.5 6.5 0.281 37.1 61.9 100 1149 2/1 35 Untreated 76 82 7.3 7.0 7.8 7.5 0.296 39.6 61.8 100 1226 3/1 70 Untreated 73 81 7.0 6.8 8.3 8.8 0.332 43.0 62.1 100 1435 4/1 105 Untreated 72 82 7.3 7.3 8.0 8.0 0.311 39.5 63.2 100 1400 5/1 140 Untreated 68 77 6.8 7.5 8.0 7.8 0.305 41.8 63.0 100 1434 6/1 175 Untreated 68 79 6.5 6.8 8.0 7.5 0.264 39.1 61.9 100 1276 1/2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 78 87 7.3 7.3 8.3 7.8 0.293 41.4 60.9 99 1324 2/2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 73 82 7.0 6.8 7.5 7.0 0.286 39.0 60.7 99 1245 3/2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 74 77 7.3 7.3 7.8 7.5 0.312 41.0 62.5 100 1337 4/2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 76 87 7.3 7.3 8.5 8.3 0.349 42.7 62.1 100 1360 5/2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 74 81 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 0.369 41.1 61.5 99 1312 6/2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 71 79 6.5 7.3 7.8 7.5 0.258 53.6 62.9 100 1263 Mean 73 81 7.0 7.1 8.0 7.8 0.305 41.6 62.1 PR>F (A) 0.70 0.43 0.42 0.86 0.66 0.15 0.02 0.61 0.42 PR>F (B) 0.20 0.45 0.57 0.54 0.84 0.78 0.34 0.22 0.25 PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) 0.88 N/A 0.79 N/A 0.94 N/A 0.58 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.20 N/A 0.47 0.048 0.43 N/A 0.59 N/A LSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) 100 1314 0.52 0.28 0.17 0.80 0.89 0.64 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety Pink Panther This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowinsecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) - 15 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 14 by Tractor mounted Probe Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 8 Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. 19

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) 2009 - Cranberry Beans (Etna) Observations Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. (Factor A) (Factor B) 1 0 69 a 84 a 7.4 6.8 7.3 6.8 0.266 34.9 53.6 97 1809 b 2 35 61 bc 79 b 6.4 6.5 7.3 7.3 0.299 34.7 53.5 97 1842 b 3 70 64 bc 84 a 7.3 6.8 8.0 7.8 0.275 36.2 53.0 98 2124 a 4 105 62 bc 80 b 7.1 6.5 7.8 7.8 0.285 35.4 53.9 98 2098 a 5 140 68 ab 85 a 7.4 6.9 7.5 7.8 0.292 35.7 53.3 98 2003 ab 6 175 65 ab 82 ab 7.1 6.4 7.8 7.4 0.264 34.5 53.1 97 1981 ab 1 Untreated 64 82 7.1 6.3 b 7.3 b 7.1 0.280 35.3 53.5 97 1958 2 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 65 82 7.1 7.0 a 7.8 a 7.8 0.280 35.2 53.4 98 1994 1/1 0 Untreated 68 79 7.3 6.0 6.8 6.0 c 0.252 34.1 54.1 ab 97 1750 2/1 35 Untreated 57 81 6.3 6.3 6.8 6.5 bc 0.322 35.5 54.3 ab 97 1909 3/1 70 Untreated 64 85 7.5 6.5 8.0 7.8 a 0.281 36.0 53.9 ab 98 2205 4/1 105 Untreated 63 81 7.3 6.3 7.8 7.8 a 0.279 36.6 53.0 ab 98 2094 5/1 140 Untreated 70 86 7.3 6.5 7.3 7.5 ab 0.287 35.4 52.4 b 98 1879 6/1 175 Untreated 63 81 7.3 6.3 7.5 7.0 b 0.260 34.0 53.0 ab 97 1910 1/2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 69 89 7.5 7.5 7.8 7.5 ab 0.280 35.7 53.2 ab 97 1868 2/2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 64 76 6.5 6.8 7.8 8.0 a 0.275 34.0 52.7 b 97 1775 3/2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 64 84 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.8 a 0.268 36.4 52.1 b 98 2042 4/2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 61 79 7.0 6.8 7.8 7.8 a 0.290 34.3 54.7 a 98 2101 5/2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 67 83 7.5 7.3 7.8 8.0 a 0.297 36.0 54.2 ab 98 2126 6/2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 67 83 7.0 6.5 8.0 7.8 a 0.267 34.9 53.2 ab 98 2052 Mean 65 82 7.1 6.7 7.6 7.5 0.280 35.2 53.4 98 1976 PR>F (A) PR>F (B) PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) 0.02 0.30 0.90 5 0.01 0.87 0.32 4 0.26 0.72 0.95 N/A 0.68 0.02 0.56 N/A 0.09 0.02 0.09 N/A 0.14 0.02 0.03 N/A 0.35 0.97 0.67 N/A 0.79 0.87 0.12 N/A 0.85 0.73 0.03 N/A 0.24 0.61 0.96 N/A 0.05 0.65 0.45 228.0 LSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A 0.4 0.4 0.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.8 N/A N/A 1.9 N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Trial ID: 09DPFNCH Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Days to Yield %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams Maturity Kg/Ha 13 DAP 22 DAP 13 DAP 22 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety Etna This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowinsecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) - 15 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 9 by Tractor mounted Probe Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 2 Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. 20

09DVCAK Major Coloured Bean R. & P. Trial - Kippen Seed Blight Blight 100 Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality 1-10 1-10 Seed Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Aug10 Sept.10 Weight Maturity 7 OAC 07-6D1 DRK 1 3774 40 2.4 0.9 6.5 60.1 94 M 6 Majesty DRK 2 3186 33 1.7 0.8 4.4 76.5 97 M 5 OAC Derkeller (05-D2) DRK 3 3174 32 1.7 1.4 4.7 64.0 99 L 8 GTS 104 DRK 4 3063 32 2.6 1.3 3.7 58.3 96 M 9 HR 174-4239 DRK 5 2910 31 3.1 1.7 6.7 73.3 95 M 1 Montcalm DRK 6 2871 30 1.8 1.1 3.0 61.1 97 M 4 OAC Redstar DRK 7 2853 31 2.2 0.9 6.1 62.0 93 M 2 AC Calmont DRK 8 2840 30 2.4 1.7 5.2 59.1 96 M 3 Red Hawk DRK 9 2608 28 2.3 2.4 8.2 57.9 92 E 10 SVS-700 DRK 10 2209 24 3.8 3.4 8.1 61.1 93 M Average 2949 31 2.4 1.6 5.7 63.4 95 16 OAC 07-L1 LRK 1 3576 36 1.9 1.1 4.7 67.7 99 L 13 Pink Panther LRK 2 3252 35 2.6 1.6 7.2 67.0 93 M 17 HR201-4849 LRK 3 3195 32 2.1 1.3 5.4 66.0 98 L 14 OAC Lyrik LRK 4 3194 35 2.2 1.5 7.2 68.1 92 E 15 OAC 06-L1 LRK 5 3085 33 5.1 1.8 7.7 61.0 92 E 11 AC Elk LRK 6 2984 32 2.7 1.9 6.6 64.4 95 M 12 Red Kanner LRK 7 2838 29 2.3 1.2 2.9 55.3 98 L 23 HR203-4979 LRK 8 2528 27 2.3 0.8 6.8 69.5 95 M Average 3081 32 2.6 1.4 6.0 64.9 95 19 Hooter Cran 1 3490 36 1.9 1.2 6.0 68.4 96 M 22 HR202-4973 Cran 2 3414 35 2.3 0.9 5.7 67.4 98 L 24 filler (Messina) Cran 3 3251 34 3.3 1.0 5.4 61.9 96 M 21 Red Rider Cran 4 3140 34 3.6 2.1 7.4 64.3 93 M 18 HR204-4265 Cran 5 2838 30 2.4 2.0 6.8 64.4 94 M 20 Etna Cran 6 2810 31 3.2 1.3 7.6 62.5 92 E Average 3157 33 2.8 1.4 6.5 64.8 95 Mean Mean 3045 32 2.6 1.5 6.0 64.5 95 Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V. 8.7 15.1 35.8 19.6 2.9 1.7 PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 313 0.5 0.6 1.4 2.2 1.9 Maturity: <93=E, 93-97=M, >97= L 95 check variety 94 Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.17,Oct.1 21

09KPYTK Cran. Kidney & Misc. PYT - Kippen Seed White Mold Pick 100 Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality 1-10 % Seed Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Sept 10 Weight Maturity 1 Red Kanner LRK 29 3016 30 1.8 3.6 2.8 56.6 102 L 2 CORN 18-V96 LRK 7 3469 35 1.4 3.2 1.9 55.4 99 M 3 CORN 773-V98 LRK 16 3271 34 2.1 5.2 1.5 47.5 95 M 4 CORN 1062-V98 LRK 35 2780 29 1.6 9.0 2.2 64.1 96 M 5 Blush LRK 9 3387 36 2.2 2.5 3.4 70.0 95 M 6 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK 5 3478 37 2.8 7.6 5.0 69.0 94 E 7 ADML945138 LRK 6 3477 37 2.6 7.3 1.3 64.3 93 E 8 CU612 LRK 20 3184 34 3.4 7.0 1.6 55.6 94 E 9 CORN NY118 LRK 10 3382 35 1.9 5.9 1.5 58.8 96 M 10 COB 472-03 DRK 23 3123 34 3.0 3.9 1.4 55.9 93 E 11 USDK-CBB-15 DRK 25 3100 33 3.5 8.0 5.4 57.2 94 E 12 COB 419X-03 DRK 18 3219 35 2.4 3.7 1.4 56.8 92 E 13 ADMD107271 DRK 11 3359 36 2.1 7.2 5.5 60.5 94 E 14 Majesty DRK 31 2932 30 1.8 2.3 2.8 73.9 98 M 15 filler (October) CRAN 17 3244 36 2.4 8.3 2.8 59.0 91 E 16 Etna CRAN 15 3322 36 2.6 5.7 2.0 59.8 92 E 17 ADMC213259 CRAN 13 3353 36 2.9 6.2 2.6 64.1 93 E 18 ADMC000117 CRAN 14 3328 36 3.0 3.6 1.3 66.6 93 E 19 SEM0928 CRAN 12 3359 35 2.3 7.9 1.2 78.5 95 M 20 SEM0929 CRAN 21 3172 35 1.9 5.6 2.1 64.4 91 E 21 Capri CRAN 36 2691 28 2.7 4.3 3.5 66.1 97 M 22 Crimson (BD 1003) CRAN 1 3624 39 2.2 4.7 2.5 69.5 92 E 23 HR 168B CRAN 32 2867 29 2.3 6.1 3.0 75.5 98 M 24 HR 167 CRAN 28 3024 31 2.5 5.7 2.3 68.9 98 M 25 T9905 Navy 2 3617 36 1.5 1.3 2.7 24.5 101 L 26 Condor Black 3 3609 35 1.2 0.8 1.3 24.2 103 L 27 Merlot SRM 22 3151 33 1.9 5.8 3.8 39.1 95 M 28 Sedona Pink 26 3073 34 2.2 4.9 3.8 38.3 91 E 29 Beluga WK 30 3006 30 1.3 5.5 1.0 59.0 100 L 30 filler (ISB 519W) WK 27 3034 29 1.6 2.0 4.8 50.2 105 L 31 Erimo Adzuki 34 2785 27 1.1 1.1 1.0 14.2 103 L 32 Hime Otebo 8 3443 36 1.2 4.7 1.5 32.3 95 M 33 Fuji Otebo 33 2812 29 1.3 2.6 2.6 30.7 96 M 34 Peruano Yellow 19 3199 30 2.3 1.0 4.8 46.9 105 L 35 SEM0863 Yellow 4 3564 34 1.8 2.0 3.1 44.2 105 L 36 PT 99195MR Pinto 24 3108 31 1.9 2.9 4.3 39.6 101 L 37 AC Harosprout Mung Bean 38 492 5 1.4 1.0 7.8 7.4 104 L 38 HDC Exp #1 Mung Bean 37 633 6 1.9 0.2 5.8 7.5 103 L Mean Mean 3071 2.1 4.4 2.9 52.0 97 Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V. 10.0 22.9 32.6 46.6 3.6 1.7 White Mold: 1 = good 10 = poor PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 358 0.6 1.7 1.6 2.2 1.9 Maturity: <95=E, 95-99=M, >99= L #REF! check variety 103 Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.17,Oct.1 22

09DVWBK White Bean Registration and Performance - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Harvest Maturity 6 OAC 07-2 1 3765 116 36 1.0 21.1 1.9 2.0 E 104 L 17 HR177-3719 2 3674 113 37 1.6 20.8 1.9 2.0 E 99 M 8 OAC 07-4 3 3668 113 38 1.6 24.8 1.2 1.5 E 98 M 1 Thunder 4 3583 110 37 1.4 22.8 2.1 3.0 G 98 M 28 T9905 5 3565 110 35 1.0 22.9 2.0 2.8 VG 102 M 7 OAC 07-3 6 3560 110 35 1.4 25.3 1.2 2.3 VG 103 M 27 Gts 564 7 3541 109 35 1.4 20.6 3.7 2.8 VG 101 M 4 OAC Dublin (05-2) 8 3528 109 36 1.3 21.4 2.0 3.3 G 98 M 29 T9903 9 3449 106 34 1.3 21.7 4.0 3.0 G 101 M 24 Reliant 10 3443 106 35 1.8 20.4 2.4 2.5 VG 99 M 36 Filler #1 (Medalist) 11 3435 106 35 1.1 19.9 1.6 2.0 E 97 M 21 HR205-4457 12 3396 104 32 1.4 22.2 1.5 2.0 E 106 L 3 Rex 13 3374 104 32 1.3 22.0 1.8 2.3 VG 106 L 30 T10303 14 3332 102 32 1.1 23.1 1.8 2.0 E 104 L 12 OAC 09-4 15 3257 100 32 1.3 21.6 0.9 2.0 E 102 M 13 AC Compass 16 3244 100 36 1.1 22.7 2.1 2.5 VG 90 E 18 HR193-3931 17 3233 99 30 1.0 20.9 1.4 2.5 VG 108 L 11 OAC 09-3 18 3233 99 32 1.0 21.2 1.7 2.0 E 102 M 2 Lightning 19 3205 99 33 1.5 22.4 2.0 2.0 E 97 M 15 AC Mast 20 3194 98 32 1.3 22.1 3.1 3.3 G 101 M 34 T10307 21 3191 98 31 1.4 22.7 0.9 2.3 VG 104 L 16 AC Cruiser 22 3165 97 32 1.3 20.7 2.6 3.0 G 99 M 5 OAC 06-2 23 3155 97 33 1.1 19.3 1.6 3.0 G 94 E 9 OAC 09-1 24 3132 96 34 1.0 18.1 2.6 3.0 G 93 E 19 HR199-4587 25 3126 96 29 1.4 24.8 2.2 2.3 VG 107 L 26 Gts 544 26 3107 96 33 1.6 23.4 2.1 2.3 VG 93 E 10 OAC 09-2 27 3106 96 32 1.5 18.2 1.3 2.5 VG 98 M 31 T10501 28 3084 95 33 2.0 21.4 1.8 3.0 G 92 E 22 HR206-4170 29 3066 94 29 1.0 22.1 1.9 2.5 VG 105 L 20 HR200-4345 30 3059 94 29 1.3 20.3 1.4 3.0 G 107 L 14 Nautica 31 2962 91 28 1.6 19.8 1.3 2.0 E 107 L 25 Viscount 32 2952 91 29 2.0 18.3 3.7 2.5 VG 102 M 23 Vista 33 2917 90 29 1.9 20.1 2.9 2.0 E 101 M 32 T10601 34 2887 89 31 1.1 21.6 2.2 3.0 G 93 E 33 HY4181 35 2734 84 29 1.1 21.4 4.1 3.5 G 94 E 35 Cirrus 36 2708 83 30 1.4 21.1 3.3 4.3 P 91 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3251 33 1.3 21.5 2.1 2.5 100 Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 8.1 32.6 21.1 2.7 22.1 18.1 1.6 PR > F 0.00 32.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 308 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.5 2 Trial Summary Maturity: <97=E, 97-103=M, >103= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.1=Excellent, 2.1-2.9=VeryGood, 3.0-4.0=Good, >4.0= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 23

09NPYTK Navy PYT - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) 1 3623 112 37 1.3 19.3 2.3 1.1 1.7 VG 98 M 1 T9905 2 3476 108 34 1.5 21.8 3.3 2.0 2.1 VG 101 M 6 COOP 02098 3 3451 107 35 2.0 17.8 4.9 1.0 1.2 E 99 M 4 COOP02084 4 3400 105 36 2.0 19.0 3.4 1.1 2.0 VG 96 E 5 COOP03019 5 3396 105 33 2.0 20.5 5.6 1.5 1.0 E 104 L 8 ADM5027557 6 3333 103 35 2.3 18.5 2.6 1.0 1.5 E 97 M 7 COOP 99039-3 7 3297 102 33 2.0 18.5 5.2 2.0 1.7 VG 101 M 2 MSUN05324 8 3284 102 33 2.0 18.3 1.1 1.0 1.7 VG 99 M 13 ADMN5058573 9 3090 96 31 2.3 20.8 5.8 3.0 2.7 P 101 M 11 Avalanche 10 3045 94 31 1.8 19.8 3.1 1.1 1.8 VG 97 M 9 ADM5039540 11 3021 94 31 1.8 17.8 3.4 1.0 1.4 E 98 M 12 ADMN5059541 12 3004 93 30 1.8 18.8 4.7 1.3 2.1 VG 99 M 10 COB 3785-03 13 2985 93 31 2.0 20.8 6.4 2.8 2.5 G 96 E 14 SEM1010 14 2764 86 28 2.5 17.5 7.0 3.6 3.7 P 100 M Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3226 33 1.9 19.2 4.2 1.7 1.9 99 White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 7.1 23.8 3.6 28.2 14.9 14.4 1.7 PR > F 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 273 n/a 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.3 2 Trial Summary Maturity: <97=E, 97-101=M, >101= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.6=Excellent, 1.6-2.2=VeryGood, 2.3-2.6=Good, >2.6= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 24

09BPYTK Black and Misc. PYT- Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 White White Suitability Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Mold Mold Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Sept.14 Sept.30 Harvest Maturity 2 S10B7 Soybean 1 3931 127 35 1.0 17.4 1.1 0.7 1.0 E 112 L 4 COOP05222 Black 2 3806 123 38 1.5 22.9 7.2 3.1 2.0 E 101 M 11 MSUB04554 (Zorro) Black 3 3746 121 36 1.3 22.4 2.5 3.0 2.0 E 104 M 23 La Paz Pinto 4 3710 120 38 1.3 35.4 6.5 4.4 2.0 E 98 E 12 COB 214-99 Black 5 3603 117 36 1.8 22.4 3.9 2.6 3.4 G 100 M 20 Merlot SR 6 3507 114 35 1.0 38.9 8.7 3.8 4.0 G 99 E 8 Black Velvet Black 7 3446 112 33 1.3 26.3 3.1 2.3 1.9 E 106 L 16 COOP06252 Black 8 3353 109 33 1.8 21.5 5.9 2.6 2.4 VG 102 M 1 T9905 White 9 3339 108 33 1.3 22.1 3.1 1.9 3.0 VG 101 M 3 COOP00044 (Loreto) Black 10 3328 108 33 1.0 23.5 3.4 1.9 2.0 E 101 M 9 ADMB201240 (Shania) Black 11 3324 108 30 1.5 22.0 5.5 2.7 2.3 VG 109 L 5 CORN96-148 Black 12 3315 107 32 1.3 25.6 3.7 3.8 2.9 VG 103 M 6 Eclipse Black 13 3309 107 34 1.5 21.2 3.8 3.7 1.9 E 98 E 13 Jet Black Black 14 3272 106 30 1.8 25.7 5.6 4.2 2.6 VG 108 L 21 Erimo Adzuki 15 3113 101 29 1.3 13.5 0.8 0.7 1.9 E 107 L 19 Blackjack Black 16 3101 100 31 2.0 22.2 4.9 3.9 4.1 P 101 M 7 Condor Black 17 3077 100 30 2.3 22.4 4.6 3.6 3.6 G 103 M 15 COB 2159-00 Black 18 3050 99 29 1.3 27.8 6.8 4.1 3.6 G 105 L 22 Hime Otebo 19 3009 97 31 1.3 30.0 6.5 3.6 3.9 G 97 E 25 filler (GN03138) GN 20 2978 96 29 2.0 45.0 7.2 4.8 2.8 VG 102 M 17 COOP05226 Black 21 2921 95 31 2.0 19.4 4.9 2.0 2.3 VG 94 E 10 ADMB5019630 Black 22 2875 93 28 1.5 23.4 4.9 3.0 2.9 VG 102 M 14 SEM0963 Black 23 2873 93 29 1.5 24.0 7.4 5.0 1.9 E 100 M 18 MSU 05055 Black 24 2821 91 28 1.3 20.1 2.8 1.6 2.5 VG 102 M 26 HDC Exp #1 Mung 25 842 27 8 2.0 7.2 1.0 0.6 5.0 P 103 M 24 AC Harosprout Mung 26 633 20 6 2.0 8.1 0.8 0.7 1.0 E 107 L Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3088 30 1.5 23.5 4.5 2.9 2.6 102 Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 10.2 29.1 4.1 26.3 36.0 29.7 1.5 White Mold 1=none 10= total PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 372 0.5 1.1 1.4 1.2 0.9 2 Maturity: <100=E, 100-104=M, >104= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.2=Excellent, 2.2-3.0=VeryGood, 3.1-4.0=Good, >4= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 25

09PPYTK Pinto PYT - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Harvest Maturity 6 Lariat 1 3940 123 40 2.0 43.6 2.8 2.0 VG 99 M 1 GTS 903 2 3199 100 33 2.0 37.0 4.2 4.3 P 96 M 5 La Paz 3 3092 97 31 2.3 37.1 2.2 1.8 VG 99 M 2 GTS 904 4 3058 96 31 1.3 42.7 5.0 5.0 P 97 M 4 99195MR 5 3044 95 31 2.0 39.8 2.9 2.2 VG 98 M 3 Medicine Hat 6 2860 89 31 2.3 38.2 2.4 2.3 VG 91 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3199 33 2.0 39.7 3.3 2.9 97 White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 4.5 22.4 3.3 24.0 24.9 1.8 PR > F 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 215 n/a 2.0 1.2 1.1 3 Trial Summary Maturity: <94=E, 94-100=M, >100= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.8=Excellent, 1.8-4.0=VeryGood, >4.0= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 26

09DVWBB White Bean Registration and Performance - Narrow Row- Blyth Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Pick Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (%) (1-10) Harvest Maturity 7 OAC 07-3 1 3924 122 37 1.8 22.8 4.9 3.5 1.9 2.2 VG 108 M 36 Filler #1 (Medalist) 2 3804 118 36 2.0 17.2 5.0 2.5 1.9 1.9 VG 106 M 19 HR199-4587 3 3760 117 33 2.0 22.2 8.1 4.0 2.8 3.2 VG 113 L 3 Rex 4 3708 115 33 2.3 18.9 4.5 3.2 2.1 2.2 VG 112 L 8 OAC 07-4 5 3604 112 35 2.0 20.8 5.0 6.8 3.3 3.0 VG 102 E 13 AC Compass 6 3567 111 36 2.0 20.1 5.4 5.1 2.8 2.8 VG 98 E 6 OAC 07-2 7 3476 108 32 2.0 19.2 7.0 6.4 3.3 3.2 VG 110 L 20 HR200-4345 8 3460 107 30 2.3 18.2 5.1 4.5 2.6 2.9 VG 114 L 1 Thunder 9 3447 107 32 1.8 21.4 4.8 3.7 2.9 3.1 VG 106 M 11 OAC 09-3 10 3436 106 31 2.0 18.8 3.5 2.1 1.9 1.7 E 112 L 25 Viscount 11 3355 104 31 2.3 17.1 8.1 5.0 3.9 3.4 VG 110 L 16 AC Cruiser 12 3334 103 33 2.0 19.3 9.3 4.9 2.9 2.9 VG 102 E 27 Gts 564 13 3331 103 33 1.8 17.8 3.7 5.0 2.4 3.0 VG 104 M 22 HR206-4170 14 3306 102 31 2.0 18.9 5.5 4.8 2.6 2.7 VG 114 L 21 HR205-4457 15 3297 102 29 2.3 18.9 3.8 3.7 2.0 2.1 VG 113 L 4 OAC Dublin (05-2) 16 3297 102 31 2.8 19.2 6.1 3.5 3.8 3.9 G 106 M 34 T10307 17 3275 102 31 2.5 20.1 6.4 4.3 1.5 1.4 E 107 M 17 HR177-3719 18 3268 101 30 2.3 16.8 3.8 3.5 2.5 2.4 VG 107 M 12 OAC 09-4 19 3241 100 29 2.0 20.0 5.5 2.2 2.0 2.1 VG 112 L 30 T10303 20 3238 100 29 2.0 20.1 4.2 5.5 3.5 3.1 VG 111 L 18 HR193-3931 21 3238 100 29 2.0 18.5 6.1 4.8 2.5 2.7 VG 112 L 28 T9905 22 3211 100 32 1.5 19.8 3.8 3.1 2.9 2.4 VG 103 E 9 OAC 09-1 23 3152 98 31 1.8 16.7 7.8 3.3 2.6 2.9 VG 103 E 14 Nautica 24 3144 97 28 3.5 17.5 13.1 2.0 2.0 2.3 VG 113 L 2 Lightning 25 3132 97 30 1.8 19.9 5.5 2.1 1.9 2.0 VG 104 M 15 AC Mast 26 3116 97 29 2.5 18.5 11.3 6.6 4.5 4.4 G 106 M 32 T10601 27 3087 96 31 1.8 19.7 2.8 2.0 2.4 2.7 VG 98 E 23 Vista 28 3037 94 28 2.8 16.5 7.4 4.2 2.7 3.1 VG 106 M 24 Reliant 29 2979 92 28 2.5 17.2 6.4 5.2 3.2 3.4 VG 108 M 5 OAC 06-2 30 2933 91 30 2.0 17.5 5.0 3.1 1.5 2.4 VG 99 E 26 Gts 544 31 2931 91 29 2.3 21.0 5.0 7.9 2.5 2.5 VG 99 E 33 HY4181 32 2870 89 29 1.3 20.6 3.1 3.7 2.5 3.1 VG 101 E 10 OAC 09-2 33 2860 89 27 1.8 16.9 5.5 4.2 1.7 2.6 VG 107 M 35 Cirrus 34 2696 84 27 2.5 18.5 12.2 5.5 5.3 5.0 P 98 E 29 T9903 35 2380 74 22 2.0 19.8 6.1 7.2 3.6 3.8 G 106 M 31 T10501 36 2288 71 23 2.5 18.9 8.8 4.8 2.0 2.6 VG 97 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3227 30 2.1 19.0 6.1 4.3 2.7 2.8 106 Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 8.1 30.4 21.0 3.0 37.5 25.6 30.5 27.5 1.8 Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F 0.00 30.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) 305 0.5 0.7 2.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 2 White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Maturity: <104=E, 104-108=M, >108= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.9=Excellent, 1.9-3.7=VeryGood, 3.8-4.8=Good, >4.8= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 54-40-45 NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Hand Harvested Oct. 11& 15 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 27

09NPYTB Navy PYT - Narrow Row- Blyth Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Pick Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (%) (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) 1 3505 126 34 1.7 18.5 2.9 2.6 1.9 2.0 VG 103 M 4 COOP02084 2 3122 112 31 1.2 18.5 0.9 3.8 1.2 2.0 VG 102 M 13 ADMN5058573 3 3117 112 31 1.7 20.1 2.2 2.5 3.3 3.5 P 101 M 5 COOP03019 4 3089 111 29 2.2 18.7 1.0 2.4 2.1 2.0 VG 108 L 7 COOP 99039-3 5 3003 108 29 2.0 17.8 1.9 2.2 2.9 2.5 VG 104 M 6 COOP 02098 6 2937 106 28 2.0 16.5 3.2 4.1 1.0 1.1 E 106 L 2 MSUN05324 7 2870 103 27 2.2 17.7 3.8 3.1 1.4 1.8 VG 106 L 1 AC Compass 8 2796 100 28 2.8 18.2 7.3 3.7 3.4 3.1 G 100 E 9 ADM5039540 9 2613 94 25 1.8 16.6 1.5 2.3 1.4 1.5 E 106 L 8 ADM5027557 10 2599 93 24 2.1 16.7 1.6 2.8 1.2 1.3 E 107 L 12 ADMN5059541 11 2572 92 25 2.0 17.4 1.4 4.0 1.1 2.0 VG 102 M 10 COB 3785-03 12 2428 87 24 1.7 18.7 0.9 2.1 3.3 2.3 VG 101 M 14 SEM1010 13 2197 79 22 2.0 15.5 1.3 4.9 3.2 3.1 G 99 E 11 Avalanche 14 2117 76 20 3.0 18.5 6.7 4.8 2.3 2.3 VG 104 M Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 2783 27 2.0 17.8 2.6 3.2 2.1 2.2 103 Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 10.8 26.9 22.5 3.4 60.2 31.5 21.6 21.0 1.6 Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F 0.00 26.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) 358 0.5 0.7 1.9 1.2 0.5 0.5 2 White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Maturity: <101=E, 101-105=M, >105= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.7=Excellent, 1.7-2.7=VeryGood, 2.8-3.3=Good, >3.4= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 54-40-45 NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Hand Harvested Oct. 8 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 28

09BPYTB Black & Misc. PYT- Narrow Row- Blyth White Mold White Mold Percent Seed 100 Sept.11 Pod Drop Suitability Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield of Ave. Quality Seed (1-10) Oct.3 Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) (1-5) Weight (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 MSUB04554 (Zorro) Black 1 3366 109 1.5 19.6 2.8 3.7 1.3 2.0 E 109 L 5 COOP00044 (Loreto) Black 2 3354 109 2.0 20.7 3.8 3.2 2.8 2.8 VG 106 M 2 COB 214-99 Black 3 3349 108 2.0 18.4 3.3 1.8 2.5 2.5 VG 106 M 9 ADMB201240 (Shania) Black 4 3265 106 2.3 19.5 4.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 E 111 L 12 La Paz Pinto 5 3167 103 2.0 34.4 7.0 6.6 2.3 2.5 VG 106 M 7 Condor Black 6 3149 102 2.0 19.3 3.5 2.8 2.8 3.0 VG 106 M 8 Black Velvet Black 7 3133 101 2.3 22.5 5.8 3.1 2.3 2.0 E 113 L 10 Blackjack Black 8 3068 99 1.5 22.1 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 G 108 M 6 COOP05222 Black 9 3019 98 2.0 19.8 5.5 3.3 3.5 3.8 G 109 L 1 AC Compass White 10 3005 97 2.5 19.2 6.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 VG 102 E 4 Eclipse Black 11 2946 95 2.0 18.3 4.0 4.3 1.0 1.3 E 108 M 14 Etna Cranberry 12 2935 95 2.0 58.9 1.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 VG 95 E 13 Hime Otebo 13 2861 93 1.8 29.9 4.8 2.3 4.3 4.3 P 102 M 11 Jet Black Black 14 2611 85 2.3 21.6 6.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 VG 113 L Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3088 2.0 24.6 4.5 3.2 2.6 2.7 107 Lodging: 1 = straight up 5 = flat C.V. 9.8 22.0 3.7 23.6 30.3 23.9 22.5 1.4 +&- 1/2 the LSD of Yield PR > F 0.046 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05 359 n/a 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.7 2 Maturity: <105=E, 105-107=M, >107= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.1=Excellent, 2.1-3.3=VeryGood,3.4-4.0=Good, >4.0= Poor Site Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: 54-40-45 NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3-12- 3 actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Oct. 8 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 29

09DVCAT Ontario Coloured Bean Variety Registration and Performance Major Thorndale Seed 100 Seed Treatment Market Treatment Yield Yield Quality Weight Days to Marsh Number Class Name Rank (kg/ha) (1-5) (g) Maturity Spot (%) 1 DRK Montcalm 4 2418 1.8 60.6 102 Check 2 DRK AC Calmont 5 2328 1.6 60.1 102 Check 3 DRK Red Hawk 9 1645 1.9 59.2 98 4 DRK OAC Redstar 10 1565 2.0 62.7 102 5 DRK OAC Derkeller 7 1957 2.0 65.8 102 6 DRK Majesty 6 2240 1.7 73.0 103 7 DRK OAC 07-6D 1 2866 1.6 70.3 102 8 DRK GTS 104 3 2473 1.9 57.9 103 9 DRK HR 174-4239 2 2580 1.4 71.3 100 10 DRK SVS-700 8 1754 2.5 62.5 96 Average 2183 11 LRK AC Elk 6 1836 1.3 68.1 96 Check 12 LRK Red Kanner 3 2467 2.1 58.2 106 Check 13 LRK Pink Panther 4 2098 1.6 72.0 100 Check 14 LRK OAC Lyrik 8 1787 1.0 71.2 97 15 LRK OAC 06-L1 2 2554 2.2 65.7 98 16 LRK OAC 07-L1 1 2837 1.3 68.0 104 17 LRK HR190-4849 7 1828 2.2 66.6 102 18 LRK HR204-4265 5 1848 1.8 61.8 101 Average 2174 19 Cran Hooter 3 2305 1.8 68.4 103 Check 20 Cran Etna 4 1940 1.7 71.9 98 Check 21 Cran Red Rider 1 2540 1.1 61.6 102 22 Cran HR 202-4973 2 2482 1.6 65.5 102 23 Cran HR 203-4979 5 1981 2.0 70.4 97 24 Cran Messina 6 1803 1.6 56.9 103 Average 2153 Mean 2172 1.7 65.4 100.7 C.V. 9.9 18.8 2.9 1.1 PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 253 0.4 2.3 1.4 Planting Date: June 5 Herbicide: Reflex @ 1 L/ha July 7 Harvest Dates: September 11 & 18 Fungicide: Headline @ 0.4 L/ha July 30 Yields adjusted to 18 % moisture. Insecticide: Cygon 1.0 L/ha July 30 Seeding Rate 17 seeds / m Seed Quality: 1=good 5=poor Insecticide: CruiserMaxx Bean @ 195 ml/100 kg of seed Design: Nearest Neighbour Dynasty 20 g./100 kg of seed Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Fertilizer: N (28%) @ 85 kg actual N / ha May 25 Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200 ml/ha May 25 Plot Length: 5 metres Frontier 1.25 L/ha May 25 Harvest Length: 4 metres Prowl 2.5 L/ha May 25 30

09DVPAT Kidney and Cranberry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial Thorndale Seed 100 Seed Treatment Treatment Market Yield Yield Quality Weight Days to Marsh Number Name Class (kg/ha) Rank (1-5) (g) Maturity Spot (%) 1 Red Kanner LRK 3215 18 1.7 54.6 111 2 CORN 18-V96 LRK 3432 10 1.4 55.4 108 3 CORN 773-V98 LRK 2779 32 1.4 51.0 99 4 CORN 1062-V98 LRK 3018 24 1.4 65.0 102 5 Blush LRK 2984 25 1.8 67.7 103 6 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK 2939 26 1.2 75.3 102 7 ADML945138 LRK 3298 16 1.5 64.5 101 8 COB 472-03 DRK 3325 14 1.5 57.4 103 9 USDK-CBB-15 DRK 2524 34 1.6 58.3 100 10 COB 419X-03 DRK 2867 29 1.5 57.4 103 11 ADMD107271 DRK 2808 30 2.2 62.4 101 12 Majesty DRK 3429 11 1.7 72.2 102 13 filler (Black Jet) Black 3745 4 1.8 23.7 114 14 Etna Cran 2877 28 2.0 66.6 97 15 ADMC213259 Cran 2783 31 2.0 62.7 102 16 ADMC000117 Cran 3128 20 2.1 72.4 103 17 SEM0928 Cran 3039 23 1.7 74.4 102 18 SEM0929 Cran 2915 27 1.8 72.3 96 19 Capri Cran 3060 22 2.1 67.0 104 20 Crimson (BD 1003) Cran 3205 19 2.0 72.6 102 21 HR 168B Cran 3110 21 2.0 74.2 106 22 HR 167 Cran 3675 7 1.6 67.5 105 23 T9905 Navy 3741 5 1.6 23.4 109 24 Condor Black 4003 2 1.3 20.5 109 25 Merlot SRM 3574 8 1.7 38.8 103 26 Sedona Pink 3485 9 1.7 39.1 102 27 Beluga WK 3386 13 1.2 59.6 102 28 filler (ISB 519W) WK 3714 6 1.1 51.1 114 29 Erimo Adzuki 2557 33 2.7 12.5 119 30 Hime Otebo 3311 15 1.4 32.0 104 31 Fuji Otebo 3393 12 1.1 30.0 106 32 Peruano Yellow 3295 17 1.2 45.8 109 33 SEM0863 Yellow 3942 3 1.6 41.8 111 34 PT 99195MR Pinto 4031 1 1.7 36.4 105 35 AC Harosprout Mung MP 36 HDC Exp #1 Mung MP Messina Cran Mean 3245 1.6 53.7 105 C.V. 7.7 17.9 4.2 2.1 PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(0.05) 295 0.3 2.6 2.5 Planting Date: June 5 Herbicide: Reflex @ 1 L/ha July 7 Harvest Dates: September 11, 18 & 24 Fungicide: Headline @ 0.4 L/ha July 30 Yields adjusted to 18 % moisture. Insecticide: Cygon 1.0 L/ha July 30 Seeding Rate 17 & 20 seeds / m Seed Quality: 1=good 5=poor Insecticide: CruiserMaxx Bean @ 195 ml/100 kg of seed Design: Nearest Neighbour, removed Rep 1 in analysis Dynasty 20 g./100 kg of seed Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Fertilizer: N (28%) @ 85 kg actual N / ha May 25 Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200 ml/ha May 25 Plot Length: 5 metres Frontier 1.25 L/ha May 25 Harvest Length: 4 metres Prowl 2.5 L/ha May 25 31

Sand and Sandy Loam Strip Trial Objective Evaluate different bean types using a strip trial format. Sand and Sandy loam soils present unique challenges for growers. Upright top yielding varieties from the plot trials were selected for each DRK, Pinto, White, Black, Adzuki, Cranberry Type. A top yielding soybean variety was used for comparison between types. A mung bean variety was also included due to it s ability to deal well with the lighter ground. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field-like conditions. The two trials were stacked back to back with the soils changing from a sandy loam to a coarse sand. Background Cooperator: Mike Donnelly-Vanderloo Planting Date: May 28/2009 County: Middlesex Seeding Rate: 6 seeds/ft. Soil Type: Huron and Perth Clay Loam Row Width: 30 inch Tillage: No-Till Herbicides: Pre- Dual&Roundup, Post- Assure,Reflex&BasagranRival Soil Test: N/A Harvest Date: Sept 17 / 2009 Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual 64.5-23-30 NPK Previous Crop: Corn Methods This trial was planted with a JD air seeder with a variety in each unit. Each strip was approx. 200 feet in length centered off the head lands. Four reps. of 4 metres were cut and bagged. These bagged plants were spread out to dry, combined and analysed. A yield was calculated based on these weights. Results Sandy Loam General Comments: * there was a lot of white mold pressure on all the varieties however there seemed to be a lot of plant damage to the Etnas at harvest. * the Mung Beans stand was non existent on the loam soils due planting too deep * the Etna could have been harvested earlier to reduce some split pods. Sand General Comments: * the Mung Beans were relatively flat compared to the other types. * there was a considerable amount of very late maturing Erimo plants that did not yield. 32

Sandy Loam Yield Entry Entry Lbs Per Ac. No. Name (18.0% moisture) 1 Dark Red Kidney (Majesty) 2159 d 2 Mung Bean (HDC #1) n/a 3 Pinto (La Paz) 3368 a 4 White (T9905) 2934 b 5 Black (Black Jet) 2475 cd 6 Adzuki (Erimo) 2077 d 7 Soybean (S10-B7) 2664* c 8 Cranberry (Etna) 2304 d LSD (P=.05) 399 CV 10.4 Grand Mean 2592 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 Sandy Soil Yield Entry Entry Lbs Per Ac. No. Name (18.0% moisture) 1 Dark Red Kidney (Majesty) 1411 b 2 Mung Bean (HDC #1) 714 c 3 Pinto (La Paz) 1994 a 4 White (T9905) 2016 a 5 Black (Black Jet) 1740 a 6 Adzuki (Erimo) 783 c 7 Soybean (S10-B7) 1909* a 8 Cranberry (Etna) 1379 b LSD (P=.05) 308 CV 13.9 Grand Mean 1508 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 * standard moisture was set at 13% Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. 33

Cranberry Dry Bean Strip Trial Objective Evaluate the new cranberry type dry bean variety Crimson (BS 1003) in a strip trial format. Etna was used as the standard for comparison. In previous Preliminary Yield variety Trials Crimson has yielded consistently among the top varieties. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field like conditions. Background Cooperator: Brad Martin Planting Date: June 24 2009 County: Middlesex Seeding Rate: 69,000 seeds/ac. Soil Type: Sandy Loam Row Width: 30 inch Tillage: Ploughed, cultivated 2x Herbicides: Pre Treflan,Eptam,Pursuit Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual 91 38 60 NPK Harvest Date: hand harvested Oct 15 Previous Crop: Corn Methods A White 6100 planter units was used to plant the the Crimson strips within the field of Etnas. Four representative random samples were hand harvested, bagged and threshed with an Almaco 40 plot combine. Results Cool and wet conditions throughout the growing season provided excellent conditions for white mold. While the yields were excellent considering the year the seed quality suffered. The harvested seed was also appraised by a grader from Cooks and seemed to follow the Seed Quality rating in the chart below. Crimson had higher pick and lower seed quality however the seed quality was still acceptable. Martin Strip Trial Entry Name YIELD (cwt) 100 seed wt (g.) Pick % Seed Quality* Etna 14.9 b 70.9 b 14 b 2.9 a Crimson 16.2 a 75.6 a 18 a 3.3 a LSD (P=.05) 1.5 3.3 3 0.4 CV 2.2 2.0 9.5 5.8 Grand Mean 31 73.3 16 3.1 Treatment Prob(F) 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. *Seed Quality (1-5, 1= excellent and 5 = small, discoloured and/or shriveled seed coat) 34

White Bean Dry Bean Strip Trial Objective Evaluate two new white dry bean varieties Medalist and Reliant in a strip trial format. Thunder was used as the standard for comparison. In previous Variety Trials these two new varieties have yielded consistently among the top varieties. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field-like conditions. Background Cooperator: Marwood Willis Planting Date: June 14/2009 County: Huron Seeding Rate: 172,500 plants/ac. Soil Type: Huron and Perth Clay Loam Row Width: 15 inch Tillage: Ploughed, cultivated 2x Herbicides: PPI Pursuit&Rival Soil Test: N/A Harvest Date: Sept 25 / 2009 Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual 24.5-13.1-12.8 NPK and 1.22 Previous Crop: Soybeans of Zinc Methods This trial was planted with a JD 8300 with every other unit plugged. Each strip was.55 acres in size centered off the head lands. The strips were harvested using a JD 6600 and placed in totes. These totes were taken and weighed at the local Kirkton Cooks. A yield was calculated based on these weights. Pick numbers determined by the graders is also included. Results Early in the growing season Thunder emerged the quickest with excellent early vigour. There were no obvious height differences by July. Cool and wet conditions throughout the growing season provided conditions excellent for white mold and anthracnose. The Thunder and Reliant seemed to be the hardest hit of the three varieties for White Mold. The final yield numbers (see table 1) show a large clear advantage for Thunder. Table #1 Kirkton White Bean Strip Trial Variety Moisture Pick Yield Name (%) (lbs/ac.) Thunder 20.9 2.0 2649 Medalist 23.7 4.3 2036 Reliant 23.8 8.6 1938 Average 22.8 5.0 2208 35

Visual Quality Survey Summary 2007-2009 (Black Bean Varieties) Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Colour Shape Size Dullness Shiney 1 COOP00044 (Loreto) AmeriSeed ######## ***** * **** *** 2 COOP05222 AmeriSeed #### **** ** ** 3 CORN96-148 Cornell ######## * **** ***** 4 Eclipse NDSSD ####### ** * * 5 Condor MSU ###### * *** **** 6 Black Velvet Seminis ######### ** ** ** ***** 7 ADMB201240 (Shania) ADM ######### * **** ***** ** 9 MSUB04554 (Zorro) MSU ######## *** * * **** 10 COB 214-99 Gen-Tec #### ** * ** ** 11 Blackjack 1 Gen-Tec ####### * ** ***** ***** 12 Jet Black Patterson (Idaho Bean) ##### ** * * selected in the top 10 by 8 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks, Patterson's Elevator,Fieldcrest) that had the variety in their top 10 list (max ########) for 2007,2008 & 2009 * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top 5 for that criteria 1 Blackjack was the top variety in 2007 rated #1 for colour,size and shape however in 2008 & 2009 due strictly to it's purple hue (evident at Blyth as well) it was near the bottom. Determining whether the purple hue of the black was a 1 year in 3 or 5 or 10 year event will only become evident with data from multiple years. Note: This data is a summary of only 3 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 15 inch rows (1 seed every 2 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 36

Visual Quality Survey Summary 2007-2009 (Cran. Bean Varieties) Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Colour Size White Red 1 Hooter Seminis ###### ** ***** ****** 2 HR 167-4099 AAFC Harrow #### *** *** ****** 3 HR 168-4246B AAFC Harrow ######## ******** ******* ********* 4 HR 163-4099 (Red Rider) SeCan ## ** *** 5 filler (Messina) Rogers 6 filler (October) SSE ######### ******** ****** **** 7 Etna 1 Seminis ###### ****** ** *** 8 ADMC213259 ADM ###### ***** ****** ** 9 ADMC000117 ADM 10 Capri MSU * *** 11 BD 1003 (Crimson) Basin Seeds ### ** ** ** selected in the top 10 by 6 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks,,Fieldcrest,Harrow Research Station) that had the variety in their top 10 list for 2007-2009 * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top 5 for that criteria 1 Etna was a top variety in 2008 &2009 rated among the top varieties for colour,size and shape however in 2007 the early maturing varieties (eg.etna ) could not rebound from early season drought conditions. Determing whether this was a 1 year in 3 or 5 or 10 year event will only become evident with data from multiple years Etna in the past been known for it's higher visual seed quality. Note: This data is a summary of only 3 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 30 inch rows (1 seed every 2.7 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 37

Summary of 2008 & 2009 Navy Bean Varieties Visual Ranking Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Overall Thunder Lightning Rex OAC Dublin (05-2) OAC 06-2 OAC 07-2 OAC 07-3 OAC 07-4 OAC 09-1 OAC 09-2 OAC 09-3 OAC 09-4 AC Compass Nautica AC Mast AC Cruiser HR177-3719 HR193-3931 HR199-4587 HR200-4345 HR205-4457 HR206-4170 Vista Reliant Viscount Gts 544 Gts 564 T9905 T9903 T10303 T10501 T10601 HY4181 T10307 Cirrus MSUN05324 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) COOP02084 COOP03019 COOP 02098 COOP 99039-3 ADM5027557 ADM5039540 COB 3785-03 Avalanche ADMN5059541 ADMN5058573 SEM1010 OAC(SeCan) OAC(HDC) OAC(GCBC) OAC(Bolton&Rosebank) OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC Cook's SeCan Advantage HDC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC Gentec Gentec Gentec Gentec Gentec Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland MSU AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed ADM ADM Gen-Tec NDSU ADM ADM Seminis indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks, W.G.Thompsons) that had the variety in their top list Note: This data is a summary of only 2 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 15 inch rows (1 seed every 2.0 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 38

2008-09 DRK Coloured Bean Varieties Summary Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Size Montcalm Public ## * AC Calmont GCBC # * Red Hawk Hyland ## * OAC Redstar OAC * OAC 05-D2 OAC ### * ** Majesty HDC ** OAC 07-D1 OAC # * * OAC 07-6D1 OAC # ** GTS 104 Gentec # * * HR 174-4239 AAFC Harrow * SVS-700 Hyland # * COB 474-03 Gentec ### *** * COB 472-03 Gentec #### *** * Fiero WSU ADM000264 ADM ## * USDK-CBB-15 ARS #### *** * selected in the top 5 by 3 or more elevators 39

2008-09 LRK Coloured Bean Varieties Summary Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Size AC Elk AAFC Harrow ## Red Kanner Hyland ### **** Pink Panther Seminis # * ** OAC Lyrik OAC # * * OAC 06-L1 OAC OAC 07-L1 OAC #### *** ** CORN 18-V96 Cornell ### ****** CORN 773-V98 Cornell # ** CORN 1062-V98 Cornell * * Blush WSU ##### *** *** SEM07146 (Clouseau) Seminis ## * **** selected in the top 5 by 3 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC,WG Thompsons) that had the variety in their top 5 list * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top grouping 40

Top Level Varieties in the R&P and PYT Trials Type Trial Yields Visual Appraisals Thorndale Kippen Blyth Kippen LRK R&P OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 06-L1 *** PYT CORN 18-V96 ** CORN 18-V96 ** Red Kanner *** CORN 773-V98 ** ADML945138 W Blush *** CORN 1062-V98 ** CORN 18-V96 *** ADML95138 W DRK R&P OAC 07-6D1 *** OAC 07-6D1 *** OAC Derkeller (05-D2) *** HR174-4239 *** Majesty ** GTS104 ** OAC Derkeller (05-D2) ** PYT COB 472-03 ** ADMD107271 W COB 472-03 *** COB 474-03 *** USDK-CBB-15 *** CRAN R&P HR 167-4099 *** Hooter *** Hooter *** HR 202-4973 W HR 167-4099 * Etna *** HR 168-4246B *** PYT Crimson (BD1003) *** Crimson (BD1003) *** ADMC213259 *** ADMC000117 ** October *** BLACK PYT Zorro *** Zorro *** Zorro *** COB 214-99 ** COOP05222 *** Black Velvet *** Loreto (COOP00044) ** Black Velvet *** Loreto (COOP00044) *** Black Velvet ** COB 214-99 ** Shania *** Shania ** Loreto (COOP00044) ** CORN96-148 *** COOP05222 ** Shania ** White R&P OAC 7-2 *** AC Compass *** OAC Compass *** Thunder *** OAC Thunder ** Thunder *** OAC 07-3 ** OAC Rex ** OAC Dublin (05-2) ** Reliant ** AC Mast ** HR199-4587 ** OAC Dublin (05-2) * OAC Dublin (05-2) ** GTS 544 * GTS # 564 * AC Cruiser ** T9905 * Lightning * T9903 * T10303 * OAC 07-3 * T10307 * OAC 09-4 * PYT HMS Medalist ** HMS Medalist *** Avalanche * ***-- excellent variety over a number of years ** -- excellent variety over a more limited number of years * -- above average variety over a number of years W---- excellent for only one year 41

PMR REPORT # SECTION J: CEREAL, FORAGE, AND OILSEED CROPS CROP: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. OAC Rex, T9905, Red Hawk, Etna NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, DEPUYDT, D and WILLIS, S. Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) 674-1632 Fax: (519) 674-1600 Email: cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca TITLE: EVALUATION OF QUADRIS AND HEADLINE TO INCREASE YIELDS WHEN DISEASE PRESSURE IS NOT PRESENT WITH AND WITHOUT DEFOLIATION DAMAGE IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS AT THE HURON RESEARCH STATION 2009 MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% + 1.12%); HEADLINE (pyraclostrobin 100g ai/ha); QUADRIS 250 SC (azoxystrobin 125g ai/ha). METHODS: The seed for the experiments was treated with Cruiser Max Beans, at label rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. The experiment was planted June 1, 2009 using a four row conemounted planter mounted on a John Deere Max Emerge planter. The seeding rate was 20 seeds per metre of row for the white bean varieties and 17 seeds for the large seeded kidney and cranberry beans. An experimental unit contained 4 rows 0.75 m apart, 6 m in length, arranged in an RCBD design with 4 replications. All of the assessments and yields were obtained from a harvest area 4 m long and 2 rows wide. The experiment was divided into two that being either hailed or left untreated. The simulated hail was performed at the crops 1 st flower, and was accomplished with and Echo weed trimmer with string attachment the Headline/Quadris treatment was then applied the next day. All the hailed treatments were defoliated about 50%. The spray treatments were applied once during the growing season, when a single flower was present on the majority of plants in that variety. The experiments were hailed on July 28 th & sprayed on July 29th (58 DAP) for the Red Hawk and Etna and August 4 th and 5 th (65 DAP) for the white bean varieties. The spray was applied using a CO 2 pressurized sprayer with a three 10002 Airbubble nozzles spaced at 50 cm, at 277 kpa (40 psi) in 200 L/ha water. The treatments were assessed for any disease and notes were made before harvest. The Etna experiments (non-hailed/hailed) were harvested on September 11 th and September 25 th. Red Hawks were harvested on September 15 th and the 25 th. The non-hailed T9905 were harvested on September 24 th with the remaining white bean experiments being harvested on October 8 th. Visual seed quality was determined using a scale of 1-5 (1 = excellent seed quality, 5 = poor seed quality). Seed weight was determined by recording the weight of 100 randomly selected seed from each plot. Pick percentage (discoloured and/or misshapen seed) were calculated for each plot. Yield and seed weights were adjusted to the standard storage moisture of 18%. RESULTS: See Tables 1-8. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen in yield with or without the use of Headline or Quadris in combination with defoliating of the canopy in these eight experiments (Table 1-8). 42

Table 1. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (OAC Rex) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 21.6 1.8 2.3 2523 2463 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 21.8 1.3 3.4 2501 2418 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 21.8 1.6 3.4 2357 2276 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 21.4 1.6 2.6 2323 2261 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 22.0 1.6 2.5 2336 2277 Mean 21.7 1.6 2.8 2409 2339 C.V. 1.9 17.6 39.7 9.6 9.1 PR>F 0.46 0.18 0.55 0.61 0.56 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 2. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (OAC Rex) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 21.7 1.6 3.1 1681 1629 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 21.8 1.8 2.1 1628 1596 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 21.8 1.6 2.7 1617 1575 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 21.6 1.5 3.1 1904 1846 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 21.6 1.6 2.7 1764 1718 Mean 21.7 1.6 2.7 1719 1673 C.V. 2.4 14.6 29.8 11.0 11.4 PR>F 0.97 0.70 0.40 0.25 0.30 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43

Table 3. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (T9905) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 23.4 2.4 1.1 2823 2793 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 23.3 2.0 0.8 2890 2867 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 23.5 1.9 0.8 2861 2839 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 23.2 2.3 1.2 2807 2776 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 23.1 2.3 1.2 2704 2672 Mean 23.3 2.2 1.0 2817 2789 C.V. 2.8 21.3 79.7 10.5 10.9 PR>F 0.89 0.55 0.92 0.92 0.91 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 4. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (T9905) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 22.8 1.5 1.1 2417 2392 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 22.2 1.9 1.8 2275 2231 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 23.0 1.8 1.6 2451 2412 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 23.0 1.9 1.0 2369 2345 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 22.8 1.8 1.2 2295 2268 Mean 22.7 1.8 1.3 2361 2329 C.V. 4.4 25.2 61.7 8.5 8.1 PR>F 0.30 0.75 0.57 0.69 0.62 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 44

Table 5. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Kidney Beans (Redhawk) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 48.4 1.8 2.7 1969 1918 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 47.8 1.8 1.8 1978 1946 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 48.0 1.8 0.9 2049 2033 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 48.4 1.6 1.7 1662 1633 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 48.3 1.6 0.6 2223 2211 Mean 48.2 1.7 1.5 1976 1948 C.V. 2.1 17.2 91.8 15.9 16.4 PR>F 0.83 0.92 0.28 0.22 0.21 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 6. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Kidney Beans (Redhawk) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 48.3 1.5 0.9 1406 1394 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 48.7 1.4 0.9 1465 1454 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 47.5 1.5 0.8 1459 1448 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 47.9 1.4 0.9 1271 1259 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 48.1 1.4 0.4 1600 1594 Mean 48.1 1.4 0.8 1440 1430 C.V. 2.6 13.2 67.8 22.0 22.1 PR>F 0.72 0.72 0.67 0.69 0.68 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45

Table 7. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Cranberry Beans (Etna) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 48.8 2.0 3.9 2047 1966 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 47.7 2.0 2.0 1842 1816 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 49.1 2.0 1.8 2042 2003 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 49.5 1.4 1.9 1991 1952 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 49.5 1.6 1.1 2166 2143 Mean 48.9 1.8 2.1 2017 1976 C.V. 4.4 26.2 94.2 11.3 10.8 PR>F 0.76 0.27 0.39 0.42 0.36 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 8. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Cranberry Beans (Etna) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario 2009. Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check 53.7 1.4 0.6 1784 1772 2 Headline (Half Rate) 50 53.6 1.3 0.7 1743 1731 3 Headline (Full Rate) 100 53.2 1.5 0.5 1786 1778 4 Quadris (Half Rate) 62.5 52.4 1.4 0.6 1653 1644 5 Quadris (Full Rate) 125 53.3 1.5 0.6 1793 1793 Mean 53.3 1.4 0.6 1743 1743 C.V. 3.8 14.9 77.8 13.3 13.3 PR>F 0.90 0.44 0.98 0.89 0.89 LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46

TITLE: EVALUATION OF MARSH SPOT IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS VARIETY TRIALS 2009 (THORNDALE, KIPPEN, MONKTON, ELORA AND ST. THOMAS) CROP: PEST: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. as per treatment Marsh Spot NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, WILLIS, S. and DEPUYDT, D Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) 674-1632 Fax: (519) 674-1600 Email: cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% + 1.12%) METHODS: Cranberry beans are prone to a disorder known as marsh spot, which discolours the interior of the cotyledon and can create marketing issues. Seed samples were collected from the Ontario Dry Bean Performance Trials to determine if any of the cranberry varieties are susceptible to Marsh Spot. These varieties were compared to Messina, a highly susceptible variety of cranberry beans, which was also seeded at each location. Seed was treated with DCT and Cruiser 5FS at registered rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. Five locations were planted across southern Ontario; Thorndale, Kippen, Monkton, Elora and St. Thomas. The experiments were part of the Ontario dry bean variety registration and performance trials. The experiments were arranged as a RCBD design with 4 replications. Samples of seed harvested from these experiments were sent to the Huron Research Station, and scored for marsh spot incidence and severity. Fifty seeds were split and each half was rated for marsh spot incidence. The percentage incidence was then calculated for each variety. If Marsh Spot was present, its severity was visually rated on a scale of one to five, using the standards found in Figure 1. RESULTS: See Tables 1-5. CONCLUSIONS: Marsh spot scores for cranberry bean varieties at the five locations are presented in Tables 1-5. Marsh spot occurred at each location, with the St. Thomas location having the highest incidence x severity (I x S) scores with a four fold increase over the next highest. HR 203-4979 was the same (4 locations) and significantly worst than Messina at Thorndale. had an average incidence of 11.9%, which was significantly worst than any other variety in all the trials. The commercial varieties of Etna and Hooter had consistently low marsh spot incidence except at the St. Thomas location. 47

Figure 1: Marsh Spot Severity Ratings 48

Table 1: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Thorndale, Ontario. 2009. Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.8 b 0.6 b 0.01 cd 2 Etna 3.5 b 1.7 a 0.07 bc 3 Red Rider 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.00 d 4 HR 202-4973 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 d 5 HR 203-4979 22.8 a 1.9 a 0.40 a 6 Messina 4.0 b 1.9 a 0.09 b Mean 5.2 1.1 0.09 C.V. 53.4 54.4 44.6 PR>F 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD(.05) 4.2 0.9 0.06 Table 2: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Kippen, Ontario 2009. Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.00 b 2 Etna 0.5 bc 0.5 ab 0.00 b 3 Red Rider 0.3 c 0.3 b 0.00 b 4 HR 202-4973 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.00 b 5 HR 203-4979 3.6 ab 1.1 a 0.06 a 6 Messina 5.5 a 1.1 a 0.07 a Mean 1.64 0.5 0.02 C.V. 125.9 98.3 135.2 PR>F 0.01 0.01 0.01 LSD(.05) 3.1 0.7 0.05 49

Table 3: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Monkton, Ontario 2009. Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.5 0.5 0.01 2 Etna 5.8 1.0 0.09 3 Red Rider 0.5 0.4 0.01 4 HR 202-4973 4.3 0.4 0.07 5 HR 203-4979 7.3 1.0 0.09 6 Messina 10.0 1.4 0.20 Mean 4.7 0.8 0.08 C.V. 146.5 113.3 160.2 PR>F 0.36 0.56 0.35 LSD(.05) N/A N/A N/A Table 4: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Elora, Ontario 2009. Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 2 Etna 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 3 Red Rider 1.3 b 0.9 ab 0.03 b 4 HR 202-4973 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.00 b 5 HR 203-4979 6.0 a 1.6 a 0.10 a 6 Messina 5.0 a 1.6 a 0.08 a Mean 2.1 0.7 0.03 C.V. 57.2 90.1 70.6 PR>F 0.00 0.01 0.00 LSD(.05) 1.8 1.0 0.04 50

Table 5: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from St. Thomas, Ontario 2009. Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 22.0 abc 2.3 0.53 ab 2 Etna 20.5 bc 1.9 0.52 ab 3 Red Rider 9.8 cd 2.0 0.21 bc 4 HR 202-4973 4.3 d 1.9 0.06 c 5 HR 203-4979 31.0 ab 1.8 0.58 a 6 Messina 35.0 a 1.8 0.62 a Mean 20.4 1.9 0.42 C.V. 43.8 38.3 56.5 PR>F 0.00 0.95 0.02 LSD(.05) 13.5 N/A 0.36 51

TITLE: EVALUATION OF MARSH SPOT IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS PRELIMINARY YIELD TRIALS 2009 (THORNDALE AND KIPPEN) CROP: PEST: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. as per treatment Marsh Spot NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, WILLIS, S. and DEPUYDT, D Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) 674-1632 Fax: (519) 674-1600 Email: cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% + 1.12%) METHODS: Cranberry beans are prone to a disorder known as marsh spot, which discolours the interior of the cotyledon and can create marketing issues. Seed samples were collected from the Preliminary Yield Trials to determine if any of the varieties are susceptible to marsh spot. The varieties were compared to Messina, a highly susceptible variety of cranberry beans, which was also seeded at each location. Seed was treated with CRUISER MAXX BEANS at registered rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. The two Preliminary Yield Trial locations were Thorndale and Kippen. The experiments were arranged as a RCBD design with 4 replications. Samples of seed harvested from these experiments were sent to the Huron Research Station, and scored for marsh spot incidence and severity. Fifty seeds were split and each half was rated for marsh spot incidence. The percentage incidence was then calculated for each variety. If marsh spot was present, its severity was visually rated on a scale of one to five, using the standards found in Figure 1. RESULTS: See Tables 1-2 CONCLUSIONS: Marsh spot scores for the two locations are presented in Tables 1-2. Messina and to a lesser extent BD 1004 are considered susceptible checks for marsh spot. Marsh spot incidence was not considered high at these locations in 2009. At the Thorndale site (Table 1), Crimson had the highest (I x S) score followed by SEM0928, Messina and the remaining varieties. At the Kippen location, Crimson had the highest I x S score, followed by ADMC213259 and Messina (Table 2). The remaining varieties had very low scores. 52

Figure 1: Marsh Spot Severity Ratings 53

2024 © cuisinedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback