(Camellia sinensis L.) in Darjeeling Hill

Similar documents
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRUNING TIMES ON THE YIELD OF TEA (Camellia sinensis L.) UNDER THE CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF MANSEHRA-PAKISTAN

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

To study the effects of four different levels of fertilizer NPK nutrients, applied at a ratio of N:P 2

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

LOWER HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

DARJEELING TEA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE

Effect of Sowing Time on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn Cultivars

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

What Went Wrong with Export Avocado Physiology during the 1996 Season?

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

IMPACT OF RAINFALL PRIOR TO HARVEST ON RIPE FRUIT QUALITY OF HASS AVOCADOS IN NEW ZEALAND

D Lemmer and FJ Kruger

Tea Research Foundation Central Africa

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Studies on effect of altitude and environment on physiological activities and yield of Darjeeling tea (Camellia sinensis L.

J. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources, 9(1): , 2016 ISSN

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

Regression Models for Saffron Yields in Iran

2012 Estimated Acres Producers Estimated Production Units Estimated Farm Value Farm Crawfish 182,167 1,251 90,973,725 Lbs.

R. Kumar*, Mahipal Singh and B. Bera 1

(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

THE GROWTH OF THE CHERRY OF ROBUSTA COFFEE

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

Module 6. Yield and Fruit Size. Presenter: Stephan Verreynne

THE EFFECT OF GIRDLING ON FRUIT QUALITY, PHENOLOGY AND MINERAL ANALYSIS OF THE AVOCADO TREE

Influence of Changes Weather Conditions on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Darjeeling Tea (Camellia sinensis L.)

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

EFFECTS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND CONTROLLED FRUITING ON COTTON YIELD

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Citrus: World Markets and Trade

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

EFFICACY OF MURIATE OF POTASH AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH FUNGTCIDES TO CONTROL RED RUST DISEASE (Cephaleurous parasiticus) OF TEA

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Materials and Methods

Measurement and Study of Soil ph and Conductivity in Grape Vineyards

Optimum Plant Population Density for Chickpea In a Semiarid Environment

The Implications of Climate Change for the Ontario Wine Industry

To study the effect of microbial products on yield and quality of tea and soil properties

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

ANALYSIS OF CLIMATIC FACTORS IN CONNECTION WITH STRAWBERRY GENERATIVE BUD DEVELOPMENT

EFFECT OF CURING AND SEAL PACKAGING ON PEEL AND PULP WEIGHT LOSS PERCENTAGE OF SCUFFING DAMAGED AND UNDAMAGED CITRUS FRUIT.

Study of Forage Productivity and Chemical Composition of Winter Vetch (Vicia villosa R.) under Optimization of the Factors of Sowing Time and Rate

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

(Potato) Chips (GB: Crisps), A Product Description

Specific mediterranean characteristics. Mediterranean climate

Irrigation of Sunflowers in Northwestern Kansas

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

Potential of Three Tropical Legumes for Rotation of Corn-Based Cropping System in Thailand

ECONOMICS OF COCONUT PRODUCTS AN ANALYTICAL STUDY. Coconut is an important tree crop with diverse end-uses, grown in many states of India.

Dragon Fruit - Hylocereus undatus

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

P. Okinda Owuor; Department of Chemistry, Maseno University, Private Bag, Maseno, Kenya

CHATEAU CHEVAL BLANC SAINT-ÉMILION - FRANCE TÉL : 33 (0)

Factors influencing incidence of red spider mite of tea, Oligonychus coffeae (Nietner) in Assam

Cultivation Pattern:

Discrimination of Ruiru 11 Hybrid Sibs based on Raw Coffee Quality

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Analysis of Bunch Quality in Oil Palm Hybrid Cross Combinations under Krishna-Godavari Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

Physiology, Orchard Establishment, Cultivars, Training/Pruning. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

1

Fruit Set, Growth and Development

EFFECT OF CULTURAL MANIPULATION OF "MUMMY" WALNUTS ON WINTER SURVIVAL OF NAVEL ORANGEWORM

CHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS?

Harvest Aids in Soybeans - Application Timing and Value. J.L. Griffin, C.A. Jones, L.M. Etheredge, Jr., J. Boudreaux, and D.Y.

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

Help in Addressing the Challenges to Entering the Vineyard and Winery Industry

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2013

Quality of western Canadian peas 2009

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2014

POTENTIAL OF THE LAND IN ARCHAR VILLAGE FOR CREATION OF VINES FOR QUALITY WINE GRAPE VARIETIES. CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC SPECIALITY OF THE TERROIR

LAKE ONTARIO BEAMSVILLE BENCH VINEMOUNT RIDGE STATISTICS

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT - Wine evaporation from barrels By Richard M. Blazer, Enologist Sterling Vineyards Calistoga, CA

Lesson 2 The Vineyard. From Soil to Harvest

VINTAGE REPORT. Debbie Lauritz SENIOR WINEMAKER. Marty Gransden VITICULTURALIST MEDIA RELEASE: APRIL, 2016

Notes on acid adjustments:

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Effects of Seedling Age, and Different Levels of N, K and K/N on Quality and Yield of Tomato Grown in Perlite Bag Culture

Effect on Quality of Cucumber (Pant Shankar Khira-1) Hybrid Seed Production under Protected Conditions

Transcription:

Manuscript Processing Details (dd/mm/yyyy) : Received : 09/09/2015 Accepted on : 16/09/2015 Published : 24/09/2015 Influence of Pruning Times on the Production of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) in Darjeeling Hill R. Kumar*, Mahipal Singh and B. Bera 1 Darjeeling Tea Research and Development Centre, Tea Board of India, A.B. Path, Kurseong 734203, Dist. - Darjeeling, (WB), India 1 Tea Board of India, 14, B. T. M. Sarani, Kolkata 700001, (W.B.), India *Corresponding Author's Email: rk.jayantdtrdc@yahoo.com Abstract The experiment was conducted at Experimental In addition, pruning leads to enhanced branching and Farm, Darjeeling Tea Research and Development Centre, hence it rejuvenates the tea plants resulting in a greater Kurseong during 2008-12 with the objectives to find out the number of tender leaves for healthier and better quality tea most suitable time for pruning of tea to get higher production plants. Cultivated tea plants are usually pruned to a height of Darjeeling tea cultivation. Old china tea bushes were Light pruned (LP) manually in the 3 rd of around 1 1.5 m to make crop maintenance and week of each month i.e. September, 2008; October, 2008; November, 2008; harvesting ( plucking ) easier and to increase yields. December, 2008; January, 2009 and February, 2009. The However, in their natural state, tea plants will grow to 1 st plucking on 10 th Jun, 2009 while the first plucking in the small trees. The Assam variety can grow into a loosely tea bushes pruned during January and February, 2009 was branched tree about 15 m tall. It is a lowland plant, and obtained on 3 rd July, 2009 with 22 days delay as compared to requires high rainfall and good drainage. The Chinese September, October, November and December pruning variety grows to a much smaller size, reaching a height of during the 1 st year of 5 year pruning cycle (LP-LOS-LS-MS- leaf was 2980.0 3 5 m. LS). The highest annual mean yield of green A lot of research has been done in an attempt to find the kg ha -1 recorded in the pruning time of December and lowest 2281.6 Kg ha -1 best time of pruning for maximum regrowth and these in September than other pruning time. Pruning in December gave 698.2 Kg ha -1 (23.43 %) and attempts have yielded varying results that could be 506.40 kg ha -1 (16.99 %) more fresh green tea leaves attributed to complex factors prevailing during pruning production per hectare as compared to September and time [6]. However, no work has been done on the effect of October pruning, respectively. It was found that the tea pruning time on tea regrowth and productivity. Root starch bushes pruned on December, 2008 recorded significantly the reserves play an important role in recovery of tea after highest number of Leaf area index (2.94 m -2 ), root Starch ( pruning [15]. The results showed that the minimum 2-3 17.46 %), No of shoots (363 m -2 ) and processed tea yield months of resting before pruning increased root reserves. (655.6kg ha -1 ) followed by January, 2009 pruning regarding The level of root reserves declined rapidly soon after these parameters, while the pruning on September, 2008 produced the minimum number of shoots (273 m -2 pruning. The replenishment of root reserves commenced ), leaf area index (2.15 m -2 ), fresh green tea leaves yield ( 2281.8 kg ha -1 ) only after two months from pruning and complete and processed tea (501.99 kg ha -1 ). A gradual decline was replenishment of root reserves occurred about 10 months observed in leaf area index; active shoots, number of after pruning. The speed of recovery from pruning of a plucking round and green leaves production in plots pruned bush depends on plant s starch reserves in the roots [13]. before December. Maximum shoot population density and The more starch reserves theree are, the faster will be the leaf area index were associated with higher tea production. recovery from the prune. Potassium deficiency, in On the basis of these findings, it can be concluded that the particular, has been shown to have a very marked effect on pruning activities of tea during December (Light Pruned) recovery. and January (Skiffed) gave the highest production of green The ideal temperature for growth is 18 30 C. Growth tea leaves under the climatic conditions of Darjeeling hill. is limited by temperatures above 32 35 C and below 12 Keywords Leaf Area Index, Pruning Times, Starch, Tea, 13 C. Strong winds, frequent frost, hail, and excessive Yield. rainfall are also detrimental to the production of high quality tea. Tea requires long hours of sunshine for good I. INTRODUCTIONN production. The ideal day length for vegetative growth is 11¼ hours. This means that tea can be harvested year The tea plants and seeds brought from china around round within 15 18 of the Equator. Outside this area, 1835 by Gordon who was a Botanist with East India dormancy will occur at a rate of 30 days for every Company were planted in Darjeeling district and some additional 3 5 from the Equator. Growth of tea plant is other parts of India. Subsequently, seeds were collected dependent on many factors i..e. inherent characteristics, from there sources and more and more areas were planted. soil climatic conditions, pest, diseases and crop husbandry They were China or China hybrid types and of low yield [12]. The quality of tea is affected by cultivars, potential. Pruning is an important agronomic practice and environment, cultural practices and tea processing it has been shown to be most importantt operation, next to techniques [5]. The objective of this experiment was to plucking, which directly determines the productivity and find out the most suitable time for pruning of tea to get quality of tea plantations. Pruning helps stimulate higher production of Darjeeling tea cultivation. vegetative growth and prevent reproductive growth phase. 301

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted at the experimental farm of the Darjeeling Tea Research & Development Centre, Kurseong which is located at Lat. 26.9 0 N, 88 0 12 E, altitude 1347 m during 2001 to 2011 on old chinary tea bushes, using 5 years (LP LOS LS - MS LOS) pruning cycle. The topography comprised of moderate slopes (25-30%). The top-soil is about 45 cm in depth and the sub soil is stony. The soil is an Umbric Dystrochrept, moderately permeable and moderately well drained having sandy loam, texture. The experiment was arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications and pruning time as a factor. The treatment were T1= 3 rd week of September 2008, T2= 3 rd week of October 2008, T3= 3 rd week of November 2008, T4= 3 rd week of December 2008, T5= 3 rd week of January 2009 and T6 = 3 rd week of February 2009. Climatic data is also recorded during the experiment period. Plants were subjected to water deficit from March to May and were without irrigation every year. The recommended dose of fertilizers i.e. N: P: K::90: 45: 90 Kg ha -1 through the mixture of Urea, Rock Phosphate and Muriate of potash were applied. The root sample was collected from the each plot for measuring the percent of root starch. Dip cut ends of pencil thick roots collected at random in Iodine solution. ( Iodine crystals 1 gm., potassium iodine 1 gm. in 12 ml of distilled water and shaking the container gently the diluted to 100 ml and stored in dark coloured bottle and kept away from light in the dark or Tincture iodine diluted 8 times).from each plot, leaf samples were collected for measuring Leaf Area Index (LAI). Sample size was 1 square meter. Leaf area was measured from the field using a portable area meter (Li-3000A, Li Cor, Nebraska, USA) as described (Li - Cor Inc., 1987). Leaf area index (LAI) is the total leaf area divided by the sample surface area. The harvested leaves comprised of young shoots, (normally two or three leaves) and a terminal bud, plucked at 7 days intervals (weekly) throughout the growth period. Shoot population were recorded weekly on the five bushes within a 0.30 X0.30 m -2 Quadrate placed at the centre of the bush. Data were recorded from 1 st plucking of 10 th June, 2009 and ceased in November, 2013, when plucking points reached a peak. Shoots of harvestable size were plucked and counted. The total fresh green leaf from each plot was weighed at each harvest and converted to the made tea equivalent using a constant value of 0.22 [1]. In the Darjeeling Hills, flushing of the tea crop starts at the end of March and after a sequence of production of normal leaves in April the shoot goes dormant for a short period during May. Thereafter, harvesting of the tea crop continues until September, declines considerably towards the end of October and then ceases during November until flushing starts again at the end of March. temperature of 3 0 C was recorded in January during the study. In winter season, light intensity was moderate, sunshine hours (5.0 h day -1 ) and relative humidity (89%) were high. Maximum precipitation was recorded during Jun to August and minimum in the month of November to February. Sunshine hours weree very low (below 2.0 h d -1 ) in rainy season. The minimumm (base) air temperature for shoot extension and development varies from clone to clone in the range of 7-15 0 C. Above the base temperature, the rates of extension and development are linear up to a maximum of about 30 35 0 C. Unlike extension growth, photosynthesis does not stop at 12 0 C. In Darjeeling, photosynthesis was observed to continue during winter (higher rate than summer and rains) when minimum temperature fall below 12 0 C and the tea bushes were dormant. In Darjeeling, higher rate of photosynthesis was recorded in cold and only 12.5% depression in comparison with autumn was observed [8]. Although shoot growth diminishes as the temperature falls and ceases below 12 0 C but photosynthesis accompanied by slow rate of respiration continues even at lower temperature. As a result, the bush gains in weight in a cool climate without concomitant increase in shoot weight. Plucking or harvesting of tea is the most important and costly operation of productivity of Darjeeling tea. The method of plucking affects the level of production, the quality and the health of the tea bush. Tea plants light pruned manually in the month of 3 rd week of September, 2008; 3 rd week of October, 2008; 3 rd week of November, 2008; 3 rd week of December, 2008 observed the early plucking while in 3 rd week of January, 2009 and 3 rd week of February, 2009 light pruning. The first plucking was recorded on 5 th Jun, 2009 while the first plucking in the tea bushes pruned during January and February, 2009 on 3 rd July, 2009 with 28 days delay as compared to September, October, November and December pruning during the 1 st year of 5 year pruning cycle (LP-LOS-LS-MS-LS).The effects of plucking frequency have also been studied. Plucking once a week producedd more plucking points than plucking twice a week, produced smaller shoots (1L + b, 2L+b and 3L+b)), slightly more dry matter as a proportion of fresh shoots and a lower weight of pruning per unit area, but gave significant yield differences in a five-year pruning cycle. III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION Mean maximum air temperature ranges from around 16 0 C in February to 27 0 C in July and minimum Photograph: Counting of shoot population during the study 302

Several reports have been given on optimal pruning season and variable results were obtained and it was concluded that pruning could be done at any time of the year[14]. However, in further experiments, significant yield differences were obtained due to height of pruning and time of pruning. Results from work carried out in 1971 and 1972 suggest that in Kericho, the best time of pruning is from October to February as long as the soil moisture level has not been depleted to such an extent that growth is limited[9]. Results presented on pruning times appear rather contradictory. This is mainly due to the difficulty of synchronising harvesting times, and to weather factors. Pruning in wet weather resulted in an increase in yield, demonstrating the possible benefits of timing pruning to coincide with wet weather or irrigation[10]. Irrigation helped tea recover from pruning. The effect of soil and bark temperatures and starch reserves in relation to time of pruning were determined[11]. Results on the starch reserves were not presented but pruning when the soil was warm and moisture was not limiting produced the best recovery. The results showed that the minimum 2-3 months of resting before pruning increased root reserves. The level of root reserves declined rapidly soon after pruning. The replenishment of root reserves commenced only after two months from pruning and complete replenishment of root reserves occurred about 10 months after pruning. The percentage of starch was highest in December month and lowest in September during the study(fig. 2). Maximum starch content of 17% was reached 5 years after pruning and after pruning age of 5 years starch content decreased to 13% in Darjeeling mid elevation. Considering the starch reserve in roots, December-January is the ideal time for pruning tea bushes in North East India while in Sri Lanka and East Africa, the period immediately following dry season is considered ideal for pruning [7]. season until low temperature once more began to dominate shoot extension number in November and no harvesting in winter season. The pruning time of December month showed the greatest variation with all peaks of 20 to 50 mm m -2 week -1 occurring during the summer (March to May) and rainy (June to July) season. In contrast, the pruning times of September and October month was lowest active shoot at that time (5 to 30 mm m -2 week -1 and did not exhibit such marked peaks in shoot extension activity except during the rainy season. In the cold weather season, shoot extension rate of all pruning times were zero (no shoot growth rates from December to February).The difference of active shoots population densities between pruning times were very marked. The pruning times of September, October and February month were lower (250 to 300 shoots m -2 )shoot numbers than December and January pruning times (300 to 380 shoots m -2 ). The maximum shoots numbers (363 m -2 ) was in the pruning time of December during the study (Table 2).The field observations were noticed that the density of dormant shoots is less during the periods of higher green leaf yield and high dormancy during periods of lower leaf yield. Although actively growing tea shoots on a harvested bush become dormant after producing 3-4 leaves, most of the new shoots growing after pruning, do not show a clear periodic growth at shorter intervals as observed on a tea bush in plucking.[4] also reported that shoots of pruned tea bushes produced more leaves before they become dormant. This could be attributed to less competition between shoots for nutrient and water and also the presence of growth hormones in adequate concentrations. The maximum plucking round was recorded in the pruning time of December month and minimum in September and October month of pruning times (Table 2).Leaf area index (LAI) is an important parameter in crop productivity. The LAI during the plucking stage of the tea bush is an important state variable in the recorded of the yield. Highest leaf area index was observed in the pruning month of December (2.94 m -2 ) followed by other pruning time s month (Table 2). LAI were recorded lowest in the pruning time of September and October and highest in pruning time of December. Photograph: Light Pruning (LP) of Darjeeling tea The time required by shoots to reach the harvestable size was less in March- April. Thereafter, fast growing shoots appeared in June. Shoots harvested during the July/August peak might be either the fast growing ones, released from apical dominance in June, or the remaining slow growing shoots that were initiated before three months. This Photograph: Experimental field diversity in shoot growth rates continued through the rainy 303

The tea is manufactured using tender shoots having few leaves with an apical bud. Shoots with one leaf, and shoots with more than three leaves are also included in the harvest. The highest green leaf production (2980.0 Kg ha - 1 ) was recorded in the pruning time of December followed by pruning of January, November and February with production of 2800.00, 2747.50 and 2544.00 Kg ha -1, respectively (Table 2). The annual average yield of processed tea was recorded 582.00 kg ha -1 and varied with times of pruning. Highest mean annual yield of processed tea was 655.60 Kg ha -1 recorded in the pruning time of December month and minimum (501.99 kg ha -1 ) in September (Fig. 1). The yield of processed tea from the pruning time of September and October were lower than other times of pruning months. Theree were differences between pruning times in the distribution of seasonal yield. Highest yield in all pruning times were recorded in rainy season. The variation in yield for different pruning times is due to the variation in date of first plucking, number of plucking point s m -2 and shoot growth, as these are the yield determinants of tea bush [2]. The timing, amount and location of their deposits should be investigated as a possible indicator to predict vigour and yield [3]. Pruning should be done when the root reserves are high. Pruning and or tipping have been shown to check root growth and development. Carbohydrate reserves are enhanced by cultural practices. IV. CONCLUSION From this study it was observed that pruning of tea under the climatic conditions of Darjeeling hill should be carried out in the dormant period. Mid November to December month for Deep/Light pruning and January month for Skiffing are the most suitable times for the pruning of tea plantations to get high productivity. The study was suggested that the pruning should be done when the root starch will be high. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the Chairman, Deputy Chairman and Director (Research) of the Tea Board of India for providing facilities and their generous support during the study. Computing assistance by Shri Sandip Roy and Smt. Aruna Lama of Darjeeling Tea Research and Development Centre is appreciated. [4] Carr, M.K.V. 2000. Shoot growth plus plucking equals profit. TRIT Occasional Publication No. 1,April 2000. Tea Research Institute of Tanzania, pp.1-7. [5] Chiu, W. 1990. Factors affecting the production andquality of partially fermented tea in Taiwan.Acta Hort. 275: 57-64. [6] Mphangwe N.I.K. 2012. Lung Pruning: A Review ofpractice. Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa (TRFCA) News.Pp 18-23. [7] Ghosh Hajra N. 2001. Tea cultivation: comprehensivetreatise (Lucknow, International Book DistributingCo.) pp. 520. [8] Ghosh Hajra N. and Kumar R. 2002b. Responses ofyoung tea clones to subtropical climate: Effects on photosynthetic and biological characteristics. J Plant Biol 29 (3): 257-264. [9] Othieno C.O. 1972. Time of pruning.tea Research Institute of East Africa Annual Report 1972,pp 22-29. [10] Othieno CO. 1983. Effect of weather recovery frompruning and yield of tea in Kenya. J. Plantati ion Crops(Supplement), 44-45. [11] Othieno C.O, Obaga S.M.O. and Odhiambo H.O. 1988. Soil and bark temperatures and starchres serves inrelation to time of pruning. Tea Research Foundation of Kenya AnnualReport 1988, pp. 121; [12] Rishiraj, D. 2011. Impact of age and management factors on tea yield and modelling in influence of leaf area index onyield variations.science Asia.37:83-87. [13] Tea research Institute of Tanzania (TRTI) (2006.Pruning and tipping.module 6. August 2004. Available online at http://www.trit.or.tz/training% %20modules/MODULE%20No%2 06%20Pruning.pdf.Accessed on 21/03/2013. [14] Templer J.C. 1973. Pruning in Toro district.tea in East Africa13(2), pp. 19-20. [15] Wijeratne M.A., Premathunga A., Karunaratne W.R.M.M. 2002). Variation of root starch reserves of tea and its impact on recovery after pruning. J. Plant. Crops (30), pp.33-3. AUTHOR'S PROFILE Rakesh Kumar was born on 08.12.1965.Passed M. Sc. (Ag) in Agricultural Chemistry in 1989 from Meerut University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. Joined as Assistant Teacher in 1989.Obtained B. Ed. (Ag) in 1992 from Regional College of Education Centre, Ajmer, Rajasthan (NCERT).Joined as Jr. Sc. Asstt. (Farm Management) in October, 1992 at Tea Board of India, Darjeeling Tea Research and Development Centree (DTRDC), Kurseong, Darjeeling, West Bengal.Now, working on plant physiology as a Scientific Officer at DTRDC since 2009. I have published more than 25 scientific papers in National and International reputed journals, and attended more than 10 National and International Conferences, and trained 25 Small Tea Growers of Darjeeling tea Industry, and contributed one technical bulletin of young tea management of Darjeeling tea, and contributed one Book Chapter on Tea Research for Darjeeling Tea Industry. I am also Life time member of Journal of Crop and Weed. REFERENCES [1] Anonymous 1988 Tea Encyclopaedia, Tea Research Association, Jorhat, Assam, India, Serial no. K185, 1-4. [2] Ahmad F, Hamid F. S., Sarwar S., Waheed A., Aslam S., Islam S., Hussain S., Ahmad N. and Ali I. 2014. Effect of different pruning times on the yield of tea(camelliaa sinensis L.) under the climatic condiontionsof Mansehra- Pakistan, Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 30,No.3, pp. 305-309. [3] Bore J. K., Isuta D. K., Itulya F. M., Ngétich W. K.2003. Effect of pruning time and resting period ontotal non-structural carbohydrates, regrowth andyield of tea (Camellia sinensis L.). J. Hort. Sci.Biotech. 78: 272-277. 304

Table 1. Weather observations recorded at the meteorological observatory of the Darjeeling Tea Research & Development Centre ( Lat 26 0 55 N, long 88 0 12 E, altitude 1347m) ). Months Mean Max Mean Min R. H. Sunshine Total rainfall Pan Evaporation Tem ( 0 C) Tem ( 0 C) (%) duration (hrs.) (mm) (mm) January 12.9 3.6 88.6 5.0 5.0 4.9 February 15.6 6.6 88.0 4.3 9.0 4.9 March 17.5 11.3 90.0 4.8 30 5.2 April 19.6 12.5 89.0 4.9 67 6.3 May 21.0 14.6 90.0 2.7 257 4.8 June 23.7 17.3 95.6 1.2 958 3.3 July 24.8 18.1 96.3 0.4 1240 3.3 August 23.4 18.4 95.5 1.0 985 3.0 September 22.0 17.3 93.5 1.7 532 3.3 October 21.1 15.0 90.3 2.6 105 3.7 November 18.7 12.0 88.3 4.0 0 4.1 December 15.4 9.8 89.0 4.5 0 4.5 Table 2: Effect of different pruning time on Leaf area index, Shoot population, Number of plucking round and green leaf production of Darjeeling tea (Average mean of 5 years pruning cycle). Pruning Times Leaf area index Shoots population Plucking round Green leaf yield (m -2 ) (m -2 ) (Per year) (Kg ha -1 ) September (3 rd week) 2.15 273 23 2281.8 October (3 rd week) 2.35 295 24 2473.6 November (3 rd week) 2.69 331 26 2747.5 December (3 rd week) 2.94 363 28 2980.0 January (3 rd week) 2.75 342 26 2800.0 February (3 rd week) 2.64 260 26 2544.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- CD at 5 % 0.32 36.74 NS 196.31 Yield of processed tea (Kg ha -1 ) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 y = 17.71x + 520.4 R² = 0.365 0 September October November December January February Pruning Times Fig.1. Effect of different pruning time on production of Darjeeling tea. Vertical bars indicate standard error of means. (Average mean of 5 years pruning cycle) 305

20 18 16 y = 1.12x + 9.303 R² = 0.426 Root Starch (%) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 September 3rd week of October November December 3rd week of January February Pruning Times Fig 2. Changes of root starch (%) during the pruning months (time) at the Experimental farm of DTRDC, Kurseong. Vertical bar indicate standared error of means. 306