Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Similar documents
Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR NUTRIENT SAMPLING IN STONE FRUIT TREES

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

REPORT to the California Tomato Commission Tomato Variety Trials: Postharvest Evaluations for 2006

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

UH Poamoho Experiment Station Winter 2008 trials grown Dec to March 2009

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

2003 BELL PEPPER VARIETY EVALUATION TRIALS

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Maui Vegetable Notes July 13, 1989

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Jennifer Fishburn Kelly Allsup University of Illinois Extension Horticulture Educators

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Melon v. Galia, aka Sarda

Peach and Nectarine Cork Spot: A Review of the 1998 Season

Distribution of Inorganic Constituents in Avocado Fruits

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Effects of Cane Burning on Older Raspberry Fields. Tim Miller WSU NWREC

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Effects of Seedling Age, and Different Levels of N, K and K/N on Quality and Yield of Tomato Grown in Perlite Bag Culture

Grapevine Mineral Nutrition

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Grapevine Tissue Analysis Bloomtime Petiole Sampling. Daniel Rodrigues Vina Quest LLC (805)

Tea Factory Firewood Ash as a Potential Plant Nutrient Source for Mature Tea

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Performance of New Vegetable Pepper and Tomato Cultivars Grown in Northwest Ohio 2009

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Strawberry Variety Trial

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Monitoring and Meeting Wine Grape Mineral Nutrition Needs in Santa Cruz Districts

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Studies in the Postharvest Handling of California Avocados

Linda Grimo, Grimo Nut Nursery

MICRONUTRIENT MAPPING IN IDAHO, WASHINGTON AND OREGONll

Psa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards an observation by Callum Kay, 4 April 2011

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Determining the Optimum Time to Pick Gwen

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

YIELD POTENTIAL OF NOVEL SEMI-DWARF GRAIN AMARANTHS TESTED FOR TENNESSEE GROWING CONDITIONS

Common Pepper Cultivars for Florida Production 1

Sukun, sa-ke, buen pan, masapan, kamansi, Pana, Friyapen, Seema Chakka, Banbukeyo, Uto, Yaca, Lemai, Rimas.

1

A new approach to understand and control bitter pit in apple

SOYBEAN INOCULATION TRIAL Bob Henson

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Field Evaluations of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) Resistant Varieties for Commercial Production

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

AGRICULTURAL EXPERINENT STATION Oregon State College Wm. A. Schoenfeld, Director Corvallis USE OF BORON IN CONTROLLING CANKER OF TABLE BEETS

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Materials and Methods

for canning, ranking about fourth in total tonnage, but first of all states in

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

Table 1. Cover crop treatments and seeding rate at the K-State experiment fields near Ottawa and Ashland Bottoms.

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

THE EFFECT OF GIRDLING ON FRUIT QUALITY, PHENOLOGY AND MINERAL ANALYSIS OF THE AVOCADO TREE

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

What went wrong. Pepper Sunscald. In this issue, find out what might have gone wrong with your vegetable harvest this season.

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Lettuce Cultivar Observation Trial 2013

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

1999 Annual Report. RED-SKINNED AND CHIPPING POTATO VARIETY DEVELOPMENT K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton 1

Understanding Seasonal Nutritional Requirements

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

Program Review Extension Activities October 1, 2008 September 30,

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2011 Soybean Performance Results for Full-Season & Double-Crop Conventional and LibertyLink Production Systems in Arkansas (Two-Year Averages)

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Conspiracy Garden Starts. varieties. COnSpIRACY garden

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Transcription:

2004 Romaine Trial Evaluation for Yellow Spot and other Abiotic Disorders University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County and USDA Richard Smith, Vegetable Crop and Weed Science Farm Advisor and Beiquan Mou, USDA Breeder Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder Background: Yellow spot disorder of Romaine lettuce is an erratic and occasional problem on various types of lettuce. It is most pronounced on Romaine lettuce but is also present on head lettuce varieties where it does not present difficulties due to striping of the outer leaves at harvest. It is mostly a problem for mature Romaine lettuce. The symptoms include bright yellow spots 1/8 inch in diameter that tend to occur on mid to older leaves. The cause of this malady is not clear. Examinations of nutritional and water relations with the plant have not yielded a clear connection between these two influences. There was some evidence from the 2003 growing season that the malady varied in severity from variety to variety. As a result, a trial was initiated in 2004 to examine the impact of Romaine lettuce varieties on the expression of this problem. Tip burn and leaf gluing were also evaluated in this trial as they were also present in the field. Methods: The varieties were seeded on April 16, 2004 at Growers Transplant in Salinas and were transplanted in the field on May 18 (see table 1 for list of varieties). The trial was located east of Chualar and the soil at the site was Chualar sandy loam soil. The lettuce was grown to full maturity and was rated for yellow spot on June 25 and July 1 which were one week prior to and at harvest, respectively. At harvest, samples of a recently matured, fully expanded leaves were collected from a yellow spot resistant and susceptible variety, and sent to the DANR Laboratory at UC, Davis for nutrient analysis. The trial offered an opportunity to examine other characteristics of the varieties. As a result, in addition to yellow spot evaluations the following evaluations were conducted: tip burn (obvious symptoms on the emerged leaves), leaf gluing (the cause of head deformity and whose cause is also not fully determined), as well as some horticultural characteristics. Results: There were significant differences in the amount of yellow spot among the varieties (table 2). On the first evaluation dates, there were several varieties that were essentially free of yellow spot. However, one week later at harvest no varieties were completely free of the malady; however, Caesar and King Louie were notable in having few yellow spots on the leaves at harvest. There were dramatic differences among the varieties in the level of obvious tip burn with some varieties with none and others with extensive symptoms. There were wide differences among the varieties with respect to leaf color (light green to dark green), leaf texture (flat to savoy), plant height and plant shape (table 3). The nutrient content differed significantly between Caesar which is a variety with little spotting and Heavy Heart a heavily spotted variety (table 4). Total phosphorus, sulfur, calcium, magnesium, manganese and copper levels were higher in the yellow spot affected variety. This observation confirms earlier observations that yellow spot tissue has higher levels of iron, manganese, calcium and magnesium. If yellow spot

is a concern for Romaine production, it can be managed by selection of varieties that have less of a tendency to exhibit the malady. Table 1. Romaine varieties, types and seed sources. No. Name Description Seed Source 1 Altura Green Romaine Paragon 2 Barcarole Green Romaine Seeds of Change 3 Beretta Green Romaine Shamrock 4 Braveheart Green Romaine - heart Seminis 5 Caesar Green Romaine - heart Progeny 6 Coastal Star Green Romaine Coastal Seed 7 Conquistador Green Romaine Seminis 8 Craquante D Avignon Green Romaine Seeds of Change 9 Darkland Green Romaine Central Valley Seeds 10 Fresh Heart Green Romaine - heart Orsetti 11 Gladiator Green Romaine Coastal Seeds 12 Green Forest Green Romaine CVS 13 Green Towers Green Romaine Harris Moran 14 Hearts Delight Green Romaine - heart Coastal 15 Heavy Heart Green Romaine - heart Seminis 16 Jericho Green Romaine Seeds of Change 17 King Louie Green Romaine Paragon 18 Klamath Green Romanie Seminis 19 Paramount Green Romaine Coastal Seed 20 Parris Island Green Romaine USDA 21 Rubicon Green Romaine Paragon 22 Siskiyou Green Romaine Seminis 23 SSC 1611 Green Romaine Shamrock 24 Sunbolt Green Romaine CVS 25 Triple Threat Green Romaine Seminis 26 Triton Green Romaine Harris-Moran 27 Valmaine Green Romaine TX Ag. Exp. Station

Table 2. Yellow spot, tip burn and leaf gluing evaluations. Yellow Spot 1 Tip Burn 2 Gluing 3 June 25 July 1 June 25 July 1 June 25 Altura 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 1.4 Barcarole 0.0 1.0 1.9 1.3 1.7 Beretta 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 2.3 Braveheart 0.3 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 Caesar 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.5 Coastal Star 0.3 2.3 1.2 1.3 2.0 Conquistador 0.3 2.7 0.7 1.3 3.7 Craquante D'Avignon 1.4 3.2 1.9 2.2 1.1 Darkland 0.2 1.8 0.0 0.3 2.2 Fresh Heart 0.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.0 Gladiator 0.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 Green Forest 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.7 1.7 Green Towers 0.3 2.3 1.3 1.1 1.7 Heart's Delight 0.0 1.7 1.0 0.8 3.1 Heavy Heart 1.3 3.1 1.0 1.3 1.1 Jericho 0.7 1.7 2.2 2.3 1.0 King Louie 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 Klamath 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.7 1.4 Paramount 0.3 2.3 1.7 0.7 2.5 Parris Island 0.7 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.1 Rubicon 0.0 1.7 1.3 0.3 1.4 Siskiyou 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.0 1.4 SSC 1611 0.5 3.0 1.3 1.0 1.4 Sunbolt 0.0 1.0 1.0. 0.3 1.2 Triple Threat 1.3 2.8 0.7 0.7 1.4 Triton 0.3 2.0 0.3 0.3 2.3 Valmaine 0.3 2.3 1.2 0.7 1.9 Grower's 1.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 LSD (0.05) ns 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.4 1. Yellow spot rating: 0 = none, 1 = few, 2 = many 2. Tipburn rating: 0 = none, 1 = some, 2 = extensive 3. Glued leaf symptoms: Number of plants/plot (square-root transformed)

Table 3. Horticultural characteristics of Romaine varieties on June 25 Color 1 Leaf Texture 2 Height 3 Shape 4 Altura 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 Barcarole 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 Beretta 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.5 Braveheart 1.8 1.2 1.7 2.0 Caesar 1.8 2.3 2.0 2.0 Coastal Star 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 Conquistador 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 Craquante D'Avignon 2.2 2.5 2.0 2.5 Darkland 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 Fresh Heart 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.7 Gladiator 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Forest 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 Green Towers 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 Heart's Delight 2.3 1.7 2.2 2.2 Heavy Heart 1.8 1.2 1.8 1.7 Jericho 1.7 3.1 2.2 2.0 King Louie 2.0 2.8 2.3 2.3 Klamath 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.5 Paramount 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 Parris Island 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.7 Rubicon 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.5 Siskiyou 1.8 2.5 2.0 2.0 SSC 1611 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 Sunbolt 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.5 Triple Threat 2.0 1.8 2.0 1.7 Triton 1.8 1.5 1.7 1.7 Valmaine 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.0 Grower's 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.0 LSD (0.0.0.05) n.s. 0.6 n.s. n.s. 1. color: 1 = light, 2 = medium, 3 = dark green 2. Leaf texture: 1 = smooth, 2 = intermediate, 3 = savoy 3. height: 1 = short, 2 = intermediate, 3 = tall 4. Head shape: 1 = flat, 2 = intermediate, 3 = upright

Table 4. Total nutrient content of Caesar (little yellow spot variety) and Heavy Heart (yellow spot susceptible) Percent ppm Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium Calcium Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Iron Copper Caesar 1 4.01 0.54 7.09 0.70 0.29 2450 35.5 44.8 47.5 77.8 5.9 Heavy Heart 2 4.41 0.71 7.09 1.05 0.38 3157 34.3 105.0 74.3 113.2 7.9 LSD (0.05) n.s. 0.07 n.s. 0.14 0.04 546 n.s. n.s. 12.6 10.8 1.3 1 Yellow spot tolerant variety; 2 Yellow spot susceptible variety