Agricultural scenario JRODOS calculations

Similar documents
Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

2012 Estimated Acres Producers Estimated Production Units Estimated Farm Value Farm Crawfish 182,167 1,251 90,973,725 Lbs.

openlca case study: Conventional vs Organic Viticulture

The Environment on a Platter

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDISATION OF FORMULATED BAKED PRODUCTS USING MILLETS

European Union comments for the. CODEX COMMITTEE ON CONTAMINANTS IN FOOD (CCCF) 4th Session. Izmir, Turkey, April 2010.

SLO Presentation. Cerritos College. CA Date: 09/13/2018

Towards EU MRLs for biocides current status. Karin Mahieu

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Field water balance of final landfill covers: The USEPA s Alternative Cover Assessment Program (ACAP)

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

Climate change and its mitigation in sustainable coffee production JOSEPH K KIMEMIA COFFEE RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Coffee weather report November 10, 2017.

Resistant Varieties: New Perspectives for a More Sustainable Viticulture

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2014

Cyprodinil CYPRODINIL (207)

How to get and preserve good quality in apples a short survey

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

September 21 th, 2018

RESIDUE AND ANALYTICAL ASPECTS

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

Experience with Biocidal Product Family as competent authority

Poncho Plus CONTENTS

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

The Challenge of Using Regionalized LCA at Nestlé

Lesson 23: Newton s Law of Cooling

Universally. delicious. from the heart of Europe

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2013

Modelling the shelf life of fruit depending on pre-harvest and post-harvest conditions

2018/19 expected to be the second year of surplus

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

SPRING GRADE. Edible SCHOOL GARDEN. Program WORKBOOK ANSWER KEY VERSION: AUGUST 2016 JHU CAIH

SMALLHOLDER TEA FARMING AND VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA

NomaSense PolyScan. Analysisof oxidizable compounds in grapes and wines

Effect of Phosphorus and Plant Density on Floral Yield and Corm Production of Crocus sativus

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Official Journal of the European Union

SANCO/1069/2008 Rev. 1 (POOL/E4/2008/1069/1069R1-EN.doc)

Unit Test: Nature of Science

Decision making with incomplete information Some new developments. Rudolf Vetschera University of Vienna. Tamkang University May 15, 2017

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

What Went Wrong with Export Avocado Physiology during the 1996 Season?

Isis. DOK Malta Denominazzjoni ta Origini Kontrollata YEAR 2012

Successful Storage of By-Products

Predicting Susceptibility of Gala Apples To Lenticel Breakdown Disorder: Guidelines for Using the Dye Uptake Test

VitaClay Broth Cooking Chart for VM7800-5

Malting barley prices Basis FOB Swedish /Danish Port Basis Oct 14/15/16/17/18/19 EUR/mt 230

GLOSSARY Last Updated: 10/17/ KL. Terms and Definitions

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LEGALIZING RETAIL ALCOHOL SALES IN BENTON COUNTY. Produced for: Keep Dollars in Benton County

Healthy Soils for a Sustainable Viticulture John Reganold

5.24 ISOPYRAZAM (249)

Official Journal of the European Union L 243/41 DIRECTIVES

Taste Sensing System and Coffee Application

Name of trading venue: ICE FUTURES EUROPE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS DIVISION

K. C. KANODIA AND P. RAI Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi ABSTRACT

Biocidal Product Families instead of Frame Formulations The right step forward? Sara Kirkham

Beth Strong, RN, FNP-C The Jaffe Food Allergy Institute Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York 2/23/13

Official Journal of the European Union

October November December 2015

DIRECTIVES COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2007/8/EC. of 20 February 2007

Break down K cups. Faculty collection

The aim of the thesis is to determine the economic efficiency of production factors utilization in S.C. AGROINDUSTRIALA BUCIUM S.A.

Finnish feed evaluation system and Feed Tables

BETTER FAMILY LIVING FOR NATIONAL VICTORY YOUR FAMILY'S FOOD SUPPLY. Prepared by MABEL C. MACK. Extension Nutritionist

Laboratory Performance Assessment. Report. Analysis of Pesticides and Anthraquinone. in Black Tea

Paper Reference IT Principal Learning Information Technology. Level 3 Unit 2: Understanding Organisations

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Cows feeding and milk and dairy product sensory properties: a review

AMENDMENT APPLICATION

ROUSSEAU OCHRATOXIN A IN WINES: CURRENT KNOWLEDGE MYCOTOXINS AND WINE PAGE 1

Market, Regulatory & Policy Update for Plant-based Ingredients

Computerized Models for Shelf Life Prediction of Post-Harvest Coffee Sterilized Milk Drink

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Prices for all coffee groups increased in May

Working With Your Environment. Phenotype = Genotype x Environment

Bag-In-Box Package Testing for Beverage Compatibility

Effect of SPT Hammer Energy Efficiency in the Bearing Capacity Evaluation in Sands

Identifying & Managing Allergen Risks in the Foodservice Sector

Dietary intake of caffeine. EFSA STAKEHOLDERS MEETING ON THE SAFETY OF CAFFEINE Brussels, 5 March 2015

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Overview of Inputs Required for Apple Juice Production in Montezuma County

The Analysis of Food Samples for the Presence of Genetically Modified Organisms

GI Protection in Europe

The Elasticity of Substitution between Land and Capital: Evidence from Chicago, Berlin, and Pittsburgh

Biocides IT training Vienna - 4 December 2017 IUCLID 6

World Cocoa Conference Nov 2012

Selection bias in innovation studies: A simple test

Abstract for Sugar Production. Ensymm abstract for Sugar Production

Grape Growers of Ontario Developing key measures to critically look at the grape and wine industry

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Proposed Excess Loss (Pure Premium) Factors

Airborne Remote Sensing for Precision Viticulture in Niagara. Ralph Brown School of Engineering University of Guelph

2. The proposal has been sent to the Virtual Screening Committee (VSC) for evaluation and will be examined by the Executive Board in September 2008.

L 22/24 Official Journal of the European Union

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Transcription:

Agricultural scenario JRODOS calculations C. Turcanu G. Olyslaegers Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK CEN Institute for Environment, Health and Safety catrinel.turcanu@sckcen.be 1 EMRAS II WG8 Meeting SCK CEN, Brussels, 27-28/09/2011

FDMT = Terrestrial food chain and dose in (J)RODOS Model description: [Müller et al, 2006] Based on ECOSYS ([Müller and Pröhl, 1993]) Radioecological regions Main input Time-integrated activity concentration in air (near ground) Activity deposited by precipitation per unit ground area Amount of precipitation Date of deposition Transfer to feedstuff and foodstuff Deposition to plant leaves and soil Translocation, root uptake Transfer to animal products (through feedstuff + inhalation) Food processing (incl. storage) The model 2

Parameters used for the exercises Most model parameters: FDMT database Default parameters for Central Europe Soil to plant transfer factors IAEA TECDOC 1616 Leaching C.F. Base & R.D. Sharp, A proposal for estimation of soil leaching and leaching constants for use in assessments models, Journal of Environmental Quality 12, pp. 17-28, 1983. Assumed infiltration rate: 100 mm/year 3

Other radioecological parameters Harvest time Grass: 1.5-31.10 Winter wheat: 5.8 Potatoes: 15.8-24.9 Leafy vegetables: all year round (no growth during winter time) Fruit vegetables: 1.8-15.10 Root vegetables: 1.8-31.10 4

5 Processes considered Plant type External contamination Contamination of stored products Grass Weathering No storage; available all year Growth dilution explicitly round Translocation into/from root zone Hay Weathering Average of harvest period. 2 Growth dilution explicitly harvest periods, with weights 0.7 and 0.3, respectively. Translocation into/from root zone Maize, beet leaves Weathering, growth dilution Stored products have the activity implicitely (through the yield at of the last day of the harvest harvest) period. Leafy vegetables Weathering, growth dilution implicitely (through the yield at harvest) Cereals, potatoes, beet, fruit, berries Root vegetables, fruit vegetables Translocation No storage; available all year round. Growth is not considered during winter time. Stored products have the activity of the last day of the harvest period. Stored products have the average contamination over the whole harvest period.

Exercises Two types of soil: clay and sandy Two release times: May 1 st and November 20 th Three radionuclides: Sr-90, Cs-137, I-131 Dry and wet deposition Output Activity concentration [Bq/kg] in several plant and animal products in the first 2 years Maximal and average daily activity concentrations Ingestion doses for the first and second year for adults and 1 year old child (European diet- default RODOS diet) + Ingestion dose from various food products for adult and 1 year old child (Belgian diet) 6

Maximal activity concentrations Cow's milk Beef Pork Chicken Lamb Winter FruitVegsLeafyVegs RootVegs Wheat Potatoes GrassInt Clay May Sr 8.47E+01 3.26E+00 1.09E-02 8.78E-02 3.69E+00 1.11E+00 1.46E+03 3.64E-01 4.63E-01 2.28E-01 1.33E+03 Cs 1.36E+02 1.79E+02 4.32E+01 3.25E+00 1.27E+03 4.24E+01 1.46E+03 3.18E+01 9.84E+00 5.86E-02 1.33E+03 I 1.61E+02 2.16E+00 7.05E-04 1.68E-03 2.36E+00 3.14E-02 1.64E+03 2.16E-02 4.21E-03 1.96E-07 2.00E+03 ClayNov Sr 9.85E-01 8.37E-02 1.40E-02 1.13E-01 5.88E-02 3.88E-02 1.87E+03 1.68E-01 2.08E-01 1.03E-01 2.94E+03 Cs 3.67E+00 8.31E+00 2.90E+00 4.05E+00 3.20E+01 1.05E-02 1.87E+03 1.72E-02 3.57E-02 2.60E-02 2.94E+03 I 6.87E-01 2.52E-03 1.06E-03 2.52E-03 2.01E-03 1.47E-12 2.45E+03 2.59E-13 9.82E-13 1.64E-13 8.08E+03 Sandy May Sr 8.56E+01 3.30E+00 1.10E-02 8.87E-02 3.73E+00 1.51E+00 1.47E+03 9.52E-01 8.21E-01 3.76E-01 1.35E+03 Cs 1.37E+02 1.80E+02 4.38E+01 3.33E+00 1.29E+03 4.28E+01 1.47E+03 3.22E+01 1.01E+01 1.68E-01 1.35E+03 I 1.70E+02 2.27E+00 7.42E-04 1.77E-03 2.48E+00 3.03E-02 1.72E+03 2.27E-02 4.44E-03 5.32E-06 2.10E+03 SandyNov Sr 1.82E+00 2.27E-01 1.41E-02 1.14E-01 1.57E-01 2.11E-01 1.89E+03 4.24E-01 3.67E-01 1.69E-01 2.97E+03 Cs 3.74E+00 9.04E+00 2.93E+00 4.08E+00 3.31E+01 1.64E-02 1.89E+03 3.13E-02 1.06E-01 7.44E-02 2.97E+03 I 7.25E-01 2.66E-03 1.12E-03 2.66E-03 2.13E-03 1.53E-12 2.59E+03 6.77E-13 4.14E-12 4.41E-12 8.53E+03 7

Seasonal variations (some examples) 8

Seasonal variations (some examples) Ingestion of contaminated hay 9

Seasonal variations (some examples) Activity intake by inhalation Cows go out on the pasture 10

Average concentrations in food products in first and second year AVERAGE Year 1 Cow's milk Beef Pork Chicken Lamb Fruit Vegs Winter LeafyVegs RootVegs Wheat Potatoes Clay May Sr 1.42E+01 1.60E+00 5.39E-03 2.05E-03 2.08E+00 3.91E-01 6.51E+01 2.85E-01 3.44E-01 1.70E-01 Cs 2.60E+01 7.65E+01 2.54E+01 1.92E+00 5.46E+02 1.99E+01 6.50E+01 1.93E+01 7.31E+00 4.36E-02 I 5.62E+00 1.51E-01 2.19E-05 5.18E-05 1.74E-01 1.53E-03 3.06E+01 1.08E-03 3.53E-04 1.87E-08 Clay November Sr 1.14E-01 1.14E-02 1.55E-03 1.96E-03 8.82E-03 1.29E-02 1.74E+02 5.56E-02 6.91E-02 3.41E-02 Cs 9.74E-01 2.98E+00 3.75E-01 2.73E-01 1.14E+01 3.46E-03 1.74E+02 5.67E-03 1.19E-02 8.60E-03 I 2.89E-03 7.82E-05 3.28E-05 7.76E-05 6.25E-05 1.32E-13 5.62E+01 2.32E-14 8.34E-14 1.53E-14 AVERAGE Year 2 Cow's milk Beef Pork Chicken Lamb Winter FruitVegsLeafyVegs RootVegs Wheat Potatoes Clay May Sr 1.78E+00 6.41E-01 4.79E-03 1.02E-03 4.92E-01 1.48E-01 8.97E-02 3.41E-01 4.36E-01 2.15E-01 Cs 1.40E+00 1.13E+01 1.96E+01 1.53E+00 5.62E+01 4.17E+00 2.49E-02 4.00E+00 2.46E+00 5.35E-02 Clay November Sr 4.31E-01 5.93E-02 9.14E-04 4.72E-04 3.74E-02 3.76E-02 4.15E-02 1.62E-01 2.01E-01 9.95E-02 Cs 1.32E+00 4.60E+00 4.01E-02 1.16E-02 1.62E+01 9.95E-03 1.15E-02 1.63E-02 3.41E-02 2.47E-02 11

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy 12

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy Average concentrations over the harvest period TF to fruit vegetables: 1.04E-2 for clay soil and 6.92E-02 for sandy 13

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy 14

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy 15

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy TF to leafy vegetables: 3.68E-4 for clay, 3.20E-3 for sandy 16

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy 17

Ratio of activity concentrations clay vs. sandy 18

19 RODOS (Central European) diet

20 RODOS (Central European) diet

Rain vs. no rain For the same ground deposition all values smaller with rain (20 mm/h): from 2 (potatoes) to 30 times (grass) lower 21