Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Similar documents
Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

2016 Corn Silage Field Crop Trials Results

Elk Mound Seed. Company Introduction

2013 Corn Silage Harvest Report for Wisconsin Central [ WICE ] Charlie Knigge, Winnebago County, WI [ OMRO ]

Forage Systems to Increase Productivity

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Nutrient Management With Cover Crops. Darryl Warncke Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Michigan State University

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

Comparing Qualities of Grain Corn to Silage Corn

Corn Information for North Carolina Corn Growers

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Statewide Summary: Sorghum Silage Performance, Georgia, 2018 Company or Hybrid or

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Contents: Table 1: Precipitation in Chatham, Table 2: Oat Variety Trial. Table 3: Spring Wheat Variety Trial. Table 4: Barley Variety Trial

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

2010 U.P. Corn, Small Grain and Forage Performance Trials Introduction Methods Discussion

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Forage Planting Alternatives Mike Ballweg, Crops & Soils Agent, Sheboygan County

Southern Illinois Ornamental Corn Variety Trial,

2006 Crop Production Exam. Answers County Contest

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

The Texas A&M consisted. crop water. demand. Menke. Plot Size: were. hybrids were

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Double Crop System. To Maximize Annual Forage Yield & Quality. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Jade II Bean. Inspiration Bean. Wyatt Bean. Emerald Jewel Broccoli. BC-63 Cabbage 3/21/2012. Must Have Vegetables

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Corn Growth and Development

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

Table 1. Cover crop treatments and seeding rate at the K-State experiment fields near Ottawa and Ashland Bottoms.

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

PRODUCT GUIDE

Corn Silage for Dairy Cows 1

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

MSU Weed Science Research Program

2011 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

CORN SILAGE YIELD AND DIGESTIBILITY TRIAL

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Opp p o p r o tun u i n t i ie i s t o o I m I p m r p ov o e v S arch h D ig i e g stib i i b l i i l t i y y on o n D air i y F rms

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Res. P 160 (high) K 36 (low) Mg 82 (opt) Al 11 Ca 1462 Effect. CEC 8.1 Zinc 3.1 (high) Sampled prior to spreading manure 1

Some Hay Considerations

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

CORN SILAGE TESTS IN TENNESSEE 2017

Anton E. Coy, John D. Gassett, and J. LaDon Day Editors

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

2014 Organic Silage Corn Variety Trial for Coastal Humboldt County

HOW EMERGENCY FORAGE CROPS GREW IN 2003

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Expanding Bio-based Energy Crop Options for Dryland Systems Kevin Larson 1, Dennis Thompson, Deborah Harn, Timothy Macklin, and James Wittler

Department of Horticulture The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research &Development Center Wooster, OH 44691

2006 New Mexico Farmer Silage Trials

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Help in Addressing the Challenges to Entering the Vineyard and Winery Industry

Georgia 2012 Corn Performance Tests

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

DESIGNED FOR MAKING MILK. dependable yields quality fiber digestible starch

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Organic Seed Partnership

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Insect Screening Results

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Crop Load Management of Young Vines

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Bulletin No Growing Safflower in Wyoming

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

1. What is the proper seeding depth for Alfalfa? a. ½ inch b. 1 ½ inches c. 1 inch d. 2 inches

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Trial was funded by Sow True Seeds and Twin Oaks Seed Farm, with help from Organic Seed Alliance.

Cost of Establishment and Production of Cold Hardy Grapes in the Thousand Islands and Chautauqua-Lake Erie Region, 2015

2010 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

AVOCADO FARMING. Introduction

Avocado Farming. Common varieties grown in Kenya

2011 BARLEY VARIETY TRIALS MATERIALS AND METHODS

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Three different kinds of silage may be recognized according to the temperature during fermentation:

Sunflower Research Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Rosalie Madden, Amanda Gervais, and Erica Cummings UVM Extension

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

Sunflower Research Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Rosalie Madden, Amanda Gervais, and Erica Cummings UVM Extension

Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Transcription:

Silage Yield Data 40 7' 4.81" N, 76 11'27.02" W Elevation: 318 ft. Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till planted into cover crop) at 27,700 seeding population Hybrid Relative Maturity Date Silage Harvested Soils: Ha A - Hagerstown Silt Loam Fertility: Full crop of crimson clover grown as a cover crop in bloom (Sprayed with glyphosate) - Semi-Solid Manure slurry applied over top of crimson clover cover crop, then no-tilled planted Silage Harvest Population Plant height (inches) Ear height (inches) Pre-silage harvest disease ranking (1=best, 10=worst) Silage yield Tons/A (Dry Matter) % Moisture Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture) Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30 NEL Mcallb Starch % of DM 7-hr Starch (% of starch) Milk per Ton Milk per Acre Grain Harvest Population Ear Weight Fresh Weight (Tons/Acre) Yield: Bu/Acre of Shelled Corn at 15.5% Moisture MC 4050 90 9/23/14 33,000 116.3 49.7 3.0 11.13 6 31.81 37.11 7.6 54.2 0.82 45.9 75.2 3,449 38,401 29,250 9.09 250.0 3.0 MC 4210 92 9/23/14 33,750 119.6 46.9 3.5 9.86 59.0 28.17 32.87 7.8 57.3 0.76 30.8 62.7 3,031 29,887 23,250 7.73 213.3 4.0 MC 4430 94 9/24/14 27,000 117.8 4 4.0 9.44 51.6 26.97 31.46 7.4 52.6 0.76 35.8 63.7 2,730 25,766 23,250 6.89 180.5 3.0 MC 4560 95 9/24/14 33,000 119.4 44.7 2.5 9.77 63.3 27.92 32.58 7.8 53.3 0.76 33.7 71.8 3,192 31,196 24,000 7.41 197.8 3.0 MC 4880 98 9/24/14 30,750 126.3 47.4 13.11 56.9 37.46 43.70 6.9 56.2 0.78 36.1 66.5 3,011 39,477 26,250 8.81 232.2 3.4 MC 4954 99 9/26/14 27,750 133.8 52.6 1.0 13.47 64.7 38.49 44.90 7.6 57.1 0.78 34.7 76.0 3,397 45,759 27,000 11.58 258.7 2.3 MC 5090 OG 100 9/26/14 28,500 135.4 57.1 2.5 11.09 62.7 31.67 36.95 6.5 46.3 0.72 27.7 56.4 2,777 30,785 28,500 8.39 214.5 3.1 MC 5250 102 9/26/14 26,250 138.8 56.5 13.60 56.5 38.86 45.34 6.7 54.4 0.80 44.2 73.3 3,012 40,971 27,750 9.75 247.3 2.4 MC 5300 OG 103 9/29/14 27,750 135.8 56.6 2.5 10.97 66.7 31.35 36.57 6.9 49.8 0.74 34.4 70.0 3,137 34,420 27,750 10.22 248.6 2.5 MC 5370 103 9/29/14 29,250 131.4 47.3 3.0 11.82 61.9 33.78 39.41 7.0 55.3 0.79 38.7 76.7 3,308 39,109 28,500 9.52 254.6 3.4 MCT 5451 104 10/1/14 28,500 132.1 51.8 4.5 11.37 58.1 32.49 37.91 7.2 51.9 0.80 44.4 68.9 3,047 34,649 30,000 8.72 226.2 2.6 MC 5660 106 10/1/14 27,000 147.4 56.2 1.5 13.39 59.7 38.26 44.64 7.1 52.9 0.73 26.6 50.4 2,738 36,666 27,000 10.36 249.8 3.1 MC 535 107 10/1/14 29,250 136.4 53.0 18 65.3 34.52 40.28 6.5 50.2 0.74 31.3 70.9 3,081 37,226 28,500 12.23 282.7 3.3 MC 5800 OG 108 10/1/14 28,500 131.4 57.0 1.5 13.32 62.5 38.07 44.41 6.9 53.5 0.78 38.6 69.2 3,219 42,889 30,000 10.08 244.1 2.8 MC 6060 110 10/1/14 28,500 133.8 55.9 2.5 10.82 66.7 30.90 36.05 7.1 51.1 0.73 31.4 67.6 3,119 33,735 27,750 11.53 269.7 2.5 MC 6150 111 10/1/14 28,500 137.9 53.0 2.5 13.03 65.9 37.22 43.42 7.2 54.6 0.75 32.5 77.5 3,304 43,039 25,500 11.30 240.3 3.0 MCT 6273 112 10/2/14 27,500 131.3 53.0 1.5 11.11 63.2 31.74 37.03 7.0 51.7 0.77 39.1 66.3 3,201 35,563 25,500 10.22 248.8 4.0 MCT 6361 113 10/2/14 28,500 14 57.3 13.66 64.6 39.02 45.52 7.2 52.5 0.75 34.3 65.6 3,200 43,703 27,750 11.48 250.6 4.0 MC 6470 114 10/2/14 27,750 126.4 44.3 1.0 13.44 64.3 38.39 44.79 7.4 58.4 0.76 33.7 70.7 3,347 44,975 26,250 11.34 248.8 3.0 MC 6580 115 10/2/14 29,250 138.8 59.7 13.64 61.4 38.97 45.47 7.0 54.3 0.76 34.6 68.2 3,082 42,042 27,750 12.23 258.6 3.0 MC 6750 117 10/2/14 27,750 148.1 61.0 1.5 13.83 63.5 39.50 46.09 7.4 53.8 0.74 29.3 60.2 3,079 42,571 25,500 12.38 281.2 4.0 Plot Averages Silage Corn data Ear & Shelled Corn data 19 61.93 34.55 40.31 7.2 53.4 0.76 35.1 68.0 3,117 37,754 27,000 10.06 242.8 Hand Husking Rating (1 to 5) 1-easy 5-hard

Yield (Bu/Acre of shelled corn @ 15.5% Moisture) Yield (Bu/Acre of shelled corn @ 15.5% Moisture) at harvest population Planted 6-3-2014, planting rate 27,700 seeds/acre 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 Hybrid (Relative Maturity) Harvest Date

% Moisture of Shelled Corn at Harvest (avg. 6 samples) % Moisture of shelled corn at harvest Planted 6-3-2014, planting rate 27,700 seeds/acre 40 35 30 25 20 19.1 18.0 21.9 20.7 21.4 30.6 23.0 23.4 25.6 20.6 22.2 26.2 28.8 25.9 28.0 34.0 25.8 32.2 31.8 34.2 29.7 15 10 5 0 Hybrid (Relative Maturity) Harvest Date

Hand Husking Rating (1 to 5, 1=Easy, 5 =Hard) 4.5 Hand Husking Rating of Corn Planted 6-3-2014 Hand Husking Rating (1 to 5, 1=Easy, 5=Hard) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 2.3 3.1 2.4 2.5 3.4 2.6 3.1 3.3 2.8 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Hybrid (Relative Maturity) Harvest Date

Disease Visual Ranking, 1 to 10 (1 is Best,!0 is worst) General Disease Observation Ranking (Pre-silage harvest ranking) Disease Ranking Scale 1 to 10 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 General Disease Observation Ranking (Pre-silage harvest) Disease Ranking 1 to 10 (1 is Best, 10 is Worst) G. Slocum 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 4.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity)-Harvest Date

Silage Yield -Dry Matter Silage Weight (Tons/Acre) Dry Matter Silage Yields (Tons/Acre) Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population 16.00 14.00 10 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 0 0.00 11.13 9.86 9.44 9.77 13.11 13.47 13.60 13.39 13.32 13.66 13.03 13.44 13.6413.83 11.82 18 11.09 10.97 11.37 10.82 11.11 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity)-Harvest Date

Tons/Acre of 7hour digestible starch 7 hour Starch digestibility (%) x Tons of Starch (DM) Column AM x Column AN 5.00 4.50 4.41 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.15 2.36 3.15 3.55 2.64 3.51 3.48 2.68 3.56 2.30 3.28 2.88 3.07 3.20 3.22 2.44 0 1.73 1.80 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 3-EW MC 4430 4-EW MC 4560 5-EW MC 4880 6-EW MCT 4954 7-EW MC 5090 8-EW MC 5250 9-EW MC 5300 10-EW MC 5370 1-EW MCT 5451 2-EW MC 5660 3-EW MC 535 4-EW MC 5800 5-EW MC 6060 6-EW MC 6150 7-EW MCT 6273 8-EW MCT 6361 9-EW MC 6470 10EW MC 6580 11-EW MC 6750

7 hour Starch digestibility (% of starch) 90 Graph of 7 hour Starch digestibility (% of starch) Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population Hybrids listed left to right Hard to Floury kernel texture 80 70 60 60.2 76.0 71.8 66.3 70.7 75.2 62.7 63.7 66.5 56.4 76.7 70.9 69.2 77.5 65.6 68.2 73.3 70.0 68.9 67.6 50 50.4 40 30 20 Hybrids listed left to right Hard to Floury kernel texture 10 0 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity)-Kernel Texture

Ear Weight/Total Plant Weight Ratio (%) at Silage Harvest Ear Weight/Total Plant Weight Ratio (%) at field harvest moisture Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population 0.6 0.5 0.48 0.49 0.44 Both Hybrids were very dry reducing total plant moisture and weight 0.4 0.44 0.42 0.38 0.39 0.41 0.38 0.41 0.42 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.36 0.35 0.38 0.37 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity)- Harvest date

Hybrid (RM) DAP at Harvest MC 4050 (90)-112 MC 4210 (92)-112 MC 4430 (94)-113 MC 4560 (95)-113 MC 4880 (98)-113 MCT 4954 (99)-115 MC 5090 (100)-115 MC 5250 (102)-115 MC 5300 (103)-118 MC 5370 (103)-118 MCT 5451 (104)-120 MC 5660 (106)-120 MC 535 (107)-120 MC 5800 OG (108)-120 MC 6060 (110)-120 MC 6150 (111)-120 MCT 6273 (112)-121 MCT 6361 (113)-121 MC 6470 (114)-121 MC 6580 (115)-121 MC 6750 (117)-121 Hybrid, (Relative Maturity) and DAP (Days After Planting on the Harvest Date) & Milk Line at Harvest Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population 42.50 37.50 50.00 75.00 73.75 Some Early Black Layer 67.50 Some Early Black Layer 86.25 Some Black Layer 51.25 56.25 78.75 Some Early Black Layer 83.75 Early Black Layer to Black Layer 82.50 Some Early Black Layer 55.00 68.75 71.25 55.00 81.25 Early Black Layer 62.50 Early Black Layer 50.00 Early Black Layer 50.00 Early Black Layer 57.50 Early Black Layer to Black Layer 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00 % Milk Line at Harvest

Plant Height & Ear Height (Inches) Measured Plant Height & Ear Height in INCHES (3 measurements per Rep x 4 reps) Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population 160.0 140.0 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 Plant Height (inches) Ear Height (inches) 20.0 0.0 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity) Harvest date

Plant Population /Acre 40,000 Plant population of Silage Harvested plots Planted: 6/3/14 - (No-till) at 27,700 seeding population 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Hybrid Variety (Relative Maturity) Harvest date