Reducing Transportation Damage. To Grapes and Strawberries

Similar documents
Vibration Damage to Kiwifruits during Road Transportation

Unit F: Harvesting Fruits and Nuts. Lesson 2: Grade, Pack, Store and Transport Fruits and Nuts

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center 1693 S 2700 W Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Studies in the Postharvest Handling of California Avocados

CCSB Contact: Allison L. Austin Telephone (703) Item Description Class

The important points to note are: Firmometer value. Days after treatment

THE EFFECT OF ETHYLENE UPON RIPENING AND RESPIRATORY RATE OF AVOCADO FRUIT

Lecture 4. Factors affecting ripening can be physiological, physical, or biotic. Fruit maturity. Temperature.

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

What Went Wrong with Export Avocado Physiology during the 1996 Season?

Using Natural Lipids to Accelerate Ripening and Uniform Color Development and Promote Shelf Life of Cranberries

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Ozone experimentation one the shelf life of various fruits

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Commercial Egg Production and Processing

D Lemmer and FJ Kruger

UPPER MIDWEST MARKETING AREA THE BUTTER MARKET AND BEYOND

Decolorisation of Cashew Leaves Extract by Activated Carbon in Tea Bag System for Using in Cosmetics

Factors to consider when ripening avocado

United States Standards for Grades of Walnuts (Juglans regia) in the Shell

Staff Contact: Allison L. Austin Telephone (703) Item Description Class

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Comparison of Two Commercial Modified Atmosphere Box-liners for Sweet Cherries.

FOR GRADING FLORIDA SWEET CORN

For your review, this is the first five pages of Chapter 7 of The Original Encyclopizza.

Postharvest Sample Questions

Field water balance of final landfill covers: The USEPA s Alternative Cover Assessment Program (ACAP)

LEKARGA Keepfresh sheets

SUSPENDED TRAY PACKAGE FOR PROTECTING SOFT FRUIT FROM MECHANICAL DAMAGE

Hass Seasonality. Avocado Postharvest Handling. Avocado Postharvest Handling. Mary Lu Arpaia University of California, Riverside

STUDENT NAME DATE. Science Grade 3. Read each question and choose the best answer. Be sure to mark all of your answers.

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

Steve Sargent Extension postharvest horticulturist Horticultural Sciences Department University of Florida-IFAS.

Percent of the combined rankings of the reasons why consumers purchase peaches. 35.0

Postharvest Handling Banana & Pineapple

Postharvest Handling Banana & Pineapple

United States Standards for Grades of Italian Sprouting Broccoli

Ripening Temperature Management. Why Ripen? Why Temperature Management is Important for Fruits

The California Avocado. Copyright California Avocado Commission All rights reserved

PROCEDURE million pounds of pecans annually with an average

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Green Onions SEASONAL AVAILABILITY

POTATOES USA / SNAC-INTERNATIONAL OUT-OF-STORAGE CHIP QUALITY MICHIGAN REGIONAL REPORT

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

VAPOR-HEAT TREATMENT FOR FRUITS AND VEGETABLES GROWN IN HAWAII

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Temperature Regimes for Avocados Grown In Kwazulu-Natal

Harvesting Stonefruit

Harvesting and Postharvest Harvesting and Postharvest Handling of Dates Handling of Dates

Determination of Load Bearing Capacity of Two Nigerian Fresh Tomato Varieties

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

Mischa Bassett F&N 453. Individual Project. Effect of Various Butters on the Physical Properties of Biscuits. November 20, 2006

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

THE EFFECT OF GIRDLING ON FRUIT QUALITY, PHENOLOGY AND MINERAL ANALYSIS OF THE AVOCADO TREE

NEW ZEALAND AVOCADO FRUIT QUALITY: THE IMPACT OF STORAGE TEMPERATURE AND MATURITY

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CUTICLE WAX AND OIL IN AVOCADOS

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

Each carton contained the following marks and numbers: IQF Raspberry Pieces Net wt. 20lbs (9.072 Kg) Product of Chile

SYMPTOMS OF CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE DAMAGE IN AVOCADOS

1-Methyl cyclopropene (1-MCP): An alternative for controlled atmosphere storage of South African export avocados

Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry in and for Reduced Production

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

EQUIPMENT FOR MAKING BABCOCK TEST FOR FAT IN MILK

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

A New Approach for Smoothing Soil Grain Size Curve Determined by Hydrometer

Causes and Prevention of Thompson Seedless Berry Collapse

Post-Harvest-Multiple Choice Questions

Labor Requirements and Costs for Harvesting Tomatoes. Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu, and Steven Sargent University of Florida

3. Aspirin Analysis. Prelaboratory Assignment. 3.1 Introduction

STUDY AND IMPROVEMENT FOR SLICE SMOOTHNESS IN SLICING MACHINE OF LOTUS ROOT

Peaches & Nectarines and Cherry Annual Reports

Tomato Quality Attributes

Melon Quality & Ripening

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

ConAgra Foods, Inc. ATMOsphere America End Users Panel

Elderberry Ripeness and Determination of When to Harvest. Patrick Byers, Regional Horticulture Specialist,

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT - Wine evaporation from barrels By Richard M. Blazer, Enologist Sterling Vineyards Calistoga, CA

Processing Conditions on Performance of Manually Operated Tomato Slicer

Use of SO 2 to Control Decay. Problems. Table Grape Postharvest Handling. Decay. Bleaching. Total Consumption 700 1,250 ppm Forced air cooling.

FACTORS AFFECTING BUTTERFAT PRICES IN KANSAS

Break down K cups. Faculty collection

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE-RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL WALNUT VARIETIES IN THE CENTRAL COAST

CODEX STANDARD FOR RAISINS CODEX STAN

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

POSTHARVEST SPECIALISTS postharvest.ucdavis.edu

Further investigations into the rind lesion problems experienced with the Pinkerton cultivar

Predicting Susceptibility of Gala Apples To Lenticel Breakdown Disorder: Guidelines for Using the Dye Uptake Test

Peanut Meal as a Protein. Fattening Hogs in the Dry Lot. Supplement to Corn for AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

Cherry Brining Costs as Affected by Container Types

Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition

IMPACT OF RAINFALL PRIOR TO HARVEST ON RIPE FRUIT QUALITY OF HASS AVOCADOS IN NEW ZEALAND

United States Standards for Grades of Canned Fruit Cocktail

Transcription:

Reducing Transportation Damage To Grapes and Strawberries by Dieter Fischer USDA Office of Transportation William Craig USDA Office of Transportation B. Hunt Ashby USDA Office of Transportation Abstract In-transit vibration damage to grapes and strawberries results in reduced quality for the consumer and reduced profits for the produce industry. To solve this problem, the first step is to determine which vibrational frequencies are causing the damage. In various tests, grapes and strawberries were subjected to different frequencies at constant force levels. The effects of the vibration treatments were evaluated on the basis of grading, color analysis, firmness, respiration rate and ethylene production rate. The critical frequency was found to lie between 7,5 and 1 Hertz for both commodities. Color change and respiration rate were shown to be good indicators of damage in grapes. Strawberries did not show a significant effect due to color. Firmness was not affected by vibration in either commodity. Introduction The goal of this study is to reduce damage occurring during the truck shipment of grapes and strawberries. Both commodities are produced in large quantities on the West Coast and shipped to the East Coast. Frequently during transcontinental shipment a significant portion of the load is damaged by highway-induced vibration. During shipment grape berries may be shattered from the clusters. (Although all varieties of grapes are susceptible to shattering, Thompson seedless are especially fragile.) The shattered grape berries are less salable than the full ciusters and are often discarded. Shattering is one of the inspection criteria the USDA uses to determine whether table grapes meet grade requirements. More than 12 percent shattering in a box is grounds for reduction in grade (USDA, 1971). Shattering is also the most common defect found in grapes arriving in New York, occurring in nearly half of the shipments (Cappellini, 1986). Berries which are not shattered during transportation may be bruised, and this bruising results in discoloration and reduced shelf life. With strawberries, in-transit vibration may cause skin abrasion and bruising. Under certain transport conditions, when the force of the vibrations approaches the force of gravity, the strawberries become virtually weightless in their containers. In this state, they bump together and rub against each other as they rotate. This contact results in a type of damage called roller bruising. These abrasions and bruises provide a point of entry for micro-organisms, which reduces the berry s already short shelf life. One type of defect mentioned by the USDA inspection criteria for strawberries is translucent, dull or watery appearance (USDA, 1975). This defect is caused by juice oozing from abraded or bruised skin and can result in a reduction in grade. According to a nationwide study conducted by the University of Michigan, transportation February 9/page 193

losses for these two commodities topped $18 million a year in the early 198s (Pierson, 1982). Today, the figure is surely higher. According to shippers in the produce industry, the problem is so severe that some carriers are refusing to carry these commodities. Highway-induced vibration damage is attributed to a combination of factors, including the roadbed, the suspension and the packaging. This problem may have been exacerbated in recent years by regulations allowing the use of longer trailers. Longer trailers have a greater proportion of their length behind the rear wheels. The increased distance acts as a cantilever, causing vibrations to be magnified at the rear of the trailer. Research has shown that this problem could be greatly reduced or even eliminated if trailers used air suspension (O Brien, 1969). Unfortunately, air suspension is expensive to purchase and maintain; consequently, most trucks are equipped only with leaf springs. There are several approaches which could reduce in-transit vibration damage occurring to strawberries and grapes and other commodities. These include altering the suspension of the truck, changing the pallet design, or packaging the fruit differently. The first step toward implementing any of these solutions is to determine which vibration frequencies are causing the damage. Research on other types of fruit has found that the mqjority of damage occurs in a very narrow range around the critical or resonant frequency (Chesson, 1971; Kawano, 1984). Resonance occurs when the vibrations from the roadbed are at the same frequency as the natural frequency of the load. At the resonant frequency, the force of the vibrations is magnified and the vertical movement of the load also increases. The vertical motion is most severe at the top of the load. If the packaging or the suspension can be altered so that the force of vibrations going into the load at the resonant frequency is reduced or damped out the produce will suffer less damage. Objectives The research presented here was the first phase of a larger project designed to reduce intransit vibration damage to fresh produce. The objective of this phase was to determine the critical frequencies for grapes and strawberries. Another related objective of the research was to develop practical and effective methods for evaluating quality loss during the transportation phase of distribution. Methodology Three lots each of Thompson seedless grapes and Selva strawberries were obtained from a major shipper in California. The produce was transported to the USDA Transportation Research Facility in Beltsville, Maryland. To reduce the effect of this shipment on the resuka, the strawberries were graded for quality, and all shattered grapes were removed before the experiment began. The grapes were packed in 25- pound wooden and fiberboard lugs. The strawberries were packed in plastic pint baskets, with 12 pints to a flat. The produce was vibrated at the frequencies and conditions shown in Table 1. Grapes Frequency Force level Time period Strawberries Frequency Force level Time period Experimental (Hz) (Hz) Table 1 Parameters 2-5, 5-1, 1-15, 15-2, 2-25 and 25-3.75 g for all frequency levels 6 minutes for each frequency level 2-5, 5-1, 1-15, 15-2, 2-25 and 25-3.6 g for all frequency levels 3 minutes for each frequency level Vibrational frequencies were chosen to fall within the range measured in trailers during over-theroad travel (Peleg, 1986). The force levels were increased over average values to allow a reduced vibration time (Kawano, 1984; Peleg, 1986). The commodities were placed on the vibration table as they would normally be loaded onto a truck, except that only one stack was used for each treatment level. Figure 1 shows the vibration table and the wooden bracing used to hold the stacks upright. The experiment was conducted three times with each commodiq to average out any effects due to maturity of the fruit or previous handmtg mnditione. February 9/page 194 Journal of Food Distribution Rcsmrch

z w 1- (/) > V) -1 Ef- u w 1- W z c1 u l I 1 z CY m H > Z n z< r n w -1m a 1- Z L <!- d- C=l u /I > Om Om Om OEI Oml Olm O(3ZI Orm Om /m1 El =1 [ I Journal of Food Distribution I&march Februay W/page 195

Preliminary results showed that the 5 to 1 Hz range caused the moat damage to both commo&ties. To pinpoint further the critical frequency, two additional treatments at 5 to 7,5 Hz and 7.5 to 1 Hz were added to the experiment. As Figure 1 shows, the sample boxes were in the top, middle and bottom positions. These positions were chosen to evaluate the effect of location in the stack on in-transit damage. After vibration, the quahty of the fruit in each frequency level and stack position was evaluated in several ways. In the case of the grapes, the shattered berries were removed and weighed. The strawberries were graded into five categories, ranging from unbruised to very severely bruised. The color and firmness of the fruit was also measured. Finally, the respiration rate and ethylene production of the fruit from each treatment level was measured using gas chromatography. Results of the Grape Trials Before treatmenh the grapes had an average of 8 percent shattered berries due to previous handling and the trip from California. Figures 2 and 3 show the percentage of the told weight in each lug that was shattered by the different frequency treatments. The 5 to 1 Hz range clparly caused the most damage, with 16 percent of the fruit shattered. At 16 percent shattered, the grapes would have been downgraded, according to USDA criteria. The effect of position is also significant (p s.5) in the 5 to 1 Hz range. The top box received twice as much damage as the middle box and four times the damage of the bottom box. Figure 3 shows the breakdown within the 5 to 1 Hz range. More damage occurred in the upper half, from 7.5 to 1 Hz, although there was 13.5 percent shattering in the lower range as well. Once again, the pattern due to position is evident. Color analysis showed that the grapes that vibrated at the 5 to 1 Hz range became significantly (p s.5) darker after treatment. After one week of storage, the fruit in the 5 to 1 and 1 to 15 Hz treatments were significantly (P s.5) darker than those in other treatments. The darkening was probably due to sub-surface bruising. Firmness of the fruit was not affected by the vibration treatments at p s.5. Figure 4 shows the rate of respiration for grapes from the various frequency treatments. The increased rate of carbon dioxide production by the grapes in the 5 to 1 Hz range is another indhmtion that this range causes the moat damage to the fruit. The vibrated grapes did not produce enough ethylene to draw any conclusions. Results of the Strawbe~ Trials Damage to the strawberries was evaluated by weighing the unsalable berries after each treatment. Berries were graded as unsalable if the skin was seriously abraded or the bruises penetrated deeply into the surface. Figure 5 shows that more than 5 percent of the strawberries in the top box in the 5 to 1 Hz range were unsalable after the vibration treatment. Furthermore, Figure 6 shows that thki damage was limited to the 7.5 to 1 Hz range. Color and firmness measurements were not affected by the vibration treatments at the 95 percent confidence level. Conclusions The majority of damage for both commodities was caused by vibrations between 7.5 and 1 Hz. The data also shows that there is some damage in the 5 to 7.5 Hz range in the grapes. This difference between the two fruits is probably due to differences elasticity and mass of the frui~ and its packaging. By damping the force of the vibrations between 7 and 1 Hz, the amount of damage could be greatly reduced. It would be interesting to test other commodities to see if they also fall in this narrow range. Color and respiration rate were shown to be good measures of quahty in grapes, since the results for these parameters mirrored the weight of shattered berries. For strawberries, none of the parameters testi was an accurate, quantitative reflection of damage. Additional work in this area is needed. The next phase of this project will involve testing new types of packaging both in the laboratmy and over-the-road to reduce damage. References Cappellini, R. A., M. J. Ceponis, and G. W. Lightner. Disorders in Table Grape Shipments to the New York MarkeC 1972-1984, The American Phytopathological Society, pp. 175-79, Nov. 1986. February 9/page 196

I Mimiil m o u-) o s-. 1H91M AH 3WlN33ii3d a3/mlvhs I& Februa~9/p~e 197

z o t- < 12f m co w 9 N co (D * N N--- F 1H!313M AEI ivln33ud (13W11VHS IL Februa~ 9/page 198 Journal of Food Distribution Resew&

x \ \ 1 1! 1 t 1 I t u o ) m h + r-l N amaotld 23 t u E 3 c1 E February9/page 199

z o u. ihfmiii 4 1 o ( i IA c1 z w u IL IA u) a u) lhtl13maei39vln kd 3113VlVSN(l o Id! 3 (!) L February 9/page 2

z o z ~ VI n. x m G x m w 6 m N fy N I o y-(n u); ELI w(!) a (n z U) to F 1 C-4 February 9/page 21

Chesson, J. H. and M. O Brien. Analysis of Mechanical Vibration Fruit During Transportation, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, pp. 222-24, 1971. Kawano, S., M. Iwamoto and A. Hayakawa. Evaluation of In-Transit Mechanical Injury of Fruits and Vegetables for Simulation of Transport Test, Report of the National Food Research Institute, no. 45, pp. 92-96, 1984. O Brien M., J. Gentry and R. Gibson. Vibrating Characteristics of Fruit as Related to In- Transit Injury, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, pp. 241-43, 1965. O Brien, M., 1%. Pearl, E. Vilas, Jr. and R. Dreisbach. The Magnitude and Effect of In-Transit Vibration Damage of Fruits and Vegetables on Processing Quality and Yield, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, pp. 452-55, 1969. Peleg, K. and S. Hinga. Transportation Environments of Fresh Produce, Journal of Environmental Sciences, pp. 19-25, May/ June, 1986. Pierson, T. R., J. Allen and E. McLaughlin, Produce Losses in the U.S. Food Distribution System, Agricultural Economics Report 422, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station journal article 1877. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Marketing Service, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Fresh Products Branch. Grapes, Market Inspection Instructions, November 1971. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Marketing Service, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Fresh Products Branch. Strawberries and (Xher Berries, Shipping Point and Market Inspection Instructions, March 1975. February 9/page 22