COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE

Similar documents
EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Effects of Ground Ear Corn vs. Ear Corn Silage on Rumen Fatty Acid Content

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

March The newborn calf 3/14/2016. Risks and Benefits of Milk vs. Milk Replacers for. Low milk prices???? Incentive to lower SCC?

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

MEASUREMENTS OF ENERGY METABOLISM IN SHEEP FED KURRAJONG (Brachychiton populneum), MULGA (Acacia aneura) AND NATIVE PASTURE (Stipa spp.).

Annual Grasses Preserved as Silage: Fermentation Characteristics, Nutritive Value, and Quality

Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology

Finnish feed evaluation system and Feed Tables

Agla Boost Pellets. Guaranteed Analysis

How Fine should Grain be Ground for Milk Cows?

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

The Sugarcane Industry and Rabbit Feed Manufacture

Some Hay Considerations

Faba bean whole crop silage for dairy cows

Sequential Separation of Lysozyme, Ovomucin, Ovotransferrin and Ovalbumin from Egg White

Adrizal*, A. Suprapto, & Mirzah. Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang Indonesia, *

Silage Forage Quality Using Inoculants and Packing. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Feeding Raw or Heat-treated Whole Soybeans to Dairy Cattle 1

FIELD PEAS IN LIVESTOCK DIETS. Karla Jenkins Cow/calf range management specialist, Panhandle Research and Extension Center

Cool-Season Annual Forages for Hay in North Dakota

Wood Sugar Molasses. for Dairy Cattle. I. R. Jones. gricu kural Experiment Station. State College Station Circular 181. regon. September 1949.

Feeding Prickly Pear Cactus (PCC) to Ruminants

SUPPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS FOR THE COW-CALF HERD

Successful Storage of By-Products

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Leendert Dekker Snyman

ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

The Potential for Teff as an Alternative Forage Crop for Irrigated Regions

200 Trop Anim Prod :3

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Objective. SROC Calf and Heifer Research Facility. Data for study

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

Audrey Page. Brooke Sacksteder. Kelsi Buckley. Title: The Effects of Black Beans as a Flour Replacer in Brownies. Abstract:

Prod t Diff erenti ti a on

CC110 Questions and Answers on Silage

Comparing Qualities of Grain Corn to Silage Corn

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Performance Broiler Chicks

Wood Molasses for Lambs and Steers

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Molasses-Based Feeds and Their Use as Supplements for Brood Cows 1

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

The European Hemp Industry: Cultivation, processing and applications for fibres, shivs, seeds and flowers

MALUNGAY: THE AMAZING TREE By: Mr. Victorio M. Amante

Recent Canola Meal Research with Broilers ( )

HARCOURT APPLE CIDER AGED VINEGAR. Made with Live Vinegar Mother EQUINE. Made from 100% Real Australian Apples Not from Concentrate

Nutritional value of seaweed for ruminants

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

TURKISH FOOD CODEX COMMUNIQUÉ ON FERMENTED MILK PRODUCTS (DRAFT/2015)

2016 Corn Silage Field Crop Trials Results

Preliminary Studies on the Preservation of Longan Fruit in Sugar Syrup

The delicate art of wine making. Alfa Laval Foodec decanter centrifuges in the wine industry

2015 Dairy Foods CDE Exam 4-H and Jr Consumer Division

1. Planting tips for wheat planted after row crop harvest 1 2. Sunflower preharvest treatments 2 3. Fertilizer management for cool-season pastures 3

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Blood Serum Biochemical Parameters Broiler Chicks at 29 and 49 days of age

STEP1 Check the ingredients used for cooking, their weight, and cooking method. Table19 Ingredient name and weight of company A s Chop Suey

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Stacey Hamilton, PhD State Dairy Specialist Scott E. Poock, DVM, DABVP Associate Extension Professor

Vegan Diets. Going Vegan to Improve Your Health. Starting Off Slow

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

The Use and Misuse of Fruit Juice in Pediatrics

Analysis of C-Organic, Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Application Areas and Without Application of Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Faba Bean. Uses of Faba Bean

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Sunflower Meal. in Beef Cattle Diets. Greg Lardy Animal Sciences Department Head

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

Price and Information List

Economic and Environmental Impacts Of Corn Silage Maturity Management

Net Energy of Sweet Corn Husk and Cob Silage Calculated from Digestibility in Cows

AT HARVEST EFFECTS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF WINTER CEREALS FOR SILAGE

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

FIT SUGGESTED SWEETENERS

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDISATION OF FORMULATED BAKED PRODUCTS USING MILLETS

Irradiation of seeds of Pineapple orange resulted in the generation of a mutant,

Pascual Corporation Business Structure

GRAIN TRADE AUSTRALIA. Section 9 MILLING BY-PRODUCTS & FIBRE STANDARDS 2014/2015 SEASON

MICRONUTRIENT MAPPING IN IDAHO, WASHINGTON AND OREGONll

'Every time I eat dairy foods I become ill, could I have a milk allergy.? '. Factors involved in the development of cow's milk allergy:

21 st Annual IAOM MEA District Conference November 22-25, 2009 Cape Town South Africa. Oats & Its Milling. Dr. Irfan Hashmi

Peanut Meal as a Protein. Fattening Hogs in the Dry Lot. Supplement to Corn for AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

The Wild Bean Population: Estimating Population Size Using the Mark and Recapture Method

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

THE POTENTIAL FOR TEFF AS AN ALTERNATIVE FORAGE CROP FOR IRRIGATED REGIONS. Jay Davisonˡ, Mike Laca², Earl Creech³ ABSTRACT

Price and Information List

Understanding Food Intolerance and Food Allergy

DEVELOPMENT OF MILK AND CEREAL BASED EXTRUDED PRODUCTS

COMPANY PROFILE OF. Tax reference number: VAT number: Landline: Chris Moller:

FERMENTATION. By Jeff Louella

In frozen form. Kg 3.3% % Others 1% 0.3% CHAPTER 17 SUGARS AND SUGAR CONFECTIONERY

Transcription:

COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE Dennis Costesso Manager of Research and Technical Services THE AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY OGDEN, UTAH presented at the TWENTY-SIXTH GENERAL MEETING AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SUGAR BEET TECHNOLOGISTS FEBRUARY 24-27, 1991 Section F 425

COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE Molasses and molasses dried beet pulp are important feed sources in todays' animal feed industry. The installation of chromatographic separators into todays sugar factories will result in the replacement of molasses with concentrated separator byproduct (CSB). Because todays' animal feeder is very cognizant of nutritional values in animal feed stuffs, The Amalgamated Sugar Company gave priority to evaluating this new sugar industry byproduct. The Amalgamated Sugar Company in conjunction with the Department of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences of Utah State University 1 began a study to provide nutritional data for the animal nutritionists and animal feeders who would ultimately become involved with using CSB. The objective of these studies were to (1) determine the comparative worth of CSB, and to (2) provide the end user with a sense of confidence in using CSB in place of molasses. The following studies, carried out by Utah State University for The Amalgamated Sugar Company, will be briefly discussed. ( 1) Determination of the total digestible nutrient (TDN) content of CSB. (2) comparison of CSB to molasses as a liquid supplement for cattle fed alfalfa-grass hay diets. ( 3) Cattle preference for beet pulp containing varied amounts of molasses or CSB. Additional studies currently being performed by Utah State include: (4) (5) comparison of CSB to molasses as a liquid supplement for cattle fed high energy grain diets, and Affects of CSB on nutrient digestibility, milk production and cattle preference 2 The Total Digestible Nutrient (TON) Content of CSB The use of chromatography results in the removal of sugar from molasses. The resultant by-product, CSB, has elevated levels of crude protein and ash and reduced levels of total digestible nutrients (TDN). 1 Randall D. Wiedmeier and Michael J. Arambel; Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 2 M. J. Arambel, c. w. Arave, R. D. Wiedmeier and B. H. Kent; Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT. 426

The TDN content of CSB was determined for Amalgamated by utah State University on actual feeding trials using a substitution method. The TDN of an alfalfa-grass hay basal diet and the TON of a test alfalfa-grass hay diet with 10% added CSB was determined using four ruminally cannulated cows in a replicated 2x2 latin square design. The difference in digestibility between the basil and test diet was used to calculate the digestibility of CSB. The TDN content of CSB determined in this manner was 59.34 percent. This is 20 percent lower than molasses with a reported TON content of 7 5 percent which is what would be expected because of the reduced sugar and elevated ash content of CSB. comoarison of CSB and Molasses as Liauid supplements For cattle Fed Alfalfa-Grass Hay Diets 3 The objective of this portion of the study was to compare the effects of molasses and CSB supplementation of forage diets on: (1) Nutrient Digestibility (2) Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics (3) Blood Electrolytes Two diets were prepared using a grass-alfalfa hay base supplemented with one of two liquid supplements, 7. 3 percent molasses or CSB. The supplements were of approximately equal refractometer dissolved solids concentration. These diets were fed to four ruminally cannulated cows in individual pens in a replicated 2x2 latin square design. Samples were collected twice daily during a five-day collection period. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance techniques. As can be seen in Table 1, the digestibility of dry matter, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber was not affected by type of liquid supplement. Crude protein digestibility was however lower with CSB, but since the crude protein content of CSB is higher then molasses (19.0% vs. 10.0%), the actual crude protein digested was similar in both diets at 6 percent. 3 "Comparison of CSB by-products to molasses as liquid supplements for cattle fed alfalfa-grass hay diets", Proceedings, Western Section, American society of Animal Science, Vol. 41, 1990, J. R. Bair, B. H. Tanner, R. D. Wiedmeier, M. J. Arambel and J. L. Walters, Utah State University, Logan, UT 427

r TABLE 1 CORparison of Forage Diets Supplemented With ~lasses or CSB on Nutrient Digestibility CSB, % Dry Matter 69.03 68.58 0.45 0.45 Crude Protei.:: 67.63 64.07 0.95 0.02 Acid Deterg~ Fiber 57.48 55.77 0.70 0.11 Neutral Dete.=-gent Fiber 65.62 64.75 0.58 0.32 Table 2 shows that no significant differences between liquid treatments were observed on ruminal ph, NH 3, volatile fatty acids, or viable bacteria concentrations. The portion of total bacteria that were cellulolytic was also unaffected. Molar proportions of individual volatile fatty acids were not affected and in the expected range. TABLE 2 comparison of Forage Diets supplemented* With Molasses or CSB on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics... : 2 ph Ammonia, mg/dl Volatile Fatty Acids (total mmol/ml) Volatile Fatty Acids (proportions, molar %) Acetate Propionate Butyrate Isobutyrate Isovalerate Valerate Protozoa, x 1000/ml Total Bacteria, 10 9 /ml Cellulolytic Bacteria, % / (:!SB 6.97 6.93 14.21 16.71 74.3 74.78 70.80 71.14 16.96 16.48 9.34 9.47 0.87 0.87 1.02 1.16 0.99 0.87 13.9 7.8 26.79 27.36 21.72 21.37 0.03 0.31 1.25 0.17 0.92 0.64 0.39 0.62 0.23 0.68 0.01 0.90 0.09 0.42 0.04 0.16 4.5 0.32 1.23 0.58 0.86 0.86 "Fed at 7.3 percent of diet since CSB has an elevated ash content compared to molasses, the effects on blood mineral balance is of practical importance. Table 3 show that supplementation with either molasses or CSB resulted in similar blood electrolyte concentrations. ------ 428

TABLE 3 comparison of Forage Diets supplemented* With Molasses or CSB on Blood Electrolyte concentrations. ITEM, mg/dl MOL css SE Calcium 11.62 12.01 0.41 Phosphorus 6.21 7.32 0.83 Potassium 5.70 6.20 0.47 Sodium 142.34 143.29 0.58 Magnesium 2.63 2. 71 0.32 Chloride 101.21 102.02 0.46 P>l" 0.53 o. 72 0.28 0.62 0.57 0.62 Fed at 7.3 percent of diet cattle Preference for Beet Pulp containing Varied Amounts of Molasses or CSB one of the most economical ways to market CSB is to dry it on pulp. Molasses dried beet pulp is considered as a highly palatable feed and is of paramount importance to both the sugar industry and the animal feed industry. Therefore extreme concern was placed on the effect replacing molasses with CSB would have on the palatability of beet pulp. A study was conducted by Utah state University for The Amalgamated Sugar Company to determine cattle preference for beet pulp containing varied amounts of molasses or CSB. Six pregnant two-year old heifers were fed a diet of alfalfa-grass hay and rolled corn designed to satisfy physical and chemical appetance factors. Once each day the heifers were offered free choice access to each of six beet pulp treatments containing, 10, 15, or 25 % molasses solids or CSB solids for 15 minutes. Treatments were administered in a 6x6 latin square experimental design. Results significant treatments. shown in difference Table 4 indicate in the intake of that the there was six beet no pulp TABLE 4..... f L Intake, lbs \ Mol. Solid~/Pulp <. \ CSB. Solids/PUlp I> 10 ls i 25........ lo k ~~ \ > 25 I>< SB 4.51 4.64 4.92 4.51 4.69 4. 72 0.15 429

r Experiences of The Amalgamated sugar Company in Marketing concentrated Separator By-Product Table 5 compares nutritional characteristics of beet molasses with that of CSB. I TABLE 5...,..... MOLASSES. csb.:... (\). (%}> Moisture (minimum) 25* 30* Ash (maximum) 9* 25* Total Sugars (minimum) 38* 15* I I Crude Protein (minimum) 10 15 * Ctypical>20X) TON (typical) 75 59.34 * Guaranteed analysis The Amalgamated Sugar Company applied the information given in Table 5 in conjunction with the local market requirements to come up with the relative worth of CSB as compared to molasses for use as a liquid supplement. The majority of the CSB produced by The Amalgamated Sugar Company, however, is dried on pulp. This is done for reasons of economics and because of the logistic problems associated with disposing of large quantities of liquid supplements to a limited local market. As was previously indicated, CSB can be added up to 25% solids on pulp without effecting palatability. In practice however, 20% is the practical limit because of pelletizing limitations. Excessive CSB can reduce the life of pellet mill main shafts and reduce pellet mill capacity. Pellets produced from high concentrations of pure CSB also tend to be harder than molasses pellets and thus less durable. These problems can be minimized to a large extent by blending CSB with discard molasses before drying on pulp. Blending of CSB with molasses before drying has the added advantage of providing nutritional consistency of pulp produced between factories. CSB may be dried on pulp at levels approaching 15 percent solids on pulp and still remain under the 8 percent maximum allowable sugar content for Japanese sales. The relationship between CSB solids on pulp and the sugar content of dried pulp taken from actual factory production runs is shown graphically in Figure 1. 430

FIGURE 1 CSB ON PlLP VEA8U8 SUGAR CONTENT 8UIUR av ac 8U8MI av POL 10.00 a.ao 7.60 6.40 ~.00. ----"L-...-...&--...L--...&..--...a...--...a...---1 0 10 30 PEACBolT CSB ON A.1.P Nitrate concern An occasional topic of concern with respect of CSB is the concentration of nitrates. Nitrates are changed into nitrites in the digestive tract of animals. When this is absorbed into the blood it changes the hemoglobin into a form that cannot transport oxygen. Animals may become asphyxiated in rare cases 4 The nitrate levels in CSB are directly related to the level of nitrates in the molasses separator feed material. Nitrate levels in molasses vary widely and depends on the beet growing area and beet agronomic practices. The analysis of various Amalgamated molasses samples over the last two years shows nitrates range from 0.24 to 0.63 percent on molasses. Essentially 100 percent of the nitrates in separator feed molasses remain with the CSB. The nitrates are concentrated in the CSB because of the separation of molasses solids to extract (the sucrose rich fraction). A rough approximation is that the concentration of nitrates in CSB will be twice the concentration of nitrates in molasses. 4 Feeds and Feeding, Frank B. Morrison, 21st Edition, Ithach, New York, The Morrison Publishing Company, 1951, p. 46. 431

r The potential lethal level of nitrates in feed rations is 0.9 percent or higher 5 Nitrate problems from CSB therefore are highly unlikely because, whether CSB is fed as a supplement or dried on pulp, it will always make up a relatively small portion of the total ration. Concern over the nitrate level in CSB is only relevant when the remaining components of the ration contain nitrate levels approaching the 0.9 percent level. Registration status CSB is currently registered as a commercial feed stuff in states which The Amalgamated Sugar Company markets CSB. CSB is currently beings considered by the Association of American Feed control Officials (AAFCO) for registration as an animal feed source. 5 Ensminger and Olentine, Feeds and Nutrition, 1st Edition, 3rd Printing, 1980, Clovis, CA, p. 183. 432