varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Report of Progress 961

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Southern Illinois Ornamental Corn Variety Trial,

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

OHIO. SfA1E SWEET CORN CULTIV AR EVALUATIONS Richard L. Hassell Horticulture & Crop Science OARDC/OSU Wooster, OH '

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2004

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2005

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Additional comments su type

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2008

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

Sweet Corn Variety Performance

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

N.Y.S Processing Sweet Corn Variety Replicated and Observation (su and supersweet Types) Trial Summary

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Irradiation of seeds of Pineapple orange resulted in the generation of a mutant,

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

COMPARISON OF SEEDING RATES AND COATING ON SEEDLING COUNT, ROOT LENGTH, ROOT WEIGHT AND SHOOT WEIGHT OF CRIMSON CLOVER

2007 ONION VARIETY TRIALS

1

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Variety Trials. Bulb onion is produced on. Yield of Yellow Onion Cultivars in Eastern Oregon and Southwestern Idaho

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Sweet Corn. Cornucopia of Leftovers Starting with Sweet Corn. What will we learn today? Commonly asked questions. we eat it as a vegetable

Evaluation of FŪSN ( ) on Umatilla Potato Production

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana 2013

Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

2014 Oilseed Meal as a Fertility Amendment in Sweet Corn

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Materials and Methods

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

osu 1986 VEGETABLE CULTIVAR EVALUATIONS * GREEN WRAP TOMATOES * FRESH MARKET STAKED TOMATOES * SUPER SWEET CORN * NORMAL SWEET CORN

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Klamath Experiment Station

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Nutrient Management With Cover Crops. Darryl Warncke Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

Organic Seed Partnership

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF SUPERSWEET AND SUGARY-ENHANCED SWEET CORN AT ONTARIO C.C. Shock, D. Burnett, C. Burnett, and J. Zalewski Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Summary Supersweet and sugary-enhanced sweet corn were grown in comparison with Golden Jubilee sweet corn. Supersweet corn varieties averaged 9.5 tons per acre while Jubilee average 11.3 tons per acre. The lower yields were thought to be caused by poor plant stands that could be traced to problems of seedling emergence. Sugary-enhanced sweet corn yields (11.7 tons/acre) were more comparable with Golden Jubilee. The sugary-enhanced varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much higher sucrose levels (7.9 %). A large number of factors are considered in selecting successful processing varieties. Materials and Methods Sweet corn varieties were planted May 6, 1986 in a Greenleaf silt loam soil on the Malheur Experiment Station. The soil received 100 pounds of phosphate in the fall and an additional 100 pounds of phosphate, 40 pounds of nitrogen, 20 pounds of sulfur, and 5 pounds of zinc per acre April 17. On June 12, the field was sidedressed with 120 pounds of nitrogen per acre in the form of ammonium nitrate. Varieties were planted in 4 row plots in 30 inch rows. Plot lengths were 25 feet. The seeding rate was 41,800 per acre while the final desired plant stand was 28,000 plants per acre. Each variety was planted in 4 row plots and replicated 4 times except in the cases of 4 supersweet varieties where two row plots and 3 replications were necessary because of a shortage of seed. Plant heights and stands were counted May 30. The stands were thinned to one plant per 6 inches on June 4, wherever stands were excessive. Observations during the growing season included bird damage, days to mid-silking and days to maturity. Each variety was harvested from the inside 15 feet and inside 2 rows of the 4 row plots. Only the primary ear of each variety was harvested. Yields in tons per acre were calculated with and without husks. Plant heights were recorded at harvest, both the height to the base of the top ear and the total height.

Ears were measured for lenth, maximum diameter, diameter at 6 inches, and the number of rows of kernels. The taper in each ear is the difference between the maxiumum ear diameter and the diameter at 6 inches. Kernel dextrose and sucrose levels were determined for most varieties. Results Data on supersweet corn performance are listed in Tables 1-3. Data from the sugary-enhanced sweet corn varieties are presented in Tables 4-6. Golden Jubilee was planted only with the sugary-enhanced lines, but it is listed in both sets of tables for purposes of comparison. The corn trials grew very well in 1986 and produced high yields (Tables 1 and 4). Sugary-enhanced varieties, Golden Jubilee, and supersweet lines averaged 11.7, 11.3 and 9.5 tons per acre respectively based on only the top ear on each stalk. Plant stands were low in the supersweet corn trial. Some of the supersweet varieties had 0.4 inches or more of taper, missing kernels, irregular rows, or curled ends of ears (Table 2). These characteristics would make these varieties less desirable for processing. Final 1986 variety evaluations will be completed when the frozen corn is removed from storage in January or February. Acknowledgements Resources supporting this research were provided by Ore-Ida Foods and the Oregon Processed Vegetable Committee.

IP TAB 1. Yield and height of supersweet corn varieti in 1986. Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon III/ Supersweet Corn Variety Ears per Yield 30 ft with husk Yield w/o husk Shudking Percentage Plant Stand establishment Height to Plant base of ear height t/ac t/ac CM an rmx-851 31 8.8 6.1 69.4 43 90 255 Sugar Crunc412 38 8.0 5.7 71.0 67 93 290 Cr sh2 84Q2' 35 7.6 5.3 69.3 56 74 240 C'N'S 690; 50 12.0 8.9 74.7 74 72 210 C'N'S 700; 46 10.3 7.2 69.7 76 72 220 C'N'S 710 41 9.9 7.2 72.9 67 70 230 C'N'S 7203 42 8.5 6.1 71.6 73 90 255 XPH 260 sh24 50 11.1 7.6 68.1 80 74 246 Sweetie' 47 10.8 7.6 70.4 78 85 270 SS(R) Brand 77005 46 10.2 6.9 67.1 80 90 255 C'N'S 710 coated' 36 9.0 6.3 69.8 57 70 220 C'N'S 720 cgated3 44 8.6 6.0 70.1 65 95 257 Sweet Belle', 41 9.5 6.6 69.3 64 87 245 SS(R) Brand 7200 39 9.5 6.9 72.9 66 70 230 SS(R) Brand 7900' 39 7.8 5.6 71.3 71 85 225 AVG. 42 9.5 6.7 70.5 68 81 243 LSD. (.05) 1.0 0.8 3.0 10 Check; Golden Jubilee 48 11.3 8.7 75.9 86 86 257 'Ferry Morse 2Sun Seeds 3Crookham 4Asgraw 5Abbot and Cobb

TABLE 2. Ear Characteristics of supersweet corn varieties in 1986. Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Supersweet Corn Variety Ear length Maximum diameter Ear Avg diameter at Taper Number 6" of rows Kernel dextrose Kernel sucrose Bird Damage in in in in FMX-851 9.1 1.9 1.7 0.2 18.1.88 9.10 2 Sugar Crumb'2 8.2 1.8 1.6 0.1 14.1a 1 Cr sh2 84Q2J 8.3 1.9 1.5 0.4 18.4.58 9.35 0 15,5b C'N'S 690' 8.4 1.9 1.6 0.3 b 7.17 25 C'N'S 7003 8.3 1.8 1.6 0.2 16.6 15 C'N'S 7103 8.8 2.0 1.8 0.2 16.3c.56 7.89 1 C'N'S 7203 7.9 1.8 1.4 0.4 19.2.58 9.03 0 XPH 2606 sh 2 24 8.8 1.7 1.5 0.2 16.8c d.71 9.49 0 Sweetie 7.6 1.9 1.5 0.5 167.77 9.75 0 SS(R) Brand 77005, C'N'S 710 coated; 8.1 8.6 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.6 0.4 0.2 19.0 16.8c.59 8.87 0 3 C'N'S 720 c9ated3 8.0 1.8 1.4 0.4 18.6 0 Sweet Belle4, 8.0 1.9 1.5 0.4 18.6c 0 SS(R) Brand 7200 8.8 2.1 1.9 0.2 16.5 d.57 7.61 0 SS(R) Brand 79005 7.9 1.8 1.3 0.4 19.1 0 AVG. 8.3 1.9 1.5 0.3 17.4.64 7.83 3 LSD. (.05) 0.3 0.1 0.16 0.08 0.6 Check; Golden Jubilee 8.3 1.90 1.60 0.3 17.0 0.90 3.07 11 Notes a. kernels large end of ears curled some missing kernels some irregular rows 1Ferry Morse 2Sun Seeds 3CroOkham 4Asgrow 5 Abbot and Cobb

TABLE 3. Maturation of supersweet corn varieties in 1986. Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Supersweet Corn Maturity index Variety Silking Harvest at Harvest days days 0-4 FMX-851 78 100 2.8 Sugar Crunch2 75 99 2.9 Cr sh2 84023 74 98 3.0 C'N'S6903 65 92 2.9 C'N'S 7003 69 93 2.7 C'N'S 7103 69 94 2.8 C'N'S 7203 76 99 2.8 XPH 260, sh24 72 97 2.8 Sweetie` 73 97 2.9 SS(R) Brand 77005 77 100 2.8 C'N'S 710 coated3 69 94 2.7 C'N'S 720 d9ated3 76 99 2.8 Sweet Belle' 75 98 2.9 SS(R) Brand 7200 70 94 2.8 SS(R) Brand 79005 74 98 2.8 AVG. 73 97 2.8 Check; Golden Jubilee 71 97 2.9 1Ftrry Mbrse 2Sun Seeds 3Crodkham 4Asgrow 5Abbot and Cobb

TABLE 4. Yield and height of sugary-enhanced sweet corn varieties in 1986. Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Sugary-enhanced Corn Variety Ears per Yield Yield 30 ft with husk w/o husk Shucking Percentage Plant Stand establishment Height to Plant base of ear height tons/ac tons/ac 4 b % CM cm Roger Brothers 47 12.6 9.0 71.3 81 84 240 83-1703 Roger Brothers 56 11.3 7.8 68.8 92 83 256 83-1815 Roger Brothers 50 12.3 8.4 68.4 95 100 284 84-2429 Musser 44 10.5 8.0 76.3 80 62 255 84-1209 Musser 45 10.7 7.7 71.8 79 80 263 83-435 Musser 54 12.3 9.2 74.4 91 68 235 82-251 A. 49 11.7 8.4 71.8 86 79 256 Check (Golden jubilee) 48 11.3 8.7 75.9 86 86 257 LSD (.05).97.86 4.2 6 - - -

TABLE 5. Ear characteristics of sugary-enchanced corn varieties in 1986. 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Malheur Experiment Station, Sugary-enhanced Corn. Variety Ear length Maximum diameter Ear diameter at Taper Avg Nuniber of rows Kernel dextrose Kernel sucrose Bird Damage in in in in Roger Brothers 8.0 2.03 1.63 0.4 16.7 na na 0 83-1703 Roger Brothers 7.5 1.78 1.33 0.5 15.5 0.46 2.82 13 83-1815 Roger Brothers 7.8 2.05 1.83 0.2 18.3 0.58 3.12 3 84-2429 Musser 9.0 1.83 1.68 0.2 16.6 0.50 3.36 11 84-1209 Musser 8.7 1.90 1.58 0.3 19.3 0.59 4.62 2 83-435 Musser 8.1 1.85 1.67 0.2 20.3 0.80 4.61 7 82-251 MG. 8.2 1.90 1.61 0.3 17.8 0.59 3.71 6 Check (Golden Jubilee) 8.3 1.90 1.61 0.3 17.0 0.90 3.07 11 LSD (.05).3.08.16 0.07.68

TABLE 6. Maturation of sugary-enhanced sweet corn varieties in 1986. Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Supersweet COrn Maturity index Variety Silking Harvest at Harvest days days 0-4 Roger Brothers 65 91 2.9 83-1703 Roger Brothers 68 92 3.2 83-1815 Roger Brothers 70 94 2.9 84-2429 Musser 70 94 2.9 84-1209 Musser 75 98 2.8 83-435 Musser 72 97 2.9 82-251 AVG. 70 94 2.9 Check (Golden Jubilee) 71 97 2.9