segregation and educational opportunity

Similar documents
An Intersectional Analysis of the Female Postsecondary Advantage: Gender, Race and College Selectivity*

Looking Long: Demographic Change, Economic Crisis, and the Prospects for Reducing Poverty. La Conyuntura vs. the Long-run

Community differences in availability of prepared, readyto-eat foods in U.S. food stores

Access to Affordable and Nutritious Food: Measuring and Understanding Food Deserts and Their Consequences

Child-Directed Marketing at Fast- Food Restaurants: Who is marketing to whom?

The age of reproduction The effect of university tuition fees on enrolment in Quebec and Ontario,

PARENTAL SCHOOL CHOICE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTH CAROLINA

Healthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST

Demographic, Seasonal, and Housing Characteristics Associated with Residential Energy Consumption in Texas, 2010

November 9, Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Monroe Community College Graduation and Transfer out Rates

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Gallaudet University - Fall Comparison to 4-year, Private not-for-profit Institutions

Characteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers

Debt and Debt Management among Older Adults

Religion, Housing Discrimination, and Residential Attainment in Philadelphia: Are Muslims Disadvantaged?

Western Washington University

2014 High School Graduates Christian Academy of Madison

West Virginia Wesleyan College

Iola Roberts Elementary School

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

*p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Community Needs Update:

George Mason University

Availability of Healthy Snacks in Stores Near Low-Income Urban, High-Income Urban, and Rural Elementary/Middle Schools

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

Measuring economic value of whale conservation

Southern New Hampshire University

Auburn University at Montgomery

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

Senior poverty in Canada, : A decomposition analysis of income and poverty rates

Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach

Grandview Elementary School

Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Attalla City. Superintendent Mr. Danny L. Golden

Opelika City. Superintendent Dr. Mark D. Neighbors

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

The Food Environment in Elementary Schools. Lindsey Turner, Ph.D.

This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain.

Get Schools Cooking Application

Volume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa

ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

Principal Mr. James K. Pharr. Superintendent Mr. Bill Moss

Principal Mr. L E. Franks. Superintendent Mrs. Kathi L. Wallace

Food Policy, Economics and Obesity Prevention

Running Head: A HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS 1

Food and Physical Activity Deserts in Cincinnati: Myths and Realties

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Transportation demand management in a deprived territory: A case study in the North of France

MOVING TO AN EIGHT PERIOD DAY AT RHS. Frank Howlett Sean Siet

2. The proposal has been sent to the Virtual Screening Committee (VSC) for evaluation and will be examined by the Executive Board in September 2008.

New Orleans One Year After Katrina: Obtaining a Representative Sample and Conducting a House-to-House Survey

Greenwood Elementary School

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

OF THE VARIOUS DECIDUOUS and

Fairtrade Buying Behaviour: We Know What They Think, But Do We Know What They Do?

What are the Driving Forces for Arts and Culture Related Activities in Japan?

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

ARE THERE SKILLS PAYOFFS IN LOW AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES?

School food environments and adolescent health

Missouri State University

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Preview. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Release #2461 Release Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

HERZLIA MIDDLE SCHOOL

Availability of Healthy Food in Corner Stores in Hartford, CT

Online Appendix. for. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure

Is Fair Trade Fair? ARKANSAS C3 TEACHERS HUB. 9-12th Grade Economics Inquiry. Supporting Questions

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Principal Ms. Frances Shipp. Superintendent Dr. Judy Stiefel

Calhoun County. Superintendent Dr. Judy Stiefel

Caffeine and Theobromine Intakes of Children: Results From CSFII , 1998

Anaphylaxis Management in the School Setting

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

The premium for organic wines

PIZZA HUT & WINGSTREET

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

Investigating China s Stalled Revolution : Husband and Wife Involvement in Housework in the PRC. Juhua Yang Susan E. Short

The multivariate piecewise linear growth model for ZHeight and zbmi can be expressed as:

Associations of Neighborhood Characteristics With the Location and Type of Food Stores

American Hispanics Access to Healthy Foods. Ben Golan

Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix

Family Background, School Choice, and Students Academic Performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka

EAT TOGETHER EAT BETTER BEAN MEASURING ACTIVITY

Does Zoning for Healthy Food Access Increase the Availability of Healthy Food Outlets? Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS

The Problem. Enhancing Community Food Safety Awareness: Street Vendors. Community Awareness: Street Vending

Suicide Mortality Risk in the United States by Sex and Age Groups

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT TITLE

Lecture 13. We continue our discussion of the economic causes of conflict, but now we work with detailed data on a single conflict.

Childhood Obesity Opportunity Spaces: Where are there opportunities to impact the local food environment? THEME 2: HEALTHY HEADSPACE

Supply & Demand for Lake County Wine Grapes. Christian Miller Lake County MOMENTUM April 13, 2015

Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition

Classification Bias in Commercial Business Lists for Retail Food Outlets in the U.S

Aging, Social Capital, and Health Care Utilization in the Province of Ontario, Canada

Alternative Measures of Homeownership Gaps Across Segregated Neighborhoods

Transcription:

segregation and educational opportunity new evidence from population data sean f. reardon stanford university october, 2017

Data (http://seda.stanford.edu) Average district-level standardized test scores (on state accountability tests) 11,280 geographic school districts (including local charter schools) and 384 metropolitan areas Grades 3-8 Math & ELA (today I m reporting average of Math and ELA) 2009-2015 (10 cohorts of students entering K in 2000 2011) By race/ethnicity and economic disadvantage Based on ~300,000,000 test scores Scores are placed on common scale across states, years, and grades Demographic data Family characteristics (of families with children in public schools) From American Community Survey (ACS)

Academic Achievement and Socioeconomic Status US School Districts, 2009-2015 Partial Associations of Achievement Gaps, Gap Changes, and Local Characteristics White-Black Gaps White-Hispanic Gaps Levels Slopes Levels Slopes Bivariate Correlations Racial Socioeconomic Disparities White-Minority Income Gap 0.415*** 0.073*** 0.413*** -0.013 White-Minority Education Gap 0.558*** 0.139*** 0.423*** 0.030 Segregation Minority-White School Poverty Difference 0.346 *** 0.133 *** 0.383 *** 0.056 ** Multivariate Regression Coefficients Racial Socioeconomic Disparities White-Minority Income Gap 0.018-0.001 0.029** -0.003 White-Minority Education Gap 0.169*** 0.004 0.175*** -0.001 Segregation Minority-White School Poverty 0.069 *** Difference 0.904*** 0.708*** 0.046 * -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 Sample Size 2476 2481 3241 3262 <----- Poor/Disadvantaged ------------------- Affluent/Advantaged -----> Note: ***p<=.001; **p<=.01; *p<=.05; models include measures of socioeconomic characteristics, racial composition, and school resources 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 Average Achievement (Grade Levels)

Academic Achievement and Socioeconomic Status, by Poverty Status 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 Non-Poor Students Poor Students -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 <----- Poor/Disadvantaged ------------------- Affluent/Advantaged -----> -4 3-5 Average Achievement (Grade Levels) US School Districts, 2009-2015

Academic Achievement and Socioeconomic Status, by Race/Ethnicity US School Districts with at least 20 students/grade of a given race/ethnicity, 2009-2015 White Students Hispanic Students Black Students -5-4 -3-2 -1 0 1 2 3 <----- Poor/Disadvantaged ---------------------------------------------------------- Affluent/Advantaged -----> Race-Specific District Socioeconomic Status 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4 Average Achievement (Grade Levels)

Does segregation matter? This is another way of asking whether neighborhoods and schools affect children s opportunities If so, how?

Housing Policy, Discrimination, Preference, Historical Legacy,

Which dimension(s) of segregation are related to achievement gaps? Residential vs School Segregation Are schools or neighborhoods the more important context? Between-School/Neighborhood vs Between-District Do processes operate at local or larger scale? Exposure vs Uneveness Does the composition of minority students contexts matter per se, or the difference in minority and white students contexts? Racial vs Socioeconomic Contexts Which is better proxy for the key processes of segregation?

Bivariate Correlations Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Various Dimensions of Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 School Segregation Residential Segregation Between-School Between-District Between-School Between-District Black Students' Exposure to: Black Neighbors/Classmates 0.386 *** 0.344 *** 0.352 *** 0.325 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.217 *** 0.155 ** 0.191 *** 0.013 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: Black Neighbors/Classmates 0.429 *** 0.340 *** 0.401 *** 0.314 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.628 *** 0.459 *** 0.461 *** 0.354 *** Note: each cell is the bivariate correlation between the pooled white-black achievement gap and a measure of segregation. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Bivariate Correlations Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Various Dimensions of Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 School Segregation Residential Segregation Between-School Between-District Between-School Between-District Black Students' Exposure to: Black Neighbors/Classmates 0.386 *** 0.344 *** 0.352 *** 0.325 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.217 *** 0.155 ** 0.191 *** 0.013 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: Black Neighbors/Classmates 0.429 *** 0.340 *** 0.401 *** 0.314 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.628 *** 0.459 *** 0.461 *** 0.354 *** Note: each cell is the bivariate correlation between the pooled white-black achievement gap and a measure of segregation. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Bivariate Correlations Between White-Hispanic Achievement Gap and Various Dimensions of Segregation, 318 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 School Segregation Residential Segregation Between-School Between-District Between-School Between-District Hispanic Students' Exposure to: Hispanic Neighbors/Classmates 0.395 *** 0.342 *** 0.318 *** 0.308 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.134 * -0.041 0.023-0.118 * Difference Between Hispanic and White Students' Exposure to: Hispanic Neighbors/Classmates 0.600 *** 0.515 *** 0.519 *** 0.532 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.678 *** 0.515 *** 0.450 *** 0.381 *** Note: each cell is the bivariate correlation between the pooled white-hispanic achievement gap and a measure of segregation. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Bivariate Correlations Between White-Hispanic Achievement Gap and Various Dimensions of Segregation, 318 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 School Segregation Residential Segregation Between-School Between-District Between-School Between-District Hispanic Students' Exposure to: Hispanic Neighbors/Classmates 0.395 *** 0.342 *** 0.318 *** 0.308 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.134 * -0.041 0.023-0.118 * Difference Between Hispanic and White Students' Exposure to: Hispanic Neighbors/Classmates 0.600 *** 0.515 *** 0.519 *** 0.532 *** Poor Neighbors/Classmates 0.678 *** 0.515 *** 0.450 *** 0.381 *** Note: each cell is the bivariate correlation between the pooled white-hispanic achievement gap and a measure of segregation. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Average Proportion of Poor Students in Black and White Students' Schools US Metropolitan Areas, 2009-12 Average Proportion of Poor Students in Hispanic and White Students' Schools US Metropolitan Areas, 2009-12 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Average Proportion of Poor Students in Black Students' Schools 0.6 0.4 0.2 Average Proportion of Poor Students in Hispanic Students' Schools 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Average Proportion of Poor Students in White Students' Schools 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Average Proportion of Poor Students in White Students' Schools 0.0

Exposure to School Poverty, by Race, 1991-2013 Averaged Across Metropolitan Areas Black Hispanic White 0% 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Percent Poor in Average Student's School

Racial Differences in Exposure to School Poverty, 1991-2013 Averaged Across Metropolitan Areas Black-White Difference Hispanic-White Difference 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 0% 2015 Year 20% 15% 10% 5% Difference in Average School Poverty Rate

Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation (Racial Difference in Exposure to School Poverty) US Metropolitan Areas, 2009-12 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 Metropolitan Area Achievement Gap -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 Difference in Exposure to School Poverty

Association Between White-Hispanic Achievement Gap and Segregation (Racial Difference in Exposure to School Poverty) US Metropolitan Areas, 2009-12 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 Metropolitan Area Achievement Gap -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 Difference in Exposure to School Poverty

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046 (0.295) District residents proportion black -0.312 (0.314) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** (0.160) District residents proportion poor 0.203 (0.562) School enrollment proportion black Neighborhood residents proportion black School enrollment proportion poor Neighborhood residents proportion poor Adjusted R-squared Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001. 0.664

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046 (0.295) District residents proportion black -0.312 (0.314) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** (0.160) District residents proportion poor 0.203 (0.562) School enrollment proportion black Neighborhood residents proportion black School enrollment proportion poor Neighborhood residents proportion poor Adjusted R-squared Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001. 0.664

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046 (0.295) District residents proportion black -0.312 (0.314) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** (0.160) District residents proportion poor 0.203 (0.562) School enrollment proportion black -0.159 (0.161) Neighborhood residents proportion black -0.025 (0.159) School enrollment proportion poor 0.793 *** (0.132) Neighborhood residents proportion poor 0.365 (0.283) Adjusted R-squared 0.664 0.678 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046-0.025 (0.295) (0.321) District residents proportion black -0.312-0.470 (0.314) (0.319) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** 0.501 * (0.160) (0.230) District residents proportion poor 0.203-0.106 (0.562) (0.580) School enrollment proportion black -0.159 0.195 (0.161) (0.224) Neighborhood residents proportion black -0.025-0.053 (0.159) (0.167) School enrollment proportion poor 0.793 *** 0.358 (0.132) (0.213) Neighborhood residents proportion poor 0.365 0.481 (0.283) (0.300) Adjusted R-squared 0.664 0.678 0.686 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046-0.025 (0.295) (0.321) District residents proportion black -0.312-0.470 (0.314) (0.319) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** 0.501 * 0.147 (0.160) (0.230) (0.148) District residents proportion poor 0.203-0.106 (0.562) (0.580) School enrollment proportion black -0.159 0.195 (0.161) (0.224) Neighborhood residents proportion black -0.025-0.053 (0.159) (0.167) School enrollment proportion poor 0.793 *** 0.358 0.638 *** (0.132) (0.213) (0.145) Neighborhood residents proportion poor 0.365 0.481 (0.283) (0.300) Adjusted R-squared 0.664 0.678 0.686 0.676 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Black Achievement Gap and Segregation, 311 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Difference Between Black and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion black -0.046-0.025 (0.295) (0.321) District residents proportion black -0.312-0.470 (0.314) (0.319) District enrollment proportion poor 0.897 *** 0.501 * 0.147 (0.160) (0.230) (0.148) District residents proportion poor 0.203-0.106 (0.562) (0.580) School enrollment proportion black -0.159 0.195 (0.161) (0.224) Neighborhood residents proportion black -0.025-0.053 (0.159) (0.167) School enrollment proportion poor 0.793 *** 0.358 0.638 *** 0.759 *** (0.132) (0.213) (0.145) (0.079) Neighborhood residents proportion poor 0.365 0.481 (0.283) (0.300) Adjusted R-squared 0.664 0.678 0.686 0.676 0.676 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Hispanic Achievement Gap and Segregation, 318 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Difference Between Hispanic and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion Hispanic -0.098-0.116 (0.236) (0.307) District residents proportion Hispanic -0.115-0.051 (0.332) (0.323) District enrollment proportion poor 0.409 * -0.190-0.185 (0.189) (0.250) (0.163) District residents proportion poor 0.553 0.591 (0.734) (0.776) School enrollment proportion Hispanic 0.245 0.370 (0.227) (0.288) Neighborhood residents proportion Hispanic -0.486-0.478 (0.284) (0.285) School enrollment proportion poor 0.590 *** 0.657 ** 0.720 *** 0.568 *** (0.151) (0.219) (0.162) (0.091) Neighborhood residents proportion poor -0.014-0.115 (0.332) (0.366) Adjusted R-squared 0.738 0.756 0.754 0.755 0.755 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

Coefficient Estimates from Multivariate Regression Models of the Association Between White-Hispanic Achievement Gap and Segregation, 318 Metropolitan Areas, 2009-2012 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Difference Between Hispanic and White Students' Exposure to: District enrollment proportion Hispanic -0.098-0.116 (0.236) (0.307) District residents proportion Hispanic -0.115-0.051 (0.332) (0.323) District enrollment proportion poor 0.409 * -0.190-0.185 (0.189) (0.250) (0.163) District residents proportion poor 0.553 0.591 (0.734) (0.776) School enrollment proportion Hispanic 0.245 0.370 (0.227) (0.288) Neighborhood residents proportion Hispanic -0.486-0.478 (0.284) (0.285) School enrollment proportion poor 0.590 *** 0.657 ** 0.720 *** 0.568 *** (0.151) (0.219) (0.162) (0.091) Neighborhood residents proportion poor -0.014-0.115 (0.332) (0.366) Adjusted R-squared 0.738 0.756 0.754 0.755 0.755 All models include controls for racial disparities in family socioeconomic status, metropolitan area racial and socioeconomic composition, metropolitan area fragmentation, and average per pupil spending. * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001.

White-Black Achievement Gap, by White-Black SES Gap All US School Districts with at least 100 Black & 100 White Students/Grade, 2009-2015 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 White-Black Difference in SES 5 4 3 2 1 0 White-Black Gap (Grade levels)

White-Black Achievement Gap, by White-Black Segregation All US School Districts with at least 100 Black & 100 White Students/Grade, 2009-2015 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 White-Black Difference in Exposure to Poverty 5 4 3 2 1 0 White-Black Gap (Grade levels)

White-Black Achievement Growth Rate Gap, by White-Black Segregation All US School Districts with at least 100 Black & 100 White Students/Grade, 2009-2015 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 White-Black Difference in Exposure to Poverty.6.4.2 0 -.2 White-Black Growth Gap (Grade levels/year)

Poor-Nonpoor Achievement Gap, by FRPL Segregation All US School Districts with at least 200 Students/Grade, 2009-2015 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Poor-Nonpoor Difference in Exposure to Poverty 4 3 2 1 0-1 Nonpoor-Poor Gap (Grade levels)

Poor-Nonpoor Achievement Growth Rate Gap, by FRPL Segregation All US School Districts with at least 200 Students/Grade, 2009-2015 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Poor-Nonpoor Difference in Exposure to Poverty.8.6.4.2 0 -.2 -.4 Nonpoor-Poor Growth Gap (Grade levels/year)

Partial Associations of Achievement Gaps, Gap Changes, and Local Characteristics White-Black Gaps White-Hispanic Gaps Levels Slopes Levels Slopes Bivariate Correlations Racial Socioeconomic Disparities White-Minority Income Gap 0.415 *** 0.073 *** 0.413 *** -0.013 White-Minority Education Gap 0.558 *** 0.139 *** 0.423 *** 0.030 Segregation Minority-White School Poverty Difference 0.346 *** 0.133 *** 0.383 *** 0.056 ** Multivariate Regression Coefficients Racial Socioeconomic Disparities White-Minority Income Gap 0.018-0.001 0.029 ** -0.003 White-Minority Education Gap 0.169 *** 0.004 0.175 *** -0.001 Segregation Minority-White School Poverty Difference 0.904 *** 0.069 *** 0.708 *** 0.046 * Sample Size 2476 2481 3241 3262 Note: ***p<=.001; **p<=.01; *p<=.05; models include measures of socioeconomic characteristics, racial composition, and school resources

School poverty and academic performance The racial/ethnic difference in exposure to school poverty is consistently the measure of segregation most strongly correlated with achievement gaps This is true in bivariate models and multivariate models And is true of changes in achievement gaps as well Coefficients are large: they imply that segregation is independently associated with 15-20% of racial achievement gaps Imply that school poverty is associated with achievement: a 20% difference in the proportion of poor classmates is associated with a 0.11-0.18 SD difference in achievement (in ~6 th grade) 0.009-0.014 SD difference in annual achievement growth (during 3-8 th grades)

School poverty and academic performance BUT these analyses do not identify segregation mechanisms They indicate that school poverty is the best proxy for, or is most proximal to, the operative mechanisms of segregation Other forms of segregation (residential, racial, between-district) may operate through differential exposure to school poverty These results do not imply peer effects (though they might): Highpoverty schools may be lower-quality for many reasons: hard to attract most skilled teachers; less parental social/political capital, lower peer achievement may affect curriculum/instruction, etc.)

Stanford Education Data Archive (SEDA) Available at http://seda.stanford.edu These data exist thanks to the following people: Ross Santy, Michael Hawes, Marilyn Seastrom (US Dept. of Education) Andrew Ho (Harvard University) Demetra Kalogrides, Kenneth Shores, Ben Shear, Erin Fahle (Stanford University) Funding support from Institute of Education Sciences Spencer Foundation William T. Grant Foundation Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Overdeck Family Foundation