Figure 9. Flow diagram describing the preparation of white and red wine from grapes (France).

Similar documents
Cherries. Three trials were carried out on cherries in Denmark

myclobutanil 987 MYCLOBUTANIL (181)

Cyprodinil CYPRODINIL (207)

TEBUFENOZIDE EXPLANATION

RESIDUE AND ANALYTICAL ASPECTS

ACEPHATE (095) [see also METHAMIDOPHOS]

The delicate art of wine making. Alfa Laval Foodec decanter centrifuges in the wine industry

WINE; OTHER ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; PREPARATION THEREOF (beer

Allergens in wine a specific detection of Casein, Egg and Lysozyme

Novozymes & Gusmer Enterprises WINE ENZYMES SOLUTIONS

Water Technologies & Solutions. wine processing. 21 st century membrane technology

GLUFOSINATE-AMMONIUM (175)

2,4-D (020) The 2001 Meeting received information on GAP and supervised residue trials for the postharvest use of 2,4-D on lemons and oranges.

AZINPHOS-METHYL (002)

5.24 ISOPYRAZAM (249)

BENOMYL (069) [See also CARBENDAZIM (072) and THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077)]

PROPICONAZOLE (160) The first draft was prepared by Professor M Lee, Andong National University, Republic of Korea

CAPTAN (007) Captan has been evaluated several times since the initial evaluation in 1965, most recently in 1994 (residues) and 1995 (toxicology).

Wine Treatments & Techniques

TRIADIMENOL (168) The first draft was prepared by Mr Christian Sieke, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

Summary of the project and objectives

th St, Maspeth, NY (800) madrose.com

CONCENTRATION OF AROMA AND VITAMIN RICH FRUIT JUICES BY COMPLEX MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY

Technical Data Sheet

THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077) [See also BENOMYL (069) and CARBENDAZIM (072)]

The generation of chlorantraniliprole residue data in beans, peas and sweet corn

Initial Grape Processing Mass Balance Calculations

Ballas Egg Products Corp. 40 North Second Street P.O. Box 2217 Zanesville, Ohio (740) FAX (740)

PYRIMETHANIL (226) The first draft was prepared by Dr Michael Doherty, Office of Pesticide Programs, United States Environmental Protection Agency

Enhanced Maturity Trial Wine Evaluation Isosceles Vineyard, Te Mata Estates Maraekakaho Rd, SH50, Hastings

ON-SITE TECHNICAL INFORMATION

PROCYMIDONE (136) The current recommended or registered use patterns are summarized in Table 1.

PYRAZOPHOS (153) Table 1. Pyrazophos - registered use rates and patterns. Nearly all formulations used are 30% EC; a very few are 15% WP mixtures.

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

CHEM Experiment 4 Introduction to Separation Techniques I. Objectives

BOSCALID (221) First draft prepared by Prof. Dr. Arpad Ambrus, Hungarian Food Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary

CODEX STANDARD FOR RAISINS CODEX STAN

Traditional Method Sparkling Winemaking

During this November trip 9 wineries have been visited 5 wineries had been audited in March and 4 were new to join the program.

Beer Preparation for Packaging. Jamie Ramshaw M.Brew Simpsons Malt

Introduction. 12 CO H 2 O = C 12 H 22 O O 2 carbon dioxide + water = sucrose + oxygen

Michael T. Frow Susan L. Kerr. ChE 4273 Dr. Miguel Bagajewicz

Part 1. Traditional Methods Part 2 Homebrew Techniques

PECTINASE Product Code: P129

Sticking and mold control. TIA Tech 2017 Los Angeles, California Steve Bright

LAST PART: LITTLE ROOM FOR CORRECTIONS IN THE CELLAR

Streptomycin Residues and Resistance. David Tanner GM Psa Innovation ZESPRI/KVH R&D Programme

HAND BOOK OF FOOD DEHYDRATION AND DRYING

LAB: One Tube Reaction Part 1

tebufenozide RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS

Evaluation of winemaking treatments in Australian Cabernet Sauvignon. Vintage trial 2018

LEHUI MICRO BREWERY EQUIPMENT 2009/ 8

Sequential Separation of Lysozyme, Ovomucin, Ovotransferrin and Ovalbumin from Egg White

IPRODIONE (111) EXPLANATION

Begerow Product Line. Fruit Juice & Fruit Wine Guide

Filtration and Beverage Treatment Products. Fruit Juice & Fruit Wine Guide

2.8 Bentonite fining. Chapter: Clarification page 19 of 38

Post-harvest prevention and remediation of ladybug taint

Winemaking and Sulfur Dioxide

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

Begerow Product Line. Fruit Juice & Fruit Wine Guide

EI ENDAL. Cultivar: Merlot

CONTINIOUS AND BATCH FLOTATION SYSTEMS FOR GRAPE JUICE CLARIFICATION. ETJEN BIZAJ PhD

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET: CALCIUM CHLORIDE FLAKE - LIQUOR TREATMENT

The C.W. Brabender 3-Phase-System Tools for Quality Control, Research and Development

Factors Affecting the Rising of Bread Dough - Ingredients

Cashew Value Chain. Cashew apple Juice. Cashew nut Processing Units. Cashew. Collection of Cashew nuts and Cashew apples. Trader. Drying of Cashew nut

THE DIVERSE FUNCTIONS OF OXYGEN 2 ND PART

Development of compost tea production method

NEW ZEALAND AVOCADO FRUIT QUALITY: THE IMPACT OF STORAGE TEMPERATURE AND MATURITY

Alternatives to bentonite - what's on the horizon

Product Name and Number: 2372 Hot & Spicy Document #: Revision Date: 03/05/2015 Revision #: 1.0 Revision Reason: New Form Reviser: JM

Pump solutions for the beverage industry.

Analytical Method for Coumaphos (Targeted to agricultural, animal and fishery products)

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

PROPOXUR (075) EXPLANATION

FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY (DFC) NOVEMBER EXAMINATION

TOKARA DIRECTOR S RESERVE RED 2007

Wastewater characteristics from Greek wineries and distilleries

Study of unintentional effects of plant protection products on fermentation processes and characteristics of wine

EXTRACTION PROCEDURE

Filtration and Beverage Treatment Products. Winemaker s Guide

Value Added Products from Apple Pomace

The Separation of a Mixture into Pure Substances

on organic wine making

THIABENDAZOLE (065) EXPLANATION

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Living Factories. Biotechnology SG Biology

AdvanTex Design Criteria

The Pall Oenofine XL System. Single Step Protein Stabilization and Clarification Eric Bosch Winery Engineers Association June 2012

Filtration Products. Winemaker s Guide

Pilot technology and equipment to produce baking yeast in shorter multiplication cycle

Tartrate Stability. Mavrik North America Bob Kreisher, Ph.D

2009 Australian & New Zealand Winemakers P/L

Managing Wine Faults and Taints

Late-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects

th St, Maspeth, NY (800) madrose.com

Comparison of three methods of packaging for the ageing/maturation of beef

Wine Preparation. Nate Starbard Gusmer Enterprises Davison Winery Supplies August, 2017

Transcription:

fenhexamid 263 Grapes, white Grapes, red Pressing Destemming, Crushing K 2 S Must Must Pectolytic Enzymes K 2 S Sugar Decanting Alcoholic Fermentation Yeast Alcoholic Fermentation Pressing Malolactic Bacteria Malolactic Fermentation K 2 S Clarification Gelatine K 2 S Filtration Metatartaric Acid Bottling Wine 1, white/red Storage for 6 month (12 C) Wine 2, white/red Figure 9. Flow diagram describing the preparation of white and red wine from grapes (France).

264 fenhexamid Berries Crushing K 2 S (NH 4 )PO 4 Must Yeast Fermentation (25 C) (7 days) Pressing / Mixing (2x at 20 psi for 3 min) Fermentation (25 C) Pomace, wet K 2 S Storage (2 C) Wine Figure 10. Flow diagram describing the preparation of wine and pomace, wet/marc (Australia). Grapes Juice preparation In France (1994) and Spain (1995) grapes were processed into juice, by simulating industrial practice on a laboratory scale (RA-3045/94, Nuesslein and Walz-Tylla, 1996; RA-3057/95, Nuesslein and Walz-Tylla, 1996). Fenhexamid was applied 3 times at a rate of 0.5 kg ai/ha corresponding to spray concentrations of 0.063-0.5% ai. Grape bunches were found to contain residues of 0.1-1.1 mg/kg on 21 days post-treatment. The processing procedure was the same for all studies (see Figure 12), but different matrices were analysed. A summary of the results is given in Table 49. The abbreviation PF is used for processing factor.

fenhexamid 265 In the USA grapes were processed to raw stewed juice, pasteurised juice, clarified juice and canned juice following a typical US commercial processing procedure (TMN-021R-1, Sehn, 1998). Vines were treated three times with 0.56 kg ai/ha fenhexamid (0.028-0.056% ai) and samples were taken immediately after treatment (day 0). The processing included the following steps: Crushing/destemming, depectination, pressing, pasteurisation, settling, filtration and canning (see Figure 13). The results are shown in detail in Table 49. In the Australian residue trials on grapes (DJR 191/00, Riches, 2000; PJH 315/00, Hamblin, 2000; RTL 539/00, Loveless, 2000), fenhexamid was applied once or twice with a spray concentration of 0.05 0.1%, corresponding to application rates between 1.95-2.1 or 3.9-4.15 kg ai/ha. Grapes for juice processing were sampled 0, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days after the last treatment. For analysis of fresh grapes, the sampled berries were chilled to approximately 80 C prior to blending. For juice production the berries were pressed twice, each at 20 psi for 3 min, with mixing of the skins between pressings. Sodium metabisulphite solution was added and the juice was stored at 2 C prior to analysis (see Figure 11). Juice produced in this way is similar to raw juice. Results are summarised in Table 50. The abbreviation PF is used for processing factor. Table 49. Results from studies on processing grapes to juice in Europe and the USA.. Country Commodity Portion analysed Fenhexamid residues PF Study No. (mg/kg) Trial SubID France grape, red bunch of grapes 1.1 RA-3045/94 juice 0.05 0.045 0185-94 pomace, wet 1.7 1.55 pomace, dried 2.7 2.45 France grape, white bunch of grapes 0.35 RA-3045/94 juice < 0.02 < 0.06 0186-94 pomace, wet 0.68 1.94 pomace, dried 1.8 5.14 Spain grape, white bunch of grapes 0.12 RA-3057/95 juice < 0.02 < 0.17 0087-95 raw stewed juice < 0.02 < 0.17 USA grape, red bunch of grapes 0.62 TMN-021R-1 raw stewed juice 0.16 0.26 T402-GRA97-217 juice, pasteurised 0.18 0.29 juice, clarified 0.084 0.14 juice, canned 0.086 0.14 Table 50. Results from studies on processing grapes to juice in Australia.

266 fenhexamid

fenhexamid 267

268 fenhexamid Commodity Portion analysed PHI Fenhexamid residues PF Study No. (days) (mg/kg) Trial SubID juice 0 14 21 28 35 6.34 3.46 4.35 5.60 3.60 0.65 0.30 0.76 0.78 0.54 mean 0.606 max 0.78 Berries K 2 S 2 O 5 Pressing / Mixing (2x at 20 psi for 3 min) Juice Figure 11. Flow diagram describing the preparation of juice from grapes (Australia).

fenhexamid 269 Grapes Destemming Stalk, Stems Water Washing Wash water Crushing Pressing Centrifugation Raw juice Pomance, wet Raw juice Heating (95 C, 30 seconds) Drying (60 C, < 10 % moisture) Depectinisation Pomace, dry Centrifugation Ultrafiltration Pasteurisation (90 C) Grape juice Figure 12. Flow diagram describing the preparation of juice from grapes (Europe).

270 fenhexamid Bunch of Grapes Crushing / Destemming Stalks, Stems Heating (61 C) Cytalase Enzyme Depectinisation (min. 40 minutes) Pressing raw stewed juice Pasteurisation 86 C Cooling 22 C pasteurised juice Pectolytic Enzyme Storage / Settling (4 weeks in refrigerator) Filtration clarified juice Heating 95 C Canning canned juice Figure 13. Flow diagram describing the preparation of juice from grapes (USA).

fenhexamid 271 Grapes Raisins Grapes from the field trials in Southern Europe (France and Spain) were also processed to raisins (RA-3045/94, Nuesslein and Walz-Tylla, 1996; RA-3057/95, Nuesslein and Walz-Tylla, 1996). Fenhexamid was applied three times at an application rate of 0.5 kg ai/ha. Samples were harvested 21 days after the final treatment. The preparation of raisins and raisin waste was according to current industrial procedures, but on a laboratory scale and to domestic practice (see Figure 14). The procedures are similar, differing only in the length of drying period (15 or 30 hours) and the moisture content of the raisins (7 8% versus 12 14%). A summary of the results is given in Table 51. The abbreviation PF is used for processing factor. Grapes from field trials in Australia were processed to raisins (DJR 192/00, Riches, 2000; MWS 450/00, Sumner, 2000). Fenhexamid was applied 1 or 2 times using spray concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1% ai (1.5 5.2 kg ai/ha). The berries were sampled and processed on days 14, 21, 28 and 35 after the last application. After picking, fruit samples were dried for 21 days in drying racks then frozen. All results are shown in Table 52. The abbreviation PF is used for processing factor. Table 51. Results from studies on processing grapes to raisins in Europe. Country Commodity Portion analysed Fenhexamid residues PF Study No. (mg/kg) Trial SubID France grape, red bunch of grapes 1.1 RA-3045/94 raisin 2.0 1.82 0185-94 raisin waste 7.3 6.64 France grape, white bunch of grapes 0.35 RA-3045/94 raisin 0.65 1.86 0186-94 raisin waste 5.70 16.3 Spain grape, white bunch of grapes 0.12 RA-3057/95 raisin 0.29 2.42 0087-95 Table 52. Results from studies on processing grapes to raisins in Australia.

272 fenhexamid Grapes Destemming Berries Stalk, Stems Drying (60-65 C, 15-30 hours, 7-14 % moisture) Drying (60-65 C, 30 hours) Washing Raisin, waste Raisin (15-20 % moisture) Figure 14. Flow diagram describing the preparation of raisins from grapes.