The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets

Similar documents
The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India

Panel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm. t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.

Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix

The Bank Lending Channel of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Euro-area bank-level Analysis

Appendix Table A1 Number of years since deregulation

Internet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors

Financing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect

DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH

This appendix tabulates results summarized in Section IV of our paper, and also reports the results of additional tests.

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

Internet Appendix for CEO Personal Risk-taking and Corporate Policies TABLE IA.1 Pilot CEOs and Firm Risk (Controlling for High Performance Pay)

"Primary agricultural commodity trade and labour market outcome

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND VINEYARDS IN NAPA COUNTY

Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Volume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa

$ BUY STARBUCKS CORPORATION (SBUX) Rena Kaufman. Valuation Methodology. Market Data. Financial Summary (7/1/2018) Profile. Financial Analysis

Online Appendix to The Effect of Liquidity on Governance

Internet Appendix to. The Price of Street Friends: Social Networks, Informed Trading, and Shareholder Costs. Jie Cai Ralph A.

November K. J. Martijn Cremers Lubomir P. Litov Simone M. Sepe

Online Appendix for. To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market

The Effects of Presidential Politics on CEO Compensation

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

Syndication, Interconnectedness, and Systemic Risk

Investment Wines. - Risk Analysis. Prepared by: Michael Shortell & Adiam Woldetensae Date: 06/09/2015

The Sources of Risk Spillovers among REITs: Asset Similarities and Regional Proximity

1/17/manufacturing-jobs-used-to-pay-really-well-notanymore-e/

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Appendix A. Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability

Bank Risk during the Financial Crisis: Do business models matter?

Online Appendix to Voluntary Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 Securities Offering Reform

Trade Integration and Method of Payments in International Transactions

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Peet's Coffee & Tea, Inc. Reports 62% Increase in Second Quarter 2008 Diluted Earnings Per Share

The role of non-performing loans in the transmission of monetary policy

CHAPTER I BACKGROUND

PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MERGER WAVES

Fiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries

STARBUCKS CORPORATION

ICC September 2018 Original: English. Emerging coffee markets: South and East Asia

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

Can Belgian Firms cope with the Chinese Dragon and the Asian Tigers? The Export Performance of Multiproduct Firms on Foreign Markets

Online Appendix. for. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure

The Impact of Government Interventions on CDS and Equity Markets

Nestlé Investor Seminar 2014

Internet Appendix for Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? *

ICT Use and Exports. Patricia Kotnik, Eva Hagsten. This is a working draft. Please do not cite or quote without permission of the authors.

Brazil Milk Cow Numbers and Milk Production per Cow,

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

Tariff vs non tariff barriers in seafood trade

Ontario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study

ONE YEAR ANNUAL RESULTS FONTERRA FONTERRA CO-OPERAT CO-OPERA IVE GROUP LTD

Online Appendix for. Inattention and Inertia in Household Finance: Evidence from the Danish Mortgage Market,

Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry in and for Reduced Production

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Preview. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Evolving Consumption Patterns and Free Trade Agreements: Impacts on Global Wine Markets by 2020

More information at Global and Chinese Pressure Seal Machines Industry, 2018 Market Research Report

Ontario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERALL, WE FOUND THAT:

Firm structure, reporting incentives and international accounting research

What does radical price change and choice reveal?

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Australian Vintage Ltd. December 2017 Half Year Results 21 st February 2018

Change in the Distribution of Sale/Rental Prices: Comparison of Beijing and Tokyo

Nuclear reactors construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress

Asian Containerboard Markets

Western Uganda s Arabica Opportunity. Kampala 20 th March, 2018

Debt and Debt Management among Older Adults

Tourism and HSR in Spain. Does the AVE increase local visitors?

Red wine consumption in the new world and the old world

Export Spillover and Export Performance in China

Three-month sales April 20, 2017 Nestlé three-month sales 2017

North Carolina Exports by Quarter (in constant 2Q 2013 dollars)

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

MEASURING THE OPPORTUNITY COSTS OF TRADE-RELATED CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of Eco-certification on the Performance of German Wineries. Patrizia Fanasch University of Paderborn, Germany

Relationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

January 2015 WORLD GRAPE MARKET SUPPLY, DEMAND AND FORECAST

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

The connoisseurs choice for a portfolio with Fine French Wines

TOPIC 12. Motivation for Trade. Tuesday, March 27, 12

More information from: global-online-food-delivery-and-takeaway-marketanalysis-by-order-type

TRADE AS A % OF GDP VS GDP PER CAPITA (LANDLOCKED DEVELOPING COUNTRIES) MOLDOVA UZBEKISTAN

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Top 10 financial planning mistakes

Data Science and Service Research Discussion Paper

Effects of Election Results on Stock Price Performance: Evidence from 1976 to 2008

Results April 2019

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRY AND COMPANY

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

China: The Untapped Freighter Market

Team Harvard Ecureuils Harvard University

Export market trends and outlook

Investment of private firms and the stock price of public industry peers

Great Expectations or Side Effects? Bankruptcy Law Reforms and Bank Credit for SMEs. Marco Ghitti London, 24th March 2015

Transcription:

The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets Tatiana Didier Sergio Schmukler Dec. 12-13, 2012 NIPFP-DEA-JIMF Conference Macro and Financial Challenges of Emerging China and India Neemrana, India

Motivation China and India have risen as world economic powers China s GDP has grown more than twenty-fold in real terms since 1978 India has expanded 6.5 times between 1978 and 2011 Even though they both have more than one billion people each China s and India s financial systems have also developed rapidly Stock mkt capitalization rose from 4% of GDP in 1992 to 80% in 2010 China From 22% to 96% in India Non-bank institutional investors are playing a more central role

Motivation: This paper How broad-based is the financing in capital markets? Bond and equity markets Domestic and foreign markets Which firms from China and India have used and have benefited from the expansion in capital markets? Is the use of capital markets associated with firm performance? Implications of the patterns on firm size and growth for the firm size distribution (FSD) across publicly listed firms Implications for the role of capital markets

Summary of findings The expansion of financial activity has been much more limited than aggregate numbers suggest Few firms use capital market financing Even fewer firms get the bulk of the financing activity Firms using capital markets are different than other listed firms Large firms are the ones that use capital markets as a source of financing They grow faster just before and during the year of issue They also increase their capital expenditures and expand the debt maturity These differences are observed ex-ante and become more accentuated ex-post the capital raising activity FSD shifts more over time for firms that raise capital than for those that do not

Motivation: Related literature Positive relation between financial development growth Relation between law, finance, and growth literature China and India as counter-examples Gibrat s law Firm size and growth are independent FSD is stable over time Financial constraints and their effects on firms

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

Data Data coverage for capital raising activity from SDC Platinum 3,884 firms raising capital in China 6,483 firms raising capital in India 11,156 equity issues from 1991 to 2010 6,929 bond issues from 2000 to 2010 Balance sheet data for listed firms from Bureau van Dijk Orbis Data coverage from 2003 to 2010 We exclude firms that only had an IPO and no other capital raising activity 2,457 firms from China 4,301 firms from India For capital expenditures, TRs Worldscope database (different coverage) We match both datasets 1,915 Chinese firms and 3,427 Indian firms didn t raise capital between 2003-2010

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

% of GDP Financial markets have developed since 1990 300% Size of Domestic Financial System Financial Systems as a % of GDP Banks Bonds Equity 250% 91% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% 39% 50% 89% 24% 19% 5% 10% 36% 6% 42% 128% 132% 26% 33% 30% 101% 88% 20% 20% 52% 35% 36% 70% 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Note: Total claims of the banking system, market capitalization of outstanding bonds, and equity market capitalization as a percentage of GDP. Source: IFS, BIS, and WDI.

% of Domestic Financial System Shift away from bank-based model Size of Domestic Financial Systems As a % of Total Domestic Financial Systems Banks Bonds Equity 100% 90% 80% 70% 6% 6% 14% 8% 20% 12% 35% 33% 37% 31% 45% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 89% 78% 67% 18% 24% 26% 23% 47% 43% 40% 44% 20% 35% 10% 0% 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Total claims of the banking system, market capitalization of outstanding bonds, and equity market capitalization as a percentage of the total domestic financial system. Source: IFS, BIS, and WDI.

% of GDP Equity issuance surged in late 2000s, after decline 2.5% Issuance Activity in Equity Markets Amount raised as a % of GDP Domestic Foreign: Hong Kong Foreign 2.0% 0.2% 1.5% 0.1% 0.9% 0.4% 0.2% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.1% 1991-1994 0.0% 0.1% 0.7% 1995-1999 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 2000-2004 1.0% 2005-2010 0.4% 0.4% 1991-1994 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 1995-1999 2000-2004 1.3% 2005-2010 China India Note: foreign markets for China are split into Hong Kong and others. Sources: SDC Platinum.

% of GDP Even when considering non-financial firms only Issuance Activity in Equity Markets Amount raised as a % of GDP Financial Non-Financial 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.2% 1.0% 1.1% 1.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.2% 1991-1994 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 1995-1999 2000-2004 0.9% 2005-2010 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1991-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 0.6% 2005-2010 China India Note: firms are classified as financial according to their 2-digit SIC code. Sources: SDC Platinum.

Number of Firms Listed firms grew in China, but remain few compared to India Number of Listed Firms in Domestic Equity Markets 7,000 6,000 5,793 5,551 5,000 4,885 4,000 3,000 3,090 2,000 1,232 1,621 1,000 686 135 0 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Source: WDI.

Number of Firms Few firms issue equity each year 600 Number of Firms Issuing Equity per Year in Domestic and Foreign Markets Domestic Foreign (Incl. Hong Kong) 500 16 5 400 300 534 528 200 100 0 10 74 1991-1994 13 122 1995-1999 34 117 87 105 2000-2004 2005-2010 1991-1994 1995-1999 5 52 2000-2004 18 152 2005-2010 China India Source: SDC Platinum.

Number of Firms and even fewer are SEOs Number of Firms Issuing Equity per Year in Domestic and Foreign Markets IPO SEO 600 500 38 21 400 300 509 511 200 87 100 0 7 74 1991-1994 14 12 121 109 1995-1999 2000-2004 136 2005-2010 1991-1994 1995-1999 18 39 2000-2004 90 80 2005-2010 China India Source: SDC Platinum.

% of Total Amount Raised the top 10 issuing firms capture a big fraction Concentration in Domestic Equity Markets Amount raised by top 10 issuers as a percentage of total amount raised 100% 90% 88% 80% 74% 70% 60% 50% 55% 49% 62% 56% 40% 30% 20% 10% 33% 32% 0% 1991-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 1991-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Sources: SDC Platinum.

% of GDP Local bond market issuance activity expanded recently, becoming comparable to equity Issuance Activity in Bond Markets Amount raised as a % of GDP Domestic Foreign: Hong Kong Foreign 3.0% 2.5% 0.5% 2.0% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0% 1.6% 0.2% 2.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.2% 2000-2004 2005-2010 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Note: foreign markets for China are split into Hong Kong and Others. Sources: SDC Platinum.

% of GDP for financial as well as non-financial firms Issuance Activity in Bond Markets Amount raised as a % of GDP 3.0% Financial Non-Financial 2.5% 0.8% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.3% 2.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6% 0.1% 2000-2004 2005-2010 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Note: firms as classified as financial using their 2-digit SIC code. Sources: SDC Platinum.

Number of Firms Number of firms issuing bonds rose considerably Number of Firms Issuing Bonds per Year in Domestic and Foreign Markets Domestic Foreign (Incl. Hong Kong) 225 200 175 45 150 125 100 75 20 6 155 50 94 86 25 0 5 9 2000-2004 2005-2010 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Source: SDC Platinum.

% of Total Amount Raised but also concentrated Concentration in Domestic Bond Markets 100% 90% Amount raised by top 10 issuers as a percentage of total amount raised 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 43% 43% 49% 20% 10% 0% 2000-2004 2005-2010 2000-2004 2005-2010 China India Source: SDC Platinum.

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

Firms that issue differ from those that don t Firm Characteristics in China Firms with Firm Characteristics No Issues Equity Issues Bond Issues Size Total Assets 214,271 443,289 *** 1,223,531 *** Sales 122,237 255,071 *** 505,218 *** Employees 1,368 2,527 *** 4,137 *** Growth Asset Growth 9.42% 18.72% *** 18.12% *** Sales Growth 15.64% 20.96% *** 20.21% *** Employee Growth 0.56% 5.37% *** 4.84% *** Capital Structure and Financial Health Long-Term Debt/Total Liabilities 2.64% 8.49% *** 22.31% *** Leverage 53.58% 56.17% *** 60.53% *** Retained Earnings/Total Assets 6.77% 8.28% *** 8.65% *** Profitability ROA 4.14% 4.83% *** 5.24% *** No. of Firms (Orbis database) 1,915 425 194 Investment Capital Expenditures 6,628 16,233 *** 52,840 *** Capital Expenditures/Sales 5.84% 8.13% *** 10.22% *** No. of Firms (Worldscope database) 2,235 615 224 Note: The figures are calculated as the median across all firms of the median for each firm for 2003-2010. Total assets, sales, and capital expenditures are in thousands of 2011 USD. Sources: SDC Platinum, Orbis, and Worldscope.

Firms that issue differ from those that don t Firm Characteristics in India Firms with Firm Characteristics No Issues Equity Issues Bond Issues Size Total Assets 8,968 55,491 *** 593,622 *** Sales 9,519 41,925 *** 272,083 *** Employees 837 2,700 *** 4,600 *** Growth Asset Growth 5.25% 15.76% *** 18.24% *** Sales Growth 9.82% 17.36% *** 17.60% *** Employee Growth 0.96% 3.62% *** 4.35% *** Capital Structure and Financial Health Long-Term Debt/Total Liabilities 49.49% 56.76% *** 62.95% *** Leverage 52.46% 62.16% *** 64.39% *** Retained Earnings/Total Assets 3.68% 4.98% *** 7.08% *** Profitability ROA 2.58% 3.61% *** 5.13% *** No. of Firms (Orbis database) 3,427 Investment Capital Expenditures 1,754 4,930 *** 18,837 *** Capital Expenditures/Sales 4.39% 6.40% *** 7.46% *** 725 289 No. of Firms (Worldscope database) 1,848 601 281 Note: The figures are calculated as the median across all firms of the median for each firm for 2003-2010. Total assets, sales,and capital expenditures are in thousands of 2011 USD. Sources: SDC Platinum, Orbis, and Worldscope.

Note: the first three columns report Cox estimates of the hazard ratio of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010. The next three columns report Probit estimates of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010 as a function of firm characteristics in 2004. Sources: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Firms that are larger and grow more are more likely to issue equity or bonds Probability of Capital Raising Activity in China Cox Regressions Probit Regressions Equity or Equity or Independent Variables Equity Bonds Bonds Equity Bonds Bonds Size Total Assets 1.579 *** 2.077 *** 1.652 *** 0.049 0.461 *** 0.173 *** (0.067) (0.130) (0.066) (0.050) (0.066) (0.048) Growth Asset Growth 1.013 *** 1.000 1.011 *** 0.005 *** -0.002 0.004 ** (0.001) (0.002) (0.001) (0.002) (0.002) (0.002) Capital Structure and Financial Health Long-Term Debt / Total Liabilities 1.846 * 32.110 *** 3.653 *** -0.330 0.859 ** 0.020 (0.594) (13.200) (0.973) (0.304) (0.343) (0.280) Leverage 0.167 *** 3.925 ** 0.299 *** 0.843 *** 0.604 0.764 *** (0.046) (2.210) (0.080) (0.269) (0.378) (0.262) Retained Earnings / Total Assets 1.232 29.190 1.733 0.709 *** 0.120 0.568 ** (0.397) (68.090) (0.771) (0.238) (0.314) (0.225) Profitability ROA 0.976 *** 1.003 0.984 ** 0.022 *** 0.032 ** 0.024 *** (0.008) (0.022) (0.008) (0.008) (0.014) (0.008) Constant -2.217 *** -7.995 *** -3.601 *** (0.602) (0.875) (0.587) No. of Observations 11,597 12,040 11,297 1,171 1,171 1,171

Note: the first three columns report Cox estimates of the hazard ratio of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010. The next three columns report Probit estimates of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010 as a function of firm characteristics in 2004. Sources: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Firms that are larger and grow more are more likely to issue equity or bonds Probability of Capital Raising Activity in China A one standard deviation Cox increase Regressions Probit Regressions in the log of total assets raises the Equity or A one standard deviation Equity or Independent Variables baseline probability Equity of issuing Bonds by Bonds Equity increase in the Bonds growth rate of Bonds Size 83%. assets raises the baseline Total Assets 1.579 *** 2.077 *** 1.652 *** 0.049 probability of 0.461 issuing *** by 0.173 *** (0.067) (0.130) (0.066) (0.050) 40%. (0.066) (0.048) Growth Asset Growth 1.013 *** 1.000 1.011 *** 0.005 *** -0.002 0.004 ** (0.001) (0.002) (0.001) (0.002) (0.002) (0.002) Capital Structure and Financial Health Long-Term Debt / Total Liabilities 1.846 * 32.110 *** 3.653 *** -0.330 0.859 ** 0.020 (0.594) (13.200) (0.973) (0.304) (0.343) (0.280) Leverage 0.167 *** 3.925 ** 0.299 *** 0.843 *** 0.604 0.764 *** (0.046) (2.210) (0.080) (0.269) (0.378) (0.262) Retained Earnings / Total Assets 1.232 29.190 1.733 0.709 *** 0.120 0.568 ** (0.397) (68.090) (0.771) (0.238) (0.314) (0.225) Profitability ROA 0.976 *** 1.003 0.984 ** 0.022 *** 0.032 ** 0.024 *** (0.008) (0.022) (0.008) (0.008) (0.014) (0.008) Constant -2.217 *** -7.995 *** -3.601 *** (0.602) (0.875) (0.587) No. of Observations 11,597 12,040 11,297 1,171 1,171 1,171

Note: the first three columns report Cox estimates of the hazard ratio of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010. The next three columns report Probit estimates of capital raising activity between 2005 and 2010 as a function of firm characteristics in 2004. Sources: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Firms that are larger and grow more are more likely to issue equity or bonds Probability of Capital Raising Activity in India Cox Regressions Probit Regressions Independent Variables Equity Bonds Size Sales 1.335 *** 2.363 *** 1.466 *** 0.078 *** 0.419 *** 0.167 *** (0.036) (0.136) (0.040) (0.025) (0.067) (0.028) Growth Sales Growth 1.001 A *** one std. 1.000 dev. increase 1.001 in *** 0.000 0.001 *** 0.000 (0.000) total sales (0.000) raises (0.000) the (0.000) (0.001) (0.000) Capital Structure and Financial Health likelihood of issuing by 2.3 Long-Term Debt / Total Liabilities 2.174 percentage *** 59.890 points. *** 3.809 *** 0.845 *** 1.544 *** 1.159 *** (0.404) (28.530) (0.714) (0.190) (0.311) (0.193) Leverage 0.437 *** 2.563 * 0.467 *** -0.079-0.423-0.327 * (0.080) (1.445) (0.081) (0.192) (0.349) (0.187) Retained Earnings / Total Assets 0.927 3.398 ** 0.911 0.120 0.138-0.046 (0.063) (1.967) (0.065) (0.183) (0.309) (0.163) Profitability ROA 0.972 *** 1.015 0.981 *** -0.008 0.008-0.003 (0.005) (0.011) (0.005) (0.006) (0.007) (0.006) Constant -1.683 *** -6.177 *** -2.485 *** (0.250) (0.808) (0.294) No. of Observations Equity or Bonds Equity Bonds 13,978 14,321 13,459 1,050 1,050 Equity or Bonds 1,050

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

Note: regressions of firm characteristics on a three-year window around capital raising issues. Regressions include non-issuing firms as a control group. Total assets and sales are in logs of thousands 2011 USD. Top and bottom 1% of observations is dropped. Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Equity issuers are larger and become larger Firm Dynamics around Issuance Activity China - Equity India - Equity Total Assets Sales Employees Total Assets Sales Employees Independent Variables Year before Issue 0.338 *** 0.450 *** 1,014 *** 0.933 *** 0.862 *** 3,164 (0.068) (0.082) (381) (0.099) (0.106) (2,676) Issue Year 0.840 *** 0.763 *** 2,613 *** 1.729 *** 1.550 *** 1,956 (0.063) (0.074) (455) (0.092) (0.100) (2,299) Year after Issue 1.195 *** 1.212 *** 5,871 *** 2.145 *** 1.691 *** 3,765 * (0.088) (0.098) (917) (0.132) (0.127) (1,934) Constant 10.950 *** 10.170 *** 218 9.680 *** 6.633 *** 621 *** (0.375) (0.063) (136) (1.229) (2.378) (104) F-Tests: Issue Year vs. Year Before 0.502 *** 0.313 *** 1,599 *** 0.796 *** 0.688 *** -1,208 Year After vs. Issue Year 0.355 *** 0.449 *** 3,258 *** 0.416 *** 0.141 1,809 Year After vs. Year Before 0.857 *** 0.762 *** 4,857 *** 1.212 *** 0.829 *** 601 Year Dummies Industry Dummies No. of Observations R-Squared No. of Firms Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 15,003 14,826 13,847 26,289 21,602 980 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.05 2,419 2,409 2,402 4,207 3,519 361

Note: regressions of firm characteristics on a three-year window around capital raising issues. Regressions include non-issuing firms as a control group. Total assets and sales are in logs of thousands 2011 USD. Top and bottom 1% of observations is dropped. Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Equity issuers are larger and become larger Firm Dynamics around Issuance Activity China - Equity India - Equity Total Assets Sales Employees Total Assets Sales Employees Independent Variables Firms issuing equity Firms issuing equity Year before Issue 0.338 *** 0.450 are *** 40% larger 1,014 *** than 0.933 *** 0.862 are 150% *** larger 3,164 than (0.068) (0.082) control group (381) the year (0.099) (0.106) control group (2,676) the year Issue Year 0.840 *** 0.763 before *** the issue. 2,613 *** 1.729 *** 1.550 before *** the issue. 1,956 (0.063) (0.074) (455) (0.092) (0.100) (2,299) Year after Issue 1.195 *** 1.212 *** 5,871 *** 2.145 *** 1.691 *** 3,765 * (0.088) (0.098) (917) (0.132) (0.127) (1,934) Constant 10.950 *** 10.170 *** 218 9.680 *** 6.633 *** 621 *** (0.375) (0.063) (136) (1.229) (2.378) (104) F-Tests: Issue Year vs. Year Before 0.502 *** 0.313 *** 1,599 *** 0.796 *** 0.688 *** -1,208 Year After vs. Issue Year 0.355 *** 0.449 *** 3,258 *** 0.416 *** 0.141 1,809 Year After vs. Year Before 0.857 *** 0.762 *** 4,857 *** 1.212 *** 0.829 *** 601 Year Dummies Industry Dummies No. of Observations R-Squared No. of Firms Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 15,003 14,826 13,847 26,289 21,602 980 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.05 2,419 2,409 2,402 4,207 3,519 361

Note: regressions of firm characteristics on a three-year window around capital raising issues. Regressions include non-issuing firms as a control group. Total assets and sales are in logs of thousands 2011 USD. Top and bottom 1% of observations is dropped. Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Issuing firms also grow more before and on impact Firm Dynamics around Issuance Activity China - Equity India - Equity Asset Growth Sales Growth Employee Growth Asset Growth Sales Growth Employee Growth Independent Variables Year before Issue 7.967 *** 8.582 *** 7.476 *** 16.200 *** 13.890 *** 8.942 ** (0.976) (1.334) (2.003) (1.324) (4.012) (4.129) Issue Year 30.870 *** 11.440 *** 12.490 *** 28.530 *** 14.900 ** 5.546 (1.865) (2.344) (3.221) (2.635) (5.955) (5.294) Year after Issue 1.523 1.425 4.264 ** 7.889 *** (7.642) *** 2.717 (1.123) (1.368) (2.091) (1.237) (2.509) (2.914) Constant 35.980 *** 42.190 *** 17.030 *** (12.42) 68.780 1.302 (9.557) (15.38) (0.951) (16.71) (64.59) (3.741) F-Tests: Issue Year vs. Year Before 22.903 *** 2.858 5.014 12.330 *** 1.010 (3.396) Year After vs. Issue Year -29.347 *** -10.015 *** (8.226) ** -20.641 *** -22.542 *** (2.829) Year After vs. Year Before -6.444 *** -7.157 *** (3.212) -8.311 *** -21.532 *** (6.225) Year Dummies Industry Dummies No. of Observations R-Squared No. of Firms Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 13,409 13,184 11,913 21,973 17,895 585 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.13 0.03 0.07 2,448 2,419 2,000 4,222 3,403 202

Note: regressions of firm characteristics on a three-year window around capital raising issues. Regressions include non-issuing firms as a control group. Total assets and sales are in logs of thousands 2011 USD. Top and bottom 1% of observations is dropped. Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Issuing firms also grow more before and on impact Firm Dynamics around Issuance Activity China - Equity India - Equity Asset Growth Sales Growth Employee Growth Asset Growth Sales Growth Employee Growth Independent Variables The year before Year before Issue 7.967 *** 8.582 *** 7.476 *** 16.200 *** 13.890 *** The year 8.942 before ** issuing, firms grow (0.976) (1.334) (2.003) (1.324) (4.012) issuing, (4.129) firms grow 8% more than Issue Year 30.870 *** 11.440 *** 12.490 *** 28.530 *** 14.900 ** 16% more 5.546 than control group. (1.865) (2.344) (3.221) (2.635) (5.955) control group. (5.294) Year after Issue 1.523 1.425 4.264 ** 7.889 *** (7.642) *** 2.717 The year of issue The year of issue (1.123) (1.368) they (2.091) grow 31% (1.237) (2.509) (2.914) they grow 29% Constant 35.980 *** 42.190 *** more 17.030 than *** non- (12.42) 68.780 1.302 more than control (9.557) (15.38) control (0.951) group. (16.71) (64.59) (3.741) group. F-Tests: Issue Year vs. Year Before 22.903 *** 2.858 5.014 12.330 *** 1.010 (3.396) Year After vs. Issue Year -29.347 *** -10.015 *** (8.226) ** -20.641 *** -22.542 *** (2.829) Year After vs. Year Before -6.444 *** -7.157 *** (3.212) -8.311 *** -21.532 *** (6.225) Year Dummies Industry Dummies No. of Observations R-Squared No. of Firms Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 13,409 13,184 11,913 21,973 17,895 585 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.13 0.03 0.07 2,448 2,419 2,000 4,222 3,403 202

Presentation 1. Motivation 2. Data 3. Capital Market Development and Firm Financing 3.1. Expansion of Capital Markets 3.2. Use of Capital Markets 4. Firm Dynamics and Use of Capital Markets 4.1. Which Firms Use Capital Markets? 4.2. Use of Markets and Firm Dynamics 4.3. Implications for Firm Size Distribution 5. Conclusions

Firms issuing equity are larger than non-issuers and grow more Firm Size Distribution by Issuance Activity 2003 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2003 Total Assets of Issuing Companies China Equity Issues 2010 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2010 Total Assets of Issuing Companies Log of Total Assets Note: a firm is considered as issuing if it had at least one equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Only firms with data in both years are included in the figures. The kernel is Gaussian with a band width of 1.5. Sources: Orbis and SDC Platinum.

Firms issuing equity are larger than non-issuers and grow more Firm Size Distribution by Issuance Activity 2003 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2003 Total Assets of Issuing Companies India Equity Issues 2010 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2010 Total Assets of Issuing Companies Log of Total Assets Note: a firm is considered as issuing if it had at least one equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Only firms with data in both years are included in the figures. The kernel is Gaussian with a band width of 1.5. Sources: Orbis and SDC Platinum.

For bond issuers, the results are starker Firm Size Distribution by Issuance Activity 2003 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2003 Total Assets of Issuing Companies China Bond Issues 2010 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2010 Total Assets of Issuing Companies Log of Total Assets Note: a firm is considered as issuing if it had at least one equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Only firms with data in both years are included in the figures. The kernel is Gaussian with a band width of 1.5. Sources: Orbis and SDC Platinum.

more so in India Firm Size Distribution by Issuance Activity 2003 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2003 Total Assets of Issuing Companies India Bond Issues 2010 Total Assets of Non-Issuing Companies 2010 Total Assets of Issuing Companies Log of Total Assets Note: a firm is considered as issuing if it had at least one equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Only firms with data in both years are included in the figures. The kernel is Gaussian with a band width of 1.5. Sources: Orbis and SDC Platinum.

Note: quantile and mean regressions of total assets on a constant, a dummy for 2010, a dummy for issuing firms, and an interaction term with these two dummies. Dependent variable pools data on total assets in 2003 and 2010. Firms with no issues had no equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. FSD shifts more users than for non-users Quantile Regressions of Total Assets China - Equity Independent Variables 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% Mean Issuers 0.252 0.218 ** 0.225 ** 0.272 *** 0.591 *** 0.288 *** (0.163) (0.099) (0.094) (0.095) (0.163) (0.083) Y2010 0.218 ** 0.410 *** 0.570 *** 0.756 *** 1.000 *** 0.602 *** (0.109) (0.066) (0.063) (0.064) (0.109) (0.056) Issuers*Y2010 0.985 *** 0.857 *** 0.796 *** 0.692 *** 0.642 *** 0.780 *** (0.229) (0.139) (0.132) (0.134) (0.230) (0.117) Constant 11.010 *** 11.720 *** 12.150 *** 12.530 *** 13.240 *** 12.140 *** (0.084) (0.051) (0.048) (0.049) (0.084) (0.043) No. of Observations R-squared 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,202 0.209 Independent Variables Issuers 1.010 *** 1.110 *** 0.954 *** 70% 1.026 *** 90% 1.994 *** Mean 0.767 *** (0.198) (0.174) (0.167) (0.175) (0.268) (0.131) Y2010-0.047 0.358 *** 0.513 *** 0.666 *** 0.778 *** 0.551 *** (0.128) (0.113) (0.108) (0.113) (0.173) (0.086) Issuers*Y2010 0.919 *** 0.453 * 0.623 *** 0.809 *** 0.291 0.732 *** (0.279) (0.245) (0.236) (0.247) (0.378) (0.186) Constant 7.573 *** 8.786 *** 9.786 *** 10.740 *** 12.040 *** 9.970 *** (0.104) (0.092) (0.088) (0.092) (0.141) (0.068) No. of Observations R-squared India - Equity 10% 30% 50% 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,393 0.173

Note: quantile and mean regressions of total assets on a constant, a dummy for 2010, a dummy for issuing firms, and an interaction term with these two dummies. Dependent variable pools data on total assets in 2003 and 2010. Firms with no issues had no equity issue between 2003 and 2010. Source: SDC Platinum and Orbis. FSD shifts more users than for non-users Quantile Regressions of Total Assets China - Equity Independent Variables 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% Mean Issuers 0.252 0.218 ** 0.225 ** 0.272 *** 0.591 *** 0.288 *** (0.163) (0.099) (0.094) (0.095) (0.163) (0.083) Y2010 0.218 ** 0.410 *** At the 0.570 10 th *** decile of 0.756 manufacturing *** 1.000 firms *** in China: 0.602 *** (0.109) (0.066) (0.063) (0.064) (0.109) (0.056) Issuers*Y2010 0.985 *** 0.857 *** Non-users 0.796 *** had US$ 0.692 60 *** million in 0.642 total *** assets in 0.780 2003. *** (0.229) (0.139) Equity (0.132) issuers had (0.134) US$ 77 million (0.230) in assets in (0.117) 2003. Constant 11.010 *** 11.720 *** Both 12.150 issuers *** and 12.530 non-issuers *** grew 13.240 between *** 12.140 2003 and *** 2010. (0.084) (0.051) But (0.048) issuers had (0.049) an additional (0.084) 170% expansion (0.043) of assets than that observed for non-issuers (or $162 million). No. of Observations 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,254 2,202 R-squared 0.209 India - Equity Independent Variables 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% Mean Issuers 1.010 *** 1.110 *** 0.954 *** 1.026 *** 1.994 *** 0.767 *** (0.198) (0.174) (0.167) (0.175) (0.268) (0.131) Y2010-0.047 0.358 *** 0.513 *** 0.666 *** 0.778 *** 0.551 *** (0.128) (0.113) (0.108) (0.113) (0.173) (0.086) Issuers*Y2010 0.919 *** 0.453 * 0.623 *** 0.809 *** 0.291 0.732 *** (0.279) (0.245) (0.236) (0.247) (0.378) (0.186) Constant 7.573 *** 8.786 *** 9.786 *** 10.740 *** 12.040 *** 9.970 *** (0.104) (0.092) (0.088) (0.092) (0.141) (0.068) No. of Observations R-squared 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,393 0.173

Note: total assets and sales are in logs of 2011 U.S. dollars. A firms is considered an equity (bond) issuer if it had at least one equity (bond) issue during the 2004-2010 period. Firms with an IPO and no other capital raising during that period are excluded from the sample. Only firms with data for both years are included. Sources: SDC Platinum and Orbis. Financial markets affect the evolution of the FSD Tests of Equality of Distributions Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests Panel A. China Total Assets Sales 2003 2010 2003 2010 Equity Market Users vs. Non-Users 0.128 *** 0.367 *** 0.143 *** 0.321 *** Bond Market Users vs. Non-Users 0.413 *** 0.591 *** 0.314 *** 0.456 *** Equity Market Users vs. All Firms 0.083 0.260 *** 0.102 ** 0.231 *** Bond Market Users vs. All Firms 0.363 *** 0.490 *** 0.274 *** 0.369 *** Non-Users vs. All Firms 0.052 0.107 *** 0.046 0.090 *** Panel B. India Total Assets Sales 2003 2010 2003 2010 Equity Market Users vs. Non-Users 0.250 *** 0.321 *** 0.214 *** 0.290 *** Bond Market Users vs. Non-Users 0.676 *** 0.737 *** 0.586 *** 0.658 *** Equity Market Users vs. All Firms 0.172 *** 0.231 *** 0.157 *** 0.207 *** Bond Market Users vs. All Firms 0.603 *** 0.647 *** 0.542 *** 0.605 *** Non-Users vs. All Firms 0.079 *** 0.096 *** 0.072 *** 0.086 ***

Messages are robust to alternative specifications Use of sales vs. assets for firm size and growth Financial vs. non-financial firms State-owned vs. non-state-owned firms Expansion of the window around issuance, using all years before and after issuance Firm fixed effects

Conclusions The expansion of financial activity has been much more limited than aggregate numbers suggest Few firms receive capital market financing Even fewer firms receive the bulk of financing Firms using capital markets are different than other firms Large firms are the ones that have access They grow faster just before and during the year of issue They also increase their capital expenditures and expand debt maturity FSD shifts more over time for firms that raise capital than for those that do not

Conclusions Finance matters, but differently than expected Firms that raise capital seem to benefit from it Even large firms seem to be partly financially constrained But more work is required on exploring financial constrains What drives the changes in firm dynamics around issuance? Supply side? Frictions in the financial system typically affect which firms obtain financing Demand side? Firms growing more rapidly just before issuing suggests that more business opportunities might propel them to raise capital Capital market development and access for corporations Expanding capital markets typically help the largest firms Effect on smaller firms is still needs to be understood and quantified

Thank you!