Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos, Lao PDR 3

Similar documents
Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology

Preparation of a malt beverage from different rice varieties

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Silage Forage Quality Using Inoculants and Packing. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Annual Grasses Preserved as Silage: Fermentation Characteristics, Nutritive Value, and Quality

ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

Net Energy of Sweet Corn Husk and Cob Silage Calculated from Digestibility in Cows

Effects of Ground Ear Corn vs. Ear Corn Silage on Rumen Fatty Acid Content

Factors Affecting the Quality Silage After Harvest. Fermentation. Aerobic stability. Aerobic Stability of Silages?

Optimized growth and preservation of energy crop

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Effect of Pork Belly and Broiler Chicken Meat on the Quality of Herb Sai Oua (Spicy Thai Herb Sausage)

Finnish feed evaluation system and Feed Tables

Prod t Diff erenti ti a on

Development of Value Added Products From Home-Grown Lychee

Using Leucaena to Improve the Quality of Pineapple Plant Silage

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Cool-Season Annual Forages for Hay in North Dakota

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Economic and Environmental Impacts Of Corn Silage Maturity Management

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences

QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF CHEESE PRODUCED FROM THREE BREEDS OF CATTLE IN NIGERIA

Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science. Development of Stir-fried Chilli Paste with Protein Supplementation from Khai Phum

2. Materials and methods. 1. Introduction. Abstract

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

IMPACT OF OVERSEEDING COOL-SEASON ANNUAL FORAGES ON SPRING REGROWTH OF TIFTON 85 BERMUDAGRASS 1. Abstract

Effects of molasses levels and growing conditions on nutritive value and fermentation quality of Opuntia cladodes silage

Fermentation Characteristics of Round-Bale Silages R.E. Muck USDA, Agricultural Research Service US Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706

Harvest and Storage of Silage. Ted Probert Regional Dairy Specialist

Effects of Biological and Chemical Additives on Fermentation Progress in Maize Silage

Materials and Methods

Factors Affecting the Quality Silage

Effect of benzoate, sorbate and citric acid on the storage stability of strawberry juice

Effects of Particle Length on Alfalfa Baled Silage Quality and Color under Different Storage Conditions

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Blood Serum Biochemical Parameters Broiler Chicks at 29 and 49 days of age

Effects of Different Packaging Materials on the Shelf Stability of Ginger Juice

Faba bean whole crop silage for dairy cows

Silage is a forage crop that is preserved in succulent condition by a process of fermentation (i.e. under anaerobic conditions).

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS ON FRUIT YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAWBERRIES CULTIVATED UNDER VAN ECOLOGICAL CONDITION ABSTRACT

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Performance Broiler Chicks

Preparation of Lassi from safflower milk blended with buffalo milk

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences

ABSTRACT. Keywords: buffalo s milk, cream cheese, malunggay, sensory quality INTRODUCTION

FIELD PEAS IN LIVESTOCK DIETS. Karla Jenkins Cow/calf range management specialist, Panhandle Research and Extension Center

VITAMIN B12 PRODUCTION BY Propionibacterium shermanil In Tempeh Warawut Krusong, Busaba Yongsmith* and Priscilla C. Sanchez**

Development and characterization of wheat breads with chestnut flour. Marta Gonzaga. Raquel Guiné Miguel Baptista Luísa Beirão-da-Costa Paula Correia

Inoculants Maintaining Quality Forages Until Feed Out

Using Pineapple to Produce Fish Sauce from Surimi Waste

Agriculture Update 12 TECHSEAR preparation of Kulfi with ginger extract. and T 3 OBJECTIVES

Leendert Dekker Snyman

Yield and Nutritive Quality of Nine Napier Grass Varieties in Malaysia

Genetic Variability in the Fodder Yield, Chemical Composition and Disappearance of Nutrients in Brown Midrib and White Midrib Sorghum Genotypes

Yield and nutritive value of four Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different harvesting ages

Baled Silage. Wayne Coblentz USDA-ARS US Dairy Forage Research Center Marshfield, WI

DETERMINATION OF FRYING TEMPERATURE AND VACUUM PRESSURE TO PRODUCE PINEAPPLE CHIPS USING SIMPLE VACUUM FRIER *)

Double Crop System. To Maximize Annual Forage Yield & Quality. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATED SEPARATOR BY-PRODUCT TO MOLASSES AS AN ANIMAL FEED SOURCE

Maurya Shalini 1, Dubey Prakash Ritu 2 Research Scholar 1, Associate Professor 2 Ethelind College of Home Science, SHUATS Allahabad, U.P.

Dr.Nibras Nazar. Microbial Biomass Production: Bakers yeast

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

UTILIZATION OF SUNFLOWER AND SESAME SEEDS IN TAHINA AND HALAWA PROCESSING. A Thesis. Presented to Graduate School

DEVELOPMENT OF MILK AND CEREAL BASED EXTRUDED PRODUCTS

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Process standardization of low-calories and low-sugar kalam

THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING SILAGE. Richard E. Muck 1 ABSTRACT

Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Some Hay Considerations

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L., THE QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER SEEDS CULTIVATED IN ALBANIA.

Quality INVESTIGATION of Rice Noodles Safe from Gluten

Guide for preparation of papers

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Quality characteristics of set yoghurt blended with Tender Coconut Water Milk - Carrageenan

AT HARVEST EFFECTS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF WINTER CEREALS FOR SILAGE

Bærme som proteinfoder til lakterende køer

Preferred by the Japanese over Imported Beef

NOVEL NON-DAIRY YOGHURT FROM PIGEON PEA MILK

Comparing Qualities of Grain Corn to Silage Corn

Bioethanol Production from Pineapple Peel Juice using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Acceptability and proximate composition of some sweet potato genotypes: Implication of breeding for food security and industrial quality

Development and Nutritional Evaluation of Value Added Baked Products using Strawberry (Fragaria)

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS ISSN: S. Latif 1, I. A. Qamar 1, M. F. Khan 2, A. Cheema 2, D. M. Bukhari 2, and A. W.

SCENARIO Propose a scenario (the hypothesis) for bacterial succession in each type of milk:

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL QUALITY APPRAISAL OF COMMERCIAL YOGHURT BRANDS SOLD AT LAHORE

AMARANTH PRODUCTIVITY AND NUTRIENT COMPOSITION IN CENTRAL GEORGIA

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. D.M. Xu 1,2, W.C. Ke 1,2, P. Zhang 1,2, F.H. Li 2,3 and X.S. Guo 1,2. Abstract


Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing

Effect of Setting Agent on Quality of Tubed-Package Sesame Tofu

Probiotic Production by Mixed Culture of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeast

Transcription:

KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). 29 Effect of effective microorganism (EM) and cassava starch on the physical quality and organic acid compositions of native grasses silage in central region of Lao PDR Pattaya Napasirth 1*, Viengsakoun Napasirth 2 and Yimin Cai 3 ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the physical quality and organic acid composition of grass silages prepared with and without effective microorganism (EM) and cassava starch at the time of ensiling. The native grasses in central region of Lao PDR were cut into pieces as long as pieces 2-3 cm and randomly allocated in a randomized complete block design with six treatments: T1= 10 ml EM + 0 g starch, T2= 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch, T3= 5 ml EM + 5 g starch, T4= 2.5 ml EM + 7.5 g starch, T5 = 0 ml EM + 10 g starch, T6 = silage without additive (control). Three of which were sampled on days 0 and 30 after ensiling. The color of silage was measured by the CIE L*a*b* system using Hunter Labmini scan EZ. The results showed that the silage treated with 10 g of starch had a lowest ph (ph = 3.82). Silage with 2.5 ml of EM with 7.5 g starch had higher greenness more than control. Organic acids and short chain fatty acids of silage such as succinic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid at 0 day of ensiling were not significantly different. However, the highest level of lactic acid at 30 days of ensiling was Hymenachne sp. grass silage treated with 5 ml EM + 5 g starch (T3). In conclusion, effective microorganism and starch used in this study improved color characteristics, reduced ph content of silage and increased lactic acid concentration of grass silage. Keywords: Effeective microorganism, cassava starch, grass silage Introduction Ensiling is a forage preservation method based on lactic acid bacteria converting watersoluble carbohydrates into lactic acid. Based on combination of acidity and anaerobic condition protects the forage from the proliferation of deleterious bacteria and fungi, and it also increases the palatability of the forage due to lactic acid production (Filya et al, 2000; Yang et al., 2006). Therefore, the instability of fermentation quality is mainly attributed to the ability of lactic acid bacteria and water soluble carbohydrate in substrate (Ohmomo et al., 2007). To obtain a high-quality fermented product, bacterial inoculants are added to silage in order to stimulate lactic acid fermentation, accelerating the decrease in ph, and thus improving silage preservation. Moreover, many additives have been used during silage fermentation to promote the growth of lactic acid bacteria populations as a way to increase the decomposition of lactic acids during ensiling. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the physical quality and organic acid composition of Lao-native grasses silage with the addition of effective microorganism (EM) and cassava starch. 1 Program in Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Technology, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Thailand 2 Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos, Lao PDR 3 National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan * Corresponding author: pattaya_napasirth@hotmail.com

30 KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). Materials and methods Silage Preparation The native grasses in central region of Lao PDR were cut into pieces as long as pieces 2-3 cm and dried up to obtain moisture content 60-70% and randomly allocated in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with six treatments: T1= 10 ml EM + 0 g starch, T2= 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch, T3= 5 ml EM + 5 g starch, T4= 2.5 ml EM + 7.5 g starch, T5 = 0 ml EM + 10 g starch, T6 = silage without additive (control). These materials were prepared by using a small-scale system of silage fermentation (Cai et al. 1999). Silages were preserved into plastic film bags and ensilaged at room temperature (25-32 o C) for 0 and 30 days. Chemical and Statistical Analysis Dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) were analyzed according to AOAC (1990). The acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were analyzed by the methods of Van Soest et al. (1991). Fermentation products of the silages were determined from cold water extracts. Wet silage (10 g) was homogenized with 90 ml of sterilized distilled water (Cai et al., 1999). The ph was measured with a glass electrode ph meter (MP230; Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). The organic acid contents were measured by HPLC methods as described by Cai et al. (1999). Data on the chemical composition of the 15 and 30 d silages were analyzed by general linear model, and the significance of differences among means was tested by duncan s new multiple range test (Steel and Torrie, 1980). Results and Discussions Chemical composition and color characteristics The effect of applying effective microorganism and cassava starch at ensiling on the fermentation of Lao-native grass silage was studied under laboratory conditions. The chemical composition and color characteristics of the Hymenachne sp. and Echinochloa sp. silage are presented in Table 1. The results showed that the dry matter of silage ranges from 20.44-27.13% after 30 days of ensiling. The treatment also improved the nutritive values of the Hymenachne sp. silages by decreasing the levels of NDF contents. Moreover, Hymenachne sp. treated with 7.5 ml EM and 2.5 g starch had a lower NDF content than control. Color characteristics ranged from 27.98-37.22 for L*, 4.66-6.11 for a* and 26.12-43.88 for b*. The Hymenachne sp. silage treated with 2.5 ml EM with 7.5 g of cassava starch had higher greenness more than control. Fermentation of the Control treatments in both forages showed a darkness with detection of L* in silages. Silage ph and organic acid composition Changes in ph and organic acids of grass silages without or with EM and cassava starch are shown in Table 2. The ph values of all silages decreased sharply after 30 days of fermentation. All ph values were within the range of 3.82 to 4.75 (Table 2), which reflects adequate fermentation for restricting the growth of undesirable microorganisms like Clostridia (Tang et al., 1989).

KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). Adding effective microorganism and cassava starch to fresh Lao-native grass at the time of ensiling has resulted in increased lactic acid production variation ranging from 0.75 to 7.85% (Table 2). The significantly highest value was recorded in the Echinochloa sp. with 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch while lowest in silage without additive (control). Moreover, the results showed that Hymenachne sp. silage was effective in elevating butyric acid than Echinochloa sp. silage. In addition, the minimum butyric acid recorded was around 1.42 for Echinochloa sp. silage with 10 g starch. However, inoculating the native grass non- significant decreased the butyric acid content of the silage (P>0.05). The results which 31 are in agreement with previous research in other researchers had found that microbial inoculants did not affect acetic or butyric acid contents of silage (McAllister et al., 1995; Moshtaghi Nia and Wittenberg, 1999). On the other hand, the overall fermentation quality of the two forages the Echinochloa sp. silage treated 10 g starch revealed a better fermentation because silage ph is lower than 4.0 and without traces of acetic acid and butyric acids in silage compared to Hymenachne sp. silage. This indicates good quality silage and within the suggested range of 4.0-4.2, as has been reported by several studies (Ryser et al., 1997; Kuoppala et al., 2007)

32 KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). Table 1 Effect of EM and cassava starch on the color characteristics (L*, a* and b*) of silage Hymenachne sp. Echinochloa sp. P-value T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 SEM Grass Trt (T) G*T (G) Chemical composition, % of dry matter basis Dry matter 0 23.37 26.29 27.30 28.26 28.17 24.29 23.93 23.42 24.85 27.03 28.68 26.12 0.29 *** *** *** 30 20.44 22.62 25.09 26.83 24.58 21.94 22.49 23.64 25.34 25.44 27.13 24.06 0.43 *** *** *** Organic matter 0 97.93 98.01 98.06 98.15 98.09 97.89 98.47 98.54 98.62 98.47 98.66 98.28 0.05 *** *** *** 30 97.97 98.08 98.08 97.99 98.09 97.85 98.40 98.33 98.41 98.50 98.66 98.25 0.04 *** *** NS Neutral detergent fiber 0 74.78 74.10 69.77 64.24 61.56 73.99 58.32 60.34 59.08 55.26 58.87 55.48 1.49 *** *** *** 30 59.03 57.68 68.93 57.11 66.28 76.45 76.69 73.61 72.84 67.96 63.34 71.86 1.42 *** *** *** acid detergent fiber 0 40.86 39.00 37.37 34.91 32.10 41.34 41.90 42.24 37.69 35.10 33.02 41.72 0.73 *** *** * 30 40.17 43.14 39.78 33.74 32.69 42.65 47.65 43.09 42.96 37.84 35.51 46.17 0.95 *** *** *** acid detergent lignin 0 10.81 10.57 8.93 6.16 6.04 7.76 7.59 7.59 6.21 6.44 5.76 7.55 0.35 *** *** *** 30 8.57 8.32 7.32 7.05 6.24 7.48 7.95 8.24 7.22 6.90 5.69 8.14 0.18 NS *** *** Color characteristics L* 0 26.39 32.25 32.62 32.17 34.44 27.69 22.60 26.59 30.77 29.38 33.45 23.95 0.87 *** *** NS 30 31.15 32.72 30.93 35.21 33.09 27.98 29.68 30.60 34.13 31.22 37.22 28.59 0.87 NS *** *** a* 0-0.55-0.58 0.01-0.48-0.49-0.88-0.64-3.30-3.25-4.09-4.26-2.71 0.32 *** *** *** 30 5.14 5.32 5.52 4.66 4.78 6.11 5.65 5.12 4.78 5.06 4.75 5.08 0.23 NS ** ** b* 0 32.95 29.27 27.97 26.73 24.36 35.12 36.68 40.11 37.21 35.22 34.42 34.50 1.09 *** *** *** 30 40.27 38.51 38.00 29.48 26.12 31.30 43.88 40.95 39.89 36.37 36.61 39.37 1.21 *** *** *** * = P<0.05, ** = P<0.01, *** = P<0.001, NS = Non significant T1= 10 ml EM + 0 g starch, T2= 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch, T3= 5 ml EM + 5 g starch, T4= 2.5 ml EM + 7.5 g starch, T5 = 0 ml EM + 10 g starch, T6 = silage without additive (control) L* represents lightness from black (0) to white (100); a* (+ redness to - greenness); b* (+ yellowness to - blueness)

KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). 33 Table 2 Effect of EM and cassava starch on the ph and organic acid compositions (% of Fresh matter) of silage Hymenachne sp. Echinochloa sp. P-value T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 SEM Grass Trt (T) G*T (G) Chemical composition, % of dry matter basis ph 0 5.66 5.59 5.80 5.73 5.67 5.83 4.66 4.77 4.60 4.54 4.43 4.32 0.16 *** NS NS 30 4.65 4.30 4.15 4.21 4.37 4.93 4.58 4.01 4.28 4.20 3.82 4.75 0.03 *** *** *** Acetic acid 0 5.42 6.27 5.87 6.32 4.32 5.78 8.40 6.60 5.22 5.72 5.42 7.96 0.33 NS NS NS 30 9.10 6.72 6.91 6.28 7.92 10.16 5.72 5.11 6.04 5.11 2.20 7.79 0.46 *** NS NS Propionic acid 0 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.02 NS NS NS 30 1.29 0.80 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.40 0.37 0.30 0.76 0.37 0.13 0.35 0.06 * *** *** Butyric acid 0 0.61 0.94 0.55 0.64 0.87 0.96 0.66 0.75 0.33 0.69 0.68 0.67 0.07 NS NS NS 30 4.38 4.72 3.66 2.64 3.50 1.72 2.40 2.36 2.85 2.41 1.42 2.43 0.22 *** NS NS Lactic acid 0 2.56 1.52 2.45 2.43 3.18 1.17 0.37 0.88 1.00 1.01 0.77 1.18 0.17 *** * NS 30 1.67 3.36 5.54 3.75 2.50 1.42 1.01 7.85 1.92 2.61 7.71 0.75 0.43 NS *** *** Formic acid 0 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.01 NS NS NS 30 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.13 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.01 NS NS * Succinic acid 0 0.25 0.36 0.39 0.40 0.43 0.60 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.24 0.34 0.46 0.03 NS NS NS 30 0.98 1.61 2.31 1.98 0.64 1.13 0.67 0.77 1.93 1.53 0.41 0.62 0.13 * *** NS * = P<0.05, ** = P<0.01, *** = P<0.001, NS = Non significant T1= 10 ml EM + 0 g starch, T2= 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch, T3= 5 ml EM + 5 g starch, T4= 2.5 ml EM + 7.5 g starch, T5 = 0 ml EM + 10 g starch, T6 = silage without additive (control)

34 KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42 SUPPL. 4 : (2014). Conclusions Adding effective microorganism and cassava starch to fresh Lao-native grass at the time of ensiling has resulted in decreased NDF content and ph value. As expected, all treatments resulted in silage with a lower ph compared with the untreated silage. In addition, Echinochloa sp. silage treated with 10 g starch had the lowest ph (3.82). Inoculating the native grass increased the lactic acid content of the silage. The significantly highest value was recorded in the Echinochloa sp. with 7.5 ml EM + 2.5 g starch while lowest in silage without additive (control). In addition, the minimum butyric acid recorded was around 1.42 for Echinochloa sp. silage with 10 g starch. The overall fermentation quality of the two forages the Echinochloa sp. silage treated 10 g starch revealed a better fermentation because silage ph is lower than 4.0 and without traces of acetic acid and butyric acids in silage compared to Hymenachne sp. silage. Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their most sincere thanks to Udon Thani Rajabhat University, University of Laos and National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan for financial support and special laboratory facilities. References AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15 th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. Cai, Y., S. Kumai, M. Ogawa, Y. Benno, and T. Nakase. 1999. Characterization and identification of Pediococcus species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2901-2906. Filya, I., G. Ashbell, Y. Hen, and Z. Weinberg. 2000. The effect of bacterial inoculants on the fermentation and aerobic stability of whole crop wheat silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 88: 39-46. Kuoppala, K., M. Rinne, J. Nousiainen, and P. Huhtanen. 2008. The effect of cutting time of grass silage in primary growth and regrowth and the interactions between silage quality and concentrate level on milk production of dairy cows. Livest. Sci. 116: 171 182. McAllister, T.A., L.B. Selinger, L.R. McMahon, H.D. Bae, T.J. Lysyk, S.J. Oosting, and K.-J. Cheng. 1995. Intake, digestibility and aerobic stability of barley silage inoculated with mixtures of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 425 432. Moshtaghi Nia, S.A., and K.M. Wittenberg. 1999. Use of forage inoculants with or without enzymes to improve preservation and quality of whole crop barley forage ensiled as large bales. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 525 532. Ohmomo S., S. Nitisinprasert, D. Kraykaw, P. Pholsen, S. Tanomwongwattana, O. Tanaka, T. Suzuki, and T. Nishida. 2007. Attempt to Practical Use of Lactobacillus plantarum SP 1-3 in Spray Dried Granule Form for Making Good Quality Silage in Thailand. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.). 41: 34 42. Ryser E.T., S.M. Arimi, and C.W. Donnelly. 1997. Effects of ph on Distribution of Listeria Ribotypes in Corn,Hay, and Grass Silage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 3695-3697. Steel R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometerial Approach. 2 nd Edition. Mc Graw-Hill, New York. Tang I.-C., M.R. Okos, and S.-T. Yang. 1989. Effects of ph and acetic acid on homoacetic fermentation of lactate by Clostridium formicoaceticum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34: 1063 1074. Van Soest P.J., J.B. Robertson, and B.A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597. Yang H.Y., X.F. Wang, J.B. Liu, L.J. Gao, M. Ishii, Y. Igarashi, and Z.J. Cui. 2006. Effect of water-soluble carbohydrate content on silage fermentation of wheat straw. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101: 232-237.