Long-term responses in soil solution and stream-water chemistry at Hubbard Brook after experimental addition of wollastonite

Similar documents
MODEL ROOF PROGRAM BIOCHAR RESEARCH

TOWN OF EMMITSBURG 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

2009 National Cool-Season Traffic Trial. Seed Companies and Breeders. Kevin N. Morris, Executive Director. DATE: July 6, 2009

wine 1 wine 2 wine 3 person person person person person

Citrus Fruit Antimicrobial Effects. By John Seabrooke Central Catholic High School Grade 9

Reputation Tapping: Examining Consumer Response to Wine Appellation Information

Atis (Annona Squamosa) Tea

Effect of Charcoal Application to Early Growth Stage of Acaia mangium

COMMON OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.) HUSK CONTENT DEPENDING ON GENOTYPE AND GRAIN SIZE

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Elemental Analysis of Yixing Tea Pots by Laser Excited Atomic. Fluorescence of Desorbed Plumes (PLEAF) Bruno Y. Cai * and N.H. Cheung Dec.

Recalibration for Sunflower

Laboratory Research Proposal Streusel Coffee Cake with Pureed Cannellini Beans

Economic and environmental feasibility study of water hyacinth briquette in Cirata Reservoir

COMPARISON OF EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS OF URBANIZATION IN DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS OF HYDERABAD KARNATAKA REGION A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

SEMINOLE COUNTY AUDIT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FEE RATE STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2008

Vineyard Site Selection and Layout. Dean Volenberg UW-Extension Door County

November 13, Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW Dear Administrator McCarthy:

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

Guide to the Wayne State University Architectural Drawings Collection WSR Table of Contents

FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY (DFC) NOVEMBER EXAMINATION

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Feeding habits of range-shifting herbivores: tropical surgeonfishes in a temperate environment

Experimental characterization of short channel bulk MOSFET devices with different gate LER

YOUR GUIDE TO MANAGING FOOD ALLERGIES & CELIAC DISEASE

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 236 CHEMICALS FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCES (March 2001)

Engineering Sustainability

Development of an efficient machine planting system for progeny testing Ongoing progeny testing of black walnut, black cherry, northern red oak,

Research & Reviews: Journal of Food and Dairy Technology

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Suitability for Haul Roads (MI) Macomb County, Michigan, and Oakland County, Michigan (River Bends Park, West Side, Shelby Twp.)

Internet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors

GENETICALLY MODIFIED SOYBEANS VERSUS TRADITIONAL SOYBEANS HOW DO THEY COMPARE?

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CAFFEINE PROFILE OF MATURE TEA LEAVES AND PROCESSED TEA MARKETED IN SONITPUR DISTRICT OF ASSAM, INDIA.

EXPERIMENT 3 - IDENTIFYING FEATURES OF MUTANT SEEDS USING NOMARSKI MICROSCOPY (GENE ONE)

Average Environmental Product Declaration of HAproWINE wineries

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts LEVERAGING AGITATING RETORT PROCESSING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCT QUALITY

Which of your fingernails comes closest to 1 cm in width? What is the length between your thumb tip and extended index finger tip? If no, why not?

Macroclimate in New York and Site Suitability

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

Running head: THE OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE OF C. MACULATUS 1. The Oviposition Preference of Callosobruchus maculatus and Its Hatch Rates on Mung,

Biologist at Work! Experiment: Width across knuckles of: left hand. cm... right hand. cm. Analysis: Decision: /13 cm. Name

GLOSSARY Last Updated: 10/17/ KL. Terms and Definitions

El Campo de Futbol. Las Capucas, Honduras

Amy Porter FN / 20/ 06 Written Report

Aluminum Foil as Single-Use Substrate for MALDI- MS Fingerprinting of Different Melanoma Cell Lines

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Francis MACARY UR ETBX, Irstea The 31st of March to the 2nd of April,

Preventing Imbibition Damage before the Germination of Soybean Seeds (Part,)*

breakfast menu served until 11am

Full Taste Zero Alcohol

Climatic shifts in high quality wine production areas, Emilia Romagna, Italy,

Packaging that is 100% Environmental and Sustainable

N e w Yo r k C i t y / N YS T L C ata lo g for FAMIS purchases

Help in Addressing the Challenges to Entering the Vineyard and Winery Industry

Tree diversity effect on dominant height in temperate forest

Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool (NEAT)

Vegan Ice Cream with Similar Nutritional Value to Dairy-based Ice Cream

Unit code: A/601/1687 QCF level: 5 Credit value: 15

CONCENTRATION OF AROMA AND VITAMIN RICH FRUIT JUICES BY COMPLEX MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY

Madera Vintners Association Grant Program In Honor Of Dr. Vincent Petrucci and Professor Ken Fugelsang

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

National 5 ADDITIONAL QUESTION BANK You have chosen to study: Statistics. Please choose a question to attempt from the following: Back to Unit 2 Menu

Rheological and physicochemical studies on emulsions formulated with chitosan previously dispersed in aqueous solutions of lactic acid

Local Development Framework Background Paper Assessment of Retail Hierarchy. August 2009

Portable Convenient Red/ Orange Vegetable Options for K12

The multivariate piecewise linear growth model for ZHeight and zbmi can be expressed as:

Freshwater Use by U.S. Power Plants: Electricity s Thirst for a Precious Resource. Appendix B: Graphics

bag handling Poor technology High Technology Bulk handling mechanized

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

! " # # $% 004/2009. SpeedExtractor E-916

Science Project for ICCE General Level

Devin Bates, Rossy Bueno & Tasha Perkins 11/18/2013

Regional and harvest date relationships with storage quality of Honeycrisp apples

Plant Propagation Protocol for Prunus subcordata ESRM 412 Native Plant Production

Evaluating Hazelnut Cultivars for Yield, Quality and Disease Resistance

Coffee Machine Market Size, Share, Growth, Trend & Research Report 2015: Radiant Insights, Inc

How Product Category Shapes Preferences toward Global and Local Brands: A Schema Theory Perspective. Vasileios Davvetas and Adamantios Diamantopoulos

For Winery Owner Joel Gott The Best Terroir Is Not Always Under Foot

Step 1: Prepare To Use the System

An autoregulated fine-tuning strategy for titer improvement of secondary

The Great Chile Book By John Harrisson, Mark Miller READ ONLINE

ANALYSIS OF CLIMATIC FACTORS IN CONNECTION WITH STRAWBERRY GENERATIVE BUD DEVELOPMENT

Better Punctuation Prediction with Hierarchical Phrase-Based Translation

Determination of Metals in Wort and Beer Samples using the Agilent 5110 ICP-OES

Guide to SF State Campus Vendors

A basic investigation on instant coffee production by vacuum belt drying

Effect of Different Levels of Grape Pomace on Blood Serum Biochemical Parameters Broiler Chicks at 29 and 49 days of age

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council Annual Report 2012

RESEARCH ABOUT EXPLORING OF NEW WHEAT AND RYE GERMPLASM FROM TRANSYLVANIA TO BREEDING FOR PRODUCTIVITY, IN BRAILA PLAIN CONDITIONS

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Effects of Drying and Tempering Rice Using a Continuous Drying Procedure 1

Roya Survey Developers Bil Doyle Brad Johns Greg Johnson Robin McNal y Kirsti Wal Graduate Consultant Mohammad Sajib Al Seraj Avinash Subramanian

Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Tax Credit

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Statistics: Final Project Report Chipotle Water Cup: Water or Soda?

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

Transcription:

, 13, 528 540 Supplementary material Long-term responses in soil solution and stream-water chemistry at Hubbard Brook after experimental addition of wollastonite Shuai Shao, A Charles T. Driscoll, A,E Chris E. Johnson, A Timothy J. Fahey, B John J. Battles C and Joel D. Blum D A Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. B Department of Natural Resources, G16 Fernow Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. C Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 137 Mulford Hall #3114, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. D Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 1100 North University Avenue, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. E Corresponding author. Email: ctdrisco@syr.edu Page 1 of 8

Table S1. Ca, Si, Ca : Si, Al i and Ca : Al i in Oa, Bh and Bs horizons soil solutions, before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.01 for all tests Parameter Horizons X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca (μmol L 1 ) Oa 19.6 ± 14.8 38.9 ± 32.6 39.8 ± 29.2 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Bh 17.3 ± 7.7 28.6 ± 20.4 23.3 ± 16.7 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0046 Bs Si (μmol L 1 ) Oa 14.1 ± 7.2 73.2 ± 38.8 20.8 ± 11.8 207.4 ± 131.5 22.9 ± 19.1 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0002 97.9 ± 44.2 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Bh 82.6 ± 37.2 121.8 107.7 ± 43.6 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Ca : Si Bs 62.3 ± 28.9 135.9 ± 98.4 83.4 ± 20.2 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Oa 0.32 ± 0.31 0.18 ± 0.12 0.41 ± 0.27 1999 > 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.0164 Bh 0.24 ± 0.18 0.18 ± 0.18 0.21 ± 0.10 1999 > 2000, P = 0.0094 1999 2011, P = 0.8721 Bs 0.27 ± 0.24 0.14 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.26 1999 > 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.3324 Al i (μmol L 1 ) Oa 10.2 ± 8.3 6.5 ± 7.0 3.2 ± 2.7 1999 > 2000, P = 0.001 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 Bh 10.6 ± 11.5 7.0 ± 6.0 5.2 ± 3.3 1999 2000, P = 0.057 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 Bs 10.2 ± 8.3 9.0 ± 6.9 5.5 ± 3.7 1999 2000, P = 0.1916 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 Ca : Al i Oa 3.9 ± 9.7 9.5 ± 13.8 24.5 ± 49.8 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0046 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0011 Bh 3.2 ± 3.2 7.7 ± 9.4 5.1 ± 4.4 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0018 Bs 3.0 ± 3.5 3.7 ± 5.3 25.9 ± 90.2 1999 2000, P = 0.1948 1999 2011, P = 0.0217 Page 2 of 8

Table S2. Ca and Si concentrations in Oa, Bh and Bs horizon soil solutions, before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to three sub-watersheds of watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) hardwood zone (LH). X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.001 for all tests Parameter Sub-watershed Horizon X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca (μmol L 1 ) SFB Oa 14.8 ± 12.5 44.7 ± 27.4 46.1 ± 26.4 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 9.5 ± 5.6 25.7 ± 20.1 25.3 ± 15.8 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 10.1 ± 6.2 13.9 ± 11.4 29.3 ± 20.2 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 HH Oa 36.1 ± 25.2 45.7 ± 21.7 57.8 ± 26.7 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 22.9 ± 9.1 37.7 ± 6.7 28.2 ± 17.2 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 18.2 ± 2.7 22.1 ± 7.8 16.9 ± 7.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.4646 LH Oa 34.3 ± 15.6 63.5 ± 48.5 28.1 ± 10.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.7751 Bh 21.9 ± 7.2 26.8 ± 8.6 19.1 ± 1.5 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.5938 Bs 19.8 ± 3.5 27.8 ± 11.1 11.2 ± 3.6 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.9332 Si (μmol L 1 ) SFB Oa 65.4 ± 22.3 227.6 ± 55.8 84.4 ± 16.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 74.7 ± 30.4 190.9 ± 60.9 84.6 ± 21.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.0261 Bs 55.4 ± 22.6 141.5 ± 99.8 67.8 ± 23.4 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 HH Oa 87.8 ± 19.2 233.4 ± 101.6 103.8 ± 32.6 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 76.4 ± 28.3 195.5 ± 88.3 97.5 ± 37.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 59.2 ± 17.1 123.5 ± 42.4 81.7 ± 13.5 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 LH Oa 72.6 ± 11.5 299.2 ± 132.4 93.2 ± 23.8 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 79.5 ± 11.2 114.4 ± 20.9 105.5 ± 33.2 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 73.5 ± 25.4 99.2 ± 23.7 88.1 ± 8.4 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Page 3 of 8

Table S3. Ca : Si and Al i concentrations in Oa, Bh and Bs horizon soil solutions, before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to three sub-watersheds of watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) hardwood zone (LH). X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.001 for all tests Parameter Sub-watershed Horizon X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca : Si SFB Oa 0.18 ± 0.12 0.20 ± 0.12 0.59 ± 0.27 1999 2000 P = 0.0823 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 0.14 ± 0.18 0.13 ± 0.11 0.30 ± 0.10 1999 2000 P = 0.6187 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 0.21 ± 0.24 0.10 ± 0.09 0.43 ± 0.26 1999 2000 P = 0.3658 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 HH Oa 0.45 ± 0.21 0.20 ± 0.12 0.56 ± 0.27 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.4859 Bh 0.31 ± 0.11 0.19 ± 0.08 0.29 ± 0.17 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.8381 Bs 0.31 ± 0.17 0.16 ± 0.07 0.21 ± 0.21 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 LH Oa 0.46 ± 0.32 0.21 ± 0.15 0.35 ± 0.22 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 0.28 ± 0.17 0.23 ± 0.14 0.11 ± 0.05 1999 2000 P = 0.0213 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 0.27 ± 0.09 0.28 ± 0.15 0.13 ± 0.05 1999 2000 P = 0.9215 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Al i (μmol L 1 ) SFB Oa 11.8 ± 8.2 7.8 ± 5.4 2.2 ± 1.8 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 17.2 ± 11.9 11.1 ± 5.8 4.8 ± 1.4 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 15.4 ± 9.8 14.2 ± 3.7 7.5 ± 4.7 1999 2000 P = 0.1056 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 HH Oa 9.5 ± 0.9 5.1 ± 1.3 0.5 ± 0.3 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 12.1 ± 5.8 6.4 ± 0.4 7.8 ± 3.3 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 14.7 ± 8.9 12.9 ± 3.2 9.5 ± 3.7 1999 2000 P = 0.0618 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 LH Oa 6.3 ± 3.2 3.3 ± 2.2 2.0 ± 1.8 1999 > 2000 P = 0.0019 1999 > 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 6.1 ± 3.2 4.6 ± 1.8 5.8 ± 2.4 1999 2000 P = 0.0858 1999 2011 P = 0.9721 Bs 7.5 ± 2.9 5.7 ± 2.8 5.8 ± 0.7 1999 > 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.0161 Page 4 of 8

Table S4. Ca : Al i in Oa, Bh and Bs soil solutions, before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to three subwatersheds of watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) hardwood zone (LH). X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.001 for all tests Parameter Sub-watershed Horizon X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca : Al i SFB Oa 1.2 ± 2.3 5.7 ± 8.2 20.6 ± 24.8 1999 < 2000 P = 0.0003 1999 < 2011 P = 0.0001 Bh 0.7 ± 2.7 2.3 ± 2.5 5.3 ± 4.1 1999 < 2000 P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bs 0.6 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 1.5 1999 2000 P = 0.0012 1999 2011 P = 0.0186 HH Oa 4.2 ± 2.9 9.2 ± 7.8 108.4 ± 130.8 1999 2000 P = 0.0058 1999 2011 P = 0.0018 Bh 1.9 ± 2.6 5.9 ± 4.9 3.6 ± 2.7 1999 < 2000 P = 0.0001 1999 2011 P = 0.0215 Bs 2.1 ± 3.8 1.7 ± 4.4 1.8 ± 0.7 1999 2000 P = 0.1515 1999 2000 P = 0.2759 LH Oa 5.5 ± 2.9 19.5 ± 12.2 16.7 ± 7.3 1999 < 2000 P = 0.0001 1999 < 2011 P < 0.0001 Bh 3.8 ± 3.1 6.5 ± 9.6 2.1 ± 0.9 1999 2000 P = 0.0412 1999 2011 P = 0.3318 Bs 3.4 ± 2.7 4.8 ± 3.9 1.9 ± 1.2 1999 2000 P = 0.0918 1999 2011 P = 0.2376 Page 5 of 8

Table S5. Ca, Si, Ca : Si, ANC, and Al i concentrations in stream water before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.05 for all tests Parameter X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca (μmol L 1 ) 18.4 ± 5.1 48.1 ± 13.9 22.1 ± 7.2 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0035 Si (μmol L 1 ) 65.1+ ± 9.2 125.8 ± 38.7 76.6 ± 12.2 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Ca : Si 0.27 ± 0.06 0.39 ± 0.13 0.26 ± 0.06 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.6892 ANC (μeq L 1 ) 6.2 ± 18.1 3.0 ± 11.5 4.14 ± 23.4 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0005 1999 2011, P = 0.3161 Al i (μmol L 1 ) 10.3 ± 3.9 4.4 ± 3.1 3.02 ± 1.9 1999 > 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 Page 6 of 8

Table S6. Ca, Si, Ca : Si, ANC, and Al i concentrations in stream water before (1999) and after (2000 and 2011) wollastonite application to three sub-watersheds of watershed 1 (W1) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) hardwood zone (LH). X = arithmetic mean, s.d. = standard deviation. Both alternative hypotheses (year > or < year) and null hypotheses (year year) were tested by two sample t-test based on P value, using the significance level of 0.01 for all tests Parameter Subwatershed X ± s.d. Significant differences Ca (μmol L 1 ) SFB 10.7 ± 1.4 40.6 ± 8.1 21.7 ± 2.8 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 HH 20.3 ± 3.4 43.9 ± 11.2 18.9 ± 2.3 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.7894 LH 20.9 ± 3.7 53.9 ± 2.1 19.1 ± 2.1 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.9541 Si (μmol L 1 ) SFB 54.7 ± 11.3 188.0 ± 66.0 65.7 ± 11.6 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0026 1999 < 2011, P = 0.0184 HH 58.5 ± 5.2 109.7 ± 21.9 73.6 ± 7.0 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 Ca : Si LH 68.5 ± 4.7 122.6 ± 20.7 82.7 ± 9.7 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 SFB 0.17 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.07 1999 2000, P = 0.023 1999 < 2011, P < 0.0001 HH 0.29 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.12 0.26 ± 0.05 1999 < 2000,P = 0.0006 1999 2011, P = 0.9397 LH 0.29 ± 0.06 0.44 ± 0.11 0.23 ± 0.05 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.9997 ANC (μeq L 1 ) SFB 34.0 ± 23.1 12.38 ± 2.6 10.9 ± 43.3 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0085 1999 2011, P = 0.0084 HH 11.1 ± 9.4 1.6 ± 5.8 11.9 ± 13.3 1999 < 2000, P = 0.0007 1999 2011, P = 0.5826 LH 6.3 ± 9.4 10.9 ± 10.8 5.1 ± 16.4 1999 < 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 2011, P = 0.3859 Al i (μmol L 1 ) SFB 13.1 ± 2.3 5.9 ± 2.2 3.2 ± 0.7 1999 > 2000, P = 0.0037 1999 > 2011, P = 0.0002 HH 13.9 ± 2.9 5.9 ± 3.1 4.3 ± 2.2 1999 > 2000, P = 0.0005 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 LH 8.7 ± 1.8 1.0 ± 1.3 1.9 ± 1.0 1999 > 2000, P < 0.0001 1999 > 2011, P < 0.0001 Page 7 of 8

Table S7. The responses of Ca, Si and Ali concentrations in Oa, Bh and Bs horizons soil solutions, and stream water among three subwatersheds to the wollastonite addition to watershed 1 of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) hardwood zone (LH). We define the treatment effect as = 2011 1999. The null hypotheses (SFB HH LH) and alternative hypotheses (at least two are different) were tested using one-way ANOVA. If we rejected the null hypotheses for one-way ANOVA, then we performed a pairwise mean comparison to identify which response differs from which response. The significance level of 0.05 was used for all tests Parameter Horizon = 2011 1999 Sub-watersheds SFB HH LH differences Ca (μmol L 1 ) Oa 25.2 21.8 6.6 SFB HH > LH Bh 10.3 8.9 11.7 SFB HH LH Bs 16.1 0.5 7.5 SFB > LH > HH Stream 11.3 1.7 2.3 SFB > HH LH Si (μmol L 1 ) Oa 18.6 16.7 20.6 SFB HH LH Bh 17.9 20.6 25.5 SFB HH LH Bs 16.4 20.1 16.6 SFB HH LH Stream 4.5 6.3 7.4 SFB HH LH Ali (μmol L 1 ) Oa 9.6 9.0 4.8 SFB HH > LH Bh 7.7 4.9 0.3 SFB HH > LH Bs 7.5 4.8 1.5 SFB HH > LH Stream 6.4 6.8 4.3 SFB HH LH Page 8 of 8