ASSESSMENT OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND SEED QUALITY TRAITS IN BRASSICA CARINATA LANDRACE GENOTYPES, DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES AND HYBRIDS

Similar documents
Dune - the first canola quality Brassica juncea (Juncea canola) cultivar and future Juncea canola research priorities for Australia

Chapter V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Brassica (canola) oilseed breeding in Canada

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

(Definition modified from APSnet)

Response of Three Brassica Species to High Temperature Stress During Reproductive Growth

Brassica carinata and Camelina sativa Eric Johnson1, Kevin Falk1 and Christina Eynck2 1AAFC; 2Linnaeus Plant Sciences Inc.

SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO THE FINNISH GROWING CONDITIONS

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTORATE OF RAPESEED-MUSTARD RESEARCH, BHARATPUR, INDIA

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L., THE QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER SEEDS CULTIVATED IN ALBANIA.

Confectionary sunflower A new breeding program. Sun Yue (Jenny)

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

PROBATION AND FOUNDATION PLOT PRODUCTION OF CANOLA, MUSTARD, RADISH, RAPESEED, SAFFLOWER, AND SUNFLOWER

CERTIFIED PRODUCTION OF CANOLA, MUSTARD, RADISH, AND RAPESEED

Evaluate Characteristics of new cherry tomato varieties of Mahasarakham University

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Hybrid Seeds Production

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Genotype influence on sensory quality of roast sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Where in the Genome is the Flax b1 Locus?

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE-RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL WALNUT VARIETIES IN THE CENTRAL COAST

D Lemmer and FJ Kruger

AVOCADO GENETICS AND BREEDING PRESENT AND FUTURE

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

DIVERSIFICATION OF SUNFLOWER GERMPLASM FOR DIFFERENT ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Temperature Regimes for Avocados Grown In Kwazulu-Natal

YIELD PERFORMANCE OF STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES. Abstract

THE EFFECT OF GIRDLING ON FRUIT QUALITY, PHENOLOGY AND MINERAL ANALYSIS OF THE AVOCADO TREE

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Materials and Methods

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Comparison of the Improved Coconut Hybrid CRIC65 with its Reciprocal Cross and the Parental Varieties for Reproductive Traits

Overcoming challenges to developing varieties resistant to Sclerotinia - managing pathogen variation. Photos: Caixia Li

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS ON FRUIT YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAWBERRIES CULTIVATED UNDER VAN ECOLOGICAL CONDITION ABSTRACT

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and Morphological Traits in Crosses Among Elite Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Lines

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

UTILIZATION OF SUNFLOWER AND SESAME SEEDS IN TAHINA AND HALAWA PROCESSING. A Thesis. Presented to Graduate School

Relationship between Mineral Nutrition and Postharvest Fruit Disorders of 'Fuerte' Avocados

2. Materials and methods. 1. Introduction. Abstract

CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY

YIELD POTENTIAL OF NOVEL SEMI-DWARF GRAIN AMARANTHS TESTED FOR TENNESSEE GROWING CONDITIONS

What Went Wrong with Export Avocado Physiology during the 1996 Season?

Determination of Fruit Sampling Location for Quality Measurements in Melon (Cucumis melo L.)

Combining ability (SCA & GCA) and heterotic response analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss)

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2013

Bangladesh. : Associate Professor and Leader of the Canola program, University of

Organic Seed Partnership

Evaluation of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) hybrids for vegetative parameters and nut yield

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

Winter Oilseed Rape. Irish Recommended List for 2016 Sowing. CROPS EVALUATION and CERTIFICATION DIVISION

Discrimination of Ruiru 11 Hybrid Sibs based on Raw Coffee Quality

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Optimizing the production of Brassica juncea canola, in comparison with other Brassica species, in different soil-climatic zones

ESTIMATION OF COMBINING ABILITIES FOR EARLY MATURITY, YIELD AND OIL RELATED TRAITS IN SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)

BATURIN S.O., KUZNETSOVA

Key words: fruit breeding, cultivar description, pollenizer, tetraploidy, few-seeded fruit

INFLUENCE OF THIN JUICE ph MANAGEMENT ON THICK JUICE COLOR IN A FACTORY UTILIZING WEAK CATION THIN JUICE SOFTENING

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

1. Evaluated published leaf, petiole and stem as inoculation sites

School of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, P O Box 219, Haramaya, Ethiopia.

ANNEX XI TO THE DECISION OECD SCHEME FOR THE VARIETAL CERTIFICATION OF MAIZE SEED

Effect of Breed on Palatability of Dry-Cured Ham. S.J. Wells, S.J. Moeller, H.N. Zerby, K.M. Irvin

RUST RESISTANCE IN WILD HELIANTHUS ANNUUS AND VARIATION BY GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN

Calvin Lietzow and James Nienhuis Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

FRUIT GROWTH IN THE ORIENTAL PERSIMMON

(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY

LOWER HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AVOCADO CULTIVARS LAMB HASS AND GEM MATURITY AND FRUIT QUALITY RESULTS FROM NEW ZEALAND EVALUATION TRIALS

NEW ZEALAND AVOCADO FRUIT QUALITY: THE IMPACT OF STORAGE TEMPERATURE AND MATURITY

Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Preliminary observation on a spontaneous tricotyledonous mutant in sunflower

Analysis of Bunch Quality in Oil Palm Hybrid Cross Combinations under Krishna-Godavari Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Two New Verticillium Threats to Sunflower in North America

Selection Advantages in Faba Bean (Vicia Faba L.) For Early Maturity and High Productivity

Haskap: The shape of things to come? by Dr. Bob Bors

GENOTYPIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON BREAD-MAKING QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT IN ROMANIA

ANALYSIS OF CLIMATIC FACTORS IN CONNECTION WITH STRAWBERRY GENERATIVE BUD DEVELOPMENT

Development and characterization of wheat breads with chestnut flour. Marta Gonzaga. Raquel Guiné Miguel Baptista Luísa Beirão-da-Costa Paula Correia

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2014

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

Progress Report on Avocado Breeding

Corresponding author: Ornella K Sangma

FALL TO WINTER CRANBERRY PLANT HARDINESS

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(3): Amit Tomar, Mahak Singh and LP Tiwari

Transcription:

ASSESSMENT OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND SEED QUALITY TRAITS IN BRASSICA CARINATA LANDRACE GENOTYPES, DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES AND HYBRIDS ABRAHA E., KLÍMA M., VYVADILOVÁ M., BECHYN M. Abstract The present study was undertaken to evaluate some important agronomic traits (yield, 1000 seed weight, plant height, oil content and fatty acid composition) and crossability of B. carinata and B. napus in the green house. Remarkable changes in oil (32.49%) and erucic acid (20%) content were recorded in crossing of DH BC with DH BN SL-730. Satisfactory combining ability of several DH lines of BC resulted in heterosis effect in obtained hybrids. Hybrids between DH lines of BC 6 with DH line BC showed intermediate height of their parents. The DH line proved to be the most productive DH regenerant in our experiments. Therefore interspecific and intraspecific hybridization in Brassicas can lead to wider utilization of Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard) in food and feed industry. Key words: Brassica carinata, Brassica napus, interspecific hybrids, seed oil quality INTRODUCTION Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) has long been known to be one of the oldest crops in the plateaus of east Africa (Gomez-Campo and Prakash, 1999). The crop has good agronomic traits like high yielding, better resistance to disease, insect pests and seed shattering than any one of the oilseed crops adapted to comparable areas (Nigussie et al., 2001), with the additional agronomic advantage of its better tolerance to semiarid conditions However, it possesses high erucic acid in the oil and high glucosinolate content in the meal. Recently, researchers in Canada, Spain and India showed interest to this crop due to its tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress under semiarid conditions (Rakow, 1995). Analysis of genetic relationships in crop species is an important component of crop improvement. It helps to analyse genetic variability of cultivars select parental materials for hybridisation for making new genetic recombinations, select inbred parents or tester for maximum heterotic response and identify materials that should be maintained to preserve maximum genetic diversity in germplasm sources (Adefris and Becker, 2005). Efforts have been made to develop low-erucic acid genotypes of B. carinata utilizing different strategies such as inter-specific crossing with B. napus (Fernandez-Escobar et al., 1988, or with B. juncea (Getinet et al., 1994), induction of mutations (Velasco et al., 1995a) or continued crossing and pedigree selection within the B. carinata germplasm (Alonso et al., 1990). Main objectives of the present study were to assess and compare some agriculturally important traits in selected landrace genotypes, doubled haploid lines and hybrids of B. carinata and partially B. napus genotypes with the possibility to identify perspective plant materials, utilisable in consecutive breeding programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant materials Two high productive doubled haploid (DH) lines of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) (BN) C-612 from Breeding Station Chlumec nad Cidlinou, Selgen, Inc. and SL-730 from Breeding Station Slapy u Tábora, Sempra Praha, Inc., one commercial cultivar Labrador, four genotypes BC 1, BC 2, BC 4, BC 6 and one cultivar of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) and subsequently derived DH lines (Eyasu et al., 2007) and hybrids, were used for experiments. Hybridization Young flower buds of appropriate size of female parents, supposed to be open in the next morning, were emasculated and other opened flowers and immature buds were removed. The emasculated buds were then pollinated with fresh pollen collected from male parents and were covered immediately with bags from unwoven cloth to protect the pollinated stigma for about 5 7 days. Recording of data for agronomic characters Data for different characters, i.e. plant height (5 plants in each genotype), number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, weight of seeds per plant, 1 000 seedweight (three plants in each genotype), oil content and fatty acid content (assessed from the populations, donor plants, DH regenerants and hybrids) were recorded. Determination of seed oil quality Single fatty acid (FA) assessment in seeds of oilseed rape was carried out in Research Institute of Oilseed Crops in Opava according to the Model of single fatty acid assessment in rapeseed oil by the method of Gas Chromatography (GC) modified for the analysis of single seed sample (Kolovrat, 1985). Methylesters of 150

fatty acids were analysed on gas chromatograph CHROM 5 with writer type TZ4200, using glass column (2.5 mm length, 3 mm inside diameter) with the refill: 3% SP-2310/2% SP-2300 at 100/120 Chromosorb WAW (SUPELCO). Temperature program was used in the analysing process. RESULTS In total, 854 emasculated flowers were pollinated with pollen collected from selected parents. While the success of the hybridization within genotypes of B. carinata was relatively high (from 76.2% to 90.8%), interspecific hybridization with B. napus genotypes was less efficient (Table 1), both in case of the B. carinata mother parent and reciprocal crossings (from 18.6 to 27.0%). Moreover, the number of seeds per pod obtained from intraspecific hybridization experiments (9.4 14.4) was nearly six times higher than in case of interspecific hybridization with B. napus (1.6 2.7). Better results were obtained from crossings with B. napus as a moth- er, where the number of seeds per pod varied from 4.2 to 6.4 (Table 1). Seed colour of selected genotypes and resulting hybrids is documented in Figure 6. According to statistical analysis, the effect of a genotype on the plant height was significant. Measured plant height of tested B. carinata DH plants and hybrids varied significantly from 1 200 mm in the DH line of the genotype BC 6 to 1 466 mm in the DH line of genotype (Table 2, Figure 3). Both hybrids between selected DH lines ( x BC 4 and x BC 6) achieved intermediate height of their parents (1 356 mm and 1 296 mm). Additionally, mean heights of DH and DH BC 6 genotypes were significantly different both from each other and from all other DH lines and hybrids tested (Table 2, Figure 3). The impact of a genotype on the number of pods per plant was relevant. The lowest mean number of pods per plant was obtained in the DH line BC 6 (250.3); significantly higher numbers of pods were observed in DH lines BC 1 (310.3), (360.0) and in F1 hybrids between DH and DH BC 6 (339.7) and between DH and BC 4 (295.0). Moreover, the number of pods in the DH line was significantly higher than in other genotypes tested, except one F1 hybrid (Table 3, Figure 4). Tab. 1: Crossability within genotypes of Brassica carinata and Brassica napus Crossing results Crossing combinations DH BC x DH BC 1 DH BC x DH BC 2 DH BC x DH BC 4 DH BC x DH BC 6 (DH BC x DH BC 4) x DH BC (DH BC x DH BC 6) x DH BC DH BC x DH BN SL-730 Reciprocal DH BC x DH BN OP-612 Reciprocal DH BC x BN Labrador Reciprocal Cross Total Reciprocal No. of flowers pollinated No. of pods developed No. of developed pods with seeds % of success Total no. of seeds obtained No. of seeds per pollination No. of seeds per pod a b c (c/a)x100 d d/a d/b 87 80 75 86.2 750 8.60 9.4 65 61 59 90.8 855 13.10 14.0 102 89 82 80.4 1025 10.00 11.5 91 85 71 78.0 958 10.50 11.3 59 51 49 83.1 735 12.45 14.4 42 37 32 76.2 416 9.90 11.2 82 39 97 43 89 58 714 140 36 15 31 18 35 22 505 55 17 9 18 11 24 15 427 35 20.7 23.1 18.6 25.6 27.0 25.9 59.8 25.0 59 63 67 88 94 142 4959 293 0.72 1.60 0.69 2.00 1.00 2.44 6.90 2.10 1.6 4.2 2.2 4.9 2.7 6.4 9.8 5.3 151

Tab. 2: Plant height (in millimetres) in selected DH lines and hybrids of B. carinata Genotype Replication 1 2 3 4 5 Mean SD Groups DH 1480 1420 1450 1480 1500 1466 31.30495 a DH BC 1 1400 1410 1380 1400 1370 1392 16.43168 b DH BC 4 1400 1320 1400 1420 1250 1358 71.55418 bc DH x DH BC 4 1380 1350 1330 1370 1350 1356 19.49359 bc DH BC 2 1350 1320 1270 1300 1320 1312 29.49576 c DH x DH BC 6 1320 1350 1200 1360 1250 1296 68.77500 c DH BC 6 1140 1220 1300 1140 1200 1200 66.33250 d Letters a d designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) derived from multiple comparisons between means SD Standard Deviation Tab. 3: Number of pods per plant in selected DH lines and hybrids of B. carinata Genotype Replication 1 2 3 Mean SD Groups DH 405 325 350 360.00 40.92676 a DH x DH BC 6 355 320 344 339.67 17.89786 ab DH BC 1 300 337 294 310.33 23.28805 bc DH x DH BC 4 315 292 278 295.00 18.68154 c DH BC 2 284 291 265 280.00 13.45362 cd DH BC 4 270 282 274 275.33 6.11010 cd DH BC 6 259 247 245 250.33 7.57188 d Letters a d designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) derived from multiple comparisons between means SD Standard Deviation Tab. 4: Seed yield (in grams) per plant in selected DH lines and hybrids of B. carinata Genotype Replication 1 2 3 Mean SD Groups DH x DH BC 6 45.40 39.80 44.30 43.17 2.96704 a DH x DH BC 4 36.80 34.30 35.00 35.37 1.28970 b DH 32.80 29.50 31.80 31.37 1.69214 c DH BC 6 31.50 28.30 29.70 29.83 1.60416 c DH BC 1 25.00 26.30 23.60 24.97 1.35031 d DH BC 4 23.10 18.50 20.00 20.53 2.34592 e DH BC 2 20.10 20.50 19.80 20.13 0.35119 e Letters a e designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) derived from multiple comparisons between means SD Standard Deviation Fundamental differences were detected between genotypes of B. carinata in case of the seed yield per plant. Generally, heterosis effect was confirmed in our experiments. Both hybrids (DH x DH BC 6 and DH x DH BC 4) were significantly more productive than all DH lines tested (Table 4, Figure 5). The less productive DH lines, genotypes BC 2 and BC 4, yielded only 20.1 and 20.5 g of seed per plant, while the yield in the best F1 hybrid was more than double (43.2 g per plant). Best DH lines, and BC 6, produced 31.4 and 29.8 g of seed per plant. The results showed only slight differences between 1 000 seed weight (Table 5) of DH lines (3.8 5.6 g) and correspondent original genotypes (4.7 5.7 g). In general, results obtained from hybrid plants showed greater differences in 1 000 seed weight compared to DH lines and populations as well. The highest rates were obtained in hybrids (BC 6 x ) x and 152

Tab. 5: 1 000 seed weight, oil content and fatty acid composition in the seed of selected genotypes of B. carinata and B. napus planted in the glasshouse Genotype Faty acid content in oil [%] 1000 seed weight [g] Oil content [%] in dry matter Palmitic 16:0 Stearic 18:0 Oleic 18:1 Linolic 18:2 Linolenic 18:3 Arachic 20:0 Eicosenoic 20:1 Eicosadienic 20:2 Behenic 22:0 Erucic 22:1 Docosadienic 22:2 Population BC 1 4.71 35.76 2.7 0.7 9.3 19.3 14.2 0.6 6.2 0.8 0.5 44.2 1.2 BC 2 4.97 26.34 2.8 0.9 10.5 19.3 18.6 0.8 6.3 0.9 0.7 38.0 1.2 BC 4 5.22 28.21 3.4 0.7 5.7 14.4 17.7 0.7 6.7 0.8 0.6 47.4 1.8 BC 6 4.64 27.85 2.7 0.9 8.9 19.7 13.7 0.8 5.6 0.8 0.8 44.6 1.5 BC 5.29 30.98 2.8 1.0 10.4 14.4 11.2 0.9 10.5 0.9 0.5 46.4 1.1 BC (field condition) 5.66 54.70 3.1 0.7 11.8 15.1 14.6 0.8 7.4 1.0 0.6 43.4 1.6 Doubled haploid line DH BC 1 3.76 20.70 3.1 0.7 8.7 17.4 15.5 0.8 6.4 1.0 0.6 44.2 1.7 DH BC 2 4.48 20.24 2.9 0.9 9.7 20.0 11.3 1.1 5.7 0.9 1.0 44.4 2.0 DH BC 4 5.60 25.40 2.4 0.6 10.3 17.0 14.7 0.7 6.5 1.0 0.6 44.3 1.8 DH BC 6 4.43 26.10 2.6 0.7 9.3 19.4 14.5 0.7 6.5 1.1 0.6 43.1 1.6 DH BC 5.19 25.29 4.1 0.6 8.6 18.4 17.3 0.7 6.5 1.0 0.4 40.7 1.7 DH BN SL-730 5.32 37.38 5.3 1.1 68.5 16.5 6.0 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 Hybridization DH BC 4 x DH BC 6.51 29.80 2.6 0.7 11.6 18.1 15.0 0.7 6.3 0.9 0.7 41.9 1.5 DH BC 1 x DH BC 5.12 32.26 2.6 0.7 10.3 17.1 14.9 0.6 6.9 1.0 0.6 43.7 1.7 DH BC 6 x DH BC 4.92 29.46 3.0 0.8 10.5 19.9 12.3 0.7 6.3 1.0 0.7 43.0 1.6 DH BC 2 x DH BC 4.83 24.66 2.9 0.8 10.8 18.0 13.0 0.7 7.5 1.0 0.7 43.1 1.5 (DH BC 6 x DH BC Dod.) x DH BC Dod. 6.96 30.88 2.6 0.6 8.6 16.7 15.5 1.1 7.1 1.1 0.6 44.1 2.0 DH x DH BN SL-730 4.85 32.49 3.6 0.9 36.8 18.9 12.2 1.0 3.9 0.5 0.4 20.8 0.9 DH doubled haploid line BC Brassica carinata BN Brassica napus BC 4 x (7.0 g and 6.5 g), the smallest in the DH line BC 1 (3.8 g). One B. napus genotype, DH line SL- 730, displayed moderate rate 5.3 g (Figure 1). Oil content in the dry matter of seeds, harvested from plants maintained in the glasshouse, was the highest in the B. napus DH line SL-730 (37.4%) and in the B. carinata genotype BC 1 (35.8%). Good results were obtained also in genotype (31.0%) and in almost all crosses with the DH line (Table 5, Figure 2). Worse results were obtained in case of all B. carinata DH lines. The lowest oil content was determined in genotypes DH BC 2 (20.2%) and DH BC 1 (20.7%). Fatty acid composition of oil in selected genotypes is presented in the Table 5. Only slight or no differences in the content of individual fatty acids were observed in all tested genotypes of B. carinata (including populations, derived DH lines and hybrids). Characteristic composition of B. carinata and B. napus oil, represented by genotypes DH BC and DH BN SL-730, is shown in Figure 7. The same figure and the Table 5 shows dramatic changes of the fatty acid composition after interspecific hybridization between B. carinata (female) and B. napus. Resulting hybrid has approximately half content of erucic, eicosenoic, eicosadienic and docosadienic acid than the mother genotype (B. carinata, DH line ); marked decrease can be seen in the content of linolenic acid as well. On the other hand, more than four times higher content was observed in case of oleic acid (36.8%, was 8.6%). DISCUSSION Good results obtained from hybridizations within B. carinata landrace genotypes, where about 80% of pollinated flowers formed pods, are caused most likely by the genetic relationship of genotypes used. Thus, no genetic barriers, which are often seen during intergeneric and interspecific hybridization experiments, were 153

observed. Similar results were described by Malek et al. (2006) in interspecific hybridization between B. carinata and B. rapa. In contrast, crossings with unrelated genotypes of B. napus showed far worse results, where only approx. one fifth of pollinated flowers created pods with seeds. Also Choudhary et al. (2000) in Brassica interspecific crossing detected outstanding decrease in the number of developing pods in comparison with intraspecific hybridization. Moreover, the number of seed per pod was unsatisfactory in case of interspecific hybridization with B. napus as well, when only about two seeds per pod were observed. Conformable results were presented by Malek et al. (2006) in interspecific hybridization between Brassica carinata and Brassica rapa, where the number of seeds per pod varied from one to ten. Slightly better results were recorded when B. napus genotypes were used as mother components and pollinated with B. carinata. In this case the number of seeds per pod was almost half (about five seeds) of numbers obtained from intraspecific hybridization within B. carinata genotypes (about 11 seeds per pod). Positive effect of reciprocal crossings was also reported in cross between B. rapa and B.carinata by Malek et al. (2006). Significant effect of a genotype on the plant height, number of pods per plant and the seed yield per plant was confirmed in our experiments and were already recorded for example in interspecific hybridization of B.carinata and B. napus by Bechyn (1992). From the set of genotypes tested, contrast DH lines could be selected. For instance, one DH line of the genotype BC 6 was only 1 200 mm high, while one DH line of the genotype more than 1 460 mm. Hybrids between above mentioned lines showed intermediate heights of their parents. The DH line proved to be the most productive in our experiments with the yield greater than 40 grams per plant, most likely due to its height and the number of pods per plant. Good combining ability of some tested DH lines, represented by heterosis effect, was confirmed in our experiments. Both hybrids were significantly more productive than the better of parents. Although there were visible differences in oil content between materials tested and contrast genotypes with high and low rates could be selected, overall percentage rate of oil content was rather low. For instance, one tested DH line of B. napus, SL- 730, recorded only about 37 % of oil in the dry matter of seed, whereas common value for B. napus is usually about 60% and about 37 45% in B. carinata genotypes. These poor results could be most likely caused by different conditions in the field and in the glasshouse, where the plants were maintained till the harvest. For example, genotype maintained in the glasshouse recorded only about 31% of oil in the dry matter. The same genotype produced almost 55% of oil in the seed, when planted and finally harvested in the field. In spite of previously mentioned results, from our experiments can be seen markedly lower oil content in all DH lines in comparison with initial genotypes and hybrids. Concordant findings were made by Anke et al. (2007) in B. napus as well. This might be caused by some stress effects, acting within regeneration processes of doubled haploid plants and thus negatively affect physiological condition of regenerants and even maturing plants, or it might be evoked by the genotypic background of obtained DH regenerants. No important differences were observed in the fatty acid composition between original landrace genotypes, DH lines and their hybrids of B. carinata. Contents of individual major and minor fatty acids in tested genotypes corresponded with the previous observations in genotypes of B. carinata. Huge changes were recorded after hybridization with B. napus especially in the content of erucic and oleic acid as the fatty acid composition of both parents is very different. Similar results were provided by Choudhary et al. (2000); Malek et al. (2006) in interspecific hybridization between B. carinata and B. rapa. CONCLUSION Some important agricultural traits were assessed in various genotypes of B. carinata. Although hybridization experiments within related genotypes showed good results both in the number of pods per plant and seeds per pod, the same values concerning interspecific hybridizations were unsatisfactory. To obtain better results in genotypes used, B. napus used as a mother component. Significant impact of a genotype on some important agronomical characteristics (plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and the seed yield) was statistically verified. Satisfactory combining ability of several DH lines resulted in heterosis effect in obtained hybrids. Contrast DH lines in all above mentioned traits can be selected as perspective initial materials utilizable in consecutive breeding procedures. Although marked differences between genotypes were detected in case of oil content, the percentages observed were considerably lower than those for corresponding B. carinata and B. napus genotypes previously published. This might be caused by different conditions between the glasshouse and the field. To obtain more accurate results, seeds for oil content analysis should be collected from plants maintained in the field. In spite of these results, lower content of oil in all DH lines in comparison with original genotypes and hybrids was evident and might be among others caused by the different physiological state of DH regenerants, derived from microspore embryos. Thus, it can be recommended to evaluate DH lines subsequently multiplied from seeds, not direct DH regenerants. The fatty acid composition of tested B. carinata materials did not differ much between individual genotypes. Striking change in the content was recorded after hybridization with B. napus and thus can be utilized in breeding programs aimed at the improvement of Ethiopian mustard and lead to wider use of that important crop in food and feed industry. 154

Acknowledgement This research was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, Project No. 0002700602. REFERENCES ADEFRIS T., BECKER C. (2005): Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of Ethiopian mustard inbred lines. Crop Science, 45: 2629 2635. ALONSO L.C., FERNANDEZ-SERRANO O. FERNANDEZ- ESCOBAR J. (1991): The onset of a new oilseed crop: Brassica carinata with low erucic acid content. In Proc 8 th int. Rapeseed Conf., pp. 170 176. Saskatoon, 9 11 July 1991. GCIRC, Saskatoon, SK. BECHYN M., SABHARWAL P.S. (1992): Interspecific hybridization in the Genus Brassica. Sborník Vysoké školy zem d lské v Praze, Agronomická fakulta, ada A, 54: 259 268. CHOUDHARY B.R., JOSHI P., RAMARAO S. (2000): Interspecific hybridization between B. carinata and B. rapa. Plant Breeding, 119 (5): 417 420. CHOUDHARY B.R., RAHMAN L., DAS M.L., HASSAN L. (2006): Development of interspecific hybrids between Brassica carinata and B. rapa. Bangladesh J. Agril. Sci., 33 (1): 21 25. EYASU A., BECHYNE M., KLIMA M., VYVADILOVA M. (2007): Embryogenic responsibility of selected genotypes Brassica carinata A. Braun to microspore culture. Agriculture Tropica et Subtropica, 40 (2): 35 38. FERNANDEZ-ESCOBAR J., DOMINQUEZ J., MARTIN A., FERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ J.M. (1988): Genetic of erucic acid content in interspecific hybrids of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata Braun) and rapeseed (B. napus L.). Plant breeding, 100: 310 315. GEHRINGER A., SNOWDON R., SPILLER T., BASUNANDA P., FRIEDT W. (2007): New Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) Hybrids with High Levels of Heterosis for Seed Yield under Nutrient-poor Conditions. Breed. Sci., 57: 315 320. GETINET A., RAOW G., RANEY J.P., DOWNEY R.K. (1994): Development of Zero-erucic acid Ethiopian mustrad through interspecific cross with Zero-erucic acid Oriental mustard. Can. J. Plant Sci., 74: 793 795. MALEK M.A., RAHMAN L., DAS M.L., HASSAN L. (2006): Development of interspecific hybrids between Brassica carinata and B. rapa. Bangladesh J. Agril. Sci, 33 (1): 21 25. NIGUSSIE A., BECKER H.C. (2001): Variation and inheritance of erucic acid content in Brassica carinata germplasm collection from Ethiopia. Plant breeding, 120: 331 335. RAKOW G. (1995): Development in the breeding of edible oil in other Brassica species. In: Proceedings of the 9 th international Rapeseed Conference, 4 7 July, 1995. Cambridge, U.K., pp. 401 406. VELASCOL L., FERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ J., DE HARO D. (1995): Isolation of induced mutants in Ethiopian mustard with low level of erucic acid. Plant Breeding, 114: 454 456. Received for publication on September 4, 2008 Accepted for publication on October 16, 2008 155

FIGURES Figure 1: 1000 seed weight in selected genotypes of B. carinata, B. napus and their hybrids [g] 7.50 7.00 6.96 6.50 6.51 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 5.60 5.32 5.29 5.22 5.19 5.12 4.97 4.92 4.85 4.83 4.71 4.64 4.48 4.43 4.00 3.76 3.50 Blue Populations, Green DH lines, Red Hybrids Figure 2: Oil content in the seed of selected genotypes of B. carinata and B. napus planted in the glasshouse (in % of dry matter) [%] 40.00 37.38 35.76 35.00 32.49 32.26 30.00 30.98 30.88 29.80 29.46 28.21 27.85 25.00 26.34 26.10 25.40 25.29 24.66 20.00 20.70 20.24 15.00 DH BN SL-730 BC 1 DH x DH BN SL-730 DH BC 1 x DH BC BC (DH BC 6 x DH BC Dod.) x DH BC Dod. DH BC 4 x DH BC DH BC 6 x DH BC BC 4 BC 6 BC 2 DH BC 6 DH BC 4 DH BC DH BC 2 x DH BC DH BC 1 DH BC 2 (DH BC 6 x DH BC Dod.) x DH BC Dod. DH BC 4 x DH BC DH BC 4 DH BN SL-730 BC BC 4 DH BC DH BC 1 x DH BC BC 2 DH BC 6 x DH BC DH x DH BN SL-730 DH BC 2 x DH BC BC 1 BC 6 DH BC 2 DH BC DH BC 1 Blue Populations, Green DH lines, Red Hybrids 156

Figure 3: Plant height in selected genotypes of B. carinata and their crosses; pooled data for five successive replications Bars represent individual 95% confidence intervals Letters a-d designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) Figure 4: Number of pods per plant in selected genotypes of B. carinata and their crosses; pooled data for three successive replications Bars represent individual 95% confidence intervals Letters a-d designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) 157

Figure 5: Seed yield per plant in selected genotypes of B. carinata and their crosses; pooled data for three successive replications Bars represent individual 95% confidence intervals Letters a-e designate homogeneous groups (LSD; P = 0.05) Figure 6: Seed colour in selected genotypes of B. carinata, B. napus and their hybrids Spot diameter = 60 mm 1 BC 4 2 DH BC 3 DH BC 4 x DH BC 4 (DH BC 4 x DH BC ) x DH BC 5 DH BN SL-730 6 BC DH x DH BN SL-730 158

Figure 7: Fatty acid composition of oil in the seed of DH lines and in F1 hybrid between B. carinata and B. napus SL- 730 DH BC Docosadienic; 1.7% Stearic; 0.6% Palmitic; 4.1% Oleic; 8.6% Erucic; 40.7% Linolic; 18.4% Behenic; 0.4% Eicosadienic; 1.0% Eicosenoic; 6.5% Arachic; 0.7% Linolenic; 17.3% DH BN SL-730 Erucic; 0.2% Behenic; 0.3% Eicosadienic; 0.0% Eicosenoic; 1.2% Arachic; 0.7% Linolenic; 6.0% Docosadienic; 0.0% Palmitic; 5.3% Stearic; 1.1% Linolic; 16.5% Oleic; 68.6% DH BC x BN DH S-730 Behenic; 0.4% Erucic; 20.8% Docosadienic; 0.9% Palmitic; 3.6% Stearic; 0.9% Eicosadienic; 0.5% Eicosenoic; 3.9% Oleic; 36.8% Arachic; 1.0% Linolenic; 12.2% Linolic; 18.9% Corresponding author: Ing. Eyasu Abraha Alle, Ph.D. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Institute of Tropics and Subtropics Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague 6 Czech Republic e-mail: eyasuabraha@gmail.com 159