Problem Set #3 Key. Forecasting

Similar documents
Problem Set #15 Key. Measuring the Effects of Promotion II

2007 Sonoma Research Associates - All rights reserved.

Napa Highway 29 Open Wineries

Price monitoring of key food items in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts

Coffee prices maintain downward trend as 2015/16 production estimates show slight recovery

Coffee market remains volatile but lacks direction

GLOBAL DAIRY UPDATE KEY DATES MARCH 2017

SFR Condo Residential Lot Sales Inventory Sales Inventory Sales Inventory. Month YTD Month Month YTD Month Month YTD Month

Coffee market ends 2017/18 in surplus

Sugar scenario in CIS countries:

SFR Condo Residential Lot Sales Inventory Sales Inventory Sales Inventory. Month YTD Month Month YTD Month Month YTD Month

SFR Condo Residential Lot Sales Inventory Sales Inventory Sales Inventory. Month YTD Month Month YTD Month Month YTD Month

Coffee market continues downward trend

For personal use only

SFR Condo Residential Lot Sales Inventory Sales Inventory Sales Inventory. Month YTD Month Month YTD Month Month YTD Month

World coffee consumption increases but prices still low

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Record exports from Brazil weigh heavy on the coffee market

World Cocoa Prices. Commodity Prices Update: Coffee, Cocoa, and Cotton. Joelle Cook and Professor C. Leigh Anderson

Mango Retail Performance Report 2017

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX : April April 2014 Local, imported and all items

Improving Capacity for Crime Repor3ng: Data Quality and Imputa3on Methods Using State Incident- Based Repor3ng System Data

Seasonal trends in hectares planted, sales volumes on markets and market prices. Pieter van Zyl, Potatoes South Africa

Growing divergence between Arabica and Robusta exports

Networkers Business Update. December 2014

IN THIS ISSUE FEBRUARY Financial Calendar: Late September 2014 Annual Results Announced. 26 March 2014 Interim Results Announced

Coffee market ends 2014 at ten month low

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 06 FEBRUARY 2019

Coffee Season 2013/14 Finishes in Balance but Deficit Expected Next Year

Volatility returns to the coffee market as prices stay low

WEEKLY OILSEED REPORT 31 OCTOBER 2018

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 13 JUNE 2018

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 28 NOVEMBER 2018

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 11 JULY 2018

Record Exports for Coffee Year 2016/17

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 30 OCTOBER 2018

PEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT

much better than in As may be seen in Table 1, the futures market prices for the next 12 months

Record exports in coffee year 2017/18

Dairy Outlook. December By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Consumer Price Index

Coffee market ends 2016/17 coffee year in deficit for the third consecutive year

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Coffee market settles lower amidst strong global exports

Britain s best-selling baking magazines

Composition and Value of Loin Primals

Appendix A Quick Facts

TRENDS IN SALES OF MILK & DAIRY PRODUCTS A RETAIL PERSPECTIVE. Milk Market Observatory 25 January 2017

Downward correction as funds respond to increasingly positive supply outlook

2018/19 expected to be the second year of surplus

Coffee prices rose slightly in January 2019

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

THOMSON REUTERS INDICES CONTINUOUS COMMODITY TOTAL RETURN INDEX

Import Export of fresh fruit & vegetables 2007

WEEKLY OILSEED REPORT 22 NOVEMBER 2018

Cultivation Pattern:

July marks another month of continuous low prices

WEEKLY OILSEED REPORT 27 JUNE 2018

The Changing Landscape of Dairy: A Regional Outlook. Mark Stephenson Director of Dairy Policy Analysis

Pinto and Great Northern Bean Prices: Historical Trends and Seasonal Patterns

Welcome to our May 2014 Global Dairy Update

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

WEEKLY MAIZE REPORT 13 DECEMBER 2017

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Globalization of Agriculture: An Ownership and Market Perspective. Ken Sullivan March 7, 2017

Dairy Market. May 2017

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Corn and Soybean CORN OUTLOOK SOYBEAN OUTLOOK STATISTICS AND ANALYSIS

MANGO PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK REPORT

WFP MONTHLY MARKET UPDATE

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COFFEE MARKET REPORT. November 2004

Welcome to our June 2014 Global Dairy Update

Advanced Paper 1: Markets and how they work. Sample assessment materials for first teaching September 2015 Time: 2 hours

Sugar Industry Update

Raw Materials Usage and Feed Production Returns

MGEX Spring Wheat 2013

Overview of the Manganese Industry

Coffee market recovers slightly from December slump

Prices for all coffee groups increased in May

Brazil. Coffee Annual. Coffee

Economic Losses from Pollution Closure of Clam Harvesting Areas in Machias Bay

Fresh Produce Report. P13: 12 w/e 3rd January Kantar Worldpanel

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Raw Materials Usage and Feed Production Returns

Global Considerations

BRUSSELS, 4 OCTOBER 2012 HANS-CHRISTOPH BEHR, AMI, BONN

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

OUR POTENTIAL. Business Update MAY 2017

Lady Manners School Lunch Menu

Blow Molding Machine Produced by IAR Team Focus Technology Co., Ltd

UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS

Barilla Pasta Meal Seasons Post- Holiday Bemer For You

Revisiting the most recent Napa vintages

Federal Milk Market Administrator U.S. Department of Agriculture. H. Paul Kyburz, Market Administrator

HUNTINGTON PRECIPITATION Water Accumulation in Inches

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Gavin Quinney s Bordeaux Report

Mealybug Species. Vine Mealybug. Grape and Obscure Mealybugs. Longtailed Mealybug. Pink Hibiscus Mealybug. Gills Mealybug

Transcription:

Problem Set #3 Key Sonoma State University Business 581E Dr. Cuellar The data set bus581e_ps3.dta is a Stata data set containing annual sales (cases) and revenue from December 18, 2004 to April 2 2011. Use Stata and Excel to answer following questions. Your typed answers are due at the beginning of the next class. Answers must be presented in a professional manner for full credit. You may want to export your data into Excel to generate graphs for aesthetic purposes. Forecasting 1. Sales a. Show graphically sales for the entire time span. b. Construct a regression model of sales that accounts for a time trend in sales and seasonal variations. Show and explain your results. Cases = β 0 + β 1time 12 + DMonth k +u i k=2 β k c. Show graphically your predicted results along with your actual sales. Total Cases Sold 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 01jan2005 01jul2006 01jan2008 01jul2009 01jan2011 Date Actual Predicted

d. Re-run your regression on a sub-sample (hold-out sample) of your data. Hold out the last 13 periods. Show and explain your results. Compare with your regression results from the full sample. Full Sample Hold-Out Sample Cases Cases Time 326.613 317.42 [28.66]** [21.39]** February -11,242.47-10,801.92 [8.53]** [7.53]** March -11,708.08-10,707.84 [8.88]** [7.46]** April -11,161.12-10,218.09 [8.46]** [7.12]** May -14,056.34-13,109.67 [11.30]** [9.47]** June -13,887.43-13,231.25 [10.53]** [9.22]** July -14,935.87-13,840.58 [11.68]** [9.99]** August -15,289.82-14,453.06 [11.14]** [9.60]** September -13,988.94-13,743.68 [10.19]** [9.13]** October -12,204.88-12,054.10 [8.89]** [8.00]** November -7,446.66-6,898.52 [5.42]** [4.58]** December 465.899 853.42 [0.35] [0.59] Constant 35,927.44 35,542.35 [34.45]** [31.27]** Observations 83 70 Adjusted R 2 0.94 0.91 Absolute value of t-statistics in brackets * significant at 5% level; ** significant at 1% level

e. Compare the predictions from your full sample regression with those of the hold-out sample regression. Specifically, compare the difference between actual and predicted results in units and percentage terms. Construct a table as follows: Full Sample Hold-Out Sample Forecast Difference %Difference Forecast Difference %Difference 1-May-10 45060.62-2655.62-6.26% 44969.49-2564.49-6.05% 29-May-10 45387.23 1160.766 2.49% 45286.91 1261.094 2.71% 26-Jun-10 45882.75 221.25 0.48% 45482.75 621.25 1.35% 24-Jul-10 45160.93-3095.93-7.36% 45190.84-3125.84-7.43% 21-Aug-10 45133.59-603.586-1.36% 44895.77-365.773-0.82% 18-Sep-10 46761.09 2399.914 4.88% 45922.57 3238.426 6.59% 16-Oct-10 48871.75 2918.246 5.63% 47929.57 3860.426 7.45% 13-Nov-10 53956.59 977.4141 1.78% 53402.57 1531.426 2.79% 11-Dec-10 62195.76 1833.238 2.86% 61471.94 2557.063 3.99% 8-Jan-11 62056.47 4213.527 6.36% 60935.94 5334.063 8.05% 5-Feb-11 51140.62 1625.383 3.08% 50451.44 2314.563 4.39% 5-Mar-11 51001.62-1677.62-3.40% 50862.94-1538.94-3.12% 2-Apr-11 51875.19-1279.19-2.53% 51670.11-1074.11-2.12% How well does the hold-out sample compare with the full sample results?

f. Use the full sample of data to forecast sales for 13 periods beyond the end of the data. g. Construct a margin of error for your forecast and a 95% confidence interval. Show your results for f & g in a table as follows: Period Forecasted Sales Margin of Error Lower CI Upper CI 1 49306.59 1860.56 47446.03 51167.14 2 49802.11 2131.667 47670.44 51933.77 3 49080.29 2093.376 46986.91 51173.66 4 49052.94 2248.777 46804.16 51301.72 5 50680.44 2248.777 48431.66 52929.22 6 52791.11 2248.777 50542.33 55039.88 7 57875.94 2248.777 55627.16 60124.72 8 66115.12 2191.179 63923.94 68306.3 9 65975.83 2191.179 63784.65 68167.01 10 55059.97 2191.179 52868.79 57251.15 11 54920.97 2191.179 52729.79 57112.15 12 55794.54 2191.179 53603.36 57985.72 13 53225.94 2003.829 51222.11 55229.77 h. Show your results graphically. Be sure your graph clearly distinguishes between actual and predicted values. You may want to use Excel. Total Cases Sold 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 0 20 40 60 80 100 Date Actual Lower 95% CI Predicted Upper 95% CI

30-Apr-11 28-May-11 25-Jun-11 23-Jul-11 20-Aug-11 17-Sep-11 15-Oct-11 12-Nov-11 10-Dec-11 7-Jan-12 4-Feb-12 3-Mar-12 31-Mar-12 Sales (Cases) 70,000 65,000 Forecasted Sales Lower Confidence Interval Upper Confidence Interval Forecast 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000

2. Revenue a. Show graphically revenue for the entire time span. b. Construct a regression model of revenue that accounts for a time trend in revenue and seasonal variations. Show and explain your results. Revenue = β 0 + β 1time 12 + DMonth k +u i k=2 β k c. Show graphically your predicted results along with your actual revenue. Revenue 2.0e+06 4.0e+06 6.0e+06 8.0e+06 01jan2005 01jul2006 01jan2008 01jul2009 01jan2011 Date Actual Predicted

d. Re-run your regression on a sub-sample (hold-out sample) of your data. Hold out the last 13 periods. Show and explain your results. Compare with your regression results from the full sample. Full Sample Hold-Out Sample Revenue Revenue Time 41,891.66 42,353.19 [31.11]** [24.08]** February -1331846.375-1272860.185 [8.55]** [7.48]** March -1388236.465-1271334.702 [8.91]** [7.47]** April -1379528.697-1260346.054 [8.85]** [7.40]** May -1703024.547-1572700.858 [11.58]** [9.59]** June -1716002.344-1608645.649 [11.01]** [9.45]** July -1846491.565-1695770.964 [12.22]** [10.33]** August -1868417.563-1753123.544 [11.52]** [9.82]** September -1651441.724-1601510.328 [10.18]** [8.97]** October -1404461.718-1371862.713 [8.66]** [7.68]** November -873,340.71-798,461.10 [5.38]** [4.47]** December 2,430.66 58,715.02 [0.02] [0.35] Constant 4162495.469 4064491.299 [33.78]** [30.16]** Observations 83 70 Adjusted R 2 0.94 0.93 Absolute value of t-statistics in brackets * significant at 5% level; ** significant at 1% level

e. Compare the predictions from your full sample regression with those of the hold-out sample regression. Specifically, compare the difference between actual and predicted results in units and percentage terms. Construct a table as above. Full Sample Hold-Out Sample Forecast Difference %Diff Forecast Difference %Diff 1-May-10 $5,433,779 -$345,910-6.80% $5,498,867 -$410,998-8.08% 29-May-10 $5,475,671 -$2,631-0.05% $5,541,220 -$68,180-1.25% 26-Jun-10 $5,504,585 -$148,882-2.78% $5,547,628 -$191,925-3.58% 24-Jul-10 $5,415,987 -$463,166-9.35% $5,502,856 -$550,035-11.11% 21-Aug-10 $5,435,953 -$169,524-3.22% $5,487,857 -$221,428-4.20% 18-Sep-10 $5,694,820 $154,982 2.65% $5,681,823 $167,979 2.87% 16-Oct-10 $5,983,692 $239,337 3.85% $5,953,824 $269,204 4.33% 13-Nov-10 $6,556,705 $25,626 0.39% $6,569,579 $12,752 0.19% 11-Dec-10 $7,474,368 $157,553 2.06% $7,469,108 $162,812 2.13% 8-Jan-11 $7,513,829 $492,490 6.15% $7,452,746 $553,572 6.91% 5-Feb-11 $6,223,874 $135,804 2.14% $6,222,239 $137,438 2.16% 5-Mar-11 $6,209,375 -$214,459-3.58% $6,266,118 -$271,202-4.52% 2-Apr-11 $6,259,975 -$230,914-3.83% $6,319,460 -$290,399-4.82%

f. Use the full sample of data to forecast sales for 13 periods beyond the end of the data. g. Construct a margin of error for your forecast and a 95% confidence interval. Show your results for f & g in a table as above h. Show your results graphically. Be sure your graph clearly distinguishes between actual and predicted values. You may want to use Excel. Revenue 30-Apr-11 2.0e+06 4.0e+06 6.0e+06 8.0e+06 28-May-11 25-Jun-11 23-Jul-11 20-Aug-11 17-Sep-11 15-Oct-11 12-Nov-11 10-Dec-11 7-Jan-12 4-Feb-12 3-Mar-12 31-Mar-12 Revenue 0 20 40 60 80 100 Date Actual Lower 95% CI Predicted Upper 95% CI $9,000,000 $8,500,000 $8,000,000 Forecasted Revenue Lower Confidence Interval Upper Confidence Interval Forecast $7,500,000 $7,000,000 $6,500,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $5,000,000

Period Forecasted Revenue Margin of Error Lower CI Upper CI 1 $5,978,371 $219,840 $5,758,530 $6,198,211 2 $6,007,285 $251,874 $5,755,411 $6,259,159 3 $5,918,687 $247,349 $5,671,338 $6,166,037 4 $5,938,653 $265,711 $5,672,941 $6,204,364 5 $6,197,520 $265,711 $5,931,809 $6,463,232 6 $6,486,392 $265,711 $6,220,680 $6,752,103 7 $7,059,404 $265,711 $6,793,693 $7,325,116 8 $7,977,068 $258,906 $7,718,162 $8,235,973 9 $8,016,529 $258,906 $7,757,623 $8,275,434 10 $6,726,574 $258,906 $6,467,668 $6,985,479 11 $6,712,075 $258,906 $6,453,170 $6,970,981 12 $6,762,675 $258,906 $6,503,769 $7,021,580 13 $6,481,071 $236,769 $6,244,302 $6,717,839 Use the data set bus581e_ps1 to answer the following questions. 3. Trend Analysis a. Show graphically total cases sold by period for the duration of the data set. b. Calculate the percentage growth rate of total sales using regression analysis. c. Show graphically total cases sold of chardonnay by period for the duration of the data set. d. Calculate the percentage growth rate of total chardonnay sales using regression analysis. Has the growth rate of chardonnay sales been above or below total sales? e. Show graphically total cases of merlot sold by period for the duration of the data set. f. Calculate the percentage growth rate of total merlot sales using regression analysis. Has the growth rate of merlot sales been above or below total sales? g. Show graphically total cases sold of cabernet sauvignon by period for the duration of the data set. h. Calculate the percentage growth rate of total cabernet sauvignon sales using regression analysis. Has the growth rate of merlot sales been above or below total sales? i. Show graphically total cases sold, chardonnay, merlot and cabernet sauvignon sales together. Describe your graph. Regression Results Total Chardonnay Merlot Cabernet Sauvignon time 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.020 [13.31]** [18.59]** [5.11]** [22.18]** Constant 10.181 8.851 9.073 7.467 [324.46]** [435.15]** [212.46]** [174.12]** Observations 83 83 83 83 Adjusted R-squared 0.68 0.81 0.23 0.86 Absolute value of t-statistics in brackets * significant at 5% level; ** significant at 1% level Annual Growth Rate 11.83% 10.65% 6.02% 28.82% Compounding Annual Growth Rate 11.23% 10.16% 5.86% 25.57% Not Compounding

Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 70,000 Total 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 4-week ending period

Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 16,000 Chardonnay 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 4-week ending period

Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 18,000 16,000 Merlot 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 4-week ending period

Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 12,000 Cabernet Sauvignon 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 4-week ending period

Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 70,000 60,000 Chardonnay Merlot Total CB-S 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 4-week ending period

Indexed Cases Sold Per 4-week ending period 4. Indexing Trends a. Index total cases sold for the duration of the period and re-graph. Be sure that indexed cases sold are zero in the first period. Interpret your graph. b. Index total cases sold of chardonnay for the duration of the period and re-graph. Be sure that indexed cases sold are zero in the first period. Interpret your graph. c. Index total cases sold of merlot for the duration of the period and re-graph. Be sure that indexed cases sold are zero in the first period. Interpret your graph. d. Index total cases sold of cabernet sauvignon for the duration of the period and re-graph. Be sure that indexed cases sold are zero in the first period. Interpret your graph. e. Show graphically indexed total cases sold, indexed chardonnay, indexed merlot sales and indexed cabernet sauvignon sales together. Interpret your graph. 4.00 3.50 3.00 Chardonnay Merlot Total CB-S 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50-1.00 4-week ending period