WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Similar documents
Jonathan R. Schultheis Brad Thompson Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Hort. Series No. 187

2009 Watermelon Cultivar Trials

2011 Watermelon Cultivar Trials

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov

VARIETY TRIALS Shubin K. Saha and Dan Egel, SWPAC

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

2010 Watermelon Cultivar Trials

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

2012 North Carolina Watermelon Cultivar Trials. Hort. Series # 203

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials 2014

in nunhems. Watermelon Catalog

Evaluation of Seedless Watermelon Varieties for Production in Southwest Indiana, 2010

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Southwest Indiana Triploid Watermelon Variety Trial 2012

Organic Seed Partnership

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

2013 Watermelon Cultivar Trials

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Department of Horticulture ~ The Ohio State University

The UF/CREC Citrus Scion Breeding Program

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Icebox Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Methods

EVALUATION OF PUSH PLANTERS FOR SMALL PLOT WORK

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Statewide Summary: Sorghum Silage Performance, Georgia, 2018 Company or Hybrid or

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Determination of Fruit Sampling Location for Quality Measurements in Melon (Cucumis melo L.)

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Table of Contents Introduction Materials and Methods Results

SSIprhuInig 2(O1[i (Cortrneircua Vep9 (etth'1id)1k

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

REPORT to the California Tomato Commission Tomato Variety Trials: Postharvest Evaluations for 2006

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia Tifton Campus

1

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

2009 Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group Heirloom Tomato Project Summary Indiana

Cucumber. Honeydew. Gremlin (Slicer Green) Icebreaker (Slicer White) Estilo. Sweet Delight. Intermediate Resistance: Gc, Ccu, Psl, WMV, PRSV, ZYMV

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

~culture Series No. 5~

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

Melon Quality & Ripening

Specialty Melon Replicated Variety Evaluation and Observation Trial Introduction Materials and Methods Results Crenshaw.

2002 NEW JERSEY MEDIUM ROUND HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1. Rutgers Cooperative Extension INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of Heritage Beans in West Virginia

Pro user:t. A High " Quality. Plum For the Commercial Market

2003 BELL PEPPER VARIETY EVALUATION TRIALS

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Tomato Variety Descriptions

Proposed Potato Variety Release

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Common Pepper Cultivars for Florida Production 1

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Title: Plum / Roma Tomato Variety Trial 2014 (year 2 of 2) Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing Research Program

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

City Farm Fest Plant Guide 2015 Location: The Dudley Greenhouse, 11 Brooke Ave, Boston, MA

Agnieszka Masny Edward Żurawicz

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

Transcription:

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, 2004 George E. Boyhan 1, Darbie Granberry 2, Randy Hill 3, Thad Paulk 4 1 East Georgia Extension Center PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA 30460 gboyhan@uga.edu 2 University of Georgia Horticulture Department (Retired) PO Box 1209 Tifton, GA 31793 3 Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center 8163 Hwy 178 Lyons, GA 30436 4 University of Georgia Horticulture Department PO Box 748 Tifton, GA 31793-0748 Introduction Watermelon and cantaloupe variety trials were conducted at the Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center near Reidsville, GA in Toombs County. These annual trials are to determine suitability of varieties submitted by seed companies for production in Georgia. Methods There were 36 entries in the watermelon trial and seven in the cantaloupe trial. Plants were produced in a local greenhouse seeded on April 7, 2004 and transplanted to the field on May 18, 2004. Fields were prepared according to University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service recommendations for watermelon and cantaloupe production. Seven hundred fifty pounds of 10-10-10 fertilizer was preplant incorporated and an additional 750 pounds of 10-10-10 was applied approximately four weeks later just prior to vine coverage. Weed control followed University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service recommendations, however, no disease or insect control measures were taken. The experiments were arranged as randomized complete block designs with four replications. Watermelons were planted with an in-row spacing of 5 ft. and a between row spacing of 6 ft. Each plot (experimental unit) consisted of 10 plants. The cantaloupe experiment had plants set 3 ft in-row with a 6 ft between-row spacing and also had 10 plants per plot. Watermelons were harvested on July 8-9, 2004 and again on July 12, 2004. Cantaloupes were harvested on July 6 and 12, 2004. Data collected on the watermelon harvest included weight of each individual fruit, and two melons were cut from each plot to ascertain the length, width, rind depth, and 213

soluble solids (percent sugar). In addition, the color was rated from 1-5 with 1 indicating excellent color and 5 indicating poor color. The color assessment attempted to quantify the color quality without bias between dark red, red, and yellow fleshed melons. The watermelon description in table 1 is the seed company descriptor that was written on the seed packet or came with the seed. The comments are our comments as noted during melon cutting. Occasionally, there may be discrepancies in these comments, which reflect differences among replications primarily due to variability in the variety. Results The yield results of the watermelon trial are summarized in table 1. Yield ranged from 9,202 pounds per acre for WS Crimson Palm to 54,987 pounds per acre for Olé. The lower yields generally occurred among the smaller fruited watermelons, several of which had 100% of their fruit in the below 10 pound size class. The watermelon fruit characteristics are summarized in table 2. Recently, several seed companies have introduced palm or personal size watermelons. These watermelons are characterized by having weights averaging 3-7 pounds. Many are seedless and differ from other small seedless watermelons in having a very thin rind. We tested several in this class from Wannamaker Seed Co. and Rogers Seed Co. There were both seeded and seedless as well as red and yellow-fleshed varieties among the personal sized watermelon tested. Only four entries had any melons in the larger than 30 pound class. These varieties only had 1-2% of their melons in this size. The majority of entries had melons in the 10 to 20 pound size class. This reflects the demand in the commercial market for small to medium size melons. There continues to be a wide selection of watermelons from several different seed companies available in Georgia. No single variety dominates the market. Seeded and seedless watermelons continue to be grown in Georgia varying in size and rind type. Personal melons have found a niche, but are primarily being marketed directly by seed companies under contract production or exclusive release. This marketing method will garner higher profits for the seed companies, but may also reflect the fact that personal melons tend to have lower yields making it difficult for growers to make money on a per pound basis with these melons. The results of the cantaloupe trial are summarized in table 3. There were no statistically significant differences among the varieties in the trial. All were Athena type melons with the exception of WS-SP04, which we characterized as a honeydew. The seed company descriptor indicated it is a Sprite-type, but the fruit were larger than a typical sprite melon. No soluble sugars are reported this year for cantaloupe because the fruit were immature at harvest. In the past, we have had a lot of trouble with southern blight infecting the fruit immediately upon ripening particularly since we grow these on bareground. To combat this problem we harvested earlier than usual, however, the fruit never matured sufficiently postharvest to get an accurate reading of soluble sugars. We do feel the harvest otherwise reflects the potential for these varieties since the fruit had sized sufficiently. 214

Table 1. Watermelon Variety Trial, 2004. Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center, Lyons, GA Size Class (lbs) Yield 10 >10-20 >20-30 >30 Entry Company Description (lbs/acre) (%) Olé Willhite Diploid 54,987 6% 72% 21% 1% Wrigley Seminis 53,822 14% 78% 8% 0% Sweet Slice Willhite Triploid 53,150 18% 81% 1% 0% #7167 Abbott & Cobb Super Seedless Triploid 46,569 14% 85% 1% 0% Jamboree Rogers Hybrid 46,076 3% 70% 25% 1% WS Red Seedless MF Wannamaker Triploid, round, avg 5-7 kg, firm flesh, less prone to hollow heart 44,573 52% 48% 0% 0% Top Gun Rogers Hybrid 43,749 2% 62% 35% 2% WX207 Willhite Diploid 41,313 2% 72% 26% 0% WX270 Willhite Triploid (wilt resistant) 40,141 27% 72% 1% 0% WX257 Willhite Diploid 39,995 9% 81% 9% 0% #800 (ACX 5413) Abbott & Cobb Summer Flavor Hybrid 38,964 3% 77% 20% 0% RWT 8145 Rogers Hyb 3N 37,066 8% 83% 10% 0% Triploid (Smaller Cooperstown type) 36,863 30% 70% 0% 0% PS 80309020 Seminis WX255 Willhite Diploid 36,768 3% 86% 11% 0% WX266 Willhite Diploid 36,739 6% 74% 19% 0% #810 (ACX 5408) Abbott & Cobb Summer Flavor Hybrid 36,278 4% 64% 32% 0% Triploid, yellow, high globe, 5-7 kg, high brix, good shipper 35,000 23% 72% 3% 2% WS Yel Seedless F Wannamaker Majestic (XP 4510759) Seminis Triploid 34,460 40% 59% 1% 0% Mardi Gras Rogers Hybrid 34,191 16% 78% 6% 0% Tri-X 313 Rogers Hyb 3N 33,665 10% 90% 0% 0% #5244 Abbott & Cobb Summer Sweet Triploid 31,211 21% 77% 1% 0% 215

Tri-X Palomar Rogers Hyb 3N 29,791 27% 73% 0% 0% RWT 8149 Rogers Hyb 3N 29,516 100% 0% 0% 0% WS Yel Seedless OS Wannamaker Triploid, yellow, globe shape, 4 kg, crisp bright yellow flesh 28,303 57% 43% 0% 0% WS Crimson 166 Wannamaker Seedless 27,127 54% 46% 0% 0% Sweet Delight Rogers Hyb 3N Primed 26,430 25% 74% 2% 0% RWT 8154 Rogers Hyb 3N 26,049 100% 0% 0% 0% WS Crimson 144 Wannamaker Seedless 25,258 28% 72% 0% 0% RWT 8162 Rogers Hyb 3N 24,619 100% 0% 0% 0% WX28 Willhite Triploid (late) 24,379 12% 62% 26% 0% Cha Cha Cha F1 Shamrock Seed Co. Seedless 23,758 44% 56% 0% 0% RWT 8155 Rogers Hyb 3N 23,733 100% 0% 0% 0% WS Orange Palm NQ Wannamaker F1 hybrid orange flesh palm, 2.5 kg 17,243 100% 0% 0% 0% Precious Petite Rogers Hyb 3N 15,471 99% 1% 0% 0% WS Yel Palm PY Wannamaker F1 hybrid, yellow palm avg 2-3 kg, heat tolerant and resistant to cracking 11,681 100% 0% 0% 0% WS Crimson Palm Wannamaker Red, seeded palm, avg 2 kg 9,202 98% 2% 0% 0% CV 43% Fisher's Protected LSD (p 0.05) 20,099 216

Table 2. Watermelon fruit characteristics. Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center, Lyons, GA Length Width Rind Depth Sugar Content Entry Color (in.) (in.) (in.) (%) Comments Olé 3.0 13.6 8.4 0.9 10.8 Allsweet Wrigley 3.0 10.6 7.8 0.9 11.4 Blocky CS, Seedless Sweet Slice 4.0 10.7 8.6 1.1 11.3 Blocky, Seedless, CS, Yellow #7167 3.4 11.0 8.3 1.2 11.1 Seedless, Blocky CS Jamboree 3.0 15.1 7.8 1.0 9.8 Allsweet WS Red Seedless MF 2.6 8.9 8.1 1.0 11.3 CS, Dark, Seedless, Small Top Gun 2.4 11.2 9.3 0.8 10.7 CS, Small, blocky WX207 2.7 17.6 7.8 0.9 10.7 J, Small WX270 3.8 11.6 7.7 0.9 10.9 CS, Red, Blocky, Allsweet, CS WX257 2.1 13.8 6.5 0.9 11.1 Allsweet, Jubilee, Seedless, Small CS #800 (ACX 5413) 3.8 14.8 8.0 1.1 10.0 Allsweet RWT 8145 2.9 12.4 7.7 1.0 11.1 J small, Seedless, Blocky, CS, Variable PS 80309020 4.0 10.9 8.0 1.2 11.3 Blocky CS, Seedless WX255 2.6 13.2 7.7 0.9 9.9 Allsweet WX266 3.3 16.3 7.4 0.9 10.1 Allsweet #810 (ACX 5408) 4.0 14.4 8.1 1.1 9.6 Allsweet WS Yel Seedless F 2.0 10.0 8.8 0.9 11.5 CS, Yellow, Seedless Majestic (XP 4510759) 3.5 11.1 8.1 1.1 11.0 Blocky CS, Seedless Mardi Gras 3.4 13.2 7.5 1.0 9.8 Allsweet Tri-X 313 3.8 10.7 7.8 1.0 11.2 Blocky, CS, Red, Seedless #5244 3.1 10.9 8.0 1.1 10.9 Seedless, Blocky CS 217

Tri-X Palomar 3.4 9.9 8.6 1.0 11.1 CS, Dark Stripe, Red, Seedless Dark, Palm, Sugar Baby, RWT 8149 1.4 7.6 6.7 0.5 11.4 Seedless, Red WS Yel Seedless OS 2.1 9.4 8.0 0.9 11.4 CS, Small, Yellow, Seedless WS Crimson 166 2.4 8.8 7.9 0.8 11.3 CS Small, Seedless, not all, Palm, Dark Sweet Delight 3.6 11.0 8.3 0.9 11.5 Seedless, Pink, Blocky CS RWT 8154 2.9 7.4 6.3 0.5 11.5 Palm, seedless, red WS Crimson 144 3.2 9.0 8.5 0.9 10.5 CS Small Seedless RWT 8162 3.0 6.9 6.2 0.5 11.5 Palm, Red, Yellow rind, Seedless WX28 4.4 14.4 7.4 1.1 9.6 Small Jubilee, Seedless, Not all Cha Cha Cha F1 3.4 10.3 8.1 1.3 11.0 Blocky CS Seedless RWT 8155 1.5 7.3 6.2 0.5 12.0 Palm, seedless, red WS Orange Palm NQ 1.8 8.6 6.1 0.4 10.9 Palm, Yellow, Seeded Precious Petite 2.4 7.3 6.7 0.5 11.1 Palm, red, seedless WS Yel Palm PY 1.8 7.5 6.4 0.5 10.2 Yellow, Palm, Seeded, Breaks easily WS Crimson Palm 3.1 6.9 6.0 0.4 10.5 Palm, Seeded, Breaks easily CV 9% Fisher s Protected LSD (p 0.05) 1.4 218

Table 3. Cantaloupe Variety Trial, 2004. Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center, Lyons, GA Yield/acre Length Width Flesh Depth Entry Company Description No. of Fruit/acre (lbs) (in.) (in.) (in.) Athena Rogers Hybrid 7,623 38,557 7.6 6.1 1.9 Aphrodite Rogers Hybrid 5,748 37,437 8.0 6.8 1.7 WS-SP04 Wannamaker small specialty melon, 0.5-0.75 kg, 'Sprite-type', high sugar 7,442 27,491 6.0 5.8 1.8 PX 1461-1013 Seminis Hybrid 6,050 31,109 7.5 6.3 2.3 Jaipur (BS 4309397) Seminis Hybrid 7,260 38,932 7.8 6.2 1.9 Moneyloupe (ACX 3908) Abbott & Cobb Hybrid 4,538 27,316 8.3 6.5 2.1 ACX 4757 Abbott & Cobb Hybrid 72 Maturity Fruit 6,050 37,577 8.5 6.4 2.0 Shape Oval CV 22% 27% Fisher's Protected LSD (p 0.05) NS NS 219